Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 6100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.


Friday, July 23, 2021

Notice of Prior Established Default and Liability

 By Anna Von Reitz

This is Notice to the Bank of International Settlements, headquartered in Basel, Switzerland, it's Trustees, Board Members, Settlors, Assigns, and Accounts: you have previously been given Due Process and Notice and have been addressed both directly and via Agents to Principals regarding the liabilities you have promoted and accepted.
It has come to our attention that you have once again changed the date for Basel III Compliance and that this is creating a worldwide banking panic which is unnecessary and which will predictably result in chaos, economic losses, and massive loss of life for no sane reason.
This is to remind you that you are already in cured Default and that continued mismanagement and malevolent behavior will only increase your overall liability and the liability of all your partners, subsidiaries, franchises and agents. We must also remind you that any further breach of trust is a breach of fiduciary duty, which carries a penalty of 800 X the damages which are already published and set at $1,000,000,000.00 per life lost or maimed.
You will return to the original agreed upon compliance date of January of 2023, or you will bear the additional fines, fees, and penalties, which will result in systemic liquidation of all member banks, plus civil and criminal prosecution in international courts.
This liability is pre-established, cured, and non-negotiable.

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America

----------------------------

See this article and over 3200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Shut Them Down -- Info for Litigation Committees

 By Anna Von Reitz

I recently recommended that all of our State Assemblies set up a Litigation Subcommittee as part of their Jural Assembly functions.
There are many reasons why it's worthwhile to do this as one of the first Subcommittees, but let's briefly run through why I am recommending this particular action even before you may have your jury pool and other parts complete.
Here's my reasoning --- (1) Many people who join our Assemblies have been attacked by the vermin and are confused, scared, hurting, or plain enraged. They come to us for help, but they are already entangled in a battle with the skunks and don't know what to do. (2) It's the nature of the Beast to attack on all sides at once, seeking to devour the victims. So we have people hurting from all sorts of causes --- IRS, foreclosures, CPS, and on and on. Every case is different, and it is impossible to cover all the causes with limited funding and personnel. (3) Once they come to our doors, these people feel relief, but if they don't get the attention and help they seek to cure their "legal" problems up front, they go on and cause more problems. They start trying to commandeer the Assemblies to help them deal with their lawsuits, etc.
So here is what we do --- we nip all attacks in the bud and we teach people how to do it and we come together to support each other in doing it --- and we organize this response through our Litigation Subcommittees. This will be a rallying point for Americans who have been similarly afflicted, and for Americans who know that they need a firmer understanding of the laws and jurisdictions.
We can run our law education classes through the Litigation Committees at the same time we are assisting each other with current cases.
Now please read the "conversation" below using Florida as an example, and notice the pleasant, laid back, country-style tone that you need to establish with the Judge. Remember that the Judge is the Referee. You don't attack the Referee. You prosecute the Prosecutor, instead.
The Prosecutor is the one who has to establish jurisdiction for the court and also prove his own standing to bring any claim before the court --- and even though this example is far from exhaustive, it's a good place for everyone to start.
At your first hearing, you say something like, "I am sorry, Judge _________ (whatever their name is). We all don't seem to be communicating very well, and I am sorry about that. I am not trying to be misunderstood or hard to understand.
I object to what this man, the Prosecutor, is presuming about me and I accordingly wish for a hearing of the facts and evidence beginning with discovery of who this man, Mr. Prosecutor, is, and the capacity in which he is acting, because I understand this much --- he has to prove the jurisdiction of the court over both subject matter and my person, and he has to prove his standing to bring any claim against me.
So can we just start over and establish the nature of the claim and the parties? Because I am challenging the prosecutor and his ability to invoke the jurisdiction of the court. (This is your counterclaim and denial of jurisdiction.)
I don't believe that the prosecutor is acting as a Public Officer in any public office related to me and my activities, so I would like to see his license to practice law in this country --- not a guild card, not a green card -- an actual license issued by any level of my American Government. Mr. Prosecutor, do you have such a license enabling you to address me?
[He won't have one.]
Well, if you don't have a license, and you still claim to be acting in a Public Office related to me, do you have a bond and an Oath of Office, as required to be an American Public Official? If so, I'd like to see your Bond and Oath of Office. [He won't have either.]
Now, I understand that you are working for the State of Florida, and I further understand that the State of Florida is an incorporated entity that is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and that it has the Dunn and Bradstreet Number 004078374. [You can find these DUNS numbers in the Appendix of "You Know Something is Wrong When....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause".]
So, Mr. Prosecutor, when you come to court representing an incorporated entity, you are required to have the corporation's charter in your hand, and I would like to see it, please? And if you are not representing the State of Florida or are representing other entities or are representing multiple incorporated entities besides the State of Florida, I would like to examine those charter documents, too. [He won't have anything to show.]
Okay, well, without any valid proof I or the court can see, you are claiming to represent the State of Florida. Mr. Prosecutor, and I need to see some proof of your relationship with the State of Florida and any other entities you are representing here as plaintiffs, so please produce proof that you have a contract with the plaintiffs allowing you to represent them? I need something that has the official State of Florida seal on it.
Now, if you are representing the State of Florida, I assume you have a Business License and a Personal Liability Bond to ensure your Performance--- may I see those, please?
If we assume, and at this point, that's assuming a lot, that you are enabled and entitled to represent the State of Florida, you are representing a franchise organization that is a federated state ---- and that means that you need to have a Foreign Agents Registration on file. May I see proof of your registration as a Foreign Agent with respect to Florida and its people?
Ok, well, Mr. Prosecutor, we're not doing so good here proving that you have the standing to invoke any court in Florida, but nonetheless, just to be on the safe side, I need to give you and the Clerk and the Judge and the Court fair notice of my Foreign Sovereign status under the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. Many people wonder about the meaning of that Act, and you may be one of them, so I will just observe to you that it is Federal Law under the United States Code that requires me to tell you outright that I am a Foreign Sovereign with respect to you, because I am a Floridian and I live in Florida, which is a foreign jurisdiction with respect to the State of Florida, where you and this court reside.
Now, Mr. Prosecutor, do you have a wet, blue ink signature of mine and Witnesses that I signed it, and established a contract between myself and the State of Florida, that you are using as the basis of your complaint?
[He won't have anything. If he refers to The Constitution of the State of Florida, you remind him, "But I, Mr. Prosecutor, live in Florida, not the State of Florida. Are you confused on that point?" If so, you tell him, "Well, the Florida where I live is three dimensional and has physical borders and rocks and trees and rivers. The State of Florida is what they call an incomplete state --- it only exists on paper as an incorporated entity. The Constitution of the State of Florida has nothing to do with me. I haven't signed it and haven't even read it, because it's a foreign service contract.]
Nobody actually lives in the State of Florida, which is part of the problem here. In order for me to have anything to do with the State of Florida, I'd have to be an elected official or officer or a dependent of the State of Florida corporation, and I am notably not any such person. I am a living, native Floridian, with no office of personhood or dependency related to the State of Florida, however styled.
So I am a bit perplexed, and wondering who or what you have mistaken me for? And why? Isn't it apparent who I am? And what I am? Do I need to show you the record of my political status as a Floridian? Or otherwise prove to you my membership in The Florida Assembly? I have proof on the public record, I just wasn't able to bring it with me today.
Mr. Prosecutor, I don't feel that you have demonstrated any contract with me, nor any contract with the State of Florida enabling you to do or say much of anything in this courtroom. You shouldn't be addressing me and making assumptions about me and my political status, and you shouldn't be attempting to subject me to laws that don't apply to me. I stand under the Public Law, not any private law, and I believe that I have made that abundantly clear today.
May I have your agreement that you have failed the good faith and competency tests and are not able to establish either subject matter or in personam jurisdiction for this court? [He will most likely stand silent.]
Judge______________, I think we've all heard enough. The evidence is what it isn't--- the Prosecutor has no standing to address me and has failed to establish the required jurisdictions for the court, so I believe that all consideration of his pleadings should be dismissed, and would ask you to deliver the same conclusions and set me free.
If the Judge has a brain in his head, he will lay down the gavel and dismiss the case on the spot.
Now, what else can you and your fellow Assembly Members do to ensure this good result --- that is, that the bloodsuckers let loose and get back on their side of the fence?
Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net. Declare your political status as an American, record it, and join your State Assembly.
State Assemblies, form your Litigation Subcommittees under the authority of your Jural Assemblies.
The Living Law Firm has been banned from THEIR courts, and with good reason. They were taking it in the shorts too often and on too many subjects and they just couldn't take it any more.
We are going to teach each and every one of you, all those who will study and make themselves approved, how to defend yourselves and stop these false claims where they start, how to remove corrupt and incompetent judges from their benches, and how to help each other to secure justice and enforce the public law of this country again.
It has to start somewhere, and no place better than here and now, in our State Assemblies, within our Jural Assembly Committees and our Litigation Subcommittees.

Let's go. Get ready to polish your cross-examination skills.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Thoughts for Great Britain

 By Anna Von Reitz

Though people are used to thinking of "Great Britain" as a country, it's really not. It is a lumpy Federation of countries --- England, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales, to be precise, which operates under some mutually "donated" delegated powers granted to the British Monarch, otherwise known as Her Royal Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, who acts as their Public Trustee and Owner of all Lands in the Realm.
This is not that much different from the system that was imposed on the Americans --- only that was a custodianship via the Commonwealth instead of a Territorial custodianship ---- not a lot of difference, except as regards the amount of savagery allowed to the Territorial Raj in America, versus the more refined and diabolical savagery of the Municipal Raj in "Great Britain". But I digress.... the real point here is that "Great Britain" and "The United States of America" occupy parallel positions in international jurisdiction, both are Federations of States---States which are by nature singular, unincorporated, and independent. Our States are Wisconsin, New York, Florida, etc. which are all fully formed nation-states in the same sense as England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.
In this way, Great Britain holds the land and sea international jurisdiction, while England, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales hold the soil jurisdiction that overlays the international land jurisdiction belonging to Great Britain.
Thus, in the Bilateral "Blue Dot" Banking System, there are two banks, one International Trade Bank, and one Commercial Bank that is owned as a wholly-owned subsidiary by their International Trade Bank. This allows for the People of Great Britain to trade with whoever they like, or conduct commerce with whoever they need to.
Under these two international Banks and their corresponding Accounts, are national Accounts of the independent countries --- international trade bank accounts for England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales, and commercial accounts for England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, too.
Next, there are County accounts established in the same way.
So, for example, someone living in County Clare, Ireland, will have an account in a Blue Dot Bilateral System Bank, and be able to receive a pre-paid Vendor Account to use to pay off (offset) all debts owed by the STRAWMAN attached to their Proper Name. For most of us that means certain large items like mortgages and automobiles and college loans and utility bills and property taxes will be paid off this way, using a pre-paid credit account. They will have access to traditional banking services as well as credit union services and investment services all under one roof.
They will also have access to educational classes to teach them how to best use and apply these services for their own benefit and the benefit of their communities, counties, countries, and international federations.
Both precious metals and other assets and credit reserves will be used to promote the health, safety, and welfare of all people in all countries, and as we do this, the "national debts" will all be gradually paid down.
This is the part that many people find to be a mind-bender.
Imagine that you have a traditional bookkeeping ledger with credits on one side and debts on the other.
What happens when the two columns are never offset or paid off, one against the other?
A humongous credit develops on one side of the ledger, while an equally humongous debt develops on the other.
When you and your actual country start applying the pre-paid national credit to the national debt, the national debt decreases.
There is no more excuse to claim that you are a debtor or that your government is in debt, when in fact you are owed 150 years-worth of national credit that simply hasn't been applied, and no more excuse for the government "poor-mouthing" about the national debt, which by rights doesn't actually exist.
There is also no more excuse for slush-funding the surplus of both assets and credit for the use of unscrupulous people and "public" organizations that keep those same persons in positions of political power.
All of this has now been exposed and thoroughly understood, and it is simply a matter of enforcing the actual Public Law and agreeing to reorganize. Certain Parties have opposed this "popular movement" which is actually nothing more than enforcement of the Public Law, because they fear that they will lose money and even more importantly, will lose control.
This is a very old argument --- about 1500 years in the making --- about mankind's capacity for self-rule and self-discipline, and our ability to choose things that are right and good for ourselves, instead of getting lost in fantasy and illusion and drugs and other evils.
There are those who argue that what we need are good, solid, flat-footed, practical leaders to make all the decisions, some sort of "meritocracy", and there are those who argue that the actual end of the misery is for mankind to learn on a one-by-one basis how to self-govern, and for all of us to recognize the fundamental illusion that "money" is.
Creating a meritocracy whose source of power and control is based upon the promotion of a fundamental lie, only leads to another cycle of abuse and corruption. So, I stand with those who stand with education and self-governance and rational thought, which will eventually end the delusions of money and make way for a better world.

Please join the effort.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

A Race That is Already Won

 By Anna Von Reitz

There is a little fear in the air. That fear is being caused by the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) which is threatening to move the date for Basel 3 Compliance forward from January 2023 to August 1, 2021.
If they do that, they have already been given Due Process, have already Defaulted, and already been judged guilty--- and will automatically be held liable for all damages and injuries resulting from their action, including the published $1 trillion per life lost or maimed.
They are being reminded of these facts as we speak.
Everyone should be prepared for some "bumps" and changes, but there is no need to panic.
The wheels are turning to release the Vendor Cards to pay the public debts with pre-paid credit.
Each country needs to get its Bilateral Bank Charter filled out, then needs to fill out a Bank Treaty with Global Family Bank, then needs to fill out one simple Registration and one simple Record to get an account established for their Trade Bank and their Commercial Bank.
From the country level bank accounts, accounts are established for each State and each County, or Province, or Parish or whatever other political subunits apply.
At the same time as people are getting relief from debt, the government units will be funded, and redirected to come under the authority of the people in each country, according to their lawful government structure.
Those of you who heeded the call to get your banks organized and who are ready to move on to the Bank Treaty step, please get in touch with me for the next step.
All the accounts being established now are Fiduciary Accounts. Business Accounts will come next.
Putting your money in the Blue Dot banking system will bring the banks back under the Public Law and put an end to the criminality that has infested them for decades.
It will also protect you and yours from such inanities as "bail ins" and "bail outs".
Those of you who are financially astute need to be on the move and talking together now to get ready for the future.

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America

----------------------------

See this article and over 3200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.