Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Sunday, April 30, 2017

Reply to Bundy Stand-Off : A Century of Abuse


By Anna Von Reitz

Doctor Coffman  forgot or doesn't know one particularly vitally important fact:  Andrew Jackson paid off the debt that western state land originally secured back in 1804.  

There has been no valid debt against our land since 1804 in the western states or any other state.  This is an unforeseen affect of the fraud.  Though the perps have tried their best to harm us and palm off their debts, they can't have it both ways at the same time.  

Can George down the street make you liable for his debts?  For example, can he go to the garage and have his car repaired in your name?  No? 


So why is everyone standing around "accepting the debts" of the Territorial and Municipal United States "as if" the debts of these foreign entities were yours? 

Wake up!  Here are the magic words:  "Non-Assumpsit". 

Stop assuming that you owe the debts of the foreign Territorial United States and equally, stop assuming that you owe the debts of the foreign Municipal United States.  

These entities which claim to "represent" you --- don't.  

They have pretended to be your agents.  They've told you that.  They've told other people that all around the world the same lie.  

But the fact is that they haven't been your representatives since the passage of their very own corporate XVIIIIth Amendment.  They have had no Fiduciary relationship to you or your states at all for a hundred and fifty years!  

And without a Fiduciary capacity, they have no ability to sign contracts, no ability to obligate you in any manner whatsoever.  Neither do the municipalities formed under their territorial government auspices. 

They got around this fact by deceit---- fraud, in other words.  

Here's an example:  "Congress" passes an act changing the meaning of "state, States and United States" to mean "the territories and District of Columbia".  (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864.     Bear in mind that at this point in history "Congress" wasn't acting as any Congress related to you or your states of the Union.  It was acting as the governing body of the "territories and District of Columbia". 

A second similar "redefinition" makes "United States" equivalent to "District of Columbia Municipal Corporation"----- much to the dismay of certain parties in the Philippines who thought they had a contract with the "United States" when in fact all they had was a contract with a defunct corporation. 

Don't you all think its time you heard the birds sing again? 

Whatever these yahoos have done and whatever they are claiming, they are wrong.  They have no jurisdiction related to the Bundys.  They have no ability to claim the lands of the western states.   All the "western states" have to do is organize their actual land jurisdiction government and accept the federal lands they are owed.  So do it.  

Follow the steps I have given you.  Surrender the "FEDERAL PERSON" named after you, expatriate back to your actual birth right political status, form your county jural assemblies, then your state assembly----- and claim your land back to your own ownership. 

It is past time for all of you to get up on your hind legs and learn your own history and operate your own government.   Thanks to the Fifty States Claim you still have a  home state to go "home" to and a government to operate it.   

Dr. Coffman has shed light on the history of the abuse of the western states and their land holdings by the federal government and its agencies--- entities that have at best a proprietorship---- but the whole truth of the matter is that we have allowed this abuse by our failure to operate our own actual state governments.  

Most people have forgotten or never known the essentials facts.  

Our states are our nations.  We are born as Wisconsinites, Minnesotans, Texans, Floridians, and so on.  That's why state banks are national banks.  That's why we are a union of fifty nation-states, not a nation of fifty-seven "states of states".  

We have let the "hired help" run rampant for so long that they have assumed that they are in charge and are the actual beneficial owners.  Time to inform them --- and the rest of the world --- otherwise. 

The Bundys have begun that noble effort--- and maybe they did it without all the facts firmly in view, including all the lies that have been told about them and about us and about our states --- but in truth.  


And the truth shall set you---and the Bundys---- free. 

-----------------------------
See this article and over 500 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website. 

13 comments:

  1. From Anna:

    Toss up to all of you--- some people are stumbling over the Roman Numeral representation of the 19th Amendment as XVIIII
    ---- all I can tell you is that is how it is in the desk copy of the Territorial Constitution I have on my desk. I know the correct way to do Roman Numerals is XIX, but given who and what we are dealing with I put it down the same way they published it. Perhaps best to correct to XIX so that people don't hang up on it, but flag the alternative for your own knowledge and future reference. They have done so much with similar names deceits, why not similar number systems, too?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. it is twenty five eye eye eye, just like article one eye legislature, Article twenty five all in favor iii Article one all in favor i

      Delete
    2. everyone needs a reality check as to who the actual problem is.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e59xduyt67c

      Delete
  2. tough sell studying this critical contract treaty of Paris or treaty of peace little illumination on social media . Everyone thinks is all above board but we are scammed all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Judge Anna, you need a reality check about our real problem, especially in cities bigger than most countries. If our problem was only the Corp. U.S. and its employees, even though it would still be difficult, we might be able to accomplish something. But we arent. We are dealing with $400,000,000 people, who all think they are U. S. citizens and worse than than the reprobates in the courts and enforcement authorities put together. "Go Patriots",and not talking about us, im talking about the professional football team that those four hundred million Americans care about instead of this stupid freedom stuff we always talk about...Your singing to the choir. Why dont you address this article to our real enemies who make all this fraud possible.....the 400,000,000 America Nationals that proudly display their US CITIZENSHIP like a peacock. You could have been "General Custerd" leading his few men into millions of warriors giving them the false hope of "winning", because we have the "truth" on our side. If we got rid of all the people in govt. we wouldnt be in any better positions than we are now. Because the people are worse....much worse, because of their ignorance and arrogant delusions that they all know the law better than us. Or they simply pick up the phone(a weapon of mass destruction) and just call 911 on their neighbors or anyone else they want to get in trouble and arrested....and "NO LIABILITY". This system works, because their are no christians on this planet, only ones proclaiming it..... Now thetes the TRUTH. We all know about "non-assumptsit", without prejudice, without recourse, at arms length, without the United States, Non-domestic, Zip code exempt, A4V, Redemption, and all other remedies we have all tried against these millions of "indians" you want to battle with using Custurds last stand for the history books of the millinium. Start addressing the entire NATION, not just us. Or off your high horse and start dealing with president elect Donald Trump, even if you think hes the enemy or part of a different nation in charge of only 19 delagations of authority. Because he can do more with just one "executive order" , than we can do collectively for the next 100 years. You have all the proof. Bring it too him. He might just suprise you...Why would God be protecting him if he didnt think he is trying to do the right thing. I just heard him say on an ABC that he thinks the position of president of the US needs God more, not less, because of the incredible power of a president. Quite a statement from a person who everyone claims has the ego of a God. Dont believe that fake bullshit(news). If you can corrispond with Karen Hurdes(who has quit and turned against the banks), and the pope who controls the entire planet, than i think you can deal with Trump. Maybe even get a postion with him as advisory to the "lawful republic". Yourll never know until you try. We need him wheather you think so or not. Thats were god really wants you. Stop avoiding it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A truly great post from Jim.
      This is also what I feel is needed as this window is only open for a short time...and then~?

      Delete
    2. Go Anna, Go Anna, and educate Trump, you can do it

      Delete
  4. Thanks for the Article Judge Anna -
    I can appreciate this article at best but in theory if this is not "ALL INCLUSIVE" meaning everyone in the USA, including the Indians, Blacks, and other ethnicity's, we would be able to usher in the normalcy that you are seeking. No more DEBT, No more LIES, and NO more cover-ups of any kind.
    We have to rewrite, amend, and change the laws to INCLUDE all nationalities. This will make it work for everyone who believes that they are represented within the confines of the Constitution and not just Civil Rights aligned to give a dog a bone. ALL RACES need to feel represented under the confines of the Constitution.
    What happens when we all rise to the greatness of this nation and the outcome is the INDIANS that were initially here first are the bearers of this great LAND?
    Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  5. From Anna:

    That has already been done via the issuance of new sovereign letters patent and new Declaration of Joint Sovereignty --- done as of November 2015.

    ReplyDelete
  6. [n]on assumpsit [Latin "he did not undertake"] (17c) Hist. A general denial in an action of assumpsit.

    "'Non assumpsit' is the general issue in assumpsit, whether special or general, and is in effect a formal denial of liability on the promise or contract alleged. It denies not only the inducement or statement of the plaintiff's right, but also the breach, and allows any defense tending to show that there was no debt or cause of action a the time of commencing suit." Benjamin J. Shipman, Handbook of Common-Law Pleading § 182, at 322 (Henry Winthrop Ballantine ed., 3d ed. 1923)."

    [A]ssumpsit. [Law Latin "he undertook"] (16c) 1. An express or implied promise, not under seal, by which one person undertakes to do some act or pay something to another . 2. A common-law action for breach of such a promise or for breach of a contract .

    "It was early known as 'trespass on the case upon promises,' but in time came to be designated assumpsit (he assumed or promised), and lies for damages for breach of all contracts, parol or simple, whether written or verbal, express or implied." Edwin E. Bryant, The Law of Pleading Under the Codes of Civil Procedure 9-10 (2ed. 1899).

    "In its origin of action of tort, [assumpsit] was soon transformed into an action of contract, becoming afterwards a remedy where there was neither tort nor contract. Based at first only upon an express promise, it was afterwards supported upon an implied promise, and even upon a fictitious promise. Introduced as a special manifestation of the action on the case, it soon acquired the dignity of a distinct form of action, which superseded Debt, became concurrent with Account, with Case upon a bailment, a warranty, and bills of exchange, and competed with Equity in the case of the essentially equitable quasi-contracts growing out of the principle of unjust enrichment. Surely, it would be hard to find a better illustration of the flexibility and power of self-development of the Common Law." James Barr Ames, "The History of Assumpsit," in 3 Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History 298 (1909).

    Black's Law Dictionary 10th ed. 2004

    ReplyDelete
  7. A creditor on paper freeman here with all his authenticated documents [in canada] not canadian citizen of corporation of canada, did a death certificate as dont accept nothing return as cant be a name... using last name is fraud. We dont have a name, we are "i am" gods son. Revoke all licenses and void as not a citizen of their fraud vessel of sea. Return all deeds to license as they fed govt agreed to be surety, the debtor . Birth Certificate is their person. We not a debtor or sinner and no where is our signature/ sinner on these deeds. Not a citizen (here a canadian, so cant be a name) so unable to contract with fed govt. land is my body, i am a body of water. Evidence of deed BC ... i never applied for BC, there person they agreed to be security of the person. Grace comes from god. Dont fund the machine... if accept mail send back. Im not a subject or slave or chattel. I am that i am. Body is a human being.

    Get witnesses, document, video, use stamp to sign as our witness and as we as postmaster.

    Documents notarized, certicate and authenticated by attorney general (as assumed ward of state lost at sea ... citizen act 4.1 abandoned child seven years .. then intl hague convention Apostille is highest law of land in their world usa secretary xxxxx .. given notice first via ltr

    Then do claim of life .... have people claimed you to be you. , reclaim self. Listen this kid found within seven years old... get letter notarized, certificate and authenticated so they can see you....on their paper in commonwealth, not a person (not flesh) , not a canadian citizen not your signature....Birth certificate not yours return. Can post in newpaper...

    They cant sue unless agreed to be names.

    Service = service us credit union sold your soul take own ship back.

    BC is a contract

    Canada Citizenship can opt in or out , charter mobility rights

    Can do paper 21 days .. for

    SIN/SSN person is deceased but can be used for estate purposes.


    Mail death certificate in cdn to social insurance registration

    Cam make own world passport and POA and peace treaty for iam that i am

    Left canada
    That person no longer alive and you are no longer performing fraud.

    Flesh has no signatures

    Govt has lien on the number and drawing up bonds

    You dont have a surname

    It was the govt of Canada that issues a ontario BC and created a person... trade mark name
    Reclaim all children or self

    Sorry not so organized small boxes are hard to type in on cell.

    Love &!Peace

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. PS write out death certificate in red ink hand written

      I think just thumb print needed to prove who are ... working on ... only witinesses can see you

      Delete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.