No, Bobby....

 By Anna Von Reitz

No, Bobby, that's where you are dead wrong.  Nothing was "replaced" by the Confederation.  Something was improved.  Nothing was ever replaced.  That's just another assumption that they push when they indoctrinate you in Public School. 

The thing being improved was the States of America.  The unincorporated Union of States was adding to its organizational capabilities.  It already had the Federation of States in place and it set up a Confederation, too.  In addition to, not instead of.  "In order to form a more perfect Union...."

They weren't talking about some theoretical "union", they were talking about their Union of States. 

All the instrumentalities and doing-business-as names were retained.  They all continued in use from 1781 to the 1850s when some changes were made to bring the language conventions we use into conformance with our Official Language --- English.  

Otherwise, and throughout, the different bodies simply come in and out of Session, and the member delegates changed hats to do business in different jurisdictions --- national, international, and global, using the same group of doing-business-as names to accomplish that.  

The same people ran the original Union, the Federation, and the Confederation.  The Confederation ran the Federal Republic, which was the American Federal Subcontractor. 

If all three Federal Subcontractors ceased functioning tomorrow, our Federation of States still stands and is still able to conduct business internationally and globally.  

How do we know that?  Because the Federation did all the work later delegated under the Constitutions for five years, 1776 to 1781, all by itself.  If need be, it can do it all again. 

So we called the Federation and its Member States back into Session for the first time in a 160 years. 

We identified people who were eligible and willing to claim their birthright political status as Americans born in one of the nation-states, and we had them declare and record and publish their political status, so that they and their assemblies are fully empowered.  

Each State Assembly represents a Member State in the unincorporated Federation of States.

The Confederation is inoperable because its members were States-of-States that were either bankrupted or ruinated during the Civil War.  The Confederation of States and the Federal Republic both have to be reconstructed by the States and that hasn't been done yet, because the State Assemblies have been dormant all this while.  

So for now, both the Confederation and the American Federal Republic are down for the count, waiting for the States of the Union to finish getting assembled and then set up new State of State organizations for themselves and then, finally, convene them as the restored Confederation. 

After that, the Confederation can take up the reins and run the American Federal Subcontractor, the so-called Federal Republic, if that's what the appropriate Congressional Body decides.  

I don't have a crystal ball, but it may be that they decide not to contract with the former service providers and do everything themselves. There doesn't seem to be any reason, for example, to continue a relationship with the British Monarch as our Trustee on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways.  Those issues and more will have to be discussed. 

My point to you is that we have thoroughly researched these issues for many years and if we were wrong, we'd be in jail.  The proof is in the pudding.  We have already constructed the peaceful means -- the properly assembled State Assemblies -- to make the needed changes: completion of the Reconstruction, control of the Courts, and an end to trespassing on our jurisdiction. 

My further point to you is that a Jural Assembly is a natural part of a State Assembly. The Jurors are all members of the State Assembly because the Jury Pool is drawn from the membership of the State Assembly.  No "Jural Assembly" exists without a State Assembly.  

You and Ron and the others are all charging around claiming to have a separate "Jural Assembly" without bothering to build or become members of the State Assembly that already exists ---and which formed in 2019, years before anything you got going. 

So you can either be members of The Oregon Assembly and participate as members, therefore,also functioning as members of The State Jural Assembly, or you can continue to be off-track and headed for trouble.

The same kinds of assumptions that you are making are what got the Colorado Nine jail terms of over thirty years each.  Instead of being a help to me or to help anyone else, these know-it-all men got themselves cashiered away and unable to even help themselves. They've become an additional burden to me, as I am obliged to seek their freedom and extend diplomatic efforts on their behalf. 

Is that what you want to happen in Oregon?  A whole bunch of you get arrested and tried and jailed, and then the rest of us have to expend our time and effort to negotiate your release?  A process that requires us to take responsibility and guarantee that you won't go off on a tangent again, and will instead seek peaceful redress in the ways required by international and national law?  

If we can't get you to see sense now, how are we supposed to guarantee that you'll see the light after you've cooled your heels in jail?  

It's emotionally and mentally exhausting to deal with groups like yours, because I already know where you are going with this separate "Oregon Jural Assembly". I already know where the trail leads, and I am warning all of you just like I warned the Colorado Nine --- and I quote my last conversation with Bruce Doucette: "For God's sake, wake up, and don't do this.  You can't get where you want to go on this path."

Now I find myself saying the same thing to you and Ron, laying out the same plain facts.  And just as it was with The Colorado Nine, I am getting all these men thinking that they know better than me and telling me I'm a traitor and a this and a that and some other thing, throwing personal insults in my face and making ridiculous accusations, because I don't agree with them.  

I have studied this for going on fifty years and know what I am talking about. Everything that has happened has borne out that I know what I am talking about.  

1. I warned The Colorado Nine.  They didn't listen.  Where are they?  

2. I warned Rod Class and told him in advance what to expect if he took his deer rifle into Washington, DC.  What happened with that?  I think he is still on an ankle-bracelet. 

3. I warned the January 6th Protestors.  I told the Oathkeepers they were being set up.  I told them weeks before. It's on the record of my blogs.  Where are they?  In jail. 

4. I have warned President Trump and his Legal Team, too.  And where are they? Scrambling around, desperate and confused.  

5. And here I am warning all of you in Oregon, too.   

There is a right way and a wrong way to do everything on this Earth.  

My husband and I and those working for the Federation of States (not the "Federal" Government)  have led everyone forward to the point where our State Assemblies have traction internationally as the free-standing, recognized, and lawful  American Government.  That is not an "accident" -- that's the result of a lot of hard work and applied knowledge of history and law.    

If you want to take your rightful place and have a Jural Assembly that has teeth, you need to park your pride and learn some things, then take appropriate action to build your State Assembly and your Jural Assembly with it.  

I don't like being right about some things, but life and time have proven that I am. 

Continue on the road you are on at your own peril.  I have told you to "Cease and Desist" for your sake, not mine.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Don't Be Fooled

 By Anna Von Reitz

Remember that the Satanist Game is always Divide and Conquer.  

In order to play this game, there have to be two sides.  

So they create both sides and control the game.  It's that simple. 

However they want the game to run, they set it up.  

If they need faster results, they make one side look really bad (Joe Biden) and the other side look really good (Donald Trump) to the audience they are playing to.

Some of you are already well-aware of Good Cop - Bad Cop manipulation, and this is just the same kind of manipulation on a larger scale. 

This time around, they want to make the British Empire look good and the Roman Empire to look bad.  So they introduce their British Crown team as the saviors and they promise you things like this: 

1. We'll give your "securities" back. 

2. No conflict with the US System.

3. Diplomatic immunity. 

People think --- money and safety!  

And unfortunately for many, that's as far as they think.  

They don't tell you that Rome is already in control of them, so that no matter what you do, or which side you choose, you are still in the grip of Rome.  And that's why there's no conflict with the US System.  

Why would there be?  It's all part of the same system. 

Just like they don't tell you that it was always illegal and unlawful to "securitize" you and your assets.  

They don't have any choice about returning them-- what's at issue is how your assets get returned and under what terms.  

Under our plan, you and your States of the Union get the ownership and control and full benefit. 

Under their plan, they retain control and ownership and feed you bits and pieces while everything, including you, still belongs to their King. 

And their King still belongs to the Pope. 

According to our plan, you get your stuff back and it's yours under your control and under the control of your traditional American Government--- which you also control. 

According to their plan, they institute a new banking system that allows them to control and survey every purchase you make. 

They can control what brand of butter you buy. Or deny you the ability to buy anything at all.  

And for a while, as long as they are afraid of a slave rebellion,  they'll give you more of your own chicken feed, but then they will crack down again. Harder than ever.  

If you take their "offer" via David Straight and guys like Richard down in Louisiana, all you cows and sheep get corralled again, and you spend your lives endlessly shuffling between their pillar and their post. 

The promise of "diplomatic immunity" is another farce.  

You already have "diplomatic immunity" and they are being slammed (by us) for their failure to provide it.  

They've been trespassing on our turf against our people and we called them on it.  So now, under international law, they have to back off. 

So is Diplomatic Immunity a benefit they are giving you, or is it simply what you are already owed ? 

We are the ones enforcing your "Diplomatic Immunity".  They never "gave" it to you.  

They are the ones who have been illegally and unlawfully trespassing against your immunity all along.  

Now that we are forcing them to honor it, they want to make it look like they are the source of this benefit?  

Count your fingers when you shake hands. 

These people are Liars and Players and they are good at it, but if you have been paying attention you already know that the only good changes are those that our State Assemblies and our Federation of States are creating. 

And don't be fooled when they put on a different mask.  

Some of the "very elect" will be fooled and seduced by these promises of peace and plenty: just sign up for a TreasuryDirect Account, adopt British Territorial U.S. Citizenship, join us and give up your claim to be Americans --- and our King will be generous to you.  

He will give you back a tiny portion of what's yours, about one percent, and in exchange, you will hold him and his government harmless and subject yourselves and your children to his rule.   

That's the deal they are actually offering you.  

In the search for peace and plenty, you must be your own source and determine your own destiny. You cannot rely on any government but your own and even your own government needs your attention. 

No, you can't just leave your own government on autopilot for 160 years and forget how it works. You have to stand up and be your own good guys, and put on your own white hats.  

And if you have the brains of a mouse in heat, you already know how the British King treats his own people.  The list of grievances hasn't changed from 1776 to today.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Reply to Ron Vrooman --- Again, and Everyone Being Misled by Him

 By Anna Von Reitz

You have it completely backwards and have always had it completely backwards. 

In 1787, as we know from period Dictionaries, the word "Federal" meant "Contract". 

The Federal Government is and has always been composed of Governmental Services Subcontractors. 

The American Subcontractor was popularly known as the "Federal Republic".  

It was run by the Confederation of States doing business as the States of America. 

This is confirmed by the records and by the construction of the name and title of "The Constitution for the united States of America" ratified in 1787.  See?  The organization receiving the contract was "States of America".  

This is the "Organic" Federal Constitution which created, empowered --- and at the same time, limited, the new American Federal Subcontractor. 

All this history has been explained to you multiple times, the documents have either been provided or you have been given the proper citations. 

So who or what "subcontracted" with all these service providers, both American and foreign?  

It was not as you say and mislead people to believe "federal citizens" making these contracts.  They would be contracting with themselves according to your "theory".  

Remember that the "federal citizenry" didn't exist prior to the Constitutions.  That's why they are always focused on the constitution, the constitution, the constitution to the point of ignoring all else --- because without their particular Constitution, they have no jobs and no viable political identity.  

We are not in that boat.  With or without any federal Constitution or Subcontractors at all, our Federation of States and our States continue to exist.  

Which is another bone to pick with you.  

The phrase "We, the People" has meaning in both Law and Grammar.  The people live in our nation-states of the Union, while the People function as Lawful Persons in international venues.  

The people are those we refer to as State Nationals or the General Public,  those who have no particular obligation to serve the government at any level.  

The People refers to State Citizens, who owe no obligation, but who freely renounce any allegiance to any other government and serve as International Fiduciary Deputies for their State of the Union.  

We know this from the history, from the way international business was conducted among nations in the 1700s, and from the grammar.  These State Citizens serving as Fiduciary Deputies of the actual States are the "People" in "We, the People", who contracted with the three Federal Subcontractors on behalf of their States. 

Only State Citizens can enforce the Constitutions because State Citizens are the only ones who created and ratified the Constitutions.  They and their Successors are the only Parties to the Constitutions from the American side of the contract

The Union being referred to at the time and place, during the ratification of the Constitutions, is the original Union formed by the nation-states in 1776, and is not to be confused with the "Union" that fought in the Civil War. 

You are completely mistaken if you actually believe that "no Federal Constitution exists" simply because various hirelings dropped the ball, stopped providing services, were not retained, and so on.  

At the level of the Principals who created these contracts, they are still very much in play --- and it doesn't matter how many times the US INC. or the US CORP or the UNITED STATES or the USA, Inc. or the United States of America, Incorporated, or The United States of America, Incorporated, goes bankrupt or out of business.  

And as for  Oaths of Office, the Informer researched that 30 plus years ago and nothing has changed. 

Out of thousands of "oaths" and offices examined, exactly four people had oaths that met the requirements for a valid Oath of Public Office. This means that these people who are seeming to occupy these Public Offices are not actually seated in those Offices.  They are appearing to be Governors and Sheriffs and so on, and they are exercising the powers, but in actual fact, they have never accepted the liability attached to the job. 

This is just a small part of what has to be addressed, but if people like you continue to ignore, misinterpret, and mislead people who are already confused enough, that effort to clean this mess up just gets harder to do. 

Cease and desist.  The Oregon Assembly was duly called into Session in 2019.  You are eligible to join it, but not supplant it.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

What Richard Discovered --- What Kind of Common Law?

 By Anna Von Reitz

I wish to comment briefly on the use and misuse of the words "Common Law". 

I am told that by July 27th, the Military will invoke a National Emergency, and President Trump --- who is still President for their purposes, will use Continuance of Government (COG) provisions to arrest various criminals and return the police and judiciary officers to operating under Common Law. 

It is necessary to ask -- what kind of common law? 

Military Common Law is not, overall, a good thing, 

Many Americans hearing this rumor are encouraged and joyful, thinking that American Common Law is about to be restored, believing also that their American Federal Republic is going to be repopulated by people loyal to America.  

Don't just "believe".  Require proof.  

We've been fooled too many times by the charlatans and actors operating out of the District of Columbia

This current situation is just as likely to be an illegal imposition of Military Common Law, following or in tandem with an illegal occupation of our American Federal Republic by British Territorial Operatives disguised as Americans. 

Tories don't come with a label neatly typed across their foreheads.  They can appear to be just as American as you or I.  Like Ray Epps. They don't speak with English accents, but they are loyal to the British Empire and its government.  They come in many different kinds and colors.  All are destructive to our Government and our way of life.  

When you hear someone ranting about "our democracy" you know that  they are either ignorant as Pat's Pig, or they are blatantly promoting a form of foreign British Territorial Government best exemplified by the Raj in India.  

When you inquire more deeply, you will find that what Americans mistake as their government and their Presidents and Governors are anything but.  

The men and organizations that appear to be filling these functions and offices are in fact acting as foreign usurpers and Pretenders, though most of them have been born in this country and have at least pretended allegiance to it-----and virtually none of them have ever provided their required Oath of Office, so they haven't actually entered into any Public Office.  

All legitimate Public Oaths of Office including those required by the Constitutions must be written, witnessed, signed, and recorded in a place and by means accessible to the Public.  

Care to guess how many Oaths of Public Office we've found that meet those requirements --- out of thousands examined?  Four.  

These men and women have merely appeared to occupy a Public Office and have exercised the powers of our Public Offices as imposters. 

In my view, both of the Municipal Corporations headquartered in the District of Columbia have acted in Gross Breach of Trust and in Violation of their Commercial Service Contracts (the Constitutions).  That was our finding in 2014 and that is our finding still; though some corrective measures have been taken, the bulk of the errors and abuses remain. 

Forgive me if I view the Trump Advocates among us with a somewhat jaundiced complexion; in my view, Mr. Trump is an excellent business man and made many efforts in that domain that were practical and beneficial for this country overall --- however, I do not lose track of the fact that he is working for a foreign Municipal Corporation that is intent on maintaining its grip on this country, our natural resources, and our personal (as in corporate) assets. 

What better stunt than to let the other Municipal Corporation bear the brunt and blame, while they exercise military powers to maintain the Big Lie we've been living in?  

One must remember that the British Territorial Military, and especially the U.S. Army, have been in control of this Mess since April of 1863. All the lauds and all the blame belong to them.  And so does Mr. Trump. He's their man. Not ours. 

This may be difficult for most Americans to grasp, but our Military has been a prostitute -- a Mercenary Force for hire -- under the control of the British Territorial "United States" Government for many decades.  In my opinion, she's the Great Whore, drunk with the blood and wealth of nations.  

And the seven hills fit Washington, DC, just as well as Rome. 

I wish it wasn't so. 

Notice that a British Corporation, SERCO, is acting as the Paymaster for "our" Military.  That's not even possible in a sane world wherein our government is free and independent and sovereign.  

Consider also the long roster of men pretending to be our Diplomats, Executive Officers and Generals accepting Knighthoods from HRM Elizabeth II --- Henry Kissinger, George Herbert Walker Bush, General Norman Schwarzkopf, General Colin Powell?  Knights?  Really?

Do you imagine that these honors of the British Empire are bestowed without allegiances and quid pro quos?  

I certainly don't. 

So when you are promised "Common Law" from the American Raj, take care that it isn't simply the common Law of the Jungle known as Military Common Law, or British Common Law, or Territorial Common Law, or District Common Law, or, or, or --- because there is only one Common Law that satisfies us, and that is American Common Law. 

And if they announce a new "Federal Republic" and propose to take the reins of Delegated Powers bequeathed to our American Federal Republic --- look sharp.  Is that a British Territorial "Federal" Republic that I see?  

Or something recognizable as the product of our fifty nation-states and our States of the Union?  

All that glitters is not gold and words do not change actions. 

The British Government has earned its labels.  All of Africa calls them a "nation of thieves", and so do the Irish, the Indians of the Indian Subcontinent, and the Natives of our country as well.  Even Shakespeare refers to them as "perfidious Albion", so mark me well. 

If there is a Military Occupation, that's exactly what it is --- a foreign British Territorial Occupation using our own misled sons and daughters as a front to hide British Imperialism. 

If there is a new Federal Republic declared under Mr. Trump, look sharp and more than once. 

I see no movement on his part to protect or advocate the Reconstruction necessary to restore the actual American Federal Republic.  I wish I did, but I don't. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.