Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 6100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.

Monday, April 30, 2012

Is your marriage valid or a contract with the state?

A different way to think about lawful marriage.

A different way to think about lawful marriage.

I have said for years that what has been done to the people of America, when through the decades since the founding of our country the organic Constitution was replaced by the US Corporation, has all been done by fraud and deception, threat, duress, coercion, and intimidation, in a unilateral contract form, and is therefore null and void before God and the Supreme Law of our Country.

No matter the language it was couched in, the truth of the contracts were deliberately hidden from the people who were tricked into giving their consent when signing certain documents purported to be the norm for doing business and living in our country. Not everyone can be a lawyer, or be expected to understand the deceptive language in those non-contracts, especially when the whole system is designed to hide the truth, and so overwhelms the average working man or woman with so called 'laws' that they would have to spend full time studying just to begin to understand it all. Why do you think Amerika has more lawyers than the rest of the world combined?

In this article I find further collaboration of that premise in the marriage contract, something similar to which many states use.

These contracts are null and void also because the state (read government) failed to fully disclose the true nature of the contract, and by the very nature of what is called a unilateral (one way) contract they are non-existent from their inception because the government usurped the authority of God before whom the marrying couple thought they were pledging their lives together, not to the state as a contracting party.

In other words, the state (government) tries to take the place of GOD in the contract with hidden and deceptive wording beyond the ability of the contracting couple to understand and therefore the state deliberately deceived them.

Isn't that exactly what Satan did in the Garden of Eden with Adam and Eve?
SATAN HAS ALWAYS TRIED, since his fall from heaven, to take the place of God.

Don't expect any of the corrupt courts, who have been a party to this fraud from the beginning, to agree with you. They are the worst part of the problem from the beginning with their elitist judges who look down their nose at everyone who is not part of their 'good ole boy club'. There are no article III courts for you to take this too. Only admiralty courts judging by the law of the sea, for the US and State corporations.

The true ministers of the Sacrament of Matrimony are the marrying parties themselves, and the true jurisdiction over matrimony is the Church, NOT the State. The Church usually supplied a witness in the form of a priest, but the true ministers of the union are always the contracting parties themselves, witnessed by the invited public. The official witnesses were always the foremost members of the wedding party, namely the best man and maid of honor, but marriage was always to be conducted IN PUBLIC before many witnesses. Let me ask you WHO WITNESSED the State getting God's place in the contract????

NOBODY! That makes it a clandestine marriage as far as the license is concerned and in God's eyes, NULL AND VOID as a contract with the State.

It still can be a valid marriage before God, with all it's "until death do us part" promises in full force and effect, BUT THE CONTRACT WITH THE STATE IS NULL AND VOID ON THE FACE OF IT, because it was FRAUD and because there were no proper witnesses to that part of the contract.

Again I say that NO One can say they could have been a witness to any STATE or GOVERNMENT entity taking the place of Almighty God, the author of the Sacrament of Matrimony, and who alone has jurisdiction through His Church over that Holy Union!

So that leaves two questions you should ask yourself and your spouse.
1. Is my marriage lawful and valid before God?

2. Does there really exist a contract with whatever state the marriage was conducted or licensed in?

Subject: Marriage License.

Does it matter if Obamacare is Constitutional?

If in fact you have signed away your rights from God in favor of privileges granted by the US Corporation it doesn't matter if the health care bill is constitutional or not. The Constitution doesn't apply to you. You have opted out of the original jurisdiction covered by the US Constitution and opted into the Corporation.

Now the twist. What if the whole US Corporation is a fraud? What if everything they are trying to do under "commerce" is null and void because all of that was perpetrated on the people by fraud, deception, threat, duress, coercion, and intimidation, and is a non-contract because it was all unilateral. A fraudulent contract is a NON contract.
I would bet the vast majority of the American People never intended to sign away their rights from God.

THEY WERE DUPED INTO DOING IT by deceivers in government who use double meanings to the words in the English language.

They were defrauded of their rights by double tongued devils with credentials from the bar, who are officers of a non article III court working for admiralty law of the sea originating in the City of London in London England.
Prove me wrong. This fraud is about done.

We outnumber their deceivers many thousands to one, and the people are catching on big time.

Paul Stramer
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Wait until you read this...

A retired Constitutional lawyer has read the entire proposed healthcare bill. Read his conclusions and pass this on as you wish.

The Truth About the Health Care Bills -Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.

To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.

However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people, and the businesses they own.

The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

This legislation also provides for access, by the appointees of the Obama administration, of all of your personal healthcare direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide...

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the due process of law.

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are effectively nullified by this law It doesn't stop there though.

The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;

The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights... Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution." If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights. There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas


If you don't care about our constitution, or your rights under it, just do nothing.