Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 4600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.

Sunday, May 12, 2019

Please NOTE:


By Anna Von Reitz

Quote from Second Comment About Michigan General Jural Assembly: 

"Anyway, the people running the Michigan General Jural Assembly have resisted the necessity of correcting their own political status and making it clear that they are acting exclusively as American State Citizens --- that is, as one of the People --- and without this "singular allegiance" being plainly executed, adopted, and on the public record for each one of the Jural Assembly Members, it's not possible for them to act in the capacity of "one of the People" and it is not possible for their assembly to act as a Body Politic for their actual State.
All their work is invalidated for failure to clearly and unequivocally declare their political status as American State Citizens with no other citizenship obligations.
Our Forefathers did this to prevent conflicts of interest. They did not intend that people holding Dual Citizenship of any kind would be empowered to make decisions affecting our land and soil." 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

3 comments:

  1. Our government is captured by dual citizens with loyalty to Israel .
    Wish it was a clear case of being a a state national but the fact is our courts don't care they deal in equity you have to deal with them in contract law showing your new contract in attempting to settle the matter and and arrobertration.
    This becomes your counter claim .
    Prove your the the trust owner and tell the judge to settle it.
    This is what they understand .

    ReplyDelete
  2. In regards to citizenship, besides the oath of allegiance and expatriation, do we not need a sworn oath to said “country” otherwise known as states for correct standing?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I noticed a newer color of law law that makes police or law enforcement officers off the hook, not liable for not seizing property.
    So this reveals is what I am getting at is that employees in an office or job of police officer can be charged with failure to seize your property and lose their job. Just following orders mostly blind but need a job. Seems they would be more mad about being used like dogs than anyone and would be helping out like the constitutional Sheriffs actions in dealing with the crimes.

    ReplyDelete