ernie wayne ter Telgte to Motor Vehicle Division

The following letter was mailed by US Postal mail to the Motor Vehicle Division in Helena by ernie wayne ter Telgte in response to a letter they sent out which you can see at this link:

http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/coverlettercure.pdf

Can some person explain to me why STATE OF MONTANA has de-clared pre-deceasement onto it's citizen CIVILITER MORTUUS ?

A notice to the TRUSTEE of the TRUST: STATE OF MONTANA :
Greetings.
This notice is to inform the above TRUSTEE, whose NAME is un-known to me, that a TRUST document, referring to a TRUST: ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE, and bearing a LICENSE OF TRUST #1004319614115, and further claim that scribe trust was created, by a parent trust: STATE OF MONTANA, on 10-15-1961; and that , due to said trust's failure to pay a levied fine against it, it's license to navigate has been posted indefinitely by the TRUSTEE: STATE OF MONTANA, who is the trusty that was required, by law, to appear and / or pay any costs / fines / fees, etc., such as this, associated to TRUST: ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE:
i must , by law, cause the clarification to this seemingly clouded title: ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE, CORPORATE TRUST:

1. i am by nature, caused to be a living man;
2. all allegations contrary to this instantly place such allegors under burden of proof;
3. i deny the ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE TRUST as to be i, or represent 'i', in any way;
4. any appearance contrary to #3, cause engagement of #2, resulting in lack of full disclosure on part of STATE OF MONTANA as claiming creationary status of life;
5. any attempt of any allegor as to cause 'i', FICTITIOUS CORPORATE TRUST : ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE, causes immediate commitance: CAPITAL OFFENSE, as in no way am i qualified for officer positions regarding TRUST:ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE; which causes contrary allegors to be investigated for incompetency as intending to commission and commit GRAND THEFT IDENTITY, 'CAPITE MAXIMA DIMINUTIO';
7. which is, in itself, a capital offense;
8. furthermore, such TRUST: ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE is held under Global/International banking trust law of Rome, and
9. which is ecclesiastical in TRUST FORM/LAW PERTINENT; 1540 a.d.,
10. and held, by CHARTERS of LAWFUL, (OR NOT) OPERATIONS, under the auspices of the current Pope Francis,
11. who retains sole jurisdiction of the aeris (air); and as such, Popes are the only 'entities' who can inflate or deflate such TRUSTS;
12. which such UNITED STATES CHARTER has now been stripped, thru 13 July 2013 papal proclamation: MOTU PROPRIO, of immunity from such #10/#11 inspections of CHARTER; necessitating the setting of a
13. time frame, established by Pope Francis, of 3 years, ending mid 2016, in which:
A) review of all corporate charters B) are being reviewed, by Rome, for C.) the purpose of discovery - "according to charter and lawful"... or not;
14.which will then result in continued operation 'lawful'; OR
15. revocation of said CHARTERS will result in TRUST DEFLATION and
16. Liquidation of assets
17. of which i, the living man, am not , by volunteerism, TRUST CHATTEL; this non-compliance of 'i' to claims of such trust holders, based on lack of full disclosure as noted on page 1, #s 1-4, other #s non exclusive;
18, which brings about then, a necessary investigation into the ENCHARTERMENT: STATE HOOD STATE OF MONTANA into and under as a sub-franchise TRUST CORPORATE 1889; UNITED STATES
19. which investigation reveals the pre-1889 Montana State and it's 1855 Hellgate Treaty Montana territory
20.as to have been FRAUDULENTYLY breached by force of 1871 UNITED STATES / CODE / STATUTES, and was
21. created by the B.A.R. as B.A.R.'S government for occupation of the former 1789 united States, which said
22. B.A.R. colluded and conspired to invade and conquer, via the 1861 - 1865 civil war; (emergency war power act)
23. at the beginning of which, Abraham Lincoln by-passed congress (the IM Mature Body) and proclaimed all States as to be "enemies of the United States,"in perpetuity";
24. which placed all state citizens under Martial Law, forever, and such Martial Law still apparently
25. carried out under the 1864 Lieber Code as conscripted by Francis Lieber and based on " Frank" "Law", vs. "civiliter mortuus", (not a court case;) a phrase;
26. which in Black's 5th means "dead in view of law"; the condition of one who has lost his civil rights and capacities and is accounted dead in law";
27. which, such death is identified in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS: TRUST NAME,
28. and this is the estate trust: State OF MONTANA identifies itself as, and
29. caused by the requirements of the B.A.R. via ENCHARTERMENT: STATEHOOD; united states; 1871 corporate:
30. and which STATEHOOD OF DEATH then identifies it's STATE CITIZENS
31. as estate named: 'DECEASED', entrusted as "CIVILITER MORTUUS",
32. also known as CAPITUS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA, (S.S. = coordinates: "Grave Site"...)
33. there-by leaving the naturally living persons as seemingly DEAD PERSONS & CALLED strawman trust;
34. which is claimed as actual by the STATE OF MONTANA, as it carries on war against it's own citizens,
35. and such war announced upon the face of STATE BIRTH CERTIFICATE at birth of infant, = SUDDEN DEATH', and
36. who is then held as a DECEASE PRISONER OF WAR, 'CIVILITER MORTUUS for entire life, an enemy in perpetuity of the B.A.R.'UNITED STATES'.
37. and which is now endurant of a papal inspection as to "operating according to Charter and Lawfully",
38. which, if the 1871 UNITED STATES CORPORATIONAL CHARTER is revoced
39. then so shall be all sub-charters granted for statehood: STATE OF MONTANA due to incompetency and mal-intent of B.A.R. UNITED STATES
40. followed by Papal deflation of UNITED STATES TRUST, CORP.U.S. 1874;
41. STATE OF MONTANA TRUST;
42. followed by Papal seizure of all/ ALL 'ACTORS AND CONSENTORS to the ACTS of the ACTORS'; "MOTU PROPRIO";
43. followed by liquidation of the assets claimed by such corporate TRUSTS, (assets = citizens as chattel...)
44. and this is why i truthfully and steadfastly deny any claims laid upon ' i ', the naturally living man;
45. further-more, as regards the selfclaimed 'judge' from a court in GALLATIN COUNTi, Dept.1;
46. his name is RICK WEST- JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, & whose oath appears 'non - sub - scribed'; and
47. who is under allegations of corrupt capitalism via the court registry investemt system, aka the 'C.R.I.S. REPORT'; (='fraudulent enrichment')...
48. who was filmed, by KBZK channel 7 Fox News, as he stripped certified C.R.I.S. report documents; 'FIERIES FACIAS' orders of UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, ='Thou Shalt Give Answer!', then
49. which, at that point, Rick West sealed remaining files re:ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE TRUST, even
50. forbidding Sheriff Gootkins deputy access to said file, before witnesses;
51. whose staff was complicit in charging a $25.00 access fee prior to outright prohibitance / public file;
52. who wilfully flew the sole (flag) standard of war mari-time in his court, on behalf of B.A.R.'S 1871 UNITED STATES: GOVERNMENT;
53. who, due to his own bias, forced himself into a position of having to recuse himself from the next two movements of war that the STATE OF MONTANA thought to bring upon ' i '';
54. who transferred another claimed justice of the peace as a substitute for himself; ARTHUR J. BEHAR,
55. who did commence the appearance of a 1789 Constitutional Common Law Court, laying great claims as to such;
56. and who, by order of RICK WEST, failed to have removed from RICK WEST'S court, the SOLE STANDARD FLAG OF WAR MARITIME; 'MARI CLAUSUM';
57. who, by order of RICK WEST, caused to be forbidden all method of record, which is the purpose of such courts of no record...; for hiding PRIVATE PIRACY... and
58. thru whom, ultimately, i prevailed by presenting ' i ', myself, seen as to be mature, competent, truthful and more honorable than any actors and consentors, resulting
59. in jury ruling of " not guilty" of resisting arrest": TKT # 13-5029;
60. and which was also filmed by KBZK;
61. yet RICK WEST JUSTICE OF THE PEACE an un - "sub-scribed" (under-written) court actor, flagged on by a consentor named MARTY LAMBERT Pro se' cutor for GALLATIN COUNT-i, pursues the living on behest of an ESTATE TRUST STATE OF MONTANA, which voluntarily entered 'CIVILITER MORTUUM; and a greed to be identified as CAPITES MAXIMA DIMINUTION, rolling this onto your citizens; SHAME ON YOU !!! You are a most unwise TRUSTEE, a most despicable EXECUTOR of CAPITAL CRIMES against the people; a malignant BENEFACTOR / BENEFICIARY, governing the living from your own SEPULCHRE : STATE OF MONTANA; A BANKRUPT CORPORATION;
62 how dare you to think that you can tell the living how to live; each must rule themselves well, harming none;
63. yet you have already, gleefully proclaimed 'our DEATHS; and pirateered,
64. thinking nothing of it, DIS-CLAIMING the harms that you conspire and collude to cause; (Leiber Code - Article II...)
65. and so it is, that with great sadness, i now see that STATE OF MONTANA'S evil leadership, beginning 1889, have turned this part of earth into a gian cemetery, laden with legends which really begins at the 1st claim of England upon this soil;
66. and the B.A.R. son's continue to carry forward the standard of BRITAIN as the desires of their mother's country... the B'nai B'rith hold sway via the Union/Jack;...
67. at this point, i have spent "enough time in the "COMPANY OF DEATH"; and now that i know that your TRUST: STATE OF MONTANA is morraly, metally, spiritually, and physically BANDRUPT, incapable of maturity, rendering STATE OF MONTANA an un-fit lender due to fraud,
68. i do here-by revert, rescind, and revoke your STATE OF MONTANA DRIVER LICENSED as a de-funct credit card, which you never had proper backing to 'loan' or issue any "rights" of any kind, whatsoever; and which you FRAUD-ed me thru;
69. and, as is legally advertised and recommended to do in the case of such cards, i have cut it into many small pieces in order that it never can be used by ANY/any, ever again...; and now,
70. as a living son of soil, i go my way in peace; but the white man cannot...

                                                 - ernie wayne; of the old oaks
       * au'gend: "asset" - authority - 1945
                          noun               websters coll. Dict.  p.65:
1) Any 'item' of 'value' 'owned'.
2) That which is a resource; (HUMAN RESOURCE) as in "character" is an asset

me:  STATE OF MONTANA IS A CORPORATE TRUST which CHARACTERIZES ITSELF AS DEATH, IN OWNERSHIP OF IT'S RESOURCES OF DEATH AS IT'S ASSET. Hmmm... i'm not DEAD, 'nor dead. Hmm... i ani't an 'asset...

now look at "assets", and apply this same knowledge: 'DEAD LINE' /'DEADORS'
[af. "asetz"l from old french "asez" = enough; from latin "ad" = 'to' and 'satis' = 'enough']

1) Law:
    A) The property of a deceased person subject by law to the payment of his (it's) debts and legacies. (Legend/Lagan)
* me: 'property'=character: DEAD
-decease'= DEAD='CIVILITER MORTUUS'
-subject = British Administerial 'Law'
- Law = 'Lex Lares': Myths of 'common law'
his='HIS'= Term of Opprobrium: Lifetime of Shame
-HIS = 'HIS"TRUST' - 'he' never owned;
-debts = 'deador' - bLACK'S 5TH & cASELL'S l.d.
-lEGACIES = legend, capital name: DEATH
B) The entire property, = spirit, mind, body of a person, vs. PERSON = Living vs. DEAD CORPORATION, = Corporation = no soul... or estate, = TRUST ESTATE =DEAD applicable to, = voluntarily, or subject to = by force.  BAR UNITED STATES.
the payment of = harvested / grim reaper his or it's debts. = his; it's = DEADOR- Casell'sLatin Dict.& Black's 5th
2) Ac-count-ing:
The items on the balance sheet of a business, showing the book value of it's resources as real property, cash, materials at any given date.

me: items = chattel = dead characters...
-balance = scales= justice = blind to this mess
-sheet = white papers war = alchemy: tranferrance
-business = corporate' = public trust
-showing = theater= actors & consentors
-book=bookies, etc. = the racetrack-1855
-value = assigned = imagined/'claimed'
-it's = IT'S = TRUST ESTATE:DECEASED
-resources=HUMAN ANIMAL as 'Resources'
-real property = material Body DECEASED VS. living immaterial spirit, sould mind; at any 'given date' = not when gambling on a life insurance future's market... until these 'past' evils are 'stabilized' as 'present' for 'futures!!

CSKT Water Compact Throws Thousands of Montanans “under the bus”

This letter by the President of the Montana Senate, Senator Debby Barrett, needs to be sent out to everyone in Montana, who need to send it to each and every legislator From their area.  SEND THIS OUT UNTIL YOUR FINGERS BLEED.

Paul Stramer

Note:  our sincerest thanks to Senator Debby Barrett President of the Montana Senate, for this OpEd piece concerning the water compact.  It has gone out to newspapers state wide.  It is wonderful to know that our voices have not gone unheard.  Share this with everyone you know!!!!!!!!!!

CSKT Water Compact throws thousands of Montanans “under the bus”

By: Senator Debby Barrett

As a rancher with deep roots on a family place in southwest Montana, I know something about the importance of history—and water rights.  I also understand negotiation and compromise.  That’s why I have served on the state’s Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission since 2011 and voted for some compacts. However, during my time on the reserved water rights commission, I’ve voted “no” to provisions within this compact on seven occasions.  Here is why I will not support the proposed CSKT Compact.

The Legislature’s role is to examine a proposed compact and decide whether or not to enact it into Montana law.  The Legislature’s responsibility and authority includes amending proposals if necessary, and approving all state costs associated with a compact such as this one. (The price tag of the state’s share on the CSKT compact is $55 million total).  But at an informational meeting held by proponents, the Legislature was warned that it cannot amend the proposal.  It’s a “take it or leave it” deal.

That insult to the constitutional role of the Legislature is enough for me to want to leave it. Other proposed compacts have not been thrust on us, the Legislature, with such arrogance and disrespect for Legislators.  But there are other good reasons, too.

The 2013 Legislature refused to ratify the last CSKT Water Right Compact, for many good reasons concerning its legality and equal treatment of this state’s citizens, both on and off the reservation.  In fact, the primary proponents of the Compact this time concede that the previous version was very flawed and needed to be rejected.

Now, it has been re-introduced, but not much changed or improved.  While one portion of it was somewhat re-negotiated during the interim between the 2013 and the 2015 Legislative Sessions, the result did not improve that portion enough to protect local individual water users, both tribal members and nonmembers, and failed completely to address legal and policy shortcomings, on and off reservation, in the original proposal.

Off the Flathead reservation, these failures include more than a dozen permanent surrenders of the Legislature’s authority over water in Montana, allowing the CSKT to choose whether to obey legislative enactments or not and giving them complete immunity from compliance with important aspects of Montana water and environmental law, including the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA).  It also requires the State to give partial ownership of some of its water rights and its contracts for water to the CSKT and to manage those assets for the Tribes’ benefit, rather than all citizens of the State.  In essence, this proposed Compact requires the State to limit its legal authority off the reservation by sharing it with the CSKT--permanently.

On reservation, it gives the CSKT the water right to 110,000 acres of irrigated land owned by individuals, whose irrigation districts have filed on that same water right.  It also reduces irrigation water to many if not all these irrigators, who are tribal members and nonmembers, and it establishes a unique water administration code and governing body, with the State of Montana again compromising its constitutional authority over water rights.

I recognize there are powerful supporters of SB 262, including some elected officials who managed to negotiate changes to the proposals, protecting their constituents at home.  Having heard the evidence as a member of the Compact Commission, I believe the off-reservation in stream flow water rights the Compact gives are not scientifically based or well-grounded in law or history.  But I also recognize that the CSKT and their public relations people have artfully threatened much of the state with water right filings for in stream flows if the Legislature doesn’t simply accept this “take it or leave it” deal.

As a rancher and a Senator who values little ahead of private property rights, I think I know when to call a bluff, and when to stand my ground no matter what.  This is such a time.  Not all values and principles should be compromised away.  I do not believe my fellow ranchers and farmers really want to turn their backs on the thousands of Montanans whose property, including water rights, will be devastated by this proposal.

The proposed CSKT compact is the perfect example of overreaching in negotiations, causing their failure.  The CSKT and federal government on their behalf demanded too much, and the Compact Commission negotiators surrendered too much.  As a state we tried for years to negotiate a deal good for all.  In this compact alone, that has proven to be impossible.  So, it’s time to recognize that this compact is not going to work, and we must prepare to protect the State’s rights, interests,  and sovereignty.  This compact is not just poor policy, sacrificing the rights of thousands of Montanans to protect the rest of the state is the worst policy possible.

Senator Debby Barrett, R-Dillon, is an eight-term lawmaker representing Senate District 36 in the Montana Legislature.  She serves as Senate President for the 64th legislative session.

And here is a message for Governor Bullock and the Montana Legislators who will be voting on this compact.

Published on Feb 7, 2015

Elaine Willman, author of 'Going to Pieces: The Dismantling of the United States of America' says the CSKT Water Compact is like ObamaCare over water in Montana. We must protect Montana's water for ALL Montanans.

ernie wayne ter Telgte Civiliter Mortuus

"Civiliter Mortuus" : p. 223 - Black's 5th 
Civilly dead; dead in the view of the law.
The condition of one who has lost his civil rights and capacities, and is accounted dead in law.

ernie's researched opinions:

ernie: This ties into CAPITE MAXIMA DIMINUTI which = GRAND REDUCTION/LOSS of Civil rights and mental capacities, resulting in the NAME of the so-called :dead in view of the law:" to become a LEGEND, and held as such in ALL GRAND CAPITAL LETTERS of DECEASEMENT.

This artificial death is put into a TRUST AS A CRYPT= ENCRYPTED FORM and becomes a TITLE OF DEATH, having no need of civil anything: THUS, "NO VOICE/NO STANDING/NO LIVING VALUE, only valued by Death;'s CRYPT KEEPERS.... i.e. vault = TRUST UNITED STATE'S = A CRYPT containing another STATE OF MONTANA = CRYPT, suing AT LAW vs. ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE = another CRYPT; this = CAPITALIZING on DEATH, and because the living take too long to die, PRE-DECEASEMENT has been declared by U.S. CRYPT KEEPERS via SHORT (LIFE) FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE, a type of SUDDEN INFANT DEATH "Syndrome", in order that the 7 million $ life Insurance Valuation can be collected at the moment of BIRTH LIVE = D.O.A., DEAD ON ARRIVAL;

this is enhanced further by the AMORTIZATION PRO-CESS (AIN) revealed in the C.U.S.I.P. C.R.I.E.S.  C.A.F.R. funds, the paychecks from the KEEPERS OF THE DEAD, back unto THEMSELVES, while claiming not to be touched by DEATH because THEY put on the BLACK ROBE which wards off DEATH, yet putting up their Talisman,

HONORABLE RICK WEST, between themselves and the DECEASED ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE; in which so doing, showing double-mindedness = competency as THEIR  own TALISMAN is in "CIVILITER MORTUUS' SPELLING;

Now, all corporate entities announce their own PREDECEASEMENT, Prima Facie, every DOCUMENT; then immediately THEY claim to be the LENDER OF rIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, IMMUNITITES to the DECEASED CIVILITER MORTUUS, CAPITE MAXIMA DIMINUTIO, reduced and DEAD, to "a STATE OF SILENCE" = "reductio ad absurdum"  =  No Voice due to NO BODY (Home)...

Thus the question: QUO WARRANTO the DEAD give anything at all to the living; how can STATES MORTUUS INCORPORATED/DECEASED/SILENT make any contact with the naturally living, especially to govern the living in any way at all; there-fore, such CAPITAL CLAIMS by the UNITED STATES CIVILITER MORTUUS, CAPITE MAXIMA DIMINUTIO, Reductio ad absurdum CRYPT DWELLERS/KEEPERS establishes the validity of the CLAIM OF MARTIAL LAW - ABRAHAM LINCOLN- EMERGENCY WAR POWERS ACT 1863;

FRANCIS LIEBER (Lex Libra/Libra lex- Black's 5th FRANK LAW) CODE, 166 ARTICLES RULES OF WAR/ CODE OF CONDUCT 1864; UNITED STATES CORPORATION 1871; CORP.U.S. 1874; BIRTH CERTIFICATE ACT 1906; SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 1933; ALL BANKRUPTCIES UNITED STATES 1871 POST; ALL CLAIMS CAPITAL PRE 1871...; especially all claims of Rome 1411/1412 1707 BRITISH ACTS OF UNION; ALL CLAIMS COMMERCIAL CAPITAL - IS - MAN; ALL ADHESION CONTRACTS - MARRIAGE LICENSE, DRIVERS LICENSE, HUNTING LICENSE, FISHING LICENSE, ETC. LICENTIOUSNESS.

WWW.DEADPEASANTS.BIZ  INSURANCES COMMERCIAL
ALL FORMS POLICY/STATUTE/CODE CLAIMS
and ENFORCEMENT, PRO SE CUTOR IUS;
all BANKING COMMERCIAL
all ACTORS JUDICIAL
all CONSENTORS BAR
all PRIVATE
all PUBLIC

ernie wayne ter Telgte Motions in Liminis

( The following document was filed May 21, 2014 3:39 PM in GALLATIN COUNTY JUSTICE COURT, State of Montana, not Montana state, and forms evidence which contributed along with presentation by the author of the document, that resulted in acquittal) (Lines in Italics and parentheses are not part of the original handwritten document bearing the original court stamp, which I have in my possession)

1. Authority: 1789 Constitution of the united States of America;

My notice: Amendment #1 to said Constitution thru which i claim Full freeness, unabridgeable, to form common, comprehensible sounds as speech, including sounds as symbols on media; nor in any way, do i voluntarily waive any intent positive, towards myself as a living man, as may be expressed, or silent, in said Constitution and Bill of Rights accompanying;

2. Authority: Medical Science;

My notice: i am a natural, living man, composed of the elements of water, soil, air;

3. Authority: Ecclesiastical trust law as began in 1540 a.d., and which is held under CROWN COPYRIGHT LAW;

My notice: that i am not an officer of said trust; nor have i ever, with full knowledge resultant from full disclosure of proffering parties, volunteered to IMPERSONATE any OFFICER;

4. Authority: Judge ARTHUR J. BEHAR'S handwritten notice, on a paper in his possession, that: 

My notice: i proclaimed #s 1-3 to the ADMIRALTY COURT of his jurisdiction, yet he required me to enter into a FOREIGN COURT, reserved only for CORPORATE OFFICERS and THEIR BANKING  activities, which said requirement instantly caused i, the living natural man to be placed, by force, into a state of duress, duly noted by Judge ARTHUR J. BEHAR; and now opens the door to the possibility of tort having been done to my signature intentionally by various county and STATE JUDICIAL and LEGAL ENFORCEMENT ACTORS; some of whom bear TITLES of NOBILITY: ESQUIRE/ATTORNEY, with such titles being forbidden to the States;

6. Authority: 1789 Constitution Article 1- Section 9- sub-section 8 - line 1: "No Title of Nobility Shall be granted by the united States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or Foreign State."; and again in the

7. Authority: 1789 Constitution - Section 10 - subsection 1 - phrase 9: "No State shall ... grant any Title of Nobility.", and such Titles show then, that such BEARERS of Title hold said Title thru the consent of Congress alone, as a Congressional Seal of Approval, such seal called British Accredited Registry, the B.A.R, while the other un-marqued actors afore-mentioned are simply private pirates out for themselves; but, both types require some-one to FALSIFY documents as IMPERSONATING an EXECUTOR;

8. to the proceedings of thich, i do not consent;

9. nor do i consent to being the Surety, the tangible, living mineral asset for, or to , any FICTITIOUS, COMMERCIALIZED, SECURITIZED TRUST; and now, due to the State of duress thrust upon myself by the Court,

10. i command that the ACTORS/STATE bond be immediately brought forward as to establish the evidence, for my inspection, as to who is going to indemnify me, should tort result, in any way to me;

11. Furthermore, i do not consent to the Actors usage of TERMS OF ART,  A.K.A, TERMS OF LEGAL CONTROL/POWER, A.K.A, LEGALESE; to wit, an

12. Authority: UNITED STATES 9TH DISTRICT SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA, directly referenced in DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. DICK ANTHONY HELLER 554 U.S. __ (2008) See p. 3-..."technical meaning"; - "secret or technical meanings that would not have been known to ordinary citizens in the founding generation."; Further such quotes by Justice Scalia, are found in various cites through-out this 63 page CASE: therefore, i here-by motion this current ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION COURT to immediately CLOSE ALL STATE CASES against the Name of i, the living, natural man,.

duress and coercion prime evidence standing
ernie wayne ter Telgte

Certificate of Service and acknowledgement:
that i, the living natural man known as

coercion and duress prime evidence standing
ernie wayne ter Telgte,

have here-by filed this motion in Liminis as my response to the STATE OF MONTANA vs. (not me) ERNIE WAYNE TERTELGTE, and such response/filing a result of coercion and duress, as noted by JUDGE ARTHUR J. BEHAR on 16 May 2014.  i do not use in any way, any document for the purpose of COPYRIGHT  infringement.

The Question is "Who Owns This Land" the federal government or the states?

Cliven Bundy Answers this question!

Published on Sep 5, 2014

http://agenda21radio.com Cliven Bundy talks with Paul Preston and company at the Liberty Tour Event at Win-River Casino, Redding, CA August 30, 2014. Bundy gets to tell his side of the story and what went on during the Bundy Ranch standoff last May, 2014.
This is the first Liberty Tour Event that will be happening throuout California. If you wish to attend one of these events, tickets are available through http://agenda21radio.com
During his talk Win-River Casino suffered a false alarm fire alert which lasted at least 20 minutes. This time has been eliminated from the youtube video.

Originally found at:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELbgUwk7AZ8#t=203

Did You Know the IRS and the Fed are Private Corporations?

Pao L. Chang, Guest
Waking Times

Most people living in the USA have no clue that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is a foreign agency. To be more accurate, the IRS is a foreign private corporation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and is the private “army” of the Federal Reserve (Fed). Its main goal is to make sure the American people pay their tax and be good little slaves.

Evidence showing that the IRS isn’t part of the United States government

Like the Federal Reserve (Fed), the IRS isn’t part of the United States government. Instead, it is a collection agency of the privately owned Fed.

Read this very interesting article and watch the video here:

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/01/27/know-irs-fed-private-corporations/

For much more on how your money, heritage, and freedom have been stolen for decades:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

All government has been incorporated. Look at Dunn and Bradstreet and see every county government listed as a corporation.

The State of Montana is a corporation as opposed to Montana state which is a physical land mass with a border.

You can NOT understand this until you study Judge Anna von Reitz's writings at the above website.

There is a way out of their unlawful system.

The whole truth about the CSKT Water Compact!

Published on Feb 4, 2014

Water Rights expert, Dr. Kate Vandemoer, breaks down the CSKT Water Compact in a simple, and factual, manner.

The Stench Rising from Libby Montana AGAIN

One of my sons saved this young man's life after an auto accident a few years back.  I met him a couple of times.

He was UNARMED when he was shot outside of this woman's home. What lethal force or imminent threat of bodily harm could have justified this killing?

If it was me that did this shooting the way it was done they would lock me up and throw away the key, but this woman hasn't even been charged with manslaughter let alone murder, and was never even arrested. Something smells very rotten in Libby Montana government.

I even heard a rumor that he was shot in the back, not the chest. How about that Bernie?  When will you release the results of an autopsy? Or maybe you didn't even do one, and swept that under the rug?  HOW ABOUT SOME ANSWERS BERNIE?

Paul Stramer.

----- Original Message -----

From: Stephan

To: Paul Stramer at Eurekadsl.net

Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 1:13 AM

Subject: Uninvestigated Murder in Lincoln County

Hi, Paul

Here is a petition for you to send out to your list. Bernie Cassidy is at it again, and this time it is bad. Please sign this petition for the mother’s sake and to piss off Lincoln County. If you want more details, let me know. I am writing up a public records request for the mother to try and get some answers. It has been over a month and no one has talked to her family about the nature of the relationship between the mother in law and wife.

https://www.change.org/p/bernard-cassidy-justice-for-michael-roloff

Thanks to everybody who signs.

Water compact media blitz raises new questions

by icthe4est
Note: A great letter to the Editor from well respected former legislator Aubyn Curtiss.
To the Editor,
MEDIA BLITZ RAISES NEW QUESTIONS
Yes, we know that the Salish/Kootenai tribes are promised $ 1.2 billion if the CSKT Compact is approved & Montana is committed to pony up another $ 55 million. Now we hear that upwards of another million has been added to the mix with the emergence of an intensive media campaign purported to be in the scope of a gubernatorial or presidential campaign—that much in radio contracts alone.
Concerned water users in the Clark Fork Basin, puzzled by the dubious assertions made by the spokesperson for the newly formed group, Farmers and Ranchers for Montana, have had their attention jerked to this even more puzzling development. Who is paying for the radio ad campaign? What special interest can afford the side bar ads on the Internet? They are not cheap.
In an editorial printed here on 1/15 it was indicated that the expressed purpose of the above group is to “educate Montanans about the CSKT. Yet there seems to be no substantive information made available and it seems to be the case with the other promotional ads too. Only glowing statements supporting passage. How can they be so certain when the sponsor of the CSKT bill is still endeavoring this week-end to prepare what he described as a “risk analysis.” This, too, grabs attention when the senator has stated that our county, one of eleven “off-reservation” counties whose water rights could be compromised, is protected.
Montanans do need educating about the 1400 (1500?) page CSKT Compact! We need to learn exactly what Montana stands to gain, other than an ethereal promise of less water litigation. We need to know the cause of these actions hanging over our heads. Are they related to 12,000 actions threatened by the tribes if the CSKT is not passed by the Montana Legislature? Anywhere else that could be perceived as a threat.
We need to know if Montana’s best interest here is the same as the interests of non-tribal water users who have properly filed on water they are putting to beneficial use and depending upon Montana’s Constitution and court system to protect their rights.
We need to know the ramifications of agreeing to a precedent-setting deal—the like of which never before in these United States has given a sovereign tribal nation the right to control distribution of off-reservation water. We know that the U.S. Justice Department will enforce that right, once it is surrendered by Montana, but the big question is who will be defending the rights of John or Jane Doe? Has any thought been given to the number of suits when they discover that their rights have been literally sold down the river? And once other Tribal Nations view the bonanza granted the Salish/Kootenai, what is to prevent them from bringing actions to obtain the same advantage? Endless litigation.
Wake up, Montana, before special interests; Uncle Sam and/or the Salish Kootenai buy enough advertising to convince your legislator to capitulate to their demands. Make no mistake—they want it all. and too many people we have sent to Helena seem willing to help them get it. The U.S. Justice Department has never backed off from representing tribal interests on the reservations—now the Compact opens the door to a whole new playing field. It makes perfect sense for the federal government to ante up 1.2 billion dollars if it can buy them the ability to see that control of water in the entire Clark Fork Basin is placed within their grasp as custodians of tribal interests. Water is today’s gold!

Thanks for opportunity to comment.
Aubyn Curtiss (termed from Senate in 2010)
Twenty-four year veteran of Montana Legislature
House & Senate Judiciary & Natural Resources Committees
Select Water Committee Assignments
Chair, State/Federal Relations Committee

STOP the CSKT Water Compact - Full Micro-Documentary

Published on Feb 1, 2015

Here is the full Mini-Documentary on the CSKT Water Compact Thanks to Purple Planet.Com for the background audio.



You are NOT being told the truth about this compact by the media. There is a multi-million dollar propaganda campaign being waged by the people who want to steal your water!

WE DON'T NEED TO GIVE THE WATER RIGHTS ON OVER 100,000 ACRES TO THE TRIBE AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

This is nothing less than an outright theft under the color of law.

AmRRon CH 3 emergency radio project

Introduction to AmRRON -- the American Redoubt Radio Operators Network and The American Preparedness Radio Network. Disaster preparedness communications network for patriots.







Part 2



Part 3



To see some radio gear go to http://www.fm2way.com

For more information call  800 889 2839 or email  pstramer@eurekadsl.net

For the Oathkeepers band plan, which is very similar to AmRRon follow this link:

http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/emergencycommplan.pdf

Notes From The Field "A Fake Bank?" By Simon Black

January 28, 2015   Notes From The Field   By Simon Black

“just because you can log on to your bank’s website and see an account balance printed on the screen doesn’t mean that the money is actually there.”

Sovereign Valley Farm, Chile

Last May, Mr. Wang from Hangzhou, China walked into a bank on Jiangpu Street in Nanjing, opened an account, and made a 12 million yuan deposit.

The bank was new, but it didn’t look different from any other bank that Mr. Wang had been to.

It had a giant vault, counters for the tellers, exchange and interest rates posted on the wall. And above all, it was very elegant.

But after a few weeks, Mr. Wang stopped receiving the interest he’d been promised.
~~~

When he tried to withdraw his money, the bank froze his deposit. So he went straight to the police.

Turns out that even though it had been operating for over a year, it wasn’t actually a licensed bank.

Apparently some people had simply renovated a building to give customers the impression that they were a real bank. But it was a total scam.

Some of the senior executives have since been arrested, and the story is now slowly leaking out to the Western world.

What I find particularly interesting about this story is that it reveals how people have been programmed to hand over our hard-earned savings to complete strangers, simply because we walk into a building and see a vault.

In this case the bank itself was a ‘fake’, i.e. it wasn’t sanctioned by the government.

Candidly, though, I find very little difference from government-licensed banks that recklessly gamble their customers’ money… or that are effectively insolvent to begin with.

It’s crazy to think that very few people ever conduct due diligence on their bank.

You wouldn’t just walk up and hand over your life savings to some bum on the street.

But put him suit standing in front of a vault and suddenly the air of legitimacy compels us to hand over everything to this complete stranger who has a track record of screwing his customers.

We’ve discussed this before. Many banks, particularly in the West, are highly illiquid and borderline insolvent.

You don’t even have to take my word for it. Go see for yourself.

Each quarter, most large banks publish their financial statements. And with a few simple calculations you will be able to see just how illiquid they really are.

Some of the largest banks in the west, for example, state in their financials that they only hold a small fraction (often less than 3%) of their customers’ deposits.

The rest is loaned out or gambled away. It’s not exactly a conservative practice.

Given that they actually publish these results, the banks themselves are telling anyone who’s paying attention that they’re very risky.

Fortunately for them there are very few people paying attention. People simply think that just because it’s a bank, it must be safe.

This Chinese bank happened to be fake. But again, when you look at the actual data, the “real” banks, particularly in the developed West, aren’t much safer.

Bottom line — banking is all about confidence. It’s imperative to have trust and reliability in credible, conservative, strong, transparent financial institutions.

Even if you don’t understand finance, one way to test your bank’s transparency is to ask them for their financial statements.

If they won’t do it, you should not only walk out the door, you should run. And be sure to take all of your money with you.

Handing your money to a stranger DEMANDS transparency. If they’re not willing to be transparent, that’s a bad sign.

As the people of Cyprus found out nearly two years ago, just because you can log on to your bank’s website and see an account balance printed on the screen doesn’t mean that the money is actually there.

For banks, your account balance is a liability -- money they owe you. Think about that: your bank OWES you YOUR own money. Do they have it?

It’s a question worth asking. And a lot of the information is right there in the financials.

Just because there’s a vault in a building doesn’t mean that they’re good for it.

Trust and confidence are built by conducting serious due diligence and making calculated, informed decisions about the strangers that we’re dealing with.

Until tomorrow,   Signature  Simon Black   Founder, SovereignMan.com

If you want more like this go to this website and subscribe:  http://www.sovereignman.com/welcome/

NUMBER ONE WITH A BULLET

Published on Jan 23, 2015

The USA has, by far, the highest per capita gun ownership in the world. Progressives will tell you that this is what makes America the Murder Capitol of Planet Earth. But we're not, and in this devastatingly effective Firewall, Bill Whittle shows why the center of Gun Nut Nation is in fact one of the safest places in the world.

When we are carrying concealed we better have eyes in the back of our heads

Another issue is UNCONSTITUTIONAL gun laws like the stupid Montana prohibited places laws.

The Montana shooting sports association is trying to get that stupid law repealed or modified.

http://leg.mt.gov/bills/2015/billpdf/LC0296.pdf

The permit holder broke concealment.   It's one thing to suspect that somebody is carrying a gun. It's another thing to actually see the gun.

In Montana the person carrying could lawfully have carried the gun openly.  What would this ignorant person who tackled him have done then?

The prohibited places laws are INFRINGEMENT and make no sense whatsoever. 

The reasoning is completely faulty.  They want to disarm law abiding people in these places, to make who safer?

The criminals who carry guns unlawfully anyway!   It certainly doesn't make the law abiding person safer!

Unconstitutional so called "laws" are NOT laws at all. They are null and void.

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491. " An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton Vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html

Gunowner revolt breaks out in another state

Sheriff Thomas Lorey of Fulton County, New York

A sheriff in Fulton County, New York, is taking on that state’s anti-gun establishment by defying an attempt to have legal handgun owners “recertify” their right to bear arms with the state bureaucracy.

New York adopted the sweeping SAFE Act legislation in 2013 with most of the attention focused on a ban on “assault rifles” and high-capacity clips. But a little-known provision of the bill requires every handgun owner to recertify their permit with the local sheriff or clerk’s office by 2018. The counties are then required to upload the permit information to a statewide digital database that is being created. The process must be repeated every five years.

The state has sent out 500 “invitations” to gun owners in several counties asking them to participate in an early pilot program. They are asked to go online and upload their information on each gun they own.

Sheriff Thomas Lorey of Fulton County volunteered his county to participate in the pilot program, only so he could send a message to the bureaucrats in the state Capitol, including Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

“I’m asking everyone that gets those invitations to throw them in the garbage because that is where they belong,” Lorey said at a recent meeting with conservative activists. “They go in the garbage because, for 100 years or more, ever since the inception of pistol permits, nobody has ever been required to renew them.”

The state wants to roll out the new online registration database by February, Lorey said.

“I don’t think they’re going to be able to do it,” he said. “Let’s have everybody’s permit expire the same day and let ‘em see what they’re going to do with it.”

Watch video clip of Sheriff Lorey explaining his position below:

http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/sheriffs-advice-toss-gun-registration-letters-in-trash/#Zyc4UVj4dWyIVsxl.99

What Will Finally Destroy the Constitution

This is a seminar discussing the facts v. fiction of a Constitutional Convention.



The website is:   http://defendnotchange.com/

SECOND SUNDAY AFTER EPIPHANY

Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's
The Church's Year

In the Introit of this day's Mass the Church calls upon all creatures to thank God for the Incarnation of His only-begotten Son. INTROIT Let all the earth adore Thee, O God and sing to Thee: let it sing a psalm to Thy name (Ps. 65:4). Shout with joy to God all the earth, sing ye a psalm to His name: give glory to His praise (Ps. 65:1-2). Glory be to the Father. COLLECT Almighty and eternal God, Who disposest all things in heaven and on earth: mercifully hear the supplications of Thy people, and give Thy peace to our times. Through our Lord. EPISTLE (Rom.12:6-16). Brethren: We have different gifts, according to the grace that is given us: either prophecy, to be used according to the rule of faith, or ministry in ministering, or he that teacheth in doctrine, he that exhorteth in exhorting, he that giveth with simplicity, he that ruleth with carefulness, he that sheweth mercy with cheerfulness. Let love be without dissimulation. Hating that which is evil, cleaving to that which is good: loving one another with the charity of brotherhood: with honor preventing one another: in carefulness not slothful: in spirit fervent: serving the Lord: rejoicing in hope: patient in tribulation: instant in prayer: communicating to the necessities of the saints: pursuing hospitality: bless them that persecute you: bless and curse not. Rejoice with them that rejoice, weep with them that weep: being of one mind, one towards another: not minding high things, but consenting to the humble. Be not wise in your own conceits. EXPLANATION. St. Paul in this epistle exhorts every Christian to make good use of the gifts of God; if one receives an office, he must see well to it, so that he can give an account to God of the faithful performance of his duties. He exhorts especially to brotherly love which we should practice by charitable works; such as, receiving strangers hospitably, giving alms to those who are in need, and to those who by misfortune or injustice have lost their property; he commands us, at the same time, to rejoice in the welfare of our neighbor, as we rejoice at our own good fortune, and to grieve at his misfortunes as we would over those which befall us. How is brotherly love best preserved? By the virtue of humility which makes us esteem our neighbor above ourselves, consider his good qualities only, bear patiently his defects, and always meet him in a friendly, respectful, and indulgent manner. Humility causes us to live always in peace with our fellowmen, while among the proud, where each wishes to be the first, there is continual strife and dissatisfaction (Prov. 13:10). INSTRUCTION FOR SUPERIORS Those have to expect a severe sentence from God, who merely for temporal gain, seek profitable offices, and thrust themselves therein whether capable or not, and if capable care very little whether they fulfill the duties required, or perhaps make the fulfillment of them depend upon bribes. Of such God makes terrible complaint: Thy princes (judges) are faithless, companions of thieves: they all love bribes, they run after rewards. They judge not for the fatherless; and the widow's cause comes not into them (Is. 1:23). A most severe judgment shall be for them that bear rule (Wisd. 6:6). ASPIRATION Grant us, O Lord, Thy grace, that according to Thy will, we may follow the instructions of St. Paul in regard to humility and love, have compassion upon all suffering and needy, think little of ourselves, and descend to the lowest, that we may, one day, be elevated with them in heaven. GOSPEL (Jn. 2:1-11). At that time there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee: and the mother of Jesus was there. And Jesus also was invited, and his disciples, to the marriage. And the wine failing, the mother of Jesus saith to him: They have no wine. And Jesus with to her: Woman, what is it to me and to thee? my hour is not yet come. His mother saith to the waiters: Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye. Now there were set there six water-pots of stone, according to the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three measures apiece. Jesus saith to them: Fill the water-pots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And Jesus saith to them: Draw out now, and carry to the chief steward of the feast. And they carried it. And when the chief steward had tasted the water made wine, and knew not whence it was, but the waiters knew who had drawn the water; the chief steward calleth the bridegroom, and saith to him: Every man at first setteth forth good wine; and when men have well drank, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee: and manifested his glory, and his disciples believed in him. Why was Christ and His mother present at this marriage? In order to honor this humble and God-fearing couple who, with faithful hearts, had invited Him and His mother to their wedding; to give us an example of humility; to assist them in their poverty, and save their good name by changing water into wine; to reveal His dignity as the Messiah to His disciples by this miracle; and to sanctify by His presence the marriages that are contracted in the spirit of the Church. Alas! how few marriages of our time could Jesus honor with His presence, because He is invited neither by fervent prayer, nor by the chaste life of the couple: He is excluded rather, by the frequent immorality of the married couple and their guests. Why was Mary interested in this married couple? Because she is merciful, and the Mother of Mercy, and willingly assists all the poor and afflicted who fear God. From this incident, St. Bonaventure judges of the many graces which we can hope for through Mary, now that she reigns in heaven; "For," says he, "if Mary while yet on earth was so compassionate, how much more so is she now, reigning in heaven!" He gives the reason by adding: "Mary now that she sees the face of God, knows our necessities far better than when she was on earth, and in proportion to the increase of her compassion, her power to aid us has been augmented." Ah! why do we not take refuge in all our necessities to this merciful mother, who although unasked assists the needy? Why did Christ say to Mary: Woman, what is it to me and to thee? This seemingly harsh reply of Christ was no reproach, for Mary had made her request only through love and mercy, and Christ calls those blessed who are merciful, but he wished to show that in the performance of divine work, the will of His heavenly Father alone should be consulted. He meant to remind her that He had not received the gift of miracles from her as the son of woman, but from His eternal Father, in accordance with whose will He would do that which she asked when the hour designed by God would come. Though the hour had not come, yet He granted the wish of His mother, who knew that her divine Son refused none of her requests, and so she said to the servants: "Whatsoever He shall say to you, do ye." Behold the great power of Mary's intercession! Neglect not, therefore, to take refuge in this most powerful mother! What are we taught by the words: My hour is not yet come? These words teach us that we should in all things await God's appointed time, and in things belonging to God and His honor, act only by divine direction, without any human motives. What does the scarcity of wine signify? In a spiritual sense the want of wine may be understood to signify the lack of love between married people, which is principally the case with those who enter this state through worldly motives, for the sake of riches, beauty of person, or who have before marriage kept up sinful intercourse. These should ask God for the forgiveness of their sins, bear the hardships of married life in the spirit of penance, and change the wrong motives they had before marriage; by doing so God will supply the scarcity of wine, that is the lack of true love, and change the waters of misery into the wine of patient affection. Why did Christ command them to take the wine to the steward? That the steward, whose office required him to be attentive to the conduct of the guests, and to know the quality of the wine, should give his judgment in regard to the excellence of this, and be able to testify to the miracle before all the guests. ASPIRATION O my most merciful Jesus! I would rather drink in this world the sour wine of misery than the sweet wine of pleasure, that in heaven I may taste the perfect wine of eternal joy. INSTRUCTION ON THE HOLY SACRAMENT OF MATRIMONY What is Matrimony? Matrimony is the perfect, indissoluble union of two free persons of different sex, for the purpose of propagating the human race, mutually to bear the burdens of life and to prevent sin (I Cor. 7:2). Who instituted Matrimony? God Himself, the Creator of all things (Gen. 1:27-28). He brought to man the helpmate, whom He formed from one of the ribs of Adam, that she who came from his heart, might never depart therefrom, but cling to him in the indissoluble bond of love (Gen. 2:18, 24). To this original, divine institution Christ refers (Mt. 19:4-6), and the Church declares the bond of marriage perpetual and indissoluble. Is Matrimony a Sacrament? Yes; according to the testimony of the Fathers, the Church has held it such from the times of the apostles, which she could not do, had Christ not raised it to the dignity of a Sacrament. St. Paul even calls it a great Sacrament, because it is symbolical of the perpetual union of Christ with His Church; and the Council of Trent declares: "If any one says that Matrimony is not really and truly one of the seven Sacraments of the Church instituted by Christ, but an invention of men that imparts no grace, let him be anathema" (Conc. Trid., Sess. XXIV, can. 1). What graces does this Sacrament impart? The grace of preserving matrimonial fidelity inviolate: the grace of educating children as Christians; of patiently enduring the unavoidable difficulties of married life, and of living peaceably with each other. Married people are indeed greatly in need of these graces, in order to fulfil their mutual obligations. What is the external sign in the Sacrament of Matrimony? The union of two single persons in Matrimony, which according to the regulations of the Council of Trent (Conc. Trid., Sess. XXIV, can. 1), must be formed publicly in the presence of the pastor, or with his permission before another priest, and two witnesses. What preparations are to be made to receive the grace of this Sacrament? 1. The first and best preparation is a pure and pious life. 2. The light of the Holy Ghost should be invoked to know whether one is called to this state of life. 3. The parents and the father-confessor should be asked for advice. 4. The choice should be made in regard to a Christian heart, and a gentle disposition rather than to beauty and wealth. 5. The immediate preparation is, to purify the conscience, if it has not already been done, by a good general confession, and by the reception of the most holy Sacrament of the Altar. Before their marriage the young couple should ask their parents' blessing, should hear the nuptial Mass with devotion, with the intention of obtaining God's grace to begin their new state of life well, and finally they should commend themselves with confidence to the protection of the Blessed Virgin Mary and her spouse St. Joseph. Why are there so many unhappy marriages? Because so many people prepare the way by sins and vices, and continue to sin without interruption, and without true amendment until marriage, therefore always make sacrilegious confessions, even perhaps immediately before marriage. Besides this many enter the married life on account of carnal intentions, or other earthly motives; in many cases they do not even ask God for His grace; without any proper preparation for such an important, sacred act, on their marriage day they go to church with levity and afterwards celebrate their wedding with but little modesty. Is it any wonder that such married people receive no blessing, no grace, when they render themselves so unworthy? Why did God institute married life? That children might be brought up honestly and as Christians, and that they should be instructed especially in matters of faith; that married people should sustain each other in the difficulties of life, and mutually exhort one another to a pious life; and lastly, that the sin of impurity might be avoided. For they who in such manner receive matrimony as to shut out God from themselves, and from their mind, and to give themselves to their lust, as the horse and mule which have not understanding, over them the devil hath power (Too. 6:17). 'With what intentions should the married state be entered? With such intentions as the young Tobias and his bride had, who before the marriage ceremony, ardently prayed God for His grace, and took their wedding breakfast in the fear of the Lord (Too. 14:15). Hence God's blessing was with them until death. If all young people would enter the married state thus, it would certainly be holy, God-pleasing and blessed, and the words of St. Paul, spoken to wives, would come true unto them: Yet she shall be saved by bearing children, if she continue in faith, and love, and sanctification with sobriety (I Tim. 2:15). Why are the bans of marriage published three times in Church? That all impediments which would render the marriage unlawful may be made known. Such impediments are: consanguinity, clandestine marriages, etc. Therefore, any one who is aware of such impediments, is bound to make them known to the pastor. Why is the marriage performed in the presence of the parish priest? Because the Catholic Church expressly declares that those marriages which are not performed in presence of the pastor, or with his permission before another priest, and two witnesses, are null and void (Conc. Trid., Sess. XXIV can. 1)1; and because the blessing of the priest, which he imparts in the name of the Church, gives the couple, if they are in a state of grace, strength, fortitude and grace to be faithful to each other, to endure all trials patiently, and to be safe from all the influences of the evil enemy." Why do they join hands before the priest, and two witnesses? By this they bind themselves before God and His Church to remain true to each other, and to be ready to assist each other in all adversities. The bridegroom puts a ring on the bride's finger which should remind her of her duty of inviolable fidelity; to this end the priest signs and seals this holy union with the unbloody Sacrifice of the New Law. Can the bond of marriage be dissolved in the Catholic Church? A valid marriage, contracted with the free consent of each of the parties, can according to the plain doctrine of the Scriptures, the constant teaching and practice of the Church, be dissolved only by the death of one of the parties. If the pope or a bishop, for important reasons, gives a divorce, this is only partial, and neither can marry again while the other lives. Such a marriage would not be valid. How pure and holy are the doctrine and practice of the Catholic Church in this the most important and sacred of all human relations, preserving its inviolability and sanctity; while, on the contrary, by means of the wanton doctrine of the heretics, which for trivial reasons entirely dissolves the marriage contract, this sacred union is made the deepest ignominy of mankind, and the play-ball of human passions and caprice! What is thought of mixed marriages, or marriages between Catholics and Protestants? The Catholic Church has always condemned such marriages, because of the great dangers to which the Catholic party is unavoidably exposed as well as the offspring. Such marriages promote indifference in matters of religion, by which the spiritual life of the soul is destroyed; they are a hindrance to domestic peace, cause mutual aversion, quarrels, and confusion; they give scandal to servants; they interfere with the Christian education of the children, even render it impossible, and they frequently lead to apostasy and despair. But the Catholic Church condemns especially those mixed marriages, in which either all or a number of the children are brought up in heresy, and she can never bless and look upon those as her children who do not fear to withdraw themselves and their own children from the only saving faith, and expose them to the danger of eternal ruin. Therefore, those Catholics who enter the matrimonial union with Protestants, although the marriage if lawfully contracted is valid, commit a mortal sin if they permit their children to be brought up in heresy, and should it not be their full intention to bring up their children in the Catholic faith at the time of their marriage, they would commit a sacrilege. What should the newly married couple do immediately after the ceremony is performed? They should kneel and thank God for the graces received in this holy Sacrament, in such or similar words: "Ratify, we beseech Thee, O Lord, that which by Thy grace Thou hast wrought in us, that we may keep that which in Thy presence we have promised unto the day of our Lord Jesus Christ." That they may keep their promise made at the altar, they should always remember the duties laid down to them by the priest at the time of their marriage, and the exhortations which are taken from the epistle of St. Paul to the Ephesians (Eph. 5:29, 31), wherein he instructs married people how they should comport themselves towards each other, and recalls to them as an example the union of Christ with His Church, and His love for her. To the husbands he says, they should love their wives as Christ loved His Church, for which He even gave Himself up to death; from this is seen, that men should assist their wives even unto death, in all need, and not treat them as servants. To the wives St. Paul says, that they as the weaker should be in all reasonable things obedient to their husbands, as the Church is obedient to Christ; for as Christ is the head of the Church, so is the husband the head of the wife. Experience proves there is no better way for women to win the hearts of their husbands than by amiable obedience and ready love, while, on the contrary, a querulous, imperative deportment robs them of their husbands' affections, and even causes them to be regarded with aversion. St. Paul says further; that husbands should love their wives (and consequently wives their husbands) as their own bodies, because married people are, as it were, one. They shall be two in one flesh; no man ever hated his own flesh, but nourisheth and cherisheth it, as also Christ doth the Church (Eph. 5:29, 31). How unjustly and barbarously do those act, who, instead of loving one another, rather hate and outrage each other, and cause the loss of their property, and by detraction steal their honor! These do not consider that he who hates and disgraces his partner in life, hates and disgraces himself; while according to the words of St. Paul he who loves her, loves himself. If married people would remain in constant love and unity, it is most necessary that they should patiently bear with each other's infirmities, wrongs, and defects, exhort one another with mildness and affection, keep their adversities, trials, and sufferings as much as possible to themselves, and complain in prayer only to God, who alone can aid them. By impatience, quarrels, and complaints the cross becomes only heavier and the evil worse. Finally, not only on their wedding day, but often through life, they should earnestly consider that they have not entered the married state that they may inordinately serve the pleasures of the body, but to have children who will one day inhabit heaven according to the will of God; as the angel said to Tobias: "For they who in such manner receive matrimony, as to shut out God from themselves and from their mind, and to give themselves to their lust as the horse and mule, which have not understanding, over them the devil hath power" (Tob. 6:17). PRAYER Most merciful Jesus! who didst work Thy first miracle at the wedding in Cana by changing water into wine, thereby revealing Thy divine power and majesty, and honoring matrimony: grant we beseech Thee, that Thy faithful may ever keep sacred and inviolate the holy sacrament of Matrimony, and that they may so live in it truthfully, in the fear of the Lord, that they may not put an obstacle in the way of obtaining heaven for themselves, and their children. 1. In all such dioceses of the United States, where the Council of Trent has not been published, civil marriages are considered valid. The Catholic, however, who becomes married by civil authority commits a mortal sin, except in case of extreme necessity. To be married by a sectarian preacher is looked upon as a denial of faith, and incurs excommunication.

Emergency Ham Radio Systems

We have changed our emergency systems over to Ham Radio.

• If there is any kind of emergency in Northwest Montana or the nation these systems will be active.
• We have a Network check every Thursday night at 8 PM and some training classes on Saturdays.

Over the last 6 years we have been busy getting new people to test and get their Ham Radio license.
As a result in Lincoln county we have over 230 ham radio operators, many of whom are monitoring several frequencies most of the day and night. This makes a great emergency network of ham operators, who are getting more proficient at handling emergency traffic.
We have repeaters and other systems that cover not only Lincoln and Flathead counties, but also statewide and nationwide systems that will be the last best communications systems available when everything else quits working. Ham Radio has always been the way to communicate in any emergency, and we are taking it to the next level with all the new technology available including digital modulation on single side band and much more.
We are doing the Liberty Bell system in Lincoln County only on Ham Radio. Call 889-3183 to find out how to participate.

The following links will take you to our Emergency Ham Radio Frequencies and band plans.


Local and Long Distance frequencies for emergencies in Linclon County: Frequency List Oathkeepers National Emergency band plan: Oathkeepers Band Plan
Northwest Information Ham Net

Every Thursday evening at 8 PM Mountain Time on 2 meters at 147.260 with tone 100.0 hz. This is a directed net check in for about a half hour. There will be one or two net control operators calling for checkins from several areas in the 130 mile footprint of the Olney Repeater on Werner Peak at about 7000 ft.
This is a solar powered repeater and has a one minute timer on transmit, so keep your transmissions within that time, and let the repeater drop out completely before transmitting.
It's not a member network. All checkins are welcome when we call your area.
This covers most of Lincoln county, Flathead county, and Lake county, and goes into Canada and most of Glacier Park.

Ham radio operators clinic:

We will try to have a two hour long operational training in the back room at Valley Pizza in Eureka on Saturdays at about 1:00 PM where you can come and ask questions and get individual help on operating your radio and which repeaters to use etc. We will try to have more than one experienced operator of General class and higher there to get you up to speed. Even people who are not licensed that want to learn what can be done with Ham Radio are welcome to attend. This is NOT a license class. This is an operational class. You can call 406 889 3183 for the details. If you need a radio to listen to these networks call me at 406 889 3183