Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Wednesday, July 4, 2018

Tragic "Misunderstandings" -- Number One


By Anna Von Reitz

The first misconception we are heir to is the idea that the federal Constitutions were ever created to rule over us.  In fact, the Constitutions (multiple) were established to rule over our Federal employees, and to create, define, and control subcontracting organizations that provide “essential government services” under a delegation of powers agreement. 
Big Time Message here --- the Law “of” the Land is not the Law “for” the Land. 
The Constitutions are often referred to the “Law of the Land” because the Federales all function exclusively in the jurisdiction of the sea. 
They are obligated to obey the “Law of the Land” when they come “ashore” and enter our jurisdictions.
When dealing with the Federal Government --- any branch of the Federal Government at all – you have to remember that they are looking at the world from their perspective.  Not yours. 
They are, jurisdictionally speaking, out at sea, talking about the Constitutions that your ancestors imposed on them and their operations as “land law”.  
From their perspective, the Constitutions and other Organic and Public Laws of this country are foreign.
The Federal Code is the law of the Federal Civil Service, and the Code of Military Justice functions as the law governing the Military. 
Though this will come as a big surprise to many people, none of the Constitutions --- Federal, Territorial or Municipal – are concerned with us at all.  That is why the Bill of Rights was added as an after-thought instead of being the centerpiece of the constitutional process.
The only time that the Constitutions become important to us is when our Federal Employees over-step their boundaries and transgress upon us.
The word “transgression” – as Cookie, my Paralegal, pointed out -- is a legally precise description of the situation we find ourselves in, because it refers to the process by which the sea (jurisdiction) spreads over land (jurisdiction) just as well as any actual physical creep of the oceans inland.
“Trespass” is what happens on the land jurisdiction when people go where they don’t belong and “Transgression” is what happens in the international jurisdiction of the sea when persons do the same.
They have surely transgressed against us—a situation that must be addressed without further obfuscation, misunderstanding or excuse.
Our employees have contrived to ignore their duties and the restrictions of the Constitutions, and to attack us and deprive us, their employers, of our property and guarantees.    
How has this been done? 
It’s simple.  They have arbitrarily defined us as one them:  a “US Citizen” --- part of their political system, a Democrat or a Republican, a Federal Employee or Dependent of some kind, a political asylum seeker, or a federally chartered corporation-- none of these “persons” have any constitutional rights or guarantees at all, and never have had.
So long as we do not object, strenuously and knowledgeably, they get away with it--- and they have gotten away with it for such a long time that they have grown arrogant and secure in their ability to pillage and oppress us via legal chicanery. They have made sure that most Americans would never have any cause to know what they have been doing to us behind our backs.
As a result of the negotiated peace process ending in the Treaty of Paris (1783) the British Monarch was allowed to retain de facto supervision of nineteen enumerated powers that actually and naturally should be ours to exercise. 
The Founders devised a system by which the King had to act through business organizations belonging to the States called “States of States” in order to exercise his delegated powers. 
Nobody at the time could imagine that Georgia would lose control of The State of Georgia and that this original American “State of State” would be secretively supplanted and replaced by a Territorial United States corporation merely calling itself “the” State of Georgia--- but this Cuckoo Bird change actually  took place in the wake of the so-called Civil War.
The Federal States of State were usurped and almost nobody was the wiser, but from then on, the King enjoyed a much freer hand and his minions began to chisel away, like moths in a closet.
While it is customary for employers to be respected as such, it is also customary for American workers to be respected as people equal under the law. 
The voluntary servitude involved in working a job is not taken – by Americans – as any stigma or suggestion that workers are lower class or deprived of any of their natural rights as a condition of their employment – and yet, ironically, we have allowed exactly such a demeaning and feudalistic system of inequality under the law to develop and flourish in America.
This feudal class system has no part in our thinking or tradition, but it is common and pernicious in Britain, and as a result, it followed over here with respect to the King’s puppets running the Territorial States of States and the usurped “Federal” Government, which should have been more properly called a British “Territorial” Government.
Our own Federal Government designed to be operated by our States was --- according to the British Perpetrators--- in a “condition of abeyance”. 
We might claim and enforce our rights and powers---if we see through the deceit and have sense enough to claim them, but the King never gave his employees any such rights or abilities, with the result that Federal workers and members of our military have, since the 1860’s, been treated as second-class citizens and as chattel belonging to the British Crown.
Federal Employees and Dependents have struggled along as best they could. Those born white and on the soil of one of the States claimed Dual Citizenship to allow themselves to retain their constitutional guarantees---at least while off-duty.  Those born black weren’t so lucky or able to adapt, so they finally rebelled and rioted for “Equal Civil Rights”--- meaning rights equal to the “natural and unalienable rights” other Americans are supposed to enjoy.
Slowly, by means of guile and deceit, the King’s minions on our shores --- especially members of the BAR Associations – have contrived to redefine all of us as federal Territorial Citizens, as if we were all born in Puerto Rico.  This scam allows them to seize upon our Good Names and property assets and to subject us to their foreign corporate Codes.
They have done this to control Americans and hold us in a state of subjection---the same subjection that our ancestors rebelled against.  They have done this to escape the limitations imposed on them by the Constitutions, to inflict the evils of their own British system on others and, in the case of the lawyers, bankers, and politicians responsible, to share in the profits of doing so.
Via this institutionalized fraud scheme they have contrived to provide Britain with a means to conscript American manpower into its wars and American natural resources into its commodity rigging schemes.
All of this is very profitable for the King and his helpers, very unfortunate for the actual Americans and the rest of the world--- and a gross, blatant Breach of Trust and of international treaties and of international commercial law.  
What they could never win by force of arms they have contrived to seize by fraud and deceit.
Our government--- our actual, sovereign government – has declared the end of any so-called “abeyance” and has served Notice on the guilty Principals involved in this shameful circumstance.  The actual States have been called to assemble, and all fifty of them are now engaged. 
This Fourth of July, make it count for something more than a distant memory. 
If you want your government restored and an end to the European guile and criminality that has held us in thrall for 150 years, get sharp and get busy. Correct your own falsified political status records. Join your State Assemblies which are gathering – go to https://national-assembly.net or send an email with your County and State in the subject line to contentmanager1@yahoo.com
Once you are on solid ground, start filing criminal reports and administrative complaints against the banks and the politicians and bureaucrats and court officials who have impersonated you and knowingly committed barratry and unlawful conversion against you.  You know who they are and where they live, their names, their families, their faces.  Report the criminals.  It’s your duty.  So do it.  And again.
Make the ears of the politicians and regulators and bankers and police and attorneys and priests and doctors and other Grand Poobahs bleed.  Light the watch fires and give them a taste.
The filthy home foreclosures.  The fake custody claims.  The unlawful licenses and racketeering and extortion.  The undisclosed “implied” contracts.  The “thought crimes”.  The asset seizures.  The police brutality.  The false census records.  The faked elections.  The vile registration processes.  The taxes you never owed. The purloined National Credit. The Federal Reserve.  The draft.  The drugs. The human trafficking. The schools.  The Fluoride.  The Smartmeters.  The Microwave “Kill” Towers.  The NSA snooping.  The mischaracterization and impersonation of innocent Americans.  The wholesale murder of babies.  The slush funds.  The chem trails.  The out of control S.W.A.T. units.  The banks talking about seizing our credit and assets on deposit for their debts.  The lousy rats sending our sons and daughters to war and impoverishing us for their profits.  The bums locking up our resources and curtailing our industries. The vermin planning to cheat seniors out of the pitiful “Social Security” pensions the Queen doles out like gruel during a drought and which her minions try to mischaracterize as “welfare benefits” when the victims have paid for everything and far more all by themselves.   The bogus Cestui Que Vie “trust estates”.  The even more bogus Public Transmitting Utilities. The patented criminal processes.  The infringement of our copyrights.  The identity theft on a national scale. The foreign bill collection agencies pretending to be our courts.  The court administrators pretending to be judges.  The vermin proposing to lord it over us without a public oath, without a public bond, and without a valid commission.  The private corporate mercenaries masquerading as “STATE OF STATE” police and operating under color of law, attacking our people and evicting them from their homes based on debts the people never owed.  The list goes on.  And on.  And on. 
This year, beginning July 4, make it your goal to take action every single day. 
File a criminal complaint.  File an administrative complaint. Write a Letter a Day exposing the rot.   Confront these people with what they are doing. Address the doctors and the hospital administrators and bankers.  Visit the local police and the Registrars and the Court Clerks.  Look them in the eye.
Give them no excuse.   
Take positive actions, too, to teach your neighbors and friends and family and anyone who will face the facts and listen.  Organize, assemble, and serve your local county assembly and State Assembly.  Contribute as you can, where you are, and with what you have at hand.
This year, be heard, not herd.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

41 comments:

  1. Here we are two hundred years later being explained things which should be readily set forth within the original body of law - if it does not so convey the complex structures behind things, within its own design as it is setting forth laws, it is nearly useless to the masses. Nice original documents, a bit poorly loftily presented. Even the name "constitution" is a thing, a troubling, non sensible thing bouncing without meaning on the tongue for most people. Law of the Land rings clearer and truer. Which works best to teach the meaning to children? We need a translator machine so the children can make sense of it all. It can walk and talk like Anna, but only for the very initiated. Next, a translator for the translator for the translator... until it reads sensible again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How many times have I stated on this forum that the "Constitution"(any comstitution) is simply to complex for people to understand..Hell, most people can't even tell you what the first 10 amendments are..."THE BILL OF RIGHTS"..!! It's time for a new eror!! Let's call it what it really is

      "The constitution only for govt employees, that they solemnly swear that the people reign supreme over all govt agencies and that the least suit brought against them will result in a summery judgement for "the people" and that there will be no REMEDY for govt authority if even one person brings a claim against it..!! We have to make it so difficult for them to do their job no one will be interested in working for govt. again...!! The "chains" of "liability" So tight that they can't move without committing a crime and jail time...!!

      Delete
  2. The bogus Cestui Que Vie “trust estates”. Cestui que trust = beneficiary...cestui que vie = the entire life span of the fiction. They exist in the Barron's Canadian Law dictionary. Some say they pay your hydro bill and the power company send you a statement ( not a bill ) and they get paid again. Why are you saying they are bogus? Winston Shrout even said to complain to the IRS re the ceo of the power company double dipping. Long time since I watched the video so not verbatim. I would prefer to control the fiction aka trust as the beneficiary rather than slay it. How sure are you Anna that they are bogus?

    ReplyDelete
  3. So in essence then "The Rule of Law" is also a "mischaracterization " of "The Rule for Law"...!! But as I see it, at the very core of the problem is the "insurance comp." who are "adiding and abetting " all the cities and counties to get away with "FRAUD", because they couldn't survive without their blessings...!! On KFI am radio yesterday, they said the city of L.A. coughed up $250 million in legal fees for lawsuits filed against them...!! Criminals cannot survive unless someone is acting as surety for their criminal behavior..!! We need to struck them where it hurts the most...sue the insurers of this fraud and put them out of business for good...!! Once the principle is noticed, all the agents are also noticed and everyone then is "liable" for fraud in the first degree......the death penality...!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. And that should accomplish the same thing as "agenda 21" except that instead of the people being reduced by half , the entire planet will be free of govt employees which will accomplish the goal of getting rid of half the population of earth or more...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I like your idea,do you have a plan of action?
      R is that something that needs worked out

      Delete
    2. I believe you are right James Pansini. I do have trouble understanding Judge Anna's way of doing things, like filing different paper work with the Criminal Government that usurped the real De Jure Government, if that is the case, then why can't the real De Jure Government of the people just charge THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC. for the overthrow of the real united States of America, which was TREASON am I on the right track. cheers Noel

      Delete
    3. Or maybe start putting the word out that if you are working for the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT INC. You are going to be charged with TREASON and EXECUTED.

      Delete
    4. Yes, Noel, your on the right track and it should be that easy...!! If we win this war, then "WE, THE PEOPLE" cannot ever allow one agency to be in charge of our currency, like our Treasury ...!! Those records have to be reported to the people every month to see where all the money is going...no more "Black Budgets" for the military or anyone else...!! Money is simply to important to let any one person or agency in charge of it...!! If anyone asked us for thousands of dollars, wouldn't we want to know WHY..!! But we give it to our govt. as if they were all angles that would never cheat or steal from us....!! NO MORE..!!!

      Delete
    5. Exactly, Noel and James. And in particular, YES to you Noel. You're on the right track. Why file endless paperwork telling the pirates who and what you are when all these govt services scum are being told now to just stonewall "constitutionalists". It's pathetic, ridiculous, and yes, constitutes high treason because they are aiding and abetting (giving aid and comfort) to the enemy, i.e. the British Crown Corporation thugs. So, I agree, just put them all (any whom you can in your encounters) on Notices of Liability that claim a high monetary penalty along with a charge of treason for good measure. It's time to close them down for good. I just sent one out to a former Court Clerk who colluded in wrongful prosecution against me for $279,000 -- the prosecutor refused her notice but it's still in its certified mail envelope. Let them feel the heat of hell on their heels, I say!

      Delete
  5. It would be important to understand the situation of Puerto Rico. Anna keeps saying that Americans are considered as if they were born there. But what is the situation in PR? PR was invaded by the vermin in 1898, after a transfer from Spain to the US. How can the vermin have any jurisdiction in PR, if they also transgressed into lands that are not there just like they did in the US after they usurped the United States? This book explains the history of PR and is a well researched book by a Harvard lawyer after 40 years of study on the history of the island. There has been a great injustice done in PR as well, and they do not have any rights to the island. https://waragainstallpuertoricans.com/the-book/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That last hurricane laid waste to that island, and it hasn't returned to normal to this day..!! I guess all the records went along with it..!!

      Delete
  6. I assume the same situation applies to Guam and Mariana Islands as Puerto Rico? What is the situation there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Im sure you will find PR did the same as the mariana islands and sold their people out. I forgot the public law that explains in detail how they did it, google mariana islands public law and the details are there. it also details how to renounce their forced nationality/citizenship to not be a 14th amendment/US citizen and declare their new nationality/citizenship to be part of the private people. I think you can also google department of state for non citizen nationals if you read carefully its hidden in plain sight there.

      Delete
    2. In PR just as everywhere else, they inserted their lawyers to infiltrate the island. Nobody agreed to be sold nor it was explained to them what they were doing. PR had obtained its independence from Spain in 1898 just before they were invaded by the US Army/Navy. There is a lack of knowledge on the history of PR and it is not OK to use it as a derogatory term. We have all been abused in this story. PR have been battling this since these people invaded and they want their island back, but with the guns over their heads since 1898, few battles have been won. At least they got the navy out of there in 2001, after they left countless people with cancer and other illnesses due to their chemical exercises. A better understanding of the history of PR is needed in this discussion. Again more info https://waragainstallpuertoricans.com/the-book/

      Delete
  7. Law of the land exert from the supremacy clause of the constitution . What the big state people hang thair hat on to make the federalies.gods.
    this sheds light on it law with respect to Fed's only.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not law for the land the nation states non feds .

      Delete
  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw6sKtXDCZk

    ReplyDelete
  9. Does a published definition exist for "state of state"?
    -

    ReplyDelete
  10. chef, first thing to know is this, for a state to be a true state it must have geographical land boundaries. There are other entities that call themselves STATES that have no geographical land boundaries because they are jurisdiction boundaries only. Thus South Carolina is a true state (de jure) because it has geographical boundaries on the land. The State of South Carolina, is (de facto), because it is on the land belonging to South Carolina, but does not own the land. It only has jurisdiction on the land that belongs to South Carolina. If you can get that image, than you will understand a state of a state. It belongs to a state that has geographical land boundaries. in this court case the Supreme Court described issues between the True State Kentucky and the de facto united states jurisdiction. Commissioners of Sinking Fund v. Howard. To understand state you must understand territory and also jurisdiction. The one that holds the land is sovereign, unless he has ceded jurisdiction to the land to another.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As well as a "union." It is all fictional, imaginary. All the paperwork needs to have is an address where it was incorporated and it exists in fairyland.

      Delete
    2. its all make believe, that's right penny4yerthoughts. it truly is a matrix of fabrication. The more I learn, the more I want to get some cheese to go with the baloney.

      Delete
  11. Ps. Example, its like a POA. the one who gives the POA to another, is the true power and authority. But, the POA has rights over the delegated power ceded from the true power and authority. The POA is the state of state for the one who gave the power. Of means: belonging to, of signifies a possession belonging to something, someone. Like: The house of the Smiths.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Please see cafr1.com for a glimpse of the wealth of the corporations that are ruling US. The towns, cities, counties, states, and federal corporations have more money than most anyone thinks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent post^ & Walter has responded as well yesterday!

      http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/07/blockbuster-find-from-walter-burien.html?m=1

      Delete
    2. Mike Rothe, here's the scam: the B/C made them the trustees of all that wealth. It is being held in trust for all AMERICAN STATE NATIONALS. They claimed our wealth under finders/keepers (AS IF IT WAS LOST). They are keeping it in safe keeping for the rightful owners to show up,that's the people who owe allegiance to a several state. But, those people prefer to remain U.S. CITIZENS/SUBJECTS to the U.S.

      Delete
    3. Here is some food for thought; State of state produces a ledger/ROLB or a line of credit to the user/man of no record. (bait on a hook) The custodian holds the record for the heir which is claimed unknown and the sole reason for administration. Can an administration naturalize the ROLB/person without any action from the user/heir binding them/joinder as a matter of law? (subject/matter and matter is mother) No, so what is the nexus that allows for the presumption? Ready? It is any election made which they bring into a court action. A W-4 is a withholding agent for the contract government if you are employed by the fed, but wait.... USC 26, 6013g states, one not employed by the fed can be-TREATED- as they are for the purposes of taxes! There is always two sides when dealing with magic. Do we find ourselves where we are, now here or nowhere?

      ledger (n.)
      " is first attested 1580s, short for ledger-book (1550s). Ledger (adj.) "remaining in a place, permanent, stationary" is attested from 1540s; compare … ledger-bait "fishing bait made to stay in one place" (1650s). The surname, however, is via the Normans, from St. Leger, a 7c …
      ledge (n.)
      ledger). Others suggest a Scandinavian source cognate with Swedish lagg "the rim of a cask." Sense of "narrow shelf" is first recorded 1550s; that of "shelf-like projection of rock" is from 1550s.
      *legh-
      " ledge; ledger; lees; lie (v.2) "rest horizontally …
      Advertisement

      Delete
    4. We were ALL born as State Nationals. It was hours later or days later that we were all KIDNAPPED and claimed to be u.s. citizens. The kidnapping happened Secondarily !

      Now, in real life, literally, if we got kidnapped and somehow found or returned to our original Home, we did NOT need to undo any kidnapping. It happened automatically upon our physical return BY the kidnappers or FROM the kidnappers.

      So whats with all this ''you gotta jump thru hoops to be Returned from our kidnapping'?

      The point being overlooked here is..........What we all started out BEING: A natural born National. Our kidnapping was all FRAUD. Since when do WE have to correct FRAUD.

      Delete
    5. Any national is still a creation of the state/State and no one can tell you what you are, it's absurd and never happened. Nationality is what the person is that the state/State gave us to use and it has Constitutional protections in its use. Most people do not know the difference and became a business plan to the point where all things are criminal now. Thats why I posted all this so people can see through the smoke and mirrors.

      Delete
  13. Captain America,

    "Project Rebirth"

    birth (v.)
    mid-13c., "be born," from birth (n.). Meaning "give birth to, give rise to" is from 1906. Related: Birthed; birthing.
    birth (n.)
    c. 1200, "fact of being born;" mid-13c., "act of giving birth, a bringing forth by the mother, childbirth," sometimes in Middle English also "conception;" also "that which is born, offspring … child;" from a Scandinavian source such as Old Norse *byrðr (replacing cognate Old English gebyrd "birth, descent, race; offspring; nature; fate … 1200 (also in the Old English word). In reference to non-living things, "any coming into existence" is from 1610s. Birth control is from 1914; birth certificate is from 1842.

    birth-rate (n.)
    1859, from birth (n.) + rate (n.). …
    birth-mark (n.)
    also birthmark, "congenital mark or blemish," by 1805, from birth (n.) + mark (n.1). Birth marks …
    birthing (n.)
    "action or process of giving birth," 1901, verbal noun from birth (v.).
    birthstone (n.)
    1874, from birth (n.) + stone (n.).
    rebirth (n.)
    1812, "reincarnation;" 1833, "renewed life or activity," from re- + birth (n.).
    birthright (n.)
    also birth-right, 1530s, from birth (n.) + right (n.). Used as an adjective from 1650s, especially by Quakers.
    stillbirth (n.)
    also still-birth, 1764, from still (adj.) + birth (n.).
    birthplace (n.)
    also birth-place, "town, country, etc.,e where one was born," c. 1600, from birth (n.) + place (n.). Middle English had birthstede (c. 1400).

    ReplyDelete
  14. Borne Identity

    Lost at sea!

    born (adj.)
    with bear is no longer felt; the phrase to be born has become virtually an intr. verb" [OED]. Distinction between … born and borne (q.v.) is 17c. From early 14c. as "possessing from birth the character or quality described" (born poet … born loser, etc.). From 1710 as "innate, inherited;" colloquial expression in (one's) born days "in (one's) lifetime" is by 1742.
    natural-born (adj.)
    1580s, from natural (adj.) + born.
    first-born (adj., n.)
    mid-14c., from first (adj.) + born.
    well-born (adj.)
    Old English welboren; see well (adv.) + born.
    high-born (adj.)
    also highborn, "of noble birth," c. 1300, from high (adv.) + born.
    free-born (adj.)
    "inheriting liberty," mid-14c., from free (adj.) + born. Old English had freolic (adj.) "free … free-born; glorious, magnificent, noble; beautiful, charming," which became Middle English freli, "a stock epithet of compliment," but which died out, perhaps as the form merged with that of freely (adv.).
    reborn (adj.)
    1590s, from re- "back, again" + born.
    borne
    "carried, sustained, endured," past tense and participle of bear (v.) in all senses not related to birth. See born.
    newborn (adj.)
    also new-born, c. 1300, from new + born. As a noun from 1879.
    aborning (adv.)
    "while being born," 1893, American English; see a- (1) + born + -ing (2).
    1

    ReplyDelete
  15. Are we putting all the pieces together now!!

    "Do ewe understand"

    sheep (n.)
    faar for "sheep") or Gothic (which uses lamb), and with no known cognates outside Germanic. The more usual Indo-European word for the animal is represented in English by … clothing was in Old English (from Matthew vii.15); that of separating the sheep from the goats is from Matthew xxv.33. To count sheep in a bid … from 1849 ["Sidney's Emigrant's Journal"] describes the night-shepherd ("hut-keeper") taking a count of the sheep regularly at the end of his shift to protect against being answerable for any animals …
    sheep-dog (n.)
    1774, from sheep (n.) + dog (n.).
    sheep-shank (n.)
    also sheepshank, 1670s, "leg of a sheep," from sheep + shank (n.). A type of something lank …
    sheepskin (n.)
    c. 1200, "the skin of a sheep," from sheep + skin (n.). Meaning "diploma" dates from 1804; so called because formerly made of sheepskin parchment.
    sheepish (adj.)
    c. 1200, "resembling a sheep" in some perceived characteristic, from sheep + -ish. The sense of "bashful, over-modest, awkward … among strangers" first is recorded 1690s. Related: Sheepishly; sheepishness. Old English had sceaplic "of a sheep, 'sheep-ly.'" …
    black sheep (n.)
    by 1822 in figurative sense of "member of some group guilty of offensive conduct and unlike the other members," supposedly because a real black sheep had wool that could not be dyed and thus was … worth less. But one black sheep in a flock was considered good luck by shepherds in Sussex, Somerset, Kent, Derbyshire. First known publication of Baa Baa Black Sheep nursery rhyme is in "Tommy Thumb's Pretty Song Book" (c. 1744).
    shepherd (n.)
    Old English sceaphierde, from sceap "sheep" (see sheep) + hierde "herder …
    ovine (adj.)
    "pertaining to or of the nature of sheep," 1828, from Latin ovinus, from ovis "sheep," from PIE Related: *owi- "sheep" (see ewe).
    ewe (n.)
    Old English eowu "female sheep," fem. of eow "sheep," from Proto-Germanic *awi, genitive … ooi, Old High German ouwi "sheep," Gothic aweþi "flock of sheep"), from PIE *owi- "sheep" (source also … of Sanskrit avih, Greek ois, Latin ovis, Lithuanian avis "sheep," Old Church Slavonic …
    Faroese (n.)
    also Faeroese, 1816, from the Faroe islands, at the ends of the North Sea, literally "sheep-islands," from Faroese … Føroyar, from før "sheep" + oy (plural oyar) "island.” …


    ReplyDelete
  16. child (n.)
    " Old English cildhama "womb," lit. "child-home"); no certain cognates outside Germanic. "App[arently] originally always used in relation to the mother as the 'fruit … of the womb'" [Buck]. Also in late Old English, "a youth of gentle birth" (archaic, usually written childe). In 16c.-17c. especially "girl child."
    The wider sense "young … person before the onset of puberty" developed in late Old English. Phrase with child "pregnant" (late 12c.) retains the original sense. The sense extension from "infant …
    child-proof (adj.)
    1933, from child (n.) + proof (n.). As a verb by 1951.
    brain-child (n.)
    "idea, creation of one's own mind," 1850, from brain (n.) + child. Earlier was the alliterative brain-brat (1630).
    love-child (n.)
    "child born out of wedlock, child of illicit love," 1805, from love (n.) + child. Earlier was love brat (17c.). …
    child-bearing (n.)
    also childbearing, "bringing forth of a child, the action of producing children," late 14c., from child + verbal noun of bear (v.). As an adjective from late 14c.

    children (n.)
    modern plural of child (q.v.)

    childe (n.)
    "youth of gentle birth," used as a kind of title, late Old English, variant spelling of child (q.v.).
    childless (adj.)
    "having no children or offspring," c. 1200, from child (n.) + -less. Related: Childlessness.

    grandchild (n.)
    1580s, graundchilde, from grand- + child. Related: Grandchildren.
    manchild (n.)
    also man-child, "male child, male infant," c. 1400, from man (n.) + child.
    1

    ReplyDelete
  17. infant (n.)
    late 14c., infant, infaunt, "a child," also especially "child during earliest period of life, a newborn" (sometimes meaning a fetus …
    infantile (adj.)
    mid-15c., "pertaining to infants," from Late Latin infantilis "pertaining to an infant," from infans "young child" (see infant). Sense of "infant-like" is from 1772.
    Infanta (n.)
    "daughter of a king of Spain or Portugal," c. 1600, from Spanish and Portuguese infanta, fem. of infante "a youth; a prince of royal blood," from Latin infantem (see infant). …
    enfant terrible (n.)
    1851, French, literally "terrible child" (see infant + terrible). One whose unorthodox or shocking speech or manners embarrass …
    Fauntleroy
    French Le Enfant le Roy), from faunt, a Middle English variant of enfaunt (see infant). Middle English also had fauntekin "a little child" (late 14c.).
    infanticide (n.)
    1650s, "the killing of infants," especially the killing of newborns or the unborn; 1670s, "one who kills an infant," from infant …
    infantry (n.)
    infantem (see infant). Meaning "infants collectively" is recorded from 1610s. A Middle English (c. 1200) word for "foot-soldiers" was going-folc, literally "going-folk." …
    infancy (n.)
    " from infantem "young child," literally "one unable to speak" (see infant). Restriction to the earliest months of life is a return …
    *bha- (2)
    infamy; infant; infantile; infantry …
    SIDS (n.)
    1970, acronym for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.
    1

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Internal Revenue Manual (I.R.M.) 21.7.13.3.2.2, “An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN.”

      Delete
    2. Do you still believe that anything issued from the State of the forum is yours?

      Delete
  18. Fruit of the loom, fruit from the poisonous tree of life, now you know.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Speak for yourself,
    You might want to read the above again and look up every word.
    Man and baby are not used in any code for good reason. That re-mark makes reason stare!

    ReplyDelete
  20. There are no Constitutional Rights, only Constitutional Wrongs. Constitute mean commission; when they violate their commission they commit a Constitutional Wrong and we must address it.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.
DO NOT COMMENT USING THE HANDLE "Anonymous".or "unknown" YOUR COMMENT WILL BE DELETED IMMEDIATELY.