by Anna Von Reitz
I have a good friend whose integrity I respect highly and whose information is always solid.
He has investigated the known mass murderers, assassins, and gun-violence
terrorists in recent years and with one exception----and it's a long
list----they were all Democrats.
Now, it has been a big question in my mind for years why the Democratic
Party has been calling for "gun control", when it is clear that our Constitution
requires an active militia and guarantees our right to keep and bear arms----and
it is also apparent that guns are not the problem.
I have watched guns for sixty years: rifles, pistols, Uzzis and submachine
guns in general, air rifles, AK47s, 911s, 50 mm sniper rifles, elephant guns,
shot guns, little bitty two shot Derringers, you name it, I've observed them
lying on logs, perched on tables, snugged down in gun cabinets, tucked behind
doors, over doors, carried in holsters and backpacks and purses---- and I have
never once seen a gun move by itself. Ever. Not as much as a quarter of an
inch. So why would they need to be controlled?
