By Anna Von Reitz
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents. Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.
As we have noted, we have an venerable service contract known worldwide as "The Constitution of the United States of America" with the British Territorial company/corporation doing business initially as "the United States of America (a Trading Company)" (1789 -1843) and various iterations of "the United States of America, Incorporated" acting as Successors ever since.
Recently, we have heard that a new version, the "United States of America, LLC" has been drummed up by Trump and his pals at Palantir and Black Rock, et alia, and may be substituting itself as another Successor. If so, they are again acting under conditions of deceit and non-disclosure.
These entities are British and/or British Territorial commercial corporations.
Donald J. Trump is President of the British commercial corporation undertaking the constitutional service contract.
The British commercial corporation operates under contract in maritime and Admiralty jurisdiction.
It operates as a "ship made of paper", with Trump as the captain.
Hence, Mr. Trump holds the Naval Office of "Commander in Chief".
Are you a British Subject? Are you at sea?
USA, Inc. has delegated powers and authority to exercise those powers on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. This is the result of old Naval Treaties that recognized the British Monarch as the Trustee of Americans on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways.
Briefly, note that in the wake of the War of Independence, we were left with a huge commercial fleet and no navy; we needed protection on the High Seas and Navigable Inland waterways, so we hired the British Navy, then the most formidable naval force on Earth, to defend American merchant shipping.
A special form of United States Flag known as the Title IV Flag which is defined according to specific proportions was set aside for the use of the USA, Inc. when it is exercising our delegated powers on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways or in the Territories and Possessions of the United States.
This British Crown corporation acting as USA, Inc. or Successors thereof, is a mercantile entity and has no actual powers of government on its own and only strictly limited delegated powers as a services vendor, as stipulated by The Constitution of the United States of America.
The ownership interest in this corporation is privately held and is most likely highly influenced by the Zionist AIPAC lobby, similar to the undisclosed ownership interests involved in fronting the Federal Reserve, Inc.
The principal role and responsibility of the USA, Inc. is to protect our commercial shipping, and to regulate interstate commerce, so as to promote the free flow of commerce in these designated jurisdictions.
It also has a responsibility to develop new "United States" Territories under the Northwest Ordinance, and provides a (supposed to be) temporary government for these territories while under development to become full-fledged States of the Union.
The USA, Inc. and any Successor to Contract also serves as a more-or-less permanent government for the Commonwealth nation of Puerto Rico, and the other "Insular States" considered to be Possessions of the United States, such as Guam, American Samoa, the American Virgin Islands, Mariana Islands, and so on.
The USA, Inc., and any Successor to Contract, has no delegated authority of its own to declare martial law within any State of the Union nor to otherwise declare war or to set any policy related to our country and people so as to allow or engender any permanent state of war or mercenary conflict or permit occupation by foreign armed forces, including mercenary forces.
The Insurrection Act of 1792 refers to insurrection against our States of the Union and their governments. The Insurrection Act of 1807 extends those provisions to insurrection against the Territorial Government and its territorial "State" franchises, while the Insurrection Act of 1871 extends these protections to the Municipal Government and its STATE franchises.
These Insurrection Acts do not provide authority to maintain any quasi-military occupation of this country nor do they allow for imaginary rebellions or rebellions against foreign entities, rulerships, or monarchs
None of these Acts provide for action against the sovereign nation-states employing the federal or federal franchise instrumentalities.
There is no granted contractual authority for the USA, Inc. or its President to create or defend the so-called "Monroe Doctrine" which is a private policy of a foreign commercial corporation acting at its own behest, not associated with the actual government of this country nor with its own duties owed under The Constitution of the United States of America.
Our service contract clearly stipulates "defense" of our actual country and borders, and self-evidently does not extend to any corporate "policy" such as the Monroe Doctrine which allows chronic, routine extra-territorial meddling and expense related to the defense of other countries or other ill-defined material interests of the USA, Inc.
Our country has been incorrectly charged for the expenses that these Federal Service Vendors incurred in two World Wars and countless lesser conflicts that they willfully participated in with no authorization from the American Government to act on our behalf or otherwise serving to rewrite our meaning of "defense".
The participation of the Federal Service Vendors in all or any of the wars or conflicts against other countries has taken place without any grant of governmental authority from us and without any obvious connection to the actual defense of this country and without any formal declaration of war from our Congress.
This morning we are being peppered with correspondence asking our position on President Trump's attacks against locations within Venezuela and reports that "Jesuit" agencies are claiming that this action was undertaken in pursuit of the Monroe Doctrine.
Trump does have reasonable capacity under Article II to act extraterritorially in pursuit of felons -- which has nothing to do with the Monroe Doctrine, and everything to do with police powers under international law.
We have not seen the evidence that President Trump acted upon, but it is to be expected that this action in Venezuela is a police action, not a political one.
Accordingly, it cannot legally or lawfully result in any destruction of Venezuela's sovereign nation status, any occupation of Venezuela, or any theft of Venezuelan resources.
It certainly does not mean that President Trump is now "President" of Venezuela.
Police actions inhabit a grey area of international law.
We are not bound to suffer the abuses and activities of criminals simply because they are foreign; they are subject to prosecution, arrest, and in the case of capital crimes, some crimes, like piracy on the High Seas, are punishable by death.
This is agreed upon, traditional, customary, and a known hazard undertaken by foreign nationals engaged in such activities.
Any government supporting such criminal activities also assumes a risk for doing so. Think: Ukraine.
If the puppet regime in Ukraine hadn't hosted and provided safe harbor for every repugnant criminal activity on Earth from money laundering and human trafficking to organ harvesting and biowarfare research, there would have been no Ukrainian war with Russia.
Russia might have exercised its treaty provisions and acted to protect ethnic Russian populations in Ukraine; it might have taken advantage of other treaty positions to promote a Russian-Crimean government, but there would have been no reason for war.
International law and diplomacy were sufficient to resolve the treaty concerns. It was the brazen and accelerating criminality being fostered by Zelensky's government, profiting itself by offering transnational crime syndicates free reign and room and board, that finally prompted Russian action.
Smuggling dangerous drugs (and precursor chemicals used to make these dangerous drugs) into our country --- drugs that cause an estimated 100,000 deaths per year --- are capital crimes precisely because this contraband causes death on such a scale.
For years now, President. Maduro has been associated with befriending both home-grown Venezuelan drug syndicates and larger scale regional cartel operations acting within Venezuela. These unregulated substances wind up on American streets and kill American kids, undermine our workforce, and harm our productivity.
The sale of these illicit drugs nets billions of dollars in dark revenue per year, but the losses to our country extend beyond the monetary costs, impacting lives, employment, and GDP. For every single person addicted to these drugs, 3.5 more people are adversely impacted, and for every billion dollars wasted on illegal opiates and synthetic drugs, 2.8 billion more gets siphoned out of our economy.
There's a reason that the Chinese called their fight with Britain over Heroin imports "The Opium War".
We are facing a similar "war" with the same colonialist powers --- only it's not just Opium or barbiturate drugs anymore; now it is a whole vast range of Cookbook and Designer Drugs, that cost thousands of lives every year, and untold financial and social losses and suffering.
Until we see the evidence that Mr. Trump acted upon, we are withholding judgement concerning the action undertaken against targets inside Venezuela.
Prevention of civilian deaths, both American and Venezuelan, is the ultimate goal of armed police actions, and without the existence of a clandestine trade in deadly substances, there would be no need for and perhaps more to the point, no excuse for such actions.
Actions taken to restrain international cross-border trade in dangerous substances should not be mistaken for action under the Monroe Doctrine and should be recognized as international police action, even when those police actions are undertaken by what appear to be military forces.
Please remember that our military was deceitfully and secretly converted into a private mercenary force during the tenure of Abraham Lincoln and has remained in that status until now, when we are making efforts to one-by-one lawfully convert military personnel back to their natural political status and standing as members of an honorable national military service.
The Monroe Doctrine has a far more fluid and insidious agenda quite apart from conventional international law enforcement, and while it may appear similar to police action under international law, the Monroe Doctrine is a public policy of an incorporated entity, one designed to promote and assert armed protection of "American" business interests in foreign countries, but actually being extended to British Crown Colonial interests, instead.
When you say "American" you have to be clear about "which America" you are talking about.
It is not in the interests of our government to promote any form of colonialism, nor to pay for its evils and upkeep.
We have never supported colonial enterprises and do not support peonage, enslavement, press-ganging or forced conscription or any of the other unlawful, illegal, and immoral practices that have been employed by the British Crown to subject people and entire countries via a process of aggravated identity theft.
The British Empire did not sincerely forsake its ill-gotten colonial gains and pursuit of colonialist enterprises; it acted in Bad Faith and simply changed jurisdictions and began operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea instead of operating on the land. It went from the Commonwealth form of colonialism to the much more violent and insidious Territorial form of colonialism.
While outwardly conforming to the conventions outlawing both peonage and slavery brought forward by the League of Nations and passed as international law in 1926, the British Crown sought to evade these obligations by redefining the playing field, and using incorporated franchises as a means to impersonate entire countries and subject them and their people to foreign forms of law that were never meant to be applied to living men and actual countries.
This gross breach of trust and violation of their service contracts led to investigation by the American Government and their conviction by our Courts of Record in 2014.
With the admission by the Roman Curia that legal fictions have no standing related to living people and actual countries, and that the law of corporations does not apply to us, the reign of terror inflicted by the British Empire and its Continental European adjuncts, is coming to an end.
We can all say good-bye to claims and obligations based on "enfranchisement" and "registration", and claims against foreign public trusts established "in our names", and all similar misrepresentations and impersonations promoted by the Masters of Deceit.
We can also say good-bye to the Monroe Doctrine, the Fourteenth Amendment, the Sixteenth Amendment, and all the other arbitrary, unilateral, and unratified pretensions foisted off on us all -- not just Americans.
People worldwide have suffered from the plague of deceit and lawlessness unleashed by the European monarchies beginning in earnest in the 1860's.
By these various "legal" but unlawful devices and inaccessible remedies purportedly legalizing institutional criminality, they have continued to practice peonage and enslavement, genocide and illegal conscription, press-ganging, and other crimes against humanity -- on paper; unfortunately, they have then also used their "pretend world" on paper as an excuse to justify enforcement of their fantasies on living men and women and actual resources.
The result is a world devolved to the level of Dark Age Robber Barons, hiring and misdirecting uniformed thugs to promote and protect their own corporate interests--- and using the public purse to do it, against the Public Interest.
This form of renegade non-consensual government which we have dubbed "Corporate Feudalism" makes a practice of misrepresenting living people as corporation franchises, and waging "war" against franchises belonging to other corporations. Although this might seem harmless, considering that these are all legal fiction entities without actual substance, the line between imagination and reality gets blurred and actual people and property interests are harmed.
We are pleased to announce that the American Government, our government, is back in the saddle. The Law of the Land is being enforced for the first time in over a century and a half.
Today, we have received word that the U.S. Supreme Court has finally overturned all gun permits nationwide. They are echoing principles of jurisprudence set down more than two centuries ago, affirming that a right cannot be converted into a privilege and that resulting privilege then be used to produce licensing revenues.
Two centuries, and the court is finally backing the established jurisprudence on the subject. Be still our hearts.
We may assume that the same provisions apply to the right to travel, which has been unlawfully converted into a privilege to drive and obtain private commercial profits from the use of public roads --- and then been licensed and misapplied to millions of Americans who never voluntarily engaged in any form of commerce at all --- much less obtained any profit from commercial activities.
The courts that have participated in these acts of personage and barratry are now compelled to justify their activities and herein and elsewhere are placed under demand to Cease and Desist enforcement of licenses misapplied to occupations of common right, common activities such as travel for non-commercial purposes, and exercise of common public property rights, such as use of street side and public parking.
These same corporate administrative tribunals are similarly enjoined from enforcing claims of property tax, federal income tax, franchise tax, gas tax, and utility tax; because of the widespread aggravated identity theft that has occurred and the temptation to secure tax revenues from people who are tax exempt, all commercial and asset claims and public trust interests asserted by members of the International Bar Association and American Bar Association are self-interested, in conflict of interest, suspect and disallowed any benefit of presumed contract based on registrations, enrollments, promissory notes, prior compliance, and similar Third Party, undisclosed, and unstated contracts, identities, and obligations seemingly conferred by legislative action on British Subjects and Municipal citizens of the United States.
Misapplication of these "laws" and misidentification of Americans as persons subject to these "laws" is at an end.
Because of the widespread misrepresentation of Americans as British Subjects and resulting "title taking" over their lands and homes and other assets to be included as chattel administered by and held in British Territorial Trusts, most especially, the "Northern Trust", and Roman Municipal TRUSTS, ;ike the US TRUST, these courts have operated in gross and undisclosed conflict of interest.
The "ownership" of the bulk of the Fortune 500 Companies has been purloined from American soldiers and sailors and their progeny using the False Presumption that they are British Subjects.
The "ownership" of most of the land assets of this country has been purloined in the same way. Our silver, our gold, all our substantive and material assets have been purloined, by the same guilty parties who owe us "good faith service" instead.
The people responsible of managing the purloined assets for the British Crown are members of the American Bar Association and/or International Bar Association, and they have sat in judgement over the actual American owners using the impersonation of these Americans as British Subjects as a device to coerce, control, and impose non-consensual debt obligations.
All this has been accomplished under color of law and all without telling the Americans one word about any of this "convenient accommodation" and "special relationship".
They have acted in gross, inexcusable, criminal self-interest and in conflict of interest. They have robbed their friends and neighbors. They have betrayed the most basic precepts of justice, human decency, and contractual obligation. They have made "war" against their employers and conscripted and press-ganged their employer's sons and daughters and used them as cheap mercenaries under pretense of honorable military service.
These False Friends and Disloyal Allies have grossly misrepresented this country and its people, and deliberately hid their own identities and roles so as to unjustly enrich themselves and their "Prince" or should we say, "Arch-Treasurer"?
The Monroe Doctrine may be the doctrine of their foreign British Crown corporation and part of its public policies as well; none of that has anything to do with America or Americans; none of it is suggested by The Constitution of the United States of America nor by any other treaty or contractual service agreement we have with them.
We do not accept any cost associated with their application of their Monroe Doctrine; we have no such doctrine amounting to a license to engage in eternal meddling and coercion and mercenary "war". This doctrinal license to bully is not what America stands for, not what America contractually agreed to, and we can safely say, not anything that America wishes to be associated with.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger - Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
January 5th 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
