Consumer demand collapses as global economy IMPLODES, factories closing doors, freight demand plummets

 https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-09-13-consumer-demand-collapses-as-global-economy-implodes.html

 We are now watching the whiplash effect of all the mad money printing that took place during covid lockdowns, which provided the world’s central banks an excuse to prop up their Ponzi markets one last time. The flood of money and debt was stabbed into the economy like an adrenaline needle into the heart of a code blue drug junky, reanimating the corpse of the economy into something mimicking economic “activity.” But the stimulus wave has, as we all supposed would happen, set into motion a series of inevitable after effects that might be worse than just letting the corpse expire in the first place.

Now the world faces skyrocketing inflation (i.e. currency devaluation) being reflected in prices of food (up at least 40% in the grocery store and closer to 80% in restaurants, in case you haven’t noticed), energy (up 800% – 1000% across much of Europe), clothing, housing and almost everything else you can think of. With consumers at the end of their financial ropes, they are now drastically cutting back on purchases of discretionary items such as appliances, vacations and high-end cosmetics. This is causing alarm bells to sound off in the manufacturing industry where companies like Electrolux (the second-largest appliance manufacturer in the world) has announced production cuts in both Europe and the United States.

As consumer demand is plummeting, forced shutdowns of factories are also occurring due to high energy prices and supply chain disruptions. We learned yesterday, for example, that Toyota has shut down Sienna production (that’s their mini-van) for the next two years. Promised 2023 models from Dodge, Nissan, Honda, GMC, Ford and Chevy are severely lacking in availability, and we are told that much of this problem traces back to lack of transportation (rail transport, believe it or not) and parts that are unable to be sourced due to the supply chain collapse.

See the rest here:

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-09-13-consumer-demand-collapses-as-global-economy-implodes.html

Your States and Their States of States

 By Anna Von Reitz

Of all the conundrums we have to sort out (and there are many) none is more pernicious than the confusion caused by referring to State of State business organizations as “States” 

States of States, like the (Territorial) State of Wyoming, are not States. 

States are all physically defined, have landmarks and borders and populations of living people. 

States of States are businesses.  They may be unincorporated businesses owned and run by Lawful Persons or they may be incorporated or enfranchised corporations owned and operated by Legal Persons, but such businesses obviously exist on paper and are not physically defined—- and are not “States”. 

The confusion began with the Confederation formed by the original American States of States.  

The actual States had their Federation of States. 

So the States of States formed their Confederation hoping to unite their business interests. 

In the process the American States of States like The State of Georgia and The State of New York started calling themselves “Confederate States”.  

This lapsed further into calling these entities  “States” — when they are not States — and contributing to the overall confusion that people suffer with to this day. 

Businesses are not States.  Such organizations  may conduct business for a State, but that does not make them a State.  

And it must be remembered that each State is perfectly able to conduct business for itself.  The States are not obligated to form or utilize State of State business organizations. 

These “Confederate States” were created and hired to provide routine Government services when the State Assemblies are not in Session, much as you might hire a housekeeper while you go on vacation. 

And just as your housekeeper is not you and does not enjoy the same rights and material interests and powers as you, the States of States do not have the powers and prerogatives of States. 

Our current situation is exacerbated because the States of States we are now dealing with are foreign entities overseen by foreign powers— but the fact remains that a State always stands above a State of State. 

As an actual State Assembly Member you operate in an entirely different capacity and occupy a separate foreign jurisdiction set apart from any jurisdiction inhabited by a State of State business entity.  

Your position as a State Assembly Member once thoroughly understood is far more important and carries more rights and responsibilities than any position in State of State “Government”. 

The Employer stands over the employees.

The Landlord stands over the tenant.

The House Owner stands over the Housekeeper. 

It turns out that knowing the difference between a State and a State of State is absolutely crucial. 

It’s what keeps the world from being turned upside down, and keeps employees from bossing around their employers. 

If you have had enough of the confusion that ensues when States of States are mistaken for States—- go to: 

www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net

----------------------------

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

About the Constitutions - Again

 By Anna Von Reitz

Everything on this page needs to be read and repeated and thoroughly digested until it overcomes decades of indoctrination based on false assumptions and omitted information. 

When Webster published his Dictionary in 1824 he unwittingly preserved the meaning of the word “federal” as it was used during the Constitutional Process. 

“Federal” at that time was a well-known synonym for “Contract”. 

“Federal Government” equals “Contract Government”. 

The Constitutions — all three of them — are service contracts, and they were issued to three separate contractors in three separate years under three separate names, so there is no use in anyone trying to interpret this in any other way. 

All this may be Big News to you, especially as you have probably only seen two of these Constitutions in your life, and you probably never read these two closely enough to realize that they are two separate documents—- The Constitution of the United States and The Constitution of the United States of America.

I am pointing this out to you as a prelude to even more shocking information. 

The Constitutions are not about us. 

The Constitutions are about our Federal (Contract) Government Service Providers. 

The first contract issued in 1787 went to American Subcontractors operating what was called the Federal Republic.  

The second contract which was issued in 1789 went to British Territorial Subcontractors operating an unincorporated business calling itself “the” United States of America (British-American Trading Company). 

The third contract was issued to the Holy Roman Empire in 1790, which was hired to administer the postal system, customs houses, patent and trademark offices and similar services requiring global outreach. 

Your Forefathers explicitly knew that they, through their State Governments, were (1) setting up an American Subcontractor, the Federal Republic, to do and oversee most of the work of their government in international jurisdiction and (2) were hiring two completely foreign governments to perform services for them under contract and (3) were responsible, through their States of the Union for enforcing these constitutional contracts and paying for these services. 

There has been a lot of misguided talk about the Constitution of 1789, which chiefly concerns our British Subcontractors. Other than failure to enforce it, this contract has precious little to do with us, Americans. 

There has also been misguided talk about the Act of 1871 which was repealed in 1874.  The effect of the Act, even if it had succeeded, would have changed the form of the business providing services under the constitutional contract from an unincorporated business to an incorporated business.  

This presages the abuse of bankruptcy protection claimed by these business operators , but in-and-of itself, was not prohibited. Neither was the sale nor the merger nor the succession to contract of the Subcontractors prohibited. 

This is because the contracts themselves remained the same. The obligations remained the same.  

Indeed, the obligations are the same as they ever were, except as properly amended and ratified by the States of the Union —- which means that there have been no actual Amendments to any of the actual Constitutions since 1860. 

Why? 

Because the actual States of the Union were not brought back into Session after the Civil War, it has been impossible for us to ratify any Amendments. 

We slept and our people were mischaracterized and impersonated as foreigners in their own country, forced to pay foreign taxes, and subjected to foreign laws— by our Federal Subcontractors operated by foreign governments —- the Holy See, the Inner City of London—- aka, Government of Westminster, and the British Monarch. 

All three evaded their obligations and acted in Gross Breach of Trust and violation of their Commercial Service Contract.  

The findings are summarized as our Final Civil Judgment issued in April 2014 at the end of a seven year investigation and due process action by our still-operating unincorporated Federation of States and the remaining known People of each State at that time. 

The Judgment and Orders related to it were delivered to the other Principals acting as our Employees in this matter.  

The States of the Union were Summoned into Session, and here we are, with all fifty physically defined American States accounted for and populated by people holding the correct provenance and adopting their birthright political status. 

Our role as Americans is to enforce the Constitutions and exercise our rights guaranteed by them— while fully realizing that the Constitutions are not about us.  The Constitutions are contracts which our Federal Subcontractors (and their State of State franchises) must obey, while we stand apart under our separate foundation, The Declaration of Independence. 

You must realize that the Constitutions and all that arises as a result of the existence of these contracts is at best of tangential concern to us, Americans.  Why? Because the Constitutions aren’t about us. 

The Constitutions are about our Subcontractors— their rights and obligations, their limitations with respect to us, their operations, their definitions, etc., just as the Federal Code is not substantially about us, with about 92% of it never being addressed to us at all. 

Stop focusing on the guys mowing your lawn and start focusing on your own business— your State, your Government, your land and soil, your obligations as a Virginian, Idahoan, New Yorker or Marylander. 

Your States have been called into Session and are assembling right now.  

Go to: https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/ to learn more.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

I Stand Corrected

 By Anna Von Reitz

As my son, the hard core researcher into all historical rabbit holes has observed, the problem with history is all the omissions. And an omission left uncorrected often has the same effect as an outright lie, because it leads people to make false assumptions and adopt false beliefs. 

There is so much we simply don’t know, especially as regards world history, because the English language press and English textbooks omitted it— almost always with the unstated intention to make the Brits and their affiliates look better. 

I recently made the mistake of saying that Texas was the only State to have formed a separate stand-alone Republic prior to adopting Statehood, and noted that Hawaii was Kingdom —- which it was, however, what was omitted from my knowledge was the existence of a brief transitional Republic of Hawai’i . 

Essentially a junta of sugar planters eager to remove tariffs and trade restrictions blocking them from American mainland markets overthrew the Hawaiian Monarchy in 1893. 

U.S. Marines promptly landed on Oahu in support, and the British Territorial United States recognized the Republic of Hawai’i under the leadership of Sanford B. Dole — as in Dole Pineapple. 

This phony Republic run by American entrepreneurs who had moved to the islands to exploit their agricultural potential lasted five years, until Hawaii was “annexed” by “the” United States in July of 1898. 

The word “annexed” glosses over the hostile take over involved — but it was at that point a take over against the Lesser American Big Fish like Dole, who exercised a king-like authority over most of the Hawaiian work force, and the District Government Big Fish in Washington, D.C.  

For the people of Hawaii it meant one thing— foreign oligarchies operating under a racist British-American Imperialist scheme, taking over and running everything. 

The American home markets were thrown wide open to Hawaiian products and a vast amount of infrastructure began to appear — ports and roads and electrical grids and later airfields. 

So-called American Expansionism had gained its first offshore base in the Pacific—- but upon further consideration we have to ask was this “American” Expansionism or actually British Imperialism at work? 

The American Federal Republic fell in 1860 and still awaits Reconstruction. 

Who or what was at the political helm of this country in international affairs during the decades following the end of the Civil War?  The Scottish Commercial Corporation impersonating us as “The United States of America”——Incorporated. 

It wasn’t “American Expansionism” at all. It was British Expansionism by proxy that led to the annexation of Hawaii and which had engineered the Republic of Hawai’i five years previously, too. 

The people of Hawaii had precious little role in any of these developments so perhaps that is why the existence of the Republic of Hawai’i — unlike the Republic of Texas, drops through the cracks in the history books.  

In any event, I stand corrected. There was a Republic of Hawai’i run for a period of five years by foreign Robber Barons whose progeny remain ensconced in ill-gotten positions of political and economic power to this day. 

The main players in this charade of freedom and democracy were Americans only in terms of place of birth; politically, they were Tories, adopting British Territorial United States Citizenship, and operating their businesses in Hawaii as British Crown Corporations—- and all singing the same tune of British Colonialism and British Imperialism, howbeit with an American accent.

While the actual Americans were peacefully at home, our British Territorial Subcontractors were busy “representing” us and doing things we never authorized them to do—- and all at our expense. 

Many people have assumed that “American Imperialism” was actually American, but no, these actions in Hawaii were carried out “in our names” by Scottish Commercial Corporation subcontractors who were supposed to be providing us with good faith “essential government services” in our own country- not ramming around the Pacific impersonating us and using our credit to back their piracy. 

America didn’t annex Hawaii—- the Scottish Interlopers annexed Hawaii while impersonating us.  

And that is quite a different thing, requiring us and everyone else involved to look at the history of Hawaii and our relationship with the Hawaiian people with new eyes.  They have only recently, as of October 2020, been formally enrolled as an American State of the Union, owing to the fact that our American Government wasn’t in Session in 1959 when Hawaii entered a quasi-statehood as a British Territorial Confederate State doing business as the State of Hawaii. 

As such, Hawaii has never been administered as a true State of the Union and Hawaii’s people have never experienced the freedom and security they are owed.  They have instead labored under the foreign Raj-like British Territorial United States District Government and suffered its predation. 

These same British Interlopers are guilty of the mistreatment of the American Indians and the genocidal practices employed against them, the implementation of the “Reservation” system—- think: “Federal Reserve”—- and so much more. 

As usual, Great Britain is at the bottom of the dog pile—- and both here and elsewhere we see the same patterns of deceit, impersonation, omission, failure to disclose, credit theft, breach of trust and misrepresentation. 

It has been accomplished by similar means throughout the known world — implemented by bankers headquartered in the Inner City of London, and enforced by attorneys — also headquartered in the Inner City of London. 

The Fleet Street Banks and Temple Bar Attorneys have operated a vast criminal conspiracy against the rest of the world, with their members impersonating entire governments —- including ours, for decades at a time. 

Our own people have suffered as a result and we have unwittingly been used as mercenaries in support of criminal activities — pillaging and illegal confiscation at home, piracy abroad. 

Next, we will consider one of the largest, bloodiest and most expensive wars in “American” history— the Philippine-American War, which by an Act of Omission that staggers even my imagination, has been all-but completely forgotten. 

It lasted fifteen years. It cost hundreds of millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives.  

By comparison, the Spanish-American War that precipitated the Philippine-American War, was a ten week spat, not even a paper cut, by comparison. 

One must ask why a war that dwarfed Viet Nam by many orders of magnitude has been “forgotten” and omitted from the history books entirely or given only a footnote? 

Could it be that the Government of Westminster — the epicenter of all this criminality and it’s partner in crime, the Inner City of London, have something to hide? 

----------------------------

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Fourteenth Sunday After Pentecost

 Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's

The Church's Year

At the Introit of the Mass excite in your heart an ardent desire for heaven, with these words:

INTROIT Behold, O God, our protector, and look on the face of thy Christ:, for better is one day, in thy courts above thousands. How lovely are thy taber­nacles, O Lord of hosts! My soul longeth and fainteth for the courts of the Lord. (Ps. LXXXIII.) Glory etc.

COLLECT Keep, We beseech Thee, O Lord, Thy Church with Thy perpetual favor; and because without Thee the weakness of man is ready to fall, may it be withheld by Thy aid from all. things hurtful, and devoted to all things profitable to salvation. Thro'.

EPISTLE (Gal. V. 16-24.) Brethren, Walk in the spirit, and you shall not fulfil the lusts of the flesh: for the flesh lusteth against ,the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh: for these are contrary one to another: so that you do not the things that you would. But if you are led by the spirit, you are not under the law.. Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are, fornication, uncleanness, immodesty, luxury, idolatry, witchcrafts, enmities, contentions, emulations, wraths, quarrels, dissensions, sects, envies, murders, drunken­ness, revellings, and such like: of the which I foretell to you, as I have foretold to you, that they who do such things shall not obtain the kingdom of God. But the fruit of the Spirit is charity, joy, peace, patience, benignity, goodness, longanimity, mild­ness, faith, modesty, continency, chastity. Against such there is no law. And they that are Christ's have crucified their flesh with the vices and concupiscences.

What is it to walk in the spirit?

It is to obey the inspirations of the Holy Ghost always, and in all things. He who does this, says St. Paul, will not do the evil works of the flesh, which are here enumerated, but he will rather suppress and mortify all sensual desires, in this manner crucify his flesh together with its vices and lusts, and make himself worthy of the fruits of the Holy Ghost, which are also mentioned; he will belong to Christ, and secure for himself eternal happiness. On the contrary, he who lives according to the flesh, that is, gives way to the desires of the flesh, has no hope of salvation.

Is it not strange, that all Christians wish to belong to Christ and become heirs of His kingdom, but are unwilling to crucify the flesh and its lusts, though Christ says to all; If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. (Matt XVI. 24.)

ASPIRATION Intercede for me, O St. Paul, that God may give me grace to crucify my flesh with its lusts, that I may have part with thee in Christ:

GOSPEL (Matt. VI. 24-33.) At that time, Jesus said to his disciples: No man can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will sustain the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and Mammon. Therefore I say to you, be not solicitous for your life, what you shall eat, nor for your body, what you shall put on. Is not the life more than the meat, and the body more than the raiment? Behold the birds of the air; for they neither sow, nor do they reap, nor gather into barns, and your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are not you of much more value than they? And which of you, by taking thought, can add to his stature one cubit? And for raiment, why are you solicitous? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they labor not, neither do they spin; but I say to you, that not even Solomon in all his glory was arrayed as one of these. Now, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which is to-day, and to morrow is cast into the oven, how much more you, O ye of little faith? Be not solicitous, therefore, saying: What shall we eat, or what shall we drink, or wherewith shall we be clothed? For after all these things do the heathens seek. For your Father knoweth that .you have need of all these things. Seek ye therefore first the kingdom of God and his justice; and all these things shall be added unto you.

What is meant by serving God?

Doing the will of God, or performing faithfully and zealously all that God asks of us according to our age and condition, and for love of Him.

Who are the two masters whom we cannot serve alike?

God and Mammon or riches, whereby also, the other goods and pleasures of the world are understood. These we cannot serve at the same time, because they command things diametrically opposed to each other; for instance, God prohibits usury, theft, deceit, &c.; to which the desire for wealth impels us. God commands that we keep holy Sundays and holy days, and devote them to His service; the desire for riches tempts man to omit religious worship and to seek temporal gain; it disturbs him even in church, so that he is only present with his body, but absent in mind with his temporal goods and business.

To whom can riches be useful?

To those who, like the saints, perform works of mercy with them, and thus lay up treasures for themselves in heaven.

Why does Christ call our attention to the birds of the air and the lakes of the field?

To, excite in us confidence in the providence of God, which preserves even the birds and the flowers. Surely, if God feeds the young ravens which cry to Him; (Ps. CXLVI. 9.) if He nourishes the birds which neither sow, nor reap, nor gather into barns; if He vests the flowers of the field so beautifully, how much more will He care for man whom He has made to His own image and likeness, and adopted as His child, if he only acts as such, keeps His commandments, and always entertains a filial confidence in Him.

Should we, therefore, lay aside all care and never work?

This does not follow from what has been said. Christ condemns only the superfluous cares, which cause man to forget God and to neglect the salvation of his soul. Besides, God has Himself ordered (Gen. III. 17-19.) that man should obtain the fruits of the earth with much labor, that he should earn his bread by the sweat of his brow. St. Paul says: If any man will not work, neither let him eat. (II Thess. III. 10.)

What should preserve us from superfluous cares?

A firm and lively faith, that God can and will help us. That He can is evident, because He is almighty; that His will is certain, because He promises it in so many pas­sages of Holy Writ, and because He is infinitely faithful to all His promises. Christ encourages us to this lively confidence with these, words: All things whatsoever you ask when ye pray, believe that you shall receive and they shall come unto you. Mark XI. 24.) Therefore the apostle also commands us to throw all cares upon the Lord, who provides for us. (I Pet. V. 7.) And why should God not care for us, since He sent us His Son and with Him all; for which reason St. Augustine says: "How can you doubt that God will give you good things, since He vouchsafed to assume evil for you!"

PRAYER O Lord Jesus! give me a firm confidence in Thy Divine Providence, and daily increase it in me, that when in necessity I may confidently believe if I seek first the kingdom of God and His justice, the rest shall be added unto me.

CONSOLATION IN POVERTY
Be not solicitous for your life. (Matt. VI. 25.)

If you were born in poverty, or accidentally, or through your own fault have become poor, be consoled, because God has sent you this poverty for your own good; for good things and evil, life arid death, poverty and riches are, from God. (Ecclus. XI-14.). Therefore receive it from the hand of God without impatience or murmuring, as a means by which He wishes to keep you from forgetting Him, which would, perhaps, happen if He were to bless you with temporal prosperity. Riches are a source of destruction for many. If you have brought poverty upon yourself by a licentious and sinful life, receive it in a spirit of penance as a just and salutary chastisement, and thank God that He gives you an opportunity to do penance for your sins. But if you have become poor through no fault of your own, be consoled by the example of the saints, of whom St. Paul says: they bear the unjust taking away of their goods with joy, because they know that a better and an unchangeable treasure is in store for them in heaven. (Hebr, X. 34.) But you should particularly take courage from the example of Christ who, being rich, became poor for us, (II Cor. VIII. 9.) and had not a place whereon to lay His head. (Matt. VIII. 20.)

In your distress say with job: The Lord gave and the Lord bath taken away: as it pleased the Lord, so it is done: blessed be the name of the Lord. Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither. (Job. I. 21.) Fear not my son, says Tobias, we lead indeed a poor life, but we shall have many good things if we fear God, and depart from all sins, and do that which is good. (Tob. IV. 23.) To serve God and to be content with few things always brings rich reward, if not in this, at least in the next life. Therefore Christ promised the kingdom of heaven to the poor in spirit, that is, not only to the humble, busy also to the poor who imitate Christ in all patience and resignation. Follow, therefore, the poor Jesus, follow His poor mother, by imitating their example, and you will possess the kingdom of heaven.

INSTRUCTION CONCERNING USURY
You cannot serve God and Mammon. (Matt. VI. 24.)

Usury is to demand more than legal interest from our neighbor, to whom we have lent something, or who is otherwise indebted to us. Those are also commonly called usurers, who, in times of want, hoard up necessary food, such as grain, flour, &c., and only sell it at an exorbitant price; or who buy up all such articles to sell them to the needy for enormous prices. This is a grievous sin, and usurers are threatened with eternal death, for Christ ex­pressly prohibits lending with usury. (Luke VI. 34, 35.)

Usurers are the real leeches of the poor, whom they rob of their sweat and blood, and since they transgress the natural law, but still more the divine, which commands us to love our neighbor, and be merciful to the needy, they will surely not possess the kingdom of heaven. Would to God, the hard-hearted sinner might consider this, and take to heart the words of Christ: What doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul (Matt. XVI. 26.)

"Q" The Russian PsyOp Used by MI6 Agent "Wild Bill Donovan" in WWII

"Operation Trust" was a Bolshevik counterintelligence operation run from 1921 to 1926 aimed at neutralizing opposition by creating the false impression that a powerful group of military leaders had organized to stop the communists' takeover.   Here's an except on the "Trust" operation from pages 13-14 of Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn's book, "New Lies for Old"

Read the rest here:

https://justpaste.it/1nt3y

What is the “Supreme Law of this Land” Today?

 By Lex Greene

September 10, 2022

Speaking of the United States of America as the land in question, the long-standing legal authority of federal government rests entirely under the authorities granted to the federal government via the U.S. Constitution, further limited in nature and scope by the Bill of Rights.

In other words, no authority exists at all, beyond the authority granted the federal government in the U.S. Constitution. Yet, modern society has been conned by “legal experts” for more than a hundred years now. Most Americans errantly think that “Executive Orders” are laws, and so are “court opinions,” because that’s what they have been essentially brainwashed to believe.

Read the rest here:

What is the “Supreme Law of this Land” Today? – News With Views

EXCLUSIVE: Jan. 6 Prisoners and Families Expose Brutal Truth About Jail Lockdown

 https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-jan-6-prisoners-and-families-expose-brutal-truth-about-jail-lockdown_4714149.html

No Precedence for State Republics— One Exception

 By Anna Von Reitz

The exception is Texas. 

Texas has a unique history. 

Texas began as a regional province of Mexico — a very sparsely inhabited domain.  So the Mexican Government offered generous land grants to encourage people to move to Texas, 

640 acres per man, 320 each for his wife and every child, 80 acres per slave. 

All you had to do was behave yourself under Mexican Law and convert to Roman Catholicism and you were given all this land. For people who were already Roman Catholics it was a no-brainer, and no big obstacle for those without strong religious conviction, either. 

Soon would-be colonists from the United States began petitioning the Mexican Government to let them into Texas and the Mexicans agreed.  300 families affiliated with Mr. Austin, a lawyer and politician from Missouri,  crossed the border and settled in what is now Texas.  

They flourished.  More colonists from the Caribbean and Louisiana and foreign countries joined them.  Soon, the Mexican Government started treating Texas like a foreign country and imposing special tariffs and taxes on Texans.  Resentment festered. 

Fights broke out along the border and at seaports and soon, Texans were in open rebellion against Mexico. The rest of the story? The Texans won their independence from Mexico and formed their own independent country which they operated under a separate government modeled after the Roman Republic. 

It was several  years later that Texas became one of the Several States of the Union, so alone among the American States, Texas has a history of being a separate country with its own form of government— a Republic of Texas. 

There is no history of any other “State Republics” prior to Statehood, so all these people chasing around and claiming that they are restoring “state republics” are talking wind.  There were never any such state republics other than Texas.  Hawaii was a separate Kingdom, but not a republic — a monarchy. 

So.  Once again, Americans are proving that they know nothing about their own history and that they are prey to all sorts of incorrect assumptions as a result. 

Our state governments in the rest of the country begin and end as states having a “republican form of government” — which is to say, they were never Roman-style Republics, but were instead community-based governments operated by the common people themselves — not by a group of elite Senators. 

Texas was the only state to ever adopt a Roman-style Republic and therefore the only State that could, in theory, be “restored” to being a Republic, and functioning as a completely separate country with its own language, coinage, laws, etc. 

There are some Texans who cling to that idea and who aspire to rule over Texas as oligarchs—- which is the end result of Roman Republics —-but the fact is that they would lose the support of all the other States of the Union and be viewed as foreign insurrectionists and traitors. 

Most Texans are not insurrectionists and are not traitors to this country as a whole, nor do they cherish dreams of being “Senators” and lording it over other Texans. 

Most Texans just want what we all desire— to have the Hired Help back in order  and leaving them, the Texans, alone to live their lives without subjection to arbitrary foreign “laws” and coercion imposed by run amok public employees. 

Is that too much to ask? 

Without being branded as an insurrectionist? Or a Tin Hat?  Or a “Sovereign Citizen”? 

We believe that all the ignorant talk about “state republics” is being promoted by enemies of this country and that they and their agenda should be avoided — first, because the Roman Republic failed disastrously and oligarchy is always despotic, and second, if these yahoos don’t know enough history and law to decry the idea of “restoring” state republics that never existed, they certainly aren’t competent to restore the actual government we are owed.

----------------------------

See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Western Europe now facing “TOTAL FINANCIAL COLLAPSE” – experts and analysts urgently sound the alarm

 https://naturalnews.com/2022-09-08-western-europe-now-facing-total-financial-collapse-experts-sound-alarm.html

Western Europe is facing “total collapse” from catastrophic scarcity and price hikes surrounding food, fertilizer, energy and industry, warns David Dubyne, featured in today’s Situation Update podcast (below). Silver guru David Morgan, also featured in today’s podcast, adds that European banks are facing the possibility of systemic failures (and “bail-ins”) due to exposure to energy markets and the desire of Western European governments to keep printing money to try to address the devastating energy scarcity that is now irreversible.

American banks also have exposure to Europe’s economies, which means a failure of Western European banks, governments and currencies will spread like contagion to the United States and the dollar. With no solutions in sight — and no willingness among Europe’s politicians to even consider reversing their suicidal policies that led to this crisis — it seems that Western Europe is doomed to a simultaneous collapse of food, energy, industry, agriculture and currency.

Putin, it seems, won’t need to go to war with NATO after all. NATO countries are destroying themselves with astonishing speed.

See the rest here:

https://naturalnews.com/2022-09-08-western-europe-now-facing-total-financial-collapse-experts-sound-alarm.html

PHYSICIANS STATE: ABORTION NOT NECESSARY TO SAVE THE LIFE OF THE MOTHER!

 PROLIFE MONTANA❤️🕊

It is salve to my battle-worn soul when I read of colleagues worthy of the blessing it is to serve mankind as a physician.

 

Relevant to Referendum LR 131 that will be on the ballot 11/8/22 designed to protect babies who survive abortions…Please read the following written by physicians that abortion is not necessary to save the life of the mother. These articles refer to babies after 20 week viability because those older babies are the ones who have a chance to survive the attempt to destroy them..

 

Their arguments hold for the under 20 week babies as well…They call abortions “the guarantee of a dead baby…” which is to be distinguished from a procedure with the purpose to save the life of the mother. That’s why clearing out the womb after a miscarriage and treatment of tubal pregnancies were not considered murder or justifiable homicide even before the 1973 Roe V Wade decision.

 

So many notable quotes from these articles, including but not limited to:

 

“Abortion is not healthcare, much less an essential part of women’s health care…The fact that over 85 percent of OB-GYN in a representative national survey do not perform abortions on their patients…The vast majority of abortions are done by abortion providers who do not provide any other mind of medical care for the woman. Abortion treats no disease. Pregnancy is not a disease, and deliberately killing the unborn child by abortion is not healthcare.”

 

30,000 Doctors Say: “Abortion is Never Medically Necessary to Save a Mother’s Life” - LifeNews.com

 

It Is Never Necessary to Intentionally Kill a Fetal Human Being to Save a Woman’s Life: In Support of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act - Public Discourse (thepublicdiscourse.com)

 

VOTE YES on LR 131!!!

Annie Bukacek MD,

President, Montana ProLife Coalition❤️🕊❤️🕊