Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.


Wednesday, September 24, 2025

International Public Notice: Illegal "Civil War" Era Courts Still in Operation

 By Anna Von Reitz

It appears that there is no such court as the DISTRICT COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA established by any State of Alaska Constitution and no such court established by any State of Alaska Statute.  

Oh, my, oh, dear.... I have been misaddressed by an unknown, unauthorized "court"..... 

Could it be a "Commission" -- as in "Military Commission" Court of the kind set up and amended via the Act of March 9th 1867?  

Let's see: 

The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 established Radical Reconstruction by dividing the former Confederate states into five military districts under federal control, requiring them to draft new constitutions guaranteeing Black men the right to vote and ratify the Fourteenth Amendment to be readmitted to the Union. 

But, but, but.... we know that the same demands were made in the Northern States as well, where no such military commission ("carpetbagger") courts were supposed to exist, and which were not subject to any "radical reconstruction".  Our actual States of the Union always guaranteed all free Negroes the right to vote.  And, as we can demonstrate, although new Constitutions were forced, our States never did ratify the Fourteenth Amendment.  

What's going on, kids?   March 9th 1867 was the first day of Session for the 40th Congress,

Palaver about the details of the Reconstruction Acts was all that went on March 9th 1867 -- and the only Act passed by the U.S. Congress (British Territorial Rump Congress) that day was more like an Amendment to the First Reconstruction Act that passed earlier in the week.  

That after-thought allowed Persons employed by the British Territorial Corporations known as "de facto" government employees to occupy offices of the "de jure" government--- but, as the U.S. Supreme Court reminds us in Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886) -- such Persons couldn't just make up new offices for themselves that never existed in the de jure constitutional government. 

Quote: "...the acts of a person assuming to fill and perform the duties of an office which does not exist de jure can have no validity whatever in law." 

So, did the "Judiciary Courts of Alaska, Inc." just create a court out of thin air, and let their Persons occupy it without any statutory authority at all?  It appears so. 

We are told that the Alaska District Courts, which are not authorized in the Alaska Statute, either, are ---you guessed it --- United States COURTS and technically, don't exist in Alaska.  They are in the District of Alaska, instead:  
Location: James M. Fitzgerald U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building at 222 West 7th Avenue, room 229, Box/Suite #4. View map. Phone: 1-866-243-3814 toll free 

And, we are told they have jurisdiction over the following list of subject matter:

Judges in the Alaska District Court system:

  • Hear state misdemeanor cases, and cases regarding violations of city and borough ordinances
  • Issue summonses, arrest warrants and search warrants
  • Hear first appearances and preliminary hearings in felony cases
  • Record vital statistics (in some areas of the state)
  • Hear civil cases valued up to $100,000
  • Hear small claims case ($10,000 maximum)
  • Handle cases involving children on an emergency basis
  • Hear domestic violence cases[1]

We are told that Judges in the Alaska District Court hear cases regarding violations of city and borough ordinances..... but as we already know, statutes, codes, ordinances, and regulations only apply to "persons", not people.  

And what "State" are they talking about that was present in 1959 when these District of Alaska courts got started?  Oh, the Territorial State of Alaska.... remember?  Alaska entered Territorial "Statehood" in 1959 and couldn't be enrolled as a State of the Union because our States of the Union were not in Session to enroll Alaska at the time. 

So, we have nailed it down.  

I wasn't being addressed by any State of Alaska court authorized by the State of Alaska Constitution or defined in its State of Alaska Statutes; no, I was being addressed by a sneaky "federal" Military District Court operating in the "District of Alaska" --- an imaginary place that isn't supposed to exist in Alaska, and a different kind of "district" and a different kind of District Court entirely. 

That's why Governor Dunleavy's Office said my unlawful eviction wasn't a "State" matter, even though there were a dozen cruisers clearly marked "STATE OF ALASKA" parked in my driveway. 

Dunleavy and his Chief Justice are still responsible for hiring the Municipal Corporation Goons and letting them run rampant in Alaska, but at least we know whose leg to bite hardest --- the Provost Marshal General of the US Army.  

The "entity" responsible for the illegal confiscation of my private property is a quasi-military Carpetbagger court just like they used in the Southern States after the so-called Civil War.  

But it wasn't a war.  It was a Mercenary Conflict.  Remember?  No Congress declared any "war".  Oops.  

So no matter if they are running a State of Alaska District Court or a District of Alaska Court, they can spin the verbiage all day long and.... it doesn't matter what they try to concoct.  

They still have absolutely no jurisdiction over me or my physically surveyed property, especially since the "State" they were inhabiting got rolled over into Alaska, the State of the Union, as of October 1st 2020. And also since my expatriation under the Expatriation Act of 1868 has been tattooed on every Presidential butt since 1998. 

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.  NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS;' NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS. 

And you'd better all believe it.  

Issued by: 
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

September 23rd 2025

------------------
See this article and over 5500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

September 23rd 2025

 By Anna Von Reitz

Fall Equinox, always a turning point for our planet and our world of men, too.  

I received the equivalent of a nasty note from The Nevada Assembly indicating that they haven't been reading any of the recent articles I have posted nor these little personal daily updates to keep everyone informed about the current status of our developing situation. 

There's no excuse for complaining that you don't know what's going on when you have the International Proclamations and Notices and Criminal Informations on your computer and also have daily dispatches.   

If there is anyone in The Nevada Assembly who is totally illiterate, please help them and read the articles or summarize for them. 

There is serious work to be done and everyone reading this needs to be buckled down and doing it. 

I certainly am. 

I am gearing up to get an early start tomorrow on errands and then research --- which I am sure will turn up some fascinating results. 

What I am seeing so far are attempts to equivalence everything down to the State of Alaska, Inc.  If you search for "Alaska Constitution" or "Alaska State Constitution" all roads lead instead to the "State of Alaska Constitution" --- which as we know, is not the same thing at all. 

So where did the State Constitution go?  

The State of Alaska Constitution forms its Judiciary at Article IV, and Section 16 allows that "The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all courts".  

Now we know -- for sure -- who is responsible for their misadministration, too, at the State of State level.

This Article IV is then codified as State of Alaska Statutes Title 22, and in Chapter 15, Section 010 we find: 

"There is established a district court of the State of Alaska for each of the four judicial districts of the superior court of this state." 

Notice something strange? 

These four courts are supposed to be "district courts of the State of Alaska" -- not "DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA". 

It appears that there is no such court established by any State of Alaska Constitution and no such court established by any State of Alaska Statute.  

Oh, my, oh, dear.... I have been misaddressed by an unknown, unauthorized "court"..... 

Could it be a "Commission" -- as in "Military Commission" Court of the kind set up and amended via the Act of March 9th 1867?  

Let's see: 

The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 established Radical Reconstruction by dividing the former Confederate states into five military districts under federal control, requiring them to draft new constitutions guaranteeing Black men the right to vote and ratify the Fourteenth Amendment to be readmitted to the Union. 

But, but, but.... we know that the same demands were made in the Northern States as well, where no such military commission ("carpetbagger") courts were supposed to exist, and which were not subject to any "radical reconstruction".  Our actual States of the Union always guaranteed all free Negroes the right to vote.  And, as we can demonstrate, although new Constitutions were forced, our States never did ratify the Fourteenth Amendment.  

What's going on, kids?   March 9th 1867 was the first day of Session for the 40th Congress,

Palaver about the details of the Reconstruction Acts was all that went on March 9th 1867 -- and the only Act passed by the U.S. Congress (British Territorial Rump Congress) that day was more like an Amendment to the First Reconstruction Act that passed earlier in the week.  

That after-thought allowed Persons employed by the British Territorial Corporations known as "de facto" government employees to occupy offices of the "de jure" government--- but, as the U.S. Supreme Court reminds us in Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886) -- such Persons couldn't just make up new offices for themselves that never existed in the de jure constitutional government. 

Quote: "...the acts of a person assuming to fill and perform the duties of an office which does not exist de jure can have no validity whatever in law." 

So, did the "Judiciary Courts of Alaska, Inc." just create a court out of thin air, and let their Persons occupy it without any statutory authority at all?  It appears so. 

We are told that the Alaska District Courts, which are not authorized in the Alaska Statute, either, are ---you guessed it --- United States COURTS and technically, don't exist in Alaska.  They are in the District of Alaska, instead:  


Location: James M. Fitzgerald U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building at 222 West 7th Avenue, room 229, Box/Suite #4. View map. Phone: 1-866-243-3814 toll free 

And, we are told they have jurisdiction over the following list of subject matter:

Judges in the Alaska District Court system:

  • Hear state misdemeanor cases, and cases regarding violations of city and borough ordinances
  • Issue summonses, arrest warrants and search warrants
  • Hear first appearances and preliminary hearings in felony cases
  • Record vital statistics (in some areas of the state)
  • Hear civil cases valued up to $100,000
  • Hear small claims case ($10,000 maximum)
  • Handle cases involving children on an emergency basis
  • Hear domestic violence cases[1]

We are told that Judges in the Alaska District Court hear cases regarding violations of city and borough ordinances..... but as we already know, statutes, codes, ordinances, and regulations only apply to "persons", not people.  

And what "State" are they talking about that was present in 1959 when these District of Alaska courts got started?  Oh, the Territorial State of Alaska.... remember?  Alaska entered Territorial "Statehood" in 1959 and couldn't be enrolled as a State of the Union because our States of the Union were not in Session to enroll Alaska at the time. 

So, we have nailed it down.  

I wasn't being addressed by any State of Alaska court authorized by the State of Alaska Constitution or defined in its State of Alaska Statutes; no, I was being addressed by a sneaky "federal" military District Court operating in the "District of Alaska" --- a different kind of "district" and a different kind of District Court entirely. 

That's why Governor Dunleavy's Office said my unlawful eviction wasn't a state matter, even though there were a dozen cruisers clearly marked "STATE OF ALASKA" parked in my driveway. 

Dunleavy and his Chief Justice are still responsible for hiring the Municipal Goons and letting them run rampant in Alaska, but at least we know whose leg to bite hardest --- the Provost Marshal General of the US Army.  

The "entity" responsible for the illegal confiscation of my private property is a quasi-military Carpetbagger court just like they used in the Southern States after the so-called Civil War.  

But it wasn't a war.  It was a Mercenary Conflict.  

So no matter if they are running a State of Alaska District Court or a District of Alaska Court, they can spin the verbiage all day long and.... it doesn't matter what they try to concoct.  

They still have absolutely no jurisdiction over me or my physically surveyed property, especially since the "State" they were inhabiting got rolled over into Alaska, the State of the Union, as of October 1st 2020. And also since my expatriation under the Expatriation Act of 1868 has been tattooed on every Presidential butt since 1998. 

Granna

------------------
See this article and over 5500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Criminal Information Regarding the Great Fraud

 By Anna Von Reitz

Attention: Prosecutor Kahn, Registrar M. Gauthier: 

In 1863, Abraham Lincoln bankrupted the United States of America, Incorporated, a British Territorial business entity that was engaged in supporting the Northern Confederacy. He did this the day after he issued General Order 100, the Lieber Code, which provides directions to the U.S. Army regarding the management of the country after a military victory is achieved.  You can think of the Lieber Code as instructions for the peacetime occupation of the country; the Lieber Code has since been adopted with some amendments as the Hague Conventions that govern similar scenarios of post-war military occupations worldwide. 

So, here we are.  A British Territorial Congress is seated in Washington, DC.  Lee has surrendered.  The Lieber Code has been in effect for two years as a Commander-in-Chief directive to the U.S. Army.  The United States of America, Inc., Lincoln's British Territorial corporation that he was "President" of, is in the throes of bankruptcy.

Obviously, it's a priority for the British Territorial Congress to solve this bankruptcy issue, but they simply don't have the physical assets or labor assets to do so on their own, using British Territorial resources. 

When our American Government didn't immediately respond and take charge, they decided to take the initiative and declare a "state of emergency" and use this emergency as an excuse to continue a very quiet military occupation of the country. 

By 1868, they have hit upon a two-step process to latch onto American assets to pay their way out of bankruptcy and continue the military occupation indefinitely. 

In Scotland, they incorporate a new commercial corporation doing business as "The United States of America" ---Incorporated.  This new corporation publishes what is known as the Corporate Constitution; this document looks nearly identical to the already existing Constitution of the United States of America issued by our American Government in 1789, but it is a new contract to operate a new foreign incorporated entity merely calling itself "The United States of America" under the same basic provisions.

None of this is disclosed to the American Public and it is not widely distributed outside the District of Columbia.  In this way they substituted The United States of America, Inc. for the bankrupt entity doing business as "the United States of America" Incorporated.  The only noticeable difference between the new Scottish corporation and the old British Territorial corporation is the definite article "the", which is included as part of the name of the new Scottish corporation: The United States of America, Incorporated.

This new Scottish corporation just happens to bear the same exact name as our American unincorporated Federation of the States of the Union: The United States of America.

So, they basically stole the identity of our American Federation and used this new persona to access our credit assets. 

That was necessary to give them a new operating platform and funds to operate the British Territorial U.S. Government under the "new" corporate Constitution used as the Articles to charter the Scottish business entity dba "The United States of America, Inc.". 

As a corporation chartered in Scotland, The United States of America, Inc., operated under Scotland's version of Roman Civil Law, not American or even British Territorial Common Law, so this mandated a change in the Judicial system, too.

None of this was ever disclosed to the American Public.  Apologists claimed that this was an emergency – the same one declared by Lincoln -- and the "Law of Necessity" justified it.

In fact, their secretive actions precluded the American Government and the American People from acting or even knowing what the problem was.

This is how our British Federal Subcontractors rearranged things so that they could access American credit and presume upon American assets, without the Americans knowing a thing about it.

At the same time that this is going on, and within the framework of the pretended "emergency" and the supposed military occupation of the country, our British Federal Subcontractors now reorganized to function as a Scottish-chartered commercial corporation, conveniently assumed that everyone in this country was a Ward of the Queen and that we were de facto converted into British Territorial U.S. Citizens for the duration of the military occupation. 

So, the American known as Roy Anderson was unlawfully converted into a British Territorial Person operating under the same name, Roy Anderson.

This subjected Americans to the Scottish version of Roman Civil Law and established a Maritime authority in control of land and soil assets.

All this was done "in our names" without our knowledge and without our permission and with no actual authority granted to do any of this, all lacking full disclosure.  They couldn't subject Americans to the Scottish Maritime Law – a peculiar form of Roman Civil Law, but they could subject "Roy Anderson" the British Territorial Person to it. 

So in their wonky foreign Judicial System they simply presumed that any "Roy Anderson" they contacted was the British Territorial Person, and not the American. 

This initial illegal and undisclosed "latching upon" the American populace and the presumption that we were without a government and therefore "stateless" and available to salvage allowed the Perpetrators to unlawfully convert our political status to that of a British Territorial Person and allowed the British Monarchs to claim a public trust interest in our labor and our property. 

The U.S. Attorney General was established as Common Law Trustee of all these new and merely presumed to exist U.S. Citizens – the British "Persons" attached to every American and left functioning seamlessly and unseen and using our own Given Names.

All this shell game was calculated in secrecy and dependent on secrecy.  It was crucial that the American remain asleep and not discover the fraud this entire system is built upon. So that is what they did and have done for over a century and a half – kept it all secret in the interests of their British Territorial "National" Security Interest.

In the same year, 1868, they were forced to provide remedy for all this to legalize what was otherwise patently unlawful and illegal --- so the British Territorial Rump Congress passed the Expatriation Act of 1868 the day before they settled the bankruptcy of "the United States of America, Incorporated". 

This remains the remedy that the American Progeny are owed.  If our ancestors were already American State Nationals in 1868, we can expatriate from any presumption of British Territorial citizenship and any resulting citizenship obligations.

Of course, our ancestors weren't told a word about any of this cozy accommodation and so, never availed themselves of the ability to expatriate from these foreign citizenship presumptions and obligations and were not able to explain the situation to their sons and daughters, either.

Nonetheless, we are "grandfathered in" and must be, because otherwise the whole legalization scheme falls apart and their excuse – the idea that we "voluntarily" accepted British Territorial Subject status, also falls apart.

What good is a remedy kept secret from the Public it is supposedly provided to?  It's a "show" of remedy, without being a remedy in fact.  Millions of Americans were precluded from accessing the remedy provided by the Expatriation Act of 1868 by failure to disclose what was going on and failure to disclose the remedy to the American Public. 

It should not surprise us, given this background, that the Expatriation Act of 1868 is still in effect.  It says in part that expatriation is "a natural and inherent right of all people" and "that any declaration, instruction, opinion, order or decision of any officers of the government which restricts, impairs, or questions the right of expatriation, is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government."

It was and is an explicit rejection of the feudal common law principle of perpetual allegiance.

It is now codified as 8 USC 1481. 

It is the lynchpin upon which legalization of all this fraud depends, and ironically, also the only means of true remedy. 

Eligible Americans wishing to expatriate from presumption of British Territorial citizenship must specifically cite the Expatriation Act of 1868 and, in writing, present their claim of American State National status. 

At the beginning of this process there was no means to do this easily as our American Government had been out of Session for many years, but as the American State Assemblies have come back in Session and validated their members, State Credentials identifying Americans as Americans have been issued for the past five (5) years. 

Presentation of such a State Credential Card is a statement in writing invoking the Expatriation Act of 1868 and replying to the Expatriation Act of 1907 and Nationality Act of 1940 and Nationality Act of 1952, etc.

None of the subsequent Acts affecting the British Territorial Persons created by the presumption of British Territorial military occupation apply to Americans who expatriate under the Expatriation Act of 1868, which releases them from all presumptions – legal and otherwise – of British Territorial personhood and thereby acknowledges their political status as an American State National.

For the record, Americans acquire their nationality from their States and are known by their State demonyms as, for example, Wisconsinites, Ohioans, New Yorkers, Texans, etc.

The American Government is embodied by the State Assemblies of the living people at the County level and their Lawful Persons operating in international venues. 

All American levels of government and government institutions are unincorporated.

Obviously, our sovereign nation-states cannot be incorporated and the proper instrumentalities of our American Government known as The United States, representing the combined sovereign nation-states, and The United States of America, representing the combined States of the Union in international venues, cannot be incorporated, either. 

Having, by dint of secrecy, so far promoted an unlawful conversion of the American population to that of a British Territorial population, the Perpetrators got into trouble again and again, as the British Territorial Incorporated "Government" entities doing business under our names as the United States of America, Incorporated, and The United States of America, Incorporated, and later, the USA, Inc., and UNITED STATES, INC., and so on, repeatedly sought bankruptcy protection.

Each time they did this, their debts were "presumed" to be debts backed by the labor and assets of their British Territorial citizenry, but of course, they were presuming British Territorial citizenship obligations upon millions of Americans to pay these debts.

The scheme was expanded in the late 1930's with the surreptitious publication of The Declaration of Interdependence of the Governments in The United States and the Nationality Act of 1940 and the presumption of the Social Security Treaty on British Persons residing in The United States.

The first step involved presuming Roman Municipal citizenship, a status also known as "Fourteenth Amendment citizenship" or "citizen of the United States" status on the British Territorial Persons operated under the Given Names of Americans.  This created Federal Dual Citizenship obligations for the victims of this complex intergenerational fraud.

It also created another level of government and subjection to another form of foreign law – Roman Municipal Law was added to the Judicial framework and liberally misapplied to the clueless Americans. 

Whereas the British Territorial Persons operated under our Given Names were defined as franchisees of the British Territorial Government and were subject to the Scottish Maritime Law, which is a tweaked form of Roman Civil Law, the new Municipal franchise citizens were defined as Municipal Corporations and were operated under our names styled in all capital letters: ROY ADAM ANDERSON.   These Municipal PERSONS are operated under Roman Municipal Law.

The entire time that all this was going on, all these impersonations of Americans, all these "conferred" and "presumed" foreign citizenships and foreign citizenship obligations were being enforced under color of law against our people, and a venal web of foreign public trust interests was being imposed.

Finally, because of yet another foreign bankruptcy settlement, the British Territorial Person being operated under our Given Name was declared missing, lost at sea, presumed dead, so that only the Municipal PERSON operating as a "citizen of the United States" remained.

Without the British Person, there would be no Municipal PERSON, so when an American expatriates from the presumption of British Territorial Citizenship, they also collapse the Municipal ESTATE named after the "lost" British Territorial Seaman.

All these "impositions" and False Legal Presumptions were applied against individual Americans and against their labor and physical assets under color of law and conditions of non-disclosure. 

In truth, they are owed their estates back unharmed, together with the profit realized by the use of their assets and labor since 1868.

We are seeking recognition of this criminal circumstance impacting approximately 250 million Americans and prosecution under international law, returning all right, title, and interest to the individual Americans.

Whatever we need to do to arouse the conscience of the other nations, let it be known that we are not the only victims of this complex fraud amounting to a national-level identity theft scheme.

The British Homeland has also been similarly impacted, the former British Commonwealth has been impacted, the seventeen Western European counties that were occupied in the wake of the Second World War, Japan, and numerous other countries that have fallen under the sway of this venal system, and their people have all been similarly impersonated and victimized under color of law.

We call upon the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court to accept this information provided by individuals who have been attacked and robbed in violation of international law and we request the recognition of the facts, the actual standing and identity of the Americans and other nationalities who have been victims, and the punishment of the offending corporations both commercial and municipal that have used lawfare and legalities as a means to entrap, indenture, and enslave living people and Lawful Persons under color of law.

This testimony in the form of an affidavit is being provided to Prosecutor Kahn and the Registrar of the Court and to the General Public of the world by:   

                                                               

                                                          Anna Maria Riezinger – Fiduciary

                                                          The United States of America

                                                           In care of: Box 520994

                                                           Big Lake, Alaska 99652

September 24th 2025

Included attachment: Sample American State Credential Card

This example copy of the aforementioned American State Credential Card is provided for reference of law enforcement and peacekeeping forces.  People carrying this card have recognized the legalized fraud being operated against them and their Public Interest and are invoking the Expatriation Act of 1868 releasing them from any further presumptions of foreign citizenship. 

------------------
See this article and over 5500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

September 22nd 2025

 By Anna Von Reitz

Where I am staying during this time hasn't been lived in for a while so there are all sorts of odd issues to be addressed—- like no ice trays, burned out light bulbs, missing extension cords.... But bit by bit am getting it together and making it work.  Should be back in business by tomorrow afternoon.  


I have Jag attorneys and Army Officers assigned and we are about to go head to head with the forces of both ignorance and evil.  

I found my "FBI File" which details exactly what I sent them and when.  This should be interesting.  And damning in terms of both commercial and administrative default.  

There are several issues to be cleaned up off the public records, too, that are begging for attention. 

I am using this time to gather and organize all the pdf and photographed documents going back more than two decades.  

The central issue is that the whole Civil War narrative was and is false.  

It wasn't a war.  It was an illegal Mercenary Conflict. 
This led to illegal occupation and misadministration of the entire country.  That's Number One. 

Number Two is the Substitution Fraud Schemes — the substitution of deceptively named foreign commercial and municipal corporations for our actual government instrumentalities, and secondly, the theft of our individual identity via substitution and impersonation , followed by the theft of our property assets using public trust interest fraud. 

Number Three is the role of the Bar Associations in all of this.  

Heavy lifting, all of it.  

Granna