By Anna Von Reitz
Literally billions of people have cause to know and understand the condition of the world of men and angels.
Satan lost the War in the Heavens and was cast down to Earth. Where did he land? The sea. In what jurisdiction has he reigned? The sea.
This is so obvious, so stupidly obvious, nobody should be tasked with observing this, but here I am. Again.
Where do we find the corruption of the law? The jurisdiction of the sea.
Where do we find the start and the end of this corruption? The jurisdiction of the sea.
What form of law has been used to defraud, denigrate, and deprive the people of the Earth? The Law of the Sea.
What dictionary enshrines the logic and defines the twisted jargon of the Law of the Sea? Black's Dictionary, of course.
And what did the authors and editors of Black's Law Dictionary expose about it? That it was a farce. A joke. One of their ancestors started it as a parody of the corruption that was sweeping the courts in his day, never imagining that anyone would take it seriously.
Esquire Black's children and their children made it into a grand whopping farce, but at some point realized that things had gone too far. They got scared at the end and admitted everything, thereby saving their own souls --- but the farce had acquired a life of its own by then.
Even now, I hear the Legal Eagles citing Black's Law as the basis of their definitions and authorities.
Just goes to show you, in a dark way, how lies come into being and how they get enshrined and institutionalized.
It starts with an ironic joke, or a parody, or a bit of twisted doggerel, or maybe a stage play or movie that uses its "artistic license" to overstate or understate the facts.....and here we are, in Satan's domain, off and running.
To this day, most people, including but not limited to attorneys, don't realize that the corrupting influence of the Law of the Sea when mixed with the Law of the Land (precisely what the Brits did in the 1750's) revolves around contracts and different standards applied to create contracts.
So what is a contract? Let's be precise. We should say, "commercial contract" because that is the only kind of contract there is. Contracts are binding business agreements between commercial corporations which are incorporated by General Corporations.
And "commerce" is? Business conducted between two incorporated legal fiction entities.
Right away, this should clue everyone into the fact that contracts and commerce in general have nothing whatsoever to do with the daily activities of average living people -- and therefore, the Law of Contracts has nothing to do with us, either.
The Law of Contracts is split (conveniently) into two Parts, contracts made under the Law of the Land and contracts made under the Law of the Sea.
So look around now and observe what you will see.
Millions of people being misaddressed as if they were commercial corporations or commercial corporation franchises, hauled into courts practicing commercial law of the sea --- as if all these living people were somehow party to or responsible for what? Commercial contracts -- and specifically, contracts in maritime commerce.
Why? How?
Misrepresentation, aggravated and deliberate identity theft, breach of trust, violation of service contracts, and a string of outrageous documented lies going back more than a century and a half.
This entire fraud has been perpetuated by the Inner City of London and its Barristers and their acolytes in the various Bar Associations worldwide.
Nobody else knew, aside from astute observers, because nobody else had cause or means to know. They were the professionals, and they were entrusted to practice their craft with diligence and honor.
So much for that expectation.
They knew that the hapless folk standing in their dock(et)s were not commercial corporations and weren't responsible for administering commercial corporations and actually, in fact, were not aware of any maritime commercial contracts they were supposedly responsible for --- and yet, they, the members of the Bar in this country -- gleefully mis-administered and profited themselves from every single case.
They profited the British Monarch and the Pope acting in his secular office as Roman Pontiff, too.
It was a commission system. The judges got kick-backs and a share of everything they could extract out of the general population as contributions to their retirement accounts, popularly known as the CRIS system.
This wasn't quite enough fraud and chicanery for them.
They also set up a trading floor, where the elite could place bets on the outcome of these "sure thing" convictions at no risk. With a 96% conviction rate, these bets were virtually risk-free anyway, but they went the extra mile and bundled the case numbers as bond packages, so that investors were guaranteed profit overall.
They also set up a "prisons for profit" scheme in which they bilked the public up to $15,000 per day to keep mostly innocent people in jail --- innocent we say, not because they didn't commit (on average) the infractions of statutes and codes that they were accused of, but innocent because they were never legitimately subject to those statutes and codes to begin with.
What functioned as a court system in this country was a virtual carnival of fraud, deception, and gross breach of trust netting billions of dollars per year in every State of the Union, where these courts had no business operating in the first place.
And now, finally, just this past week, this disgraceful, unlawful, illegal arrangement benefiting foreign powers and commercial interests, has been signed over and closed down and handed to Donald J. Trump.
The essence of this change is that instead of these courts being managed as British courts under British law, they will now come under American Admiralty and Maritime Law.
They are still myopically trying to manage commercial contracts on the land as if they were maritime contracts on the sea. This whole situation remains upside down and backwards until land jurisdiction contracting standards are restored.
Why is this important?
Because contracts generated on land and contracts pertaining to physical assets are supposed to exist under the lawful standards of the Law of the Land. Such contracts require the proper identification of the Parties to such contracts, a meeting of the minds, full disclosure, parties acting in kind, true and equitable "consideration" being offered between the Parties... seven (7) requirements that guarantee fair contracts.
The Law of the Sea has no such standards for contracts and neither does the Law of the Air.
In these two foreign jurisdictions, almost anything goes: contracts between Unknown Parties and Third Parties, contracts that are unconscionable can be formed and exercised if the victim doesn't object, contracts that are implied, unilateral, unstated, and unread can be enforced for lack of discovery, no full disclosure of the names and nature of the Parties to contract is required, full disclosure of the terms of the contract can be lacking, contracts presumed to exist by acquiescence are allowed, the use of deliberately deceptive jargon and "legal" terms is allowed, the use of deliberate omission is allowed....the list goes on.
Anyone can claim almost anything about a maritime commercial contract and get away with it, so long as the fraud is not discovered and objected to -- and that difference in contracting standards is precisely why the attorneys have flourished and the people have suffered.
Changing from British Law of the Sea to American Law of the Sea will not change this basic defect.
As to why-- beyond the profit -- this fraudulent practice of Sea Law on the Land has been promoted, it also has coercive power in that the Federal Constitutions granted the Federal Subcontractors regulatory powers over "interstate commerce".
The meaning of the Founders is made clear from the discussion surrounding the inclusion of this regulatory power and its delegation to the Federal Subcontractors: they were concerned that the several States of the Union might set up tariffs and other obstructions to mutual trade and commercial activity between themselves. That's why they used the word "interstate" instead of "international" commerce in an effort to make the target of their concern self-evident.
They were addressing regulation of commerce between States of the Union only, and indeed, only had power to address that much.
Nonetheless, later generations have sought to usurp additional powers and purposes from the Interstate Commerce Clause, and to use general "enfranchisement" and impersonation as a means to impose regulatory powers over people and transactions that were never actually commercial in nature, or which were owed the contracting standards of Land Law.
It has yet to be seen whether or not Mr. Trump intends to merely take over an illegal concession and run it for profit for other masters, or if the fraudulent court system operating under the Law of the Sea is finally, once-and-for-all, being shut down and strictly limited as it should be.
As it must be.
Many people have written to us, elated by the fact that the old "United States of America, Incorporated" has been dissolved and thrilled by the fact that we are returning to American instead of British Admiralty and Maritime Law.
We respond that it is still Law of the Sea. We respond that Mr. Trump and his billionaire buddies have created a new version of the old "United States of America" corporation, only this time, an LLC registered in London.
We are waiting for the true restoration of land jurisdiction commerce and land jurisdiction contracting standards. We are also waiting for the end of corporate "mischief" and impersonation of our country and government by privately owned and operated corporations of all kinds.
Here's a grand example of it:
"Government of the United States" as reported by the D&B Business Information Report, address: 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500-0005, DUNS # 16-190-6193.
Included in the report are 36 pages of fine print detailing the structure of this "government" and 11 pages of UCC filings it has presented since 2026 began.
This is a foreign legal fiction entity being operated from a foreign jurisdiction apart from the States of the Union and their Federation of States, that being the District of Columbia, and yet pretending to have separate authorization to use our trademarks and emblems and credit in ways never delegated to them.
They must return to the limitations of their service contract(s) and their "Congresses" can no longer be substituted for the Congress owed to the States of the Union and the Congress owed to the people of this country.
Yes, the American people have been grossly abused for over a century and a half, but we are not the only victims of this Bad Joke, and so, we are not the only ones owed restitution for a host of crimes committed against the Public Interest.
People from Albania to Zimbabwe are owed the return of their physical assets and credit purloined by these corporations pretending to represent them while quietly pillaging and plundering and impersonating them instead.
Slapping a new name on a different corporation engaged in the same fraud and operating in the same jurisdiction of the sea does nothing to guarantee an end to predation against the living people.
Leaving the "Government of the United States" Incorporated operating under the Law of the Sea is not an effective remedy.
We can always slap lipstick on a different pig, but it remains a pig.
The only way out of this corruption for the Americans or anyone else, is the return of the government(s) to the land jurisdiction and the Law of the Land, via a process of lawful conversion ("nationalization") and peaceful reconveyance of ownership interests, similar to what is already underway in Burkina Faso and elsewhere in Africa.
Our Federation of States still stands and is the lawful instrumentality of the free, sovereign, and independent nation-states occupying this country. Our Federation of States is the Delegator of all delegated powers ever vouchsafed to any federal subcontractor under any Constitution issued in international jurisdiction on the land, at sea, or in the air.
We therefore claim paramount authority over our subcontractors and require adherence to the limitations of our agreed upon service contracts in all jurisdictions.
With respect to the dormant Federal Republic we claim the right of immediate reconveyance of all duties, powers, and assets that have been claimed in the dark and exercised by foreign powers and estate administrators without the knowledge or consent of the American states and people.
They have acted as Executors de Son Tort and conducted unnecessary and unwelcome salvage operations benefiting themselves at the expense of the people and states that have always been owed good faith service.
As with any defaulted service contract lacking performance by the delegated party responsible, the contract does not stand willy-nilly available for any volunteer Successor to Contract, and instead returns by Operation of Law to the delegating authority and the actual Parties to Contract --- the American People.
The Federal Constitutions are themselves service contracts enacted under the Law of the Land and they are owed both enforcement and respect --- including provision of good faith service, adherence to the strict limitations, and none of the "funny business" introduced by then-President Abraham Lincoln, seeking to usurp powers delegated to the American Federal Republic and ultimately, powers belonging to the Federation of States, the States of the Union, and the People of this country.
We call for a worldwide ban on using the name of countries or states or other political subdivisions as the name of corporations and especially as the names of commercial corporations; we call for a worldwide ban on allowing the existence of corporations named in a deceptive fashion such as the "Government of the United States" -- Incorporated.
We open up the debate as to whether or not corporations, especially commercial corporations, should exist at all in any manner or representation whatsoever; we note the evil effects of these so-called "national corporations" and the corruption they have caused, their essential lack of substance and accountability, and the dire results of letting self-interested corporate policies substitute themselves for public policy.
We call for the immediate lawful conversion of all maritime banks and maritime "persons" named after living people -- and an end of all legal presumption of maritime service by anyone not specifically and actually engaged in maritime activities.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
May 2nd 2026
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
