By Anna Von Reitz
This isn't anything hard to explain or difficult to see. It says, plainly, that I am acting as a "Private Attorney" for Pope Benedict XVI.
Where does this say or imply that I ever worked for "the Vatican"?
More obfuscation and misrepresentation on your part, not mine.
Acting as a private attorney for someone, for example, Donald Trump, does not imply working for the Department of Administration --- which you, Richard, actually did. Not me.
Acting as a private attorney for someone, for example, Donald Trump, does not imply working for the Department of Administration --- which you, Richard, actually did. Not me.
After all, I am the one who published the records you are "exposing" and the exact circumstance was "exposed" at the same time.
Everyone is advised to run-not-walk to get a copy of my book, "Disclosure 101" ---available on Amazon
for the past several years, so that they might get an inkling of how much work has gone into dismantling
the crime syndicates responsible for the embezzlement that occurred on Richard's watch.
I am not made into a criminal or Bad Guy for exposing and opposing crime, and neither is Pope Benedict.
You, however, were in a critical position of public trust in this country and you just sat there for decades doing nothing about the obvious embezzlement and the withholding of credit owed to average Americans. In fact, just recently, you expressed support for the generation skipping trust scheme as a way to avoid taxes.
And why would average Americans be interested in avoiding taxes they don't owe?
This can only be accounted for as gross stupidity or gross dishonesty on your part, Richard. If I were you, I'd sit down and shut up and hope and pray to God --- the True God --- that all those Rotarians don't catch on to what you were expediting against them.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2100 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
So, is/was Benedict a 'good' guy in that regard? And this is why Jewsuits forced Benedict out (tho still employed) to put their Jewsuit Bergoglio in, to cease the remedy? We think so.
ReplyDeleteThus, doesn't it also suggest not all popes, thus not whole Catholic Church, but individuals are the problem? 1962 Vatican II Swissy-jew-coup. The Lateran Treaty of 1929 creating political city-state Vatican City w Holy See full ownership, dominion & sovereign authority and jurisdiction, & for Catholics, Christians to separate from Rome to find another unity. Well, it isn't that old, not that long ago at all.
Pardon our upset of historical narrative, as we're really tying to figure this out w a new-take on known false history & really fake, sloppy historical timeline. Its things as this which keep pushing the timeline balloon back up to a much more recent timeframe.
We're not convinced all the popes really existed as said, thus, their said actions. Just as all those King Louis' didn't exist, but inserted as time-filler, just as their Dark Ages didn't exist at all. Antiquity is really the Middle Ages. Fake historical timeline extended 1000+- yrs, true timeline is much shorter.
Could cracking their fake timeline, crack 'it' open? Add that the entire jew history was concocted mid 1800's, no such history at all. Not a mere coincidence, but the cause, the destructive force behind evisceration of all that is good aka Christ followers.
Why such an explosively heinously evil attack by 30,000 Brooklyn jew Bolsheviks upon Great White Christian Russia like a ravenous satanic vermin genocide pact, & its emerging destruction of European White Christ followers?
In said late 1500-early 1600 jew jewsuit Protestant Scaliger rewrote history, adding 1000+- yrs & its this fraudulent Scaligerian timeline we follow today. PROVEN FAKE HISTORY w fake characters, fake events. Many events said occurred hundreds of years apart are much closer, some nearly simultaneous.
From Fomenko's mathematically & astrologically corrected historical timeline: http://chronologia.org/en/index.html :
http://chronologia.org/en/how_it_was/06_01.html 2. THE REVOLT-REFORMATION IN WESTERN EUROPE.
In the second half of the XVI century in Europe the governors who do not wish to obey the distant czar-khan of Veliky Novgorod form a rebellion. They seek independence. The banner of religious separation from the Empire was chosen as the ideological basis of the revolt. The rebels-protestants took advantage of the emergence of Lutheranism in the West as a just cause for political separation. Martin Luther himself was most likely a purely religious reformer and loyal subject of the 'Mongol' Empire.
'The Reformation … is one of the major events in world history, the name of which was used to symbolize the whole period of the new era spanning the 16th and the first half of the 17th century'[936], v.2, p.471. As a religious motto the reformists chose Lutheranism. In Russia it was called the heresy of the Judaizers..."
Hope this makes sense. thanks & stay sane