Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 3300 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Thursday, June 14, 2018

Baby Slave Trade


By Anna Von Reitz

[Somehow there was a translation cut and copy error in the first release of this article so that some sections were repeated in Mac applications. This should now appear with no repeats.]

Baby Slave Trade

One of the chief obnoxious behaviors of our British Territorial United States "service providers" is to convert our names into their labels. They do this to their own people and they have been sneaking around doing it to us, too.

A friend just sent me a Prize Snippet from Frank O'Collin's work, his Canon of Positive Law, concerning the history and gross misuse of Birth Certificates.

After you've read these few paragraphs exposing how Birth Certificates came into being, stand back and take a deep breath and realize that this is all 100% anti-scriptural Satanic nonsense which the British Monarchs have promoted for their own profit for going on five hundred years and which they have immorally and illegally foisted off on the people of this country and the rest of the world, too.

Then get on your broomsticks and fly in the faces of the members of the Territorial United States Congress and the Territorial State of State Governors and tell them exactly what you think of this system and also what you think of them for promoting it and allowing it to exist on our soil. Give them a copy of this article.

Then go rattle the cages of the local judges and "legislators" and demand to know what this hideous medieval practice is doing on our shores?  And who they think they are, to stand here in broad daylight and allow it?  And then write a letter to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and demand action against Britain.  And do the same with the United Nations Secretary General. 

Thank you, forever, Frank O'Collins and I quote:

Canon 3351 
In terms of the history of Birth Certificates, Settlement Certificates and diminishing, tricking, deceiving, lying, seizing, condemning and cursing free people as slaves, wards, infants, cattle, poor and commodities: (i) In 1535 (27Hen.8 c.28) King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar banking advisers seized the property of the poor and common farmers under the pretext they were “small religious estates”.

By 1539 (31Hen.8 c.13) he did the same for large religious estates. By 1540, (32Hen.8 c.1), all property was to be owned through “Estates” effectively being Welfare Funds granted by the Crown to the Benefit of use of Subjects with the most common being Estates for the non wealthy now considered “Wards of the Estate”.

Then in 1545 (37Hen.8 c.1) King Henry VIII reintroduced a title directly and solely connected to the slave trade of Rome, abolished by emperors and forbidden under Christian law called the “Custos Rotulorum” meaning literally “Keeper of the Slave Rolls” into every county, to maintain records of the Poor now as slaves. The same sacrilegious, immoral, ecclesiastically unlawful positions continued into the 21st Century as connected with Birth Certificates; and (ii) In 1547 (1Ed.6 c.3) ,

Edward VI issued a new statute that did forbid people considered poor from travelling, except for work, or from claiming their own time and activities and whether or not to work. All people (except those members of the ruling elite, particularly those non-Christian sects from Pisa, Venice and parts of Spain responsible for wholly false religious and legal texts) now declared slaves were either to be gainfully employed in the service of some lord or master, to work to death, or if they were found to be idle, or enjoying life then they were to be seized and permanently branded with a “V” and either sold as a slave or exterminated.

The only exception to the rule, were those men who chose to dedicate themselves to support the status quo and become educated and knowledgeable in the false texts and false scriptures of the slave masters. This act was supposed to have been repealed in 1549 (3&4Ed.6 c.16). However, the act was then restored to full effect in 1572 (14El. c.5) and through subsequent repeals of repeals, remains in force; and (iii) Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers.

In 1589 (31El c. 7) peasants then required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord's land was considered a "right". As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or "paupers" swelled as available to be press-ganged into work; and (iv) To placate the overwhelming hostility against England as a hellhole of slavery, exploitation and superstition, a new act was introduced in 1601 (43El. c.2 and “secret version” as 43 El. c.3) to begin to industrialize, hide and franchise slavery with the introduction of “overseers” of the poor as the foremen over the slaves, under a “cleric” of the parish and the renaming of children sold as sex slaves and workers to be called “Apprentices”.

Thus the Apprentiship system was invented not to improve conditions, but to “rebrand” slavery under the NonChristian English-Venetian-Pisan model of commerce. The act also introduced a new levy, collected by Parishes was called the "Poor Rates" (now called "council taxes") against wealthy property owners for their “rent” of use of the poor as slaves. This is the financial origin of Annuities 100 years later; and (v) Under Charles II of England, the concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined in 1662 (14Car.2 c.12) including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security” rolled into one document. A child's birthplace was its place of settlement, unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate.

However from the age of 7 upward the child could have been apprenticed and therefore “sold into servitude” for some rent paid back to the church as “poor taxes”. The act also made it easier for the “clearing of common houses of the poor” and for the first time made the definition of poor the value of tenancy being a taxable value of less than £10 per year. The act also modified the age of “emancipation” from child slavery to adult slavery as the age of 16; and (vi) Under the draconian and morally repugnant dictates of 1662 (14Car.2 c.12), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”.

If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers). From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice” when a sheriff removes people from their home; and (vii) In 1667 (19Car.2 c.4) the concept of “workhouses” were formalized and licensed as being effectively the very worst and hellish places where people considered “prisoners” could be “legally” and effectively worked to death for the profit of the elite pirates and thieves, under the full endorsement by the Church of England.

This is the act that invented the concept of “Employment” and an expansion of the highly profitable white slavery business models of English aristocracy. Thus, people who were taken into custody by virtue of being poor, were expected to work as well as live in conditions as traumatic and evil as any in civilized history; and (viii) The abuse of poor prisoners through the “workhouses” employment model was extremely profitable and a new act was required in 1670 (22Car.2 c.18) to regulate the corporations “renting” of prisoners as “employees” for profit, particularly in the paying of their accounts to the Crown; and (ix) Previous acts were continued and some made perpetual such as the controls over paperwork and “Settlement Certificates” as the origin and ancestor of Birth Certificates by James II in 1685 (1J.2. c. 17) as one of the few acts that the ruling elite permitted to remain as an active Statute of Westminster under his reign; and (x) Under William and Mary of Orange in 1691 (3W&M c.11), the acts of workhouses and abuse of the poor were continued and further refined, with greater oversight on paperwork and accounting for poor entering and leaving parishes, to prevent fraud by overseers and corporations; and (xi) In 1697 (3W&M. c.11), one of the more horrific of the wicked and morally repugnant acts of Westminster was the introduction (in §2) of the “badge” of the poor with the letter “P” to be worn at all times on the shoulder of the right sleeve.

Furthermore, all evidence as to “Jewish Badges” being introduced in Europe as early as the 13th Century is wholly and completely false, as the term “jew” was not revived until the 16th Century. Instead, the first examples of badges as a stigma to status is most likely this act and subsequent acts against the poor by banking and ruling elite who chose to identify themselves as members of the same non-Christian religion invented in the 16th Century that claimed to be victims of the same barbarity.

The use of the “P” as a form of curse and stigma is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as "P" (Paupers, Poor, Peasant, Prisoners, Property, Peon) used today; and (xii) In 1698 (9&10W3 c.11) an act reinforced the measurement of the poor being one who does not have an annual lease taxable at ten pounds or more, making at the time more than 95% of the population of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland “poor”; and (xiii) In 1713 (12Ann. S.2 c.18), the extension of Settlement Certificates as a form of negotiable Security was introduced for the first time (and continues with Birth Certificates today) whereby (§2) those born in a place but without a Settlement Certificate (including women and children), could be moved to a different location, such as a commercial workhouse when the “cost” of such certificates were purchased by a corporation; and (xiv) Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1722 a new law was passed (9Geo.1 c.7) in which those who had been thrown out of their homes or had their land seized by pirates and thieves operating with endorsement of Westminster and who sought relief from the Church to stay alive now had to “compete” to enter into a workhouse to survive.

Furthermore, the act expanded the ability for a wide variety of business owners to contract with churchwardens for the rent and use of the poor as “indentured servants” and “apprentices”. (xv) In 1733 (6Geo.2 c.32), one of the most inhumane and barbaric edicts in history was issued by Westminster (and remains an underlying pillar of the slave system today), whereby poor people who could not purchase a “license” to be considered married, would have their children deemed “bastards” and such children could then be seized by Churchwardens and “sold”.

Thus the baby slave trade was born and fully endorsed by the Church of England and British Society; and (xvi) In 1761 (2Geo.3 c.22), Westminster declared that all poor as mental “infants” and too stupid to realize the underlying system of slavery and complicity of the Christian Churches, were now to be cursed and doomed as “dead in law” by their registration in the Bills of Mortality and the creation of the “civil birth” rituals being rituals of death that continue today within modern hospitals and registration of new born babies. This was further reinforced with the act in 1767 (7Geo.3 c.39) that poor children were to be registered and considered “dead in law”; and (xvii) Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773 (13Geo.3 c.81), followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801 (41Geo.3 c.109),

English Parliament effectively "privatized" massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become "landless paupers" and therefore in need of parish assistance. In America, this caused massive rebellion as well as in Ireland and Scotland and contributed to forming a Patriot militia leading to the "War of Independence". Almost the entire Patriot milita were deceived, captured and executed in New York (in 1777) under a deal between George Washington of the United Company of Merchants Blue Army and General Cornwalis of the East India Company Red Army.

The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today; and (xviii) Because of the deliberate "legal" theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) (5&6Will.4 c.76) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly "employed" in a workhouse prison. Most importantly, much of the inhuman, barbaric and wholly immoral and sacriligeous framework of dictates and edicts of Westminster remained in force and were not repealed by this act).

Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being "wage slavery" or "lawful slavery" was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were continued to be worked "to death"; and (xix) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) (6&7Will.4 c.86) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes.

Thus on 1, July 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all "paupers" disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful ("voluntary") slaves with benefits provided by the local parish / region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today; and (xx) Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”.

The Local Government Act of 1871 (34&35Vict. c.70), Public Health Act 1872 (35&36Vict. c.79) and in 1874 (37&38Vict. c.89) and the Public Health Act 1875 (38&39Vict. c.55) created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public health matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”.

Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894 (57&58Vict. c.73), the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the concept of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other “Justices of the Peace”; and (xxi) In 1948, the National Assistance Act (11&12Geo.6 c.29) was introduced and supposed to abolish the Poor Laws. However, many of the most draconian poor law acts were not repealed or abolished as evidenced by the tables of repealed acts that miss key acts, otherwise remaining with full force and effect.

Canon 3352
Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.

Canon 3353
In respect of the adoption of the multiple functions of the use of the information and generic form of a Birth Certificate within present Western Roman Systems: (i) Whilst the same general form and extracted information almost exactly the same as a Birth Certificate may be used (eg a Bond, or other form of Security), unless it is officially “titled” a “Birth Certificate” it is not therefore a “Birth Certificate”; and (ii) There is no evidence that Bonds using the same information derived from the birth register information uses the title “Birth Certificate” (when it is most likely the term Bond is used). Therefore, any presumptions that precisely the same certificate is used for creating bonds is a gross error, when in fact the real question is the use of the information; and (iii) Ignorance in presuming the precise same form of a Birth Certificate is used in all cases of applying the information is a major contributor to permitting “plausible deniability” as to the use or misuse of such information by governments.

Canon 3354
In respect of the adoption of the Admiralty term “Birth” in relation to newborns: (i) The historic record of Statutes of Westminster are a highly unreliable indicator as to the origin of use of the word “Birth” in substitute for historic more ancient and more common terms in the English language such as nascence (from Latin nasci being “born”), or filial, or kin or born. In fact, the majority of European languages with poignant exception to English continue the tradition of using words descended from nasci to indicate the arrival of a new born; and (ii) Westminster statutes indicate the term Birth being used to describe newborns by the early 1700’s.

However, this should be discounted as almost certainly examples of deliberate fraud and corruption. Instead, the most likely introduction of the term Birth, to distinguish from Berth is by early 1800’s such as (6&7Will.4 c.86) following the transfer of control of the registration of all “vessels” to Admiralty in 1795 (35Geo.3 c.58) and reinforced in 1813 (54Geo.3 c.151) and 1823 with (4Geo.4 c.41).

Unquote.

And now, I think I shall go sew a patch with a "P" on it on all my clothing and if anyone asks, I shall tell them that it stands for "Pissed Off"---and hand them a copy of this article. 

If you agree that it is time to put an end to any and all institutions that condone  these practices,  join me in making this information go viral.  Discuss it with your Church groups and local assemblies, your Synagogues and schools, your Mosques and your fraternal organizations, your Chambers of Commerce, your hospital administrators, your friends and family in the military, everyone, everywhere. 

We now have the true Enemy in plain view and the methodology of the enslavement, too.  This comes hard on the heels of our discovery that Prince Philip collected $950 Trillion in "Life Force Value Annuities" out of the Canadian bankruptcy--- most of which belongs to Americans.

The "P" might also stand for "Phew!"

----------------------------
See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

64 comments:

  1. It's all about capacity; they make us all WARDS OF THE STATE and they do this by giving us the STATUS of: a child or incapacitated person, neither of which can take care of themselves or their affairs. So they step up to make sure they talk care of us. That's why they issue the B/C's at birth, when we are babies. Everyone knows babies can't take care of themselves. The issue being, no one ever takes their own lives back from that status, because they don't know what has been done to them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It would appear that unless and until these Cannon Laws are disputed, claiming land status is futile since according to these, we never have had land prior to the birth certificate or any other registration process going back to the early/mid 1500's. Who actually set up the United Nations and World Health Organization? It seems they are the anchor to this crap at present.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Trumps apprentice Mara Lago hotel mossad . project . ping-pong . .........., settlement cirtificate.= homeland security checkpoint. CPS.childslavery.
    just new shingle on the door.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Prince Phillip is code for Thief of massive proportions. Scumbag of the universe. A poor excuse of a human being and just plain disgusting and vile.

    ReplyDelete
  5. YES BIG THANK YOU FRANK AS ALWAYS!!!
    I simplified it awhile back that the old English "Poor Laws" are basically our current "Public Policies".
    Slavery here was just revamped into modern employment, privately owned slaves were freed to become publicly(private federal)owned employees. all slaves were private property with papers and certificates of ownership, so when all these slaves were freed where were all these papers transferred ??? were these traded to the federal government by the states and counties and converted into bonds??? The 13th amendment was essentially a federal seizure of property(slaves), after most land was already sold off and profited from by the federal government pre civil war there was a major need for a new profit stream this became the new Federal Employee system of voluntary slavery and control of most industry through the employee, the 14th amendment was essentially the destruction of States sovereignty and the rise of the corporation into the new State status being protected and governed as "persons" by the federal government, now basically having total control of all commercial activities from the labour to future mega-corporations to flourish later.
    People want to claim there was a great inCorporation of the Federal Government, it was always a Corporation, the major change happened when Lincoln initiated the famous "Green Backs" which people want to say was some heroic move??? NO he needed this to fund his war and because the Green Backs were mostly backed by foreign investors THIS put the Union 100% into a foreign Maritime investment scheme and anyone meaning the States and new employees being paid and or benefiting with the new currency were now 100% commercial using bills of exchange now essentially stock shares of the first elastic US fiat currency.
    Also Black's define "certificate or registration" as basically the registration of a vessel now being clothed with a national identity. The modern Birth Certificate is the registration of this commercial vessel AKA commercial estate, all associated bond are maritime insurance bonds starting at birth with "bottomry bonds" for care and maintenance until the vessel is mature and seaworthy, by 25 additional bonds kick in from 25-65 its a 40 year cycle evidenced by the 10-40 form essentially the annuity payments to the bondholders, at 65 the bonds mature they are paid off and you receive your retirement compensation for 40 years of sailing the merchant vessel (citizen-ship).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Reposted your above amazing comment Mike here just now!

      https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/06/22/site-updates-and-one-quick-newq-qanon-greatawakening/#comment-3997

      Delete
  6. If any pope was half as good as DONALD J. TRUMP, he can fire me. Jesus is a Protestant Jew, for the record.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Was there ever proof of a record of Jesus entry day? Or was it hearsay? As I read there were even much older stories of such a man that predates the Jesus story by other areas of this plane it.So the jesus story is the youngest story of them all from what I gathered.
      Also is there not two types of the KIng James bible? Yes,I have seen one written for the Free Masons secret societies and one for the non members,whats with that?
      Are the Free Mason along with Albert Pike in line with Zi on jews and that they have created 2 world wars and they just need to trigger one more as in there script to full fill there agendas?
      WTF is this all about? There sure is a lot of scripts in this secret societies and the scriptures. Reads like a set up
      Hey don't beat me up do your own searches.Question everything.

      Delete
    2. I'll say one thing about the British monarchs....at least they realize that you have to change with the times and never rely on just one document forever, like Americans.....like the Constitution for the United States of America..!!! After 200 years since its conception, all we have been doing is arguing over it...!! The British are simply smarter than us when it comes to controlling the masses and the flow of currency....we deserve to be slaves if we insist on being under any contract or treaty....each individual makes his own "treaties"..He doesn't need any form of govt to do it for him, otherwise, you will always be slaves....this article proves it...!! For those who think they are going to be free with paperwork, they are already 3 steps ahead of you....The banks are already chipping all cards ANF will be getting rid of all previous cards withou one. And then finally the "coup De ta"....the mandatory "RFID" chip...they are already mandatory in Montana and other states are falling in line..!! I'm sure Trump thinks it's a good idea since he is so worried about "terrorist" and "illegal aliens"..He separated all the children from all the illegal refugees parents and putting them in all FEMA ..."Closed Walmarts". And there is a vast network of underground tunnels running all over the United States , which are connected to all 200 closed Walmarts....Walmarts that were closed and all employees given no notice at all before they closed them...!! All those mysterious "horns" people are talking about are coming from underground tunneling machines that sound exactly like horns reverberating the noise all around...people seem to have no clue what the sounds are or where they are coming from...there is a vast city underneath us, that is amazing in scope and size..!! A senator in Texas finally went to one in his state and he wasnt allowed in ..they have private security guards which will not allow anyone in...so either Trump will issue "gold-backed currentcy, or we will all wind up with "chips"....which do you think is going to be implemented...???

      Delete
  7. 13th amendment, Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction and Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
    BUT, THEN COMES: the 14th and 16th amendment and they created a citizen, known as the U.S. Citizen and Peonage. http://www.pbs.org/tpt/slavery-by-another-name/themes/peonage/ Now, let's ask ourselves, how do they get by with slavery, involuntary servitude and peonage of a real man, woman and child, when throughout United States of America law and American Jurisprudence, it is unlawful. Because of the birth certificate. They are not taking real men, women and children captive (according to them and their system) they are taking captive U.S. CITIZENS. U.S. CITIZENS are legal fictions according to their own definition of legal persons. The Supreme Court ruled IN: FACT there are no U.S. CITIZENS. The only place U.S. Citizens exist is as a fictitious identity. IT'S NOT REAL! So, they can make a fictitious identity, anything that want, because its all fiction. That identity can be a slave, an involuntary servant or suffer peonage. What does it matter they are not implying the U.S. CITIZEN is a real man, woman or child. They tell us, in their definitions what a U. S. Citizen is...it is a legal person. A legal person is a fiction, it is a corporate entity. But, the People, don't want to believe them, when they put it right in the codes, that the identity of a U.S.CITIZEN is a fiction (fraud) it doesn't exist. It's all a game! Anyone who goes along with the game and says they are the U.S. CITIZEN, deserves to be a WARD OF THE COURT ruled to be incapacitated. Who in their right minds would go along with saying they were a fictitious entity, instead of being a real man, woman or child? But, U.S.CITIZENS agree to it everyday, never ever ask, their own selves; 'WAIT A MINUTE, WHAT AM I AGREEING TO'! Here's your answer, everytime you check the box yes "you are a U.S. CITIZEN" you are agreeing to be their fiction (something they made up, to trick you)! NOTE: there's a mega difference between RESIDENT and NON-RESIDENT alien. RESIDENT ALIEN: one who live here, but is not a U.S. Citizen. NON-RESIDENT ALIEN American: one who lives here, but is not subject to the jurisdiction of DC, the districts, military enclaves, territory and possessions (THE UNITED STATES, INC). Americans never claim U.S. residency.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6777420

      "The problem is the story isn’t true. We never actually abolished slavery. The 13th Amendment states:

      Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

      “...except as a punishment for crime...” This phrase gets ignored in America’s telling of its slavery story. The 13th Amendment did not abolish slavery but rather moved it from the plantation to the prison. In 2015, the 2 million (largely Black) people incarcerated in America are legally considered slaves under the Constitution. As a result, they can and are forced to work for pennies an hour with the profits going to counties, states and private corporations including Target, Revlon and Whole Foods. In fact, there are more Black people enslaved today than in 1800."

      Delete
    2. Leland, that is exactly right. As I stated above: 13th amendment: then the 14th and 16th and peonage. ON PAPER: they took away slavery, involuntary servitude and peonage.but then immediately following, ON PAPER (again) they began using the acts of congress combined with the 14th and 16th amendment to enslave all mankind. This is what they always do. On one piece of paper they do something, then on another piece of paper they reverse it right back. It's all in how the paper is administered. slavery was never officially outlawed, it was only expanded: how? BY MAKING PEOPLE THINK (mind control) they were 14TH amendment U.S. CITIZENS. That's where the fullness of the slavery begins. But, let's remember the IMAGE THEY CREATE: we ended slavery by the 13th amendment. You can not find slavery being lawful ON PAPER in America again. But, the trick is: don't tell anyone slavery will continue in the form of U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND INCOME TAX. All they did, was change the paper. Who gave them the right to use paper against us? We do every time we sign it!

      Delete
    3. MAKE SOME NOISE...reverse your signature on paper. fill out the editable forms.

      Delete
    4. First of all, that was not the original 13th amendment...the original 13 amendment was about "titles of nobility" having no ability to assume any positions of authority, and Lincoln held up his decision to ratify it, until the "civil war " started, when Congress already approved it. So after the "civil war", the original 13th was changed to reflect the fighting of the war over slavery...!! That should have been the very first amendment so we woul DNT have these damn attorneys running everything...!! The forefathers weren't that smart...but hey, let's just keep arguing over that piece of "trash" for the next 200 years, after "chain gangs are reinstituted...forget paperwork..!! It's time we all stand up for something even if we have to declare WAR again...!! Everyone should be filing another "Declaration of Independance"..!! There is no mistaking that document...there is nothing in it that can be confused with the UNITED STATES,INC, (or any derivative of that word, or America...it is simply a statement of indepedance from any govt which wants to control people...!! They should have stopped right there, and never signed another Treaty after the Revolution....some idiot lent their signature to another contract after all that fighting...and we are supposed to be the stupid ones...from.what I have gathered we have never been intelligent...arrogant maybe, but never intelligent...!!! Just don't sign anything....period..!! It's you signature they are looking for....dont give it to them...!! Screw the paperwork..!!

      Delete
    5. They already have you all quoting "case law", like them..!! We don't care about case law...it doesn't apply to us....get a gun and learn how to use it...thats the best contract of all..!! And final..!!!

      Delete
    6. James case law is AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE. Common law is case law or another definition...NON-LEGISLATIVE LAW. legislative law is the system.

      Delete
    7. The 13th Amendment opened the door for the Law Merchant and its agents the Esquires/Attorneys to now define and codify what constitutes a "crime". Slaves were freed then shortly after they became homeless vagrants and subject to the new vagrancy laws now becoming wards of the state and contracted out for labor these were essentially the first public employees some helped build the railroads.

      Delete
    8. C.Johnson...Resident = Resident Alien which usually means resident of a State and domiciled in D.C., why electing a state domicile is important defines your actual home/abode not simply your residential business address for receiving service of process as an agent/citizen, and they usually refer to the "Non-Resident Alien Individual" which is fully under their jurisdiction.
      Also you were talking about the UCC-1 , if you notice there is a box for "Transmitting Utility" by checking the box it is defining exactly what the fictional entity is so there is no later confusion.( I have not personally done it but people that did it many years ago use the term "judgement proof").

      Delete
    9. mike here's the definition for RESIDENT ALIEN: https://www.uscis.gov/tools/glossary/resident-alien
      and here's the definition for RESIDENT. Anyone who is here LEGALLY (LEGAL being the defining status), is a resident of the U.S. Americans are not here legally, they are lawfully here not by US law, but by act of their creator. Remember the US govt, gets to define immigration terms. Their term for aliens, who live here and ARE UNDER THEIR JURISDICTION: RESIDENTS. An American is not under the jurisdiction of the U.S. and is classified as A 'NON-RESIDENT' (meaning we do not have a home within the U.S.) its on the land of America. NEXT THE ALIEN PART: All Americans are aliens to the US. So non-resident alien is American, ONLY, living in one of the 50 states and having nativity in one of the 50 states. Remember the US is not America. It is wholly separate from the US and so are the people. I don't mess with UCC-1, that is a US LAW. As an American State National, I do my best to stay out of US LAW. There are ways to handle your financial issues, via contracts. Contracts are agreements that can exist WITHOUT the US infringement, by its laws. That's why I use contracts for conducting my business. US laws are meant to entrap, the more you stay away from them, the freer you will be. Anyone who use UCC1 is subject to the laws of the US. A maxim of law is that we are subject to the laws to which we agree and use.

      Delete
    10. ps. sorry forget to post the link to permanent resident https://www.uscis.gov/tools/glossary/lawful-permanent-resident

      Delete
    11. Mike, let me add this: about as deep as I usually go into the US jurisdiction, is the status of U.S. National. I usually try to stay out of the status of U.S. Citizen in most cases. My preferred status is American State National and I try to use it most often, because the keeps me completely out of US Jurisdiction. But, sometimes I do have to cross over, but I try to keep it brief and very limited. I don't visit the US very often, they are monsters over there and will chew you up and spit you out. I'd rather been safe at home, on my land.

      Delete
    12. Well see you are quoting their definitions which actual placs you in their jurisdiction?
      This is beyond definitions but belief systems, if you believe you have some status as American State National when basically that's what the Queen mother considers us anyway under the Social Security Statutes all nationals of the territories/states regardless of US citizen status.
      The main question is when and where does this american national government come for the aid of its nationals when dealing with the US Government, does it not have an obligation or does it simply not exist ??? What I mean by beliefs, you can believe whatever you can imagine until reality destroys it whenever it sese fit. So rattling of definitions means nothing they are mere concepts that have nothing to do with reality or the truth yet will infer jurisdiction when attempting to use them in their courts for a benefit, unless you manage to bring counter suite through one the State National Courts ?
      Not a nube I've done thousands of hours of due diligence and have heard it all from almost everyone with something to say, so Like I stated boils down to believes so no disrespect.

      Delete
    13. Mike V; I cannot understand how, quoting a government's definition would place anyone in the jurisdiction of that government. I think it's a matter of whether, or not, we accept the "contract" being offered, even though the "contract" is not disclosed, much less the terms and conditions and is also subject to our duress. Because we unknowingly do things that gives them an ability to "presume" we agreed to being a US Citizen, the burden is then on us to unravel the damn mess! Merely quoting a jurisdiction's definitions would not affect anyone being subject to it's "laws". If you quote definitions of Russia's "laws" are you now subject to Russia's jurisdiction?

      Delete
    14. Jack let me take it a step further, if I may: Go to court. Ask to see the contract bearing both your and the prosecutors signature. He-she will tell you they are not a party to it. Then who is? That person has to come forward, because if the prosecutor won't produce the contract because they are not a party to it, they are telling you they don't represent the party. So who is the true representative of the party? Someone has the contract and has the right to enforce it, if it has been civilly or criminally breached and if the prosecutor isn't representing the party civilly or criminally, then who the heck is the prosecutor representing? The state? OK lets see the contract with the state, to which I signed and gave the state civil authority and or criminal authority and I also want to see the prosecutors signature on the contract he has with the state that gives him the P.O.A. to represent the state. Then I want to see the verified criminal complaint of the state, claiming injury or just a claim by the state they were injured. Now, if these documents can't be disclosed, we got a major problem. Either the court or the prosecutor are committing fraud and if the court persists, the judge has a problem. See the true and real injured party has to make a written complaint or it can be the representative if the injured party is dead. Now, legal representatives are all next of kin. Now, what next of kin, signed a complaint and contract with the prosecutor so the prosecutor could represent the dead or injured? see the prosecutor is representing the state, by what is the paper trail back to the dead or injured party? Did the dead person ever willingly and knowingly ever sign anything, where they agreed to be legal property slaves of the state? Can the state prove such a contract existed (because isn't it true slavery and INVOLUNTARY servitude is outlawed in the United States? LOL). So there's a whole lot of issues, that need to be DISCOVERED, IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH JURISDICTION FOR THE COURT TO HEAR THE ACTION! I mean if you think about it, this could get really deep. This thing is so important: there has to be a papertrail from the injured person, to the court by a contract with the defendant. Everyone has to be connected. Here's an example: ever signed a contract and the company you are signing the contract, tells you who will be the attorneys mediating any disputes? Why would that be in the contract? Go deep!

      Delete
    15. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  8. U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) "The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress." for more of an understanding on legal fictions: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/35241/1/Soifer_20GaLRev871.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is the way it will be. Unlearned individuals will stay unlearned and continue to take everything the District of Columbia dishes out! Just the other day, a young kid I work with,( he is 21) was talking about who was running for office and who to vote for. I have told him of this movement. He knows of what I speak. He has looked up some of this for himself, but continues to use the "easy" terms, a voter, driver, us citizen, etc...
    I am afraid only a "few" of us will ever take the necessary steps to get out of their game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fruit, I agree; I surmise the same thing; few will take individual steps, and besides, it would be a never ending thing, with oldies dying off, and newbies coming out of school and into adulthood, which is never ending.

      This is why I think it will take Assemblies and setting up new true government, and simply passing these things as Laws via a Continental Congress in one fell swoop, across the board, and DONE. Even this will be like climbing mt. everest covered with ice.

      Delete
  10. The concept of natural law is the freeing of the mind from this history of political matrix tyranny.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. For the concept of the natural-law is with the freedom of the mind.
      For the freedom of the natural-law is with the freedom of the every-historical-political-matrix-tyranny.

      Delete
    3. Amen Coach..!! Finally someone gets it...!!

      Delete
  11. The history of human-trafficking goes back to the crucifixion of Jesus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for this historical information. Again. Again. Again.

      Delete
    2. For the human-trafficking of the fictional-legal-constructs is with a violation of the natural-law.

      Delete

    3. "There is reason, so far as I know, for everything including warts and stars in the sky.  I may not know the reason and I may not care what the reason is, either. " http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/01/england-again-and-always.html?m=1

      Delete
  12. For the driver-license, the insurance-policy, and the auto-registration are with the fictional-legal-constructs with a void-natural-law-standing.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's either that or another bloody war
    ..choose carefully..!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. JAMES, still thinking about your situation. Now, I'm thinking out loud. Maybe what we all need to do, is to think and learn about NOTES AND THE INTEREST THEY BEAR AND WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS AT THE SIGNING OF ONE AND HOW TO USE CONTRACTS. I know people are using UCC1 but I never have and I think using it lacks wisdom. The UCC1 is a commercial contract and its the commercial that ties us into the slave-servant thing. But, Americans use private contracts not commercial to conduct their business. So when we sign a note, we become the first lienholder on the note and all the interest it bears. the full note and interest is paid to the bearer of the note, the bank who recd it. the fed uses the currency for the note and the interest + 10 plus percent interest on the currency. The production of all that currency then comes back on the U.S. CITIZEN in IRS taxes. The American is entitled to the NOTE PLUS THE INTEREST ON THAT NOTE, just like the bank was before it was paid and the fed does when it puts its notes out. Its notes are generated by our note and their notes are interest bearing too! they won't have any problem foreclosing on houses, cars, anything that uses their notes, if the US GOVT does continue to collect the debt payments through the IRS.
    That's how the entire system works. So when your house was repo'd you had the right in the settlement of the debt to be first in line lien holder to the note and the interest on the note. I am not sure, but I think the note would have covered the note plus the interest you applied to all the payments on the note. Man that could be a big haul for you as damages. I mean I don't know for certain and requires more research. But, I do know this for certain, that is how the currency is created by the fed and why IRS exists. That for certain is how the system works. So my question is, when the NOTE is originally signed, why can't we demand in the contract, that all payments with interest be rescinded upon the bank recg its cut? because I am just thinking, the bank got the note as payment, then it get payment from the fed and turns over the note. so who really has the note plus the interest? if the bank got paid in full, then why are you still having to make payments? maybe we haven't been aware on how to use our own Notes!I know attorneys around the country are suing for their clients to retrieve the notes or the amount of the notes plus interest, that should tell us all something. i mean its not a secret. its just something we haven't understood. maybe its time we do. Maybe its time to throw out the UCC1 SLAVE CRAP and look at the NOTES PLUS INTEREST.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. C.Joh..- See David Merrills work on "redeeming lawful money".
      Also I stated here before that the note was paid off basically on inception from what i understand in most commercial/Fed related cases, and (unknowingly)the full amount sits in an escrow account that can be used to pay-off the loan a separate entity/contract you agreed to pay on, when the escrow funds are not claimed the bank then claims by default after I believe 3 years as abandoned funds. The bank was elected as trustee of the property as servicing agent of the loan when you default your fiduciary duties they step in through foreclosure to control the property. True title to the property was never recorded in your name nor purchased in real money only private credit why in this system all "owners" are split title legal tenants no-one has true lawful complete title to most any property.
      So you believe these commercial loans are being given to private Americans in their private capacities and they have actual standing and not being administered to the legal US Citizen, if the name on the paperwork is ALL CAPS w/ a middle initial it is most likely a foreign trust entity that has legal ownership of the property and you are generally in a fiduciary capacity.

      Delete
  15. Mike V. people who do what you are saying, are free to do whatever they desire to do. You are talking to me, within the mind set of a US Citizen. I am not of that mindset, I think differently. Thinking is the key. If you can't think for yourself, you can't solve your own life issues. I am telling you there are other avenues to pursue than the way you are choosing to go about it. Now, if that is the way you want to go about it...then more power to you. But, there is a higher and better way to exist. Think about this: take your driver's license out of your wallet. Look at the name on top of it, then look at your signature on the bottom of it. Then ask yourself this one question: why did they not use my signature name on the bottom of the license, why did they have to misconstrue it and make the last name first? Then ask: why wasn't your signature name enough on the document? then ask this question, why does U.C.C. 1-308 exist as law within the United States? How does just that one code, change the jurisdiction? See if you can answer those questions and come to the full understanding of status, capacity and standing, you will be a lot farther down the road toward you freedom. Oh and let me ask you this one final question: in US title 8, why is there an entity known as a US National and a US citizen defined and what is the difference between them? What is the difference between a U.S.National and a U.S. Person? And why is there separate offices (other than post offices) where U.S. Nationals apply for their passports? If they make a distinction, shouldn't you? Mike there are many difference ways to skin a cat, the more you think the more ways you will come up with to handle your own affairs!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Mike V. just a story for you, I am working with a friend on docs for his standing a grantor, first lien holder and obligee of the note, on the mortgage when his house was foreclosed. FYI for you to think about: He is the TRUE and LIVING grantor of the trust (at treasury) and his birth certificate number was used to create the note. That is what happened when he signed the mortgage and the note. On the contract for the mortgage he was the obligor-the debtor, on the note side he was the obligee. So he has 2 positions in this affair. He has the position of owner of the note and debtor on the mortgage. All of this is through the trust. Now when, the mortgage company ACCEPTED THE NOTE, they were paid in full. The mortgage AT THAT MOMENT should have been discharged. It wasn't. Not, only did they not discharge the mortgage payments, as paid in full. They eventually foreclosed on the house and took it. But, they never paid the obligee for the note. They also never returned the note. Now the note, does not belong to the banks, it belongs to the obligee, because it came from the trust bearing his birth certificate number. So now, he's going to demand the return of the note and all transactionS everywhere that have been transacted to be rescinded or he is going to offer them the opportunity to buy the note from him with the interest due. Now, the SS# to get the mortgage was the SS# for the obligor. The obligor lost the house. But, now the obligee, can get the money or collapse every note associated with his note. What position has the power? the obligee or the obligor. He is a living man on the land, with all power of the pen. His name (title) is the legal person. Two separate positions, two separate id numbers used, two separate levels of power and all legal. As the obligor he couldn't stop them from taking the house. As the obligee, they can not stop him from taking the note and all the other notes created by its use. By the way, no UCC1 will be used. Just simple contract and banking law. The Note belongs to the creator of it. obligor is the U.S. Citizen, obligee is the American. Two different and distinct poll positions. One the master, one the slave. This is why I tell everyone, learn contract and banking law.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Mike V. about using their definitions. Example of how blind that comment was: do you think our military intelligence, understands what weapons their enemies use? Do you think they share that info with our military? Do you think they are part of the enemy's military, because they have knowledge of what the enemy is doing? Really? I what to know what my enemy is doing, because then I know how to use their own weapons against them. I am becoming an expert on military intelligence and how to use their weapons. Why? because they use those weapons against us everyday. I am learning how to take those weapons and beat the crap out of them. Why? because I know and understand and am realizing our far superior our weapons of warfare are than their's! They are using sticks and stones to defeat a country, because the people in the country won't (like you) won't wake up to realize we have anti-aircraft missiles. The only problem is, we have so few people who understand how to use them. My goal, teach as many people as I can how to drone the crap out of them, lawfully and legally. You can do whatever you want! But, wisdom dictates you come to an understanding of the RULES OF THIS GAME, BEFORE YOU PERSONALLY GET YOURSELF HURT!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Mike here's something to think about: why do you think Hillary Clinton has not been arrested? Because a living soul (real man and women) are not subjects to US Laws. In the status of US Govt official, she was operating as a legal person. But, in legal, a person is a fiction, not a living soul (real man or woman). The only way they would be able to arrest her maybe is treason against the United States of America and that would be by military tribunal. But, what did she do that was an act of treason against America? All of her acts were acts of legal treason, as a legal person! She as a L.S. can not be charged for treason against the U.S. why? because the U.S. has no jurisdiction over her as a L.S.! Did she commit treason against the U.S.? In a mega way! The only way, anyone could attach themselves to her for her to stand trial is for the murder, she committed against individual people who died, because of her. Or if the American States of the Republic were fully re-established again, but even with that we would have to prove treason against America not the U.S. Hillary knows this, she's a yale lawyer. The U.S. is attached to the legal fiction...not to her as a living soul. She knows the fiction is not her and there's no way for them to prove it. The only way to get her L.S. caboose in jail, is the proving the child trafficking thing. That is an American Crime, because it caused injury and harm!All her crimes were in the status of a U.S. PERSON, not as an American, with the exception of the children and maybe Benghazi.

    ReplyDelete
  19. thoroughly enjoyed your back and forth Mike V and C. Johnson! I learned a lot as well. thank you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mrslaura keep studying on your own and learn and live free. You're welcome by the way, have a great day!Just remember, if you are in the USA. Anything with a US tag on it has authority and jurisdiction over you. Stay away for it! Let me take this a big, big step forward for you. Please really think about this and the implications of what I am just now going to say: The Constitution created the United States for America. That name: the United States for America has been misconstrued in all types of ways. All misconstructions are fraud (per Webster's). That name though (excluding the misconstructs-the frauds), was given within the context of the Constitution to identify the Nation of several States, united. It was the name given to the govt, that was formed by the Constitution.That name is the name of the govt-not the nation. The Constitution was for one purpose and one purpose only, forming a govt for and of the several States. Had nothing to do with the governing of the People. The governing of the People did not begin until the 14th amendment. The 14th amendment created a citizen. That citizen had never existed before then. That citizen was given a title: U.S. CITIZEN (person). That citizen did not include the People, the citizens of the several States. It only included those who were excluded from the first group of citizens. So now, instead of one group existing there are two. There are the PEOPLE of the several States and the PERSONS U.S. Citizens. The difference, read the 14th amendment. Who controls all U.S. Citizens? Who is excluded from making any laws for U.S. Citizens? Then ask yourself why do all the courts want to claim you as a U.S. CITIZEN? And if all the courts claim you or can get you to admit you are a U.S. CITIZEN, what does that mean for you? Go back to the driver's license and ask why are two, not one name on that license? Get it, understand it, get it in your core! Live free! Remember all power is in your signature, you give consent to be governed, as all mankind is created equal. Contract well!

      Delete
  20. Hey Laura, let me share this with you, you will like it, I believe. On the driver's license the name (identity-legal-misconstruct) is always on the top of the license and the signature of the real man and woman is on the bottom. want to know why? because that is the authority of the real man and woman to jurisdiction. because on the driver's license the signature stands UNDER THE LAW. The signature stands under the LEGAL PERSON, on the driver's license. Now, who has the power over the legal person? the system. How did the system get authority, by the signature standing under the legal person, who the govt has jurisdiction over. Get it? IT'S A TIER EFFECT! If you are going to have a driver's license, it is important to understand, that 'is you' operating in U.C.C. The only protection for you would then be found within the U.C.C. So, instead of STANDING UNDER THE LEGAL PERSON, why don't you STAND UNDER this, written above your signature: U.C.C. 1-308, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. with your signature standing under that, it put up your umbrella in the heavy rain storm. Everyone can decide to go out in the rain with or without an umbrella. What do you want to do? This is just an example of how things are done and why everything in legal has implications (implied contracts). How we decide to stand is up to us! You can stand under, over or with terms and conditions, etc! Anna has said she likes to use, 'RETIRED'. Do you get why retired is a great term and condition to use when she makes her contracts? Think about it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. C.Johnson, I tried similar umbrella when signing for my driver's licence here in Ontario and the signature was refused by the clerk. The "location" for the signature could contain ONLY the signature. So, while it may be a very legitimate offering, it depends upon the acceptance on the corporate side of the equation.

      Delete
  21. Dan, did you let the clerk get by with that? Remember, IF YOU KNOW THE TRUTH...you will be free! Knowing and doing is two different things. You can't do something, unless you know the reason why you are doing it. That is why I continue to stress...think. Now, let me tell you what actually happened between you and the clerk, so you can think in a different way. The clerk is an agent for who/what? Who is she instructed by? Who does she normally deal with? So she is instructed by the who/what, how how to deal with the majority of the whose! Get me? So, she did what she has been instructed to do! She made you an offer to be under the legal name and you accepted by signing it and not STANDING UNDER YOUR UMBRELLA. It was pouring rain and she told you, you couldn't use your umbrella and you obeyed her instructions, from her who/what above her. You complied as a U.S. Citizen, because you stood on her instructions from the who/what and not on your rights as a citizen. The reason being it wasn't in your core, that you could do it. See, this is the issue, we have been taught our entire lives, this lie: "WE MUST COMPLY!" That's a lie, straight from the pits of hell and has enslaved this country, in our minds. OK, caste down that vain imagination, kick it out. It is your duty and obligation to yourself and your country, to not comply with illegal or unlawful instructions. She was only giving you an instruction and it wasn't based on anything legal. You accepted her instruction as law. Why? What did the UCC SAY? can she override it? Can she make law? But, see she deals the majority of the time with US Citizens! She gave them the only answer they deserve: "you can't use that above your name"! I would have said: "OK SISTER, SHOW ME WHAT LAW BACKS UP YOUR INSTRUCTIONS, CAUSE I CAN SHOW YOU THE LAW THAT BACKS ME UP AND YOU ARE RIGHT NOW STANDING IN JEOPARDY OF USC 18-242, DO YOU WANT TO CONTINUE?" But, of course that's just me, you can do whatever you want! I mean I'm just saying! Have a blessed day Dan, live free! ps. about the space to write it, how small can you print to make sure you get U.C.C. 1-308 (above your name)and then keep writing all rights reserved. Can you print very tiny? I can! They don't want to give us space, but I can do it. I just right real small!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. C. Johnson - I understand to the core, exactly what you are saying. You missed an important point in the opening sentence. I am from Ontario and while I know business under incorporation operate in the UCC business contract law framework, I don't have an equivalent USC 18-242. Canadian construct is a tad different than the American-in general terms. Even our Canadian Constitutional lawyer, Rocco Galati has been unsuccessful at 33% of his cases against the Government on these very basic issues. Even though in those cases he is right, the bank accounts of his clients runs out faster than the banks and government coffers. At 70 and a limited pension, there is a point of deciding where my efforts lie. If I were single and 50, my story would be much different.

      Delete
  22. Dan, here's a story for you. So when I was learning this, I wrote the prosecutor and asked him what would happen if I didn't come to court. His reply: "'THE RULE' is: the judge will issue a bench warrant for your arrest, so it's mandatory for you to be in court!" Wait, hold up: RULE? What rule? where did that rule come from? Because rules have to be in compliance with law! So I wrote him back, no response. Now, keep in mind, I'm still trying to figure everything out. So, I went to court, but decided to spend a few minutes with him before court and ask him for the law that supports the rule. He said:"IT'S IN THE CONTRACT THAT WE CAN DO THIS!" (that's when I learned about contracts.) So I asked: WHAT CONTRACT? he said: the one between your state and mine. I said: did I sign the contract? he said: I don't know I am not a party to it. I said: I don't remember signing such a contract, is my name on it? He stands up from his desk and starts shuffling papers and says: its almost time for court, I gotta go and he starts heading out the door of his office. I say: doesn't the Constitution forbid states making contracts with each other? So he leaves and gets the heck away from me. My head is swimming. What the heck just happened? But, I knew I was onto something, didn't fully understand it, but I knew it was about jurisdiction. I knew I was somehow uncovering he had no jurisdiction. I don't know what ever happened, because I left, never heard anything from the court after 8 years. That one thing, helped me begin to put the pieces of this entire jurisdiction thing together. The things I am sharing are from real experiences I've had and how I truly got my education. It all began when I started questioning my own belief system. That's when I begin to see the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Dan, the U.C.C is INTERNATIONAL LAW. Not just US law. I am glad you get this to your core because that is where it needs to be. The point being: the woman gave you an INSTRUCTION, an INSTRUCTION is without authority or jurisdiction, unless there is legislative law to back it up. The LEGISLATIVE LAW, that counteracted her instructions was the U.C.C.! See, as of your last post, I can see you have some confuse of what law, rules and regulations actually are and when they are administering them to you. Their is the common law and the legislative law (acts of parliment). The common law is judge made law, from the bench. Its all the superior court decisions to which the inferior courts must comply.So bench law is the Supreme Law in our countries, legislative law is the inferior. Why? it is derived from delegated powers of the People. Common law is not delegated, it is the power of the People. Now, what we have in the courts is legislative law, administered by the flunkies, who couldn't make it within a real court of law. So they are administrators. This is the law you came in contact with, at that desk. You came into contact with legislative law. OK I'LL PLAY! Ms. so and so, you just gave me an instruction, where's the legislative law to back it up? Ms. so and so are you a legislator? Have you been elected to make laws for me a canadian citizen? I don't think so! Did I sign a contract with you, giving you personally authority over me? I don't think so! Ms. so in so, let me tell you this, international U.C.C gives me the right, privilege, benefit to write above my signature, 1-308 all rights reserved. Now, do you know of any law that stops this? NO! Ok done! We must hold the individual administrators accountable. Most of the problems you are ever going to have, is with the people like the clerk, who don't know their but from a hole in the ground. they only know what they are told, regardless of how wrong what they are told is. it is up to us to know the difference and administer the law, to them.
    Dan, here's a present for you: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1646&context=scholarly_works

    ReplyDelete
  24. Dan here't the colour of law statute for Canada https://www.courthouselibrary.ca/how-we-can-help/our-legal-knowledge-base/colour-right
    Ps. Ya'll need to learn how to spell color! LOL!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. C. Johnson Thank you for your assistance with the links, I will review them both. Yeah! Color/Colour depends on the dictionary used with the latter being English/Canadian. LOL!

      Delete
  25. Dan you are so welcome about the links. I hate this for you (lol), your colour of law is better than ours. I'm jeolous!

    ReplyDelete
  26. C. Johnson, I've been very impressed with all your comments; you are genuinely helpful and demonstrate true wisdom and compassion! We are fortunate to have you on this site for sure! I have an issue I'd like to bounce off that wonderful mind of yours. I have had the same "personal" bank account for 11 years. Since discovering the Great Fraud, I've been signing everything, "By: My Name, All Rights Reserved, UCC1-308". After a recent deposit I noticed on the receipt, "Deposits governed by terms on your signature card." So naturally I wanted to just look at what terms this adhesion contract was attempting to bind me with. I naturally asked to see my signature card. The manager came back with a printout for me to inspect. Things really started taking an interesting turn when I told him I needed to see the one with my original, wet-ink signature. I mean, that photocopied signature could have been a skillful forgery, after all, and knowing bankers must spend their spare time dreaming up increasingly inventive ways to defraud their customers, I was asking a legitimate question. His response was, "It isn't kept at this branch." I asked, "Well, where is it kept?" to which he replied, "I don't know." You could tell I was on to something just by the silence in the bank and his genuine discomfort. So I simply let the silence drag on for a bit and said, "Well, let's just fill out a new one then." That's when he came back with a new contract, which superficially looked the same as the alleged photocopy of the "original" except that he was reclassifying me as a "Tenant" on the account instead of an "Owner", and had removed my beneficiary off the account completely. Needless to say I had no intention of signing it, I was strictly on an information gathering mission, after all, and pointed out the changes. He was clearly not going to address my questions, and was visibly uncomfortable. So he makes a call to a "higher up", and comes back with some person in "personal accounts customer service" and tells me from now on I must deal with her. I told him I would consider it, and would be in touch, but kept both copies of the alleged "original" signature card as well as the "new", unsigned signature card they were attempting to disenfranchise me from my own account with. Unlawful conversion of assets? Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law? I don't know, but two weeks later I receive a letter from that branch informing me, for no reason given, that they could not continue to offer me services anymore, and the account would be closed in one week's time. I can't help but think this stems from my insistence of my God-given rights, except for the fact that I did recently try to deposit a check through the ATM, which was rejected, with "Special Deposit: Redeemed in Lawful Money persualt to 42 USC 411" above my regular reservation-of-rights endorsement. What are your insights into this case? I am seriously considering sending a registered demand letter informing them that it has come to my attention that fraud may have occurred on one or more of my accounts and I am exhausting my administrative remedy to determine the nature and scope of the breach and demand a forensic account analysis showing all persons, entities, corporations, ect that have an interest in the account and see how many times the "bank" has loaned me their "credit" over the years.. LOL Any advice or insight from you would be very much appreciated, especially if you might know how to set up a new, "private" account sans a SSN and denominated in USD, not FRN's as Anna has suggested? Thank you in advance!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Believer, here's the issue. You are trying to use U.C.C to overcome commercial transactions. And then you are trying to use U.S.C. as a sovereign. It can't be done. You will lose. Think of it this way: you have 3 identities, not one. OK? Get that! Let me explain who they are: 1.) your name before the birth certificate L.S. 2.) Your name on the birth certificate: natural person, d.b.a. private signatory, U.S. National 3.) ALL CAPS NAME (however its is spelled), U.S. CITIZEN ONLY. Acknowledge these three exist, but they are only IDENTITIES. Now, the 1st one exists completely outside of any law except the creator. the 2nd one exists outside U.C.C. but not outside other laws. the 3rd one exists within the U.C.C. Follow me? If so read my next comment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So when you opened a bank account, if you used any govt numbers other than a U.S. NATIONAL PASSPORT, then you for the purposes of the bank are U.S. CITIZEN and you have no rights, to real money. See your signature, matched that of a U.S. CITIZEN and they can't change that. Now, you are coming in claiming to be someone else, like the U.S. NATIONAL. They don't know the U.S. NATIONAL, because when when you signed the card, you were just a typical U.S. Citizen. Now, you are trying to change things and they have laws they have to follow and believe it or not they are trying to protect you and your rights as a U.S. CITIZEN. You have taken on a new understanding and now you are operating at a higher place and it is out of the norm for them. Most, of them only know procedures for the masses they don't know what to do with you, because you have become an exception and you are acting abnormally (out of the norm). So now, you have some choices to make: you have to decide who you want to be and then make choices in alignment with that one. But, be kind to the peasants along the way, they are only trying to do what they think is right for you, their customer. For certain, it sounds like they are trying to keep you from changing the account. most of the time its just they don't know the law and what you know. So the question for you is this: do you continue to try to go against the flow and keeping trying to change the account of the U.S.CITIZEN, or do you close it and reopen one as the U.S. National or the AMERICAN STATE NATIONAL? See if you open it as the American State National, you just need to get a U.S. National passport. Then you should be classified for their purposes as a non-resident alien. The only thing required is a passport and no other form of id. I mean you can do what you want, but in order to change your U.S. Citizen account, you must change the ID, get rid of the govt numbers and get a passport, anyway to eliminate the driver's license (which ID'S you as a U.S. Citizen). I just think you are swimming up hill against a river of paper. You are actually asking them, for legal purposes, to put an entirely new person on the account and to kill the other one. Well, how do they do that? I think that is what you are facing!Just when you work through you processes, remember they don't see you at all. They see persons. These persons are all different depending how the capital name is spelled. Each spelling of each name in capitals is a different legal person, another identity for you. If they do business with one, that doesn't mean they are doing business with the other one. Each transaction is different. Each time you change the way you sign your name or add something to it, they have to see it legally as another legal person. It sounds like they are trying to get you to sign another card, because when you changed your signature, they could let you continue to use the account, by your new signature, because you stopped being that legal person and went to a new one. I know this sounds nuts, but this is truly how the system works. If you can see this...lights will begin to come on. Did you see my comment about the names on the driver's licenses? You just have to understand, all the identities and how they see them and know each spelling or change to the names is another legal person. You think they are dealing with you, a man in front of them. They are not, they are dealing with legal identities of the man sitting in front of them. How they deal with these identities depends on which one you present for them to see and how you use that particular identity.

      Delete
    2. believer, I also wanted to tell you about the color of law USC 18-242. You can not use color of law, unless you know the specific law they are trying to change or if you know what they are telling you is not law. What I always do about color or law problems, is I tell them, here is what the law actually says or I ask them, what law backs up what they are saying. The issue for for people, they do neither of those things. They just accept "NO" and the instructions given and move on. Not, me! Now, I know, 90% of what we are instructed has absolutely no law to back it up. No law, then its just their opinion and that's when it's color of law. But, if you don't call them on it, you can't prove color of law. Once, you tell them the actual law or they fell to provide you the actual law, if they persist, it's color of law. Most the time when you call them on it, they back down without an issue. Heck with all the laws on the books, there's no way for them to get it right, anyway. It's just ridiculous, why we keep paying those crooks to make more laws to regulate our lives. It's stupidity on our parts. who the heck needs more laws?

      Delete
    3. C. Johnson, Thanks for the replies! You make valid points I had not considered. I'm just a student of all this process and I do make mistakes, but am diligently trying to study to show myself approved to Jesus for the redemption granted me and be in the world but not of it any more than necessary. I understood that the name on the account stylized JOHN H. DOE was a public transmitting utility, and that having liened it as such on a UCC1 financing statement, which the bank has on file, HE, the public transmitting utility is under the UCC but not me, the real man in full life. So in my logic, claiming a reservation of rights and UCC1-308 didn't seem in error. Perhaps I was wrong in my assessment. In any case, the only reason the bank wanted me to sign another signature card was because they could not produce the original contract for my inspection because I suspect they have long ago monetized and hypothecated it ten times over, and it no longer exists. I would like to think the bank personnel are just clueless doe eyed little bunnies, but anyone following this site long enough would have to heartily disagree. I mean, look at what Anna says about how neurotic these bankers lives are; I'm sure a constant state of fraud brings just rewards from God. I agree closing the account probably isn't a bad idea, I have been actively searching for ways to open one as a state national without having to go the passport direction. Can't we just put "retired" as Anna suggests or "retired, not in commerce" on our US Citizen passport and Driver's license ? What about a Non-Political, common law ID? I also wish to thank you for clearing up my misunderstandin of the color of law code, I will definitely add that to my administrative toolkit!

      Delete
    4. Believer the only reason I am into all this and understand so much, about it is because of the Lord's revelations and desire to free our human bodies from mystery babylon, while we dwell on the Earth. He is leading us out of the world (mystery babylon) and into his Kingdom by spirit. So I am with you on the thing about Jesus. He truly is doing this, as a means to set his people free. Just like the pharoah thing. Maybe you have read my comments about the UCC. If not, let me say them here; ALL-EVERYTHING IN THE UCC, IS COMMERCIAL, EVEN THE UCC-1. ALL UCC IS A TRAP, EVEN THE UCC ONE. ANYONE WHO USES UCC ANYTHING, IS A US CITIZEN. UCC IS COMMERCIAL SLAVERY. UCC IS HOW THEY LOCK UP THOSE WHO ARE LEGAL PERSONS. STAY OUT OF UCC, EVERY CHANCE YOU GET. MAKE CONTRACTS. Now, with that said, there are times we will need to use UCC. But, they should be far and few between. The thing about the UCC-1 and why I've never done it and don't want to do it, is this it's their form. They control it. I don't get to control it. See their form says, they have control. The form its self gives them control. That paper is their creative property, not mine. So if I am going to use their creative property, then I have to do things their way. I'm not about that..doing stuff their way. There's times, we have to do things their way on their forms, that's when I use the U.C.C. 1-308 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. I know when I am using their paper and signing their paper, I am agreeing to the legal person crappola. I know the rain of crap is going to come, so I use the remedy in U.C.C 1-308 to cover my backside from the beating. Then I know, they can't pull their regular crappola on me. If they try, then I U.S.C. 18-252 and U.S.C. TITLE 18 FRAUD. I have learned my identities and use them now very carefully. I use scrib a lot for forms. Then I research the words on the forms, so I understand them. Then I send them forth and I have been pretty successful. I had a judge tell me I was a very smart lady, then she leaned across her bench at me and whispered to me, where to go find more info. Pretty cool! So, I hope you can use some of the things I post and resolve some of the issues you have, we all have to come to the full knowledge of the truth, if we are going to be free. ps. the U.C.C. 1 you filled out, was still you trying to get covering from the U.C.C. it doesn't work that way. They know it and now you do too! The only thing you can do with the UCC is tell them where they are falling and then carrying them over to the USC.

      Delete
    5. PS. Sorry about the mistake in my above comment: it's not usc 18-252 it's 242.

      Delete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.