By Anna Von Reitz
"Israel" is the name of a chunk of land in the Middle East rented as a holdover from the former British Protectorate by Jacob Rothschild using a 99 year lease which is now expired.
Seeking to promote a similar protectorate status, the United States of America, Incorporated, has apparently granted Israel status as a State-of-State and used the old "Confederate State" confusion to make it appear that Israel is a State of the Union.
Everyone needs to learn that a State is geographically defined and holds complete general jurisdiction over the land, soil, water, and air within its borders.
A "Confederate State" sometimes erroneously referred to as a "State" is in fact a "State of State" or instrumentality of a State used to conduct business.
Such State of State entities are not necessarily run by the State employing them, but may be run by separate subcontractors -- as in the current situation in this country, where we find that British Territorial States of State organizations have been hired under dubious conditions and substituted for our American States of State organizations.
The habit of loosely calling these organizations "States" has contributed to much mischief and misunderstanding and needs to be fully explicated.
There may be a "State of Israel" in the same sense that there is a "State of Alabama", but neither of these entities is a State of the Union. Both are instead "Confederate States" run as business franchises by foreign subcontractors -- and are not actual States like Alabama, Florida, Minnesota, and Wyoming.
The actual business structure is that a British Territorial Corporation doing business as the United States of America, Incorporated, has established fifty franchise corporations each doing business as "the State of _________".
These entities came in after The American Civil War and substituted themselves for similar American entities doing business as, for example, The State of Oregon, which was secretly replaced by the British Territorial entity, the State of Oregon.
Could the British Territorial corporation doing business as the United States of America, Incorporated, add another franchise called "the State of Israel"? Certainly, it could.
But that would not make Israel a State of the Union, and in fact, no delegated power ever granted to the British Territorial United States nor to the United States of America, Incorporated, ever allowed these entities to enroll a Territory as a State of the Union.
This is why the Western States (and West Virginia which was formed as a Territory in 1863) had to wait to enter full Statehood until our actual States were brought back into Session to enroll these Territorial States as States of the Union -- action that finally took place as of the first of October 2020.
See The Northwest Ordinance for details.
Suffice it to say that the world is alarmed by the idea that Israel has somehow been recognized and enrolled as a State of the Union and become part of this country or even a territory of this country, which it most certainly has not.
Any "State of Israel" that exists is a business franchise doing business as the State of Israel, Incorporated, and it is a franchise of the British Territorial United States corporation doing business as the United States of America, Incorporated.
Let us make this explicitly clear: our country defined a specifically and particularly proportioned flag called the Title IV Flag for the use of our British Territorial Subcontractors, to be exercised in the accomplishment of the duties delegated to them by The Constitution of the United States of America.
They have abused the intended use of that flag and have used it for the conduct of Mercenary Conflicts. They have also used it in an extra-territorial context without our permission and that "power" was never allowed to the British Territorial Subcontractors.
This amounts to an abuse of the Title IV Flag and an usurpation against their employers.
The British Territorial Subcontractors dba the United States of America, Incorporated, are prohibited by omission from using our flag in any variation for any purpose unrelated to the defense of The United States of America, our unincorporated Federation of actual States, and our member States of the Union.
They have no authority delegated from us to assume any extra-territorial power. So under what borrowed authority have they acted?
As our country as a whole is and has remained at peace since the War of 1812, their continued misuse of our wartime Title IV Flag is inexcusable.
When they are conducting operations related to their contract with us, and exercising delegated authority, they should be flying the American Peacetime flag using the Title IV dimensions.
When and if they should be acting in any other capacity whatsoever, which was never anticipated nor allowed by our Constitutions, they should be flying the British flag, the flag of the Puerto Rican Commonwealth or the flag of some other state or nation employing them; they should certainly not continue to fly our wartime flag when our country is at peace and has not declared war on any other country for generations.
Whatever power or interest our British Territorial Subcontractors may have or think they have with respect to any incorporated franchise dba the State of Israel is simply the power that any commercial corporation might have to protect a franchise, which does not extend to the inculcation or prosecution of war against actual countries like Yemen or any populated extra-territorial location like Gaza.
Like so much of the bunko which we are currently addressing, neither Israel nor Palestine, strictly speaking, exist.
"Israel" was a commercial accommodation lease held over from the British Protectorate in the post-World War I Era, and "Palestine" was another British invention that never existed in the modern world at all and did not exist in the same area and context even in the Ancient World.
What we have is a portrait of British extraterritorial meddling and commercial fraud, misusing American military power to conduct illegal Mercenary Conflicts in other parts of the world -- and attempting to continue on this course even after they have been thoroughly investigated and found out.
In view of the current misuse of the "State of Israel" verbiage, it is entirely possible that no actual country called "Israel" exists, and that owing to its status as a leased protectorate (at that time), no actual peace treaty related to the 1948 Arab-Israeli War exists. The entire circumstance may be another mercenary conflict glossed over by self-interested parties invoking sea treaties as a substitute for land jurisdiction treaties.
This is to say that not only does no State of the Union called "Israel" exist, but what we have all accepted as a separate country may not exist, either. Ditto the concept of Palestine.
While our sympathies remain with all the people of the region who existed in relative peace and harmony prior to the political and economic meddling that they have suffered at the hands of British Territorial interests and their ugly Corporate Feudalism, which views Israelis as humans (indentured servants) and Palestinians as subhumans (slaves).
All of this elitism and subterfuge is profoundly repugnant and reminiscent of former and ugly times in the history of mankind, and having remembered the evils of feudalism, we decline to experience the evils of Corporate Feudalism.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska
January 27th 2024
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
