Already Gone

 By Anna Von Reitz

"So often-times it happens that we live our lives in chains, and we never even know we have the key...."

My employees telling me what to do and how to live? Not.

Forced medical procedures ordered by the "President" of a foreign commercial corporation? Not.

IRS collecting "income taxes" under the Spanish Law of the Inquisition? Not.

"Pope" Francis (or was that Francis Pope?) reserving Heaven for people who accept life as genetically defiled Trans-human slaves? Not.

Lawyers cobbling up new styles of names like StephenJAMES for these GMO Trans-humans? Not.

"President" Biden issuing unconstitutional health mandates and trying to enforce them? Not.

"Queen" Elizabeth II who abdicated her throne three days after she took her Coronation Oath saying anything at all? Not.

( A Public Apology for the past 68 years would have been nice, but oh, well.)

With respect to these issues and these leaders and a whole lot more, just color me "Already Gone" and back home, standing on my own two feet and on my own ground. Care to join me?

Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net

----------------------------

See this article and over 3300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Which "Original" Jurisdiction?

 By Anna Von Reitz

Discussing "original jurisdiction" with people is difficult, because that phrase can mean different things to different people, depending on their political status.

For Americans who derive their political status from The Declaration of Independence, original jurisdiction is held by the States of the Union and their Federation of States. That's our "original jurisdiction".

For U.S. Citizens and citizens of the United States --- all denizens of the District of Columbia, the phrase "original jurisdiction" refers to the jurisdiction of the Federal Republic spelled out in The Constitution for the united States of America (1787). That is their "original jurisdiction".

As a result of this conundrum it's always necessary to ask yourself --- which original jurisdiction are we talking about? Just as it is necessary to ask -- which United States? And, are you talking about a Federation State or a Confederate "State"?

One of the interesting facets of our original jurisdiction as Americans is that we have our own separate court system, and that is where our "one supreme court" ---- a jury of our peers --- is established.

The Federale's original jurisdiction referring to the first "federal jurisdiction" granted to the American Federal Republic in 1787, is a completely different thing. The Federal District Government operates entirely in foreign jurisdiction and their original jurisdiction (one of three) is no different in that respect.

We can reach and invoke our original jurisdiction as Americans easily enough, but, until we finish Reconstruction of both the American Confederation and the Federal Republic, the inhabitants of the District of Columbia are left without access to theirs.

Like everything else that got bungled up and left hanging after the so-called Civil War, the Federal Republic authorized by The Constitution for the united States of America --- that is, the "original jurisdiction" of the District Government --- has been inoperable for 160 years.

Read that --- the American "original jurisdiction" is still alive and well and in operation today, but the "original jurisdiction" of the District of Columbia Government is defunct, waiting for the States of the Union to reconstruct the Confederation and then waiting some more for the Confederation to reconstruct the Federal Republic.

The only lawful short-cut around this time consuming process of reconstruction would be for the Federation of States to reboot and operate the Federal Republic, an action which would restore the "original jurisdiction" of the District Government and help get things back on track.

In this as in all other areas where the same word or phrase is used to describe radically dissimilar things we have to test the context and know whether we are talking about American original jurisdiction, or Federal original jurisdiction.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Shine the Light on the Police and the Courts

 By Anna Von Reitz

Recently, Dr. David Martin electrified a crowd at the "Red Pill Expo" by observing the difference between "vaccine" and "bioweapon" and the need to use the right words.

Here's another good example--- the difference between "policeman" (or "patrolman") and "peace officer"--- and a demonstration of exactly why the difference is of crucial importance.

A policeman is hired by a corporation; he serves as "private security personnel" for that corporation. He is there to obey the corporation's private by-laws and public policies--- and to enforce those by-laws and policies.

A peace officer, by comparison, is hired by an unincorporated government as an Officer of the Law. He is there to obey and enforce the Public Law. A peace officer owes a duty to serve the Public.

Here's a note I got from Ed J. recently:

"Police are government workers, salaries paid from government coffers — tax dollars and, yes, fines, sanctions, penalties, fees, and surcharges. Most people think that the police have an obligation (“duty”) to protect the citizens in the jurisdictions they serve. Many police forces even have a motto along the lines of “To Protect and Serve.” The unfortunate reality is that the police are under no obligation to protect you. The police do not even have an obligation to respond to your call for help.

The most well-known case on this topic is Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981).

In short, four women lived in a boarding house. One lived on the 2nd floor with her 4 year old daughter, and two lived on the third floor.

Two men broke into the house and proceeded to assault and rape the woman on the second floor. The women on the third floor, hearing the screaming and cries from the floor below, called the police and were assured help was on the way, only to watch the police drive by the house, knock on the door and leave when no one answered.

The two women on the third floor then called the police (again) and were assured (again) that help was on the way.

The police never came, but thinking the police might be in the house, the two women called out to the third woman being assaulted. This resulted in the two assailants becoming aware of the other women in the house. The assailants proceeded to kidnap the three adult women at knife point and rape and beat them for the next 14 hours.

The three women sued the District of Columbia based on numerous failures of the police department in this event, but their case was dismissed at the trial court level. The Supreme Court of the United States explained that it is a “fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen.”

If the police have no duty or obligation to protect citizens, what is their purpose?"

That's Ed J's $100,000.00 question....

....and my answer:

Even though police working for an incorporated County or State-of-State organization are being paid for with tax money, they owe no "necessary duty" to the Public. They are police. They work in a private capacity for a private corporation. It's right there in the definition of "police" if anyone bothered to look.

The fact that these things operating "as" county and state-of-state governments are nothing but commercial corporations like any other commercial corporation is also on public display and fully admitted by Federal Titles 5 and 22.

I also want to draw your attention to the deceitful nature of the court's decision and it's coded meaning --- take a look at it again:

[It is a] “fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen.”

Actually, this garbage isn't a fundamental principle of "American" law, it's a fundamental principle of British corporate law.

And the "government and its agents" in this case aren't actually a government at all. They are undeclared foreign agents working for commercial corporations that are posing as "representatives" of our lawful government.

Finally, note the words "individual citizen" ---- the rats don't owe and don't provide protection to their own "citizens", including their own employees, but they are obligated to protect you, if you are an American.

Problem is, they claim that you are one of their citizens, and not an American. And you have never done anything to rebut this presumption.

So they just gratuitously do nothing much to protect anyone other than themselves, and misuse the police as undeclared revenue agents instead of protecting the Public Interest.

By now, you should have been scratching your head and wondering, hey, when did any commercial corporation have the power to tax me? And the answer is never.

Commercial corporations have no power to tax anyone, but they can act under color of law and pretend that they have the powers of government, if you let them.

A good many people reading this will have their jaws agape, trying to take it in, but this is nothing new. This is the way that the Rotters have been operating ever since the Civil War, it's simply gotten more blatant.

Now that you have gotten a clear picture of the difference between "police" and "peace officers" you are also better prepared to understand the Supreme Court's findings in Mack and Prinz v. USA, Inc., in which the court ruled that Sheriffs may use their own "discretion" as to whether or not they enforce the Constitution and provide constitutional guarantees.

Because virtually all the Sheriffs now working in the United States are working for incorporated "Counties" and not for the unincorporated government, they are police agents, not peace officers by definition.

So, as in the Warren v. District of Columbia case discussed above, the Supreme Court affirmed that the "Sheriffs" operating as policemen owe no general duty to the public, and don't need to enforce the Public Law.

So now you have a bird's eye view of why the police are so corrupt and why the streets are unsafe and why your Constitutional Guarantees languish without enforcement: lack of real peace officers.

We are beginning to address this problem along with many others, but in order for us to be effective and protected while we grapple with issues like these, it's necessary to reclaim and assert your birthright political status as an American.

Declaring and recording your choice of political status puts an end to any plausible deniability or excuse for treating you as a corporate "citizen".

That's Job One.

After that, it's time to join with other like-minded Americans in your State Assembly, get organized, and elect actual Sheriffs and Deputies to peacekeeping offices.

Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net.

Many of you were shocked today that the Appeals Courts overturned "President" Biden's Vaccine Mandates as unconstitutional and unenforceable.

You were also surprised when he came out in public and said that businesses should obey his mandates even though they are unconstitutional.

All that "President" Biden is president of is a foreign commercial corporation, so he has no general duty to the Public and no authority, either.

He's just a political hack acting in a private capacity, like the police, with no more authority than the "President" of Exxon. He believes that obeying or not obeying the Constitution is "discretionary" on his part, in exactly the same way.

This is when all the members of the Armed Forces should remember their Oath to protect and defend the Constitution from all Enemies both foreign and domestic --- because, with respect to them and their District Government, Joe Biden has flagged himself as a domestic threat.

He may owe no general duty to the Constitution, and he may ignore it at his own discretion, but the rest of us have a Public Duty to enforce the Constitution and its Guarantees.

And it's high time we got down to it.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The vaccinated are DROPPING DEAD in plain view as Fauci and the media admit total vax FAILURE…

 while pimping more booster shots for the gullible

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-11-15-the-vaccinated-are-dropping-dead-in-plain-view-as-fauci-and-the-media-admit-total-vax-failure.html

(Natural News) It’s now official: Tony Fauci has admitted that vaccines aren’t working and that vaccinated people of every age are getting sick and dying. His exact quote from a New York Times podcast on Nov. 12th, as reported by Yahoo News:

They are seeing a waning of immunity not only against infection but against hospitalization and to some extent death, which is starting to now involve all age groups. It isn’t just the elderly…

It’s waning to the point that you’re seeing more and more people getting breakthrough infections, and more and more of those people who are getting breakthrough infections are winding up in the hospital.

Read the entire article here: 

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-11-15-the-vaccinated-are-dropping-dead-in-plain-view-as-fauci-and-the-media-admit-total-vax-failure.html

Dr. Judy Mikovits lays it all out

 So clear, such perspective.  Plus DIY maintenance and recovery for the jabbed and injured.

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/judy-mikovits-phd-antidote-for-vaccine-toxin-and-warns-against-dangerous-fake-one/

For more from Dr. Judy Mikovits: 

https://rumble.com/search/video?q=dr.%20judy%20mikovits

Killing YOU to Protect You

 By Anna Von Reitz

This afternoon, we are waiting for the verdict in the infamous Kyle Rittenhouse trial. 

Most Americans are snorting and scoffing, thinking, "Of course, he's innocent.  A man has a right to defend his own life in this country."  

Most won't understand if this jury in Wisconsin comes back and convicts Kyle Rittenhouse. 

But, that can happen and it can happen easily. 

How? 

Well, I don't have a crystal ball, because I don't have the Docket Sheet in front of me, but I can tell you this --- if they are prosecuting KYLE RITTENHOUSE, his goose is cooked and ready for a fork. 

Because KYLE RITTENHOUSE is a Municipal Corporation and Municipal Corporations, like other citizens of the United States, are guilty of whatever crimes are alleged against them by definition.  They have no right to protect themselves.  They are slaves. 

Just read the infamous Territorial Corporation's Fourteenth Amendment to The Constitution of the United States of America (Incorporated).  

Those are the Legal Presumptions they have been operating under since the Civil War. See Section 2?  See Section 4?  

Not that the Fourteenth Amendment was ever ratified by our States of the Union.  Not that it has any lawful authority whatsoever.  

But in a private law slugfest, it is set in cement, and both the guilty Territorial Corporation and the guilty parent Municipal CORPORATIONS benefit from this.  

By getting an American in the middle of their phony baloney 'court" and batting him back and forth like a ball, deliberately impersonating him and misidentifying him as they go, they are guaranteed a 96% conviction rate and a free pass to jail him and fine him and steal his assets.. 

Then split the take. 

If the court prosecutes him as KYLE RITTENHOUSE, he's guilty by definition.  If they prosecute him as Kyle Rittenhouse, he's a British sailor of some sort, subject to the Queen and being prosecuted for crimes in the Admiralty jurisdiction.  

Either way, his identity as a plain old American owed the guarantees of the Constitutions won't be recognized. 

And absent action on his part to declare and record his status as an American, it can't be recognized. Even if he declares and records his actual political status, he will have to tenaciously and consistently defend his position and bring plenty of witnesses with him.

Absent action by a lot of other Americans, we are left dependent on the moral conscience of British Hired Jurists, who depend on convicting people "as" persons to make a living and bulk up their own retirement accounts.  

Guess who loses?  

If Kyle Rittenhouse were a member of The Wisconsin Assembly and a bunch of his peers showed up at his trial to take notes and names, the judge would think twice, and so would the jury.  

Otherwise, the ugly truth is that the U.S. "War on Terror" targets its own citizens --- or to be more exact, Americans who are presumed to be "citizens".  

Here's a pretty good explanation of the scam: https://www.rt.com/usa/540255-glenn-greenwald-911-capitol-investigation/

----------------------------

See this article and over 3300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Protecting You From Yourself

 By Anna Von Reitz

There are, last time I looked, over fifty "agencies" in the business of protecting you from yourself.  They will gladly shoot and kill you, frame you for felony level crimes, and concoct all manner of Big Lies to do so.  

These agencies come in both Municipal Government and Territorial Government flavors, and they each have their own oddball expertise.  Some of them come in pairs, like the Internal Revenue Service (Territorial) and the IRS (Municipal), or the Federal Bureau of Investigation(Territorial) and the FBI (Municipal).  

This is what happens when you leave foreign contractors in charge of your government for 160 years, in case anyone wants to know.  The Americans have proof. 

Protecting you from yourself is big business with billions upon billions being spent on it each year. 

It is also crucial to another program goal --- keeping you barefoot and pregnant and tied down at the farm, stuck in a dead end job, working your little heart out for The Company Store.  

Never mind that you actually own The Company Store and the middlemen operating it "for" you kinda conveniently forgot that fact.  

During the Wounded Knee Stand-Off between the Federales and the Native Leaders who led the protest, agents of the FBI got into the compound perimeter and installed a gun cache of "illegal weapons" ---- they have plenty of them that they confiscate from real crooks and sell to the Mexican Drug Cartels.    

So here the amazed Native Leaders are, being accused of being violent armed insurrectionists based on guns they know nothing about.  

This is a process of planting false evidence called "framing" someone for a crime.  They deliberately make it look like you did something criminal, when you didn't. 

The same parties did the same thing to our Utah Assembly Coordinator early on.  They came onto a remote corner of her property and installed a gun bunker, and they placed their snipers, and they sat down and waited. 

All that had to happen was for her to notice that something was going on in her back forty, go out there to check it out, and bam!   

They would have shot her to shut her up and then come after the whole Utah Assembly, accusing them of being armed insurrectionists.  

So we dissolved the first Utah Assembly and removed her as Coordinator to protect her from any further endangerment.  

That's just one example of the Dirty Tricks Squad at work. 

Then we had the whole Dingus Incident, where one of their guys got in the back door and started forming an illegal "national" security force and violating the "well-regulated militia" provisions, with the support of another clueless Coordinator in Texas.  

Had to shut that down for the same basic reasons.  The Feds would have used wrong-doing in Texas to paint all the Assemblies  as "armed insurrectionist organizations" and "domestic terrorists".  

Now we've got former Coordinators in California trying to redefine California as something other than a State of the Union and wiggling around trying to avoid oversight by the Federation of States.  Some of those folks have advocated splitting California up into pieces.  Others have advocated annexing Mexico,  or, alternatively, making California part of Mexico, if you can believe that.   Others have been preaching about an "independent" California --- that is, California as a separate country. 

Let's be very clear --- all those actions are illegal.  

Nothing like that should ever be promoted by anyone in any of our Assemblies.  

We are here to restore our lawful government, and all the above actions seek to destroy our lawful government in California.  Go figure. 

Part of the Assembly in California just lost its mind and went AWOL, still claiming to be part of our lawful Assembly, despite being engaged in trying to substitute something else for our State of the Union. 

Where have we seen that before?  

Oh, yes, when they substituted their Territorial State of State organizations for our American State of State organizations right after the Civil War.... 

Here they are, at it again, trying to substitute "something else" for California. 

So, we wash our hands of them and their agenda, and we carry on.  

It's not bad enough that we have all the work and responsibilities of the government thrust upon us, we have to put up with this kind of interference and undermining and constant flak,flak, flak, too.  

Last night, I got a message from a disgruntled woman who asked, basically, how can anything you are doing work?  They have the guns..... 

And I replied.  

They only provide governmental services because they get paid for doing so.  Cut off their access to our credit, and refuse to give them a contract, and guess what?  

Well, then, Washington, DC gets boarded up and vacated and starts to stink like an abandoned slaughterhouse ----precisely what is happening there right now.  And the whole District of Columbia government, which was always a foreign operation, starts to fade away. 

The actual American Government comes back into view. 

We've got a hundred and sixty years of graft and corruption to clean up.  There's nobody here to do the job but me and you.  

Joe Biden just hired 150,000 IRS agents to chase down imaginary Municipal CITIZENS. 

We just impounded and fined them for misaddressing average Americans.  

The poppy fields in Afghanistan got shut down. 

The adrenochrome factories got shut down. 

Big Pharma is next. 

What's not to like about this?  Sure, it's scary, but it's right.  And it has to be done. 

As we keep them from using (and abusing) our credit, we regain access to our own assets, so there will be plenty of money to provide government services. We just have to convince the U.S. Military that the long, long mercenary "war" is over.  And we are not the Enemy. 

We are their long-lost Employers. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 3300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Sunday Sermon • 25th Sunday after Pentecost • 2021

 https://youtu.be/A0Bbg9-9WLA

Sunday Sermon • 24th Sunday after Pentecost • 2021 - Fr. Martin Skierka

https://youtu.be/rg6BTqv6BII

A Pernicious Idea

 By Anna Von Reitz

A couple weeks ago, a man contacted me, and after a long complaint about everything under the sun, he made a strange remark --- he said that some people in The Texas Assembly told him (a wealthy man with good contacts) that he could "take" Texas.

I raised an eyebrow.

Take Texas?

I'm sorry. Texas is already taken by millions of Texans who live there. And if there ever was any question about that, it has been resolved in their favor for over a decade, as a result of action taken by the Federation of States.

Still, he persisted. He was given information to the effect that a guy with a few million dollars to spend could "take" Texas, that is, own and control it.

And who were these people?

Dissident members of The Texas Assembly who were also talking trash about the Federation and Federation oversight of the Assembly Process.

They were urging him on, encouraging him to join the Assembly and bowl it over with his money --- and they apparently thought that the people of Texas were weak-minded, lazy, ignorant, and ready for the picking.

My other eyebrow went up.

That's not the people of Texas I know.

I was already sorta pitying the Flat Ass who tried to take as much as a cactus from them and otherwise letting my mind wander before I said, "Well, that's very interesting, but Texas was reclaimed for the people who live there and there is a substantial population there now that would disagree with any attempt to "take" Texas."

But I wondered about that call. He was tipping me off. Letting me know that a move was on, from inside The Texas Assembly, to solicit corporate investors to come in and knock it off and share the spoils.

At least some people in The Texas Assembly were evidently no-good crooks who thought they saw an opportunity to enrich themselves at the expense of other Texans. They were actively going out to potential investors trying to sell this Golden Opportunity.

I later found out that the Ringleaders pushing this idea to these investors were connected to MI6 front organizations that have been trying their darndest to both compete with The American States Assembly for support, and, trying to pull off the same credit fraud scheme that the Brits pulled back in 1868 ---- incorporate a dummy commercial corporation calling itself "The United States of America --- Incorporated" and use it to impersonate us and gain access to our credit.

Just picture your old Granny standing behind the refrigerator with her eye on the Cookie Jar and a big old-fashioned Fly Swatter in her hand, ready to jump out on Junior and make him regret being born.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Tories Didn't Leave

 By Anna Von Reitz

Of all the points and educational information that we have tried to convey, this point is dropping through the cracks. Please stop long enough to consider HOW the British Territorial Government managed to weasel in the back door and set up the "American Raj" and use it to pillage six generations of Americans.

The short answer is that the Tories --- British Sympathizers in The War of Independence --- never left here after the war. They stayed on as providers of 'essential government services" --- see Article IV of all three Federal Constitutions. This gave them an insider position in our fledgling government, and despite the severely limited powers they were granted, it offered a place they used to plot, scheme, undermine, and ultimately, defraud, the unwary Americans.

To promote peace and heal the wounds of eight years of toe-to-toe conflict, the British Tories were largely allowed to retain all their businesses and assets and bank accounts and "titles" held to their land prior to the war. They were recognized as British Subjects, too. A condition of Dual Citizenship was established to accommodate them.

The British Government recognized the former "Loyal Colonials" as British Commonwealth Citizens known as U.S. Citizens.

The only two things to have changed about this situation in over two hundred years are:

(1) Originally, these British Territorial Citizens were considered to be Dual Citizens with American Citizenship being the second form of citizenship involved; this changed in 1937 after "The Declaration of Interdependence of the Governments in The United States" was adopted and U.S. Citizens were thereafter deemed to be dual citizens of both the British Commonwealth and the Municipal United States Government. They were henceforth operating as U.S. Citizens and citizens of the United States, both.

(2) In the 1960's, forced to make changes as a result of the rising recognition of the evils of Colonialism, the U.S. Citizenship was redefined from being a British Commonwealth citizenship to being a British Territorial citizenship --- by a process of default.

The British Government and the Queen received a great deal of approbation and support for this peaceful surrender of colonial interest in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and other "former" Commonwealth nations at the time..... however, the British Government and the Government of Westminster were playing a dirty, dirty game.

They made the big announcements, opened the gates, and the bewildered people of the "former" Commonwealth countries shrugged and went right on without a clue that they were supposed to organize their own truly independent government.

The British interests willingly provided an "interim" government so nothing much seemed to change, but when the "former" Commonwealth countries failed to organize a new government for themselves, the same British interests settled in as an emergency military government occupying the "abandoned" British Commonwealth, and everyone in the countries affected was "presumed" to be a Ward of the Queen and the British Crown and a Territorial Subject.

The difference between a British Colonial Citizenship and a British Territorial Citizenship is the difference between living under a peaceful civilian government and a foreign military occupation.

This is the same basic trick that was used 100 years earlier in America, wherein the Brits established a British Territorial Military Dictatorship and claimed a custodial interest in all the land and assets of their "absent" American Employers. As a result of this British Bunko, Americans were left completely uninformed about the circumstance, and their political status was unlawfully converted to that of "presumed" British Territorial United States Citizens --- U.S. Citizens.

All these actions served to tighten the coils of the British Empire around the necks and pocketbooks of the victims of this vicious scheme. It defrauded the people of this country and the people of the former Commonwealth equally.

Let us all observe the mistake that we made and that the former members of the British Commonwealth made: making peace of any kind with the British Government and suffering the Tories to remain among us.

The people of Great Britain are no better off themselves, having had their political status similarly redefined without their knowledge or consent by a process of enfranchisement during the administration of Benjamin D'Israeli.

And it is all fraud, all based on the unlawful conversion and redefinition of an individual's political status by self-interested Third Parties, and depending on secrecy to pull it off.

We are all in the midst of yet another such scheme, by which the same criminally dishonest British Interests are attempting to redefine "humans" as "trans-humans" --- that is, human GMO products that they own via patent.

They hope to wipe away more than a century of progress and enforcement of human rights by redefining recipients of their patented mRNA fragments as something different --- "trans-humans" that have no human rights. No civil rights. No rights at all, full stop.

Notice the progression of their schemes --- first, redefining living people as "persons" --- unlawfully converting mankind to humankind, and then, redefining "humans" as "trans-humans" to avoid owing their victims human rights.

The only answer is to hunt down the perpetrators as the criminals they are, and subject them to the full force of the Public Law and our righteous anger.

Anyone who supports the cruelty, greed, elitism, and dishonesty of the British Raj at this late date, in India or anywhere else on Earth, needs to be deported from our shores in a leaky boat, never to return.

As our experience and the experience of the British people and the experience of the people of the former British Commonwealth has demonstrated, our big mistake was allowing the Tories and their attorneys to remain among us.

Let's never make the same mistake again.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.