Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Friday, June 29, 2018

Confusion About the Indemnity Bond


By Anna Von Reitz

When you operate in commerce --if you ever legitimately do--(remember that "commerce" is business between two incorporated entities) you typically need insurance of some kind -- liability insurance, fire insurance, insurance against illness, accident, unemployment, theft, wrongful death, auto insurance, life insurance, casualty insurance, flood insurance.... the list goes on.

When you operate in trade (business between unincorporated parties) you also need protection, which is provided by an indemnity bond. 
One way that the rats have worked their system is by making sure that you don't have an indemnity bond, and therefore "can't" be operating in a private capacity in international trade.

It's an "omission" on your part that allows them to presume that you can "only" be operating in commerce as one of their very own franchises, subject to their whims, and their statutes.


So one of the first steps toward becoming truly independent and being able to operate "privately" is the establishment of an indemnity bond. They've made this very difficult also. There are few bonding agencies that even know what you are talking about, and those that do are likely to mistake you for a pauper and demand a huge cash bond before they issue an indemnity bond for you. 
We, The Living Law Firm, finally put an end to that dodge, by establishing an Indemnity Bond that covers the States of the Union, and thereby everyone living in the States. 
When you go into one of their courts to protest their presumption that you are one of their franchises and acting in that capacity "voluntarily" or, otherwise, that you are irresponsible and operating without indemnity--and therefore are "incompetent" and under their control, you present the Court Clerk and the Court Administrator (the Judge) with a copy of your State of the Union Indemnity Bond -- RA 393427640 US. If you wish, you can add the name of your birth State, such as Florida, Maine, or Minnesota.

Most of us Joe Averages who have not chosen to create incorporated entities of any kind, can then produce our Deed of Re-Conveyance showing that we have officially and knowingly transferred our Given Trade Name back to the land and soil jurisdiction State where we were born, and also produce our recorded Certificate of Assumed Name(s) which documents "their" expatriation back to the land and soil jurisdiction, too. This gives a three-pronged defense against any presumption that you are voluntarily acting as one of their franchisees or in any public capacity related to them at all.

This deprives them of all their usual excuses to act "as" your guardians and "assume" Powers of Attorney never granted to them.

There is typically only one other thing needed (besides a backbone) to put them in their places and that is a specific denial of any Power of Attorney. My dear friend, "rb" Young, the Marine I eulogized earlier this month provided the following Revocation:

Know by all men these presents in the interest of/for the Administration of Justice...

In the form of a Letter of wishes regarding: The Revocation of Power of Attorney by: me: rb…

To Whom it may concern:

The Revocation of your Power of Attorney
as per your: [cf] Uniform Power of Attorney Act Section 1101 and Montana Codes Annotated 72-31-310 states: Termination of power of attorney or agent's authority. (1) A power of attorney terminates when: (c) the principal revokes the power of attorney; (2) An agent's authority terminates when: (a) the principal revokes the authority; (6) The execution of a power of attorney does not revoke a power of attorney previously executed by the principal unless the subsequent power of attorney provides that the previous power of attorney is revoked or that all other powers of attorney are revoked.[cf]

Therefore...
It is my wish, my order, and my command to any and all such parties: as of this memorial moment; i, me, (us, we) hereby revoke, rescind, remove and deny any and all assumed and/or presumed power(s) of attorney(s) part and parcel, that you think you may or might have had...previously invoked and/or all otherwise utilized are hereby REVOKED from this day forward; dated as now for then. PERIOD.

/s/

May our beloved "rb" rest in the peace he has earned with the Savior he loved, and may you all listen and benefit from his hard work, research, dedication, love of country, and love of fellow man.

Every time you have to deal with any court or attorney pressing in upon you and making "presumptions" --- issue your version of rb's Revocation -- and present your Deed of Re-Conveyance, your Certificate of Assumed Names/NAMES, and your State's Private Registered Indemnity Bond.

Make it clear that they are on your soil and your land and they had better "shove off" and leave your "internationally protected person" --- alone.

----------------------------
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

208 comments:

  1. this is also explained by kw in this article,,,,,,,,,,,,,,....................Greetings,
    I have been asked by several men and women to forward to them documents concerning resignation of a registered agent. I feel it is prudent to explain the Facts regarding the instrument known as a Certification of Birth.
    Anyone who has studied and researched these matters, for any good length of time, has come to the conclusion that the person represented by the Birth Certificate is not a man, but an artificial person.
    It is an entity. A person other than a natural person. While there are many theories of how that entity was created, I believe the simple, more important facts are being overlooked. Particularly one’s relation-ship to it.
    I will now address obvious facts.
    1) An entity can do no-thing. It must have a representative, an officer, agent, fiduciary or some man or woman to act on it’s behalf.
    2) This entity must have a name. The legal name of this Entity is what we refer to as the ALL CAP NAME.
    3) All entities, foreign or domestic, must qualify to transact business in your “state”. It must comply with all statutes concerning registration.
    4) All entities must have a registered office and a registered agent for service of process.

    Once one becomes aware of this entity, Logic must be used.
    Congress has stated that a citizen of the United States is a civilly dead entity, Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.

    We must understand the “entity”.
    Where is the proof, token or evidence that this entity exist?
    What is the legal name of the entity?
    Under what jurisdiction and law was this entity organized?
    So let us take a look at the Kentucky Revised Statutes pertaining to entities and organizations doing business in the Commonwealth.
    KRS 14A.
    14A.1-020 Application.
    Each entity and each foreign entity is subject to the provisions of this chapter.
    14A.4-010bRegistered office and registered agent required.b
    (1) Each entity and each foreign entity qualified to transact business in this
    Commonwealth shall continuously maintain in this Commonwealth:
    (a) A registered office that may be the same as any of its places of business;
    and
    (b) A registered agent, who may be:
    1. An individual who resides in this Commonwealth and whose
    business address is identical with the registered office; or
    2. An entity or foreign entity qualified to transact business in this
    Commonwealth whose business address is identical with the
    registered office.

    14A.4-040bService through registered agent.
    (1) An entity's or foreign entity's registered agent shall be its agent for service of
    process, notice, or demand required or permitted by law to be served on the
    entity or foreign entity.


    I hope these provisions give a little hint as to your relationship to it. We must understand the Facts.

    Let us examine the facts with a better understanding of the entity and the proof of it’s existence.
    I was listening to some Judges, attorneys, and law professors discuss the UCC. Here is the link. http://youtu.be/EQM6rjkVjtU . Law professor Linda Rousch was discussing the legal name of a registered organization (see UCC art 9 (def)). Judge Bruce Markell then says… “ the state issues a Birth Certificate.”, being a public record showing the organization was organized.

    I will now present my argument and remedy.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does a url exist for:
      "Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646"?
      -

      Delete
    2. Congressional Record pp15641-15646-
      http://www.14th-amendment.com/Historical_Documents/Congressional_Record/June_13_1967/Non_Ratification_14th_Amendment.pdf

      Delete
    3. @JILL ZABRENDA, I found it very interesting in the video from 39:50 through 42:00, the emphasis on perfection of filing for bankruptcy under article 9 that the reference to the "correct legal name" being significantly important and that the legal name paired with the "trade name" might render the incorrect name and also at 42:00 Linda Rous recommends "ban the trade name"

      Just a point of note from my perspective, I took business law in the '60's in High School as well in the 70's during my Certified General Accounting course and erroneously assumed the trade name as in the following: I incorporated a business in Ontario and the charter was listed as a numbered Ontario Ltd company dba as "XXXXXXXX" the name of the business as the trade name. It wasn't until I understood Anna's explanation of what the trade name actually meant all these 40+ years later.

      After reading the congressional record above, the fraud was committed back in the 1860's and has been forever perpetrated upon the people ever since. Odd that the congress declared military/martial law to take over enough states to falsely ratify the 14th. Hopefully now the time has come to resolve this gross infraction upon the people of the world.

      Delete
    4. Too bad NOONE would "ACCEPT MY CHALLENGE" IN ANY LICENSED BUSINESSS in the DE-FACTO PUBLIC STATES, and I had to LEAVE the "SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION" to get my "Private TRUTH VALIDATED" by a Foreign Born & Foreign EDUCATED individual!!! Wake up SHEEPLE!!!

      Delete
    5. Thank You Dan!
      Just attempted to access the PDF however I got a message: "Blocked Plugin". Any suggestions on how I may overcome that? -
      In Gratitude!
      `

      Delete
  2. Rip off!!! Anne's trying to rip you folks off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alright who left the door open? Now look what the cat drug in!

      Delete
    2. I've been studying now for over 20 years, and except for a few things Anna has put out, which deal with history from several thousand years ago, she is dead nuts on point. I've seen just about everything out there. I find her to be a breath of fresh air in this world under the control of Satan. If you have been looking at these things as long as myself and Paul Stramer, you can see who is pushing the BS around and poo pooing those who expose the truth. I don't just take someone's word for things, so I have seen many of the things in black ink on white paper before I found Anna's site. Instead of just making some derogitory remarks, present your facts about what is wrong with the information, with research that can be confirmed by others, or just go away.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. If by "Rip you people off" you mean rip us off the system that has enslaved us our entire lives, well then I'd have to agree with you. But if by "Rip you people off" you mean steal from us, or sell us a bad product, well then she's doing a terrible job at that, seeing that she gives away all this info for FREE, has nothing to sell that I know of, doesn't charge a membership fee. She only mentions money when the needs are great and frankly, if you are benefiting from her work and the work of the LLF, you should be supporting the effort.
      What are your intentions here UCADIA? Just trying to save us from being ripped off?

      Delete
    5. She's giving you all the false impression that you can be tax free in the United States while operating in your secular/forprofit capacity. This is misguidance in its purest form. The next logical step is for her to collect money from all you unsuspecting people in order to provide indemnity bond products that will be useless in society-at-large.

      Delete
    6. But I must digress because you all are like moths to a flame. Good luck.

      Delete
    7. Why do people feel the need to talk about someone elses process and no have any pertenent information except for letting us know you like to run your mouth

      Delete
    8. Well surprise,surprise, UCADIA. You can be tax free no matter what your status is. I am. If you wouldn't be so ignorant and pigheaded you could pay attention and learn something instead of CCCing everything that is posted here. Last year I zeroed out $121k of tax debt. They literally sent me a letter that my case was closed and set my balance to zero. And now with the tax court petition it is even easier for even a US citizen to have the judge of the US tax court give then a court order dismissal for LOJ. Now put that in your pipe and smoke it.
      O, and by the way, Anna didn't charge me a dime.

      Delete
    9. Anyone can claim anything. I personally would not follow any of Anne's advice nor your's.

      Delete
    10. Right, and that exactly is why you are broke, in debt and paying taxes and I'm not any of those. How does that saying go again? O, yeah, if you think education is expensive, try ignorance.

      Delete
    11. UCADIA, you have more than shown anyone with eyes to see, ears to hear "WHO" your MASTER IN THEIVERY Is that YOU have chosen to SUBMIT to and weakly MASK as your "God" who you serve and attempt to recruit for your twisted, assbackwards religious cult organization and feed your angry bitter koolaid to waking, confused living souls!!!!

      You Will reap what you sow no matter how you attempt to justify yourself and your chosen behavior.

      Your message and your corporate business name are both "knock off" copies of originals.
      Your MASTER sure does LOVE his GRAVEN IMAGES created as Knock offs of All original Creation to CLAIM and CONTROL "OWNERSHIP" and FALSE AUTHORITY "OVER" doesn't he??

      Silly, pathetic WOLF IN Shepard clothing! Your "GIG" IS exposed and your "time" IS Now Over, See ya and good riddance!!!


      Delete
    12. Why so much hostility? Have you read the Constitutions of The Society of Jesus? How can anyone not be impressed by them?

      Delete
    13. So you are a Jesuit. Well that explains a lot, Kerubale. Or should I say Keru-Baal. Right back at you, why so much hostility on your part? You come out swinging at everyone and expect respect in return? Sorry. It doesn't work that way.

      Delete
    14. The ideas that Anne promotes are not practical. No need to be all defensive. Just giving my few pennies. Take it or leave it.

      Delete
    15. Besides, for all you know, Anne can be a temporal coadjutor. For all you folks know, she has her teeth sunk in you all and you are totally clueless.

      Delete
    16. Kerubale, you have not contributed anything, nada, zilch. Only criticism. Do you know the definition of a critic according to Readers Digest? A critic is a person who sits on the sidelines and utters snide lines. That describes you to a T! You are the coadjutor here and the one who is totally clueless. Sorry, but we don't bite. Maybe you are welcome on other blogs but not here with that attitude. Anna's practical advice has set me free after years of pursuing alternative remedies. Her ideas are the only ones that worked and they worked for me. You have not offered a thing, only theories. And a man with an experience is never at the mercy of a man with a theory.

      Delete
    17. As I've mentioned before, anyone can claim anything. You are claiming things that are difficult for you to prove as absolute truth. And even if you had proof, no one is legally or morally obligated to believe it.

      Delete
    18. To claim that you are not a 14th Amendment citizen is to waive your rights as a U.S. citizen. Can't you see the subversion that is taking place? You folks are actually alienating yourselves from the society-at-large and the mechanisms that are in place that administers justice. It's very unfortunate to watch "from the sidelines."

      Delete
    19. But I'm watching nevertheless and taking notes.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk7E76aEteA

      Delete
    20. And what have you proven other than that you are not only insulting but completely off your rocker. Proof is in your statement about US citizens. Every indivual that has done just just a bit of research knows that 14th amendment US federal citizens have no rights as persons and are trampled upon in every court in this country. What is wrong with you? And your video is ridiculous and makes no sense whatsoever. Just more proof of your being completely out of touch with reality, your incohesiveness and total discombobulation. But I would not expect any different from a Jesuit antichrist non-believer.

      Delete
    21. The status-quo will side with me about the 14th Amendment part. Do we at least agree on this?

      Delete
    22. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M70gJ6bB1p8

      Delete
    23. No. I don't agree with you on anything. Again your video makes no sense whatsoever. Is this just a self portrait with music? Don't you have anything better to do?

      Delete
    24. Now you are just unreasonable. Getting ever so close to extremism.

      Delete
    25. Have you seen the Law Enforcement Sovereign citizen training video going around on youtube.

      Delete
    26. Not unreasonable or extreme, Kerubale. You just have not said one intelligent thing that I can agree with. And no, I am not a sovereign citizen. That's an oxymoron. So why should I bother. Again why are you wasting your time here. It is obvious you are not on the same page and do not belong on this blog.

      Delete
    27. You'd be categorized as a "Sovereign Citizen" by law enforcement if you are known to denounce your 14th Amendment Citizenship. This would happen regardless of whether you agree with being labeled one or not.

      Delete
    28. Wrong again, Kerubale. Where is your proof of your so called stated facts? Again you are merely spouting your baseless theories. You've been batting zero all along. Embarrassing inst it? There is no such animal as a sovereign citizen. There is no such determination or definition in current codes or statutes nor can one be charged as being such. I have already renounced my 14th amendment US corporate federal citizenship with the DOS and am now officially classified on file as a non citizen state national and have a passport to prove it issued and determined as such by the DOS under the seal and signature of the SOS of which I have a certified copy with a big red ribbon and a gold seal embossed by the DOS which states that it complies with all rules of federal civil procedure and is valid as evidence in any court in the US. As such no court has any jurisdiction over me. I even have a passport card that is coded in the FBI/NCIC database as RED ALERT! - DO NOT STOP - DO NOT DETAIN - DO NOT INTERROGATE - LIFETIME CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMIT. But I'll stop there because I know all this is just going over your head.

      Delete
    29. You are delusional. Merely stating what you want to be the truth. Just watch the training video. If you denounce your 14th Amendment status you are thus classified as a Sovereign Citizen by law enforcement. Believe whatever you like. I'm proud to be a 14th Amendment U.S. Citizen just like the majority of people that live in the United States. Good luck with your crackpot theories.

      Delete
    30. Watch this:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALPs_n0WQaY

      Delete
    31. Hey Kerubale, wrong again. This is fake news. The video of the father and son was proven to be fake news since the son never wore a red t-shirt the day they were shot and neither father or son looked like the real father and son they ambushed at all. These were Jerry and Joseph Kane. They actually staged this horribly botched video production to cover up their outright murder of this father and son team whose only "crime" was teaching people how to defeat mortgages and to use it as propaganda to promote their fake moniker of sovereign citizen to persecute American nationals who know the difference. Many such videos have been produced using crisis actors. Apparently you are gullible enough to swallow this diatribe. The war is real because they know the fraud they have purported upon the American people. Their time is short and they are being found out left and right and being defeated. We have already set many people free from jail, stopped people from being remanded back to jail, stopped tax collection enforcement, obtained LOJ orders from US tax court, had liens removed and levies refunded, cancelled debts and defeated foreclosures (30 to date). What do you have to show for all your efforts that even comes close? Like I already told you several times now, there is no such thing as a sovereign citizen. You are either a sovereign or a citizen. You cannot be both. As a sovereign the correct name is foreign sovereign to which you cannot attach the word citizen. As such a foreign sovereign is a national of the United States of America Republic and foreign to the US Corporation. Foreign sovereigns to the US are are not anti-government but instead pro-Constitutional American common law government. I am the only one stating facts here and you are the one who is delusional. Especially when you claim to be proud to be part of the system as a 14th amendment US citizen. As such you are part of the problem. I will tell you again, you do not belong here on this blog. You are not compatible with this crowd at all and a fish out of water. There is not one commenter here who agrees with you. You are simply wasting your time. I have been entertaining you in the hopes that you might wake up and smell the coffee. But by your own confession, you are beyond repair. Please stop wasting your time and ours here and find some blog where they might appreciate your fairy tales.

      Delete
    32. Thanks for the material. This is great material for demonstrating the level of delusion that are amongst some.
      https://web.archive.org/save/http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/06/confusion-about-indemnity-bond.html?showComment=1530480419929#c4524680853885520723


      https://web.archive.org/save/http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/06/confusion-about-indemnity-bond.html?showComment=1530480419929#c4524680853885520723

      Delete
    33. Ucadia, Answer this one simple question. Why are you here? A novation is a response with out answering the question. Again, why are you here?

      Delete
    34. For everyone's benefit to understand, to expat as a U.S. CITIZEN is not the same thing as expat from being a U.S.National. If a person expat's from the nation, they lose their american citizenship. If they expat only from the U.S.citizenship, they maintain their national status. Here it is in the U.S. Codes.
      "8 U.S. Code § 1481 national of the United States
      (22)The term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States." Anna's forms do not expat, the national citizenship, of being an American. Anna's forms expat from the UNITED STATES, INC. Using her form, you remain, an American and not only that you secure your rights as an American back to yourself and the U.S. can not infringe your rights. Any one who wants THE U.S. NATIONAL PASSPORT, after they do ANNA'S paperwork, the U.S. State Department has a special section on its website to assist U.S. NATIONALS To obtain their passports. You don't submit your passport application to post offices, the state dept has set up U.S.National passport centers to help you. You don't need an SS#. here's the link:https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/passports/requirements/where-to-apply/passport-agencies/npc.html
      Also the definition of a U.S. NATIONAL is found in Section 101(a)(21) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and 8 USC 1452(b) Here's the US state dept website for those codes and the title 8.1452 (b) instructions, that back up Anna's forms.
      https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/travel-legal-considerations/us-citizenship/Certificates-Non-Citizen-Nationality.html and https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-8-aliens-and-nationality/8-usc-sect-1452.html
      Anna's forms are backed up as you can see by U.S. state department and USC STATUTES. Don't let liars like UCADIA, full you. He's truly a shill.This is why I say, make sure you are standing on a rock and thinking for yourself. The rock is the law, not vomit from the likes of UCADIA.

      Delete
    35. PS. Everyone should read USC TITLE 8 and understand how it applies to you. The US GOVT knows the difference and makes exemptions and exceptions to U.S. NATIONALS, WHO RE NOT US CITIZENS. 8 U.S. Code § 1481 (B)

      Delete
    36. So let me get this right. As a "U.S. National," you can operate a motor vehicle at speeds that violate the speed limit and get away with it?

      You can put U.S. Citizens and others' lives at risk on roadways?

      Delete
    37. What law states that "U.S. Nationals" cannot have charges or suits pressed against them in General District or Federal Courts?

      Delete
    38. What law states that U.S. Nationals are not subject to State and Federal taxation?

      Delete
    39. U.S. national is a person born in or having ties with “an outlying possession of the United States” which is as of 2005, only American Samoa and Swains Island. Additionally, it also includes those individuals born abroad to two U.S. national parents, or those born abroad to one alien parent and one U.S. national parent (all 14th Amendment U.S. citizens are considered U.S. nationals but all U.S. nationals are not considered 14th Amendment U.S. citizens). Additionally, there is a residency requirement for the parents of the child prior to birth in order to transmit U.S. nationality.

      In the past, those who were born in Guam (1898-1950), Puerto Rico (1898-1917), the U.S. Virgin Islands (1917-1927) or the Phillippines (1989-1946) were U.S. nationals. However, now those who are born in Guam, Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands are 14th Amendment U.S. citizens, and the Phillipines is an independent country and the 14th Amendment citizenship was never accorded to them.

      Delete
    40. So are you claiming to have been born abroad in the American Samoa or Swains Island? Or are you claiming to have been born abroad to two 14th Amendment U.S. citizens? Or are you claiming to have been born abroad to one alien parent and one 14th Amendment U.S. citizen? Is Anne assisting you folks in committing perjury in her forms that you are submitting to the Federal government?

      Delete
    41. UCADIA, you claim to be an expert. You have been ripping everyone on this forum apart with your shenigans. Ok I'll play...what does the actual law say? want to know? motor vehicle is defined as: a motorized vehicle for the transportation of passengers or property for a FEE. all motor vehicles have to be licensed. definition of an operator: a person who is EMPLOYED for the purposes of transportation. Legal definition of passenger: passenger is a rider who has paid a fare on a train, bus, airline, taxi, ship, ferry, automobile or other carrier in the business of transporting people for compensation. You see UCADIA, YOU DON'T KNOW CRAP. By, the way, my unincorporated dba can have a license and an automobile and not be subject to any traffic laws! wanna know how? "The CLAIM and EXERCISE of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." - Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489. American Jurisprudence has well established locomotion by the People for personal household use, including go to and from work, is a RIGHT and is not a benefit/privilege which the laws, rules and regulations can abrogate. Every state has court rulings, that classify private use of an automobile is a RIGHT! Want to know where all STATE OF MOTOR VEHICLE LAWS GET AUTHORITY TO OPERATE? The federal transportation department! That's where all the laws come from the federal govt administrative laws and procedures. So if you want questions answered about the motor vehicle laws, go to the federal definitions within the US dept of transportation. UCADIA, you want to teach people the law and you don't know these things? I'm truly amazed. So I truly can't remember the last time, I charged a fee to have someone in my car or to take something somewhere and get paid for it. Oh wait, yes I can: NEVER!

      Delete
    42. UCADIA why do you think the legal profession has a legal term: automobile? and one for motor vehicle? why 2 different legal terms? why is that do you think? Why do Bar Attorneys make a legal difference between automobile and motor vehicle?
      Legal definition: What is AUTOMOBILE?
      A vehicle with four wheels and an engine. They move people and cargo around. Gasoline is the fuel for this transportation method. Some have electric or water run engines as well.
      18 U.S. Code § 31
      (6)MOTOR VEHICLE.—
      The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for COMMERCIAL purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.

      Delete
    43. So you believe that you have the right to put U.S. citizen and others' lives in danger by exceeding speed limits?

      Delete
    44. I never claimed to be an expert in law or teach people the law. Have no clue what you are talking about. I never went to law school. If there is anyone here that is claiming to be experts in law it is you fools. You are so full of yourselves yet 100% certain that you are right. Ask Dean Clifford how it feels to be locked up for being a numbskull "Sovereign Citizen."

      Delete
    45. I just want to get to the bottom of everything. It seems like you guys are looking for any and every excuse to break laws. You have time and time again experienced failure. Yet you are still persistent. This is what is known as extremism. It is a sickness. Interesting to watch from the sidelines.

      Delete
    46. Where did I state that I taught law or was an expert at law?

      Delete
    47. UCADIA, I am well past believing, I am into knowing and experiencing truth. But, I am glad you posted back to me, because I have this to say to you and your Jesuit black magic pals: The True Sons of God are now rising and in these last days, those things that were hidden in darkness are being brought to light. The day of the rule and reign of mystery babylon is ending and war is being waged in the heavenlies and the true light of Christ is shining and his spirit is being poured out on all flesh and his sons and daughters are prophesying...the time of your appointed end, has come. Your rule and reign on the Earth is over and you lose. The light that is being shined on this forum is part of it and for all your dark efforts to stop it, its going forth. You lose! One greater than you and your God of darkness, has come and he is alive and well in his people and he is opening their understanding and he is opening the spiritual eyes and ears and they are seeing and hearing and nothing you and your darkness can do, can stop it. The TRUE LIGHT of Christ has come into the world and it is proclaiming the end of all those like you who have chosen to walk in darkness. Please take that back to your Jesuit buddies. Time's Up! That comes to you from the TRUE AND THE LIVING GOD, Jesus Christ whom you crucified.

      Delete
    48. Oh so not only are you an extremist but you are also a fundamentalist. Go on.

      Delete
    49. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcB1iwtEfQw

      Delete
    50. UCADIA, your imaginary titles mean nothing to me. Truth...times up....take that to the bank...better yet...take that to your JESUIT, BLACK MAGIC, LUCIFER WORSHIPPING BUDDIES. His time for making war against the true Saints of God is up. Are you ready to go with your God, into the place that has been prepared for him? His APPOINTMENT TIME, has come. YOU CAN'T STOP IT! ALL YOUR EFFORTS ARE IN VAIN!

      Delete
    51. What does all that religious crap have to do with keeping other people on roadways safe by pulling over vehicles and giving people citations?

      Delete
    52. Is the light of Christ compelling people to place others' lives in danger by speeding?

      Delete
    53. You do realize that there is freedom of religion in the U.S., right? People are perfectly entitled to worship whomever they please.

      Delete
    54. NOTHING, I don't need to say anything else about motor vehicle laws, the truth has already been spoken! I'm talking to you personally! I am speaking to you truth about your situation. By the way, I am not religious and claim no religion at all. Your problem is, you fail to recognize truth, when it is spoken to you or maybe you just try to brush it off. I don't care! Truth is eternal, it changes not! Let me give you a good dose of truth right now: REVELATION CHAPTER 17 AND 18, tell your Jesuit buddies, will you?

      Delete
    55. And you assume that the vile filthy that has consumed your mind hasn't been manufactured by Jesuits? You can't see the hand on the other end of the leash hahaha!!!!!

      Delete
    56. We are pulling on the divine threads. You folks just don't realize it. You take our poison in the form of medicine. Never underestimate your enemy.

      Delete
    57. Read the Constitutions and you will know what you are up against. You'll never win.

      Delete
    58. Constitutions of The Society of Jesus*****

      Delete
    59. UCADIA, ok I'll answer: if the light of Christ is within and alive in them, they won't put someone else in danger, because they value all life. 2.) I don't care about religious freedom, nor have I tried to stop anyone from worshipping whatever or whoever they want. 3.) So yes, continue being a Jesuit, I don't have a problem with that, but the ONE who is above the Jesuit God (Lucifer) definitely has a problem with who you worship. 4.) Point is this: tell your God, Lucifer and your Jesuit buddies, the ONE true God set an appointment date, times up! That's it! Neither you, nor your buddies, nor your God can stop it! Point made, nothing else to say!

      Delete
    60. Tell that to the police officer that pulls you over and the Judge who stands in the place of Christ.

      Delete
    61. Your superior should always stand in the place of Christ and shall be obeyed as Christ. This includes law enforcement, Magistrates, and Judges.

      Delete
    62. If you read the Constitutions instead of countless hours consuming absolute garbage online, then you would know this.

      Delete
    63. Now, see there we go, a true dark entity just appeared. You dark spirit liar, deceiver who comes to claim the lives of all mankind, I speak the truth right now, standing fully in the name of Jesus Christ, the power to win is with us and your time is up. Its over for you, I now proclaim by the power of the Lord God almighty, creator of heaven and Earth, you lose! It is finished, by the shed blood of the Lamb, who was and is and is come! Nothing you speak shall be received as truth on this forum. I now, speak to your in the full power and authority of the Lord Jesus Christ, the one who sits on the throne. TIMES UP! Your power and authority is over! Your time of destruction has ended!You lose. The Sons of God are here now, they know who they are and they know who you are and we proclaim the end for you! It is FINISHED!The LIGHT is SHINING IN THE DARKNESS! You are being exposed! I speak now, AS A FULLY CLOTHED SON OF RIGHTEOUSNESS CLOTHED IN WHITE GARMENTS, IN ALL THE POWER AND AUTHORITY OF JESUS CHRIST THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF THE FATHER. You are finished! I now proclaim, all your dark lies to be exposed by the light and you are powerless to stop it. It's over! I stand in the name and fully clothed in the name JESUS CHRIST! You are rebuked now in all heaven and Earth, by Jesus Christ.

      Delete
    64. Thanks for the material.
      https://web.archive.org/save/http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/06/confusion-about-indemnity-bond.html?showComment=1530494809958#c4791540150443055956

      Delete
    65. Hold it, C, he finally made some sense. Not much, but some. Even in his ignorance, he is correct that you were not born in Samoa or Swains Island and therefor,you are NOT a national of the US subject to the US. There are 3 nationalities recognized by the US: 1) US citizen, 2) non-citizen national of the US and 3) non-citizen national (not of the US) which is also an Americal national. We are the last and Mr Ucadia claims to be the first. However, he does not realize that even he cannot be a US citizen. No one can. Since the US is a corporation, you can only be a shareholder or an employee. You cannot be a citizen of the US any more than you can be a citizen of McDonalds. The only part of him that is a US citizen is his NAME which is a trust and a corporate fiction for which he is considered to be the trustee when called into court, pay taxes or vote. It is like using a pawn in a monopoly game. So he is considered an employee of the US and therefor subject to taxatiion and other benefit privileges like jail. We are not. The passport I applied for and received was based on this NCSN (non-citizen state national) status but which is not an option on the application. You have to state it in a separate ES (Expalantory Statement). The reason they have to honor it is because when they superimposed the US Corporation over the republic, they had to leave a way for the people to be able to still access the republic or they would have been hung for treason. The DOS recognizes this and will issue what they consider to be a Constitutional State Citizen (Capital C) passport according to the State Citizen Clause of the Constitution. Regardless of what they call it, it is not the first or second category and as such not subject to US jurisdiction.

      Delete
    66. And by the way, we do not acknowledge or recognize any Jesuit constitution.

      Delete
    67. 1freeman, study USC title 8. look at the definition in that title for United States. See here is where the trickery and witchcraft comes in. in title 8 the United States is defined: the continental united states (that's the 50 states) and dc and the territories and the districts. Where are nationals born? and where are U.S. citizens born? The NATION (thus NATIONALS) is not the U.S. territories. The Nation is the continental united states. THINK! Ok, now that we have defined the Nation, lets define the UNITED STATES: DC and the territories. So let's put the entire package together pursuant to title 8. People who are born 1.)on the continent and PERSONS born in DC and the territories are NATIONALS AND U.S. CITIZENS. Understand? Do you get what it is saying? You, if you were born on the continent (the Nation) you have dual citizenship. You are both U.S. NATIONAL AND U.S. CITIZEN. You were U.S. NATIONAL BY NATIVITY AND U.S CITIZEN BY NATURALIZATION OF BIRTH CERTIFICATE a few days after your birth when the certificate was issued. But along with that, the U.S. decided 2 of the territories would also be NATIONALS AND US CITIZENS FOR US PURPOSES. That has nothing to do with our dual citizenship. You must look at part (B)
      "8 U.S. Code § 1481 national of the United States
      (22)The term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States." In part B, the United States is the continental United States and the municipal and territorial United States. Part B is you, if you were born on the continent. Hopefully you owe allegiance to the Continental United States, I know I do! But, there's another stipulation:8 USC 1452(b). You were naturalized by your parent as a U.S. CITIZEN by application. But your NATURAL citizen is U.S. National because you had nativity on the land of the continent. But that's not all:8 U.S. Code § 1101(21) The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state. What state? on the continent, as is described in the title 8 definition of the United States. But, also in the infamous 14th amendment: All persons BORN or NATURALIZED in the United States, AND SUBJECT to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States AND OF THE STATE WHEREIN THEY RESIDE! See that reside? Does RESIDENT ring a bell? does born in the United States or NATURALIZED ring a bell? BY THE WAY the UNITED STATES USED HERE....IS DC. So if you were born on the continent were you born in the UNITED STATES, in this amendment? NO! So how did you become a U.S. CITIZEN? NATURALIZED BY B/C being issued. When were you naturalized? a few days after your nativity! What was your true citizen status before the naturalization occurred? American:State National. You were a citizen of the Nation and the state of your nativity. Everyone must understand, the UNITED STATES is used to mean different things, depending on the statute it is used within. The problem is, because of the B/C issuance, the People have not known of their primary and superior status of U.S.National. that is why I say, to study USC title 8. I sincerely mean, study it. Learn who you are. and no Ucadia has no clue.

      Delete
    68. Ps. 1freeman, just so you will know. the confrontation between Ucadia and I, that just occurred, was in the spirit. I will leave it at that, as I can not speak further about what occurred.

      Delete
    69. I hear what you are saying, C, but reread my last message. If you want a NCSN passport, you cannot select to be a non-citizen national of the US or they will deny you a passport for not stating your proper nationality on your application. But don't take my word for it. Talk to Chrostopeher Gronski at destinationfreedom.org who's process I used to obtain mine within 3 weeks. He's been doing this for 25 years.

      Delete
    70. also, 1freeman, WITHIN U.S.C. TITLE 8:
      DUAL CITIZENSHIP or U.S. NATIONAL only. but what is absent from title 8, U.S. Citizen only. U.S. Citizenship only is found within U.S. and not U.S.C. LAWS. In U.S.C. laws, are laws concerning dual citizenship or U.S. NATIONAL ONLY. The only way you can be a U.S. NATIONAL ONLY declaring an oath of allegiance to your state. The U.S. in the U.S.NATIONAL is the continental U.S. and Samoa and Swains Island. so choose one of those States and swear and oath to it and you are a U.S.(continent) NATIONAL, non-U.S.(INC-14TH AMENDMENT) CITIZEN.The expat paperwork, by Anna does this!

      Delete
    71. 1 freeman: I quote from you "non-citizen national of the US" will be turned down. I absolutely agree. That term the way it is configured is wrong. Let's reconfigure it to this: U.S. NATIONAL, NON-U.S. CITIZEN. Read my comments, study title 8. Your primary citizenship, at nativity: U.S. NATIONAL. at issuance of birth certificate: U.S CITIZENSHIP (NATURALIZED) was added. Thus U.S. NATIONAL AND U.S.CITIZEN. But, then comes the expat (Anna's form). Minus the U.S.Citizen. What do you have left? U.S. National, non-U.S. Citizen. That is what title 8 defines. Again, the U.S. IN U.S. NATIONAL, is the continent and the U.S. in U.S. CITIZEN is the 14th amendment U.S. which is DC and its territories. Remember this: United States and UNITED STATES. They are not the same thing. United States (small and large letters) is continental and sometimes includes dc and territories. UNITED STATES (all caps) is DC and the territories. You have to be careful of which statute is being used to define the US. Is the statute in US or USC. If its in a U.S. statute, the U.S. does not include the continent. If its the U.S. in U.S.C. statutes, it will include the continent. So in U.S.C. TITLE 8, the continent is included as part of the U.S.

      Delete
    72. ps. the legal term: born abroad to U.S. National parents. born abroad is defined without the UNITED STATES (ALL CAPS). not within the UNITED STATES, but without. what is without the UNITED STATES, that would make people U.S. NATIONALS. Because Samoa and Swain Island are within the UNITED STATES. born abroad without the UNITED STATES, is the nation of several States, the home of U.S.Nationals (AMERICAN STATE NATIONALS). the issue is people assume born abroad means somewhere outside our continental states, like overseas or something. That is not what it means. It means anything without the UNITED STATES (DC AND THE TERRITORIES AND MILITARY ENCLAVES).

      Delete
    73. What is ABROAD?
      A geographical land considered foreign to the current location of a person or object. This term can apply to overseas and continental difference.

      Delete
    74. Freeman please take your time and read what I posted. All 14th Amendment U.S. citizens are also considered U.S. nationals. But not all U.S. nationals are considered 14th Amendment U.S. citizens.

      Delete
    75. You folks are all over the place. It is impossible to even have a reasonable conversation with most of you. I feel the divide is only increasing with time to a point where you all are living in an alternate reality as opposed to the status quo (society-at-large).

      It's all good until you start injuring the law and thus a juridic society or injure people with actions based on your ideologies.

      Delete
    76. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    77. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    78. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    79. In this context, abroad means anywhere besides the 50 states, D.C., Samoan Islands, and Swains Island.

      If you were born anywhere but these locations, then you were born abroad.

      If your parents are both 14th Amendment U.S. citizens (also known as U.S. nationals) and you were born abroad as defined above, then you can claim to be a U.S. national.

      If you were born in one of the 50 states, D.C., Samoan Islands, or Swains Island, then you are considered a U.S. national even if you are a 14th Amendment U.S. citizen.

      If one of your parents isn't a U.S. national and the other is and you were born in one of the 50 states, D.C., Samoan Islands, or Swains Island, then you are considered a U.S. national.

      14th Amendment citizenship is like an enhancement to being a U.S. national. A great analogy to this would be having a commercial drivers license as opposed to having a normal license.

      If you have a commercial drivers license, you may drive cars and truck. But with a normal license, you can only drive cars. Normal license is equitable to U.S. nationality. Commercial license is equitable to U.S. nationality + 14th Amendment U.S. citizenship.

      By default, if you are a 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, then you are also a U.S. national.

      There are cases where you can be a U.S. national and not be a 14th Amendment U.S. citizen.

      Delete
    80. So basically Gurus like Anne have got all your minds screwed up to the point that you pay her for her bullshit advise. You also voluntarily renounce your citizenship and potentially commit perjury while doing so.

      And then you get accused of breaking the law by law enforcement and try to argue your case on the street where it is impossible to adjudicate matters (the cop is not a judge). Then you appear in court only to alienate yourselves in the only venue there is to actually defend yourselves. You guy's minds are so trashed and scattered it is beyond me to even comprehend. This can only be the magnificent work of the Society of Jesus. To have people so out of touch with reality that they become their own worse enemies hahahaahaha!

      Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam. For the Greater Glory of God.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zORm-uAGmQ

      Delete
    81. DOS is probably forwarding all your paperwork to the FBI hahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!

      Best way to gather intel is to gather voluntary info. They know that many of you were born in the 50 states or D.C.

      So they make you think every thing is fine and that you are able to renounce your 14th Amendment U.S. citizenship. They even follow through with your desires. But make no mistake. They are now privy to you and have their sights set on you. They have a nice database of "Sovereign Citizens" thanks to Anne's paperwork.

      So go ahead and commit perjury (claim that you were born abroad, or born in Samoa or Swains, or that one of your parents is not a U.S. national. I'd bet the house that the Feds are keeping tabs on you all who submitted that paperwork. The Feds are sharing data with local and State Law Enforcement as well as IRS. Don't say you haven't been warned.

      Delete
    82. 3 main identities: 1.) Nativity: born aboard, is the American State National (unincorporated) living soul, FBI HAS ABSOLUTELY NO CONTROL OF SUCH, WHY? BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL AND TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE FBI. UCADIA is committing fraud, to threaten people from not from using their rights. 2.) birth certificate issued for U.S. National, showing a birth abroad in the unincorporated these united states occurred. it's not called a birth certificate...its called a certificate of LIVE BIRTH. there's a legal difference. a U.S. NATIONAL AT BIRTH DOES NOT GET A BIRTH CERTIFICATE, THEY GET A CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH. WHY? learn the difference because ACADIA IS COMMITTING FRAUD AGAINST YOU by electronic communications.(Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 8 (1954). Lucifer was a murderous liar from the beginning that's who UCADIA serves as a Jesuit. Don't believe anything he says. 3.)U.S. Citizen has nothing to do with a live birth, no live birth certificate is issued to a U.S. National. Who was born on the continent and has a Birth Certificate? NO ONE! Why? Because you were not born in the U.S. you were naturalized.You don't have a U.S. BIRTH CERTIFICATE! Why? Because you were born abroad. Your RECORD of LIVE BIRTH, is a Certificate of Live Birth, issued by your home state. That makes you a state citizen not a U.S. CITIZEN. Your nativity was on the land of a State. Procedures for your NATURALIZED, pursuant to U.S. LAW is you would get a state issued certificate not a U.S. issued certificate. You are not a natural U.S. CITIZEN. There is a difference between natural U.S. CITIZEN and Naturalized U.S. CITIZEN. There is a difference between birth certificate and certificate of live birth. There is a difference between a natural citizen of the nation and a naturalized citizen of the nation. YOU ARE A NATURAL CITIZEN OF THE NATION OF STATES UNITED. Samoans and Swain Islands are naturalized citizens of our nation. There is a difference between United States Citizen and UNITED STATES CITIZEN. There is a difference between a United States Citizen and a CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES. When the TERM: OF is used, it means belonging to the authority of something. Something has authority over it. These definitions are throughout US AND USC STATUTES and RULINGS BY THE SUPREME COURTS, FEDERAL AND STATE. This is the manipulation. This is how liars and deceives like UCADIA and the God he serves (Lucifer) continue to cause people to walk in darkness.

      Delete
    83. PAUL STAMER, please take notice, of my official notice to UCADIA

      NOTICE: OF ALLEGED CRIMES AND TO CEASE AND DESIST:
      ON AND FOR THE RECORD:
      USE OF TERMS IN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, THAT THREATEN AND ARE USED TO DEFRAUD OTHERS OF RIGHTS, BENEFITS AND PRIVILEGES AFFORDED THEM WITHIN THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE UNITED STATES AND THE STATES OF.
      On July 1, 2018 at 11:05 PM, PERSON AND/OR PERSONS KNOWN AS UCADIA Ecclesia Foundation made threats and innuendos of physical threats to People and Persons on the forum Paul Stamer Lincoln County Watch, in a scheme to defraud said People and Persons of rights, benefits and privileges. His use of said terms, has, the ability to cause fear, duress and threat, to persons both legal and natural. UCADIA Ecclesia Foundation used such terms combined with other fraudulent communications, upon said forum to further his fraudulent scheme against other forum participates.
      UCADIA Ecclesia Foundation was given written warning, via C.JOHNSON on forum blog entitled “Confusion About the Indemnity Bond” in comments on evening of July 1, 2018. He did not heed such warnings to cease and desist, but in lieu of warning, made said threat, above listed.
      Official notice is given this day, for said person and/or persons known as UCADIA Ecclesia Foundation, to cease and desist with both unlawful and illegal behavior of fraud and use of threats. If such acts do not cease and desist, intent will be recorded and a criminal complaint for violations of U.S.C. 18-242 and fraud 18 U.S. Code § 1001 . Recording of said threat against forum participates has been made and is copied on and for the record.
      Fraud is defined legally as: A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.
      PROOF OF FRAUD: five separate elements (1) a false statement of a material fact (2.) knowledge on the part of the defendant that the statement is untrue (3) intent on the part of the defendant to deceive the alleged victim (4) justifiable reliance by the alleged victim on the statement and (5) injury to the alleged victims as a result
      This NOTICE is given, to advise UCADIA Ecclesia Foundation to cease and desist, in its unlawful and illegal behavior. If such behavior continues, it is now on the record as intent to commit crimes.



      Delete
    84. UCADIA, You err in thinking, I am brainwashed. I am not, I have taken my mind back and I know the difference. Either you stop spewing your fraud on this forum, or else I am going to report you. Yes, I agree, the feds are watching and I am glad. Are you? You need to cease and desist with your scheme to defraud the American State Nationals, of their rights. Your scheme is exposed. I told you that last night.It's over for you!Finished! Are you too foolish to listen!You are a bigger liar than the ones you serve. At least they make the differences in their laws, you go further than that to defraud, you pretend the differences do not even exist. You have taken their fraud, their scheme and expounded on it to make your own fraud and scheme. You are despicable and unconscionable. Your claim to have anything to do with the light of Jesus Christ is fraud. You are a demonic filled liar and you are being exposed. It is finished for you. It is over! A true follower of Christ, with wisdom from the most high has come!You better understand, what is happening between you and I is happening in the spirit, right now and not in the natural world. But, you are going to pay the consequences in the natural world, if you persist. Because I am going to file a criminal complaint if you continue. You better heed this notice.Your actions have gone way beyond, social media guidelines. You are now making threats via your post July 1, 2018 at 11:05 pm. Don't do it again. By the way I have made a copy of that threat, I am now keeping a record of your criminal activity. I have a record of that comment!You either come back to the level of social media or you leave this forum. But, if you think you are going to threaten people on this forum and cause fear and trembling in people by your use of terms and get by with it you have another think coming. Your communicates on this forum are fraud and are being exposed and your threats are being exposed. Your fraud I can handle as a social media issue, but your fraud combined with threat is an entirely different issue. I know the difference! Cease and desist, your time is up! Your heavy handed fraudulent mis-use of terms will not be tolerated.

      Delete
    85. Ummm I hope that you realize that all the deleted posts contained errors. But they are archived nevertheless. You claim that I threatened you? Exactly what was the threat?
      I have the entire conversation archived on Internet Archive Wayback Machine.

      Delete
    86. I did not claim you threatened me, there is your darkness once again, twisting truth. But, I am not going to explain it, you have been noticed, warning has been given. cease and desist and I don't give a crap about your wayback machine archive and don't try to use it as a threat of any kind against me. I know the truth, but if you make another comment to me like you did just now, I will consider it as a legal threat. you need to cease and desist. I hope Mr. Stamer is taking notice of this! Because you need to stop!

      Delete
    87. UCADIA, MATTER OF LAW AND FACT: YOU NEED TO CEASE AND DESIST IN CONTACTING ME AT ALL. GOT IT? I KNOW YOUR GAME AND I AM ABOUT TO PLAY IT, IF YOU MAKE ANY MORE THREATS ON THIS FORUM TO ANYONE. DON'T CONTACT ME AGAIN.

      Delete
    88. PAUL STAMER: UCADIA is attempting to us intimidation against people on this forum. He just tried to use it against me in his comment July 2, 2018 at 7:48 AM. He needs to cease and desist. I am making these comments on and for the record.

      Delete
    89. I don't understand. You just stated that I made threats. I'd like to know what exactly constitutes a threat in your book? Trying to get people to think for themselves is a threat? Warning people about the origin of the ideas that they subscribe to is a threat? Warning them of "potential" illegality of their actions?

      Don't you get it? The ideas that you subscribe to are designed for your downfall. Inherent within the ideas that you subscribe to is a self destruct mechanism.

      The point I am trying to make is that one will have a hard time getting away with breaking statutory laws.

      Delete
    90. UCADIA, READ MY OFFICIAL WARNING. THEN YOU BETTER LEARN ABOUT 'PERCEIVED THREATS'. YOU ARE WALKING ON VERY SHAKY GROUND. TAKE THE WARNING AND ACT ACCORDINGLY OR DON'T. I KNOW THE POINTS YOUR ARE MAKING. I KNOW YOU TOOK SOME OF YOUR COMMENTS DOWN BECAUSE THEY WERE IN ERROR. THAT STUFF IS NOT THE ISSUE. READ THE OFFICIAL WARNING. READ MY LAST COMMENTS TO YOU. FYI, I HAVE ALREADY USED MY IDEAS. TESTED TRIED IN COURT, WON. I TOLD YOU BEFORE, BUT YOU DON'T LISTEN. I AM EXPERIENCE. GET IT! I DON'T GIVE A RIP ABOUT YOUR COMMENTS. I HOPE PEOPLE WILL READ THEM AND GO RIP THEM APART BY COMPARING THEM WITH ACTUAL LAW. THEN THEY WILL FIND OUT THE TRUTH ABOUT YOU FOR THEMSELVES. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO YOUR OPINIONS AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH. IT WAS NOT ALL YOUR COMMENTS, TO WHICH I TOOK OFFENSE. IT WAS THE PERCEIVED THREAT YOU MADE,TO WHICH I GAVE YOU OFFICIAL WARNING. DID YOU TAKE THE WARNING? NO! YOU MADE ANOTHER COMMENT TO ME ABOUT THE WAYBACK MACHINE! I GAVE YOU A SECOND WARNING, NON-OFFICIAL. BUT IF YOU DO IT AGAIN, I WILL ISSUE AN OFFICIAL WARNING ON THAT ACTION. AGAIN, I DON'T GIVE A CRAP ABOUT YOUR COMMENTS, THEY ARE LIES AND PEOPLE WHO DO RESEARCH AND THINK FOR THEMSELVES WILL FIGURE IT OUT. NO DON'T CONTACT ME AGAIN. THERE IS NOTHING ELSE TO EXPLAIN.

      Delete
    91. Agents abound! Here is a taste of truth.

      Born alive is any product born of mother:

      The pope says man is man=status. A record of man is slavery-never happened. A child is not a man and birth=space or tomb.

      3. is telling us this child is a succession as in a line/ledger and where does the State tell us where this child is found/ling, "on a pre-scribed form" ORC.3705.11
      Definition of born

      1 a : brought forth by or as if by birth The baby was born prematurely. She was born in Germany. a mentality born in the computer age
      b : native —usually used in combination American-born
      c : deriving or resulting from a partnership born of necessity —usually used in combination poverty-born crime
      2 a : having from birth specified qualities was born blind Mark Twain was born Samuel Clemens. a born leader
      b : being in specified circumstances from birth nobly born born poor born into wealth
      3 : destined from or as if from birth born to succeed

      Delete
    92. cube, you did it again. loved this 'A record of man is slavery-never happened' AND THE FOUND/LING. I've been teaching my sister about claiming the land her home is on. I said, they took all the land into possession in 1933 because they were bankrupt and decided to take everything from us, as if that bankruptcy was ours. It wasn't it was the bankruptcy of the U.S., INC. Then they put everything in trust for the Americans under FINDERS KEEPERS. They found it and now they are holding onto it until the real owner shows up to claim (make claim) for it. The issue is in most cases the real owner never shows up because they don't know FINDERS KEEPERS is what happened in 1933. This is why it is so important to do ANNA's paperwork. All the stuff is in a FINDERS KEEPERS box right now. All the assets of America are in those B/C TRUSTS. Actually in the case of American's its not a B/C its a certificate of LIVE BIRTH. BORN ALIVE ON AMERICAN SOIL. You might like this, about the transfer of U.S., INC's debt to those from whom are creditors or to whom the truth has been concealed. The debt of the U.S. INC...IS IT'S OWN AND IT CAN'T BE TRANSFER WITHOUT FULL KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT OF THE DEBTOR TO WHICH TRANSFER IS. 28 U.S. Code § 3304.

      Delete
    93. C,

      We are in need of bringing as much knowledge as we can to the fore. I will check that out! Thank you.

      Delete
  3. Where can I find a copy of the nond

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everything said makes sense until I looked at the bond, first off it's with the Vatican, not US Treasury, so why should we expect any US court will respect or credit it? Second there's no amount, third it's for Anna personally, not others, at least not expressed, or for the respective states. Who has this worked for to date? Is there even a way to keep records for those who tried using it?

      Delete
    2. Paul, this is not the State of the Union Indemnity Bond -- RA 393427640 US Anna is talking about but an earlier issued Universal Payment Bond -- RA 393427653 US.

      Delete
    3. (Clue) The legal system is civil law through military tribunals and therefore Roman. Nomen= power of Rome-Agnomen=ghost as it is immaterial-Cognomen=machine of Rome. Now, a given name may consist of more than one word, it is one name non the less. If one name is incorporated with the family name, does that become its own organ/nation? You answer this as its obvious.

      Delete
    4. State of the Union Indemnity Bond -- RA 393427640 US is mentioned here:
      State of the Union Indemnity Bond -- RA 393427640 US
      The bond was created and you "attach to it" from what I gather in the post.

      Delete
    5. article 620 on anna's site

      State of the Union Indemnity Bond -- RA 393427640 US

      http://annavonreitz.com/privateindemnitybond.pdf

      Delete
    6. This article talks about it but it still isn't the actual bond.

      Delete
    7. Paul, looking at the RM numbers, it appears that the Indemnity Bond was issued before the UPB.

      Delete
    8. 1FreeMan, I would like to have a conversation with you about income tax. Could you please contact me at the email address below?

      livingspiritualman@gmail.com

      I know you most likely have a busy schedule, so I will keep it as short as possible.

      Delete
  4. The Birth certificate is a public record showing the organization was organized, showing it exist. This registered organization, a state agency, was created during the “registration of birth reports and documents” mentioned in KRS 213.046 (1) and 213.051. This Created the “matrix”.see Bl.5th

    When You used the Certificate, you became the registered agent and accepted appointment for service of process, your home is now the registered office and you have just complied with some of the requirements mentioned in KRS 14A.

    So, While this author cannot go to great lengths to provide the reader of the authorities proving enormous legal ramifications for use of instruments and the legal relationships of the registered agent, this author merely wishes to direct some interested persons to the obvious and easiest remedies available.
    If one does not wish to operate an entity, or be a registered agent for an organization, the remedy is simple. A letter of resignation.
    Upon the 31st day of receipt of the letter of resignation, you will no longer be the agent for service of process. They cannot serve you process when it is addressed to the entity. Unless the secretary of state has a statement on file signed by the agent accepting the appointment for service of process, service of process is not effective and insufficient , to wit:
    14A.4-010bRegistered office and registered agent required
    (2) Unless the registered agent signs the document making the appointment, the
    appointment of the registered agent or a successor registered agent on whom
    process may be given is not effective until the agent delivers a statement in
    writing to the Secretary of State accepting the appointment.

    And as for the resignation,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent explanation and the letter bellow is BRILLIANT! It is just what I needed for my friend. I will treasure it for myself too and use it when I need it. Thank you very much.

      Delete
  5. 14A.4-030bResignation of registered agent.
    (1) A registered agent may resign the appointment by signing and delivering a
    statement of resignation to the Secretary of State for filing that may also
    provide that the registered office is discontinued.
    (2) After filing the statement, the Secretary of State shall mail one (1) copy to the
    registered office, if not discontinued, and the other copy to the entity or foreign
    entity at its principal office.
    (3) The agency appointment shall be terminated, and the registered office
    discontinued, if so provided, on the earlier of:
    (a) The appointment of a successor registered agent and, if applicable,
    registered office; or
    (b) The thirty-first day after the date on which the statement of resignation
    was filed.
    Now for those wanting some other options as resignation may not be a viable choice, your duties and obligations are simple, again, to wit:
    14A.4-050bObligations of registered agent.
    The duties of a registered agent are to:
    (1) Forward to the entity or foreign entity for which it is the registered agent any
    service of process, notice, or demand received on its behalf; and
    (2) Collect and maintain the information described in KRS 14A.4-010(3).
    As agent for the entity, you are the secured party and creditor. See UCC definitions, secured party, creditor. You are a secured party creditor.
    I would also state that it is an organization having more than 1 place of business. As we did not issue the bonds controlled by mutual fund managers such as Blackrock and Wells Fargo. Given this fact, please see UCC 9-307. The organization is a debtor and UCC 9-307 determines the location of the debtor.
    Once you know where the chief executive office is, maybe now you know where to send all service of process, notices and demands to, that being the main obligations of the registered agent.
    That being said, here is an example of a LETTER OF RESIGNATION.

    STATEMENT OF RESIGNATION
    From:
    (name)
    (place)
    To:
    (secretary of state's name)
    Secretary of State for (corporation state) i.e. STATE OF OHIO
    (Address)

    Re: Resignation pursuant to KRS 14A.4-030.

    Greetings (Mr. or Mrs. Secretary's Name),

    This Statement of Resignation and Claim of Right is presented for filing and shall constitute a public deed record presented for filing.
    Whereas certain facts have become known, specifically and particularly the Creation of a Registered Organization having the name (ALL CAPS NAME) and evidence by the Mark, Token, Proof called a Certificate of Birth, being a public record showing the organization was organized, showing it exist, and, Whereas the legal name of that registered organization, a state agency, is styled (ALL CAP NAME), and, Whereas said Facts have caused some agents to believe a legal impossibility, and, Whereas I do not wish to operate any state or government agency, foreign or domestic,
    I hereby resign from any real or presumed state or government agency or organization, and will no longer accept service of process, demands or notices addressed to said organization, as registered agent. I hereby resign from the capacity of registered agent and now assume the person, office, and capacity of general executor of the estate of the agency until persons claiming an interest in the organization or the estate thereof, make themselves known.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Any and all real or presumed Power of Attorney Claimed by any Person is hereby revoked, rescinded and made Void. Any State, Government, Office, Officer, Agency or Agent Shall not conduct the affairs of the Organization without the expressed written Consent of the General executor of the Estate as of this day.
    I, (your name), hereby authorize, warrant, and demand that all business and transactions being done within (STATE OF XXXXX), and using the legal name or legal entity identifiers (LEIs) associated with the registered organization cease. Any and all persons under your office are hereby given notice, no office, officer, agency or agent shall in any way operate or conduct any affairs of the organization without the expressed written consent of the acting general executor as of this day.
    I am also requesting a full accounting of the organizational accounts to determine the condition and solvency of the organization. Please forward to the executor's office a certified copy of any accounts known by your office or other agency, or in your possession, including any and all funds, trusts, UCC finance statements, liens, encumbrances, and judgments, etc., concerning the organization. This is a legal request for an accounting of the organization.
    To Clarify, I hereby resign the position of registered agent and discontinue any and all registered office(s). Please, if there are any questions of debts owed by the organization, please send all proof of claims and evidences of debt to the chief executive office of the organization for payment, setoff, discharge or settlement, or otherwise-provided for by law.

    Thank you for your service,
    ________________________
    (seal, signature)
    Address
    =========================
    _________________________
    Acting Executor
    address for office of the executor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Man can kill all presumptions he acts without the State capacity, State capacity must be provided in some form, or just try not responding to (electric bills etc) and make no mistake, you will be forced to bring this issue to one of their courts! We may have capacity to be heard, but who in that club is going to comply with law when contrary to corporate interests?

      Delete
  7. sorry, couldn't get the article in one post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jill; thank you for posting. This is very interesting and makes a lot of sense to me. Can you provide the site of the original article and who's "kw"?

      Delete
    2. Jill, Anna's editable forms does this and more. I love you comment though, it shows you are understanding or do understand the PERSON (identities). When people understand they have more than one identity in law, they have multiply and those identities have titles and they take the control of the identities and the titles of those identities, they take back their own power. The first place to start, Anna's editable forms, take the identities back to your own control. Then fill your office of PRIVATE, UNINCORPORATED DBA AND POWER OF ATTORNEY. If you do, no one else can sign anything using your name, because you have told them you are the power of attorney. Right now, anyone can use your name if you haven't brought it back to the land. Your name belongs to a dead person and no one is using it or making claim to it. Thus Anna's forms. Game changer, go get all your names and their titles, bring them home. Never send them out again until you know how to use them and for what purposes they will be used. Don't sign anything again with your eyes closed!

      Delete
    3. PS. the government uses the names of dead people everyday, to fine the public for all kinds of stuff like traffic violations. They call a dead person's name and someone in the court stands and says: THAT'S ME! Or they will send a bill to a dead person and someone will agree to be that person and pay that bill every time. OK THEN,IF YOU AGREE TO BE DEAD, THEY WILL LET YOU! Every time they need or want more money, they will repeat the process. Whose going to stop them? The dead can't speak or represent themselves in court! No 'BODY' is there to represent the dead person. The BAR attorneys work for the court! Poor dead person, no Power of Attorney, no beneficiary to the trust, no grantee, nothing! Man, whats a dead person to do, to stop the use of their name? Anybody have any solutions?

      Delete
    4. Hi C.Johnson, do have you an example/template for the POWER OF ATTORNEY that will stop "them" using our names. Thanks.

      Delete
    5. BB if you will google: POWER OF ATTORNEY FORMS, there are plenty on line that you will be able to use online. all you have to do is find one you like and fill in the blanks. I gave all power to my POA and it cost 15. to RECORD in my county public records. I love my POA. It wears lots of hats (titles). All power is given to it by me! It does a great job representing me. It's decisions are final, unless one of my accounts hurts or injures someone and proof of said claim can be presented to the court.

      Delete
    6. b.b. per kelli, here's a great term: https://definitions.uslegal.com/e/expilatio/
      this is what I was saying in my comment. someone has to represent the dead person. someone has to claim its name. anna's forms claim it and the POA empowers the whole thing as the AMERICAN ON THE LAND.

      Delete
    7. C,J. Correction needed, It was Cube sphere who brought the term "expilatio" forward, not I.
      Great contribution Cube, Thank you so much!

      Delete
  8. Dear Anna,
    Where can one find the court qualified "copy of your State of the Union Indemnity Bond.." thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Replies
    1. this is the wrong bond. Paul, check with Anna to see if she has a copy of the original State of the Union Indemnity Bond -- RA 393427640 US xxxx where xxxx = state of birth

      Delete
  10. "Jill" is on the right track here. The moment the State creates its foundling child/person, it can contract. Living people through this power of appointment now means the State acts and not the man. A statement/pro-claimation/letter/ledger can be answered by the State, the State has trustees that take care of its business. Without this appointment, all matters concerning this legal name are without legal capacity and then, a trustee is appointed to handle it, and for lack of capacity, we can't be heard. The creditor as Jill points out becomes the debtor by default, the trustee finds the office of creditor empty and simply puts the debt on people without power of appointment and it keeps the profit/prophet. The people have been separated from holding State capacity, thats why the administrator steps in as trustee for the State and this is part of the reason the bankers say the union States have been abandoned! "State vs debtor" Criminality as its finest.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The way I see it IS the "State of the Union Indemnity Bond" (Private Script) IS our Insurance in our Internationally commercial "Protected Person" Legal Private Entity Trade Name Capacity.

    Our birthright Sovereign, self governed, Lawful Public standing/capacity on the land/soil IS our Lawful personal responsibility to Insure our own public Acts/Deeds in Lawful substance/real value( 21.00 pre 1933 Silver Dollars and/or 21.00 Postage dollar denominated, substance backed Stamps) for Lawful 100% Security In Bonding our Words and deeds with true value, intentions and integrity.


    Any man or woman wishing to serve/speak in a Public Capacity as "representative" of any "Public Office" for the living state Land Jurisdiction ONLY, MUST prove themselves to be qualified as having True Bonded Standing/Capacity and 100% Lawful Liability to even be considered by Qualified Electors (Lawful Bonded Land/Soil Standing and Capacity) to begin with. Period. Must Prove Allegiance and financial Competency In Lawful Standing/Capacity and 100% Liability to Serve others Public Interests accordingly and personally accountable and responsibly. NO MORE "PUBLIC" IMMUNITY, Period.


    It's time we ALL get personally responsible and Honest In ALL our Acts and Deeds Now and moving forward. We Must INsure our own words and deeds Now and back them up with our own personal accountability of Real Substance backing our Standing/Capacity AT ALL Times, from here on out. Buy your $21 pre 1933 Silver Dollars, put it up as the REAL Substance backing of your words and deeds, and have Lawful standing and qualified Elector/Chief Executor Capacity on the Land and as rightful Captain of your Ship at Sea, fully balanced and Bonded to operate accordingly in both.

    1Freeman, you mentioned to Eve in a previous post about purchasing and obtaining 21 pre 1933 Silver Dollars and creating a Silver Bond. Would you please show us the proper wording and format to effectively create this very important and valuable Public/Private Insurance bond? I believe this IS Key for our proper standing/capacity and moving forward!!! Time to back up our own words with Real Substance!


    Thank You!!


    Much Gratitude, Love and Peace Now


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. C. JohnsonJune 30, 2018 at 11:35 AM
      Kelli, great thinking, in your comment about the bond. But, here's a question for you to think further: "YOU JUST DESCRIBED AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE, WHERE DID SUCH PROCEDURE GETS ITS EXISTENCE/ORIGIN? The reason I am asking you is this, do you have rights? If you have rights can administrative procedure abrogate your rights? See, is it not true you are submitting to requirements to which you are not subject? What if you go to court and the judge makes a decision to override your administrative procedure? What would happen to the bond then? I mean can you find anywhere in law in:fact, that procedure is a lawful defense against the administrators? I know what you are saying, but is it truth in:fact? Have you tested it in several administrative courts and did it work? I am concerned for people doing this and not fully understanding the implications of it. I don't know if the foundation of it is ROCK SOLID.here's what we know is rock solid: U.S.C. TITLE 8, THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION,THE MAGNA CARTA, THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, THE STATE CONSTITUTIONS, U.S.C. TITLE 18, COMMON LAW, CFR, UCC,COURT PROCEDURES, AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE. There are no short cuts or maneuvers out of their system. The rules of the game: are the rules of the game. Learn the rules of the game and then you can play and win, then you can legally and lawfully exit the courts of the administrators and help them come into right standing with you on your land.

      Delete
    3. Here you go, Kelli.
      https://www.dropbox.com/s/1gqpog1ukzb2hse/Silver%20Bond%20The%20Case%20Process.docx?dl=0

      Delete
    4. BTW, when you file your own silver bond into your case, you won't have to piggyback on Anna's bond and you will be the only one in the court with a bond of substance and real money based on article 1 section 10 of the Constitution.

      Delete
    5. Fact: Lawful Substance backed bonding of living people in possession of Real Money "Trumps" Fake, Foreign and FICTITIOUS PAPER and "ACTORS/AGENTS" AS FOREIGN PRIVATE ENTITY "ADMINISTRATORS" and any and ALL of their pushing of FAKE MONEY "INSTRAMENTS" ALL DAY, Every Day IN Every way. Yes? or No?

      What IS your purpose in "Coming home" back on land if not to reconvene our Lawful Land Courts In Fact, and electing and filling our Public servant offices at the State and National levels by qualified, competetent living men and woman that serve ONLY to Protect our Lawful rights of peaceful self governance and secure our Private property rights from FOREIGN Governments and their "Hired Help/AGENT" Trespass or Infringement?

      We are Now Co Creating our New & Peaceful World are we not?
      We must peacefully co-exist for now. No competition. ALL Jurisdictions right now are necessary, but THEIRS IS LIMITED and RESTRICTED on Purpose and WE Will hold them to Account.
      So I ask you, will that be accomplished by going backwards and re-creating the same wheel that got us here in the first place, or will we re assemble united as the living people and make All the necessary amendments needed so that THIS Infringement & Trespass Stops Now and IS not ever repeated? Its Absolutely Amendment Time of OLD WORLD Scarcity/possessive thinking Documents and outdated beliefs. What say you?

      Delete
    6. I was granted a private trust from the State's person as heir and beneficiary through Registered mail.number which becomes the master file number. This was then placed in a private trust with lawful consideration, pre-1933 Silver Dollar, Grantor Of Dominion/in God we trust. This is recorded and can't be barred in court. It can't be heard in public either. Administrative remedy must be exhausted before the matter goes before a special master. Everything we do must be without deficiency or will be tossed out. Think hard on this. There is no remedy on the administrative side, its at the door of law, not in law.

      Delete
    7. Thank you very much !Freeman and Cube sphere, I hear you both and I am humbled and grateful! Cube the private Trust IS the direction husband and I are heading and creating Now for our estates, and agreed much to learn still and consider Always. Insanity IS ever thinking/believing we have or ever had a remedy in their Corrupt, Self serving, greedy, ADMINISTRATIVE BEAST SYSTEM to begin with.


      Time to correct these mistakes Now, learn and grow from them and stay focused on moving forward peacefully In honor and truth Now!

      Much Gratitude, Love and Peace Be




      Delete
    8. Kelli, please show me the facts you mentioned in your post about the silver bond. If such exists, It will help us all to understand. The issue is, can it be proven. This isn't about opinion. This is about safety for all. My concern: people will attempt to use such in court and the administrators will eat their lunch. Some of us as individuals have power and know how to use it, but we are not in control of the whole, yet. We have to have tested and tried and true methods, if the masses are going to follow the truth. That silver bond procedure, is it tested and tried and true. Can it be used lawfully and legally to bring the power back to the one standing in front of the judge? Or is it something, people are going to try to use and end up in trouble? Let's be wise and do no harm. I have seen only the procedure, but where is the authority? What is going to make an administrator, ceded the power of the court back to someone in the court, by using that bond?

      Delete
    9. Everyone, I just want to give some food for thought about the bond (21 pieces of silver). Everyone is trying to figure out how to win in court. You can't win in court. It is impossible the deck is stacked against us and they have taken possession of the courts. That is the issue. Until we re-establish our states and our courts, we still have to play in their courts by their rules. It is their game, right now. The only power we have is our rights. That's it. All the other stuff is baloney. What each of us has to do is re-establish our rights on the land. You do that by Anna's editable forms. At this moment, must people in court have no rights. why? only the dead person had the rights. That person does not exist in the court, until either they show back up alive or their representative shows up. The name that is called in court, is only a name on an account. But, there is no one alive who controls that account other than the head administer in the court. that head administer is the executor, trustee, power of attorney, everything regarding the account, until a TRUE AND LIVING owner or heir or representative shows up. If any of them show up they have to have the legal paperwork to prove it. That paperwork has to be on the record, prior to being in court. If that owner, heir or representative is not in place, it doesn't matter if you have a bond, its useless and backed by nothing. because the head court administer is still in charge. the bond is not going to move the head administrator out of its position, until rightful owner, heir or POA shows up. then the administrator has to yield authority over the account. If the account, has harmed or injured anyone than the POA, heir or owner can demand proof of claim so the claim can be settled. The account (the name called) can not defend its self. It is a corporate entity and can not speak or be heard. It tries to and then gets ignored. why because corporate entities are not living souls or natural people. They are a fiction. The bond is not going to change that situation. The only thing the bond (21. pieces of silver) would do is protect the legal fiction, but its not going to free it from court or from whatever the administrator is going to do. The administrator can say, it's only 21 pieces of silver owned by a legal fiction. Bank of America and the IMF are legal fictions/persons and they have a lot more silver than just 21. pieces. But, bank of america can not show up in court, it has to send a figure head to represent it. Neither can the legal fiction named after you. It has to have a representative. Do I like this crap? Heck no! but it is what we have right now, as the courts are not under our control yet!

      Delete
    10. C, the key here is subrogation which you have a right to whether you use their bond which they filed in your name w/o your consent, or your silver bond. You begin by asking the judge: "Will the plaintiff certify my right of subrogation?" And watch them try to circumnavigate it at all cost. You ask 3 times and then ask: "Are you denying me my right of subrogation?' If the judge and plaintiff pretend that there is no bond, you ask them to confirm that there is no bond and have the judge confirm it. Then you say "well then that is a real problem for you judge now isn't it? That means that you are accepting all liability in these proceedings, is that what you are saying?" Watch him squirm and then continue "Well then it is a good thing that I have already deposited my own silver bond into this court. Judge I appoint you as fiduciary and trustee on this bond to settle this matter and eliminate the record. Does the plaintiff have any objections?" Let the plaintiff argue and disagree all he wants and when he is done simply say "your honor, i have a copy of my silver bond right here as well as the substance that backs it (bang your box of 21 silver dollars on the table) to bond my claim.
      Would the plaintiff please present his bond for my inspection so that I can see who will indemnify me if I am damaged? O, he did not bring a bond to bond his claim? Then, your honor, I move to dismiss this case under FRCP 12 (b)6.

      Delete
    11. 1freeman, now that is what I was looking for is how the bond applies to the current administrative procedures and how it can be used to take power away. I have seen this so much on the net, but it was missing the rock to stand on. You just provided the rock. Thank you for sharing it. I don't think I personally would use it. But, people needed to know what you posted, in case they do. I prefer to take control of the court by using my P.O.A. and taking the power from the head admin, that way. So many methods. We just have to be certain, the rock to stand on is in place. I can see now how this procedure would work. Thanks!

      Delete
    12. Ps. 1freeman, do you have a copy of the bond for those who would like to use this method?

      Delete
    13. My pleasure, C. I like your POA strategy and can see it apply to many situations. Would you mind sharing how you set it up and put it to use?

      Delete
    14. I did anna's forms. then I did a POA and RECORDED it, with the county. I was married legally and divorced. so I used my last legal name change-the divorce to be my POA, DBA, EXECUTOR, BENEFICIARY (HEIR), SIGNATORY, (WHATEVER). Then I chose one identity to be my public dba (unincorporated). (my POA is my private dba)both public and private have small and large letters. All of these titles are unincorporated now because of Anna's paperwork. So all I really did was change everything from their prior corporate status to the unincorporated status and recorded the proof on and for the record. I recorded it all by registered mail with sec. of states (state of and federal) and the head county administrator and the POA with the county records. the county administrator made an administrative (choice) decision to not register anna's forms. When I told her what I was doing, she knew exactly what it was and refused to accept it. (so they know). I came up and looked up statutes, could find nothing giving her the right to make such decision. I found statute SC title 30 where all state, county, city employees are responsible for public records. I wrote a letter to the county administrator told him the story and thanked him for being the recorder of my common law records (my right) and he was obligated to record them in the state archives, sent him the recorded registered. Then I mailed the originals to my self, envelope is unopened. Now, I have records in 4 places: 2 in state, 1 federal and one USPS. Now, I have reclaimed my identities (all 27) out of their corporate status and into unincorporated status and I have filled the office of POA and executor and whatever else I want to do. It's undisputable, because I have a paper trial, which includes: POA, voter de-registration, divorce decree, marriage license and B/C.(I have all those records bound now.) (ALL THE NAME CHANGES OF THE B/C.) The POA has to have 2 witnesses before you try to file it with the county. So everything has to be witnessed. Now, I am the lawful and the legal power over all the accounts all the way back to the b/c issuance date (6 days after my nativity). On those accounts there is no higher authority pursuant to laws within the USA, US and STATES OF. The POA is my TRUE AND LIVING (not dead) REPRESENTATIVE. All the other identities the POA creates or controls are only identities on accounts and now are all unincorporated accounts, not operating in commerce. for those identities to harm or injure anyone, claim would need to be made against an account, POA can demand proof of claim. I can't remember the last time my bank account hurt or injured anyone. By changing status with sec. of states (state and fed.) all that did was tell them all those entities (27 of them) are non-commercial, which is outside the jurisdiction of the U.S.INC. That's truly all it did, it claimed the names operate in no U.S.,INC. commercial capacity and all business or trade they do is local and is not part of interstate commerce. Now, if

      Delete
    15. any other claim is made, the proof is on the record in 4 places. That goes for the driver's license, too. It's now non-commercial. If they claim it's commercial, I have the proof it is only used privately and not in any commercial capacity. Since I am presenting myself now by the POA, true and living, they have no authority to change my accounts or how I use them. FYI, most states won't register private DBA's with the secretary of State. because they are exempt from U.S. laws. When doing anna's forms the reason the admin.of public records didn't want to take them, is because I was recording private dba's. Nobody in the state wants to touch them and put them on the record! gee, I wonder why?LOL!So I sent them registered mail anyway, thanks to SC title 30 and my common law rights. Ps. My rights, can not be abrogated by administrative law and/or procedures. My rights are common law. Right to record in the public is common law right, that trumps administrative law, practices, decisions, ideas, opinions, viewpoints of any and all administrators. Don't use the word REGISTER, I NEVER REGISTER ANYTHING. REGISTER IS COMMERCIAL. I RECORD, ALWAYS: ON THE RECORD. RECORD IS NON-COMMERCIAL, COMMON LAW. RECORD IS A RIGHT. REGISTER IS NOT, IT IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE.

      Delete
    16. the above comments by me, is founded on a rock, not on sinking sand. The rock is laws within the USA and the US and the states of and the states. the terms and the authority they possess is found in all those laws and within American Jurisprudence (court rulings of Article 3 courts). None of this is trying to manipulate the system, as it is the system that founded all these titles and names and positions and everything else associated with it. the issue is this, most Americans have not known what is in the laws or how to use them. So many legislative acts, regulations and rules is overwhelming. This is why it is so important to make sure we stay within the laws and research and learn. None of Anna's editable forms are illegal or unlawful. They simply change status...they make a claim...to move jurisdictions. That is all they do! it is that simply! The POA, simply says, I AM THE ONLY AUTHORITY OVER ALL THE IDENTITIES THAT WERE CREATED BY THE USE OF MY B/C. It makes the claim you have come back from the dead, in one form or another, (ie..executor, beneficiary, whatever) and because you are TRUE AND LIVING, all rights of all the accounts (the names) are now yours. (All the accounts: driver's license, social security, banks, whatever:they are only NAMED accounts). In this country there is commerce and non-commerce. the U.S., INC. has the authority to regulate all commerce. The only thing these simply forms do is bring you out of commerce and puts all your stuff, back to non-commerce, which is your right. When you make a trip to the store to buy bacon for breakfast, you are non-commerce. They are assuming otherwise, until you finally make the official statement on and for the record, no you are not. That is all this paperwork does. It makes an official notice to whomsoever, I am commerce exempt. You can't tax, fine or fee me for going to the store to get bacon for breakfast and I don't care how I get there, even if its in my automobile which is comsumer goods-household goods and is tax emempt. These forms, put you back into right standing with your rights and ends the assumptions of the courts that you don't have that standing. Until you take back everything to the land....YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS, NONE!Then take a sticker (like Anna said) and right RETIRED on it and stick it to your license or put U.C.C. 1-308 RIGHTS RESERVED ABOVE YOU SIGNATURE. (how small can you write it, to fit it in to the space provided?)The POA is the signatory to settle all accounts, so settle some of them dog gone it. FYI, the UCC 1-308 is international law, no state administrator can amend international law. if they say you can't write it above your name, ask them where they get the authority to amend international law and law of the United States (its been adopted by every state of)? They can't deny you: rights and equal protection and due process! stand up or fall! Your rights are founded in their law, their administrative decisions are not. Use their law, stand on it, its a rock! the more you learn and think and do and practice and live, the freer you be. THINK,THINK, THINK, ALWAYS THINK!Think for yourself and then you will know truth and the truth will set you free. Don't let anyone outside of you think and make decisions for you. This is your life. Take possession of it. Live and be free.

      Delete
    17. C, see my link to Kelli above on June 30 for a template of the silver bond and AOS (affidavit of surety). Purchase 21 pre-1933 silver dollars for about $19 each (cull grade will do just fine) on EBay and use the packing slip as a Bill of Lading and reference in and attach to the AOS. Once completed your silver bond package should be deposited into the court as 'Special Deposit", get a stamped copy back out and file it as an exhibit with your JN demanding your right of subrogation and your MTD under FRCP 12(b)6.

      Delete
    18. So, C, just to be clear, JOHN HENRY DOE, JOHN H. DOE and JOHN DOE all give POA to John Henry: Doe, individually and severally. How do they sign the POA? By printing their NAME(S)? And how would this be notarized?

      Delete
    19. Any and all the all cap names are just accounts! that's all they are, is commercial accounts. I had 27 of them from my nativity. They were created by b/c, marriage certificate, divorce decree, different back accounts, I created them in a variety of ways. some with initials, some not, I mean I had no idea none of them were me. Well, they were out there in the matrix, floating around. some being used by me and some not. So by Anna's forms, I called them all back to my control. Every last one of them to stop them from floating on the sea of commerce. None, of them had a captain of the vessel. they were just floating around aimlessly. So I said, OMG, WHAT HAVE I DONE? MY VESSELS ARE EVERYWHERE WITHOUT A CAPTAIN. Thus ANNA'S paperwork to bring them back to their home port.
      Then because in commerce, (the way it is set up) I can't go and make claim in court to them! Why? I have been ruled legally (not naturally) dead by the B/C. So, how to I put a captain on board my vessels. I use the name of a NATURAL person, who REPRESENTS ME, the living soul (remember I'm dead, I no longer have a body, only a soul). So a NATURAL person, must REPRESENT ME in court. (I mean only those who practice necromancy can talk to a soul and no one in the court would do that, because they practice righteousness and necromancy is a sin! Such a game!) So my TRUE and LIVING (NATURAL-NON DEAD)POA, takes control of all the vessels (the ships without a captain) and becomes their captain. Now the name of all NATURAL persons are large and small letters. The vessels (ships on the commercial sea) are in all capitals and many different versions and deviations. So, all the JOHN HENRY DOE, JOHN H. DOE, DOE, JOHN H. entities are only account names (SHIP/VESSEL NAMES). They are not NATURAL persons, they are LEGAL PERSONS (commercial corporate entities, created for the purpose of sailing on the sea of commerce.)What everyone needs to decide is what to do for themselves and how to use their own names. That begins with understanding whose..who and what's what! If you understand, that, then you will know what to do about the paperwork. All of us, in law, have 3 main capacities (plus others if we don't know what we are doing). We have a LIVING SOUL (DEAD-NO BODY IN WHICH TO USE IN THE COURTS TO TALK TO OTHER MEN AND WOMEN). We have a NATURAL PERSON (a lawful body, that can talk in courts to other men and women and participate in commerce if desired.) We have legal person(S)(27 in my case-oops-was I ever busy?LOL)that's the names of the accounts, in all caps. That's the accounts that might need to be settled. All of us only have one L/S (NO BODY) and just one NATURAL PERSON (ONE BODY) but many legal persons and for most people those legal persons are all U.S. CITIZENS/PERSONS subject to the laws of the U.S., INC. Now, we all have to think differently about whose who and what's what! If you understand this comment, you will know how to complete your paperwork for everything and I do mean everything. I think, it is important for us all to get 'A' captain on all of our ships on the sea, BECAUSE WHO IS THE LAWFUL COMMANDER OF A SHIP, UNLESS ITS BEING PIRATED? The Captain! Piracy is illegal. Whose your captain, 1freeman? You decide!

      Delete
    20. FYI..how I did my POA, is from my natural person, the name on the divorce decree and gave it to my office that same name all capitals. Remember I am the NATURAL PERSON, I am not the office (LEGAL PERSON), but my office is just a place, I can be contacted and to which I can make contact. The office is private and is non-commercial as it is non-income producing. It is simply, a private office for contact purposes only, for the purposes of the UNITED STATES, to make contact with me, the captain of the ships. The office can't go to court, but as the Natural Person, I am the ONLY LAWFUL representative of that office regarding all matters legal (including all accounts under the jurisdiction of that office, that are now non-U.S. CITIZENS, as are on the record in 4 different places). Any and all business/trade of that office is all PRIVATE-NON-COMMERCIAL, non-income producing and without employees, including all titles, contracts, estates, trusts, accounts, whatever). I am simply Jane Jill Doe dba JANE JILL DOE (private, unincorporated). It's so private the SECRETARY OF STATE, can't register it for the State of SC commercial purposes. It's exempt. It's just me privately do my thing, to go to the store and get bacon for breakfast in my private household goods automobile.

      Delete
    21. EVERYONE: just remember this, the legal name is always all caps, without exception. So when you are creating a legal document or signing a legal form, you are creating a legal name at that point. From that point forward, for the purposes of that legal form or document, that is how you will be identified for the implementation of that form or that document. That does not mean that is how you will be known on other forms or documents. So when creating a POA, you are creating from the private side (natural person) to the public side (its going public). The natural side is always small and large letter names. The public side is always all capital names. the private side is the NATURAL PERSON. The public side is the LEGAL PERSON. The legal person is not a natural person. It is a fiction, identifier, number, whatever. It's just how you the natural person, who signed the form as the POA, wanted to be identified (traced back to you) for all purposes legal for whatever document you signed. The legal person is never you. It's just an account, that is identified as belonging to you. A possession! If it is a document and has a legal ALL CAPS name on it, that is your possession, your account. Settle it as the POA!

      Delete
    22. C. Johnson Thanks for all your great data. Would LOVE to see and read your POA. branko_brankov@yahoo.com
      Do you possible know what is 21 silver bond equivalent to UK.
      Thanks in advance BB, a "foreigner" in UK.

      Delete
    23. C.J. if I am standing at the County Land Recorders office, clerks counter with my editable docs in hand and instructing clerk to Record the docs, how do I know they are being IN Fact recorded vs. registered? My Intent and instructions are to record the docs and nowhere does it disclose in their office that they "register" anything other than "voter registration" not legal documents. I realize a "conversion" takes place once the Sec of state become the "custodian" of the recorded docs once they are accepted, but then don't they assign them a private "registration" number via the "File Number" which creates a "security Instrument" on special deposit at that point, for which SEC OF STATE assumes TERRITORIAL Authority and Holder in due course of the now converted Instruments?
      Thanks for your consideration and sharing your thoughts, knowledge on this issue.

      Much Gratitude, Love and Peace Now

      Delete
  12. Kelli,

    Look up expilatio, thats what the State did to us, akin to intercepting the ball. Governments sole purpose is to protect property. The game is separating us from it and preventing us from claiming it. In law, (it would be a piece of cake) at law, no remedy ever existed and yet because the public law was combined with public policy in 1938, we have to exhaust policy to be able to claim a real injury!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kelli, thank you so much for that word. I did not know it, I only knew the procedures that make it work. Appreciate it and your knowledge in bringing it forward. That one is going on my list of terms, to remember and teach others how to use it. Thank you so much!

      Delete
    2. oops, my apologies cube sphere. thanks Kelli for setting the record straight. great TERM cube sphere. It linked a lot of stuff together for me. I appreciate you posting it.

      Delete
    3. Novation is the result of expilatio,
      What is NOVATION?

      Novation is the substitution of a new debt or obligation for an existing one. Civ. Code Cal. "God gave you one face, but you gave yourself another" "To be or not to be, that is the question" "God is no respecter of persons" "One mans trash is another mans treasure-y" Ever heard of an offer you can't refuse, because you are unaware an offer was made? Was the offer made from the District of Columbia? 1871 Organ-act? You may have heard of the Christ-offer from Columbia/Christoffer-Columbus sailing to the new world on the ship of State?

      Delete
  13. 1freeman, I have an idea and want to run it by you for your thoughts. I am considering, going to the end game and disqualifying the entire court from the beginning of allegations, by using Article 1.8 (1 and 9). All courts that collect fees taxes whatever are article one, administrative courts. I believe I can disqualify them by writing a letter to the prosecutor before court or if he/she wants to be difficult, in court. The first question would be: "Isn't this an article 1 administrative court, pursuant to article 1 sect 8.1 and 2?" If they say no, caught them in a the act of fraud, because they have no power to operate outside that article. If they say yes, then my next question: "Can my rights be infringed or abrogated by any administrative law, regulation, rule or procedure (in other words any thing the court uses in its crap game)?" If they say yes, its fraud again because of Miranda vs. Arizona "where RIGHTS are secured by the Constitution, there can be no legislative act, rule or regulation to abrogate them." If they say no then case dismissed, because it disqualifies their entire court and procedures. Article 1 courts, have no power over the People, they are simply tools created by CONGRESS, not the Constitution, for the business purposes of the United States and its citizens/persons. The People's courts are the Article 3 courts. I believe this is the true power over the courts, is disqualifying them even before they begin. opinions?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ps 1 freeman, the article 3 courts are the courts of the USA and the article 1 courts are the US. I am pretty certain, if they continue to pursue us after the disqualification, we can move the entire issue to the article 3, where that puts us on equal ground, outside their jurisdiction. article 3 is their bosses and the Miranda ruling suspends their powers when our rights are concerned. The Miranda ruling was article 3 and overrules anything they could do in article 1. I am thinking disqualifying the article 1 courts and all their procedures is really where we should be standing. It truly is the article 1 courts that are bankrupting us all!

      Delete
    2. How about this C?
      "The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to
      relief is entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and public
      offices in every State in the Union (2 Black 620, see also Crandell v.
      Nevada, 6 Wall 35).
      Plaintiff should not be charged fees, or costs for the lawful and
      constitutional right to petition this court in this matter in which he is
      entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally
      implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be
      applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief.
      Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43]"

      Delete
    3. The State's person has contractual protection between the State and the Federal/contract corporation. That is Art. 1, 8. Article:

      ARTICLES?

      1. A connected series of propositions; a system of rules. The subdivisions of a document, code, book, etc. A specification of distinct matters agreed upon or established by authority or requiring Judicial action. 2. A statute; as having its provisions articulately expressed under distinct heads. Several of the ancient English statutes were called “articles,” (articuli.) 3. A system of rules established by legal authority; as articles of war, articles of the navy, articles of faith, (see infra.) 4. A contractual document executed between parties, containing stipulations or terms of agreement; as articles of agreement, articles of partnership. 5. In chancery practice. A formal written statement of objections filed by a party, after depositions have been taken, showing ground for discrediting the witnesses.

      Father and mother are separated, and mother's product is used as a special deposit. Can this act be interpreted as a subdivision? Yes. I will provide proof of this by way of the beasts own legal definition which will bring with it, much clarity for those with the eyes to see it. I will post a little later today.

      Delete
    4. Think on this before the next post.

      What is MERGER?

      The fusion or absorption of one thing or right into another; generally spoken of a case where one of the subjects is of less dignity or importance than the other. Here the less important ceases to have an independent existence. In real-property law. It Is a general principle of law that where a greater estate and a less coincide and meet in one and the same person, without any intermediate estate, the less is immediately annihilated, or, in the law phrase, is said to be merged, that is, sunk or drowned, in the greater. Thus, if there be tenant for years, and the reversion in fee-simple descends to or is purchased by him, the term of years is merged in the Inheritance, and shall never exist any more. 2 Bl. Comm. 177; 1 Steph. Comm. 293; 4 Kent, Comm. 99. James v. Morey, 2 Cow. (N. Y.) 300, 14 Am. Dec. 475; Duncan v. Smith, 31 N. J. Law, 327. Of rights. This term, as applied to rights, is equivalent to “eonfusio” in the Roman law, and indicates that where the qualities of debtor and creditor become united in the same individual, there arises a confusion of rights which extinguishes both qualities; whence, also, merger is often called “extinguishment.” Brown. Rights of action. In the law relating to rights of action, when a person takes or acquires a remedy or security of a higher nature, in legal estimation, than the one which he already possesses for the same right, then his remedies in respect of the minor right or security merge in those attaching to the higher one. Leake, County. 500; 10 C. B. 501. As where a claim is merged in the judgment recovered upon it. In criminal law. When a man commits a great crime which includes a lesser, or commits a felony which includes a tort against a private person, the latter is merged in the former. 1 East, P. C. 411. Of corporations. A merger of corporations consist in the uniting of two or more corporations by the transfer of property of all to one of them, which continues in ex- istence, the others being swallowed up or merged therein. In regard to the survivorship of one of the constituent corporations, it differs from a “consolidation,” wherein all the consolidating companies surrender their separate existence and become parts of a new corporation. Adams v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., 77 Miss. 194, 24 South. 200, 00 L. R. A. 33; Vicksburg & Y. C. Tel. Co. v. Citizens’ Tel. Co., 79 Miss. 341, 30 South. 725, 89 Am. St. Rep. 056.

      Delete
    5. Here is a word that should give pause. Attribution.
      Try finding that definition now.

      Laying some ground work!
      Land. In the most general sense, comprehends any ground, soil, or earth whatsoever; including fields, meadows, pastures, woods, moors, waters, marshes, and rock. Reynard v. City of Caldwell, 55 Idaho 342, 42 P.2d 292, 296; Holmes v. U. S., C.C.A.Okl., 53 F.2d 960, 963. In its more limited sense, "land" denotes the quantity and character of the interest or estate which a person may own in land. Holmes v. U. S., C.C.A.Okl., 53 F.2d 960, 963. "Land" may include any estate or interest in lands, either legal or equitable, as well as easements and incorporeal hereditaments. Reynard v. City of Caldwell, 55 Idaho 342, 42 P.2d 292, 297; Jones v. Magruder, D.C.Md., 42 F.Supp. 193, 198; Lynch v. Cunningham, 131 Cal. App. 164, 21 P.2d 154; Petition of Burnquist, 220 Minn. 48, 19 N.W.2d 394, 401; Cuff v. Koslosky, 165 Okl. 135, 25 P.2d 290. The land is one thing, and the estate in land is another thing, for an estate in land is a time in land or land for a time.

      Character. The aggregate of the moral qualities which belong to and distinguish an individual person; the general result of the one's distinguishing attributes. That moral predisposition or habit, or aggregate of ethical qualities, which is believed to attach to a person, on the strength of the common opinion and report concerning him. A person's fixed disposition or tendency, as evidenced to others by his habits of life, through the manifestation of which his general reputation for the possession of a character, good or otherwise, is obtained. The estimate attached to an individual or thing in the community. The opinion generally entertained of a person derived from the common report of the people who are acquainted with him. Although "character" and "reputation" are often used synonymously, the terms are distinguishable. "Character" is what a man is, and "reputation" is what he is supposed to be in what people say he is. "Character" depends on attributes possessed, and "reputation" on attributes which others believe one to possess. The former signifies reality and the latter merely what is accepted to be reality at present.

      Attribution. Under certain circumstances, the tax law applies attribution rules to assign to one taxpayer the ownership interest of another taxpayer. If, for example, the stock of X Corporation is held 60% by M and 40% by s, M may be deemed to own 1 00% of X Corporation if M and S are mother and son. In such a case, the stock owned by S is attributed to M. Stated differently, M has a 60% "direct" and a 40% "indirect" interest in X Corporation. It can also be said that M is the "constructive" owner of S's interest.

      Delete
  14. How do we do our own indemnity bond for say travel privately.
    I remember you saying use two witnesses.
    So how to make out own bond ... steps?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cher-ie see my link to Kelli above for the silver bond. Now just adapt the affidavit language for a Proof of Financial Surety and record it and carry it with you wherever you travel.

      Delete
  15. And remember how to interpret the term "mere" while traveling in their fiction:

    Mere Imer I. L. Fr. Mother. .t£le, mere, fille, grandmother, mother, daughter. En ventre sa mere, in its mother's womb.

    Mere evidence rule. In search and seizure, it was once the rule that in a lawful search the officer had a right to seize instrumentalities and fruits of the crime but no right to seize other items (e.g. clothing of the suspect) which are mere evidence. This rule no longer prevails. Warden, Md. Penitentiary v. Hayden, 387 V.S. 294, 87 S.Ct. 1642, 18 L.Ed.2d 782.

    Mere licensee. One who enters upon the land or property of another without objection, or by the mere permission, sufferance, or acquiescence of the owner or occupier. Mann v. Des Moines Ry. Co., 232 Iowa 1049, 7 N.W.2d 45, 50. See Ucense.

    Merely. Without including anything else; purely; only; solely; absolute; wholly. In re Plymouth Motor Corporation, Cust. & Pat.App., 46 F.2d 211, 2 12.

    Mere motion. The free and voluntary act of a party himself, done without the suggestion or influence of another person, is said to be done of his mere motion, ex mero motu (q. v.). The phrase is used of an interference of the courts of law, who will, under some circumstances, of their own motion, object to an irregularity in the proceedings, though no objection has been taken to the informality by the plaintiff or defendant in the suit.

    Mere right. The mere right of property in land; the jus proprietatis, without either possession or even the right of possession. The abstract right of property.

    Mere-stone. In old English law, a stone for bounding or dividing lands.

    ReplyDelete
  16. cube sphere I love you posts. I really enjoy reading them. makes me think deeper.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  18. BB I am not the bond person, see 1freeman for that or check out his posts to kelli. about your POA, think about what authority you want to give your POA. You can hand write a POA and it doesn't have to be legal terminology, its very simply. Let's put it this way, if you wanted to give you wife/husband the right to use your signature in all business transactions, what would you want to give her. Write that down, then sign it in front of 2 witnesses with date and a notary. In other words, 2 witnesses need to go to the notary with you and sign it there. Don't over think this,just write it out with your own hand if you want, just giving yourself authority over all your accounts. It doesn't have to be long, even just a sentence or two. You just want to get it on the record. On the record is what is important. You want proof, you are the POA. It's not the context that is important.Its the rights transferred from whom to whom and witnessed and on the record. Context is neither here nor there. Personally since its the living soul, non legal one giving the rights of signatory to another, it would probably be better written in a non-legal form. Not everything we do has to be in legal terminology. Just if you understand what you are doing, then just put it on paper. sign it before the 2 witnesses and the notary and get it to the county public records. It is that simple. So what rights do you want to convey/transfer to your POA, so they can represent you in court? What rights do you want to convey/transfer to yourself?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ok, understood. Thank you very much C. Johnson.

      Do you possible know what is 21 silver bond equivalent to UK bond, is it £1 or £5, or shillings...
      Thanks.

      Delete
  19. ps BB my POA is pretty technical, because their is some stuff, I want to do without the POA and with the POA and it would confuse probably a lot of people on this forum. The thing is most people only need a very simple POA, maybe a few sentences. As they learn more and understand more, they may want to amend their POA and make it more technical. So, I won't share mine. I have shared the concept though that anyone can do for themselves. I prefer, people doing stuff for themselves by sharing procedures only. Because the more people learn to write their own stuff and work with their own writings, the more they will learn how to do this stuff for themselves. That is the key and that is what is important, for people to be able and willing to stand up and take control of their own paper issues. All of this is on paper and the faster someone, begins writing their own paper, the faster they will be free forever. Now, go write down what you want for your own life and situation and get it to the recorder.Just remember, this POA is you in court, so what powers and authority do you want the POA to have on your behalf. Have fun, be creative!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Very good C,

    Expanding our point of view together creates a brain trust for all who can glean its meaning. The people who created this system are brilliant, and brilliance is to see what most cannot. There is more here than an appearance of patriotism. When one reads the Summa Theologica, around page 7,700 property rights are addressed and keep this in mind, all seeds from the father giving the form to the land of mother, belong to the owner of the land-mother. If mother owns all that comes from her, and that maternal line is in fact the Christ-mass or shapeless mass/golem left at the hospital, would the custodian of the record have legal title to all that it produces through an unknown agency? I have proof from the County Registrar, all records are female like all ships. She also admitted that the State administrates for the church as in mind and body. There is much to be said here, however, she was removed after this meeting and had been there 10 years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. cube sphere I love this term: Prime MINISTER!!!! What are they they Prime MINISTER OF? Minister is defined:a member of the clergy. As you and I both know, nothing is by accident in this thing. It is not be accident the term minister was used!Such a mega matrix of terms, law, maxims, canons, etc...! Just mega spider web of crappola.

      Delete
  21. BB here's an example of a POA, maybe there's some stuff in it you can use when you write your own. https://formswift.com/durable-power-of-attorney

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BB here's info on a general POA. https://powerofattorney.com/general/

      Delete
    2. Awesome. That was very kind of you. Big Thanks.x

      Delete
    3. BB here's info you might enjoy: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/attorneyinfact.asp

      Delete
    4. BB, i sent you an email re: POA

      Enjoy😎

      Much Gratitude, Love and Peace

      Delete
  22. FYI FOR EVERYONE:
    UCC AND US TITLES, CODES, REGULATIONS AND RULES, PERTAIN ONLY TO U.S. CITIZEN PERSONS. This is where you get the practicing law without a license thing. These are the municipal and territorial administrative laws and procedures, Anna keeps referring to in her writings. These do not effect U.S. Nationals, it only includes U.S. Citizens who are municipal and territorial citizens. This is where all income tax laws and all other U.S. govt laws are found.
    USC TITLES ARE FOR U.S. NATIONALS. THESE TITLES includes the continental United States of America plus the people who are U.S. CITIZENS who live and work in dc and the territories. This the level of your expat from the U.S. and where your POA operates. These titles are where you find info about U.S. NATIONALS. These are the laws of the USA.
    CFR is International banking and finance laws and concerns everyone. This is where you find info about all the financial documents and instruments.
    Now, for the thinkers, if the USA govt, knows the difference and segments the laws to apply to different individuals, should we all do the same thing? U.S. Nationals are not governed by U.S. LAWS: U.C.C. AND U.S. By the same token, you won’t find any laws in the USC that restrict the rights of the People.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi C, Is there any way I can email you a few questions I have in relation to UCC and indemnity bond? My email address is laurajlv@yahoo.com. Thanks

      Delete
  23. C,
    It is an interesting term to be sure. mini-ster is also little star.

    minister (v.)
    "to serve, be of service, administer, attend, wait on," and directly from Latin ministrare "to serve, attend, wait upon," from minister … "inferior, servant, priest's assistant" (see minister (n.)). Related: Ministered; ministering.
    minister (n.)
    from Latin minister (genitive ministri) "inferior, servant, priest's assistant" (in Medieval Latin, "priest …
    prime minister
    1640s, see prime (adj.) and minister (n.). Applied to the First Minister of State of Great Britain since 1694. …
    ministry (n.)
    ministerium "office, service, attendance, ministry," from minister "inferior, servant, priest's assistant" (see minister (n.)). Began to be used 1916 as name of certain departments in British government.
    metier (n.)
    " from Gallo-Roman *misterium, from Latin ministerium "office, service," from minister "servant" (see minister (n.)).
    minestrone (n.)
    " literally "that which is served," from minestrare "to serve, to prepare (soup, etc.)," from Latin ministrare "to serve, attend, wait upon," from minister "inferior, servant, priest's assistant" (see minister (n.)).
    ministration (n.)
    ministratio), noun of action from past participle stem of ministrare "to serve, attend, wait upon," from minister "inferior, servant, priest's assistant" (see minister (n.)).
    *mei- (2)
    minimum; minister; ministration; ministry …
    administer (v.)
    attend, wait upon," from minister "inferior, servant, priest's assistant" (see minister (n.)). The -d …
    administration (n.)
    " from minister "inferior, servant, priest's assistant" (see minister (n.)). Early 15c. as "management of a deceased person's …

    ReplyDelete
  24. Optimus Prime!

    prime (v.)
    "to fill, charge, load" (a weapon), 1510s, probably from prime (adj.). Meaning "to cover with a first coat of paint or dye" is from c. 1600 … To prime a pump (c. 1840) meant to pour water down the tube, which saturated the sucking mechanism and made it draw up water more readily. Related: Primed; priming.
    prime (adj.)
    as in prime number) is from 1560s; prime meridian is from 1878. Prime time originally (c. 1500) meant "spring time;" broadcasting sense of "peak tuning-in period" is attested from 1961.
    prime (n.)
    "earliest canonical hour" (6 a.m.), Old English prim, from Medieval Latin prima "the first service," from Latin prima hora "the first hour" (of the Roman day). Meaning "most vigorous stage" first recorded 1530s; specifically "springtime of human life" (often meaning ages roughly 21 to 28) is from 1590s. In classical Latin, noun uses of the adjective meant "first part, beginning; leading place."
    prime minister
    1640s, see prime (adj.) and minister (n.). Applied to the First Minister of State of Great Britain since 1694. …
    primer (n.3)
    "first layer of dye or paint," 1680s, from prime (v.). …
    primer (n.2)
    "explosive cap," 1819, agent noun from prime (v.).
    primo
    1740, in music terms, from Italian primo "first, chief," from Latin primus (see prime (adj.)). As slang … for "excellent, first-class," perhaps an elaboration of prime. Of drugs, by 1990s, street slang.
    primus
    Latin for "first, the first" (see prime (adj.)).
    priming (n.)
    "first coat of paint," c. 1600, verbal noun from prime (v.). Meaning "gunpowder in the pan of a firearm" is from 1590s.
    subprime (adj.)
    also sub-prime, of loans, etc., by 1978, in frequent use from 1996, from sub- + prime (adj.).
    1

    ReplyDelete
  25. First copy is an original article, not the genuine.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Here is what the pope said in 1302. Hu-man is color of man, not man and also referred to as a monster/golem. This should elucidate the issue/decedent for those in the dark.
    Urged by faith, we are obliged to believe and to maintain that the Church is one, holy, catholic, and also apostolic. We believe in her firmly and we confess with simplicity that outside of her there is neither salvation nor the remission of sins, as the Spouse in the Canticles [Sgs 6:8] proclaims: "One is my dove, my perfect one. She is the only one, the chosen of her who bore her," and she represents one sole mystical body whose Head is Christ and the head of Christ is God [1 Cor 11:3]. In her then is one Lord, one faith, one baptism [Eph 4:5]. There had been at the time of the deluge only one ark of Noah, prefiguring the one Church, which ark, having been finished to a single cubit, had only one pilot and guide, i.e., Noah, and we read that, outside of this ark, all that subsisted on the earth was destroyed.

    ReplyDelete
  27. We venerate this Church as one, the Lord having said by the mouth of the prophet: "Deliver, O God, my soul from the sword and my only one from the hand of the dog." [Ps 21:20] He has prayed for his soul, that is for himself, heart and body; and this body, that is to say, the Church, He has called one because of the unity of the Spouse, of the faith, of the sacraments, and of the charity of the Church. This is the tunic of the Lord, the seamless tunic, which was not rent but which was cast by lot [Jn 19:23- 24]. Therefore, of the one and only Church there is one body and one head, not two heads like a monster; that is, Christ and the Vicar of Christ, Peter and the successor of Peter, since the Lord speaking to Peter Himself said: "Feed my sheep" [Jn 21:17], meaning, my sheep in general, not these, nor those in particular, whence we understand that He entrusted all to him [Peter]. Therefore, if the Greeks or others should say that they are not confided to Peter and to his successors, they must confess not being the sheep of Christ, since Our Lord says in John "there is one sheepfold and one shepherd." We are informed by the texts of the gospels that in this Church and in its power are two swords; namely, the spiritual and the temporal. For when the Apostles say: "Behold, here are two swords" [Lk 22:38] that is to say, in the Church, since the Apostles were speaking, the Lord did not reply that there were too many, but sufficient. Certainly the one who denies that the temporal sword is in the power of Peter ha s not listened well to the word of the Lord commanding: "Put up thy sword into thy scabbard" [Mt 26:52]. Both, therefore, are in the power of the Church, that is to say, the spiritual and the material sword, but the former is to be administered for the Church but the latter by the Church; the former in the hands of the priest; the latter by the hands of kings and soldiers, but at the will and sufferance of the priest.

    However, one sword ought to be subordinated to the other and temporal authority, subjected to spiritual power. For since the Apostle said: "There is no power except from God and the things that are, are ordained of God" [Rom 13:1-2], but they would not be ordained if one sword were not subordinated to the other and if the inferior one, as it were, were not led upwards by the other.

    ReplyDelete
  28. For, according to the Blessed Dionysius, it is a law of the divinity that the lowest things reach the highest place by intermediaries. Then, according to the order of the universe, all things are not led back to order equally and immediately, but the lowest by the intermediary, and the inferior by the superior. Hence we must recognize the more clearly that spiritual power surpasses in dignity and in nobility any temporal power whatever, as spiritual things surpass the temporal. This we see very clearly also by the payment, benediction, and consecration of the tithes, but the acceptance of power itself and by the government even of things. For with truth as our witness, it belongs to spiritual power to establish the terrestrial power and to pass judgement if it has not been good. Thus is accomplished the prophecy of Jeremias concerning the Church and the ecclesiastical power: "Behold today I have placed you over nations, and over kingdoms" and the rest. Therefore, if the terrestrial power err, it will be judged by the spiritual power; but if a minor spiritual power err, it will be judged by a superior spiritual power; but if the highest power of all err, it can be judged only by God, and not by man, according to the testimony of the Apostle: "The spiritual man judgeth of all things and he himself is judged by no man" [1 Cor 2:15]. This authority, however, (though it has been given to man and is exercised by man), is not human but rather divine, granted to Peter by a divine word and reaffirmed to him (Peter) and his successors by the One Whom Peter confessed, the Lord saying to Peter himself, "Whatsoever you shall bind on earth, shall be bound also in Heaven" etc., [Mt 16:19]. Therefore whoever resists this power thus ordained by God, resists the ordinance of God [Rom 13:2], unless he invent like Manicheus two beginnings, which is false and judged by us heretical, since according to the testimony of Moses, it is not in the beginnings but in the beginning that God created heaven and earth [Gen 1:1]. Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.

    ReplyDelete
  29. For those who have a difficult time seeing the relation-ship from what was posted here and the subject matter which is indemnity bonds.

    If you will read all the above posts carefully, a State is the (head) or administrative branch of the church or body of the maternal line which is spelled out in their own writing which is provided for those who can see it. POA is an administrative function of the church, though the State gives the form to fit its agenda. POA is execution of the will of trustees authorized by the State if you can see it. The State holds the record of live birth=subject and evidences the matter/special deposit. We can act as a private attorney in fact as heir and beneficiary of the estate the State created. Simply put, who gives the power to operate in a particular capacity? A notary is certified by the State, an affirmation is witnessed by 2 or more people. One is legal and the other lawful. Over and over in the vital stats act, the only authority recognized is the trustees of the administrative body or the beneficiary and heir, ask why that is, then re-read from the pope, man is subject to God and no other man, but the hu-man creature is absolutely subject to the Ro-man Pontiff! Rho=breath and man =man. Without knowing all the relation-ships, people get into trouble. If a man loses his head, do trustees demand a body attachment? Do you see it? Oh capitol.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Thank you kindly to All who are contributing to this timely and vital discussion Now! So many connections are being made Now between what spirit within has been revealing, teaching me as the rock we stand on firmly, wholly IN spirit and in the flesh!!!

    Time to Come home INdeed!!!

    Much Gratitude, Love and Peace Be Now

    ReplyDelete
  31. Can anyone explain if this indemnity bond can be used to save properties from foreclosure?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Yes, the silver bond can be used for forclosure and just about any court case on the simple basis that you are bonding your claim and they are not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1FreeMan,
      Is there any way you can guide me thru this process? I have a few questions and am willing to pay for your help. Can you please email me: laurajlv@yahoo.com?
      Thanks.

      Delete
  33. ladyj88 can't help you with the bond info. I no nothing about it.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE "Anonymous".or "unknown" YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.