Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Monday, May 9, 2016

More Confusion About Common Law Courts --- Unanswered Letters 11 -- Reply to Sir David Andrew

by Anna Von Reitz

In keeping with the general ignorance about Common Law Courts, I got this one in my box today: 

"Today I have listen to Sir David Andrew talk with Angela Stark on talkshoe and he said that is VERY wrong to use term Common Law Courts because he said they do not exist. Nany People have been jaild by using tern Common Law Courts he said.

Instead we should use COURTS OF COMMON LAW." 

Not necessarily. 

Common Law Courts are courts operating on the land jurisdiction.  Courts of Common Law are operating on the jurisdiction of the sea ---- any time you see the word "of" you are talking about an incorporated, secondary entity operating in international jurisdiction.

Common Law Court = Land Jurisdiction = Ohio State

Courts of Common Law = Sea Jurisdiction = State(s) of Ohio

The reason "citizens of the United States" (that is, territories and District of Columbia) get in trouble when they try to operate "Common Law Courts" is that they only have access to "Courts of Common Law".  

We; who claim our State National political status under Article IV, Section 2 of the Federal Constitution, get in trouble if we try to operate "Courts of Common Law" because we only have access to "Common Law Courts". 

It depends, therefore, on the audience.  If Sir David is talking to a bunch of Puerto Ricans, he is exactly right.  If he is talking to Americans asserting their birthright status, he's 180 degrees wrong. 
See this article and over 200 others on Anna's website
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.