By Anna Von Reitz
The Queen's Government is responding with a
propaganda campaign designed to "redefine" the Reconstruction --- an attempt to
rewrite history and contracts and treaties using film and a lot of lies and
prompted false assumptions to do it.
To answer this you need only observe: (1) the
contracts -- the actual Constitutions and Treaties the Queen and the Pope owed
us at the time of the Civil War; (2) the results --- they secretively took over
our government in gross Breach of Trust, usurped upon the States to create their
own foreign States of States on our soil and left us uninformed; (3) the fact
that the Reconstruction Acts have never been repealed; (4) the President is
still defined by his role as Commander-in-Chief and rules by Executive Order via
a military junta instead of working for us and our States of the Union.
These are evils which have been used to usurp and
commandeer our lawful government for many decades and represent inexcusable
fraud and Breach of Trust on the part of the Queen and the Pope, both.
You will soon be seeing a Ken Burn's style movie
about the Reconstruction on PBS. This was rushed forward as a propaganda effort,
to try to convince you that everything was completed and done correctly, go back
to sleep..... but I and our American researchers are here to tell you to wake up
and address the actual history ---- not another British Bunko version of history
like you were sold in Public School.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Hopefully, enough are awake to the British con game. They have lied to us before and will continue doing so until they are physically held to account. They are being exposed and will now do everything they can to convince the masses they are good guys. The problem is, the harder they try the more evident they expose themselves as deceitful fools.
ReplyDeleteFunny, my Dad emigrated from England to Canada when he was 16 in 1929 and during my latter high school years we got into a debate from his viewpoint of the Monarchy and Canadian government. I suggested at the time it was no better than Communism and he went off the deep end. What is the difference of being sub-servant to a Monarch or a Czar? Illusion or delusion I suspect.
Your last line: Great point!
ReplyDeleteThank-you for the heads-up Anna. i will bet that it is deceptively believable!
ReplyDeleteall mainstream media is full of half-truths/lies. ask/present "gov" people with law books, quotes from court cases, etc. and they all go stone silent.
ReplyDeletethis is likely less for misleading "you" and more for entrancing/putting to sleep everyone else, i.e. so that any "truth" you might happen to bring up or discover, most people will knee-jerk reject out of hand (with no sources ever of course)
same reason the "Gov" spreads aliens/ufos stories. so anyone stumbles on military aircraft, or something else that was supposed to be "secret", the first reaction of most people is "sure, with the little green martians, yup, uh-huh, yessireee bob"
"poisoning the well" "leading down the rabbit hole" -- it is all about distract/misdirection, to get people focussing away
the most effective way to lie IMO is 100% everything they say is "true" but irrelevant...they just leave other things out, not mentioned at all either "side".
Delete2nd most effective method, is perhaps 90% "Truth" and 10% "lies", slipping in little things and hope your guard is down.
it is pavlovian conditioning: either try to "Bridge" a falsehood with "credible" things (positive reinforcement, the other things person X says is true, this thing must be too)
Deleteor stick in "paranoia" with something legitimate to muddy the waters (negative conditioning/deinforcement, anyone who mentions topic X it is now associated with crazy conspiracy theory Y)