Fast Forward, Or, Stop Being Stupid Part 14

By Anna Von Reitz

It is summer 2014.  For the last ten years the forces of evil have been marching steadily onward and their plans are all-too apparent.  All the "federal" alphabet soup agencies have been armed to the teeth.  Billions of rounds of ammo have been purchased.  The local police have been armed with tactical weapons and armored vehicles and are swaggering around looking nervous and fingering Billy Clubs made of Titanium and steel. 

Every day reports come in of police brutality, more and more evictions and foreclosures, over a million children missing from our streets and schools, test scores in the toilet and then word comes that vast "FEMA Camps" have been built and stocked and provided with armed guards. There are even rumors of vast underground bases built over the course of the Cold War, large enough to house thousands of people, entire cities underground. 

The "federal government" dba UNITED STATES, INC., a storefront governmental services corporation for the IMF, the International Monetary Fund, is preparing for something Big--- the extermination of its Priority Creditors, the American People.

The bosses running the UNITED STATES, INC. stand to make at least a million dollars per dead American as a result of life insurance policies paid for with their own tax money.

Call the Anti-Police: Ending the State's "Security" Monopoly

|"How would things be different,” muses Dale Brown of the Detroit-based Threat Management Center, “if police officers were given financial rewards and commendations for resolving dangerous situations peacefully, rather than for using force in situations where it’s neither justified nor effective?”

Brown’s approach to public safety is “precisely the opposite of what police are trained and expected to do,” says the 44-year-old entrepreneur.  The TMC eschews the “prosecutorial philosophy of applied violence” and the officer safety uber alles mindset that characterize government law enforcement agencies. This is because his very successful private security company has an entirely different mission – the protection of persons and property, rather than enforcing the will of the political class.  Those contrasting approaches are displayed to great advantage in proto-dystopian Detroit.

“We’ve been hired by three of the most upscale neighborhoods in Detroit to provide 24/7 security services,” Brown proudly informed me during a telephone interview. “People who are well-off are very willing to pay for Lamborghini-quality security services, which means that our profit margin allows us to provide free services to people who are poor, threatened, and desperate for the kind of help the police won’t provide.”

“Unlike the police, we don’t respond after a crime has been committed to conduct an investigation and – some of the time, at least – arrest a suspect,” Brown elaborates. “Our approach is based on deterrence and prevention. Where prevention fails, our personnel are trained in a variety of skills – both psychological and physical – to dominate aggressors without killing them.”

Police typically define their role in terms of what they are permitted to do to people, rather than what they are required to do for them. Brown's organization does exactly the reverse, even when dealing with suspected criminals.

To illustrate, Brown refers to an incident from a security patrol in which he encountered a black teenager “who was walking in a neighborhood at about 3:00 a.m. dressed in a black hooded sweatshirt, doing what is sometimes called `the drift’ – it was pretty clear he was up to something.”

Read the entire article here:

http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2014/09/call-anti-police-ending-states-security.html

Resistance is Futile: The Violent Cost of Challenging the American Police State

By John W. Whitehead 
September 09, 2014

“Police are specialists in violence. They are armed, trained, and authorized to use force. With varying degrees of subtlety, this colors their every action. Like the possibility of arrest, the threat of violence is implicit in every police encounter. Violence, as well as the law, is what they represent.”—Kristian Williams, activist and author

If you don’t want to get probed, poked, pinched, tasered, tackled, searched, seized, stripped, manhandled, arrested, shot, or killed, don’t say, do or even suggest anything that even hints of noncompliance. This is the new “thin blue line” over which you must not cross in interactions with police if you want to walk away with your life and freedoms intact.

The following incidents and many more like them serve as chilling reminders that in the American police state, “we the people” are at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to “serve and protect.”

For example, police arrested Chaumtoli Huq because she failed to promptly comply when ordered to “move along” while waiting outside a Ruby Tuesday’s restaurant for her children, who were inside with their father, using the bathroom. NYPD officers grabbed Huq, a lawyer with the New York City Public Advocate’s office, flipped her around, pressed her against a wall, handcuffed her, searched her purse, arrested her, and told her to “shut up” when she cried out for help, before detaining her for nine hours. Huq was charged with obstructing governmental administration, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct.

Read the entire article here:

www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/resistance_is_futile_the_violent_cost_of_challenging_the_american_police_st

Here is an example of the opposite. A real PEACE OFFICER.

http://www.billclarkforsheriff.com/

POLICE BRUTALITY AND MILITARIZATION

I wish I could take credit for this brilliant article, but I can't. It was written by one of our readers who has done his homework as you will soon see. He goes by the name  NEO and I am trying to persuade him to make this the first in a series of regular articles on similar subjects but with no time schedule.
Please comment below and help me with that project.
Thanks, 
Paul
_____________________________
Those who follow the news events across the country are well aware of the increasing reports of atrocities and killings of innocents all across this country by law enforcement personnel. If you have seen some of these reports then you are as aware as I am of how incredulous these stories are. 

One has to wonder how in the world our country has devolved into such insanity. Those the public once considered the peace keepers, public servants, and protectors are rapidly becoming assassins and thugs. The courts have openly declared that law enforcement has no obligation nor duty to protect the people. Indeed, we have now witnessed a situation in which you call law enforcement at your own risk. The truth is that what we used to call peace officers no longer exist. What has replaced them is not public servants or peace keepers but corporate enforcers and revenue generators in a commercial system of profiteering and plundering. They now exist to protect the corporate enterprise from the public and assure it a continuing revenue stream.

There are stories coming in each week where law enforcement was called to assist in some minor incident and someone ends up dead because so-called law enforcement showed up. 

What we are witnessing is an inevitable result of the things we, as a people, have accepted and believed in for the past several decades without question. Our failure to question or understand was an error for which innocents are now dying. 

You no longer have to be a criminal or commit a wrong to end up quite dead. It is without a doubt complete insanity. 

This writer grew up in a world in which I intuitively knew that I owed no man any explanations or excuses for living. I knew that no one had any lawful right to accost me, stop me, question me, interrogate me, make demands of me, touch me, insult me, require me to justify my actions, or order me around. In the old days such behavior by any man toward another was an affront that could result in the violator's death and all understood that. Consequently it rarely happened unless someone decided they had an irresistible death wish.

But in this day and age all people are viewed as criminals by the law enforcement community and treated as such. It is expected that man cower in fear, follow orders, answer to anyone's interrogation, subject themselves to any number of humiliations or abuses an officer can imagine to inflict without question and without refusal under threat of death. And, it seems we have a large number of them on the streets absolutely wishing to kill someone and any damned excuse to do so will do.

That is bad enough but the courts have held that it is okay for these law breakers to lie under oath and for their cronies to lie to cover for them. They have become a brotherhood of criminals working for an organized criminal syndicate. (noted: there are a few individual exceptions but they are being weeded out over time and replaced with these psychopaths)

This is all absolutely absurd and unacceptable at every level. We need to understand how this has come to pass and why we have been conditioned over the years to accept such atrocities and injustices. The reasons exist, the intent is certainly present, and the understanding is necessary if this is to be stopped. Of course the choice is to get it stopped or let it continue to progress at our peril.

People of our current day have drifted so far from reality and the real law that they cannot even conceive of what real law is or how it should function. We are far far far from where we should be as a people or a nation.

At the time of the founding of our country there were at least some learned men who understood the law, its source, and its purpose. The "law" of the land was the common law. The common law was really quite simple. It followed the Ten Commandments and it boiled down quite simply to "DO NO HARM." Doing no harm meant do not harm another, their property, or commit fraud. Whether an act was accidental or criminal came down to intent and was one reason why juries were to be composed of one's peers...ie neighbors, friends, and people who KNEW the accused.

The old expression that "ignorance of the law is no excuse" came from this very simple law amongst men to do no harm. That simple principle was instilled in the very young as they grew up. Although few people could read or write in those early days, they all understood the law of "do no harm". In the event anyone violated that law a jury of people who knew the accused wrongdoer was assembled to determine the facts and determine the recourse, remedy, or reparations to be applied.

In those days if a party was injured in some way, let us say robbed for example, the injured party filed a "claim" against the wrongdoer. A common law jury of the wrongdoers peers, those who were neighbors or knew the accused, to determine the legitimacy of the claim and the reparations required to make the injured party whole again.

The people themselves were the law makers and the law enforcers. No unjust laws could be enforced because they did not exist and the people would not have allowed them to be applied if they had. The findings of a jury could not be overturned by ANY COURT OR ANY JUDGE ANYWHERE. The decision of the people was final.

That is the beauty and the simplicity of the law of the land and the common law. It was this system of law upon which the Constitution was written around. It was understood at the time because the common law was the law of the land. It was the LAW the founders understood to be used across this land and never intended it should be replaced in this country.

One of the causes of the revolution is never discussed in the public schools or the history books. It was the desire by certain investors, bankers, and monarchs to impose a different system of laws into the colonies. That system of laws was/is known as the merchant law. It is a system of laws written to facilitate commerce between merchants, bankers, and nations.

The merchant law is international in character and was needed to be rather uniform to facilitate commerce between nations, merchants, and bankers around the globe. It is also known as the law of the sea, international law, and/or admiralty law because on the "seas of commerce" the captain of the ship makes the law. 

The colonists knew and understood that bringing these laws of commerce onto the land would be devastating to the people and the country as they basically create a system in which everyone is considered either a debtor or a creditor. The intent of bringing these merchant laws onto the shore was to make the colonists debtors and enslave them to the international investors, bankers, and monarchs.

This was in large part the underlying cause of the revolt but it included the control of our currency. I won't get into the currency as that is another vast subject unto itself. My intent is to bring us up to speed on the problems we have with our justice system and law enforcement. This past history just helps to see the differences between where we once were, and should be now, as opposed to what we are witnessing today and why.

Our country and our people have indeed been enslaved but it did not happen overnight. This has transpired over a period of 150 years. The merchant law was indeed brought onto our shores and did indeed replace our common law. Today the merchant law is known as the Uniform Commercial Code. It was completed and made "uniform" by the Bar Association in the mid 1940's, and copyrighted, but was not adopted into all the states until around 1967. 

For those who have been around long enough to consider the difference....look back at life in this country in the 1950's and even the 1960's and compare it to what you see around you now. It is a vastly different country and what were peace officers, trusted friends, and neighbors back then are now called law enforcement officers and have become militarized thugs in uniforms hiding behind badges. Public servants are now corporate officers and personnel offices are now known as "human resources". This is because we moved from a private society to one in which everything and everyone is now considered a commercial entity by the corporate state.

What were once public servants are now a bigger threat to the public than the terrorists or criminals. It is astounding when you think about it. It is like once they put that uniform and badge on they cease to be humans or responsible honorable individuals. They claim that following orders excuses them from the real law which is "do no harm". That badge has become an excuse for law breaking via some perceived, but illegitimate cloak of authority. So, we need to look at that issue and we will.

First, let's go back to the colonies. I cannot envision anyone stopping one of the pioneers or colonists and demanding to know where they were going, what they were doing, what they were thinking, what they were planning, what their business was, telling them to spread their legs, feeling them up and down their bodies, throwing them to the ground, tasering them, clubbing them, cuffing them, pushing them around or ordering them around. Can you?

I'd be willing to bet those folks would have shot the man who dared to talk to them or treat them in such a manner. What's more, I don't believe any other colonist would have blamed them. In fact, they would likely have assisted anyone accosted in such a manner. Such behavior impuned a man's honor and men used to be honorable enough that they would not permit their honor to be impuned. A lot of duels resulted from simple verbal insults to a man's honor.

One has to wonder if modern man has any honor left judging from what they now tolerate. But, I digress. I think we all know and understand that men of old would never have stood for what we witness today.

One reason was because they knew and understood the law. That would be the common law. Under that law you owed NOTHING to anyone if you had done no harm. As long as you were minding you own business and not harming anyone they had best leave you alone. THAT WAS AND IS the real law.

The real law is being violated every day. Our founders and the colonists understood that government and legislators made rules for government and government employees in regards to their work but the colonists also understood that it was not the job of the legislators to attempt to make laws governing or regulating private man.

The simple analogy I have used previously is this: God created man. Man answers to God, his creator. God, however, does not answer to man. The maxim of law is that "the created can never control that which created it". Simple enough. Man does not control his creator, God. Most people can surely understand that simple premise.

Man, created the States and the governments. Man is the creator to these entities. The colonists understood the simple premise in law that what he had created got its authority from man. Man was the source, the authority, and the creator and for government to reverse the tables and claim the authority to rule over man was an absurd, irrational, and totally unacceptable concept.

The only LAW given to rule man was God's law and that is the foundation of the common law. It is the only legitimate law that ever has governed man.

On this earth there has always been a group of dominant people who have sought to rule over mankind. It is most difficult to physically dominate all of mankind by physical brute force alone. Control of man is much easier to facilitate if one can control the perceptions, beliefs, and the minds of man. To do that one must shape and form what the common man believes. 

Man must be taught to believe and accept certain premises which facilitate his domination and ease the physical control. Man had to be taught to be "obedient" and obedience had to be taught as virtuous. 

The word government itself describes its purpose and intent.

To govern means "to control". Ment comes from the word "mente" which pertains to the mind, or mental. So government is the word created to describe the control of man's mind to facilitate domination. Once the mind control ceases to work all that is left is the brute force over the muscle of man. We are beginning to see the failure of the mind controls as the lies and deceptions become more and more widely known. The result of this loss of the mind control is the increased use of force. One only needs to look around the country to see it manifesting.

Now, we have looked at a bit of the historical past, what law meant to the colonists, what law really is, what was brought onto the shores and implemented into the states in the 60's, and had a brief look at where we stand today. Now let's look more closely at some of the reasons why.

As the merchant law was adopted into all the states all actions within the country became "actions in commerce". The tricks used to manifest that into the legal system involve quite a number of tricks, deceits, frauds, and a great many "operations of law" as they are called. (although they have nothing at all to do with the law) Codes are called "codes" for a reason; it is because they are written in "code". It is called legalese, is written by BAR members using words of art or "terms", in which the meanings of words used in common everyday language are changed to mean something entirely different than the common man assumes them to mean.

A number of things have to be understood as we proceed down this road. First, the legal concept of the corporation. It is fairly commonly known that a corporation is what is known as a "legal fiction". It is also called a legal "person", or "fictional person". The corporation is in fact, a FICTION. A fiction is something that does not really exist. Simple enough, so far.

The next thing to realize is the maxim in law that "the law can create the fiction, but the fiction cannot create the law." GET THAT? 

The next thing people need to realize is that virtually all the various governments have been incorporated. The UNITED STATES is the parent corporation and the states are now agencies thereof as they incorporated as subsidiaries or franchises of the parent. The counties and cities fall right under the states and the parent.

So, government is now essentially one giant corporate pyramid of "for profit" commerce. They are all linked at the hip financially and the motive is profit. The profits come from the people as the people are the only true source of wealth generation via their time and labor. The trick is how to make controlling and dominating these worker bees to maximize profits.

CRIME PAYS. 

If the reader will recall early in this presentation I said that if you were injured you would file a "claim" against the wrongdoer. That was the old system. In the new system they get pretty excited if you should mention you wish to file a "claim". 

The new system demands that the injured party file a "complaint" with the authorities. The compliant is what one might call a subrogation of ones rightful claim. It assigns the rights of the damaged party to recover his damages from the wrongdoer over to the state/county/government corporation. They then claim to be the injured party, hence the STATE OF vs. accused.

They will them prosecute and make every effort to achieve a conviction of the accused. As the injured party you can forget recovering your damages or losses from their prosecution. In their system of commerce it is about making money for the company. They do this by issuing a number of bonds on the accused. They issue BID BONDS, PERFORMANCE BONDS, AND BAIL BONDS. You, the damaged party become a victim of the corporate state in addition to being the victim of the wrongdoer. There are no reparations to you nor recovery of loss. YOU BECOME THE VICTIM OF DOUBLE JEOPARDY.

Those bonds are then sold in the markets on Wall Street and make up a part of the market known as derivatives. They, the corporate state, make money by imprisoning people. Corporations have been set up which are also paid handsomely to house these folks and many of the inmates do work in prison for other corporations working for as little as 25 cents per day.

What's worse is that the corporations running the prisons pay incentives to so-called judges and prosecutors for filing charges, achieving convictions, and keeping prisons full by sentencing.

The accused no longer has a jury of his peers, but a jury of ignorant people who know neither the law nor the accused. The juries now follow the orders of the court administrator and no longer serve as law makers or authorities. 

The details of all this are not the point. The point is that crimes pays. The corporations are profiting from crime. They are making billions upon billions of dollars on traffic citations of all sorts. The amount of money they take in is absolutely staggering. I saw a figure a few months back on the amount the state of Texas took in, in just one year, from seat belt violations and it was in the billions of dollars! 

Just for the record since it is a bit off the subject; traffic citations are actually quite unconstitutional on their face because they are what the constitution refers to as "bills of attainder". At the time the constitution was written "bills of attainder" were outlawed because in old England a bill of attainder usually carried a death sentence. What a bill of attainder is boils down to a legislature claiming that if someone does a certain act that they are guilty of a crime. Hence, if your are speeding you are claimed....by the legislature to be guilty of a crime and hence must be punished. That is assigned guilt by legislative fiat or decree.

The modern day "for profit" bill of attainder is more properly called a "bill of pains and punishment", but is still a form of a bill of attainder wherein the legislature has deemed one guilty and punishable due to an act declared punishable by legislative fiat.

The point is that these are profits to the corporations. There are quite a number of problems inherent in this system. For one; they are NOT motivated to eliminate crime but rather create the profit incentives to encourage it. How do you encourage it? By passing more and more ludicrous regulations; so many in fact that no one can possibly exist one day without violating some of those rules.

Ask any cop and they will tell you that they know that if they follow you long enough they can find you in violation of "something" and, if not, they can always pull you over and create something. It is commonly called escalating the stop. They can make accusations, false charges, and even claim you resisted arrest. 

There are actually many reasons for the war on drugs, but if you consider the millions of people imprisoned and the millions of dollars in profit generated from that, you can see another very big reason why this is really big business for the corporate state.

More criminals, more fines, more excuses to make false claims or false charges and the people become the prey. The law enforcement officers stopped being peace keepers and became revenue generators for the corporate state. Their new role under this system of commerce is to not only sustain a steady flow of revenue into the coffers of the corporate state but to find ways to increase them. THAT is doing their job and it has nothing at all to do with serving the public or fighting crime. Those days are long gone.

Preventing crime is NOT in their best interest. An injured party is nothing to them but a potential source for subjugation of rights for another prosecution to benefit the state. The injured party can forget reparations under this system because all proceeds go to the state. 

The problems we now see on the street exceed even the absurdity of these predators seeking to generate revenues on the backs of the people. Now people are being cowed and subdued with increasingly obnoxious and abhorrent behavior on the part of these "officers" all over the country. 

People are now being treated worse than criminals and slaves. They are being treated with disdain and total disregard of their humanity and it is becoming increasingly clear that the agenda underlying this is in fact anti-human as it places no value whatever upon a human life.

So, it is now worse than simply violating the rights of the people; now it is life threatening in scope. You will provide booty and revenue to the pirates gladly, willingly, and submissively or suffer the consequences. 

Logic could lead one to that conclusion without the obvious shows in violence and aggression, but for those who could not make the trip previously, it is becoming painfully obvious. Gone are the days that one could "assume" that someone shot by a cop had deserved it. Most likely in this day and age they did nothing at all to merit being shot or killed. In fact, the chances are quite good that they were minding their own business or that the corporate state singled them out for not begging or groveling at the feet of one of their thugs.

We recently had an elderly man in a nursing home shot and killed by cops because the nurses called the cops on the man when he refused to take any more drugs. Just last week we had a teen killed by cops after his dad called them to teach his son, who he had been arguing with, a lesson. Lesson learned; don't call the jack booted thugs for help. The stories are endless. Tragic indeed. But, we still have not gotten to the crux of these problems.

How did they start and how did they progress to this point? Well, most are busy trying to fix government because they see government issues as the problem....either it is broken, corrupt, too big, out of control, any number of reasons. Everything about the system is wrong, immoral, unlawful, unjust, and purely criminal.

Most of the error is unfortunately rooted in the people themselves. I know, you've probably heard that vague remark before. This piece is going to get more specific, but that is where our biggest problem lies.

It goes way back into earth history and precedes the formation of the American colonies. The dominating forces over man have long existed on this planet and mankind has simply yet to determine the truth. Our founders actually got close with the Articles of Confederation, but they still missed the boat.  

We already covered that government means mind control. Mind control amounts to nothing but manipulation through the controlled or manufactured perceptions of man. It boils down to creating and maintaining a set of beliefs built around faith or instruction without understanding of the underlying truth of what actually IS. ie...just take our word for it....it is necessary....it is for your own good....it is what is best for the collective whole...but, just trust us on this. Listen to the "experts" and let them decide for all.

So, the wisdom for the premise of allowing or creating a "government" to begin with escapes me as there is no logic in it for mankind. That said, we'll start with the founders and where we have gone wrong since then.

Keep in mind that the founders never did believe that "government" was lawmaker for, or over, man himself; that is not self-government. Legislative law making has come to pass since the founding of the country and made possible by the acceptance of the concept by the people themselves.

In the halls of the controllers all of what I am going to discuss is known and fully understood. It is only the uninformed masses of the people who fail to understand the truth. In studying the law and the court cases over the years their actions using operations of law make it obvious they understood the truth because they cleverly figured out ways using their merchant law to circumvent the real law of the land.

It is all perfectly "legal" but then legal and lawful are two entirely different things. Legal is also known as public policy and pertains to corporate affairs or concerns.

The big problem is not merely government itself but the "BELIEF" held by people that there is an authority over them outside, or in addition, to God. Man was never "lawfully" required to answer to anyone besides his creator. All other entities claiming to have authority over man are interlopers and charlatans. Man accepts their claimed authority at his own peril and risk.

In the first place man was never answerable to any other man nor any of man's created fictions. What has happened is that people in this country have not only accepted that the government can regulate them or make rules with which to fleece them but they actually "believe" this authority is legitimate. Man has accepted being commanded and ruled over by other men to his detriment.

For the authority to be legitimate it would have had to have come from God and the authority would have had to have been delegated by God to someone. I realize that there are people in the world claiming that god created government and that consequently government must be obeyed. That is ludicrous on its face and an obvious lie.

Long before there was government God set out what we know as the 10 commandments. To name a few, he said you should have no other Gods, that thou shall not steal, thou shall not kill, thou shall not bear false witness, nor covet thy neighbors property.

All one has to do is look around at the atrocities committed by government and one will quickly see that governments are far and away the worst violators and offenders of God's laws. So, it seems highly unlikely that God authorized or created an entity which would in turn violate all his commandments. They are the absolute worst violators of God's laws and are nothing but law breakers.

So, the claim God created this criminal enterprise is absurd on its face, but if that is not sufficient, we have the documents proving how and when government was created by men. If that is still insufficient one should consider that the name is merely a word and does not represent a real thing. It is a concept behind which a group of individuals act together as a gang.

The theory was that government was necessary "to protect the rights and property of men". The problem is that the minute the gang of individuals claiming to be government violated one of God's laws, or the common law of the land, government became nothing more than organized crime run by a gang of thugs and gangsters making their own rules, calling them "laws",  and enforcing them at the point of a gun. Call it what it is....rule by force.

It is little different than some of the old west towns where the merchants got together and hired a gunfighter to be sheriff to protect them and he turned around and became the thug collecting protection money from all the spineless merchants in the town and hence became their worst nightmare.

We are now faced with a corporation, which is a fiction, controlling and commanding real men, and claiming the legitimate authority to write their own rules enabling expanded theft from the spineless public. They have created their own courts and have hired muscle on the streets to generate increasing revenue streams using the money they confiscated from the spineless merchants.

There are those statists who claim that the authority claimed by this fictional entity called government comes from "we the people" and that because we elect them that we have delegated the authority to act in the name of the people.

That is just as absurd a claim as the claim that God created this behemoth. In the first place NO MAN can delegate an authority he does not have himself. God never gave any man the authority to violate his commandments, rob another man, kill another man, torture another man, in an act of aggression against his neighbor.

I have no right to rob my neighbor and I cannot lawfully delegate such a right to anyone else to do it in my name. It does not matter what name you wish to place on the entity...I cannot lawfully delegate a right I do not have. So, NO, government does NOT REPRESENT ME nor is it of me, for me, or by me. I doubt it represents you or your wishes either! 

So, the people could not have authorized government to rob their neighbors with taxes, fines, or fees. They could not have authorized government to start wars on neighboring countries or assassinate world leaders, or steal from other countries or peoples. 

The sad and glaring contradiction is that people actually accept...and "believe" that government actually does have authority to do all their dastardly deeds. 

We have come down, at last to the real underlying problem. The BELIEF that people have accepted all their lives that government actually has ANY LAWFUL OR LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY over man. It is the belief that enables all that man is being subjected to. All the wars, genocides, poverty, starvation, and chaos are not prevented by governments, but created by them.

It is that belief in a false claim of legitimate authority that allows politicians to act lawlessly and dictate their every whim and to declare wars and act pre-emptively against other countries. It is that belief in authority that will soon allow people to accept the punishment of pre-crime just as we have accepted attacking other countries "pre-emptively". It is that belief which enables these mini-dictators to do their dastardly deeds and escape all sense of personal responsibility and accountability for their acts and deeds.

The politicians claim they are just doing their jobs, just as the police do, and that they cannot be held responsible as individuals because they did it in the name of government. This whole concept goes back to officers of corporations acting in the name of a fictional entity to avoid personal responsibility or accountability for their dastardly deeds. It completely dodges personal responsibility for damages and harm done. 

Since the law of the land, the common law, demands that one do no harm, ANY act conceived of which serves to circumvent the requirement of the law of personal responsibility for one's acts as an individual is criminal in its inception. It violates the law and is breaking the law. That is why corporations are unlawful shields serving the sole purpose of allowing the law to be broken. 

All governments, federal, state, county, and city which have become corporations participating in this scheme of plunder are criminal and law breaking institutions behind which gangsters and thugs hide to avoid personal responsibility for their acts as individuals.

We have allowed ourselves to find and accept ways and excuses for escaping personal responsibility and these escapes set us up for what we now face. If one goes back to the concept of the corporation it is easy to see.

Why does one set up a corporation? Most people know why. It is a shield. It is to protect the owner(s) and/or stockholders and their assets from any personal liability. 

What was the common law about? It was about doing no harm. It was do no damage....AND...if you DID do some damage you were held personally liable and responsible for making the injured party whole again. It kept people accountable, honest, careful, and considerate....as well as LAW ABIDING.

When people hide behind a shield in order to avoid being held personally responsible or accountable for their actions then they refuse to abide by the law. Forming a corporation to protect ones assets is essentially hiding ones assets from any damaged party and enabling oneself to walk away from harm unscathed and make a profit at the expense of the injured. It is to leave the injured party injured for your personal gain, or preservation of gains, at their expense.

Using the veil or cloak of government allows dominating men to plunder the world and avoid personal responsibility for their actions as individuals. Cops put on a costume and a badge and hide behind a cloak of perceived authority to commit all sorts of inhumane and atrocious acts and they too "believe" that this illegitimate false authority relieves them of all personal responsibility for their actions as individuals. The problem is that the system covers for them and permits it....indeed encourages it.

But ALL of us need to see through this veil of false authority claimed by these domineering controlling dictators over men. They are law breakers...not law makers.

We have become lost as a people because we are confused and conflicted. When we dodge God's law, we are law breakers. When we avoid personal responsibility for our actions or damages to our fellow man we join the criminals and become law breakers and part of the "Gang". For the LAW says do no harm and protecting oneself at the expense of those we damage is not a responsible act.

Government only exists because of the willingness to believe it is a real and legitimate entity with the divine right to rule over man. But, we have already covered that God could not have delegated such authority nor could man. Therefore any such claim is totally bogus and false. If the claim is false and the evidence proves the criminality of their actions then accepting the belief that government is necessary, legitimate, lawful, or beneficial is an irrational conclusion.

All governments boil down to a master/slave relationship at some level. It is a command and control system created by dominant men as a device to manipulate and control the many by the few.

We have been taught all our lives to "believe" the lies supporting the command/control system to create our acceptance of it. The truth is that when you carefully consider the facts, the truth, and the evidence they do not support the claims made to support the concept. The problem is that we still believe in it in spite of that.

It is the "belief" that this perceived authority of government really exists that corrupts the hearts and minds of men. In evaluating it closely you find that it is, at its core, anti-human and the natural progression of this, if extended out, is eventual death and destruction of humanity.

For those who doubt that, you need only consider how much more death and suffering exists in the world today than existed only a few decades ago. Governments are the biggest source of chaos, bloodshed, wars, mass suffering, theft, injustice, and are the primary driving force in dumbing down the people while destroying all real law, morality, humanity, our families, our unity, and the peace. All the wars of the last century have been caused by the ruling classes in "government" and have cost the lives of millions of innocent victims. Such atrocities would never be possible in the absence of this false belief in a right to rule.

There is no valid argument supporting the existence of the concept; not one. Every single argument offered to support this concept is rooted in lies. But, if one cannot see that it is rooted in lies, the evidence of the failure of all forms of government is all around us to see with one's own eyes.

You cannot "fix" government. It is the acceptance of the concept at all that is the problem. As long as government exists at all it will always be the source of the world's biggest problems.

We do not need to destroy or attack government either. In fact, it does not exist to begin with. The buildings and people are there but there is no "government". Just gangs of individuals enforcing their will upon others at gun point. 

All forms of government ever devised served only to transfer the wealth and labor of the many to the controlling few. That is and always has been the bottom line truth. God gave no man the authority to control another man. 

It was always a few dominating men who convinced others of the need for the people to allow man to control other men. It is a foolish concept. People claim they fear and cannot trust their neighbor but believe they can then elect their neighbor to rule them. That thinking is self-contradictory, illogical and irrational.

It is the willingness of the people to accept that although "they" cannot and should not break the law, that it is quite okay....indeed even necessary....for some fictional entity to break all laws...as long as it is in the name of their newly accepted God called government. 

That is a double standard of morality and it is the source of most of man's biggest problems. Most people accept that it is unlawful to stick a gun in their neighbors face and rob him, but if a gang of thugs does so and claims it is the government or calls it taxes, then people accept it as lawful. In that case any highwayman can rob anyone; all he needs to do is to convince the people he has the authority to do so and create a name for that veiled authority. Indeed call it patriotic to submit to the robbery!

Once the people are convinced that the "authority" exists the highwayman has a license to steal. If he can take 30 percent or forty percent, what is to keep him from taking it all and what is the difference?

The plain and simple truth is there IS NO entity known as government. There is ONLY a gang of people masquerading as authority and acting as lawless criminals. They write their own laws to benefit their designs upon mankind and the people think those bandit's laws are legitimate even though they violate God's laws which the people are well aware of.

These things are not possible without the "belief" in the false authority by the people themselves. 

These people masquerading as authority cannot and do not write laws. It is a fictional entity they claim to hide behind and fictions cannot write law. The maxim of law is that while law can create a fiction (such as a corporation) a fiction cannot make real law.

Corporations and government therefore CANNOT make laws over man. They can ONLY make corporate or government "policy" and those "policies" do not apply to ANY real man except perhaps those working for the corporation. What they write is policy, statutes, codes, Acts, but they are NOT REAL LAW and thus DO NOT apply to real living breathing people.

The danger, however, is that people as a whole "believe" these corporate rules apply to them and they in turn demand compliance by all their fellow men so the sheep end up policing the sheep and enforcing unlawful legislative action upon their fellow man. 

Once again we find that the people have been duped and deceived into believing something that does not exist because they base their opinions and beliefs on what they are told rather than the truth and the knowledge of what really exists.

One cannot go through life basing their beliefs on lies and untruths nor upon blind faith and expect to be free or to prosper. One cannot be a living contradiction and live without conflict.

It is insanity to fear one's neighbor and yet trust him to rule you and to tell you what your truth should be or what you should believe.

There is no substitute for independent thinking and personal research in an effort to know and understand the truths in life. As long as people refuse to know and prefer to accept what they are told by those who seek to control and enslave them, they will always be someone's slave and victim.

It is the beliefs of the people and the willingness to accept the contradictions and law breaking of the gangs that lead man to the slaughter. No doubt there are those who understand the deceit and the truth who yield up their life's work begrudgingly out of fear because the crooks do have the guns and are willing to use them. That is a pity and it makes mice out of men. Worse it allows the system to perpetuate itself through the continued support of the masses and submits our posterity to continued and worsening enslavement.

neo

Is this the America you want to live in?

Veteran Attacked By Police During Syria Protest

Found here:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/veteran-attacked-by-police-during-syria-protest/

How The Corrupt Establishment Is Selling Moral Bankruptcy To America

August 13, 2013 by Brandon Smith 

Morality is a highly misunderstood component of human nature. Some people believe they can create moral guidelines from thin air based on their personal biases and prejudices. Some people believe that morality comes from the force of bureaucracy and government law. Still, others believe that there is no such thing; that morality is a facade created by men in order to better grease the wheels of society.

All of these world views discount the powerful scientific and psychological evidence surrounding Natural Law — the laws that human beings form internally due to inherent conscience, regardless of environmental circumstances. When a person finally grasps inborn morality, the whole of the world comes into focus. The reality is that we are not born “good” or “evil.” Rather, we are all born with the capacity for good AND evil, and this internal battle stays with us until the end of our days.

Every waking moment we are given a choice, a test of our free will, to be ruled by desire and fear, or to do what we know at our very core is right. When a man silences his inner voice, the results can be terrible for him and those around him. When an entire culture silences its inner voice, the results can be catastrophic. Such a shift in the moral compass of a society rarely takes place in a vacuum. There is always a false shepherd, a corrupt leadership that seeks to rule. Rulership, though, is difficult in the face of an awake population that respects integrity and honor. Therefore criminals must follow these specific steps in order to take power:

Pretend To Be Righteous: They must first sell the public on the idea that they hold the exact same values of natural law as everyone else. The public must at first believe that the criminal leaders are pure in their motives and have the best interests of the nation at heart, even if they secretly do not.

Pretend To Be Patriotic: Despots often proclaim an untarnished love of their homeland and the values that it was founded upon. However, what they really seek is to become a living symbol of the homeland. They insist first that they are the embodiment of the national legacy, and then they attempt to change that national legacy entirely. A corrupt government uses the ideals of a society to acquire a foothold, and when they have gained sufficient control, they dictate to that society a new set of ideals that are totally contrary to the original.

Offer To “Fix” The Economy: Tyrants do not like it when the citizens under them are self sufficient or economically independent. They will use whatever methods are at their disposal including subversive legislation, fiat currency creation, corporate monopoly and even engineered financial collapse in order to remove the public’s ability to function autonomously. They will begin this process under the guise that the current less-controlled and less-centralized system is “not safe enough,” and that they have a better way to ensure prosperity.

Offer To Lend A Hand: Once the population has been removed from its own survival imperative and is for the most part helpless, the criminal leadership moves in and offers to “help” using taxation and money creation, slowly siphoning the wealth from the middle class and raising prices through inflation. Eventually, everyone will be “equal”; equally poor that is. In the end, the whole nation will see the rulership as indispensable, for without them, the economy would no longer exist and tragedy would ensue.

Create External Fear: Once in place, the criminal leadership then conjures an enemy for the people, or multiple enemies for the people. The goal here is to create a catalyst for mass fear. When the majority of people are afraid of an external threat, they will embrace the establishment as a vital safeguard. When a society becomes convinced that it cannot take care of itself economically, little coaxing is required to convince them that they are also not competent enough to take care of their own defense. At this point, the establishment has free reign to dissolve long cherished freedoms while the masses are distracted by a mysterious threat hiding somewhere over the horizon.

Create Internal Fear: They move the threat from over the horizon, right to the public’s front door, or even within their own home. The enemy is no longer a foreigner. Now, the enemy is the average looking guy two houses over, or an outspoken friend, or even a dissenting family member. The enemy is all around them, according to the establishment. The public is sold on the idea that the sacrifice needed in order to combat such a pervasive “threat” is necessarily high.

Sell The People On The Virtues Of Moral Relativism: Now that the populace is willing to forgo certain liberties for the sake of security, they have been softened up enough for reprogramming to begin. The establishment will tell the people that the principles they used to hold so dear are actually weaknesses that make them vulnerable to the enemy. In order to defeat an enemy so monstrous, they claim, we must become monstrous ourselves. We must be willing to do ANYTHING, no matter how vile or contrary to natural law, in order to win.

Honesty must be replaced with deceit. Dissent must be replaced with silence. Peace must be replaced with violence. The independent should be treated with suspicion. The outspoken treated with contempt. Women and children are no longer people to be protected, but targets to be eliminated. The innocent dead become collateral damage. The innocent living become informants to be tortured and exploited. Good men are labeled cowards because they refuse to “do what needs to be done,” while evil men are labeled heroes for having the “strength of will” to abandon their conscience.

Thus, the criminal leadership makes once honorable citizens accomplices in the crime. The more disgusting the crime, the more apt the people will be to defend it and the system in general, simply because they have been inducted into the dark ceremony of moral ambiguity.

The actions of the state become the actions of all society. A single minded collectivist culture is born, one in which every person is a small piece of the greater machine. And, that which the machine is guilty of, every man is guilty of. Therefore, it becomes the ultimate and absurd purpose of each person within the system to DENY the crime, deny the guilt, and make certain that the machine continues to function for generations to come.

Though we have already passed though most of the above stages, Americans are still not yet quite indoctrinated into the realm of moral relativism. This is, though, swiftly changing.

The Current Sales Pitch

Just take a look at the attitude of the Barack Obama Administration and the mainstream media towards Edward Snowden and his recent asylum approved by Russia.

The White House, rather than admitting wrongdoing in its support for the NSA’s mass surveillance of American citizens without warrant, or even attempting to deny the existence of the PRISM program, is now instead trying to promote NSA spying as essential to our well being, and wag a shaming finger at Snowden and the Russian government for damaging their domestic spy network. Obama lamented on Russia’s stance, stating that their thinking is “backwards.”

Did I miss something here? I’m no fan of the Russian oligarchy, but shouldn’t Obama and most of the NSA (let alone every other Federal alphabet agency) be sitting in a dark hole somewhere awaiting trial for violating the Constitution on almost every level? Yet, we are instead supposed to despise Snowden for exposing the crime they committed and distrust any country that happens to give him shelter?

Due to public outcry, Obama has attempted to pacify critics by announcing plans to make NSA mass surveillance “more transparent”. First, I would like to point out that he did not offer to end NSA spying on Americans without warrant, which is what a President with any ounce of integrity would have done. Second, Obama’s calls for more transparency have come at the exact same time as the NSA announces its plans to remove 90 percent of its systems administrators to make sure another “Snowden incident” does not occur.

Does this sound like an agency that plans on becoming “more transparent”?

Second, would Obama have called for ANY transparency over the NSA whatsoever if Snowden had never come forward? Of course not! The exposure of the crime has led to lies and empty placation, nothing more.

In the meantime, numerous other political miscreants have hit the media trail, campaigning for the NSA as well as other surveillance methods, bellowing to the rafters over the absolute necessity of domestic spy programs. Fifteen years ago, the government would have tried to sweep all of this under the rug. Today, they want to acclimate us to the inevitability of the crime, stating that we had better get used to it.

Their position? That Snowden’s whistleblowing put America at risk. My questions is, how? How did Snowden’s exposure of an unConstitutional and at bottom illegal surveillance program used against hundreds of millions of innocent Americans do our country harm? Is it the position of the White House that the truth is dangerous, and deceit is safety?

I suspect this is the case considering the recent treatment of military whistleblower Bradley Manning, who has been accused by some to have “aided Al Qaeda’s recruiting efforts”through his actions.

How did Manning do this? By releasing information, including battlefield videos, that were hidden from the public containing proof of U.S. war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Perhaps I’m just a traditionalist and not hip to modern diplomatic strategy, but I would think that if you don’t want to be blamed for war crimes, then you probably shouldn’t commit war crimes. And, if you don’t want the enemy to gain new recruits, you should probably avoid killing innocent civilians and pissing off their families. Just a thought.

So, just to keep track, U.S. government commits war crimes, but is the good guy. Bradley Manning exposes war crimes, and is the bad guy. Moral relativism at its finest. Moving on…

The shift towards moral bankruptcy is being implemented in the financial world as well. Investors, hedge funds, and major banks now surge into the stock market every time the private Federal Reserve hints that it may continue fiat stimulus. When bad news hits the mainstream feeds, people playing the Dow casino actually cheer with glee, exactly because bad economic news means more QE from the Fed. They know that the Fed is artificially propping up the markets. The Fed openly admits that it does this. And they know that our fiscal system is hanging by a thin thread. And you know what, very few of them care.

The Fed created the collapse with easy money and manipulated interest rates, and now, some people cheer them as the heroes of the U.S. financial structure.

The American narrative is quickly changing. There has long been criminality and degeneracy within our government and the corporate cartels surrounding it, but I believe what we are witnessing today is the final step in the metamorphosis that is totalitarianism. The last stage accelerates when the average citizen is not just complicit in the deeds of devils, but when he becomes a devil himself. When Americans froth and stomp in excitement for the carnival of death, and treat the truth as poison, then the transformation will be complete.

-Brandon Smith

Brandon Smith is the founder of the Alternative Market Project, an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for barter and mutual aid. Join Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the unstable mainstream system and build something better. You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com

My Comments:
The hierarchy of law starts at the top, with the Divine author.  Positive Divine Law is the first part of law that the people Brandon is talking about try to erase from their memory and conscience. Some spend decades trying to destroy that little voice, and the very first laws they try to forget are the Ten Commandments.
Those are the highest law because they were authored by our Creator who keeps all things in existence by a mere act of His Holy Will.
The next laws, are the natural laws which He put into spin when he created this world and the universe. They are what we have to deal with on a daily basis, and what Brandon is talking about in this article.
The lowest laws are the man made laws, including Church law, Constitutional laws, civil and criminal laws, and down to the lowest at the local level, ordinances.
All of this body of lower law is now corrupted according to the will of corrupt politicians. The only part of this body of law that still claims credence in God's eyes is the common law which is not being followed at all in this world.
So Brandon is dead right as far as his article goes, and it's a good lesson to train one's conscience in all this law. Once we get our feet on the ground we have some place to stand, and the higher laws should provide that moral ground. So pray and study, and don't let these evil people confuse you about what is good or evil.
Paul