Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 2800 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Saturday, January 28, 2017

Interregnum My Rump, Or, Stop Being Stupid Part 26


By Anna Von Retiz

There is no so-called "interregnum"--- yet another specious idea being floated by Bar Attorney Karen Hudes.

According to Ms. Hudes and others of her ilk, our lawful government is in "interregnum"--- a sort of legal coma--- caused by Lincoln's declaration of a "state of emergency" which has been declared every year since then by his successors.

Let's make this perfectly clear--- the only office of "President" that Lincoln could hold was that of a commercial corporation CEO.  This is because Bar Attorneys have been prohibited from holding any public office in our government since March 12, 1819 and Abraham Lincoln was a Bar Attorney.


Commercial corporations have no ability to declare war, nor even "states of emergency", except in the  euphemistic sense that their corporation is in trouble.

Lincoln was not eligible as a Bar Member to hold the actual lawful public office of President of the united States of America, so the only kind of "President" he could be was the "President" of the United States (Trading Company).  

His assumption of the public Office of Commander-in-Chief was an act of fraud, treason, and violation of international law.  

The perpetrators have tried to paper this over retroactively by adopting our lawful constitution as the basis for their corporate articles of incorporation published as The Constitution of the United States of America (1868).  

They have tried by this means to enclose our constitution for their own use--- and they have tried via that means to unlawfully convert the actual office of the Commander-in-Chief to a private corporate office merely called the Office of the Commander-in-Chief.  

The fact remains that this is pure lawless fraud fomented by the Bar, the British Monarch and the Roman Pontiff in gross Breach of Trust against the American states and people.

You can't take a sow's ear and transform it by calling it a silk purse.  It remains a sow's ear just the same. 

And you can't take a declaration of a "state of emergency" made by a private foreign corporation and transform it into anything related in any way to us or to our lawful government.

I have news for Karen Hudes and all the other Bar Attorneys responsible for this circumstance--- there is no "interregnum" and no affect on us or our lawful government by anything said, done, or claimed by the filthy foreign organization in Washington, DC in 1860 or at any time since.


It was fraud then, it is fraud now.
---------------------------------------
See this article and over 400 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.  

11 comments:

  1. That's right bar attorney in violation of 13th ammendment .

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bar attorneys have made sure that any and all languages have been intentionally corrupted resulting in a form of communication that was started centuries ago...."BABBELING". Thats why i tell everyone who is in the patriot community that despite knowing that the supreme law of the land(or the sea) is the UCC. But law schools do not teach attorneys the UCC. They are taught Federal Rules of Civil Proceedure, that mimics the UCC but uses different language and grammer than the UCC. And since they arent going to learn or refuse to learn the UCC, it is absoluty necessary to learn their Rules and Codes so we can translate the UCC into language they can relate too, using their own proceedures against them. For example, if you are using the UCC at 2-201, your own states civil code will show it as calif. civil code 2201. Thats the way they learned it. Notice that the number is identical but not hyphenated. But if you insist on only using the UCC you will be immediately labeled as "one of those patriots" and treated as a rebel without a cause. Its much smarter to fit in than stand out. I know. Ive been in court enough to at least get the respect of the court, even if i dont get remedy...The real problem is getting around their accepted doctrine of "Silent Judicial Notice" which is to constantly notice that we do not have a "perfected claim" on our status. But neither do they. So you have to prove you have a higher claim right off the bat. And it takes the proper filing to do it, and where to do it. And it doesnt take 30 filings to do it like Steve keeps telling everyone. For $2, you can get just 3 filings with instructions on how and where to file at this site......

    loveforlife.com.au/content/08/01/06/standing-winning-peoples-rights-research-group-correct-ucc-1-filing-procedure

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. careful...always best to use state and federal constitutions. their codes are copyywritten and bring you into their jurisdiction. UCC is for paupers and non-freeholders to use commerce with the elites. you need to have four corners in writing and only use definitions when speaking. remember the constitutions are their trust indentures so enforce them and hold them to it. breach of trust and contract, outside of their Office. it is the ONLY thing they took an oath to.

      Delete
  3. My question is where and how can one see an actual valid proclamation of tbe original 13th-Amendment in its original form? It seems to be hidden for obvious reason but must exist-!

    To in finality unravel this "fisherman's knot" this needs to be established for the legal application. Tho would invalidate all suceeding Amendments resting on any subsequent falsities.
    The shakeup would have to be so sever or mega grassroots as to silence both political parties esp Demockery-rats.
    Only Patriots in the vain of the Founding could or should redo this ~!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The holy grail if superior laws is found in self enforcing private consumer law in article 3 fed district.all other laws come second.and your recognised as natural man.a superior creditor.pass it on..prevail with FDCPA

      Delete
  4. Funny talking to most folks about Lincoln you'd think their mentality views him as living during the Old Testament+BC.
    Whereas from my perspective my own fathers father was born before Lincoln ran for office tbe 1st time and Andrew Jackson's VP was still living and well. Truly this was not that long ago yet FedEd wants to only teach from Lincoln onward- evidently for good reason on tbeir part eh~!?

    ReplyDelete
  5. According to Frank O'Collins, Lincoln did not even have enough votes to win the election. Wall Street forced him into office just as they tried to force Hillary into office in 2016. The real President of the united States was Jefferson Davis. When the mercenary army that Lincoln and Wall Street assembled defeated the united States (Southern states)the united States became a nation defeated in war.

    In walks the CITY OF LONDON and declares all treaties null and void. Wall Street 'blinked' and accepted CITY OF LONDON rule in exchange for continuation of their commercial deals. We have thus been under the thumb of the CITY OF LONDON, ruled from BRITISH COLUMBIA/DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA under commercial law of the sea ever since.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Penny4yourthoughts....these judges dont honor the "Truth" or any "oath". David Merril, a member of "saving to suiters" is well versed in these matters, and was seeking remedy, and seemed to have corned the judge, and said he is holding him to his oath. And the judge said ok. When david went to get his oath, he found out the judge changed his oath which usually ends with..."so help me god" to "SO HELP ME GOD". Thats the equalivalent of telling someone you are telling the truth , but with your fingers crossed behind you. They have the ability to change anything they want. They dont play fair. Especially when it comes to patriots. They are getting worse everyday. But Trump is coming to the rescue soon. He just fired the commissioner of the IRS. He is really cleaning house. Its happening. Last night he made an executive order that went into effect so fast, everyone that was muslem were immediately restricted until properly "vetted" , and any muslims already in the air, were ordered to return to the airport. This is the most excitement ive ever seen from a president ever. Its like a 3 ring circus. You never know whats going to happen next. Wall Street cant be far behind.....!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. All indicators show a full court zionists press aginst trump.yet pro Israel hard to figure 100% diffirence camps some jews want America destroyed , others are living high on the hog like it there.
    got the unlimited power of judges (if the clearly get jurisdiction ) like the comment on fed-ed.thinking the same thing .lots of em like thair power
    like sheriff mac cleared the way for constitutional.
    sheriff's but most like the 100 million codes in corperate statuary law.like power it's intoxicating .

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hudes actually used a word that is associated only with the time when the Pope dies and they elect a successor. That time is now. There has NOT been a true Pope of the Universal Church that Jesus Christ founded since the death of Pius XII on October 9th, 1958. http://www.calefactory.org We are living in a time of Sede Vacante (The See is Vacant) And that is why you should not expect anything good from the Vatican. Sorry but Francis is not going to do anything to fix the problems.

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.