International Public Notice: Israel is Not a State

 By Anna Von Reitz

"Israel" is the name of a chunk of land in the Middle East rented as a holdover from the former British Protectorate by Jacob Rothschild using a 99 year lease which is now expired. 

Seeking to promote a similar protectorate status, the United States of America, Incorporated, has apparently granted Israel status as a State-of-State and used the old "Confederate State" confusion to make it appear that Israel is a State of the Union.  

Everyone needs to learn that a State is geographically defined and holds complete general jurisdiction over the land, soil, water, and air within its borders. 

A "Confederate State" sometimes erroneously referred to as a "State" is in fact a "State of State" or instrumentality of a State used to conduct business. 

Such State of State entities are not necessarily run by the State employing them, but may be run by separate subcontractors -- as in the current situation in this country, where we find that British Territorial States of State organizations have been hired under dubious conditions and substituted for our American States of State organizations.  

The habit of loosely calling these organizations "States" has contributed to much mischief and misunderstanding and needs to be fully explicated. 

There may be a "State of Israel" in the same sense that there is a "State of Alabama", but neither of these entities is a State of the Union.  Both are instead "Confederate States" run as business franchises by foreign subcontractors -- and are not actual States like Alabama, Florida, Minnesota, and Wyoming. 

The actual business structure is that a British Territorial Corporation doing business as the United States of America, Incorporated, has established fifty franchise corporations each doing business as "the State of _________".  

These entities came in after The American Civil War and substituted themselves for similar American entities doing business as, for example, The State of Oregon, which was secretly replaced by the British Territorial entity, the State of Oregon. 

Could the British Territorial corporation doing business as the United States of America, Incorporated, add another franchise called "the State of Israel"?  Certainly, it could. 

But that would not make Israel a State of the Union, and in fact, no delegated power ever granted to the British Territorial United States nor to the United States of America, Incorporated, ever allowed these entities to enroll a Territory as a State of the Union.

This is why the Western States (and West Virginia which was formed as a Territory in 1863) had to wait to enter full Statehood until our actual States were brought back into Session to enroll these Territorial States as States of the Union -- action that finally took place as of the first of October 2020. 

See The Northwest Ordinance for details. 

Suffice it to say that the world is alarmed by the idea that Israel has somehow been recognized and enrolled as a State of the Union and become part of this country or even a territory of this country, which it most certainly has not. 

Any "State of Israel" that exists is a business franchise doing business as the State of Israel, Incorporated, and it is a franchise of the British Territorial United States corporation doing business as the United States of America, Incorporated. 

Let us make this explicitly clear: our country defined a specifically and particularly proportioned flag called the Title IV Flag for the use of our British Territorial Subcontractors, to be exercised in the accomplishment of the duties delegated to them by The Constitution of the United States of America. 

They have abused the intended use of that flag and have used it for the conduct of Mercenary Conflicts.  They have also used it in an extra-territorial context without our permission and that "power" was never allowed to the British Territorial Subcontractors.  

This amounts to an abuse of the Title IV Flag and an usurpation against their employers.  

The British Territorial Subcontractors dba the United States of America, Incorporated, are prohibited by omission from using our flag in any variation for any purpose unrelated to the defense of The United States of America, our unincorporated Federation of actual States, and our member States of the Union.  

They have no authority delegated from us to assume any extra-territorial power.  So under what borrowed authority have they acted? 

As our country as a whole is and has remained at peace since the War of 1812, their continued misuse of our wartime Title IV Flag is inexcusable.

When they are conducting operations related to their contract with us, and exercising delegated authority, they should be flying the American Peacetime flag using the Title IV dimensions. 

When and if they should be acting in any other capacity whatsoever, which was never anticipated nor allowed by our Constitutions, they should be flying the British flag, the flag of the Puerto Rican Commonwealth or the flag of some other state or nation employing them;  they should certainly not continue to fly our wartime flag when our country is at peace and has not declared war on any other country for generations.  

Whatever power or interest our British Territorial Subcontractors may have or think they have with respect to any incorporated franchise dba the State of Israel is simply the power that any commercial corporation might have to protect a franchise, which does not extend to the inculcation or prosecution of war against actual countries like Yemen or any  populated extra-territorial location like Gaza. 

Like so much of the bunko which we are currently addressing, neither Israel nor Palestine, strictly speaking, exist. 

"Israel" was a commercial accommodation lease held over from the British Protectorate in the post-World War I Era, and "Palestine" was another British invention that never existed in the modern world at all and did not exist in the same area and context even in the Ancient World. 

What we have is a portrait of British extraterritorial meddling and commercial fraud, misusing American military power to conduct illegal Mercenary Conflicts in other parts of the world -- and attempting to continue on this course even after they have been thoroughly investigated and found out.  

In view of the current misuse of the "State of Israel" verbiage, it is entirely possible that no actual country called "Israel" exists, and that owing to its status as a leased protectorate (at that time), no actual peace treaty related to the 1948 Arab-Israeli War exists. The entire circumstance may be another mercenary conflict glossed over by self-interested parties invoking sea treaties as a substitute for land jurisdiction treaties. 

This is to say that not only does no State of the Union called "Israel" exist, but what we have all accepted as a separate country may not exist, either. Ditto the concept of Palestine. 

While our sympathies remain with all the people of the region who existed in relative peace and harmony prior to the political and economic meddling that they have suffered at the hands of British Territorial interests and their ugly Corporate Feudalism, which views Israelis as humans (indentured servants) and Palestinians as subhumans (slaves).  

All of this elitism and subterfuge is profoundly repugnant and reminiscent of former and ugly times in the history of mankind, and having remembered the evils of feudalism, we decline to experience the evils of Corporate Feudalism. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 

January 27th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 4600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Country v. Territory

 By Anna Von Reitz

Territorial land is different in that it is held in a custodial capacity and occupies a different jurisdiction -- for example, Puerto Rico is a Territory of The United States, but politically, it is a British Commonwealth.  

So all this while, the British Raj (Territorial Government) has been acting as a British Protectorate and establishing a Territory to rule over Australia the country, using the corporations Australia, Inc. and AUSTRALIA (INC.) to administer this Protectorate, and it has been established under the idea that the people failed to set up a new government after the end of the Commonwealth. 

So, you have the country, Australia, which appears on old maps as Terra Australis (Latin version), and you have the Territorial Protectorate, also called Australia, and you have Australia, Inc. and AUSTRALIA (INC.) all in the mix. 

Here we have the country known as The United States (National) and also as The United States of America (International) and we have the United States of America (British Territorial United States) and the United States (Papist Municipality) and the United States, Inc., and the United States of America, Inc., and the UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, etc., etc. 

Between the incorporated and unincorporated versions and all these similar names, it gets very confusing, but the bottom line is: 

Australia, aka, Terra Australis, is a country. 

Australia is also the name of the territory claimed and protected by Australia.

Australia, Inc. is a British Crown Corporation.

AUSTRALIA, INC. is a Roman Municipal Corporation. 

The essential difference between "Australia" the country and "Australia" the territory, is the political status of the people who live in the country versus the political status of the persons inhabiting a separate part of the country, and to understand this, you must understand the British Caste System.  

Men and women live in the country. They have Natural and Unalienable Rights. They are free men and women.

Humans, male and female, inhabit the territory.  They are indentured servants, public or otherwise.  They have timed tours of duty. 

Corporations known as PERSONS inhabit municipal districts, parishes, etc. They are slaves, public or otherwise. 

Thus, a territory is a denigration of a country and humans who inhabit territories are a denigration of man. 

Corporate PERSONS represent a further denigration of political status. Municipal CORPORATIONS named after humans, are slaves, and so MARTIN L. FUZZBOTTLE is a denigration of the human Person named Martin L. Fuzzbottle, and this version of "Martin L. Fuzzbottle" is a denigration of the living man whose Given Name is Martin L. Fuzzbottle. 

Example, Norfolk Island is a Territory of Australia; for the period of time that Norfolk Island is Subject to Australia (in the same sense as a "British Subject") the men and women living and being born on Norfolk Island are considered to be "humans" and "Persons" with the same political status as indentured servants of members of the military during their Tours of Duty.  Like members of the military, these Persons have titles and ranks: Mister, Missus, Sergeant, Attorney, General, Doctor, The Honorable, Captain, Judge, and so on.  They are employees, paid or unpaid, of the Territorial Government. 

So, what happens when an entire country, like Australia, is reduced to the level of being a territory without the knowledge or consent of the people living there?  A form of peonage is established, in which everyone living in Australia is deemed to be a "Person" -- that is, merely a human male or female, equivalent to an indentured servant, known as a Citizen.  Their labor, land, and other assets are seized upon by the King or other Principal, and "income taxes" are imposed as a means to siphon off the value of the people's labor for the King. They excuse this as a "condition of your employment" but of course, don't necessarily bother to give you a paycheck. 

Thus, it is a form of feudal serfdom arbitrarily imposed on the otherwise free people of Australia by a foreign power, in this case, the British Territorial Government.  

Peonage has been outlawed worldwide since 1926 and in England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales, and most of the developed world, it has been outlawed for the better part of 200 years; however, they have skirted around this by pretending that this is "voluntary" and that you contractually agreed to this by filing tax reports --- albeit, without the benefit of disclosure, just as they presume that you agreed to be dubbed a "human" based on unconscionable contracts imposed upon you when you were still a baby in your cradle. 

Let's take a look at this using their dictionary so that they expose what they are up to: 

Legal definition of "country" --- Black's Law, Admiralty:  

The portion of the earth’s surface occupied by an independent nation or people; or the inhabitants of such territory.   (Here we see that "country" refers to the geographical and physical portion of the Earth we live in, whereas "territory" is a political jurisdiction that is inhabited.)

Legal definition of "territory" -- Black's Law, Admiralty

A part of a country separated from the rest, and subject to a particular jurisdiction. (Here again, a territory is a political jurisdiction, meaning that it is inchoate -- an incomplete jurisdiction separated from the actual land and soil and general jurisdiction of a country.) 

Legal definition of "inhabitant" -- Black's Law, Admiralty

One who resides actually and permanently In a given place, and has his domicile there.

Legal definition of "resident" and "domicile" -- Black's Law, Admiralty

"Resident: one who has his residence in a place. “Resident” and “inhabitant” are distinguishable in meaning. The word “inhabitant” implies a more fixed and permanent abode than does “resident;” and a resident may not be entitled to all the privileges or subject to all the duties of an inhabitant."

Additionally:  "Living or dwelling in a certain place permanently or for a considerable length of time. The place where a man makes his home, or where he dwells permanently or for an extended period of time. The difference between a residence and a domicile may not be capable of easy definition; but every one can see at least this distinction: A person domiciled in one state may, for temporary reasons, such as health, reside for one or more years in some other place deemed more favorable."

Such as a British Merchant Sailor living for a period of years in America to perform as a Customs Agent. 

In fact, in Land Law, a "resident" is equivalent to a "sojourner" --- someone passing through and merely living in a place for an undetermined length of time. This is made clear in the American "Residence Act" which provides for members of foreign governments and their families to "reside" in this country while they are here providing essential services we agreed to receive under the various Federal Constitutions.  

Now let's look at "domicile" which sheds additional light: 

"In international law, “domicile” means a residence at a particular place, accompanied with positive or presumptive proof of intending to continue there for an unlimited time. State v. Collector of Bordentown, 32 N. J. Law, 192.”Domicile” and “residence” are not synonymous. The domicile is the home, the fixed place of habitation; while residence is a transient place of dwelling. Bartlett v. New York. 5 Sandf. (X. Y.) 44.The domicile is the habitation fixed in any place villi an intention of always staying there, while simple residence is much more temporary in its character. New York v. Genet, 4 Ilun (N. Y.) 4S9."

As you can see, these definitions are wobbly at best, and probably purposefully so, to more easily facilitate the imposition of denigrated political statuses on living people--- and the accompanying Legal Presumptions of Feudalism, too. 

These venal practices have been engaged in by the British Government and the British Crown Corporation and the Holy See under a cloak of secrecy, for the simple reason that these denigrations of political status are already recognized as being both illegal and unlawful, and have been recognized as such for a long time. Such manipulation and conversion of a man's native political status is recognized as a capital crime under the Geneva Conventions and the Hague Conventions, both -- hence the need to hide their activities in Australia, America, and elsewhere behind a "cloak of secrecy".   

The pretense that acceptance of these denigrations is voluntary, while also being unconscionable, is ludicrous, and amounts to a Highwayman claiming that, "She gave me her purse."  --- at the point of a rapier.  

It is time for this nonsense to end and for the corporations and governments and the Principals responsible for these horrific practices and injustices to be brought to justice, also.  It is apparent that all three institutions-- the British Government, the British Crown Corporation, and the Holy See -- have gone rogue and have attempted to establish a form of Corporate Feudalism by which they hope to rule the entire world, effectively by denigrating the population of this planet in a manner favorable to themselves, via a surreptitious process of unlawfully converting entire countries into territories, leading to entire living populations of men and women being denigrated as "Humans" and "Persons" and then being further denigrated as PERSONS, meaning Municipal Corporations. 

The denigration pattern is as follows: 

Joseph Allen Palmer (Man) is denigrated to Joseph Allen Palmer (Territorial Person) and further denigrated to JOSEPH ALLEN PALMER (Municipal Corporation).  Australia (the Country) is denigrated to Australia (a Territory) and thence to AUSTRALIA (a Municipal Corporation). 

All this venal wordplay is worth what it is written on and needs to be expunged.  Those who have promoted this fraud scheme beneficial to themselves need to be exposed for what they are and dealt with as criminals together with the bankers that have supported them in these activities. None of this could have been done without the complicity of the banks and certain bankers who have certainly known that what they were doing was both criminal and outrageous. Their excuse that living flesh was somehow magically converted into paper and that this gave them permission to securitize flesh is in the realm of lunacy. 

Likewise, the members of the Bar Associations worldwide who have knowingly collaborated with and acted as the enforcers and implementers of this scheme against humanity must be severely dealt with.  They, if anyone, have known the basis upon which millions of false claims in commerce have been made, have known that they were involved in illegal confiscation and enforcing bills of attainder, have been aware of the noxious and logically insupportable British Caste System, and have known that there was no excuse for "conferring" any territorial status on other countries and establishing unnecessary "military protectorates" within their borders to expedite this scheme. 

And as for the military, they may not have known that the foregoing monsters had unlawfully converted them into mercenary forces, but they have cause to know it now, and they are in fact responsible for taking appropriate action to remove these false and vacated authorities, or they shall be complicit themselves and subject to prosecution for treason against these countries and people, and crimes against humanity.   

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

January 27th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 4600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

About Cash and More

 By Anna Von Reitz

Yes, the banks are running out of cash--in a sense.  The Federal Reserve Banks have been restricting delivery of FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES to the tributary banks for the past three years, causing many smaller banks to fail.  

FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES are evidence of their debt, so obviously, if they can get you to return their I.O.U. to them without actually paying for it, they are ahead of the game. 

The more FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES they can withdraw from the market and from circulation, the less their liability. 

So of course they are "failing" to produce new fiat debt note currency and withdrawing as much fiat currency as they can from circulation and cutting back on supplies to banks, too.  

And trying desperately to find a narrative that will make people willing to surrender their cash or, better yet, from their perspective, throw it away. 

Ridiculous, you say?  How about a Disease X that could be passed from hand to hand via the physical exchange of filthy lucre?  

They've already thought of that one. 

They want to get rid of FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES because they are evidence of debt.  They want to get rid of cash, too, because then they could utterly control you and limit and micromanage your lives for their benefit. 

For 160-plus years, the Federal Reserve has been selling a purported ownership interest in the labor of British Territorial U.S. Citizens (and every American in sight that they can impersonate). 

They have been siphoning off the value of our labor which is our asset as collateral backing their debt notes --- which means that they have created a system of peonage. 

Peonage has been illegal since 1926.  It is also illegal to securitize living flesh, but they have done that, too, by pretending that we magically ceased to be living men and women.

According to them, we knowingly and voluntarily adopted the status of  "humans" -- and, much to your surprise, humans are not people. 

Humans are imaginary second-class legal fiction persons. They have no Natural and Unalienable Rights, nor any Constitutional Guarantees, either. 

Instead, they have Human Rights, but as humans don't actually exist, their rights are rather sketchy, too. 

According to the Illusionists responsible for this nonsense, not only have you, average Americans, been transformed into humans, males and females instead of men and women, but you are British Subjects, too.  

According to them.  

Pardon us for thinking that we already had that discussion.  For eight years, 1776 to 1783.

On top of this, we should be grateful for the same political and social standing as indentured servants.  It could be worse.  We might be subhumans--- which don't exist, either, but having slipped one cog, what's another? 

Subhumans are the denigrated form of humans, and they are most often represented as civil servants or franchise corporations or both. They have no Natural and Unalienable Rights and no Human Rights, but are instead granted Civil Rights, which aren't really rights at all.  They are privileges. 

Privileges are granted or taken away at the whim of the Grantor.  Donald Trump suspended Civil Rights in this country with the stroke of a pen.  Poof! 

And La-Dee-Dah. 

Congress could have done the same thing, and has on occasion. 

The fundamental thing we all need to notice is that neither humans nor subhumans exist. 

It's all bunk.  And we've even nailed down precisely where the bunk came from. Two Roman Catholic Popes who died hundreds of years ago. 

Their intricate court systems are designed to coerce, fleece, and punish these phantasms -- that don't actually exist. 

Codes, statutes, regulations, ordinances, rules and mandates are all designed to control and punish these second and third-class persons that don't actually exist.  

So the courts that propose to deal with humans and subhumans are out to lunch in La-La-Land, too. 

All of this is Make Believe. A Kingdom of Lies. 

Who needs a Tin Hat and a straight jacket now?

You, or the entire membership of the American Bar Association?  

Think of the humans and subhumans at the bottom of the pile, who toil endlessly for I.O.U.s disguised as FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES that are not only never repaid, but don't even have a due date printed on them?  

It may not be happy news, but there it is.  The Truth about the modern caste system and the ego-driven insanity that creates and sustains it. 

If you want to live in a world where you are not obliged to shadowbox with someone else's delusions and pay their debts for them, too, come home to your birthright political status and run your own government:

https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org

----------------------------

See this article and over 4600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Declaration of Intervention

 By Anna Von Reitz

We, that American States and People, are the long-lost Foreign Sovereigns who purportedly disappeared 160-plus years ago-- at least, according to our self-interested Federal Subcontractors. 

They have neglected to tell the world that they "disappeared" us using phony legal scams, unconscionable contracts, and bushwah.  We were here the whole time and they were operating under a cloak of secrecy and False Legal Pretenses to defraud their employers and the lawful inheritors of this country.  

Now, having failed to start race wars, religious wars, or foreign wars, they are trying to start a "civil war" in this country, while both the corporations trying to foment this are ultimately on our payroll, are owned by the same foreign Principals, and are offering violence against us because they can no longer commandeer our assets as collateral and access our credit to pay their bills.

They have nobody to blame but themselves and their actions are thoroughly illegal and dishonorable. 

The first Bad Actor is a foreign Municipal Government Corporation doing business under various present and historical franchises as the UNITED STATES, US CORP, E PLURIBUS UNUM, GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, etc., chartered by an unauthorized "independent, international city-state" located in the District of Columbia.  

This city-state is ultimately owned and run by the UN CORPORATION (also functioning under various other names) which was first organized as a Vichy French Corporation in 1943 for the purpose of receiving and holding foreign assets stolen by the Nazis in the first four years of the Second World War.  They colluded with certain Swiss banks and Swiss bankers, most notably, USB in the West and HSBC in the East, to store their plunder.  

Large amounts of assets belonging to the seventeen still-occupied nations of Western Europe thus remained under the control of the Nazis and the Roman Catholic Church. Together, these foreign interests have created what is known as the Empire of the Cities -- small enclaves within larger nations operating independently and making their own laws as oases for organized crime, i.e., pirate bases. 

Examples include the UN Compound in NYC, both of which exist apart from New York City, Washington, DC and the Municipality of Washington, which similarly inhabit the City of Washington, DC and the District of Columbia, the Inner City of London existing within greater London, Hong Kong existing as such a city-state in Taiwan, Vatican City within Italy, and numerous other such so-called enclaves that echo the pattern of extremely small monarchies such as Liechtenstein and Monaco, which have been used as trading grounds and safe havens, like Switzerland, for otherwise outlawed criminal financial, military, religious, and racial cults. 

A civil war is a war between organized groups within the same country, however, as Patrick M. Regan notes in his book, Civil Wars and Foreign Powers about two thirds of the 138 civil wars taking place between 1945 and 2000, were instigated by or suffered intervention by foreign powers. 

These "foreign powers" have been largely misrepresented; as the illegal and immoral occupations of both the US Corp and USA, Inc. and their various franchises and iterations, have, for example, been attributed to America. 

America had nothing to do with these rampages.

Rome and Britain did. The Nazis did. Numerous European monarchies did. Various European-based corporations, both Municipal and Commercial did.

The city-state bases for organized crime are supplemented by over 950 military bases operated worldwide by the US CORP or its current iteration, NATO, and the misnamed DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, aka, DOD and PENTAGON. 

These tiny pox-like city-states mark the face of the Earth and are responsible for enabling and expediting the majority of crime on this planet. They are generally under the sway of a Satanic religious cult that was developed in the Middle East approximately 8,000 years ago during the reign of King Nimrod and Queen Semiramis --- who became honored as a goddess more familiar to us as Ashtoreth, the Great Abomination of the Bible, Astarte, Isis, Sybil, Cybele, and yes, Columbia --- as in District of Columbia. 

The devotees of this evil cult came here in search of religious freedom after a long period of violent suppression, but promptly abused this tolerance by scheming to overtake all the other religions -- Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, Hindu, Shinto, Buddhist, et alia, by unlawfully converting and overtaking these other religious organizations via a process of undisclosed incorporation. 

The Roman-affiliated parent corporation operates the Federal Civil Service in this country and directs most Federal Agencies, plus numerous STATE OF STATE franchises, which were all ultimately owned by the Pope in his former Office as Roman Pontiff.

Although the office of the Roman Pontiff has been formally dissolved and the current incumbent "Pope" Francis appears to be tasked with performing the work of the Roman Pontiff without the authority of the Pope's ministerial office being transferred to him, he is the apparent Successor for the business at hand.

We hold Jorge Bergolio, aka, Pope Francis,  the Roman Catholic Church, and its various chartered and registered corporations one hundred percent commercially and personally liable for promoting a civil war on our shores to our detriment, the actual employers of these Municipal Corporations and their own long-lost fellow Principals. 

The second Bad Actor is a British Crown Municipal Corporation, also ultimately owned by Jorge Bergolio, aka, Pope Francis, which has done business under various names as: The United States of America, Incorporated, the United States of America, Incorporated, the USA, Incorporated, and so on. 

The essence of the current conflict boils down to this: it is the contractual and moral obligation of the current version of USA, Inc. to protect our borders and secure our country from invasion. If they don't perform, they are in violation of the contracts allowing them to be in this country at all.

At the same time, the current version of US Corp is acting outside its jurisdiction and exercising powers never bequeathed to it, to prevent the USA, Inc. from doing its job. 

Thus, Bergolio is using both Municipal Corporations resident in the District of Columbia as sock puppets to promote a civil war by proxy over a border crisis created by the US Corp and its policy agreement masquerading as a treaty to create the so-called North American Union. This would involve erasing the borders between Canada, The United States, and Mexico, and thereby grossly violating the national sovereignty of all these countries. 

The catch in all of this is that the land and soil jurisdiction is not vacant and these corporations have no right or reason to do what they are doing; they are engaged in promoting an illegal Mercenary Conflict on our shores, just as they have been doing in so many other countries ever since the Second World War and they are doing this under the False Pretense that they are associated with us, are our representatives. and have our permission to tear our country apart for the sake of their wrong-headed and non-consensual policies. 

We are the only American Principals who have ever treated with Rome, those who hold the contracts, and the treaties, and who are the underwriters of this country.  

Rome and the disguised Roman Pontiff and all their corporations both Municipal and Commercial must immediately back off and respect their limited jurisdiction with respect to this country, and also recognize the limitations of corporate policies which apply only to actual employees and actual dependents --- which does not include their employers and fellow Principals. 

Likewise, the British Crown Corporation portion of this octopus-like Kingdom of Lies is castigated and reminded of its contractual obligations to us, to serve in good faith and to provide their part of our mutual defense --- not to play the carrot to the US Corp stick. 

If these Municipal Corporations want to fight, let them fight in court and let us get on about our business.  

It's clear that the Pope or his Successor "acting as" Pope, owes us good faith service and secure borders according to all three Federal Constitutions, and it behooves him to stand down Joe Biden and cease and desist all pretenses that we, the actual States and People of this country, are obligated by the actions of George W. Bush to proceed with any unification of Canada, The United States and Mexico to form any North American Union or to by any other exterior or legalistic means erase our national borders.  

Both these Municipal Corporations and their Principals are reminded that their presence here --and the conditions allowing their presence here-- are spelled out by the Residence Act.

This is our country and the Pope, the Holy See, the Vatican, and all organs of the Roman Catholic Church have cause to know that. We are intervening to prevent bloodshed and violence and an illegal Mercenary Conflict that might otherwise be promoted on our shores by Municipal Corporations that exist by our grace. 

Ditto the British Crown Corporation vendors. 

If necessary, we will call upon our traditional Allies in Russia and China for assistance to dissolve the District of Columbia altogether and be done with this continual criminal nuisance and meddling and misrepresentation by our Employees. 

All officers are advised to stop this nonsense immediately and permanently. Secure our borders as required by our contracts. 

The USA, Inc. is instructed to perform and the US. Inc. is instructed to stand down. 

It's true that Governor Greg Abbott is only the Governor of a State-of-State and an unauthorized State Trust organization.  The same can be said of the 25 (thus far) other State-of-State Governors. 

They lack the authority to speak for us, but as Principals, we can speak for ourselves to our employees: stand down and do your jobs in good faith as required. 

That means, among other things, immediately securing our borders and removing all improperly immigrated individuals back to their native countries at the expense of the corporations and Principals responsible for this mess. 

This is what happens when you lose your minds and believe that imaginary things rule the world.  

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

January 26th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 4600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.