Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 10,360 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. WHAT THEY WRITE IS THEIR OWN OPINION, just as what I write is my own.


Showing posts with label Tea party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tea party. Show all posts

Monday, May 27, 2013

What to do about the Tea Parties

If I were a wealthy and influential liberal (for a day), what would I do
about the popularity of the tea party movement? They came on like
gangbusters, had no visible leadership which could be attacked and stuck
to an agenda that was simple, direct and very effective. If they could
hold it together for a few election cycles, America could experience a
reversal of the misfortunes of the past 4-5 decades. Several strategies
come to a liberal mind.

Get them actively involved in the inept projects of the Grand Old Party
(GOP). That's right, make republicans out of them. Give them a few titles,
a chairmanship or two in some of the lower-level organizations but make
sure they do not occupy positions of influence in state or national
politics. If they advance too fast, give them the Boehner or Tillis
treatment.

Join them and convince them to "enlarge" their agenda, thereby watering
down the critical issues that enabled them to connect with so many voters
in the first place. There are endless possibilities in education,
regulation, bureaucracy and all sorts of divisive issues. Anything to take
their "eye off the ball" in the middle of the game.

And, finally, play to the natural weaknesses of all men.

A fascination with the "quick fix solutions", egos and "follow-the-leader"
personality cults. Offer them leaders and spokesmen. Get other
organizations to offer financial assistance and seminars. Once under the
same umbrella, they can then be smeared with the same brush. Whatever we
do, we must destroy their independent nature.

Once their agenda is diluted, detractors will either fade away or become
divisive. Movements like the tea party can best be controlled if we can
keep them within the confines of our current political structure, where
many of their activities can be diverted and controlled.

Of course, I am not a liberal and I would never implement such tactics.

Mike Armstrong

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

RED BECKMAN SPEAKS #3


This will be the third ad I have bought in AFP. My wife Earlene and I, traveled the united States of America for about thirty years trying to warn our fellow Americans of what is happening to our great nation/home. When we began to speak out in 1975 we were considered to be radicals, kooks and stupid. After all wasn't the united States of America the richest most powerful nation in the world? The major media lied about us and the preachers in their pulpits said we would go to hell if we didn't render unto Caesar. We were outnumbered but if you are still here in 2013 you will have to admit we were right. I really wish we had been wrong but what we were saying twenty-five years ago has come true. We are living in a nation which is self destructing. Some of our countrymen are beginning to wake up and pay attention to our nation's mistake..

The 2008 general election had a new player in the political game. They called themselves the TEA PARTY and they made enough noise to win some congressional seats in 2010 . Those Tea Party candidates made the same mistake Republicans and Democrats have been making for many years. The Tea Party people tried to make the system work the way they were taught in their government school education. They listened to the media talking heads and believed everything they heard on CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN and FOX news. They wanted nothing to do with radicals like Red Beckman. If the media said tax protesters were bad, they believed it. They believed the preachers who told their parishioners that government is a higher power and we must submit to the laws created by politicians. If Morris Dees, of the Southern Poverty Law Center, said Red Beckman was anti-semitic and a hate peddler, they believed him. If the Law school professor said our Constitution was too old and needed to be brought up to date, they believed it.

Now it is my turn to speak. I too had a government school education. I believed it when they taught we have a majority rule political system. When I checked our history and ancient world history I discovered that Democracies have been tried by many nations and they always self destructed. The Roman Empire was warned by one of its great men that when people learn they can vote themselves benefits from the public treasury that political system would fail. The media in my lifetime have become propaganda machines. In the past the people behind the media curtain decided who would be the presidential candidates. The Tea Party people never asked for my views. When I wrote my 1st book in 1980, I said that Satan was the god of the religious world. In all the years since I wrote those words I am more convinced than ever that I was correct. Morris Dees says that Red Beckman is anti-semitic. Saying this will come as a major shock to most church people but read John 8 in your Bible. If you read verse 44 of the 8th chapter of John you will notice Jesus the Christ was also anti-semitic. Saying this will come as a major shock to most church people but read John 8 in your Bible. In the 44th verse our Messiah King told the Jews they were of their father the devil. If Jesus the Christ, said they are of their father the devil I won't argue with them.

I was born into a religion that taught Jews were God's chosen people. I became a church board member and the teacher of the senior adult Sunday School class. When I was recruited into the Tax Protest I did my own theological research. It was not easy to find that my Evangelical Church was teaching false theology. Romans chapter thirteen told me every soul was to be subject to the Higher Powers. Our Presidents, Congressmen, Senators and Judges were all souls that were to be subject to the higher laws. Man made law is not higher law.

The Tea Party people haven't discovered the second and third votes of 'We The People'. Grand Juries and Trial Juries can keep politicians out of government. Bad law can be trashed by properly educated Americans. The Tea Party of 1776 would not approve of the modern day Tea Party.


Red Beckman was the inspiration to begin the research that proved the 16th (income tax)amendment was never lawfully ratified. Red is the co-author of the great book titled “The Law That Never Was” Vol 1
Beckman is the author of several books:

Born Again Republic……..@ $6.00 ea.
Church Deceived………….@ $6.00 ea.
Why The Militia?………....@ $8.00 ea.
Walls In Our Minds………@ $4.00 ea.
Co-Author of:
The Law That Never Was. @ $35.00 ea.
Add 15% postage & Handling.
Minimum $1.50
Order from: M. J. “Red’ Beckman
P. O. Box 61
Carrolls, Wa. 98609
web site www.redbeckman.com

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Spoiler - Political mind poison. How a third party might win.



Matrixx Entertainment continues to produce and release features and documentaries that matter. After giving the nation the widely popular FIAT EMPIRE, James Jaeger has ramped up his production. Recently released features have been: Original Intent – How the Democratic and Republican Parties are Destroying the American Dream (Ted Baehr, Pat Buchanan, G. Edward Griffin, Ron Paul, Edwin Vieira); Cultural Marxism – The Corruption of America (Ted Baehr ); TESLA DAYS (Nikola Lonchar, Leslie Baird); and Corporate Fascism – The Destruction of America's Middle Class (Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul).


The brand new movie from James Jaeger and Matrixx Entertainment, SPOiLER, is a “counter psy-op” designed to undo prominent programs in the public mind.

http://www.thedailybell.com/2887/SPOiLER-How-a-Third-Political-Party-Could-Win

Friday, July 29, 2011

Who is financing and promoting the Tea Parties?

It might surprise you to know how the Tea Parties are being infiltrated by certain groups trying to co-opt and control them.

Here is a two part article that exposes the RINO, NeoCon and other influences and how to counteract those within the context of the Tea Party movement.

Part 1  http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh129.htm

Part 2  http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh130.htm

Kelleigh Nelson has been researching the Christian right and their connections to the left, the new age, and cults since 1975. Formerly an executive producer for three different national radio talk show hosts, she was adept at finding and scheduling a variety of wonderful guests for her radio hosts. She and her husband live in Knoxville, TN, and she has owned her own wholesale commercial bakery since 1990. Prior to moving to Tennessee, Kelleigh was marketing communications and advertising manager for a fortune 100 company in Ohio. Born and raised in Chicago, Illinois, she was a Goldwater girl with high school classmate, Hillary Rodham, in Park Ridge, Illinois. Kelleigh is well acquainted with Chicago politics and was working in downtown Chicago during the 1968 Democratic convention riots.

The one worlders have always created a place for Freedom oriented people whom they would like to control to run too, where they could be contained and controlled. A place where Liberty minded opposition to their one world plans could be tricked into volunteering to eat, meet and retreat, said differently, a place where the opposition could be drained of their money and time so their efforts would be wasted.

These highly organized and well financed creators of false opposition are experts at sucking in people who don't have the background in history to see them for what they are, and then wasting their time and efforts and money on projects that go nowhere.

Puttuing it differently, if the far left (far wrong) is not screaming at the top of their lungs at you through their SPLC and human rights groups, you are not being effective.

When you get to real critical issues like fully informed juries, and fully informed sheriffs who vow to keep their oaths, then you might be surprised to find that some of the people you thought were on your side are actually fighting you.

Read the articles above, and then watch our two latest movie efforts for solutions.

Get "The Angry American" by Red Beckman and Pat Shannon and get "The Power of the County Sheriff to Stop Tyranny" by Richard Mack and on the same disk "The Solution to Real Homeland Security" by Stewart Rhodes.

These are both available on DVD for one dollar each at:
http://www.redwhiteandbluebox.com/

or watch them here in Windows Media Player Format

http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/Video/angryamerican.wmv

http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/Video/mackrhodes.wmv

Friday, July 23, 2010

HELLO, I'M A RACIST, PLEASED TO MEET YOU

By Selwyn Duke
July 23, 2010
NewsWithViews.com

There is such a thing as a conditioned response. Here’s an example: Leftists call conservatives “racists.” Conservatives cower and stutter some defense. Leftists call conservatives “racists” some more. Conservatives cower some more. Question: How do you think you break this pattern?


We’ve seen this again with the recent vitriol spewed by NAACP head Ben Jealous (a fitting last name). Speaking at the NAACP convention in Kansas City, Jealous accused the Tea Party of, take a guess . . . cue the “Jeopardy!” music . . . “racism.” Just as predictably, many conservatives are running around trying to convince everyone that, by gum, they really are swell guys. No, really. I’m not a racist. I don’t beat my wife. I don’t kick my dog. I eat my organic vegetables and drive a Prius.

Look, why don’t we just save everyone the trouble? Every time a conservative renders an opinion, we can just play a recording with a little weaselly voice screeching, “You’re a wacist! You’re a wacist!” (Barney Frank style) followed by a music video featuring The Cowering Conservative — I mean, 1950s-style, duck-and-cover footage with the tune and all.

And such conservatives abound. Oh, don’t get me wrong, conservative brethren, I love ya’, man. But, frankly, too many of you are saps. You really don’t get it. People who advocated welfare reform in the 1990s were accused of being “racist.” If you’re for border control, you’re “racist.” If you criticize Obama, you’re “racist.” If you oppose quotas, you’re “racist.” If you say that, be it nature or nurture, there are differences among groups, you’re “racist.” If you want English to be the national language, you’re “racist.” The word has become meaningless, only used to stifle and stigmatize opposition. And if calling you a heretic worked in that regard, the left would do that. And if calling you a Fig Newton worked, they would do that.

Nevertheless, the ploy prevents sap conservatives from speaking — and even conceiving of — certain truths. They won’t say that so-called racial profiling is just part of proper profiling, they pay lip service to the relativistic idea that all cultures are morally equal, they refuse to call bigoted blacks such as Obama and Eric Holder out on their bigotry, they tolerate double standards with respect to hate-crime-law application and racial jokes, and they let whites persecuted for making innocent comments twist in the wind. They won’t speak unfashionable truths for fear of becoming unfashionable people. Well, all I can say is that if the Truth can be “racist,” then hello, I’m a “racist.” Pleased to meet you.

And this gets at a deeper point. On the O’Reilly Factor recently, Bill O’Reilly was discussing the Jealous situation with Professor Marc Lamont Hill. You know, Hill is the fellow with a Cracker-Jack-box Ph.D. who looks like a high-school kid heading to the prom. Anyway, the good professor, in so many words, put forth the leftist definition stating that only whites can be “racist” because being so requires one to have “institutional power.” OK, whatever. I accept the definition. Really, I do.

I just reject the word.

What I mean is, I’ve long warned against using the Lexicon of the Left. “Racism” is a term as stupid as “ageism,” only, we’re inured to it. We forget that “ism” refers to a doctrine, system or theory. Thus, of course “racism” will denote doctrine, and is it any surprise that the doctrine is dumb? Leftist doctrine is usually dumb. But what’s even dumber is that we actually embrace the left’s doctrinal terms. This is why I prefer using what simply refers to attitude — “bigotry” — as in Barack Obama is a bigot, Eric Holder is a bigot and Ben Jealous is a bigot. As for “racism,” it was originated by the left. So leave it to them. They can define it. They can whine it. And if they ask me, I’ll tell them where they can stick it.

The point is that you can’t prove you’re not a “racist” to the left, because they’ll just define “racist” as being whatever you are. In fact, sap conservatives, understand something: You’re not going to “prove” anything to the NAACP. You’re not going to prove anything to the mainstream media. You’re not going to prove anything to any dyed-in-the-fool liberal. They are enemies. And enemies aren’t interested in proof; they’re interested in propaganda.

So cultivate the right warrior attitude. Look at it like this: If you were engaging in a cold war against the Nazis in 1938, would you bend over backwards to “prove” to them that their propaganda about you was invalid? Of course not! They know it’s invalid — that’s the nature of evil’s propaganda. And it’s designed to invalidate you. And you don’t respond to enemies with defensiveness and measured responses.


You propagandize against them.

Now, this doesn’t mean you have to lie. Note that while “propaganda” generally has a negative connotation today, it doesn’t denote dishonesty. It is simply, informs The Free Dictionary, “the organized dissemination of information, allegations, etc., to assist or damage the cause of a government, movement, etc.” And to damage leftists’ cause, all we need do is tell the truth about them.

So what this does mean is that you have to stop being “conservative” and start being bold. The only consistent political definition of a “conservative” — the only ones that holds across time and place — is “one who desires to maintain the status quo.” Well, maintenance men are seldom warriors. Conservatives too often take a conservative approach, being cautious while their enemies are callous. They too often bring a rhetorical knife to a rhetorical gunfight. They too often act like losers — and lose.

I am not saying that we should stop making reasoned arguments, but those are for the reasonable (those who can be swayed). They are wholly inappropriate for unreasonable charges from dishonorable children. They deserve your boot. You spit in their eye. For enemies bent on your destruction don’t want compromise; they won’t yield to reason. They are to be fought and, God willing, defeated.

This means that when a Congressman Joe Wilson shouts “You lie!” at Barack Obama, you respond, “Representative Wilson was wrong. Obama lies a lot.” It means that when the left bristles at a satirical letter to Lincoln, you understand that bold, fresh pieces of insanity will always hate satire. And, personally, do I really care that some Tea Party folks juxtaposed Barack Obama and Adolf Hitler on a billboard? Not really. I’m just not that concerned about Mr. Hitler’s reputation.

And what of civility? Be wary. When the left is civil — or calls for civility — it’s usually a ruse. It’s simply the tactic that best helps them achieve their aims at the moment. Here’s how it works: Leftists lie through their teeth, and then, when you respond with righteous indignation, they pout like little girls, saying, “You’re mean! You’re intolerant! What happened to civility! [Translation: You called our lies lies! How dare you!]” Understand that the effect here is to stop sap conservatives from calling lies lies, thus allowing the left to use its greatest weapon with impunity. Also understand that the worst form of impoliteness is insincerity in discourse.

And understand something else: Leftists are cowards. They are creatures of the pack, finding their strength only in numbers. After all, what do you think being politically correct is all about? It means doing what’s fashionable in our time, what makes you popular. A man who believes in Truth, such as Thomas More, will die for his principles, alone, twisting in the wind. A liberal goes the way the wind blows and will die for nothing. Stand up to leftists en masse, and they’ll fold like a tent.
So free yourself. Laugh at the “racism” shtick. Make it a badge of honor. Call leftists what they are: cowards, bigots, liars, demagogues, and, worst of all by far, enemies of Truth. Fight fire with fire. Remember, millions of good Americans are sick and tired of political correctness and will stand with you. So just say to our leftist legal aliens: If you like name-calling and you want to fight, OK. I’m a racist, sexist homophobe, and I’m in your face. What’s it to ya’?

© 2010 Selwyn Duke - All Rights Reserve

Thursday, February 11, 2010

COURAGEOUS NOT CONSERVATIVE Tea Party Takeover

By Coach Dave Daubenmire
February 11, 2010
NewsWithViews.com

I am afraid the Tea Party movement is in danger of being high jacked by “mainstream conservative” Republicans. Both parties have their fingers in the air trying to figure out how powerful of a storm is on the horizon. Can’t you see them paddling their boats to the right…hoping to ride the waves to victory?

Read the entire article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Daubenmire/dave184.htm