Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Monday, July 18, 2022

Montana Republicans uphold the inviolable right to life begins at conception

MT GOP PLATFORM Convention this weekend

PROLIFE MONTANA🕊❤🕊

I was blessed to attend the Montana GOP Platform Convention this weekend. Republicans stood firm in upholding protection of innocent life from conceptionArguments by delegates were compelling AGAINST an amendment to include the deception of the life of the mother exception. I could not have done better myself.

 

 

Contrary to media reports, Montana is NOT weaker than surrounding states in its protection of life. Tragically, states with laws triggered by the overturn of Roe v Wade have life of the mother exceptions.

 

Risk of the mother status used to “justify” abortion can include such things as severe anxiety or depression, an abusive domestic partner, or a prior history of pregnancy complications…not true emergencies. In the U.S. most life-threatening emergencies related to being with child occur in the third trimester, when the baby can be safely taken by C-section and will usually survive.

 

Even in areas of the world where hospital and clinic facilities have less than hygienic conditions, emergency C-section in a life threatening situation is faster and less prone to infectious contamination than abortion. The part of the body invaded through most surgical abortions is the least clean.

 

Furthermore, to reiterate from mt previous email, abortion is NEVER required to save the life of the mother.  For over a decade, I have asked abortion providers and other zealots to give me an example of where this is the case. They have not because they cannot.  Prior to Roe v Wade, if an emergency procedure was done to save the life of the mother, that was NOT considered abortion.

 

To illustrate: Tubal pregnancies are generally considered life threatening to the mother, and they have not been considered abortion…even prior to Roe v Wade. Why? Because their purpose is to truly save the life of the mother in an acute situation, not to destroy the child. Other examples…Within the last ten years, there were two cases in the Flathead local paper about emergency C sections for the mother’s acute illness…one was a mother with an acute blood dyscrasia with a baby at 20-21 weeks gestation (age where it’s questionable if the baby can survive outside the womb) and the other the mother had a cardiac arrest with a baby at 8 months (where the baby is likely to survive outside the womb)…In both cases, mothers and babies survived. If during those emergency C sections, the babies had died, that would not be considered abortion.

 

The purpose of abortion is to destroy the child. The purpose of these emergency C sections described was to save the life of the mother… Don’t fall for the emotional appeals of the abortion zealot deceivers that have no rational nor medical basis.

 

I am not saying women don’t have complications with pregnancies. Obviously, some do. I am saying abortion is NEVER necessary to save these women.

 

Please dispel this ongoing deception. It is used not only to keep the baby-killing going but to make us look heartless toward women in distress.

 

I thank God for Montana’s unabashed prolife Republicans.


Annie Bukacek MD

President, Montana ProLife Coalition