Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Monday, February 8, 2021

Public Notice to The International Court of Justice and the Court of the Lord High Steward

 By Anna Von Reitz

We have for the past five years published our Affidavit of Probable Cause as Americans operating our unincorporated Federation of States: The United States of America.
The evidence of criminal mis-administration, Breach of Trust, purposeful semantic deceit, and self-interested commercial fraud against Americans and against our lawful government has been presented and published worldwide and many claims related to this fraud have been received by The International Court of Justice, the Office of the Prosecutor ICJ, by the Vatican Chancery Court, and others with an authority pertaining to or an interest in correction.
Recent claims by Territorial U.S. Citizens concerning an Act passed by the Territorial Congress in 1871 (but actually repealed in 1874) has prompted us to review that particular Act by their Congress and that, in turn, has prompted a review of the preceding Corporations Act of 1870, also passed by the Territorial Congress.
We find that our Foreign Subcontractors usurped upon powers entrusted to our own American Federal instrumentality, the States of America, operating as the Federal Republic. They were not authorized to exercise our sovereign power to charter corporations, despite claims of Emergency Powers never granted to them and never intended for them to exercise via any delegation of power on record.
They did this "in our names" while claiming to "stand for us" and to "represent" us, while in fact failing to fully disclose the circumstance to the American Public and also failing to render reasonable help and assistance.
The Corporations Act of 1870 was thus an usurpation in violation of both the actual Territorial contract, The Constitution of the United States of America, issued in 1789, and a trespass against our lawful Government.
The Corporations Act of 1870, is, as such, null and void from inception, having no sovereign source of authority from us, and no excuse to presume British Trusteeship.
Please note: The Corporations Act of 1870 followed the publication of a deceptive Territorial Corporation charter in 1868, which closely copied The Constitution of the United States of America, but sought to unlawfully convert it into the charter of a Scottish Commercial Corporation, which then proceeded to impersonate our Federation of States as "The United States of America"----Incorporated.
This national-scale identity theft and impersonation scheme allowed the criminals responsible to access our National Trust Assets and Credit in precisely the same way that a credit card hacker achieves the same ends today.
This, then, establishes a pattern of deliberate fraud, semantic deceit, usurpation and impersonation by the British Territorial Government at that time, and by the Royal Bank of Scotland, in particular.
The fraudulent and undisclosed enclosure of The Constitution of the United States of America for use as a foreign corporate charter in 1868 was followed by the Corporations Act of 1870, then the adoption of the (failed) Act of 1871 seeking to create a Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia -- an aim which was ultimately accomplished in 1878 ---is all fraudulent, all done in Breach of Trust, and all in violation of the actual Constitutions involved.
The Corporations Act of 1870 was simply another step forward in a well-orchestrated plan to enslave Americans and purloin American assets, including conscription of Americans to fight in foreign mercenary wars for profit by the British Crown, plus confiscation of American public and private assets under color of law and conditions of semantic deceit at home.
The mechanisms to enforce all of this bunko were set in place in May of 1865 with the creation of Military Districts and quasi-military District Courts throughout the Southern States. This was supplemented by the creation of the King's Equity Court via incorporation in the Territorial State of Delaware in 1870.
And again, we find a well-planned and executed Breach of Trust, fraudulent misrepresentation, and theft via crimes of personage and semantic deceit, expedited by unconstitutional misapplication of foreign law to American civilians, many of whom had no part in the illegal mercenary conflict known as the American Civil War.
The Territorial incorporation of a Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia also fails for fraud, trespass, and lack of standing to exercise authority that was never delegated by us and not available to the Crown as an adjunct to any "emergency powers" that were likewise never available to the Territorial Government.
So, first the British Territorial Government seized upon and exercised powers of ours that were never granted to it on an "emergency basis" while failing to render us help and assistance in that very same emergency, helped itself to our sovereign power to issue charters, and then further helped itself to exercise powers of incorporation via the Holy Roman Empire's Municipal Government.
The final result is that all Territorial Corporations formed "in our names" since 1870 and all US CORPORATIONS formed via the same processes are void for fraud and lack of standing. Their charters are invalid.
This now leaves us to offer amnesty to all such corporations created "in our names" that are willing and able to correct their charters by the addition of the following clarifications as Articles of Correction and Lawful Conversion:
1. "It is now and has always been our intention to be recognized as American Corporations, and to function as lawful business enterprises, and to stand under the Public Law of The United States." and;
2. "We fully abdicate and rescind and nullify this foreign charter, these incorporations, signatures and agreements established under False Pretenses, exercised under Private Law, or otherwise misrepresented to us by the Municipal Government of the United States and/or the Territorial Government of the United States of America, the British Crown, its Agents, and other Parties engaged in fraud, usurpation, or other crimes. We hereby recognize our mistake and lawfully convert all amenable elements of this, our prior foreign charter, and incorporate and enclose these amenable elements as part of this corrected American Corporation charter." and;
3. "We agree to obey the lawful government of The United States, and in the international and global jurisdictions, to obey the lawful government of The United States of America, and to operate for lawful purposes and under the correct Public Law from now on, without coercion, without reservation, and without recourse." and;
4. "We shall impose these same obligations upon our heirs and assigns, as part of our commitment to Good Faith business practices, our obligation to serve the Public Good, and our debt to Public Law, which provides us with limited indemnity."
So to be said with the living breath, signed, and sealed by the Officers of the US CORP and USA, Inc. Corporations desiring amnesty. Those corporations that do not add these Articles of Correction and Lawful Conversion may be presumed to be willfully operating unlawfully as pirates, privateers, or mercenaries and may be arrested, liquidated, or impounded. Their assets may be considered fruits of unjust enrichment and similarly disposed of, including both material and intellectual properties.
Those US CORP and USA, Inc. corporations that are truly of British origin and having more than half their shareholder base in Britain or the Commonwealth may decamp without rancor or obstruction from our shores, in order to similarly re-charter under the auspices of the lawful government of Great Britain.
The same accommodations shall apply to corporate interests of other nations caught up in this settlement, with the provision that all such corporations must lawfully convert their operations and stand under the Public Law of their respective homelands to retain their right to exist and to obtain the protections of international law pertaining to these accommodations.
In no case shall it be considered sufficient protection of the public trust for any corporation to function on a legal basis, apart from those exigencies caused by actual public service; the private domain and the unique nature and ownership interests of living people and the separate public domain of our Lawful Persons must be recognized and maintained in order to preserve the Public Law and Heritage of our Nations, whereupon we establish and publish these conditions for international and global amnesty being conditionally extended to those corporations that have been, through no fault of their own, operating under invalid charters issued in our names.
All corporations needing and seeking amnesty as American Corporations have one (1) year from this date, 7th of February 2021, to adopt the required Articles of Correction and Lawful Conversion.
This settlement of these issues may not be construed as settlement of all economic issues arising from the situation herein addressed and described. Further individual adjudication and arbitration will certainly be necessary in some instances and we do not pretend to address all possible controversies that may attach to these extraordinary circumstances.
Our paramount concern in this and all other actions undertaken by our lawful government is to protect the peace, security, and welfare of living people, in our country and other countries worldwide. While we fully recognize the diabolical nature of the fraud and usurpations that have been practiced against us, we answer with compassion for those Innocents who have been similarly impersonated, abused, and deprived of profit and security that is owed to them.

By: Anna Maria Riezinger
Fiduciary for The United States of America


See this article and over 2900 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.


  1. Like to be the process server with this

  2. There was always something wrong with our constitution, when an amendment was made that gave everyone the right to contract without one can impede the right to contract. It never said to contract lawfully. Thats was the biginning of the end for America and everyone else.

    1. James Pansini - Good point on contracts. Contract is law, law is contract. Would it not be then, only lawful contracts? Also, we're deprived of so much information, including historical, & such deprivation results in unconscionable contracting.

      It would be only lawful contracting... then which law? So the law set upon the land, as America... Most all folks today have no clue, but those few who do, what unlawful fiction matrix web's captured us.

      So it would come from land & soil jurisdiction. The creatures of the no-land were given NO LAND for a reason & those creatures are jews. They have no land for they cannot exist upon their own accord & must parasite to exist. Not even stolen land gives them land & yet they are fictionally landed, & for this we pay for their mere existence upon land. And this payment, this debt, for allowing their fictional existence, is their talmudic sacrificial death of all of us.

      And you bring up another most valid & important point, especially at this moment in time: No one can impede on the right to contract [lawfully]. Its this statement which bears great resolve.

      Is this one such great resolve, to require of it:
      Who claims i [one’s] property?
      Who can administer property without right?
      Produce the obligation [contract] upon which the claim is relied.
      - from Christopher James, A Warrior Calls

      This relates to lawful contracting on the face of it, as their corporate/dead law of the sea doesn't apply to living men & women, on the basis of its origin.

      Only lawful contracts apply to the living men & women. Fraud vitiates the unlawful. Are their corporate service contracts/constitutions lawful if its origin didn't come from living men or women? Must a living man or woman have be origin upon it? So as no corporation may contract without a living man or woman to substantiate its existence? As now, we have corporations replicating itself as though landed, as their talmudic simulations of living.

      Such a good basis you've made for questioning. So good. thanks & stay sane

    2. Kitten Zoom Filter Mishap - Look a talking Cat
      Lawyer says: "Judge I'm not a cat"....lmao
      394th District Court of Texas - Live Stream
      This is a live stream of virtual court proceedings in the 394th Judicial District Court of Brewster, Culberson, Hudspeth, Jeff Davis and Presidio Counties, Judge Roy Ferguson presiding. Any capture of video or audio of this stream is prohibited, and may constitute contempt of court with a punishment of up to $500 fine and 180 days in the county jail.

  3. I would, sometime, like to see any responses from any of these respondents/addressees, if any, towards getting a sense of the efficacy of any of your public notices, Anna. With all due respect. I love the language and spirit of them, and have followed you for about 5 years now, but we need a sense that a dent is being made in their global hegemony, lest hope is lost and we are reduced to war-like conditions (civil war or otherwise).

    1. Alex Christos - (love your name Christos) - We ask the same. It may be that only the green return receipt substantiates delivery & occasional reply, as we're likely to also receive.

      Nor we have evidence its taken seriously. One cause for concern is the lack of contract for Anna to be Fiduciary, as without contract to substantiate her self-appointed claim as Fiduciary, there is no contract, thus her claim to be Fiduciary is a belief & belief is not law.
      Contract is law, law is contract. We're not able to see substantiation to this claim, thus we question why would anyone else? Write all the fancy schmancy letters & notices, but unless there is a lawful contract, we ask about its substantiation.

      As this: Monday, April 6, 2020 Dear Mr. Trump - 6 April 2020
      "...Your Administration must without further delay contact John Franklin Hein III and establish the means to move the "legacy trust assets" and actual money and verified credit back into circulation. Mr. Mnunchin in his capacity as an Interpol Officer and as both private and public fiduciary needs to get on the stick and set up the necessary mercantile bank accounts to do this..."
      Anna instructs jew Mnuchin to contact Hein III concerning great trust assets. Who is Hein III & where is his contract? Is Hein III a jew? What account would hold these assets & where is the contract for it? Who is held liable for the account & where is their contract?

      Unless there's lawful contract(s), Mnuchin is wise not to comply with such request as he'd be held liable.

      The reason we ask if jew or not, is becuz our research indicates no jew is landed. Being a jew means no land, as they were not given a land, but are outer-national marauders. Add their deceitful existence, their deceitful history is all fiction, & its upon fiction they rely to exist, extort, defraud, destroy, make their fictional claims upon us, the landed.

      So, are Anna's letters & notices being recognized? Or is this just another of a number of claimants with no lawful contract to substantiate such claims? As Fiduciary for The United States of America, she presents onto the high seas & air, yes or no? Contracts are required, yes or no?

      As far as we gather, Anna's claims are by possession of seals, having a said bloodline provenance, which has been disputed as being lawful heirs to such seals, thus claims. Thus far, the history upon which such claims are relied, is fiction, as all our said history is made up fiction, published by .... wait for it... jews.

      It isn't definitive that her claims are false, as they may be correct, however, the said history, provenance is fiction. WHAT IF: Such as the Habsburgs never existed, it is a fabrication, inserted into a false historical timeline. Same for the Medici. Nor was there a Dark Ages, nor a John Lacklands from England, the Magna Carta's dating & location is in question, as its not from England. ????

      We have the same questions as you. We hope all this isn't in vain. thanks & stay sane

  4. A contract must be transparent,it hast to be beneficial to parties involved , however if it has a signature it’s dam hard to say you were decided.
    Frankly our bill of rights are law in a common law trespass we site what right is violated.

    1. One-party contract signature is not a valid contract. The whole country is sleeping too long too far. And the bar jerks with their coordinated banksters
      Pretended dumb, to defraud the sheriffs to their accomplished crimes together, With Top mayors, In major cities in America. NO SHAME...SO FAR..

  5. The full court press is on full view for the world leave them a little exposed.
    The Supreme Court turns out Barrett is and had all ways been a deep state as Joel Scolsen.tevies her record ,Kavanaw judge Napolitino tried to block him because he was the scribbler of the patriot act, and Gorshrsh is CFR.
    And willian Barr worked for free to save the sniper who shot Randy’weavers family.
    And the international court is Lieber Code that’s Genivia convention is a Jewish bankers laying down bankruptcy to the nations .
    The Vatican chancery Court is all a bunch of Marxist.
    If one once to get legitimately have to turn to international law that all nations accept.
    South Africa has came to that conclusion according to law of nations to get secession (a lawful term) you need two other nations to recognize you check then you need to show it’s the will of the people by signing petition.
    You need other nations to acknowledge you .
    Who has acknowledged we are the legitimate government?

  6. Anna has said chancery court said we have alodial title to soil and land and they are a nation state doe thers one .probally the sue or lekoda.

  7. So lets all just grasp straws and FALL APART....Remember together we are strong and DIVIDED we are WEAK . Lets not tear into the messenger because remedy is not as FAST as we think it should be .Just saying .