Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Thursday, June 14, 2018

Baby Slave Trade


By Anna Von Reitz

[Somehow there was a translation cut and copy error in the first release of this article so that some sections were repeated in Mac applications. This should now appear with no repeats.]

Baby Slave Trade

One of the chief obnoxious behaviors of our British Territorial United States "service providers" is to convert our names into their labels. They do this to their own people and they have been sneaking around doing it to us, too.

A friend just sent me a Prize Snippet from Frank O'Collin's work, his Canon of Positive Law, concerning the history and gross misuse of Birth Certificates.

After you've read these few paragraphs exposing how Birth Certificates came into being, stand back and take a deep breath and realize that this is all 100% anti-scriptural Satanic nonsense which the British Monarchs have promoted for their own profit for going on five hundred years and which they have immorally and illegally foisted off on the people of this country and the rest of the world, too.

Then get on your broomsticks and fly in the faces of the members of the Territorial United States Congress and the Territorial State of State Governors and tell them exactly what you think of this system and also what you think of them for promoting it and allowing it to exist on our soil. Give them a copy of this article.

Then go rattle the cages of the local judges and "legislators" and demand to know what this hideous medieval practice is doing on our shores?  And who they think they are, to stand here in broad daylight and allow it?  And then write a letter to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and demand action against Britain.  And do the same with the United Nations Secretary General. 

Thank you, forever, Frank O'Collins and I quote:

Canon 3351 
In terms of the history of Birth Certificates, Settlement Certificates and diminishing, tricking, deceiving, lying, seizing, condemning and cursing free people as slaves, wards, infants, cattle, poor and commodities: (i) In 1535 (27Hen.8 c.28) King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar banking advisers seized the property of the poor and common farmers under the pretext they were “small religious estates”.

By 1539 (31Hen.8 c.13) he did the same for large religious estates. By 1540, (32Hen.8 c.1), all property was to be owned through “Estates” effectively being Welfare Funds granted by the Crown to the Benefit of use of Subjects with the most common being Estates for the non wealthy now considered “Wards of the Estate”.

Then in 1545 (37Hen.8 c.1) King Henry VIII reintroduced a title directly and solely connected to the slave trade of Rome, abolished by emperors and forbidden under Christian law called the “Custos Rotulorum” meaning literally “Keeper of the Slave Rolls” into every county, to maintain records of the Poor now as slaves. The same sacrilegious, immoral, ecclesiastically unlawful positions continued into the 21st Century as connected with Birth Certificates; and (ii) In 1547 (1Ed.6 c.3) ,

Edward VI issued a new statute that did forbid people considered poor from travelling, except for work, or from claiming their own time and activities and whether or not to work. All people (except those members of the ruling elite, particularly those non-Christian sects from Pisa, Venice and parts of Spain responsible for wholly false religious and legal texts) now declared slaves were either to be gainfully employed in the service of some lord or master, to work to death, or if they were found to be idle, or enjoying life then they were to be seized and permanently branded with a “V” and either sold as a slave or exterminated.

The only exception to the rule, were those men who chose to dedicate themselves to support the status quo and become educated and knowledgeable in the false texts and false scriptures of the slave masters. This act was supposed to have been repealed in 1549 (3&4Ed.6 c.16). However, the act was then restored to full effect in 1572 (14El. c.5) and through subsequent repeals of repeals, remains in force; and (iii) Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers.

In 1589 (31El c. 7) peasants then required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord's land was considered a "right". As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or "paupers" swelled as available to be press-ganged into work; and (iv) To placate the overwhelming hostility against England as a hellhole of slavery, exploitation and superstition, a new act was introduced in 1601 (43El. c.2 and “secret version” as 43 El. c.3) to begin to industrialize, hide and franchise slavery with the introduction of “overseers” of the poor as the foremen over the slaves, under a “cleric” of the parish and the renaming of children sold as sex slaves and workers to be called “Apprentices”.

Thus the Apprentiship system was invented not to improve conditions, but to “rebrand” slavery under the NonChristian English-Venetian-Pisan model of commerce. The act also introduced a new levy, collected by Parishes was called the "Poor Rates" (now called "council taxes") against wealthy property owners for their “rent” of use of the poor as slaves. This is the financial origin of Annuities 100 years later; and (v) Under Charles II of England, the concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined in 1662 (14Car.2 c.12) including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security” rolled into one document. A child's birthplace was its place of settlement, unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate.

However from the age of 7 upward the child could have been apprenticed and therefore “sold into servitude” for some rent paid back to the church as “poor taxes”. The act also made it easier for the “clearing of common houses of the poor” and for the first time made the definition of poor the value of tenancy being a taxable value of less than £10 per year. The act also modified the age of “emancipation” from child slavery to adult slavery as the age of 16; and (vi) Under the draconian and morally repugnant dictates of 1662 (14Car.2 c.12), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”.

If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers). From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice” when a sheriff removes people from their home; and (vii) In 1667 (19Car.2 c.4) the concept of “workhouses” were formalized and licensed as being effectively the very worst and hellish places where people considered “prisoners” could be “legally” and effectively worked to death for the profit of the elite pirates and thieves, under the full endorsement by the Church of England.

This is the act that invented the concept of “Employment” and an expansion of the highly profitable white slavery business models of English aristocracy. Thus, people who were taken into custody by virtue of being poor, were expected to work as well as live in conditions as traumatic and evil as any in civilized history; and (viii) The abuse of poor prisoners through the “workhouses” employment model was extremely profitable and a new act was required in 1670 (22Car.2 c.18) to regulate the corporations “renting” of prisoners as “employees” for profit, particularly in the paying of their accounts to the Crown; and (ix) Previous acts were continued and some made perpetual such as the controls over paperwork and “Settlement Certificates” as the origin and ancestor of Birth Certificates by James II in 1685 (1J.2. c. 17) as one of the few acts that the ruling elite permitted to remain as an active Statute of Westminster under his reign; and (x) Under William and Mary of Orange in 1691 (3W&M c.11), the acts of workhouses and abuse of the poor were continued and further refined, with greater oversight on paperwork and accounting for poor entering and leaving parishes, to prevent fraud by overseers and corporations; and (xi) In 1697 (3W&M. c.11), one of the more horrific of the wicked and morally repugnant acts of Westminster was the introduction (in §2) of the “badge” of the poor with the letter “P” to be worn at all times on the shoulder of the right sleeve.

Furthermore, all evidence as to “Jewish Badges” being introduced in Europe as early as the 13th Century is wholly and completely false, as the term “jew” was not revived until the 16th Century. Instead, the first examples of badges as a stigma to status is most likely this act and subsequent acts against the poor by banking and ruling elite who chose to identify themselves as members of the same non-Christian religion invented in the 16th Century that claimed to be victims of the same barbarity.

The use of the “P” as a form of curse and stigma is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as "P" (Paupers, Poor, Peasant, Prisoners, Property, Peon) used today; and (xii) In 1698 (9&10W3 c.11) an act reinforced the measurement of the poor being one who does not have an annual lease taxable at ten pounds or more, making at the time more than 95% of the population of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland “poor”; and (xiii) In 1713 (12Ann. S.2 c.18), the extension of Settlement Certificates as a form of negotiable Security was introduced for the first time (and continues with Birth Certificates today) whereby (§2) those born in a place but without a Settlement Certificate (including women and children), could be moved to a different location, such as a commercial workhouse when the “cost” of such certificates were purchased by a corporation; and (xiv) Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1722 a new law was passed (9Geo.1 c.7) in which those who had been thrown out of their homes or had their land seized by pirates and thieves operating with endorsement of Westminster and who sought relief from the Church to stay alive now had to “compete” to enter into a workhouse to survive.

Furthermore, the act expanded the ability for a wide variety of business owners to contract with churchwardens for the rent and use of the poor as “indentured servants” and “apprentices”. (xv) In 1733 (6Geo.2 c.32), one of the most inhumane and barbaric edicts in history was issued by Westminster (and remains an underlying pillar of the slave system today), whereby poor people who could not purchase a “license” to be considered married, would have their children deemed “bastards” and such children could then be seized by Churchwardens and “sold”.

Thus the baby slave trade was born and fully endorsed by the Church of England and British Society; and (xvi) In 1761 (2Geo.3 c.22), Westminster declared that all poor as mental “infants” and too stupid to realize the underlying system of slavery and complicity of the Christian Churches, were now to be cursed and doomed as “dead in law” by their registration in the Bills of Mortality and the creation of the “civil birth” rituals being rituals of death that continue today within modern hospitals and registration of new born babies. This was further reinforced with the act in 1767 (7Geo.3 c.39) that poor children were to be registered and considered “dead in law”; and (xvii) Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773 (13Geo.3 c.81), followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801 (41Geo.3 c.109),

English Parliament effectively "privatized" massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become "landless paupers" and therefore in need of parish assistance. In America, this caused massive rebellion as well as in Ireland and Scotland and contributed to forming a Patriot militia leading to the "War of Independence". Almost the entire Patriot milita were deceived, captured and executed in New York (in 1777) under a deal between George Washington of the United Company of Merchants Blue Army and General Cornwalis of the East India Company Red Army.

The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today; and (xviii) Because of the deliberate "legal" theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) (5&6Will.4 c.76) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly "employed" in a workhouse prison. Most importantly, much of the inhuman, barbaric and wholly immoral and sacriligeous framework of dictates and edicts of Westminster remained in force and were not repealed by this act).

Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being "wage slavery" or "lawful slavery" was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were continued to be worked "to death"; and (xix) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) (6&7Will.4 c.86) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes.

Thus on 1, July 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all "paupers" disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful ("voluntary") slaves with benefits provided by the local parish / region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today; and (xx) Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”.

The Local Government Act of 1871 (34&35Vict. c.70), Public Health Act 1872 (35&36Vict. c.79) and in 1874 (37&38Vict. c.89) and the Public Health Act 1875 (38&39Vict. c.55) created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public health matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”.

Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894 (57&58Vict. c.73), the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the concept of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other “Justices of the Peace”; and (xxi) In 1948, the National Assistance Act (11&12Geo.6 c.29) was introduced and supposed to abolish the Poor Laws. However, many of the most draconian poor law acts were not repealed or abolished as evidenced by the tables of repealed acts that miss key acts, otherwise remaining with full force and effect.

Canon 3352
Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.

Canon 3353
In respect of the adoption of the multiple functions of the use of the information and generic form of a Birth Certificate within present Western Roman Systems: (i) Whilst the same general form and extracted information almost exactly the same as a Birth Certificate may be used (eg a Bond, or other form of Security), unless it is officially “titled” a “Birth Certificate” it is not therefore a “Birth Certificate”; and (ii) There is no evidence that Bonds using the same information derived from the birth register information uses the title “Birth Certificate” (when it is most likely the term Bond is used). Therefore, any presumptions that precisely the same certificate is used for creating bonds is a gross error, when in fact the real question is the use of the information; and (iii) Ignorance in presuming the precise same form of a Birth Certificate is used in all cases of applying the information is a major contributor to permitting “plausible deniability” as to the use or misuse of such information by governments.

Canon 3354
In respect of the adoption of the Admiralty term “Birth” in relation to newborns: (i) The historic record of Statutes of Westminster are a highly unreliable indicator as to the origin of use of the word “Birth” in substitute for historic more ancient and more common terms in the English language such as nascence (from Latin nasci being “born”), or filial, or kin or born. In fact, the majority of European languages with poignant exception to English continue the tradition of using words descended from nasci to indicate the arrival of a new born; and (ii) Westminster statutes indicate the term Birth being used to describe newborns by the early 1700’s.

However, this should be discounted as almost certainly examples of deliberate fraud and corruption. Instead, the most likely introduction of the term Birth, to distinguish from Berth is by early 1800’s such as (6&7Will.4 c.86) following the transfer of control of the registration of all “vessels” to Admiralty in 1795 (35Geo.3 c.58) and reinforced in 1813 (54Geo.3 c.151) and 1823 with (4Geo.4 c.41).

Unquote.

And now, I think I shall go sew a patch with a "P" on it on all my clothing and if anyone asks, I shall tell them that it stands for "Pissed Off"---and hand them a copy of this article. 

If you agree that it is time to put an end to any and all institutions that condone  these practices,  join me in making this information go viral.  Discuss it with your Church groups and local assemblies, your Synagogues and schools, your Mosques and your fraternal organizations, your Chambers of Commerce, your hospital administrators, your friends and family in the military, everyone, everywhere. 

We now have the true Enemy in plain view and the methodology of the enslavement, too.  This comes hard on the heels of our discovery that Prince Philip collected $950 Trillion in "Life Force Value Annuities" out of the Canadian bankruptcy--- most of which belongs to Americans.

The "P" might also stand for "Phew!"

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

38 comments:

  1. It would appear that unless and until these Cannon Laws are disputed, claiming land status is futile since according to these, we never have had land prior to the birth certificate or any other registration process going back to the early/mid 1500's. Who actually set up the United Nations and World Health Organization? It seems they are the anchor to this crap at present.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Trumps apprentice Mara Lago hotel mossad . project . ping-pong . .........., settlement cirtificate.= homeland security checkpoint. CPS.childslavery.
    just new shingle on the door.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Prince Phillip is code for Thief of massive proportions. Scumbag of the universe. A poor excuse of a human being and just plain disgusting and vile.

    ReplyDelete
  4. YES BIG THANK YOU FRANK AS ALWAYS!!!
    I simplified it awhile back that the old English "Poor Laws" are basically our current "Public Policies".
    Slavery here was just revamped into modern employment, privately owned slaves were freed to become publicly(private federal)owned employees. all slaves were private property with papers and certificates of ownership, so when all these slaves were freed where were all these papers transferred ??? were these traded to the federal government by the states and counties and converted into bonds??? The 13th amendment was essentially a federal seizure of property(slaves), after most land was already sold off and profited from by the federal government pre civil war there was a major need for a new profit stream this became the new Federal Employee system of voluntary slavery and control of most industry through the employee, the 14th amendment was essentially the destruction of States sovereignty and the rise of the corporation into the new State status being protected and governed as "persons" by the federal government, now basically having total control of all commercial activities from the labour to future mega-corporations to flourish later.
    People want to claim there was a great inCorporation of the Federal Government, it was always a Corporation, the major change happened when Lincoln initiated the famous "Green Backs" which people want to say was some heroic move??? NO he needed this to fund his war and because the Green Backs were mostly backed by foreign investors THIS put the Union 100% into a foreign Maritime investment scheme and anyone meaning the States and new employees being paid and or benefiting with the new currency were now 100% commercial using bills of exchange now essentially stock shares of the first elastic US fiat currency.
    Also Black's define "certificate or registration" as basically the registration of a vessel now being clothed with a national identity. The modern Birth Certificate is the registration of this commercial vessel AKA commercial estate, all associated bond are maritime insurance bonds starting at birth with "bottomry bonds" for care and maintenance until the vessel is mature and seaworthy, by 25 additional bonds kick in from 25-65 its a 40 year cycle evidenced by the 10-40 form essentially the annuity payments to the bondholders, at 65 the bonds mature they are paid off and you receive your retirement compensation for 40 years of sailing the merchant vessel (citizen-ship).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Reposted your above amazing comment Mike here just now!

      https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/06/22/site-updates-and-one-quick-newq-qanon-greatawakening/#comment-3997

      Delete
  5. If any pope was half as good as DONALD J. TRUMP, he can fire me. Jesus is a Protestant Jew, for the record.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Was there ever proof of a record of Jesus entry day? Or was it hearsay? As I read there were even much older stories of such a man that predates the Jesus story by other areas of this plane it.So the jesus story is the youngest story of them all from what I gathered.
      Also is there not two types of the KIng James bible? Yes,I have seen one written for the Free Masons secret societies and one for the non members,whats with that?
      Are the Free Mason along with Albert Pike in line with Zi on jews and that they have created 2 world wars and they just need to trigger one more as in there script to full fill there agendas?
      WTF is this all about? There sure is a lot of scripts in this secret societies and the scriptures. Reads like a set up
      Hey don't beat me up do your own searches.Question everything.

      Delete
    2. I'll say one thing about the British monarchs....at least they realize that you have to change with the times and never rely on just one document forever, like Americans.....like the Constitution for the United States of America..!!! After 200 years since its conception, all we have been doing is arguing over it...!! The British are simply smarter than us when it comes to controlling the masses and the flow of currency....we deserve to be slaves if we insist on being under any contract or treaty....each individual makes his own "treaties"..He doesn't need any form of govt to do it for him, otherwise, you will always be slaves....this article proves it...!! For those who think they are going to be free with paperwork, they are already 3 steps ahead of you....The banks are already chipping all cards ANF will be getting rid of all previous cards withou one. And then finally the "coup De ta"....the mandatory "RFID" chip...they are already mandatory in Montana and other states are falling in line..!! I'm sure Trump thinks it's a good idea since he is so worried about "terrorist" and "illegal aliens"..He separated all the children from all the illegal refugees parents and putting them in all FEMA ..."Closed Walmarts". And there is a vast network of underground tunnels running all over the United States , which are connected to all 200 closed Walmarts....Walmarts that were closed and all employees given no notice at all before they closed them...!! All those mysterious "horns" people are talking about are coming from underground tunneling machines that sound exactly like horns reverberating the noise all around...people seem to have no clue what the sounds are or where they are coming from...there is a vast city underneath us, that is amazing in scope and size..!! A senator in Texas finally went to one in his state and he wasnt allowed in ..they have private security guards which will not allow anyone in...so either Trump will issue "gold-backed currentcy, or we will all wind up with "chips"....which do you think is going to be implemented...???

      Delete
  6. that's our CROWN of thorns...

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is the way it will be. Unlearned individuals will stay unlearned and continue to take everything the District of Columbia dishes out! Just the other day, a young kid I work with,( he is 21) was talking about who was running for office and who to vote for. I have told him of this movement. He knows of what I speak. He has looked up some of this for himself, but continues to use the "easy" terms, a voter, driver, us citizen, etc...
    I am afraid only a "few" of us will ever take the necessary steps to get out of their game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fruit, I agree; I surmise the same thing; few will take individual steps, and besides, it would be a never ending thing, with oldies dying off, and newbies coming out of school and into adulthood, which is never ending.

      This is why I think it will take Assemblies and setting up new true government, and simply passing these things as Laws via a Continental Congress in one fell swoop, across the board, and DONE. Even this will be like climbing mt. everest covered with ice.

      Delete
  8. The concept of natural law is the freeing of the mind from this history of political matrix tyranny.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. For the concept of the natural-law is with the freedom of the mind.
      For the freedom of the natural-law is with the freedom of the every-historical-political-matrix-tyranny.

      Delete
    3. Amen Coach..!! Finally someone gets it...!!

      Delete
  9. The history of human-trafficking goes back to the crucifixion of Jesus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for this historical information. Again. Again. Again.

      Delete
    2. For the human-trafficking of the fictional-legal-constructs is with a violation of the natural-law.

      Delete

    3. "There is reason, so far as I know, for everything including warts and stars in the sky.  I may not know the reason and I may not care what the reason is, either. " http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/01/england-again-and-always.html?m=1

      Delete
  10. For the driver-license, the insurance-policy, and the auto-registration are with the fictional-legal-constructs with a void-natural-law-standing.

    ReplyDelete
  11. https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6777420

    "The problem is the story isn’t true. We never actually abolished slavery. The 13th Amendment states:

    Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

    “...except as a punishment for crime...” This phrase gets ignored in America’s telling of its slavery story. The 13th Amendment did not abolish slavery but rather moved it from the plantation to the prison. In 2015, the 2 million (largely Black) people incarcerated in America are legally considered slaves under the Constitution. As a result, they can and are forced to work for pennies an hour with the profits going to counties, states and private corporations including Target, Revlon and Whole Foods. In fact, there are more Black people enslaved today than in 1800."

    ReplyDelete
  12. First of all, that was not the original 13th amendment...the original 13 amendment was about "titles of nobility" having no ability to assume any positions of authority, and Lincoln held up his decision to ratify it, until the "civil war " started, when Congress already approved it. So after the "civil war", the original 13th was changed to reflect the fighting of the war over slavery...!! That should have been the very first amendment so we woul DNT have these damn attorneys running everything...!! The forefathers weren't that smart...but hey, let's just keep arguing over that piece of "trash" for the next 200 years, after "chain gangs are reinstituted...forget paperwork..!! It's time we all stand up for something even if we have to declare WAR again...!! Everyone should be filing another "Declaration of Independance"..!! There is no mistaking that document...there is nothing in it that can be confused with the UNITED STATES,INC, (or any derivative of that word, or America...it is simply a statement of indepedance from any govt which wants to control people...!! They should have stopped right there, and never signed another Treaty after the Revolution....some idiot lent their signature to another contract after all that fighting...and we are supposed to be the stupid ones...from.what I have gathered we have never been intelligent...arrogant maybe, but never intelligent...!!! Just don't sign anything....period..!! It's you signature they are looking for....dont give it to them...!! Screw the paperwork..!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. They already have you all quoting "case law", like them..!! We don't care about case law...it doesn't apply to us....get a gun and learn how to use it...thats the best contract of all..!! And final..!!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. It's either that or another bloody war
    ..choose carefully..!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. The 13th Amendment opened the door for the Law Merchant and its agents the Esquires/Attorneys to now define and codify what constitutes a "crime". Slaves were freed then shortly after they became homeless vagrants and subject to the new vagrancy laws now becoming wards of the state and contracted out for labor these were essentially the first public employees some helped build the railroads.

    ReplyDelete
  16. C.Johnson...Resident = Resident Alien which usually means resident of a State and domiciled in D.C., why electing a state domicile is important defines your actual home/abode not simply your residential business address for receiving service of process as an agent/citizen, and they usually refer to the "Non-Resident Alien Individual" which is fully under their jurisdiction.
    Also you were talking about the UCC-1 , if you notice there is a box for "Transmitting Utility" by checking the box it is defining exactly what the fictional entity is so there is no later confusion.( I have not personally done it but people that did it many years ago use the term "judgement proof").

    ReplyDelete
  17. C.Joh..- See David Merrills work on "redeeming lawful money".
    Also I stated here before that the note was paid off basically on inception from what i understand in most commercial/Fed related cases, and (unknowingly)the full amount sits in an escrow account that can be used to pay-off the loan a separate entity/contract you agreed to pay on, when the escrow funds are not claimed the bank then claims by default after I believe 3 years as abandoned funds. The bank was elected as trustee of the property as servicing agent of the loan when you default your fiduciary duties they step in through foreclosure to control the property. True title to the property was never recorded in your name nor purchased in real money only private credit why in this system all "owners" are split title legal tenants no-one has true lawful complete title to most any property.
    So you believe these commercial loans are being given to private Americans in their private capacities and they have actual standing and not being administered to the legal US Citizen, if the name on the paperwork is ALL CAPS w/ a middle initial it is most likely a foreign trust entity that has legal ownership of the property and you are generally in a fiduciary capacity.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Well see you are quoting their definitions which actual placs you in their jurisdiction?
    This is beyond definitions but belief systems, if you believe you have some status as American State National when basically that's what the Queen mother considers us anyway under the Social Security Statutes all nationals of the territories/states regardless of US citizen status.
    The main question is when and where does this american national government come for the aid of its nationals when dealing with the US Government, does it not have an obligation or does it simply not exist ??? What I mean by beliefs, you can believe whatever you can imagine until reality destroys it whenever it sese fit. So rattling of definitions means nothing they are mere concepts that have nothing to do with reality or the truth yet will infer jurisdiction when attempting to use them in their courts for a benefit, unless you manage to bring counter suite through one the State National Courts ?
    Not a nube I've done thousands of hours of due diligence and have heard it all from almost everyone with something to say, so Like I stated boils down to believes so no disrespect.

    ReplyDelete
  19. thoroughly enjoyed your back and forth Mike V and C. Johnson! I learned a lot as well. thank you

    ReplyDelete
  20. C.Johnson, I tried similar umbrella when signing for my driver's licence here in Ontario and the signature was refused by the clerk. The "location" for the signature could contain ONLY the signature. So, while it may be a very legitimate offering, it depends upon the acceptance on the corporate side of the equation.

    ReplyDelete
  21. C. Johnson - I understand to the core, exactly what you are saying. You missed an important point in the opening sentence. I am from Ontario and while I know business under incorporation operate in the UCC business contract law framework, I don't have an equivalent USC 18-242. Canadian construct is a tad different than the American-in general terms. Even our Canadian Constitutional lawyer, Rocco Galati has been unsuccessful at 33% of his cases against the Government on these very basic issues. Even though in those cases he is right, the bank accounts of his clients runs out faster than the banks and government coffers. At 70 and a limited pension, there is a point of deciding where my efforts lie. If I were single and 50, my story would be much different.

    ReplyDelete
  22. C. Johnson Thank you for your assistance with the links, I will review them both. Yeah! Color/Colour depends on the dictionary used with the latter being English/Canadian. LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Mike V; I cannot understand how, quoting a government's definition would place anyone in the jurisdiction of that government. I think it's a matter of whether, or not, we accept the "contract" being offered, even though the "contract" is not disclosed, much less the terms and conditions and is also subject to our duress. Because we unknowingly do things that gives them an ability to "presume" we agreed to being a US Citizen, the burden is then on us to unravel the damn mess! Merely quoting a jurisdiction's definitions would not affect anyone being subject to it's "laws". If you quote definitions of Russia's "laws" are you now subject to Russia's jurisdiction?

    ReplyDelete
  24. C. Johnson, I've been very impressed with all your comments; you are genuinely helpful and demonstrate true wisdom and compassion! We are fortunate to have you on this site for sure! I have an issue I'd like to bounce off that wonderful mind of yours. I have had the same "personal" bank account for 11 years. Since discovering the Great Fraud, I've been signing everything, "By: My Name, All Rights Reserved, UCC1-308". After a recent deposit I noticed on the receipt, "Deposits governed by terms on your signature card." So naturally I wanted to just look at what terms this adhesion contract was attempting to bind me with. I naturally asked to see my signature card. The manager came back with a printout for me to inspect. Things really started taking an interesting turn when I told him I needed to see the one with my original, wet-ink signature. I mean, that photocopied signature could have been a skillful forgery, after all, and knowing bankers must spend their spare time dreaming up increasingly inventive ways to defraud their customers, I was asking a legitimate question. His response was, "It isn't kept at this branch." I asked, "Well, where is it kept?" to which he replied, "I don't know." You could tell I was on to something just by the silence in the bank and his genuine discomfort. So I simply let the silence drag on for a bit and said, "Well, let's just fill out a new one then." That's when he came back with a new contract, which superficially looked the same as the alleged photocopy of the "original" except that he was reclassifying me as a "Tenant" on the account instead of an "Owner", and had removed my beneficiary off the account completely. Needless to say I had no intention of signing it, I was strictly on an information gathering mission, after all, and pointed out the changes. He was clearly not going to address my questions, and was visibly uncomfortable. So he makes a call to a "higher up", and comes back with some person in "personal accounts customer service" and tells me from now on I must deal with her. I told him I would consider it, and would be in touch, but kept both copies of the alleged "original" signature card as well as the "new", unsigned signature card they were attempting to disenfranchise me from my own account with. Unlawful conversion of assets? Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law? I don't know, but two weeks later I receive a letter from that branch informing me, for no reason given, that they could not continue to offer me services anymore, and the account would be closed in one week's time. I can't help but think this stems from my insistence of my God-given rights, except for the fact that I did recently try to deposit a check through the ATM, which was rejected, with "Special Deposit: Redeemed in Lawful Money persualt to 42 USC 411" above my regular reservation-of-rights endorsement. What are your insights into this case? I am seriously considering sending a registered demand letter informing them that it has come to my attention that fraud may have occurred on one or more of my accounts and I am exhausting my administrative remedy to determine the nature and scope of the breach and demand a forensic account analysis showing all persons, entities, corporations, ect that have an interest in the account and see how many times the "bank" has loaned me their "credit" over the years.. LOL Any advice or insight from you would be very much appreciated, especially if you might know how to set up a new, "private" account sans a SSN and denominated in USD, not FRN's as Anna has suggested? Thank you in advance!

    ReplyDelete
  25. C. Johnson, Thanks for the replies! You make valid points I had not considered. I'm just a student of all this process and I do make mistakes, but am diligently trying to study to show myself approved to Jesus for the redemption granted me and be in the world but not of it any more than necessary. I understood that the name on the account stylized JOHN H. DOE was a public transmitting utility, and that having liened it as such on a UCC1 financing statement, which the bank has on file, HE, the public transmitting utility is under the UCC but not me, the real man in full life. So in my logic, claiming a reservation of rights and UCC1-308 didn't seem in error. Perhaps I was wrong in my assessment. In any case, the only reason the bank wanted me to sign another signature card was because they could not produce the original contract for my inspection because I suspect they have long ago monetized and hypothecated it ten times over, and it no longer exists. I would like to think the bank personnel are just clueless doe eyed little bunnies, but anyone following this site long enough would have to heartily disagree. I mean, look at what Anna says about how neurotic these bankers lives are; I'm sure a constant state of fraud brings just rewards from God. I agree closing the account probably isn't a bad idea, I have been actively searching for ways to open one as a state national without having to go the passport direction. Can't we just put "retired" as Anna suggests or "retired, not in commerce" on our US Citizen passport and Driver's license ? What about a Non-Political, common law ID? I also wish to thank you for clearing up my misunderstandin of the color of law code, I will definitely add that to my administrative toolkit!

    ReplyDelete
  26. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Be skeptical associated with credit score restore providers declaring that they're "in" using the credit agencies, possess some kind of unique agreement or even understand the solution strategy to create credit rating companies remove poor credit file out of your document. credit repair services

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.