By Anna Von Reitz
Fall Equinox, always a turning point for our planet and our world of men, too.
I received the equivalent of a nasty note from The Nevada Assembly indicating that they haven't been reading any of the recent articles I have posted nor these little personal daily updates to keep everyone informed about the current status of our developing situation.
There's no excuse for complaining that you don't know what's going on when you have the International Proclamations and Notices and Criminal Informations on your computer and also have daily dispatches.
If there is anyone in The Nevada Assembly who is totally illiterate, please help them and read the articles or summarize for them.
There is serious work to be done and everyone reading this needs to be buckled down and doing it.
I certainly am.
I am gearing up to get an early start tomorrow on errands and then research --- which I am sure will turn up some fascinating results.
What I am seeing so far are attempts to equivalence everything down to the State of Alaska, Inc. If you search for "Alaska Constitution" or "Alaska State Constitution" all roads lead instead to the "State of Alaska Constitution" --- which as we know, is not the same thing at all.
So where did the State Constitution go?
The State of Alaska Constitution forms its Judiciary at Article IV, and Section 16 allows that "The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all courts".
Now we know -- for sure -- who is responsible for their misadministration, too, at the State of State level.
This Article IV is then codified as State of Alaska Statutes Title 22, and in Chapter 15, Section 010 we find:
"There is established a district court of the State of Alaska for each of the four judicial districts of the superior court of this state."
Notice something strange?
These four courts are supposed to be "district courts of the State of Alaska" -- not "DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA".
It appears that there is no such court established by any State of Alaska Constitution and no such court established by any State of Alaska Statute.
Oh, my, oh, dear.... I have been misaddressed by an unknown, unauthorized "court".....
Could it be a "Commission" -- as in "Military Commission" Court of the kind set up and amended via the Act of March 9th 1867?
Let's see:
The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 established Radical Reconstruction by dividing the former Confederate states into five military districts under federal control, requiring them to draft new constitutions guaranteeing Black men the right to vote and ratify the Fourteenth Amendment to be readmitted to the Union.
But, but, but.... we know that the same demands were made in the Northern States as well, where no such military commission ("carpetbagger") courts were supposed to exist, and which were not subject to any "radical reconstruction". Our actual States of the Union always guaranteed all free Negroes the right to vote. And, as we can demonstrate, although new Constitutions were forced, our States never did ratify the Fourteenth Amendment.
What's going on, kids? March 9th 1867 was the first day of Session for the 40th Congress,
Palaver about the details of the Reconstruction Acts was all that went on March 9th 1867 -- and the only Act passed by the U.S. Congress (British Territorial Rump Congress) that day was more like an Amendment to the First Reconstruction Act that passed earlier in the week.
That after-thought allowed Persons employed by the British Territorial Corporations known as "de facto" government employees to occupy offices of the "de jure" government--- but, as the U.S. Supreme Court reminds us in Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886) -- such Persons couldn't just make up new offices for themselves that never existed in the de jure constitutional government.
Quote: "...the acts of a person assuming to fill and perform the duties of an office which does not exist de jure can have no validity whatever in law."
So, did the "Judiciary Courts of Alaska, Inc." just create a court out of thin air, and let their Persons occupy it without any statutory authority at all? It appears so.
We are told that the Alaska District Courts, which are not authorized in the Alaska Statute, either, are ---you guessed it --- United States COURTS and technically, don't exist in Alaska. They are in the District of Alaska, instead:
Location: James M. Fitzgerald U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building at 222 West 7th Avenue, room 229, Box/Suite #4. View map. Phone: 1-866-243-3814 toll free
And, we are told they have jurisdiction over the following list of subject matter:
Judges in the Alaska District Court system:
- Hear state misdemeanor cases, and cases regarding violations of city and borough ordinances
- Issue summonses, arrest warrants and search warrants
- Hear first appearances and preliminary hearings in felony cases
- Record vital statistics (in some areas of the state)
- Hear civil cases valued up to $100,000
- Hear small claims case ($10,000 maximum)
- Handle cases involving children on an emergency basis
- Hear domestic violence cases[1]
We are told that Judges in the Alaska District Court hear cases regarding violations of city and borough ordinances..... but as we already know, statutes, codes, ordinances, and regulations only apply to "persons", not people.
And what "State" are they talking about that was present in 1959 when these District of Alaska courts got started? Oh, the Territorial State of Alaska.... remember? Alaska entered Territorial "Statehood" in 1959 and couldn't be enrolled as a State of the Union because our States of the Union were not in Session to enroll Alaska at the time.
So, we have nailed it down.
I wasn't being addressed by any State of Alaska court authorized by the State of Alaska Constitution or defined in its State of Alaska Statutes; no, I was being addressed by a sneaky "federal" military District Court operating in the "District of Alaska" --- a different kind of "district" and a different kind of District Court entirely.
That's why Governor Dunleavy's Office said my unlawful eviction wasn't a state matter, even though there were a dozen cruisers clearly marked "STATE OF ALASKA" parked in my driveway.
Dunleavy and his Chief Justice are still responsible for hiring the Municipal Goons and letting them run rampant in Alaska, but at least we know whose leg to bite hardest --- the Provost Marshal General of the US Army.
The "entity" responsible for the illegal confiscation of my private property is a quasi-military Carpetbagger court just like they used in the Southern States after the so-called Civil War.
But it wasn't a war. It was a Mercenary Conflict.
So no matter if they are running a State of Alaska District Court or a District of Alaska Court, they can spin the verbiage all day long and.... it doesn't matter what they try to concoct.
They still have absolutely no jurisdiction over me or my physically surveyed property, especially since the "State" they were inhabiting got rolled over into Alaska, the State of the Union, as of October 1st 2020. And also since my expatriation under the Expatriation Act of 1868 has been tattooed on every Presidential butt since 1998.
Granna
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
