Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9370 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

How to Say No

By Anna Von Reitz

"No" is one of the first words we all learn, but ironically, many of us never really learn how to use it.

We are co-opted in this by school indoctrination, by familial enforcement, and by social convention.  We are literally taught not to say no.

The underlying subconscious meaning of this rigorous training comes down to the message: "its bad to say no" and in too many cases where children are disrespected and abused it can also mean ---"you have no right to say no."

So we get the message early and often that it is wrong for us to say no, even though our parents do it often and with emphasis, and as children, we also get the message that we have no right to do so in the face of parents and teacher and other "authority figures".

No wonder that so many adults are conflicted and even somewhat confused by the simple word, "No."

Consider this your remedial training course.

No is a supremely good and necessary word. It is the counterbalance of "yes" and it is a useful, moral, and in its way, very positive word, too. 

What if you are saying no to being disrespected and abused by your own public employees?  Well, then, "no" becomes a positive word. 

In such a situation, "no" stands in back of right action [Why should you be bossed around by your employees?] and right thinking [Since when do employees tell their employers what to do, or how to do it?] and right ordering of the world [If employees direct employers, the world is upside down and on its head---and we all know that and the effects of it every day.]

One of the glorious things about Donald Trump is that he learned to say no.

He learned to put his foot down hard. 

And as much admiration as I hear for Donald Trump and as much damnation I hear spread about him, hardly anyone realizes that it all stems from his ability and willingness to say --- no.

He knows how to walk away, and that's something that hardly anyone is taught anymore.  Perhaps he lucked out and had parents who were aware of the "yes-man" mentality and bucked against it.  Maybe he arrived at a point in his life where he just got his back up, said no, meant it, and liked the results.

We may never know, but anyone can observe the results.

People all over this continent and around the globe admire Donald Trump for saying no to evil and bad deals so often and so decisively.  The odd part, is that it never occurs to so many of them that they can and should be doing the same thing, and by all means available.

These people who cheer on Donald Trump on, but don't emulate his action, can look outside their subtle prison bars and admire those who say no, but somewhere there is still a cowed child sitting there, being told, "You can't say no."---- "You are not old enough to say no." or "You're not good enough to say no." or "You don't have the right to say no."

And on the other end of the spectrum we have people who hate Donald Trump and can't even rationally say why.  These are most often Leftists. They almost subconsciously fear authority figures and people who say no, because to them, no is always negative, scandalous, politically incorrect. 

You can almost see them curling up into their fetal positions, thinking: he's going to say no, he's going to nix what we want, he's not going to give us what we need, he's bad because he says no, he isn't nice because he says no, doesn't he realize that its immoral and bad and "socially unacceptable" to say no?

Boy, they say, collectively and silently with a hint of desperation -- we were all taught that as kids!

That's what Leftist indoctrination does.  It disrespects and cows children to the point where simply saying "no" is a radical act, and where the emotional detritus of early abuse remains, ready to explode against authority figures of all kinds.

And now here we are, grown adults, called to examine where we stand on the issue of "no". 

Does the word "no" conjure up feelings of resistance and foreboding? Does it make us pause and hesitate to use it?  Or are we comfortable with saying no, and secure in our authority to use it in a measured and sensible way?

In recent days many people have contacted me about precisely this issue. They are worried about forced vaccinations, forced removals from their homes, force of all kinds being applied from all angles.  How, they plead, can we say no? 

Well, you first get into position where you can say it. 

Our erstwhile Public Employees have gerrymandered things around to the point where you are being mistaken for one of them.  They think that, as one of them, you are subject to the same codes, rules, regulations, statutes, and limitations that they have to embrace. 

If the President of their corporation says "March!" they have to march and not think too much about it, because they are: (1) employees -- paid; (2) employees-- volunteer; (3) dependents -- voluntary, aka. on welfare; (4) dependents -- involuntary, aka, wards of the "state", whichever "state" that may be.

So if you want to say "no" to your employees, you first have to disabuse them of this "presumption" on their parts, that you are one of them, and subject to their corporate "laws" which are in fact rules, codes, regulations, statutes, limitations, and policies.

And you'd better have evidence of the fact, too, because otherwise they just think you are some "wise acre" or bad sport or insubordinate trying to pull something damaging to their food source, their "governmental services corporation". 

They have a tendency to react rather badly to that idea, and generally misunderstand who is who and what is what in situations where their "authority" is challenged.

Nonetheless, it is necessary for millions of us to become informed about our own authority, and to also steel ourselves to the challenges and requirements of assuming authority and saying --- no, as adults. 

No, I am not letting my employees force any kind of vaccination, ear-tagging, or other invasive medical technology on me or my family.

No, I am not paying any taxes that I don't actually owe. 

No, I am not paying off any mortgages owed the State of Nevada organization.

No, I am not registering my private automobile as a "motor vehicle" when I am not using it as a motor vehicle.

No, I am not subjecting my children to any medical procedure or medication that has not been tested and proven to be safe.

No, I am not going to stand here and be sprayed with industrial wastes anymore.

No, I am not having more industrial wastes (Fluoride) added to my water and toothpaste anymore.

No, I am not going to eat food that has been genetically engineered to produce its own internal insecticides, fungicides, and herbicides.

No, I am not going to be drafted and conscripted to serve as a cheap mercenary in foreign wars for profit.

No, I am not going to be abused in any way at all anymore by my public employees. 


The first step in your Remedial "Just Say No" Plan, is to restore your birthright political status and record it over their False Registration, so it a matter of public record and Notice that you are not acting in the capacity of (1-4) above.

You do this by contacting your State Assembly at:

There you will encounter like-minded people who have already taken the steps to reclaim and restore their birthright political status as Americans and people of their State of the Union.  They will happily help you do the same, and then, you, too, will have the unabrogated right to say no, no, no, and no.

Having thus secured your right to say no and having made it public knowledge, your next task is to assist your State Assembly, that same group of determined and knowledgeable people who kept the door open and welcomed you "home". 

Support them and their work with might and main, because they are there supporting you and your government and your right to say "no" to your own employees. 

Your next assignment is to practice saying no. 

Stand in front of a mirror if necessary, smile, speak calmly and logically and say, "Officer, I am not a public employee or dependent of any kind. The only contract I have with you and the organizations you represent is the Federal Constitution. Please look at Article IV and explain to me where you have any authority to arrest me, attack my person, or trespass upon my private property?" 

Offer him a copy of Article IV. 

"And, also, look here --- Article VI."

This is where it says that no other "law" or "thing" (thing means corporation, flag, idol, etc.) stands against the Constitution.

It's best to have both Constitutions handy, both the Territorial version, The Constitution of the United States of America, and the Municipal version (for Municipal police and Federal Civil Service "Agents) which is simply The Constitution for the United States --- no "of America". 

Now, Officer, you can see for yourself that no corporate rule-making, statute, legislation, code or regulation applies to me, and that any obligation you have to these orders is secondary to the obligation you owe to me--- my constitutional guarantees.

This is a learning process, not only about "How to say no." but about who you are and who your employees are, and what your proper relationships are. You have to know that yourself and you have to teach them.

There is a very helpful little website called that provides not only excellent information and sources, but take you through the role-playing practice involved.  If you are feeling a bit unsteady on your feet and want to see someone else actually do this, go there and watch.

You can say no without being obnoxious, after all.

You can afford to be patient and teach someone else things that you didn't know yourself before you "woke up". 

But most of all, stand there in front of that mirror, look yourself in the eye, think of all those things that the "government" threatens you with and burdens you with, and say, "No."  Say it again, "No."  And again, "No."

You must learn to say no and say it with authority. 

A useful blurb has been circulating around about "How to Refuse Vaccination".  This is a special case of saying no and presumes that a doctor or nurse with a needle or worse, needle gun, ready to plunge and FRID ear-tag and an unknown slurry of unproven "vaccine" into your arm.

It uses the military medical term "iatrogenic" --- as in, "Doctor, has this vaccine been proven to have no iatrogenic effects?" 

Iatrogenic is a fancy way of saying -- diseases and maladies that result from medical procedures, like vaccination, like blood transfusions, like intubation, like most of what they like to do to you in hospitals.

If the hovering medical professional can't say yes with a straight face, you then hold the doctor responsible to his Hippocratic Oath, and politely decline vaccination.

His or her Hippocratic Oath binds doctors to "Do no harm."

To avoid this and speed delivery of their highly suspect cocktail of crap into your bloodstream, they may attempt to use nurses or foreign medical personnel.  But it is all the same routine.

No matter how they yell and scream and require their own employees and dependents to do this and that, they have no such authority related to you and your body and your willingness to participate in their experiments--- as long as you have declared and recorded your birthright political status, and politely declined their "offer", they become hugely liable for any damage they do to you. 

Your government, that is, your actual government --- not the foreign subcontractors operating as "governmental services corporations" has valued you at a trillion dollars per head --- that is, we have set a prohibitively large liability fine against any foreign government or agent of a foreign government that kills or maims (permanently damages) any American.

This makes it increasingly unlikely that those foreign governments will test their luck with their "vaccination" agenda against those who declare their birthright political status.  Instead of making billions with their phony unproven vaccines, they will be losing trillions, instead.

And since money and abuse of power, not health, is what this is all about, telling them "no" in as many ways as possible, is important. Discouraging their criminal profit-seeking in as many ways as possible, is important.

Because if you don't say no to people like Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci, if you don't put your little flat feet down and make it count and explain it to your employees in terms they have to understand--- like that whack-job "Governor" in Michigan--- they will presume upon you and treat you worse than cattle.

In their infantile lust for control and their greed, they will ruin your lives. People like this don't deserve to be among us, but they are. If you let them define you and tell you what to do, they will do so to suit themselves and for their profit and for their empowerment, not yours.  They have no morals or sense of humility, no respect for life or for the sacredness or integrity of other souls. 

To them, you are lab rats.  Expendables.  In fact, as they have often said, your population needs to decrease. So it's fine with them if millions of you die as a result of their experiments: fewer Priority Creditors that they owe money to, more secret life insurance payments they can claim, and profit from selling the vaccines that kill, maim, sterilize, and ear-tag "the herd" of course.  

May we suggest that any "population decrease" needs to begin with them?


See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

About Their Attempts to Form a "Government"

By Anna Von Reitz

As you can pick up from reading between the lines, there are a lot of desperate attempts being made to preserve the established world order, at least to the extent of hauling essential chestnuts out of the fire.

Some of you are rightly concerned because you see all sorts of foreign and domestic corporations operating under different names, "offering" to step in and replace the bankrupt governmental services corporations and their banks and other "institutional artifices" with their own.

However, that isn't possible. The States of America have to be rebuilt -- "reconstructed" and they can only be reconstructed by the States. States give rise to States of States. They can't arise like mushrooms overnight, all by themselves, despite what corporations operating "as" States of States might think.

I understand Mr. Trump's dilemma, but the fact is that our unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America is the source of all Delegations of Power, and when the Federal Subcontractors-- however they are organized or named, fail due to incompetence, such as bankruptcy, all the Delegated Powers return to us by Operation of Law.

Those Powers don't just hang around in the ethersphere waiting for some new Tom, Dick or Harry governmental services corporation to form. They have to form a viable corporation, if they wish to operate as corporations, and they have to come to us as the Source, and receive our agreement for them to act as Successors to the Constitutional Agreements.

Otherwise, they have no "powers" delegated to them, no contract or authority in evidence. It all slides right back into our laps and we get to tell them what to do, if they want to continue their jobs. Which is what we have been doing for many months with mixed results.

We've already seen Crown Colony of the United States and Unity States of America and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. and United States of North America come and go, and nobody seems to "get it" when we say that they "can't get there from here".

Because they worked this sleight of hand and got away with it in the past, they think they can just continue on in the same vein, spin another round, and continue to skate on our ticket.

However, we have raised our hands and the wheels are in motion that prevent them from just booting up another corporation somewhere, calling it by some deceptively similar name, and taking over operations here.

We have our own government and that government has been successfully called into Session. It's the difference between dealing with a hibernating bear and a bear that is fully awake.

No new governmental services corporation, foreign or domestic, may "assume" any service contract of any kind with us without our explicit consent. Mr. Trump, individually and personally, has a contract. Nobody else does, so they had better keep him alive and well and smiling.

His contract is limited by the standing Constitutional agreements, but he doesn't object to that.
That said, he and the Generals advising him don't appear to fully understand why they can't just boot up another commercial corporation, inherit the farm, and continue on.

To put it simply, the Landlords have come home. The actual Inheritors are here. Our employees and foreign subcontractors can no longer assume control and propose to represent us or inherit any contract to do so absent our consent.

Imagine it this way --- you hire a housekeeping service, and you empower them to do certain things for you. They can have a key to the house, for example. They are authorized to buy cleaning supplies "on ticket".

But their bosses are dishonest and incompetent, and so, the company providing the housekeeping services eventually goes bankrupt despite being very well-paid and despite stealing as much as they can from their employer.

The same bosses think, oh, well, we jettisoned that debt and discharged everything we owed our employers. Guess we will just boot up a new corporation, call it by some deceptively similar name, assume that our old contract is still ours and what ho, carry on.

They actually got away with that in the past while we were asleep, so they don't understand why they can't just do it again now.

The reason is--- we've objected, officially, and now, they have to deal directly with us and "re-up" under our terms and conditions, or stand down.

That goes for all the various entities trying to claim contracts or rights related in any way to The United States and The United States of America.

This has yet to be resolved, along with the hash they have made of the commercial credit and banking system.

Stand by.


See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

An Object Lesson Regarding "Law" and "Order"

By Anna Von Reitz

Yesterday, I explained the difference between "Law" and "Order", and people discovered --- for perhaps the first time --- that these are two different things. Law may be natural, God-ordained, or man-made, but Order refers to the rules, codes, regulations and statutes imposed by incorporated entities for the purposes of their internal functions and for the discipline of their officers, employees, volunteers, and dependents.

Today, one of my friends sent me this excellent summation of the limits of executive powers -- so long as we adopt and stand in our proper capacity, and are not employees, volunteers, or dependents of the federal entities or their "state of state" franchises operating as governmental services corporations.

Americans cannot take their exemption from corporate "Order" for granted, because our Federal Subcontractors have engaged in a long-term and secretive fraud against us, which results in false claims and registrations to the effect that we are federal employees, volunteers, dependents or franchisees.

All these lies told about us and all these false evidences accumulated against us serve to evade the obligations of these "governmental service corporations" owed to us under the actual Public Law and under the Constitutions.

If we don't rebut these "presumptions" and record our Declaration of our birthright political status, these False Registrations serve to subject us to the foreign, private, corporate "laws" know as codes, regulations, and statutes. And also to the Executive Orders of the "President" of these corporations doing business "in our names".

That said, I want you to read and deeply consider the information below that applies to all Americans who reclaim and declare their birthright political status. I think that this adequately demonstrates why declaring your birthright political status and securing the protections of the Constitutions is vitally important.

Please--- for your own sakes and the sake of your country, don't wait a moment longer to "secure these blessings" and declare your freedom from private corporate executive power. Read on and see what you are missing until you do declare and record your political status.

I quote the material received from my friend for convenience, though I have often cited these same facts and sources. Take a moment to consider how important these protections are in the face of claims of "martial law" and other arbitrary actions related to their claims of a pandemic--- and remember: none of these protections apply to you or your business until you declare and record your birthright political status!
"Neither Presidents nor Governors Have Authority to Issue and Enforce General Mandates that Negate the Constitutionally-Protected Rights of We, the People and our Private Businesses

(emboldening, enlargement, underlining in following authority sites added)
[These quotes are from] a ruling of the United States Supreme Court shortly after the "Civil War" in Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866) which yet stands to this day:

"The Constitution for the United States is a law for rulers and people equally in war and in peace at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine was ever invented than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the exigencies [emergencies/urgencies] of government." pp. 120-121
….there is no law for the government of the citizens, the armies or the navy of the United States, 
within American jurisdiction, which is not contained in or derived from the Constitution.� p. 141
 [This underlines my oft-repeated reminder, that with respect to both the Municipal and Territorial governments and their employees and contractors --- we have one (1) and only one (1) contract each with these entities. The Territorial contract is The Constitution of the United States of America. The Municipal contract is The Constitution of the United States. And that's it. There is no other "law" or contract between us and them, so any time they are talking about codes, rules, regulations, statutes, etc.-- they are "presuming" that you are one of them and are subject to their foreign, private, corporate "laws". ]

In 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, a legal encyclopedia of United States law, suspension of the Constitution is prohibited, as follows:

It is sometimes argued that the existence of an emergency allows the existence and operation of powers, national or state, which violate the inhibitions of the Federal Constitution. The rule is quite otherwise. NO emergency justifies the violation of any of the provisions of the United States Constitution." Section 71

"...Neither the legislature nor any executive or judicial officer may disregard the provisions of the Constitution in case of an emergency" -- Section 98

All public officials swear a lawfully binding oath to not only their state constitution but also the U.S. Constitution and laws "in pursuance thereof" (or, in conformity with). ANY public official who declares the suspension of constitutionally guaranteed rights (to freely travel, peaceably assemble, earn a living, freely worship, acquire goods, etc.) and/or attempts to enforce such suspension within the 50 independent, sovereign, continental United states of America is making war against our constitution(s) and, therefore, we, the people. Whenever they exceed the limits of the Constitution, they perjure their oaths and, thus, vacate their offices and must be held accountable. Their mandates may be disregarded with impunity. If, and when, our public servants wish to enact and enforce any unconstitutional, non-constitutional, and/or extra-constitutional laws and executive mandates, they must do so through the intentionally long and arduous Amendment Procedure.

A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individuals rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (SCOTUS 1803)

An unconstitutional law is void and is as no law. An offense created by it is not crime. A conviction under it is not merely erroneous but is illegal and void and cannot be used as a legal cause of imprisonment." Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (SCOTUS 1879)

An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed. Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (SCOTUS 1886)

Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them. Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (SCOTUS 1966)

[See the language? "Rule-making" and "legislation" result in private corporate "laws" and "statutes" and "administrative codes" that apply to our Subcontractors and their employees, volunteers, and dependents --- not to us.]

"The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows: The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

"Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it...A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 177

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it. The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 256

Executive Orders and other Presidential Directives have no general applicability and lawful effect on anyone other than those in the Executive branch of government and even they must be Constitutional. In Confederate Bands of Ute Indians vs. United States, 330 U.S. 169 (1947), the U.S. Supreme Court noted that presidential authority may not be created by arbitrary action of the President of the United States even if an Executive Order was issued."

So, folks, there you have a good run down of the facts as they apply to you, if and when you reclaim and declare your birthright political status as an American---- but until you do, you have to hop through every hoop, pay every fine, and obey every order issued to you by your own employees and subcontractors.

Think about that. Until you declare your political status as an American and seize-back your birthright and your property assets, THEY can force vaccinations and other "tests" on you, THEY can shut your businesses down, THEY can arrest you for no reason at all, etc., etc., etc.,

Run, don't walk to: and get started today.


See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Dear President Xi, President Trump, and Mr. Larry Fink:

By Anna Von Reitz

Gentlemen, we are at an unprecedented point in history, and as you all know, it has nothing to do with any actual virus. Or even 5G. Both of those unpleasantries are only symptoms of the actual problem: the banking system.

It has come to our ears that Mr. Fink is offering President Xi our bonds as payment toward the US Trade Deficit owed to China.

There are a number of problems with that proposal, which we must bring forward to you and the rest of the world.

First and foremost, Mr. Fink's bonding company operations are all incorporated under our auspices. The United States, Inc. and its franchises were exercising our Delegated Powers when it issued his charters, which means that Mr. Fink's incorporated businesses belong to us, not the United States, and they are forfeit to us for unlawful and illegal securitization activities. Read that: Larry Fink's position as a bonding agent is null and void.

Second, those bonds are defaulted because they are not payable in behalf of the United States, or Larry Fink, or anyone but the people who are the actual Holders in Due Course, for lack of authority to sell them in our names.

Read that: they are defaulted because they don't belong to the people attempting to sell them.
Those bonds were literally issued in each of our names and assigned serial numbers in our names and the assets backing those bonds are ours. Literally.

And we don't owe China a penny.

In case you all missed the point, we, the American States and People, already paid for the goods we purchased from China with our labor at the cash register.

If China didn't get the value of that transaction, it is the fault of the Municipal United States, the Pope, the Queen, and the Government of Westminster. It is not the fault of The United States of America, and not the fault of the Territorial version doing business as "the" United States of America, either.

Third, as you all have cause to know non-consensual securitization of labor and physical assets is a crime throughout the world, and those bonds and the assets backing them have been stolen from the purported Issuers via illegal bonding and securitization processes based on False Registration and Conscription ---- press ganging, in other words, which has been outlawed globally for two hundred years.

In conclusion, though the assets backing those bonds are real, they don't belong to Larry Fink and they don't belong to the United States, Inc., and they don't belong to anyone but those people whose names are attached to them.

Those bonds are the result of outrageous illegal securitization practices and if allowed to be sold in compensation of our Subcontractor's debts to China would represent the fruits of press-ganging, human trafficking, kidnapping, inland piracy, enslavement, involuntary peonage, extortion under color of law, and a long list of other odious crimes against us and against our people, who are innocent Third Parties.

China produced the goods in good faith. We bought them in good faith. Neither we nor China have a problem with each other. We both have a problem with the Middlemen -- again, and they are rushing around with both pockets turned inside out, offering our assets to China in payment of their debts.
This all presents a picture bordering on the ridiculous.

Subcontractors selling their employers into bondage? Then trying to sell those thoroughly illegal bonds to their creditors in payment of their own debts?

No, no, no, no..... we don't know which country Mr. Fink thinks he belongs to or which basket he presumes his eggs are in, but his activities are illegal and he is attempting to peddle goods that don't belong to him and which are not subject as chattel for the debts of "the" Municipal United States.
Those bonds belong to actual living people who are not citizens of the United States, nor for that matter, are the presumed Issuers of those bonds U.S. Citizens, either.

Those bonds belong to the American States and People, doing business as The United States of America [Unincorporated] who have been the victims of a repugnant crime scheme directed by the Government of Westminster, benefiting that foreign government, the Pope, and the Queen---- in Gross Breach of Trust, in violation of their commercial service contracts, and in gross violation of international law.

So, those bonds belong to our individual people and all benefit and possession of them belongs to The United States of America [Unincorporated] in international jurisdiction. We ask everyone concerned to come to their senses and bill the guilty parties.

The bonds and the assets backing them don't belong to Cede and Company, don't belong to "the" United States or "the United States, Inc." or "the United States of America, Inc.", the DTCC, or Larry Fink, either. They belong to individual Americans.

President Xi, you must understand that the American People already paid at the cash counter for all the goods they purchased from China. They paid with script based on the value of their own labor. They are not further indebted to China.

To the extent that these Bunko Artists have sold us all a Bill of Goods and now propose to pay off their debts with illegally securitized assets that actually belong to Third Parties---it should simply be regarded as criminal activity and nipped in the bud.

The stolen bonds should be returned to the non-consensual participants and the assets backing them should be released for the benefit of the victims of this hideous scam. That is what common sense, decency, and international law demands.

Possession by pirates does not change ownership. You can all see the names of the people attached to the serial numbers of those bonds. Enough of this criminality is enough.

The focus now should be on Westminster, and on Prince Philip who illegally received the benefit of $950 trillion in "Life Force Value Annuities" owed to the same victims.

Need we say more?


See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Remember the Swine Flu? And Bird Flu?

By Anna Von Reitz

Remember the Swine Flu?  And Bird Flu? 

I am reposting this article to remind everyone of how this same agenda has been pursued on other occasions --- always with the same end in mind -- a bioweapon disaster planned in cold blood against civilian non-domestic populations leading to forced, poisoned vaccinations, and government control of everything and everyone. 

It's time these criminals were unmasked, arrested, tried, and hung.

They have aimed at genocide for profit and deserve to be dragged through the streets and straight to Hell.

Swine Flu Outbreak Or Bioterrorism And Intent To Commit Mass Murder?   July 12, 2009
by Bill Lindner  
(abridged by

 Jane Burgermeister, an Austrian Investigative journalist, reportedly filed charges with the FBI in Austria on June 10, 2009 against the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), and several of the highest ranking members of the U.S. Federal government, including President Obama and corporate officials, concerning bioterrorism and attempts to commit mass murder, just in time for the anticipated July release of Baxter's A/H1N1 flu vaccine -- though it remains to be seen whether the FBI will conduct an investigation or reveal more complicity in keeping heinous crimes covered up.

Burgermeister prepared an injunction against forced vaccination that is being filed in America. In April, she filed charges against Baxter AG and Avir Green Hills Biotechnology of Austria for producing contaminated bird flu vaccine, with allegations that this was a deliberate act to cause and profit from a worldwide pandemic.
Burgermeister has presented evidence of acts of bioterrorism that is in violation of U.S. law, committed by a group that is operating in the U.S. under the direction of International bankers who control the Federal Reserve, WHO, the UN and NATO for the purpose of carrying out mass genocide against the U.S. population by using a genetically engineered flu pandemic virus with the intention of causing a massive amount of deaths. 
Unsurprisingly, this group involves officials holding high U.S. government offices. Leaders in the Center for Disease Control (CDC) also allegedly know that the vaccine is not safe.
Once again, the U.S. state-sponsored major media has made no mention of this, which isn't surprising when you look at the way they have purposely and repeatedly misled this country -- look at the attacks of 9/11 and all that has happened since the U.S. began the fraudulent 'War on Terror' under the Bush cabal. Illegal propaganda is a powerful -- and dangerous -- weapon the Federal Government has utilized for decades.


Members of this criminal syndicate allegedly include: U.S. President Barack Obama, UN System Coordinator for Influenza David Nabarro, Director-General of WHO Margaret Chan, U.S. Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sibelius, U.S. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, bankers David de Rotschild, David Rockefeller and George Soros, Chancellor of Austria Werner Faymann and Austrian Health Minister Alois Stoger among others.
The charges filed by Burgermeister contend that the defendants mentioned above conspired with each other and others to develop, fund and participate in the final phase of implementing a covert international bioweapons program that also involves Pharmaceutical giants Baxter and Novartis.

BySwine Flu Outbreak Or Bioterrorism And Intent To Commit Mass Murder?   bioengineering and releasing lethal biological agents -- the 'bird flu' virus and the 'swine flu virus' -- as a pretext for implementing a forced mass vaccination program, the syndicate would be able to administer a t

Law AND Order

By Anna Von Reitz

There are a number of subtle language tricks that people need to be aware of when talking about law --- the first is our predilection to talk about "the" Law, as if there were only one Law, when in fact there are hundreds of different forms of law, some of which apply to us and some of which don't apply to us.

The second thing that we do is to assume that when someone says "Law and Order" they are talking about the same thing, or about the "order" that results from obeying "the" Law, but in fact, Law and Order are completely different things.  One is "Law" of some kind, written or verbal, natural-made, or God-ordained, or legislated by men; the other, Order, refers to the rules, codes, ordinances, and regulations that are designed to dictate the operations of corporations and corporation officers.

I often get questions that beat around to the fact that these represent two different kinds or levels of "law".  This morning this came over my desk:

"In the Canon law of the Catholic Church, a delict is the canonical equivalent of a crime. A delict is distinct from a sin, even a mortal sin. One can be legally guilty of a delict and not be morally culpable for a sin, while one can be culpable for a sin and not legally guilty of a delict. 

Isn't that special?" 

And here is my reply:

No, dear. It’s typical. That is the foundational trick between statutory law and statutory infractions under the legislative law established by men for running corporations, versus the Public Law which is based on the Bible. 

Canon Law is the law applying to “corporate officers” of the Church as a body corporate. It applies only to priest and parish administrators and others directly involved as employees — paid or volunteers— of the Church as an organization. 

Say that under Canon Law a man is required to to complete a specific procedure before performing a specific task, but he is not fully informed of this obligation of the Canon Law and does the task anyway.  

He is guilty of a delict but not a sin, because he has not disobeyed any command of God, only a rule of the Church. 

Same thing when we are hauled into court and convicted of a “thought crime” defined by a State Legislature—- we have committed no sin, have not actually and factually harmed anyone or anything.  We have committed a “delict”— an infraction against the rules established by a corporate entity and its legislature. 

So— how is this possible when we are not members of this “church” or other corporate body and not employees or volunteers or dependents of any such entity? 

The only way that we can be held accountable to any such legislative statutes or canon laws, either,  is by mis-characterization of who and what we are and the capacity in which we are acting. 

In order for us to be subject to any such laws or guilty of any such delicts, we must be: (1) employees -paid, (2) employees -volunteer, (3) dependents of the corporate entity — willing, as with welfare recipients, or (4) dependents — involuntary, as with babies surrendered as Wards of the State. 

Once you fully realize this it is very easy to show that these corporations have conspired to establish false claims and registrations related to us all serving to define us as standing in all four of these disabled capacities. 

1. If you are an employee or board member of any entity incorporated under their auspices (which for the Holy See means all and any incorporated entity at all) you are a paid employee. 

2.  If you take up any office or role related to any such incorporated entity as a volunteer you are under the second classification - a volunteer employee.  This is where they entrapped millions of Americans who agreed to pay the “Victory Tax” during WWII and who unwittingly volunteered to perform as “Withholding Agents”—- that is, Warrant Officers in the British Merchant Marine Service. 

3.  This is also their motivation for creating and promoting the Welfare State.

4.  Finally, by creating False Registrations held “in our names” almost from birth, “presuming” that we are all British Territorial U.S. Citizens (and under Dual Citizenship provisions of the Federal Government) and also Municipal “citizens of the United States” too, they establish a False Record and claim that we were surrendered to their corporation as a Ward of the State by our “unwed” Mother, and this then allows the British Territorial State of State to sink its fangs in us and subject us to British statutory law, and then also they allow the Pope to sink his teeth into us under Municipal Law known as “Code”.  

Codex Romanus.  Roman Civil Law.  Municipal Code. 

No American should be involuntarily or unknowingly subjected to any of these foreign jurisdictions or obligated to perform under any of these forms of law. 

We naturally stand under the Public Law that is based upon the Geneva Bible and The Ten Commandments; if we do not actually harm someone or someone’s property, we are law unto ourselves.  Literally.  

So now you see how they have conspired and contrived to “redefine” our individual political status one by one and sought with malice aforethought to entrap American babies in this scheme. 

The parents were never given disclosure and the victims of all this, the babies, were too young to know anything about it. 

The sum result is that we have been living our lives under the lash of thoroughly Unconscionable Contracts—- literally contracts made “for” us and “presumed” upon us without our conscious knowledge or consent— but which continue in force and effect until we wake up and declare otherwise. 

To get the verification and thrust of all this go back and watch all the videos pertaining to the London 2012 Olympics with all the hundreds if not thousands of empty hospital beds and nurses parading around — at an Olympics event? [ I made a mistake here -- I think the hospital beds were at the earlier London Olympics, but all the London Olympic pageants are worth watching to see what the Perpetrators were advertising with these cognitively insane pageant topics.]   

Then view all the black robed and hooded figures parading around the giant effigy of a dead baby at other London Olympics events. 

They were giving required Notice to the world of their intent to commit genocide— on paper and in fact.  

These fraud artists were intent on misidentifying us, subjecting us to their law, impersonating us as “estates” belonging to “persons lost at sea” and— under color of law, claiming that our assets are theirs now. 

All of that was simply a logical outgrowth of their False Registration processes carried out under the various avenues established (1-4) above. 

Having misidentified us as Wards of the State they claimed our assets as chattel backing their debts.  

After seven years they claimed that we went missing — we left the hospital and went AWOL, so they conveniently declared us, the American  version of Our Name — legally dead, while the British and Municipal “citizens” allegedly born at the same place and ALMOST the same time continued to get tax notices regular as clockwork. 

The only absolute record of their crime is the Birth Certificate—- which is Court admissible evidence.  And the eye-witness testimony of millions of American Mothers, the vast majority of whom were not unwed and not ever made aware that they were signing away their children as wards of any foreign State of State organization. 

“Anger” does not even begin to express our outrage. It is much colder than that. It is the calm and murderous determination to put an end to these criminal enterprises and these crimes against humanity and every “government” condoning these practices, too. 

We did our part in the name of Fairness to bring Pope Benedict’s attention to this gross misadministration and Breach of Trust and he responded immediately and continued to make progress toward correction until he was removed. 

Francis circled the wagons and washed his hands of the lawyers and Bar Attorneys with his Moto Proprio—- not wanting himself or the Church held liable for them and their Municipal bosses even though Westminster and the Inner City of London is chartered by the Holy See. 

We waited to see what more he might do toward correction — which is nothing much, except in terms of internal affairs of the Church where he has caused quite an uproar and failed to address obvious repugnant issues of doctrine including those enshrining vampirism and cannibalism and homosexual pedophilia as “sacraments”. 

So— that’s where it stands. 

We are awake and the Americans are making their political Declarations and assembling the States of the Union.  The United States of America is fully operational with 39 States assembled and all 50 States populated by State Citizens who are owed every jot of the treaties and Constitutions. 

All the fraud and all the ways and means they have used to promote it stands revealed.  They have had almost a decade to correct this mess and have failed to do so. 

Let it be apparent that Joe Average Americans stand under The Ten Commandments; we may sin, but don’t commit “delicts” and are not subject to any private law adopted by any incorporated entity absent our fully disclosed, fully voluntary, non-coerced, independent  and fully cognizant act.
So, Peeps, there is a vast difference between actual Law and "law" -- one of which is the actual Public Law, and "private law" which pertains to the internal rules and codes and regulations and statutes governing the operations of corporations, their officers, their employees, their volunteers, and their dependents.

Not knowing this and not knowing that we have been deliberately misidentified and mischaracterized by our own employees, and thus have been falsely registered as foreigners in our own country, and subjected to foreign corporate "law" as a result, has led to millions of Americans being defrauded, pillaged, and plundered by people on their own payroll, misdirected by the British Monarch and the Pope, but most of all, the Pope.

This is because the Pope directly franchises the Municipal Government of the United States and the administration of the Federal Civil Service, and indirectly controls the operations of the British Territorial and Commonwealth Governments, through the Queen, who acts as his Overseer of these domains.

If these realizations and watching the videos of the London Olympics pageants doesn't wake you up and convince you that this is more than my "bat shit crazy" meanderings as one detractor put it, I really don't know how much more it will take to convince you:

You are in the right church, but the wrong pew.  Until you take action to correct that, you will be "presumed" to be a Territorial United States Citizen and a Municipal "citizen of the United States" and you will be subjected under the "private law" of these corporations. 


See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.