The Illegal and Unlawful Securitization Fraud

 By Anna Von Reitz

Information provided to H.E. Cardinal Mamberti and the Vatican Chancery Court regarding our Claim March 6 2005, January 19 2023 in seq:

One of the primary means used to derive Unjust Enrichment from all the foregoing described fraud schemes has been securitization. 

The property assets seized upon via the False Registration processes were "securitized" and used as collateral backing debts run up by the same criminal Municipal Corporations operating out of the District of Columbia and their Territorial franchises operating as Territorial States of States and Territorial Counties, all of which were incorporated under the British Crown apparatus. 

Illegally and unlawfully, the bodies of the living Americans were mischaracterized as "cargo" of the phony British Territorial U.S. Citizen "vessels" created for them without their knowledge or consent. 

This results in enslavement and coerced obedience under force and color of law.  It also results in fraud upon the courts.  

It is patently and absolutely unlawful and illegal to securitize the flesh of a living man as an asset in trade or commerce (slavery) and it has also been unlawful and illegal to force his labor (peonage) since 1926; the brigands responsible for the current situation have hoped to avoid and evade these facts by mischaracterizing the victims as corporations, not living men --- while at the same time enforcing court judgements against these corporations as if they applied to the living men that these corporations have been named after.  

The rationale appears to be that it is not illegal or unlawful to enslave a corporation--- for that matter, it isn't illegal or unlawful to murder, rob, rape, or otherwise despoil, defraud, or maim a corporation -- and so by labeling a corporation with a living man's name, the Perpetrators responsible for this scheme have cintrived to excuse themselves and their courts by mischaracterizing the victims as corporations. 

Part of their scheme has been to seize upon American homes and land and businesses, redefine these private property assets as corporation trust assets, and then foist off the debts that the Usurpers have accumulated as mortgages owed on the trust property. 

Any would-be buyer has to pay off the mortgage owed on the trust property as a tenant, and once the mortgage is paid off, the victim can enter into a "future lease purchase agreement" --- and begin the whole process over again as a Leasor, instead of a Tenant, of the same trust property.  

This avoids the fact that there is no valid "trust" established over American land holdings, only a "presumed" trust interest being asserted by the British Monarch based on the phony birth registration process and the assumption that all these purloined Americans are British Territorial U.S. Citizens and subjects of the King. 

The "future lease purchase clause" admits that there is no sale of property involved in any mortgage transaction in this country.  The bank is renting the property out to tenants who are obligated to pay the phony government's debt on the house asset which remains in their equally phony and unjustifiable "State Trust".  

If after thirty years the victim, who is the only one to sign the mortgage, pays back all the money purportedly owed to himself (represented by the State Trust that the Perpetrators set up "for" us and manage "for" us) and pays off the mortgage owed by the Perpetrators and lodged against the assets of the State Trust, all he can get is a lease purchase agreement, because the State Trust doesn't actually own the property.  

We repeat, there is no actual sale or transfer of property interest in any mortgage transaction in this country or in Britain or anywhere else we have examined.  People are being led to believe that they are buying a home or a business or other asset, when in fact they are being bamboozled to pay off the debts owed by phony foreign property trusts and living as unsecured tenants in their own homes -- and at the end of the day, they are still only presumed to be leasing the trust property. 

We wish for all these mortgage schemes to be overturned and for anyone who isn't knowingly, willingly, and factually a British Territorial U.S. Citizen, to be released from any mortgage agreements and for their property grants, patents, and surveys to be released to their direct and permanent ownership, together with any interest in any foreign "titles" attached to the property in question. 

We wish for all the actual living property owners to be fully restored and for proper Bills of Sale to be issued to them, showing that their land is not subject to any royal trust or real estate title scheme, and not subject to any Municipal zoning scheme, either, and is in fact their land and part of their State of the Union. 

We wish for these foreign State Trusts to be dissolved and the property assets released and returned to the care and keeping of the actual owners, without encumbrances or debts.   

Put another way, all those future lease purchases need to be completed as Bills of Sale.  All the mortgages that have been created based on False Presumptions of Municipal citizenship need to be overturned and the present American owners held harmless. 

The Securitization Fraud does not, however, end with securitization of a Promissory Note and the False Presumption that the victim owes a mortgage and the equally False Presumption that the credit extended by the bank is not owed back to the victim of this scam. 

Another whole dimension of the securitization scheme involves bundling mortgages secured by promissory notes --- all obtained under conditions of deceit and non-disclosure --- and selling these bundled mortgages on to investors as separate "derivative" investments.  

Please see the attached letter from an Australian Mortgage Servicing Company which discloses the fraud and admits how this information is deliberately hidden from the presumed-to-be tenants paying on mortgages and even from the bank personnel. 

It is a horrific shame on the governments, Principals, politicians, military, corporate CEO's, and especially the banks, that this kind of crime has been allowed to run rampant for decades without being recognized, prosecuted, and stopped. 

We are also presenting a synopsis of the First National Bank of Montgomery v Jerome Daly case, which provided a permanent decision owed to all Americans facing these fraudulent Legal Presumptions and practices and the resulting false claims in commerce being practiced against them by the Municipal Corporations housed in the District of Columbia and their commercial franchises: 

RE:  First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Jerome Daly

IN THE JUSTICE COURT

STATE OF MINNESOTA

COUNTY OF SCOTT

TOWNSHIP OF CREDIT RIVER

JUSTICE MARTIN V. MAHONEY

First National Bank of Montgomery,

Plaintiff

vs

Jerome Daly,

Defendant

JUDGMENT AND DECREE

The above entitled action came on before the Court and a Jury of 12 on December 7, 1968 at 10:00 am.   Plaintiff appeared by its President Lawrence V. Morgan and was represented by its Counsel, R. Mellby. Defendant appeared on his own behalf.

A Jury of Talesmen were called, impaneled and sworn to try the issues in the Case. Lawrence V. Morgan was the only witness called for Plaintiff and Defendant testified as the only witness in his own behalf.

Plaintiff brought this as a Common Law action for the recovery of the possession of Lot 19 Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minn. Plaintiff claimed title to the Real Property in question by foreclosure of a Note and Mortgage Deed dated May 8, 1964 which Plaintiff claimed was in default at the time foreclosure proceedings were started.

Defendant appeared and answered that the Plaintiff created the money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry as the consideration for the Note and Mortgage of May 8, 1964 and alleged failure of the consideration for the Mortgage Deed and alleged that the Sheriff's sale passed no title to plaintiff.

The issues tried to the Jury were whether there was a lawful consideration and whether Defendant had waived his rights to complain about the consideration having paid on the Note for almost 3 years.

Mr. Morgan admitted that all of the money or credit which was used as a consideration was created upon their books, that this was standard banking practice exercised by their bank in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, another private Bank, further that he knew of no United States Statute or Law that gave the Plaintiff the authority to do this. Plaintiff further claimed that Defendant by using the ledger book created credit and by paying on the Note and Mortgage waived any right to complain about the Consideration and that the Defendant was estopped from doing so.

At 12:15 on December 7, 1968 the Jury returned a unanimous verdict for the Defendant.

Now therefore, by virtue of the authority vested in me pursuant to the Declaration of Independence, the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, the Constitution of United States and the Constitution and the laws of the State of Minnesota not inconsistent therewith ;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1.That the Plaintiff is not entitled to recover the possession of Lot 19, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota according to the Plat thereof on file in the Register of Deeds office.

2.That because of failure of a lawful consideration the Note and Mortgage dated May 8, 1964 are null and void.

3.That the Sheriff's sale of the above described premises held on June 26, 1967 is null and void, of no effect.

4.That the Plaintiff has no right title or interest in said premises or lien thereon as is above described.

5.That any provision in the Minnesota Constitution and any Minnesota Statute binding the jurisdiction of this Court is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and to the Bill of Rights of the Minnesota Constitution and is null and void and that this Court has jurisdiction to render complete Justice in this Cause.

The following memorandum and any supplementary memorandum made and filed by this Court in support of this Judgment is hereby made a part hereof by reference.

   BY THE COURT

        Dated December 9, 1968

Justice MARTIN V. MAHONEY

Credit River Township

Scott County, Minnesota

MEMORANDUM

The issues in this case were simple. There was no material dispute of the facts for the Jury to resolve.

Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of their interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire $14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Ansheuser-Busch Brewing Company v. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318, 46 N.W. 558.   The Jury found that there was no consideration and I agree.   Only God can create something of value out of nothing.

Even if Defendant could be charged with waiver or estoppel as a matter of Law this is no defense to the Plaintiff. The Law leaves wrongdoers where it finds them. See sections 50, 51 and 52 of Am Jur 2nd "Actions" on page 584 – "no action will lie to recover on a claim based upon, or in any manner depending upon, a fraudulent, illegal, or immoral transaction or contract to which Plaintiff was a party."

Plaintiff's act of creating credit is not authorized by the Constitution and Laws of the United States, is unconstitutional and void, and is not a lawful consideration in the eyes of the Law to support any thing or upon which any lawful right can be built.

Nothing in the Constitution of the United States limits the jurisdiction of this Court, which is one of original Jurisdiction with right of trial by Jury guaranteed. This is a Common Law action. Minnesota cannot limit or impair the power of this Court to render Complete Justice between the parties.  Any provisions in the Constitution and laws of Minnesota which attempt to do so is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and void.  No question as to the Jurisdiction of this Court was raised by either party at the trial. Both parties were given complete liberty to submit any and all facts to the Jury, at least in so far as they saw fit.

No complaint was made by Plaintiff that Plaintiff did not receive a fair trial. From the admissions made by Mr. Morgan the path of duty was direct and clear for the Jury.  Their Verdict could not reasonably been otherwise. Justice was rendered completely and without denial, promptly and without delay, freely and without purchase, conformable to the laws in this Court of December 7, 1968.

BY THE COURT

December 9, 1968

Justice Martin V. Mahoney

Credit River Township

Scott County, Minnesota.

Note: It has never been doubted that a Note given on a Consideration which is prohibited by law is void.  It has been determined, independent of Acts of Congress, that sailing under the license of an enemy is illegal.  The emission of Bills of Credit upon the books of these private Corporations for the purpose of private gain is not warranted by the Constitution of the United States and is unlawful.  See Craig v. Mo. 4 Peters Reports 912.   This Court can tread only that path which is marked out by duty.    M.V.M.

Jerome Daly had his own information to reveal about this case, which establishes that between his own revealed information and the fact that Justice Martin V. Mahoney was murdered 6 months after he entered the Credit River Decision on the books of the Court, why the case was never legally overturned, nor can it be.   

As noted, Justice Mahoney was murdered, one of the many Americans murdered since the purported end of the Civil War, by commercial mercenary thugs employed to burn the actual Americans out of their homes, ambush them, steal their property, practice illegal confiscations using private courts and foreign laws to do it, and generally engage in all manner of lawless commercial racketeering, extortion, and confiscation under False Legal Presumptions and color of law. 

This has taken place under a so-called "cloak of secrecy" yet many aspects of it have been known at least in part by people who were bought off, cowed down, or blackmailed.  

What began in Britain under Queen Victoria, who acted under the influence of Soothsayers and "Spiritualists" who claimed to put her in touch with her dead husband, was spread to The United States, and from here throughout the world --- a cancerous growth of lies and criminality promoted by deluded people and minions of the Father of All Lies. 

We wish for these crimes and their just remedies to be fully recognized and for the corporations and banks responsible to be liquidated, along with the purported public interest trusts and corporation trusts and all presumptions associated with these things, which have all been secretly misapplied to the General Public of this country and many others. 

Issued by:  Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                  The United States of America

                  In care of: Box 520994

                  Big Lake, Alaska 99652

July 4th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Corporate Trust Fraud

 By Anna Von Reitz

Information provided to H.E. Cardinal Mamberti and the Vatican Chancery Court regarding our Claim March 6 2005, January 19 2023 in seq:

Whereas all incorporated entities may be considered to be trusts to the extent that the property of shareholders is managed for them by the managers of such corporations, other corporate but unincorporated entities, are held in common and have no such character. 

Put another way, a business or other organization may be corporate, but not incorporated. 

A corporate business may acquire the character of a public or private trust by structure or other express intention, or what is far more common, by submission to a foreign sovereign power, but such a trust may not be assumed in the present case where improper actions have been taken via the practice of registering American babies as U.S. Citizens without full disclosure, and then registering what appear to be their names as Municipal Corporations under franchise as well. 

Neither of these incorporations can be allowed to exist, much less be enforced as trust obligations foisted off on clueless Americans who don't even know these trusts exist.  

This is especially true as the American Government is known to be organized as a Corporation in Common and to have an unincorporated structure created under Common Law. 

The only Public Trust created by the American Government was the Preamble Trust added to each of the respective Federal Constitutions, making the Constitutions themselves a trust obligation of our Employees and Subcontractors -- not us. 

The victims of this intricate scam were named as co-owners and co-trustees and dubbed "Authorized Representatives" of these foreign Legal Fictions named after them --- a purported office and function that they were never made aware of, and which was deliberately hidden to prevent them from repudiating it. 

Every check attached to every bank account that we have examined appears to have a signature line in the lower right corner, but upon closer examination under high magnification, what appears to be a line is actually a continuous repetition of microprint identifying the signature above it as that of the "Authorized Representative" of the  foreign corporation/trusts named after them.  

In fact, America's sovereignty is vested in its nation-states and is held in common, not in trust. 

This is why our American Congressional Delegations are composed of Fiduciary Deputies and not mere Proxy Holders, Trustees, or in the general vernacular, Representatives. 

All these legal suppositions of the existence of public trust interests and the idea that Americans were ever legitimately or voluntarily rendered wards of a British Territorial Empire and the Roman Pontiff by a process of non-disclosed registration of American babies as U.S. Citizens and US CORPORATIONS must be dispensed with. 

All the assets owed to the victims of these schemes must be returned to them --- not only the Americans, but the British peoples, the people of the former British Commonwealth and the people of the Occupied nations of Western Europe, are all owed immediate release and restitution from the offending Municipal Corporations, their actual franchises, and the Principals responsible for this unlawful activity on our shores and on the shores of many other nations. 

It's all nothing but a gigantic criminal fraud scheme. 

We have seen how the purported public trust interests of the British Monarch and the Pope have been formed as both the Municipal Corporations in the District of Columbia rushed forward in the aftermath of the so-called Civil War, seeking to claim citizenry and assets for themselves.  

The British interests misrepresented their activities as "salvage" operations and the Successors of the Holy Roman Empire Subcontractors "accepted" their share of the spoils of the British activities in the form of their own Municipal Corporation franchises set up as "dedicated debtors" which would accept the burden of war reparations owed to the British and provide the operating expenses for the Municipal Government's activities as well. 

Both the British Territorial U.S. Citizens created by the birth registration scam and the US CORPORATIONS subsequently formed to benefit both the foreign Principals were characterized as Public Trusts and a public trust interest was attached to each of these Legal Fiction Persons --- only it wasn't our public and our public trust being benefited. 

The British Territorial U.S. Citizens were assumed to be Wards of the British Monarch, and the US CORPORATIONS were assumed to be Wards of the Pope acting in his Office of the Roman Pontiff, with both the British Monarch and the Pope accepting various natural assets of the victims as trust properties abandoned in their respective jurisdictions. 

The British Municipal Corporation latched onto the corpus, that is, the physical assets of their American, British, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, Australian, Canadian.... et alia, victims, expropriating their land, their gold, their Good Names, and their physical bodies, while the Holy See attached their intellectual and energetic (labor) assets.  

All this was done to people who didn't owe either Principal a penny,  people that they were obligated under contract to serve in "good faith". 

No exigency of war can be offered as an excuse for this pillaging and plundering and latching upon American property assets, because there was in fact no war, only an illegal Mercenary Conflict.  No emergency powers can be claimed, because any emergency was caused by the Perpetrators themselves, acting in breach of trust and contract, and no consensual Emergency Powers were ever granted to them. 

The British were not engaged in any legitimate salvage operation, but were engaged in secretive inland piracy, instead.  See the open claims of enslavement and ownership in the Buck Act (1940) promoted by their Territorial Congress as preparation to excuse their illegal and unlawful press-ganging of Americans during the Second World War. 

Every American ever drafted to fight in any of the illegal Mercenary Conflicts that have been disguised and misrepresented as "Wars" was subjected to press-ganging by the British Perpetrators, and press-ganging has been outlawed for over 200 years. 

The British malfeasance and criminal misrepresentations opened up the entire opportunity for the Pope acting as the Roman Pontiff to gain all the secondary Municipal Corporation franchises and extract revenue from them through child labor contracts (see the Miller Act in this country and similar legislation enacted in other countries impacted by this scheme)  and collection of income taxes (Peter's Pence), performance taxes, and utility taxes, too.  

These taxes and fees were extracted from the actual owners of these assets by foreign Municipal Corporations acting under color of law and misrepresenting themselves as our government and our trustees.  

The British have worked hand-in-hand with the Office of the Roman Pontiff ever since King John (Lacklands) contracted with Pope Innocent as Overseer of the Church's Commonwealth lands in England just prior to the Magna Carta.  

The convenient closure of the Office of the Pontiff in 2011 in no way remedies the evils perpetuated by it  and as our American claims were already present and cured and a Regency established in England for the benefit of Great Britain and the British Territories in 1999, there can be no doubt that the assets were and are owed to us, not the banks that have been assigned to act as trustees. 

We wish for our assets to be returned to us and to our direct control; we are joined in that wish by the British Regency government and the lawful government of Terra Australis.  We are sure to be joined by other competent land jurisdiction governments, especially those in the Occupied countries of Western Europe and Japan that should have been set free and released from this criminal nonsense in 2005.  

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                 The United States of America

                 In care of: Box 520994

                 Big Lake, Alaska 99652

Issued July 4th 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Substitution Schemes - Reviewed Impacts

 By Anna Von Reitz

Information provided to H.E. Cardinal Mamberti and the Vatican Chancery Court regarding our Claim March 6 2005, January 19 2023 in seq

Throughout this long recitation of wrongs and needed corrections and causes of international and global action, substitution schemes figure heavily.  

The first substitution of a British Territorial "President" for an American Federal Republic President occurred in 1856 with the election of James Buchanan, who was, like Abraham Lincoln, a Bar Attorney, and prohibited from serving in the actual intended Presidential Office by the Titles of Nobility Amendment ratified by the States in 1819 and duly added to The Constitution for the united States of America. 

Having tested the waters with Buchanan, the Perpetrators next promoted another Bar Attorney, Lincoln, to occupy the same purloined office. 

None of this occurred with the knowledge or permission of the Federation of States or our member States.  This was all mischief and malfeasance occurring at the level of the Federal Subcontractors, and it was to have dire consequences for the Subcontractors and, because of continuing secret fraud and graft, for the country as a whole. 

The entire so-called American Civil War was an illegal Mercenary Conflict misrepresented to the people of this country and the men who fought it as a "War".  It was in fact never declared by any Congress and never settled by any Peace Treaty, because nobody in any Congress would accept the liability for it, and nobody that had authority to permanently end it was notified of any of these circumstances. 

Finally, our States were Summoned into Session in 2019 and Peace was mandated by the State Assemblies themselves, an action which obligates all Federal Subcontractors to stand down.  

Other long-delayed housekeeping was also addressed, and as of the first of October 2020, all the former British Territorial States-of-States formed in the West and also West Virginia which was formed in the midst of the Civil War under the provisions of the Northwest Ordinance, were formally enrolled as States of the Union.  

This means that all fifty (50) States are fully-fledged and formally enrolled as States of the Union and there is no longer any basis for a presumption of Territorial custody over them or their land assets. 

The proper declaration and recording and publishing of the members of the State Assemblies established their provenance and political status and inherent right to function in the capacity of the actual State Government, thus dissolving any pretense that our people voluntarily remained "at sea" and under the Territorial Government of the Queen, and also disproved any theory that the American Government is "absent" or "in interregnum".  

These events and actions have been given proper public publication and both International and Global Notice has been provided to the other Principals and their Agents. 

Other notable and less appropriate substitutions have been evident throughout our discussion of these matters set before the Vatican Chancery Court and Pope Francis.  

Substitution of British Territorial Persons misrepresenting American babies, substitution of Municipal Corporation franchises misrepresenting the estates of said British Territorial Persons, and even Derivatives of these Municipal Corporations being used to promote other schemes. 

To give brief examples:  using a gobbledygook Dog Latin sign in the form of, for example, LEONARD V OLSON --- to represent a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electrical Utility franchise corporation, or LEONARD V. OLSON to represent a Special Purpose Vehicle owned and operated by the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and all of these used as means to latch upon some other American property asset as collateral and ultimately employed as a means to coercively control and entrap a living American named Leonard Victor Olson by process of presumption and a pernicious practice abusing the Postal System to provide separate jurisdictional addresses, all employed without disclosure. 

In other words, the system is designed to deliver a bill addressed to a Special Purpose Vehicle owned by the Municipal DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION to a commercial mail address indicated by the use of all capital letters style conventions and a Zip Code, to an American living in a different jurisdiction and under a similar name, in anticipation of tricking the American into paying the bill owed by the Municipal DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and or otherwise providing a legal but unlawful basis for prosecuting the victim if he doesn't pay. 

It's all more proof in practice and evidence of grossly unlawful activity promoted and pursued and accomplished by the Municipal Corporations housed in the District of Columbia. 

The Officers of the Universal Postal Union can quickly confirm that these conventions, including the use of Dog Latin to "represent" Proper Names, have been used as mailing addresses in The United States and many other countries.  

Substitutions of foreign "Congresses" for the Congresses we are owed, and substitution of foreign delegates operating in capacities never intended to represent the American States or People, are other egregious examples of self-interested fraud, breach of trust, and other crimes, all designed to access our assets and credit for the benefit of foreign interests. 

The British Territorial "Congress" elects representatives who act as Proxies for Registered Voters who are presumed to be shareholders of their corporations and the Municipal "Congress" then produces Congressional Members representing political parties drawn from the British Territorial Congress, to act as the plenary government of an unauthorized international city-state posing as "the United States".  

None of these grafters function in the capacity of Fiduciary Deputies acting for the States and People of this country.  All of them have adopted merely presumed to exist powers and have usurped upon the actual States and People.  They are all proposing to use impersonation and different assumed capacities to confuse their role and jurisdiction so as to defraud and deprive their employers of their lawful property assets and credit. 

And this has gone on, on a secret and clandestine basis, for over 160 years.  The Americans, convinced that the people working for them were also Americans and adopting American political status, never imagined that these people were in fact working in foreign jurisdictions and operating on behalf of foreign political and economic interests, because nothing appeared to change. 

Before the Civil War, Americans received their state-level government services from The State of Ohio, for example, and after the Civil War, they received these same services from the State of Ohio.  

Did you catch the difference?  Neither did they.  

This was especially difficult to discern, because for the most part, the same people continued to provide the same services as before.  There was no distinct changing of the guard or uniform or service staff to indicate that any change had occurred at all.  The same people elected as Governors continued to serve as Governors -- albeit, acting in a different capacity and in a different jurisdiction, serving a British Territorial military government instead of the State republican government. 

Other than the change from "The" to "the", there was a confused and misrepresented flurry of writing and endorsing new State of State Constitutions. 

For example, The State of New Jersey Constitution was replaced by the State of New Jersey Constitution. 

In most cases these were identical to the old State of State Constitution, except for language about slaves and slavery --- and everyone was left to assume that the new Constitutions were required to remove those references, not to usher in an entirely different service provider and different form of government.  

The truth of what we present here and before the world is adequately demonstrated by the perpetually repeated phrase "our democracy" and references to "democracy" promoted by the governmental agencies, politicians, and members of the military, always talking about "spreading democracy" and "danger to our democracy" and so on and on, when it stands plainly on the record of every nation that our country is not a democracy.  

The fraud can hardly be more directly observed than from their own mouths and in their own words.  

The British Territorial Government was set up as both a United States Territory and a British Commonwealth.  Their Municipal Corporations are run as democracies.  That's the only "democracy" to be seen anywhere in relationship to us ---  specifically, as Federal Subcontractors hired under the auspices of The Constitution of the United States of America.  

These same dishonest and disloyal Subcontractors contrived to operate a British Territorial Municipal Corporation as a military "democracy" on our shores.  That is, their District Government usurped upon our lawful government while receiving their paychecks from our largesse, and they have acted in breach of trust and violation of their service contracts for 160 years, all under color of law and a so-called "cloak of secrecy". 

Even the men serving this junta were deceived into thinking that they were honest soldiers and sailors, when they were in fact functioning as cheap commercial mercenaries instead. 

They accomplished all this via semantic deceits, abuse of the courts, complicity of the Bar Associations, and most of all, complicity of the banks, because if the banks had refused to fund all of this murder and mayhem, fraud, duplicity, and crime --- none of it would exist.  

Our history and the history of the entire world would be completely different. 

Whereupon it is time for the banks to be held accountable. They were served Notice of this in 2005 and again every year since then, to no effect; no doubt they imagined that we were all still asleep and unaware of the chicanery seeking to change our political status while we were babes in our sleep.  

We wish for all of these banks to be liquidated in our favor, and specifically in the favor of the lawful heirs of the so-called "legacy trusts" and "historic trusts" that belong to our people and our country. 

Issued by:  Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                  The United States of America

                   In care of: Box 520994

                   Big Lake, Alaska 99652

July 3rd 2023

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Crux of the Matter

 By Anna Von Reitz

This translates as "the Cross of the Matter" --- precisely the cross that Yeshuah was made to bear, and this single small verse is that one that of all verses in the Bible encapsulates the error that has haunted mankind and ruined our days ever since. 

First Samuel 8:5

"And [the people] said unto him, Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways, now make us a king to judge us like all the nations." 

--- King James Version

This is the clan leaders of the people of Israel talking to Samuel, their prophet and High Priest thousands of years ago.  

Prior to this time they had placed their trust and leadership in their prophets and their own priests and had no secular kings, which was instead the practice common among their neighbors -- the Egyptians, the Hittites, Babylonians, Assyrians, Canaanites, et alia. 

They had placed their trust in Samuel and in his ability to communicate with God, but now that Samuel was nearing the end of his days, they had nobody to take his place. Their entire system of governance had depended on one man, Samuel, and now, they had to figure out something else --- so they elected to do what all the neighbors had done, and have Samuel elect a king to reign over them and "judge" them. 

The phrase "judge them" is peculiar and again goes to the heart of the matter.  Since Moses gave them the Commandments and then all the 620 lesser laws -- dietary laws, sex laws, contract laws, etc., --- they had been under "judgement".   Judgement doesn't exist without Law, because there is no agreed upon standard determining what is right or wrong, allowed or disallowed, within a society.  

The Jews had their standards and the Egyptians had their different standards because they all adopted different laws for themselves, and each nation also then had a King to enforce these laws.  The Kings, to begin with, were not only law-givers, but law enforcers and judges. 

Though we may trust that the tribal leaders had established rules for their people to live by and that a sort of general consensus about these rules existed long prior to Moses, and we may also trust that the coming of the Commandments had further solidified the concept of Law, the election of a King was an entirely new and different matter for the Hebrews. 

They had never had a King prior to that.  

Prior to that moment, their only King was the living God, and his directives were communicated to them by the prophets.  

This is the moment when they kicked God off the throne and allowed it to be occupied by a man.  This is when their lack of faith in their own ability to know God became paramount and overwhelmed them. 

They thought that they needed Samuel, or someone like Samuel, to act as intermediary between them and God.  They didn't believe that it was possible for God to write his law on their own hearts and communicate directly with them. 

So, they substituted a man for God, and that was their free will, and they were welcome to it.  

Ever since, men have been ruled by the wisdom or folly of other men, and their lives and the lives of their nations have suffered accordingly. 

A wise and just ruler brought them justice and plenty.  A lazy fool brought the opposite results.  A good king could be followed by a sick or profligate son.  And so it has been, on and on, with all sorts of different sovereigns, kings and queens, and even an abstraction, "the People", being crowned as the sovereign. 

Yet, all of this is a lie and a farce, akin to children playing dress-up, and putting on their parent's garb, pretending that they are grown-ups, too.  

A more mature view of this situation was arrived at by William of Normandy in the years after the Norman Conquest, who observed himself to be King, and yet a Fool, subject to Nature, struggling with lust, confusion, and insurmountable burdens.  

He also directly observed the carnage and destruction and unhappiness that his rule had wrought in the name of justice, so that even victory turned to ashes in his mouth.  

This is an evil system, he decided, one in which a man playing at being King is destroyed by the burdens of kingship, and other men worship him as a False God, and give their lives and their own sovereignty over to him. 

And so, we go back to First Samuel, Chapter Eight, Verse 5, where the Mistake was made. 

We are born with our own sovereignty, and it is taken away from us almost from the moment of our birth.  We are born connected to our Creator, needing no other man or authority standing between us to interpret or judge, but quickly, we are deluded into accepting external authority and the laws of men, which amounts to an external representation of everyone else's conscience--- or lack thereof. 

When we again embrace the wisdom and grace to let the Living God be our only King, and ask for our ears to be open only to his Voice, our hearts to answer only to his Conscience, then at last the battle will be won, and we will be able to live as we were created and meant to live.

Ah, but you say, like the Hebrews before you, how can we know -- and be sure -- that we hear the right Voice, and that we are not just following our own ego and prejudice?  

First, ask to clearly hear the Voice of your Creator.  You will be helped and guided.

Second, can you tell one radio station from another?  Aren't there always "station identifications" broadcast? 

For example, if you find yourselves in another bloody war promoted in the name of God, it's time to wonder which God?  What God? 

Third, we now know, for sure, the meaning of the frequencies of the divine broadcast.  We know that Love transmits at 528 Hz precisely.  This beacon always leads us home. It never leads us astray. 

So tune in.  Learn to recognize this frequency, and learn how to broadcast it yourself.  Yeshuah gave us many lessons to help us do this, and his example, too. 

Recently, the topic of the mistreatment of God's Messengers came up. Why do we destroy those sent to help us?  

Because we are out of attunement (another transliteration of "atonement") with them. 

Why do we splinter off and form so many different religions and follow so many different gurus and prophets? 

Because we don't recognize the one Message that is common to them all.  

We get distracted by their differences and these differences keep us enthralled, instead of seeing that every true Messenger speaks the same message to us. 

All faithful Messengers deliver the same message: love.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.