Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 4600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products.

Tuesday, June 11, 2019

Our Debt to Jailhouse Lawyers - Good News for "Criminals"


By Anna Von Reitz

This week I was approached to run for President of the United States. I had to explain that that was impossible and that the only office I could aspire to would be President of The United States of America, and that is an office I am too old and crotchety to do justice to.

So then I was asked if I knew people who are still Federal Citizens who could take up the torch and act as Third Party Candidates-- maybe scissor-kick the old Two Party System where it hurts. I scratched my head. I smiled.

I know some men who could do that and do a fine job, though they would not be likely to win because they are all Felons.

Every single one of them have run afoul of the Statutory Law and have educated themselves as lawyers while in prison. They are all fine men, all skilled lawyers as a result of their own miseries, and they are helping people all across this country--- Jailhouse Lawyers, one and all.

We all owe a great debt to them. They have done and continue to do service in the cause of actual justice, a job that the conventional attorneys have largely forgotten or willingly abandoned, if they ever held justice as a goal to begin with.

So many men and women have been unjustly jailed in this country that it is almost unavoidable and nearly a badge of honor to have a criminal record for infractions like resisting arrest and tax issues and refusal of licenses.

A little later in the day I got an email from a young Jailhouse Lawyer who is exceptionally gifted, and with it, good news for other living people who have been jailed and prosecuted by these foreign courts. To protect his identity and forego the likelihood that he will draw even more flak from his jailers than he is currently suffering-- I will wait until he is released to properly credit him, but be aware that this is the result of one man working tirelessly from a jail cell. This is what he discovered and what he shared with me and what he wants me to share with others:

Title 18 U.S.C. is a codification of authority granted under to Article IV section 3 clause 2 of The Constitution of the United States for lands purchased, which means Guam, Mariana Islands, and Virgin Islands, as identified in Title 18 U.S.C. Part 1 Chapter 1, Section 23 --"Courts of the United States defined".

These specialized District Courts are established under Title 28 U.S.C. Part 1, Chapter 5, Sections 81-131, and only have authority to handle Civil matters pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. Part IV, Chapter 85, Sections 130-169. The referenced sections provide a list of administrative duties.

Read that: these courts have no ability to try criminal matters at all, so put it all together and turn it all around (do the Hokey-Pokey) and what do you get?

(A) Virtually every criminal case they have adjudicated is void for lack of jurisdiction and lack of Due Process, and (B) they are simulating legal processes, which is clearly criminal activity [constructive fraud] and whenever it has involved fines or charges for incarceration fees charged to the Public Purse, it is organized crime and racketeering.

Hmmmm....

I think we have just sounded the death knell of the "Prisons for Profit Scheme" and mandated the end of the false charges and false imprisonment of millions of Americans who aren't from Guam, the Marianas, or the Virgin Islands.

This coming to light is especially helpful in view of our discovery that the IRS has moved its headquarters from Puerto Rico to the Marianas. Now we know why, and we also know where all the "Public Transmitting Utilities" --- the entities using our names in the form JOHN M DOE are being domiciled. These Municipal Corporations are being housed in the Marianas to bring them under the jurisdiction of these criminal District Courts, and only God knows what form of "law" is being practiced in the Marianas.

In Puerto Rico, where they domiciled our ESTATES doing business under names in the form JOHN MICHAEL DOE, we were being held accountable under the Spanish Law of the Inquisition.

Sweet.

Well, folks, this also appears to be a gross violation of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Municipal Constitution, which limits the activities of the Municipal United States Government to the District of Columbia.

Houston, Houston.... we have a problem here, Mr. President. A real, great, big, fat, stinking corruption problem. Corruption of the Municipal Government. Corruption of the Courts. Fraud, theft, and racketeering by these subcontracting commercial corporations on an unimaginable scale.

Here is the scheme in black and white to impersonate the American Employers, steal their identities, and move the resulting fictional doppelgangers offshore, so as to manipulate and subject THEM under foreign Territorial laws and enable the Territorial Courts of Guam, the Marianas, and the Virgin Islands to claim jurisdiction over people and property assets to which they have less than no justifiable claim.

Pope Francis, Queen Elizabeth, and President Trump --- we have figured out the whole scheme, top to bottom. We can cite chapter and verse, not only for the prior fraud against our estate interests, but the present fraud involving the PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITIES--- and it looks like we need to send a million volts up all of your Collective Entity knickers.

The Great Fraud is over. Done. There won't be a reboot.

Your continued unwillingness to face facts and deal with us all in an honest fashion, the continued efforts to install foreign "States of States" on our shores, the continued use of "substitute" PERSONS and attempt to conscript and subject us under whatever local law is adopted in the Marianas-- is all emblematic of continued Bad Faith.

I recently told my Readers that Stigmatics are bleeding and to expect "more idiocy on a half shell" -- and here we are.


----------------------------

See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

80 comments:

  1. Sounds like crucial legal threads have been identified. Can these threads be "pulled" to thereby start the great unraveling? .........
    -

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm thinking swift unravelling of the guillotine kind of justice!

      Delete
  2. Stigmatics are just another one of satan’s tricks to deceive the sheeple.
    Nowhere in Gods word is this mentioned as being a sign from HIM.

    The only sign given by God was Jonah.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Within the writings of the BIBLE, The Living Creator warns us to stay out of LEGAL FICTIONLAND, "PERSONHOOD". A MAXIM of Law is "Let those who wish to be deceived, be deceived." We have each gotten ourselves into this mess and have the responsibility to get ourselves out of "BABYLON".

    Thank you Anna for bringing forth the "law" governing these ACTORS and their Private Courts. I am having such an issue with young people when presenting knowledge concerning this Fraud. I'm told: "You can find anything online to support what you want to believe in". It takes a lot of work and time to look up the law.

    They never prosecute criminally, it's just a Grand Illusion. Every Crime is Commercial. "Prison for Hire", is debtors prison, with a Grand Show for the spectators and participants to be distracted from what is really going on.

    I also have a friend who has a badge of Honor "Arguing with Police" on his record. Many blessings go out to all those working to bring this fraud against mankind to light. Your own home can become a prison when you Fear your employees.

    Annie McShane
    On Delaware

    ReplyDelete
  4. Everyone you must absolutely add this:
    TRADE AND COMMERCE:
    15 U.S. Code § 7. “Person” or “persons” defined
    U.S. Code
    Notes
    Authorities (CFR)
    prev | next
    The word “person”, or “persons”, wherever used in sections 1 to 7 of this title shall be deemed to "INCLUDE" corporations and associations existing under or authorized by the laws of either the United States, the laws of any of the Territories, the laws of any State, or the laws of any foreign country.
    (July 2, 1890, ch. 647, § 8, 26 Stat. 210.)

    Do you know what the LEGAL TERM, 'INCLUDE' means: contains within.

    SO, within the LEGAL TERM, PERSON, it must contain within the definition a corporation or association. But, please let us not stop there.

    Do you know that all U.S. CORPORATIONS and ASSOCIATIONS must be REGISTERED with SECRETARIES OF STATE? Do you know, that all legal name of legal persons, must include that registered u.s. corporation and/or association?

    WHERE THE FREAK, ARE THOSE REGISTERED CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS? ALL U.S. CITIZENS/PERSONS ARE THOSE CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS, ITS RIGHT THERE IN THE LAW.

    Every time you claim you are a U.S. CITIZEN, you claim you are U.S. PERSON as a corporation or association.

    Here: read for yourself https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/7

    IRS 7701 DEFINES PERSONS THE SAME WAY.

    Why don't you ask the IRS....WHERE'S THE FREAKING CORPORATION PURSUANT TO IRS 7701?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice Finds, but--

      "Every time you claim you are a U.S. CITIZEN, you claim you are U.S. PERSON as a corporation or association."
      -- Who the heck is this "you" person? How does you claim you is a U.S. CITIZEN?

      Delete
    2. Big Blue: whenever you check the 'ARE YOU A U.S. CITIZEN BOX: YES'
      and whenever you don't ask the enforcers for proof of the CORPORATION as is RESIDENCED, in the juridictional territory of the enforcer! ALL CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS conducting business with the U.S. must be registered with the SEC. OF STATE. This is law:in fact.
      So, let me ask you personally, how did they get jurisdiction over you a private man?

      Delete
    3. "you", "you", "you" : are you a girl or a cowed married man who has taken on the flavor of the v-jay.jay you married?
      ** everything is personal with you there Dorthy C. Johnson, do you want to talk about your "feelings", and do you "think" everything is about you and did god die with his fist up your ass ?
      ** The SOY is STRONG with THIS ONE
      lol

      Delete
    4. ps. You is an excellent word! as it is not me, checking the box YES! AND WHO IS Dorthy C. Johnson? Don't like the word you? don't ask ME questions!

      Delete
  5. ps. You have a right to use your PRIVATE NAME. Where is the corporation known as JOHN JIM DOE or DOE, JOHN JIM? Do these corporations have a RESIDENT in any State of the nation? Are they residenced anywhere in your house? Are they in the attic, the basement, the back yard, the kitchen, the bedroom, where are they? Are they anywhere in your county or state? Does the SECRETARY OF STATE have them recorded as doing BUSINESS OR TRADE in the STATE OF? Where are these things called PERSONS [corporations/associations] conducting PUBLIC BUSINESS OR TRADE BY LICENSES FROM THE SEC. OF STATE OF STATES? Are you trying to tell you, you do not have that license for PUBLIC BUSINESS OR TRADE? OOPS! Houston we have a problem, because these PRIVATE PEOPLE, have not PUBLICLY REGISTERED with the SEC. OF STATE, as ALL PUBLIC CORPORATIONS AND ASSOCIATIONS ARE REQUIRED, BY U.S. LAW TO DO!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The JOHN JIM DOE is registered with the US Post Office, as a Franchise.

      Delete

  6. IRS.hiding out side of our jurisdiction . Using foreign law on state nationals .running a illegal business in our names .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bubbapatric, balogna! They are not running illegal anything in your name. Your name has NEVER been associated with anything they have done. I would love for you to show me, any bank statement, summons, ticket or IRS statement, you have ever received in your name. Just show me one! Impossible, because you have never and will never receive one from them.
      You want to know the real issue and truth? You don't know your own name! Nor, do you comprehend you have a right to it and right to use it and that it is not the corporate names, to which they allege is your name.
      Crime-a-nee, go figure out what your real and true name is and then come back and post here.
      ps. I, a private woman, with only one name. That name is my christian/family name and it is not incorporated and I don't spell it with all caps or with the last name first. Any mail I receive not using my name, is immediately returned to sender, with a letter noticing U.S. 18 SECTION 1341.
      I absolutely refuse to allow them to use their made up, fictitious names against me and I don't care who they are. ITS FRAUD! GET IT?
      I only have one name, my parents gave me and I refuse to allow the U.S. CORPORATION to claim otherwise! I have an unalienable right to my name and all the rights associated with it.
      They are not doing anything illegal to me, because I stop them at the gate!I know my own name, dat gum it!

      Delete
  7. And now that they all know that the IS transferred all its "persons" to the
    Marianas, what are the chances of them having a hurricane just happen to destroy that island too...!!

    You guys still don't get it...the IRS will never play with "clean hands" or in "good faith"...!! The law doesn't mean anything to them...!! Your bringing a knife to a gun fight...!!
    John McAfee, the inventor of the security app for computers has something like 4 terabytes of info on the IRS and they are doing everything possible to charge him with murder just so they can extradict him from the Bahamas where there is no taxes, and once they get him here they will drop the murder charge and follow through with tax indictment...!!
    Does this sound like an agency that wants to come to the table in "good faith"...!!??? Anna, if you ever encounter a rapist, why don't you try talking to him diplomatically and let us know how that works out for you...??? Lol.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James there are times when you don't seem to let the facts get in the way of your opinion. It seems like there isn't a lot of linkage between what Anna writes, and how you process and respond. Not saying there is an underlying agenda there.

      For example, your declaration of independence idea. What you have proposed in past seems to leave the same people in charge even though though remedy has been exercised to extract oneself from the beast. You have called on Anna to insist that the IRS be abolished and I admit I have suggested that you are dangerously close to inciting violence. Now you know that Anna recently covered that recently and warned specifically against anything that can be interpreted as insurrection.

      Because they have lots of weapons and are probably dying to use them on somebody. It just takes a match, and we know that they will use false flags to encourage violence to give themselves an opportunity to act.

      This whole process is a minefield because of prior claims. And unless someone can show evidence otherwise, the elephant in the room appears to be Unum Sanctum as the grandest of all claims. Anna has defended it in past and that is a source of confusion for me because even though she is calling out the Vatican and the Popes and the church, I am not aware of anyone other than Anna who thinks that Unum Sanctum was intended for anything benevolent.

      I am surely not a scholar in this area but I can read the opinions of people who might be, and it sounds like this is the claim, along with the subsequent bulls establishing cesti que trusts, and other express trusts is a great deal of what is causing a big chunk of our problems on this planet, because it affects the whole world. That is HOW it was claimed. And that is how it is playing out. If this was intended to be a free will planet, no such claims of ownership should have been declared, nor can they be defended.

      This is bigger than abolishing the IRS, the tip of the iceberg you see is just the start of a much bigger mess under the surface, it is an apt analogy.

      Delete
  8. "scissor-kick the old Two Party System where it hurts"

    Why not "Grab the old Two Party System where it stinks"; or,
    "Hit them 'Hooker Ass Punch' style [to save face]"; or,
    "Bitch-Slap them, so we don't have to tell them twice"
    [ya know equal rights, equal pay, (not equal accountability though apparently)]

    Allusion to the violent act unique to the male gender? Really?
    -- might explain this statistic, however:

    71% of Children Killed by One Parent are Killed by Their Mothers; 60% of Victims are Boys
    http://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php

    ReplyDelete
  9. Let me tell you what all IRS AGENTS ARE AFRAID OF: U.S. TITLE 18-1001, 242, 241, 96, 1341 for violation of names by misrepresentation, concealments and schemes pursuant to U.S TITLE 1 SECTION 1, U.S. TITLE 15 SECTION 7, U.S.TITLE 26 SECTION 7701[IRS 7701], U.S. TITLE 28 SECTION 3002 AND U.S. TITLE 42 [CODIFIED ACT OF 1871].
    ALL U.S. PERSONS FOR THE PURPOSES OF TRADE AND/OR COMMERCE MUST INCLUDE: CORPORATIONS AND/OR ASSOCIATIONS ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE U.S. THAT MEANS THEY MUST BE REGISTERED WITH THE SEC. OF STATE.
    Want to cause fear and trembling? Ask for the proof of that registered corporation bearing the LEGAL NAME, that is assigned to you, as the corporation would be registered by SEC. OF STATE.

    You want to know, why most uneducated and misinformed people, never get results from anything they attempt? Its because they want to cry about injustices and they don't want to learn law:in fact and use that law:in fact, to free themselves from all the crappola.

    Learn law and then go demand proof of claim, pursuant to that law and let's see if you get results or not! Ask the right questions and light a fire of response.

    Ignorance of the law, is for cry babies and whiners!

    This maxim of law, is used in court, every single day:
    "LET HIM WHO WILL BE DECEIVED, BE DECEIVED!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. C.Johnson, that is helpful information I will look up your references, but...

      You said:

      "Ask for the proof of that registered corporation bearing the LEGAL NAME, that is assigned to you, as the corporation would be registered by SEC. OF STATE."

      I am just a bit confused by that statement, are you referring to the BC as proof of the registered corporation, I am not quite catching your meaning there? It's end of day and I am not firing on all brain cells LOL.

      Delete
    2. Will, you have been assigned names, many of them. The banks, the IRS, SS, Motor vehicles. They have all ASSIGNED names AND YOU ARE THE ASSIGNEE. They have ASSIGNED you a NAME [MANY IN FACT]for you to use in their system. That assigned name is the name of a corporation or association. Is that assigned name [however it came into your life] your name? Or is it the name of a FICTITIOUS CORPORATION?
      What is your real name? Do you know what it is and how it is spelled? If you know your own name, why are you allowing them to ASSIGN you a name? Are you really a corporation or association? Do they have proof of it? That name is directly linked to whatever corporation or association to which you are being claimed to be!
      Don't you get it, yet?
      Will, you, the man, was given a name by your parents! Why have you not stood up, in defense of that name and the right to use it and all the rights associated with it.
      That corporation or association name, has no rights attached to it at all. They told you, you have to use the name that was assigned to you and that you have to be their assignee. But, do you? Do you have to SURRENDER YOUR NAME, for their benefit privileges? Your name carries all the rights of the man. If you surrender your name, you surrender your rights.Your name and your rights are directly attached to each other.
      WILL, THINK! Did you ever, tell them they had the right to change your name into an all capital name or with the last name first [a corporation/association name] for their purposes of regulating you.
      Do you not see, every time you get a license or registration or anything else they offer and they change your name by spelling it differently than you spell it, they have caused your to surrender your lawful and official name, for a lie and to waive all your rights at the same time?
      But, Will, you have the right to your name. They don't own it. They can't take it, but you can waive your rights to it and willingly exchange it for the name they assign to you.
      Can you not see, everything is a name exchange?
      If there is a corporation and/or association with that LEGAL NAME, it must be registered by U.S. LAW, with the SEC. OF STATE. That is U.S. LAW:IN FACT! Ok, fine! Then where is that registration? Where is that corporation or association? Do they have the registration, showing you exchanged your name for the name of a corporation? WHERE IS THE PROOF OF SAID EXCHANGE? Does the sec. of state, have it on record, in that office? If not, then what proof do they have that you waived your name and the rights associated with your private name? Do you not comprehend, it is all assumptions and presumptions, but we have the right to challenge their jurisdiction and that the burden of proof is on them, to prove their claim by evidence and witnesses? WHERE IS THE REGISTERED CORPORATION/ASSOCIATION? Can anyone show me, where it is?

      Delete
    3. C.Johnson, thanks very much, you did clarify what you meant and them some. I do get it, I do know it is a name exchange I have been at this for a long time. Like many I am scouring the internet for understanding. If not for the internet who would have known this? They surely are kicking themselves for letting the slaves learn enough to finance their own freedom in terms of knowledge. I get that when they say SEC. OF STATE is responsible for foreign affairs, they mean the persons that they administer the registrations for.

      I know enough to know that quietly they mock us for not even knowing what our names are, or being educated enough to know that the upper case DOG LATIN isn't a correct name style. That gives rise to the claim that we aren't competent if we don't even know our names, and that is one of the ways they claim right of lordship over us and that essentially we are idiots.

      But...they educated the vast majority of us to know as little as required. I have heard that 200 years ago it was common to have a bible and a law dictionary and study both. It's an ugly bit of business, but thanks again. And yes James is looking like a shill, he is leading things in a specific direction, goading and nudging things along and thinking that nobody notices. We notice...

      Delete
    4. One more thing this is an obvious one but you hear about people asking to enter their names properly into official computers only to be told that the computer automatically converts the name to upper case. The people behind the computers don't know any different, well I guess some do if they are awake and looking for information about the reality that we find ourselves navigating in.

      Delete
    5. Will, here is a very important and power maxim of law, used daily in courts: SILENCE IS FRAUD AND AGREEMENT.
      If you remain silent and do not object and get your objection on and for the record, you have no defense, when they take your private name away from you.
      Your silence is contract...IMPLIED! You by your silence are telling them its ok for them to assume and presume jurisdiction over you. If you allow them to do it, without your object, then you have nothing to complain about, you agreed.
      It is this, plain and simple: SPEAK NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE!
      I just helped a woman, who was summoned to court, by use of corporate name. When we called out the plaintiff and attorneys for misrepresent and asked for proof of the corporation. They within hours of receiving the demand for discovery of proof of their claim, withdrew it and requested the court to dismiss. The woman never had to go to court. We know all this happened within hours of their receipt, because we tracked its receipt on usps and by time stamp of their request for dismissal at the court.
      It is plain and simple; us.title 15 section 7 states; A PERSON FOR THE PURPOSES OF TRADE AND COMMERCE INCLUDES [CONTAINS WITHIN] A CORPORATION or ASSOCIATION.
      If no corporation and/or association exists, then where did they get a corporate name, to summons you to court? See they have to file a complaint to the court. then the court uses that complaint to summons you. But, neither the complaint or the summons, has your name, it has a corporate name. OOPS! The law requires they name the official defendant. In other words, they cannot use walmart's name to call you to court. DUH!So what are they actually claiming: they are claiming a corporation exists somewhere at your home address and is residenced there. OK FINE! But, is that residenced corporation REGISTERED at the SEC. OF STATES OFFICE? I mean they are making the claim, right? So where is the proof of claim or are they attempting to commit fraud upon the court and get the judge to commit fraud with them and the bailiff and the clerk of court? Really?
      LAW:IN FACT, when used, to call them on their schemes, stops them in their tracks.
      Do you know fraud upon the court, is grounds for disbarment? Do you know, how simple it is to prove fraud, when you ask for the registered corporation and they have to admit, the name is fictitious and no such registration exists?
      I mean this is not methods, like so many gurus, want to teach people. This is law! Anything I have shared on this blog post is law:in fact. Just be law abiding and learn law and use it and watch what happens. When you use law, you are not violating it. right?
      Burden of proof? OK FINE! Where is the proof of claim, that gave them jurisdiction over you? I have asked that thing, so many times on this blogsite...how did they get jurisdiction. You know, I have yet to get a response!
      People do not know how they got jurisdiction. Isn't that nuts? I mean for me, if they claim they have jurisdiction, I want to know how and have a right to get that discovery question answered. I mean, do you follow me?
      I mean without knowing how they got jurisdiction, how do I even know if I am getting due process, equal protection, a fair trial, a fair judiciary, a trial in a lawful jurisdiction! Those are my rights and they all hinge on knowing how they got jurisdiction, so I must find out, if I am to protect my rights against infringement.
      See, these are the things I know, and I try to teach to everyone who has eyes to see and ears to hear. I try to teach it, but some people on this blog are babies, still in need of the milk. I hope will you enjoy this steak.

      Delete
    6. Ps. Will, how do you like your steak, rare or well done and would you like some steak sauce with it. Savor every bite Will and live free!

      Delete
  10. The IRS wasn't set up to be afraid of anything or anyone....Name me one agent or anyone else in that agency that has ever gone to jail for fraud...!!

    Just one...!! Even Trump couldn't charge the commissioner with that....all he did was put so much pressure on him that he "resigned"...and that was the end of it...!!

    Even if we were somehow able to correct our mess here, how will that help the rest of the world......???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because as Anna also said recently...All roads appear to lead to Rome. Well and now apparently Spain, which I have heard recently not sure where.

      James, so who are you recommending that the world declare independence FROM? Originally it was the King of the world, but who do you now reckon to be causing the problem? And I don't think the IRS qualifies, they are a just a symptom not the problem.

      Delete
    2. James, you absolutely are a shill or troll or just a mega squalling cry baby. You don't know jack crap. That is why you continue to cry like a little baby.

      Delete
    3. James it doesn't take long to search and find examples of people that were silenced by the IRS for discovering the truth and becoming whistle-blowers to disseminate the truth about the IRS.

      Delete
    4. c.j he probably gets paid for all this time wasting disinfo controlled op garbage ; he's been on here spouting off crap way too long . these shills are all the same !

      Delete
    5. lut, he definitely has some extreme motivation.

      Delete
  11. C Johnson....you have never stepped in a courtroom in your entire life have you....!! You have plenty advice for people but your nothing but an armchair general, far away from the battlefield...!! You aren't near battlehardened as you prevent to be...!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Pretend to be, is what I meant...!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. James, your ignorance continues to show:
    1.) have no idea about my being in court
    2.) why would anyone who knows the truth and knows how to use it, be in court? Hello?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. these shills that behave like little kids thinking we are going to buy into their bs; not smart

      Delete
    2. lut, he pretends to be on the side of the white hats, but all his comments are a means to destroy the white hats. He's a fraud!

      Delete
    3. James, you appear to be cherry picking the issues you want to address, like exactly who do you wish to declare independence from? That is germane to what would otherwise be considered sedition or insurrection. This is why you are being called out as a shill. If you ARE then you should be ashamed of yourself, you are very transparent, and if you are NOT then you need to work on your communication skills. You might start with not punctuating the end of every sentence with your trademark ....!! because not every word you utter is an emergency. Where's the fire?

      Delete
  14. We the Living, get Declaratory Judgments. We can write affidavits, THEY cannot. DJ's settle controversies on rights title and interest.


    Declaratory Judgment Actions: When are they Appropriate?
    https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1187&context=naalj


    http://www.uniformlaws.org/shared/docs/declatory%20judgments/udja%201922.pdf

    The purpose of the Act and its effect is to enable the citizen to procure from a court guidance which will keep him out of trouble and to procure that guidance with materially less expense than he would have to incur if he should wait until the trouble came before having recourse to the court



    In order to have recourse to and take advantage of the Declaratory Judgment procedure it is not requisite that any wrong should have been done or any breach committed. It is to prevent and forestall such happenings by a Declaratory Judgment setting forth rights and duties for the guidance of those concerned and indicating the course to be followed, that a remedy is provided by the Act, and thus litigation is avoided.


    “This act is declared to be remedial; its purpose it to settle and to afford relief from uncertainty and insecurity with respect to rights, status, and other legal relations; and is to be liberally construed and administered.”



    If before injury has been inflicted, the parties could obtain a decision on questions in dispute, much of the undesirable features of present day litigation might be eliminated.



    FS 120.565 Declaratory statement by agencies.—
    (1) Any substantially affected person may seek a declaratory statement regarding an agency’s opinion as to the applicability of a statutory provision, or of any rule or order of the agency, as it applies to the petitioner’s particular set of circumstances.
    (2) The petition seeking a declaratory statement shall state with particularity the petitioner’s set of circumstances and shall specify the statutory provision, rule, or order that the petitioner believes may apply to the set of circumstances.
    (3) The agency shall give notice of the filing of each petition in the next available issue of the Florida Administrative Register and transmit copies of each petition to the committee. The agency shall issue a declaratory statement or deny the petition within 90 days after the filing of the petition. The declaratory statement or denial of the petition shall be noticed in the next available issue of the Florida Administrative Register. Agency disposition of petitions shall be final agency action.

    https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/epch1202.pdf

    Declaratory Judgment Actions: When are they Appropriate?
    by Neal F. Weinrich, Esq.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Big Blue Ocean, there are so many things we can do and they are effective. But, it all centers on this: you must fully comprehend your own name and the rights associated with that name and stop accepting the position of ASSIGNEE of any GOVERNMENT ISSUED ASSIGNED NAME.

      Delete
    2. And what first hand knowledge dose your cuck-ass have about anything ex. rel. my standing with Probate Court recognized capacity Attorney-in-Fact for the NAMED Franchise Estate? .... that's right NADA
      But does a girl like you know,, Answer: EVERYTHING - of course,

      Delete
    3. BIG BLUE OCEAN, FIRST OFF: DECLARATORY JUDGEMENTS WILL WORK IN ANY COURT.
      It is a standard procedure. You missed the point entirely. As and I hope no one else does. The TAX COURT, has its own procedures. Read the PDF...YOU POSTED, NOT ME.
      It is not the same procedures as the U.S. federal courts. In that court you are stripped of all your rights, to introduce law:in fact. Law: in fact, is where your rights are secured.
      Can you use DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT in that court....YES YOU CAN! But, if you are an American National why are you in that court, required to play by their rules. THINK, BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY BY YOUR INFANTILE COMMENT, YOU ARE NOT THINKING.
      If you want to use DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT, what not in a court, where you can sustain your rights? THE COURTS OF ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.
      You stand to lose, anything and everything you bring into a court, that has absolutely no jurisdiction over you and where you can't use law:in fact, you have to in their jurisdiction rely on whatever they decide is law, based upon their administrative procedures.

      By the way, MR. ATTORNEY IN FACT, IN EQUITY, Common law, is the supreme law of the land. You can only use it as a man or woman with unalienable rights, which suspend all equity laws and rules and by their courts and their legislative acts.
      So let's see what is a better standing to be in: a subject of their courts or the sovereign of their courts?
      so take you ex. rel and your attorney in fact of the named franchise and well you know where to put it.

      Delete
  15. For everyone fighting the IRS, in THE IRS TAX COURT. If you are attempting to get justice in a U.S. INC. tax court you obviously have not read ARTICLE 3 SECT 2 nor have you read: U.S. 28-3002. The UNITED STATES, INC. tax court is the MUNICIPAL, non-federal tax court, pursuant to U.S. 28-3002. It is a separate and distinct court, from the courts of original jurisdiction. If you are in that court, you are claiming to be a U.S. PERSON. You have no right, duty or obligation to be in that court. That court has nothing to do with American State Nationals. It is strictly for DC municipal and territorial citizens. Why are you there? Your private name, cannot be summoned to that court, because it has no jurisdiction over your private name. It is your duty, to challenge jurisdiction, on and for the record, if action is brought against you in that court. WHERE IS THE CORPORATION OR ASSOCIATION, THAT MUST BE REGISTERED PURSUANT TO U.S. LAW, in order for the name of that corporation/association to be summons to it?
    It is your duty, obligation and responsibility to act to get that case, into the court of original jurisdiction. As a national, you are not a U.S. PERSON. That court can only hear cases involving U.S. PERSONS. Why are you in that court? You are a foreigner to that court! All cases involving foreigners [opposing parties of different nations] must be heard in a U.S. COURT, not the UNITED STATES, INC. court.
    UNITED STATES, INC. COURT, has an entirely difference set of rules and procedures than federal court. The U.S. INC. court, sets its own rules and procedures.
    You have a right to sue and be sued in a court of original jurisdiction, if you don't challenge jurisdiction on and for the record, then no wonder you lose in the U.S., INC TAX COURT. You don't even know your right to a fair trial, in a court of lawful jurisdiction. What are you doing? This is law, learn it and live free!And don't let shill and trolls tell you otherwise!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PS. To big blue ocean, I looked at the pdf you posted. Wanted to throw up, after reading it and here's why. It lays out all the ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, made up by and for UNITED STATES, INC. TAX COURT, for how it conducts its business and how it expects others to conduct business with it. It will not allow law:in fact to be used within its self. Because if it allowed law:in fact, it would be out of business very shortly.
      But, because it is a municipal and territorial court, it can do anything it wants over persons within and UNDER its jurisdiction.
      Do not, learn those procedures. Its garbage. Throw that crap out, with your next trash bag.
      Learn law and your rights and refuse to surrender jurisdiction to that thing, that calls its self a court. You have a right to original jurisdiction and the laws of The United States of America [1789]. You do not need to learn the ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES for a court, which has no jurisdiction over you, an America State, National! Learn law and live free!

      Delete
    2. Done the Petition Kit, go the revocation of severe delinquency
      And your thoughts on what THEY publish about the Declaratory Judgement Act - I don't give a sh*t what a cuck-assed f*gg*t mangina like you "thinks"
      I have orders issued from a Declaratory Judgement.
      But go ahead and feel right about being wrong, there Dorthy

      Delete
  16. C Johnson. ..so you don't want to fight in court, and you don't want people carrying guns, but you want freedom....you are totally useless...!!
    Why not just pray about everything..!!

    There is a new way to fight now ....common law arbitration courts...!!
    Google it..!!

    And Johnson you don't know anything about me at all....so stop assuming anything...!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Big Blue Ocean...dont try and educate C Johnson because she knows it all already....!! And Will Smith I want Independance from people like you..!!
    I will never obey your "jural assembles"....NEVER!! THE LAST THING I WANT IS MORE OF THE SAME GOVT IN A DIFFERENT NAME...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James, you again are absolutely showing your IGNORANCE!!!! I don't want anyone to go to court. Why should they? So, unlike you, I use the law to help them stay out of it. I work with them to get dismissals, before the court date. But, because of your ignorance, you would know nothing about that, because you don't know jack about the law:in fact. The only ones who go to court as summoned, how those who don't know law: in fact. OH THAT'S YOU RIGHT? OOPS!!! You are a crying baby in need of your momma's teet. waa waa waa!
      Oh and about the guns, I have several of them. Again, you don't know jack! Go run home to momma, you putz, so she can feed her little baby.

      Delete
    2. +James Pansini: From People Like "YOU" Who?
      What Jural Assembles?
      BTW: I already have Declaratory Judgments under my belt, based on paperwork only with an order from the court in my favor
      ** that is, if the "YOU" you mean Big Blue Ocean, that is..

      Delete
  18. Hey miss know it all....what court is the court of original jurisdiction...you never told him...???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually its the federal courts. BUT HERE, since you don't know law, read it: THE JUDICIAL POWER OF THE UNITED STATES.

      The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;— to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

      Oh and about the know it all thing, I prove it again and again and I don't need my diaper changed ever!

      Delete
    2. Ps. James why didn't you bring up original jurisdiction and tell anyone how to use it against the IRS? Oh I forgot, you don't know law, you only know how to complain and no nothing about how to stop the big bad wolf, from stealing your milk bottle.

      Delete
    3. ps. James, Marbury vs. Madison is the court case that supports this, as is also referenced in Crank vs. U.S. and is also the 11th Amendment. Just thought I would show off a little bit more for your sake!

      Delete
    4. PS. James, I no longer wonder why you continue to lose, even your diaper in court, because it is apparent you don't know squat!

      Delete
    5. ps. James and oh let me not forget the JUDICIARY ACT OF 1789, WHEN A STATE, AMBASSADOR OR PUBLIC MINISTER IS INVOLVED: the SUPREME COURT IS THE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. Sorry, I didn't express that earlier, because I wasn't teaching any STATE, AMBASSADOR OR PUBLIC MINISTER on this forum, that I know of:

      The Supreme Court shall have [original] jurisdiction over all cases of a civil nature where a state is a party, ... And shall have exclusively all such jurisdiction of suits or proceedings against ambassadors, or other public ministers, .... And the trial of issues in fact ... shall be by jury. The Supreme Court shall also have appellate jurisdiction from the circuit courts and courts of the several states, in the cases herein after specially provided for; and shall have power to issue ... writs of mandamus, in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed, or persons holding office, under the authority of the United States.

      PUNTZ!

      Delete
  19. C Johnson....when is the last time you got layed...its time....lol.!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James, about your comment, thank you for confirming your brain is not located between your eyes. I had a thought it was located elsewhere, so thank you for that confirmation.

      Delete
    2. sorry meant 'BEHIND YOUR EYES"

      Delete
  20. C Johnson....all that rhetoric and you still didn't name the court of original jurisdiction.....idiot...!!

    Let me help you...it the united states District Court....the court of original jurisdiction....not the DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ps. James, is the SUPREME COURT A DISTRICT COURT? Are district courts, federal U.S COURTS? Do both the SUPREME COURT, APPEALS COURTS AND DISTRICT COURTS ALL FOR ORIGINAL JURISDICTION? Are not all these courts U.S. COURTS? Isn't it true they all have original jurisdiction over certain cases, based on the parties in the actions? So no James, you lose and your answer as stated above is wrong! You don't know squat! The district courts are not the only courts with original jurisdiction. PUTZ!

      Delete
  21. Big Blue Ocean....you hit the nail on the head....!! Why doesn't Anna settle this....chime in anytime Anna...!!

    ReplyDelete
  22. C Johnson...when is the last time you tried to get into the supreme court...!! Centurori denied...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DO YOU READ ANYTHING????? OMG! I have already answered that question 3 times on this blog! Stop being a cry baby!

      Delete
    2. ps. James, why don't you at least learn something about equity from Big Blue? Because since you refuse to learn law, maybe he can help you with equity. Because He is absolutely right about DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS. Maybe next time you find yourself in court, because you don't know how to stay out of them, instead of the big bad wolves, stealing your diaper, you could use the info from Big Blue. But for certain, you don't know jack about Law and or equity. Oh and about Anna needing to settle anything. I agree with Big Blue about the DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT. So I guess the only thing Anna would need to settle is the argument you and I have about your ignorance of the law and your need to present yourself as a cry baby needing a bottle or diaper change. SHILL.

      Delete
  23. FOR EVERYONE WHO MIGHT BE CONFUSED BY THE POSTS ON THIS BLOG:
    I and Big Blue Ocean are not in dispute about the DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT PROCEDURE. That procedure is valid in all courts. It works! Big Blue has been obviously using it in EQUITY to win. I say to that: AWESOME! A win, is a win and proves that we can win, if we know what we are doing.

    But, the difference between him and I, is I am teaching, to men and women with rights unalienable how to stand as the sovereigns over the equity courts and to get free from them, prior to going to court.

    There are very few, if any people, who want to go to court and fight in EQUITY for a victory.

    Big Blue Ocean is talking about being the owner of the LEGAL NAME OF THE FRANCHISE, and standing in EQUITY, to defend against them taking the name.

    I am asking men and women, to take possession of your own name and not some FRANCHISE NAME, they made you the assignee of for their EQUITY purposes.

    When they use that EQUITY FRANCHISE NAME to summons you to court. They are assuming and presuming you have to prove they don't have jurisdiction of and over that name. They are by even using the name assuming and presuming, you are the name and they have the right to summons you to court, because they have jurisdiction over franchises.

    Truth by law:in fact, is they can assume and presume, until the moon turns to cheese, if you know your own name and know they have no jurisdiction over it and if they want to claim they have jurisdiction, the burden of proof is not on you, it is on them.

    In all EQUITY actions, they transfer the burden of proof to you, to prove they don't have jurisdiction. This puts you, in the defensive, losing position. This is the 'subject' position. It under the law position.

    In law, they can't transfer the burden of proof, because they have to prove they have jurisdiction on and for the record. This puts you in the winning, offense position. This is the 'sovereign' position. Above the law position.

    Your private name and using it, is superior in all actions to any position where you would agree to be a representative of any franchise. All franchises are U.S. PERSONS and subject to U.S. jurisdiction. To quote BIG BLUE "The JOHN JIM DOE is registered with the US Post Office, as a Franchise." He is right,it is a registered name of a U.S. INSTITUTION, so they have before summoning you, taken jurisdiction over that corporate name. They issued it to you for their purposes and you are claiming it, to be yours. Do you see the uphill battle, confronting you, when you claim you are the ATTORNEY-IN-FACT for it?

    Men and women, with private names are not subject to any of that or that jurisdiction. The only jurisdiction men and women are under is their creator. And if they want to claim jurisdiction over you, they must prove it, on and for the record. Its so much easier to win, when law:in fact, is on your side. There is no franchise name to overcome, by men and women. In Law:in fact, men and women are already free, they don't have to prove it, it is already on the books, we just have to use it. In EQUITY:in fact, you have to prove you are not the legal name, which they already have jurisdiction. It's an uphill battle, that most people lose!

    So, you decide, LAW OR EQUITY? You will be the one, to go or not to go to court and you will need to decide how you want to represent yourself to the court. The court does not decide that, you do by your actions.

    But, for certain, learn law or learn equity. But, live free! My motto is and will remain: "learn law and live free"!It's such a easy path to follow, because on it, your name is already free from jurisdiction.

    ReplyDelete
  24. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  25. C Johnson....let me guess...you have 3 chi wow wows and a coupe of cats and your house smells like a kennel...Am I right....!! It's always the littlest ones that bark the most like you...!!

    ReplyDelete
  26. One thing is for sure...if you ever get on a "jural assembly" here in Calif. I'm going to open carry a gun...!! I wonder how your law will work then....jerkoff...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL! California? Well, that explains a lot! LOL!

      Delete
  27. And for the record only now are you agreeing with Deep Blue Ocean C Johnson...but because of your annoying comments meant as bullets from an angry black woman he immediately gave it right back to you because obviously you didn't understand him the first time as his comments were not nice to you...!! You do belong in jail C Johnson....especially if I were a judge or even a cop....!! You need a lesson in life...!!
    Anna hasn't weighed in yet about our arguememt, so don't pretend to know her mind, thank you very much....why don't you just take over the site since you know so much and obviously have nothing but time on your hands...!!

    You just don't get it....so let me spell it out to your empty head ....THERE IS NO "RULE OF LAW" anywhere..!!
    In Calif they don't even want to put Trump on the ballot here for the next election...maybe he should listen to you about law...lol...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James you are such a little boy. I am agreeing with him because as I have said, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT IS RIGHT! Hello????

      Oh about rule of law, anyone who has access to my private blog, who is reading this comment can testify of this; because the court dismissal is on the my blog.

      The woman, who got her dismissal, because I taught her how to demand proof of claim against her private name. And I posted the dismissal and the motion to dismiss on my site, and she never had to go to court, she would empathically disagree with you.
      Oh and by the way, because we tracked the motion to dismiss to the attorneys, by USPS FOR THE TIME AND DATE IT ARRIVED and that it claimed several U.S.TITLE 18 STATUTES, we know within hours of their receipt of that that motion, at their offices, they were putting together a settlement offer. And were getting their motion to pull the action out of court, stamped by the clerk of the court.
      Amazing how the "NO, RULE OF LAW THING WORKED"! FYI, the woman, didn't have to go to court, because they had no proof of joinder with her private name by contract and we called them on the fraud!So the attorneys pulled it on behalf of the plaintiff. CHA-CHING!Oh and the settlement offer, that didn't happen either, because they don't have contract joinder to her private name. Oh and the complaint to the court, was in the legal name and the summons from the court was in the legal name. She was never named as a defendant so the court, had no personam jurisdiction. And because original jurisdiction and personam jurisdiction over an American National was challenged by the motion, and neither could be proven, fraud existed if the action continued against the woman. That is what we told the court and the attorneys. That's misconduct and grounds for disbarment. But, of course, you wouldn't know anything about that, now would you, 'MR. LET ME GO TO COURT AND GET MY BUTT KICKED AGAIN'?
      By the way, many followers of Anna are also followers of my blog! They know the truth, of what I just posted here! putz!

      I don't care who the PRESIDENT is, I rescinded my U.S. VOTER REGISTRATION. There is no America President in office. However, he sure beats the crap out of anything representing California, guess that's why the mass exodus!

      Delete
  28. C Johnson....thats right , it explains everything...!!
    Try your shit in this state and see how far you get...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James, I am currently working with 2 people in you state, on law issues. We are having success in that state, because LAW IS LAW, regardless of which state you are in or what the issue. And private names are private names, regardless of where you make your home. But, you wouldn't know anything about the law: in fact or private names, how to use them, now would you? putz!

      Delete
    2. ps. JAMES: Oh and about the angry black woman thing: well not really. My maternal grandmother was cherokee indian. My paternal grandmother was blackfoot indian. My paternal grandfather was a red hair irishman. my maternal grandfather was scottish/german. My brother did a dna and african blood line was found and that would make sense because the blackfoot people and cherokee, married african people. So even though my skin is ivory, and pale to say the least, I guess you could call me 'colored' as I have many colors of people in my family heritage. And I am not ashamed of any of it. Nor, am I prejudice against any. If I am angry, which I highly doubt, it's at WILLFUL INTENT OF stupidity and ignorance and you wear those to things very well.

      Delete
  29. C Johnson ....I don't know where you got the idea that I answer to my name but when I go to court, I ask the questions, not the judge...I recently helped a friend who married a elderly gentleman , 94 years old to be exact, who was going through hell , and locked up to a hospital bed for supposedly a "child abuse " case that the prosecutor wanted to make a name for herself as the oldest man ever to be convicted of that crime in Orance County...!! This all happened before I even knew or got involved with the case...!! He was basically buried by the system already by the time I got involved...! But when I found out what they were putting him through I got involved . All I had to do is show up one time, because it was a judge I had faced of before..!! Then I went to his PD in person, who wouldn't even come out to talk to me...!! He had a million dollar bond on him, and within a couple of days , someone had posted a $100,000 bond for him to get out (We still don't know who to this day), and the case against him was immediately dropped, all without ever going into court or filing ANY PAPERWORK at all..!! All they had to see is me showing up and the case was over and he was released...!! No paperwork..!! So don't tell me I don't know what I'm doing..!! That judge didn t want any part of me anymore after I kicked his butt the last time I saw him..!! It's better to have a reputation than to know what name to use...!! He didn t even want to go there...!! The case was over as soon as everyone knew I was involved....period...!! Dumb ass...!!
    I wonder if you could have gotten him out just by showing up?? No paperwork..!! All they have to know is you mean business...!! Let me know how all that paperwork and time gets you...I don't need any of it anymore, because I know there system better than they do...!! But nice try...!!!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Oh, I did I mention I did it all for free...!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yippee, now pat yourself on the back and stop being a cry baby!Oh by the way...did they give you keys to the jail and kiss you backside, too!

      Delete
  31. Dear Anna...you are a total piece of shot to let this nonsense of belittling everyone on a site that is supposed to help people with court knowledge and procedural law...!! No other patriot site allows this division except you...and don't hide behind Paul...!! It's your fault for not stepping in and clearing things up.....there is absolutely no excuse for your non- participation.....!! Your a coward ..!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James, then why don't you stop doing it?

      Delete
    2. You'e not a patriot James, why don't you get off this site?

      Delete
    3. From Anna:

      Of all the things I have been accused of, cowardice is not one of them!


      What on earth are you even blathering about now? Participation in what? Dismantling a corrupt court system? I don't know what you think you are doing, James, but that is certainly what I am doing and all I have asked you to do is get busy, do your paperwork to reclaim your own birthright for your own sake, and organize your State Assembly--again, for your own sakes.

      Delete
  32. As a matter of fact....YES THEY DID..!!

    ReplyDelete