Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Monday, September 12, 2022

Your States and Their States of States

 By Anna Von Reitz

Of all the conundrums we have to sort out (and there are many) none is more pernicious than the confusion caused by referring to State of State business organizations as “States” 

States of States, like the (Territorial) State of Wyoming, are not States. 

States are all physically defined, have landmarks and borders and populations of living people. 

States of States are businesses.  They may be unincorporated businesses owned and run by Lawful Persons or they may be incorporated or enfranchised corporations owned and operated by Legal Persons, but such businesses obviously exist on paper and are not physically defined—- and are not “States”. 

The confusion began with the Confederation formed by the original American States of States.  

The actual States had their Federation of States. 

So the States of States formed their Confederation hoping to unite their business interests. 

In the process the American States of States like The State of Georgia and The State of New York started calling themselves “Confederate States”.  

This lapsed further into calling these entities  “States” — when they are not States — and contributing to the overall confusion that people suffer with to this day. 

Businesses are not States.  Such organizations  may conduct business for a State, but that does not make them a State.  

And it must be remembered that each State is perfectly able to conduct business for itself.  The States are not obligated to form or utilize State of State business organizations. 

These “Confederate States” were created and hired to provide routine Government services when the State Assemblies are not in Session, much as you might hire a housekeeper while you go on vacation. 

And just as your housekeeper is not you and does not enjoy the same rights and material interests and powers as you, the States of States do not have the powers and prerogatives of States. 

Our current situation is exacerbated because the States of States we are now dealing with are foreign entities overseen by foreign powers— but the fact remains that a State always stands above a State of State. 

As an actual State Assembly Member you operate in an entirely different capacity and occupy a separate foreign jurisdiction set apart from any jurisdiction inhabited by a State of State business entity.  

Your position as a State Assembly Member once thoroughly understood is far more important and carries more rights and responsibilities than any position in State of State “Government”. 

The Employer stands over the employees.

The Landlord stands over the tenant.

The House Owner stands over the Housekeeper. 

It turns out that knowing the difference between a State and a State of State is absolutely crucial. 

It’s what keeps the world from being turned upside down, and keeps employees from bossing around their employers. 

If you have had enough of the confusion that ensues when States of States are mistaken for States—- go to: 


See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

About the Constitutions - Again

 By Anna Von Reitz

Everything on this page needs to be read and repeated and thoroughly digested until it overcomes decades of indoctrination based on false assumptions and omitted information. 

When Webster published his Dictionary in 1824 he unwittingly preserved the meaning of the word “federal” as it was used during the Constitutional Process. 

“Federal” at that time was a well-known synonym for “Contract”. 

“Federal Government” equals “Contract Government”. 

The Constitutions — all three of them — are service contracts, and they were issued to three separate contractors in three separate years under three separate names, so there is no use in anyone trying to interpret this in any other way. 

All this may be Big News to you, especially as you have probably only seen two of these Constitutions in your life, and you probably never read these two closely enough to realize that they are two separate documents—- The Constitution of the United States and The Constitution of the United States of America.

I am pointing this out to you as a prelude to even more shocking information. 

The Constitutions are not about us. 

The Constitutions are about our Federal (Contract) Government Service Providers. 

The first contract issued in 1787 went to American Subcontractors operating what was called the Federal Republic.  

The second contract which was issued in 1789 went to British Territorial Subcontractors operating an unincorporated business calling itself “the” United States of America (British-American Trading Company). 

The third contract was issued to the Holy Roman Empire in 1790, which was hired to administer the postal system, customs houses, patent and trademark offices and similar services requiring global outreach. 

Your Forefathers explicitly knew that they, through their State Governments, were (1) setting up an American Subcontractor, the Federal Republic, to do and oversee most of the work of their government in international jurisdiction and (2) were hiring two completely foreign governments to perform services for them under contract and (3) were responsible, through their States of the Union for enforcing these constitutional contracts and paying for these services. 

There has been a lot of misguided talk about the Constitution of 1789, which chiefly concerns our British Subcontractors. Other than failure to enforce it, this contract has precious little to do with us, Americans. 

There has also been misguided talk about the Act of 1871 which was repealed in 1874.  The effect of the Act, even if it had succeeded, would have changed the form of the business providing services under the constitutional contract from an unincorporated business to an incorporated business.  

This presages the abuse of bankruptcy protection claimed by these business operators , but in-and-of itself, was not prohibited. Neither was the sale nor the merger nor the succession to contract of the Subcontractors prohibited. 

This is because the contracts themselves remained the same. The obligations remained the same.  

Indeed, the obligations are the same as they ever were, except as properly amended and ratified by the States of the Union —- which means that there have been no actual Amendments to any of the actual Constitutions since 1860. 


Because the actual States of the Union were not brought back into Session after the Civil War, it has been impossible for us to ratify any Amendments. 

We slept and our people were mischaracterized and impersonated as foreigners in their own country, forced to pay foreign taxes, and subjected to foreign laws— by our Federal Subcontractors operated by foreign governments —- the Holy See, the Inner City of London—- aka, Government of Westminster, and the British Monarch. 

All three evaded their obligations and acted in Gross Breach of Trust and violation of their Commercial Service Contract.  

The findings are summarized as our Final Civil Judgment issued in April 2014 at the end of a seven year investigation and due process action by our still-operating unincorporated Federation of States and the remaining known People of each State at that time. 

The Judgment and Orders related to it were delivered to the other Principals acting as our Employees in this matter.  

The States of the Union were Summoned into Session, and here we are, with all fifty physically defined American States accounted for and populated by people holding the correct provenance and adopting their birthright political status. 

Our role as Americans is to enforce the Constitutions and exercise our rights guaranteed by them— while fully realizing that the Constitutions are not about us.  The Constitutions are contracts which our Federal Subcontractors (and their State of State franchises) must obey, while we stand apart under our separate foundation, The Declaration of Independence. 

You must realize that the Constitutions and all that arises as a result of the existence of these contracts is at best of tangential concern to us, Americans.  Why? Because the Constitutions aren’t about us. 

The Constitutions are about our Subcontractors— their rights and obligations, their limitations with respect to us, their operations, their definitions, etc., just as the Federal Code is not substantially about us, with about 92% of it never being addressed to us at all. 

Stop focusing on the guys mowing your lawn and start focusing on your own business— your State, your Government, your land and soil, your obligations as a Virginian, Idahoan, New Yorker or Marylander. 

Your States have been called into Session and are assembling right now.  


See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

I Stand Corrected

 By Anna Von Reitz

As my son, the hard core researcher into all historical rabbit holes has observed, the problem with history is all the omissions. And an omission left uncorrected often has the same effect as an outright lie, because it leads people to make false assumptions and adopt false beliefs. 

There is so much we simply don’t know, especially as regards world history, because the English language press and English textbooks omitted it— almost always with the unstated intention to make the Brits and their affiliates look better. 

I recently made the mistake of saying that Texas was the only State to have formed a separate stand-alone Republic prior to adopting Statehood, and noted that Hawaii was Kingdom —- which it was, however, what was omitted from my knowledge was the existence of a brief transitional Republic of Hawai’i . 

Essentially a junta of sugar planters eager to remove tariffs and trade restrictions blocking them from American mainland markets overthrew the Hawaiian Monarchy in 1893. 

U.S. Marines promptly landed on Oahu in support, and the British Territorial United States recognized the Republic of Hawai’i under the leadership of Sanford B. Dole — as in Dole Pineapple. 

This phony Republic run by American entrepreneurs who had moved to the islands to exploit their agricultural potential lasted five years, until Hawaii was “annexed” by “the” United States in July of 1898. 

The word “annexed” glosses over the hostile take over involved — but it was at that point a take over against the Lesser American Big Fish like Dole, who exercised a king-like authority over most of the Hawaiian work force, and the District Government Big Fish in Washington, D.C.  

For the people of Hawaii it meant one thing— foreign oligarchies operating under a racist British-American Imperialist scheme, taking over and running everything. 

The American home markets were thrown wide open to Hawaiian products and a vast amount of infrastructure began to appear — ports and roads and electrical grids and later airfields. 

So-called American Expansionism had gained its first offshore base in the Pacific—- but upon further consideration we have to ask was this “American” Expansionism or actually British Imperialism at work? 

The American Federal Republic fell in 1860 and still awaits Reconstruction. 

Who or what was at the political helm of this country in international affairs during the decades following the end of the Civil War?  The Scottish Commercial Corporation impersonating us as “The United States of America”——Incorporated. 

It wasn’t “American Expansionism” at all. It was British Expansionism by proxy that led to the annexation of Hawaii and which had engineered the Republic of Hawai’i five years previously, too. 

The people of Hawaii had precious little role in any of these developments so perhaps that is why the existence of the Republic of Hawai’i — unlike the Republic of Texas, drops through the cracks in the history books.  

In any event, I stand corrected. There was a Republic of Hawai’i run for a period of five years by foreign Robber Barons whose progeny remain ensconced in ill-gotten positions of political and economic power to this day. 

The main players in this charade of freedom and democracy were Americans only in terms of place of birth; politically, they were Tories, adopting British Territorial United States Citizenship, and operating their businesses in Hawaii as British Crown Corporations—- and all singing the same tune of British Colonialism and British Imperialism, howbeit with an American accent.

While the actual Americans were peacefully at home, our British Territorial Subcontractors were busy “representing” us and doing things we never authorized them to do—- and all at our expense. 

Many people have assumed that “American Imperialism” was actually American, but no, these actions in Hawaii were carried out “in our names” by Scottish Commercial Corporation subcontractors who were supposed to be providing us with good faith “essential government services” in our own country- not ramming around the Pacific impersonating us and using our credit to back their piracy. 

America didn’t annex Hawaii—- the Scottish Interlopers annexed Hawaii while impersonating us.  

And that is quite a different thing, requiring us and everyone else involved to look at the history of Hawaii and our relationship with the Hawaiian people with new eyes.  They have only recently, as of October 2020, been formally enrolled as an American State of the Union, owing to the fact that our American Government wasn’t in Session in 1959 when Hawaii entered a quasi-statehood as a British Territorial Confederate State doing business as the State of Hawaii. 

As such, Hawaii has never been administered as a true State of the Union and Hawaii’s people have never experienced the freedom and security they are owed.  They have instead labored under the foreign Raj-like British Territorial United States District Government and suffered its predation. 

These same British Interlopers are guilty of the mistreatment of the American Indians and the genocidal practices employed against them, the implementation of the “Reservation” system—- think: “Federal Reserve”—- and so much more. 

As usual, Great Britain is at the bottom of the dog pile—- and both here and elsewhere we see the same patterns of deceit, impersonation, omission, failure to disclose, credit theft, breach of trust and misrepresentation. 

It has been accomplished by similar means throughout the known world — implemented by bankers headquartered in the Inner City of London, and enforced by attorneys — also headquartered in the Inner City of London. 

The Fleet Street Banks and Temple Bar Attorneys have operated a vast criminal conspiracy against the rest of the world, with their members impersonating entire governments —- including ours, for decades at a time. 

Our own people have suffered as a result and we have unwittingly been used as mercenaries in support of criminal activities — pillaging and illegal confiscation at home, piracy abroad. 

Next, we will consider one of the largest, bloodiest and most expensive wars in “American” history— the Philippine-American War, which by an Act of Omission that staggers even my imagination, has been all-but completely forgotten. 

It lasted fifteen years. It cost hundreds of millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives.  

By comparison, the Spanish-American War that precipitated the Philippine-American War, was a ten week spat, not even a paper cut, by comparison. 

One must ask why a war that dwarfed Viet Nam by many orders of magnitude has been “forgotten” and omitted from the history books entirely or given only a footnote? 

Could it be that the Government of Westminster — the epicenter of all this criminality and it’s partner in crime, the Inner City of London, have something to hide? 


See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here:

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.