International Public Notice: Lincoln's "Nation"

 By Anna Von Reitz

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals

It was my Grandmother who first rolled her eyes toward the heavens and squinted when I brought home an invitation to a "Lincoln Day Dinner" --- a potluck, being hosted by the local Republican Political Party as a fundraiser for their candidates. 

She didn't like Lincoln.  No American who actually knew the man did, and everyone winced at his nickname, "Honest Abe", because it was a cynical comment on his true character, which was the exact opposite of his sanctimonious public persona. 

Today marks the 215th Birthday of this consummate Swindler, and to this day, even Wikipedia tells us that he was born at "Sinking Spring Farm, Kentucky, U.S." 

This is a veiled disclosure of what every American should know about Lincoln.  He was born as a Territorial Citizen -- a U.S. Citizen, an Englishman here under the auspices of the Residence Act. Not only that, in 1834, he was admitted as a full member of the Illinois Bar Association.  

Lincoln was completely, fully, admittedly, in your face a Brit, a devotee of her Royal Britannic Majesty, Queen Victoria of England --- and had been since birth. 

Abraham Lincoln came from an old English family whose Hallmarks still stand in Lincolnshire in England; they made no bones about where they stood during the Revolution ---they were avid Tories who fled to the hinterlands of Kentucky to escape persecution after the Revolutionary War. 

This is who Abraham Lincoln truly was, yet virtually nobody in America knew this about him; it was certainly never exposed in any of his electioneering efforts, nor discussed during his Presidency. It has been firmly suppressed ever afterward, but Lincoln himself made no big secret of it. 

He was, after all, a registered Bar Attorney, and he remained so all his life. Like Hiram (Ulysses S) Grant, his favorite General, Lincoln was a Queen's Man from Day One of his life. 

His position as a Bar Attorney also clearly discloses the nature of his "Presidential Office" as that of a President of a foreign British Territorial Corporation that was already running as "the United States of America, Incorporated" prior to the Civil War --- the same corporation that Lincoln bankrupted in 1863.  

We say this because Lincoln's position as a Bar Attorney disqualified him from serving as either the Federation President or the President of the American Federal Republic created in 1787. Bar Attorneys were prohibited from holding these offices by the Titles of Nobility Amendment added to the American Federal Constitution following the War of 1812. 

So the only "Presidency" Lincoln could hold was as President of the first version of the United States of America, Incorporated -- a British Territorial Corporation. 

Jefferson Davis clearly knew all of this, though he was under pain of death not to speak about it, when, after the surrender of Lee's Army, he said, "The truth will out." -- and it has, almost a hundred and sixty years later. 

That this Great Lie has survived for sixteen decades and six generations of Americans is a testament to the black depths to which the "Cloak of Secrecy" has been maintained by the Officers and General Staff of the occupying U.S. Army, the British Government, the British Crown, and the Popes ever since. 

Grant, like Lincoln, came from an old British family of Tories who fled to the wilds of Ohio after the Revolution, so the two men had much in common, including a long list of inherited family grievances. 

Lincoln's early poverty, like Grant's, was due to their -- in Lincoln's sardonic phrase -- "failure to inherit" the land and other property once owned by the families. 

They were both precluded from ever actually owning land in America by the changes wrought by the Revolution and had to be content with having their property consigned to a Public Trust held by the British King, who, as it turns out, claimed all right, benefit, and interest as they were considered his Wards, owing him everything they owned as war reparations for his expenses conducting the British side of The War of Independence. 

Curiously, neither Lincoln nor Grant appear to have understood that it was King George III who actually reduced their families to penury, not the victorious Colonists.  

The former Colonists were only acting under contract to collect King George's war debts from his Torey supporters, which made it look like the cruel impositions and losses visited on the Lincolns and the Grants were caused by the Americans -- when in fact, they were a result of the greed of King George III. 

Be that as it stands, Lincoln and Grant both grew up on stories of all the vicious things that happened during the eight long years of The War of Independence and all the terrible losses of property and social status their families suffered as a result. 

Lincoln watched his Mother die in terrible poverty, knowing that less than a hundred years before, she would have been a grand lady with vast swaths of land and cattle and every sort of wealth, if only the Americans hadn't won the war. 

Nobody knows why Hiram Grant changed his name to "Ulysses S" Grant during his tenure at West Point, but it is actually clear enough.  It renders his name using initials as: "U.S. Grant" -- an obvious reference to the loss of British Territorial United States land grants suffered after the Revolution.  The "S" doesn't actually stand for any name, like Solomon. It's just an "S" and "U.S. Grant" is a nom de guerre in a private war seeking vengeance against the victorious former American Colonies. 

To this day, an immense portrait of Lincoln stands in the Middle Innes of Court in the Inner City of London and he is one of the most famous members of the British Bar Association, as a result of his service in America -- serving to bring our country back under the British bootheel.  The entire Lincoln Memorial is a further testament to the gratitude of both the Queen and the British Crown.  

They didn't really win any "war", because the whole dreadful misery of the so-called Civil War was a Mercenary Conflict; but, it gained the Perpetrators what they really wanted -- a disguised foreign British Territorial occupation of our country by what appeared to be our own military forces. 

Like everything else that Abraham Lincoln accomplished via semantic deceits and constructive fraud, he had unlawfully converted our American Military Forces into Mercenary Forces, to be bought by the highest bidders, with no apparent changes to the insignias, training, or storefront mission.  

And now, all this fraud and force has come to roost for what it is: crime. 

Abraham Lincoln's most famous and high-sounding doggerel, The Gettysburg Address, turns out to be an insulting and ultimately deceptive screed when read from Lincoln's own standpoint as a British Torey. 

The sacrifices at Gettysburg were never about black plantation slavery in Lincoln's mind; they were about birthing a new "nation" -- a British Territorial nation, with franchises in every State of the Union. 

In view of the content of the last three International Public Notices regarding Identity Theft by Substitution, Parts 1,2 and 3, it should be apparent just how successful Lincoln and later, Grant, have been; the part that the BAR and Bar Associations and their members have played, the compromised position of the "U.S. Army", the British Scheme to impose British Territorial Regimes (equivalent to the Raj) on all the other countries they could subourne, and the ultimately criminal means they have used to secure their positions by means of fraud, human trafficking, impersonation, and "courts" that are not judicial courts, are abundantly clear. 

All of this has been promoted by pretense of war. 

The leaders of the Bar Associations were informed by Lincoln that they were at war. Similarly, the leaders of the Bar were informed in the same way, by Franklin Delano Roosevelt, that they were at war in the early 1930's. They were given to understand that this war required them to entrap, enslave, punish, and otherwise wreck havoc on us, and that their actions would be protected as exigencies of war. 

In actuality, there was never any war; there has been instead an endless stream of Mercenary Conflicts, something that Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara finally admitted in public during the "Vietnam Conflict".   

Thus, our nation and our public have been criminally and infamously undermined by a foreign nation and a foreign public under contract to provide us with "good faith service". 

We, ourselves, have been deliberately misidentified, falsely registered, impersonated, obligated and persecuted under these false and unconscionable pretenses under color of law by the same foreign governments and corporations that have perpetuated these practices and these gargantuan fraud schemes against the living people of every country and nation.  

The late Queen, Elizabeth II, served as the "Chair of the Estates" created by these criminal practices of constructive fraud and impersonation. 

Not only our country, but many others have suffered the predation of this consortium of corporate and mercenary interests. 

Mahatma Gandhi, a trained British Barrister, smelled the stench of this corruption in India, which led to the ouster of the British Raj, but somehow did not alert the rest of the world to the existence of this same criminal misadministration and misappropriation in other countries. 

What happened to us and to India has happened to many other countries, as transnational banks in league with these corporate interests have supported the constant fomenting of war for profit and political usurpation for profit throughout the world. 

To date our country, all former members of the British Commonwealth, all of the illegally occupied (still) countries of Western Europe, Japan, many countries in Africa, and several countries in the Mideast, have been affected and infected by these same criminal actors and their practices. 

This has led to illegal monopolization of information, currency supplies, natural resources, labor resources, and commodity markets worldwide. 

This same group of British Bunko Artists and their colluding monopoly of Central Banks designed to rig supplies of all important commodities including money, are even now sponsoring upwards of thirty (30) wars for profit, most infamously the genocide taking place in the Gaza Strip, the War in Ukraine, and the travesty taking place on our southern border, but let us not forget the twenty-plus "wars" and incursions in Africa, incipient wars in the Middle East, and more wars slated for Indonesia, the Philippines, and Australia, where they hope to wipe out up to 90% of the population preparatory to "giving" the Continent to China. 

We would like to know by what possible right or rationale any of these actions are being taken and supported by anyone with either a brain or a heart? 

These are criminal acts undertaken by criminals misdirecting mercenary forces populated by men and women who don't even know that they were hired as mercenaries. 

We have requested a validated accounting of all assets on deposit with the member central banks of the Bank for International Settlements -- all accounts belonging to this country and our people must eventually be accounted for, but for starters, we are claiming and demanding the survivorship interest in all accounts owed to The United States of America and all the Code F.L.A.T. accounts owed to one of our Nationals, Julius Demitrius Shiva, also known as Julius Demitrious Shiva.

These assets and accounts have been misrepresented as belonging to the phony constructive "Estates" and "ESTATES" created in our names as described in our three prior International Public Notices: Identity Theft Via Substitution, Parts 1, 2 and 3 -- purportedly in the absence of unknown heirs or missing parties and as "abandoned assets" left on deposit -- and these False Claims have been asserted by the same characters who have brought all the rest of the misery and calamity on this planet to fruition. 

This commandeering of our private survivorship interest in the Global Collateral Accounts and the accounts belonging to this country's actual Government, is one of the primary ways that the colluding banks, corporate interests, "warring" Bar Associations, and misdirected military efforts, have been funded. 

These corporate crime syndicates have been unlawfully, illegally, and immorally locking down our assets and misusing them under all these False Pretenses, illegally securitizing our living flesh and labor assets via semantic pretenses, and generating huge amounts of credit for themselves by pretending that our assets are part of fraudulently constructed and unclaimed Public Trust Accounts and similar fraudulent private trust accounts promoted by the "secular side" of the Roman Catholic Church.  

The Bank for International Settlements and its member banks, have all knowingly or unknowingly, participated in these fraud schemes against us, and are now being called upon to come clean. 

The Americans in the various "United States" Military Forces are being called to honor their Oaths to protect and defend us against "all enemies, foreign and domestic". 

The world's International Courts and Tribunals, the members of the International and National Bar Associations, the members of the National Governments that remain, all the living people of this planet are being called to take action to bring an end to this insidious evil in our midst. 

Members of the Bar Associations -- you have been lied to, used, and betrayed. Justice has been betrayed.  These corporatists have made a mockery of your calling and used you to inflict crimes of infinite variety on innocent people who never owed the British King or the Pope a dime.  

Members of the world's Police Forces -- these criminals have likewise made fools out of you and risked your lives in the cause of injustice and criminality.  

People of the world, arise and awaken, you have been the victims of murderers and thieves posing as your lawful governments.  

Just as Gandhi observed, so we observe, that the Raj organizations infesting our nations really have no right or cause to be present here.  Just as in India, the British Bunko Artists are here by virtue of a residency agreement (Residence Act) allowing them to be here to provide specific services, and they have grossly imposed upon our hospitality. 

Issued by:

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

February 12th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 4600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Identity Theft Via Substitution (Part 3)

 By Anna Von Reitz

Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals

It may seem like there couldn't possibly be more to this stinking onion, but there is, and if possible, it's even worse and more demoralizing, because it involves a religious institution famous for preserving and preaching the Gospel: the Roman Catholic Church. 

What we have described thus far is the creation of a Public Trust Interest in private property by a foreign government -- an Ownership Interest which is used to pillage, plunder, coerce, and defraud the actual owner under color of law. 

That is bad enough.  

What we have to deal with next in reference to the Roman Catholic Church is the creation of a Private Trust Interest in private American property by a foreign government known as Vatican City. 

In some ways, it is much the same spiel. 

The British Territorial United States Government claims a public interest in "abandoned" American Estate property using the mechanism of undisclosed and unconscionable registration of American babies as chattel assets. 

The Vatican City operatives claim a private trust interest in the estates of purportedly dead American babies that they consistently describe as stillborn fraternal twins.

It turns out that the "stillborn fraternal twin" amounts to the placenta and Afterbirth material, and that this whole "tradition" goes back to the time of St. Thomas Aquinas, when people were superstitious and didn't know or understand what all this extra material was. 

This "twin" described by Pope Boniface VIII as a "human creature" always arrived with a baby.  It started out with a heartbeat and shortly after delivery, it died.  So they attached whatever name the parents gave to this "baby" and gave it a Baptism while the heartbeat was still present (if possible) and then almost immediately after, performed Last Rites. 

And they set up an infant decedent estate in the name of the "lost" fraternal twin, which also happened to be the name of the surviving twin brother.

Sound familiar?  

The government charlatans just adapted their version of the Roman Catholic playbook, which the church had been using for several hundred years. 

This accounts for the incredible alacrity with which the placenta and Afterbirth material was always removed and shuttled away from the Mother in Catholic hospitals, such that most women never even saw the placenta -- at least that's how it started out. 

Now, we know what a placenta is and what the Afterbirth materials are, so there is really no excuse to carry this tradition on; the most recent testimony and evidence suggests that this stopped being the practice in the 1970's in this country.  

Instead, even worse things happened. They seized upon the DNA of the "stillborn fraternal twin" that has the same name as the surviving brother or sister,  started selling the placenta, umbilical cord, and other Afterbirth material for scientific research, stem cell culture, food "additives", and even dog food. 

Remember the Municipal CORPORATIONS named after the U.S. Citizens ---which were named after the American babies?  The slaves?  

All those slaves represented as Municipal CORPORATIONS were bonded at "birth" by the Roman Pontiff, who issued a gold-backed bond on the estimated lifetime value of the "child's" labor which was securitized as an asset backing these performance bonds. 

These CORPORATIONS representing slaves were created by the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and then permanently domiciled in Puerto Rico, where the British Commonwealth of Puerto Rico still provided access to the Spanish Law of the Inquisition. 

The Income Tax started out in the early 1100's as a special collection offering of the Roman Catholic Church called "Peter's Pence".  It was used to pay the cost of the Crusades. It was collected once a year on April 15th by members of the Dominican Order --- the Inquisition, under the Spanish Law of the Inquisition. 

That's why they domiciled all these CORPORATIONS named after U.S. Citizens who were named after American babies, in Puerto Rico, so they could continue to access the Spanish Law of the Inquisition. 

This is the mechanism underlying the Federal Income Tax, which started in this country as a kickback tax imposed on the slaves for the privilege of Federal Employment. 

The Roman Pontiff wanted his fair share of the value of his slave's labor, and the British Territorial Government running Puerto Rico wanted it's share, so to collect this they had two Federal Agencies, the IRS and the Internal Revenue Service, both, deliberately misaddressing the American victims of this identity theft, impersonation, and substitution fraud scheme. 

To this day, Internal Revenue Service billing statements are sent to clueless Americans via the Royal Mail Service, and IRS billing statements are sent via the USPS -- and all of this is deliberately misaddressed to us as U.S. Citizens or US CITIZENS known to be citizens of the United States under the Diversity of Citizenship Clause -- who just happen to have the same -- or what appears to be the same--  name as we do. 

These schemes run in tandem. 

If you don't answer the correspondence from the IRS, they'll send you a bill from the Internal Revenue Service, and once again, all of this is based on the fraudulent securitization of an asset -- your labor -- which belongs to you, but which has been secretly "attributed" as belonging to the estate of your "dead" brother or sister.  

No matter which agency, IRS or Internal Revenue Service, makes the score, the split is the same: 60% to the Vatican, 40% to the British Monarch. 

It's the same thing with the Birth Certificate Fraud and the Baptismal Certificate Fraud (which claims to own, buy, and sell your soul as an asset pledged to the Roman Catholic Church) -- a 60:40 split. 

These "clearinghouse certificates" are issued each time another registration and assignment of ownership interest and change of jurisdiction occurs, and they are given to your parents like a "coat check" to legalize what the Vermin have done. 

As Americans are never given any disclosure about any of this, they think the "Birth Certificate" is just a harmless public record of the event of a baby being born.  They don't know that it represents a purloined interest in their assets and the assumption of debts related to foreign citizenship obligations and pledges that were made "in their names" by Third Parties or contracts owed by foreign Legal Fiction Entities that have been named after them for purposes of impersonation. 

All these are "private contracts" with Legal Fiction Entities named after you, Legal Fictions which are used to impersonate you without your knowledge or consent. 

You never knew about the U.S. Citizen named after you, because that was a totally unconscionable contract, so, you never knew about "his" ESTATE contracts with the Roman Pontiff, either. 

The whole scheme was designed as a black box within a black box, with deliberate misidentification and impersonation at the heart of it. 

At every step, Joe Average American has been nailed down to suffer and slave for the obligations of all these foreign "citizens" named after him, all Legal Fictions that don't even exist. 

It's a completely evil and vacuous system built of lies, paper, and hot air, yet this "System" has continued to exist behind the scenes ever since the First Crusades, when Roman Catholics lost their minds and actually believed that "Killing for Jesus" made sense. 

So expert and pernicious are these identity thieves and "human" traffickers, so slickly efficient are their bill collectors, they put on a show in courtrooms to make it look like all this is "official" and yet, they are operating under color of law and conditions of deceit and the characters they address aren't real.  

It is all designed purely and simply to defraud the living people, to purloin or outright steal their assets and their credit for the benefit and use of Third Parties.  These are, whether we like it or not, the practices of organized crime syndicates. 

And once again, the BAR Attorneys are smack dab in the center of it, playing the games and committing the personage necessary to defraud and steal the assets and the credit belonging to the living people. 

Now that this has become common knowledge, the Corporate Vermin responsible have tried one more desperate, vile, criminal gambit. 

First, they "redefined" us as British Territorial U.S. Citizens, next they "redefined" the U.S. Citizens as Roman Catholic-owned Municipal CORPORATIONS, and now, they have tried to redefine everyone who got a Covid 19 injection as Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) owned by DARPA under patent, and licensed to Microsoft, Inc. 

We don't need to tell you what we think, because we already published and issued the first new Public Law in America in over a hundred years. Our States, the actual unincorporated and sovereign States of the Union, outlawed all such claims and patents, by Roll Call Vote of our State Assemblies. 

We, individually and collectively, are owed all right, title, and interest in our names and our natural estates, all vested and physical interest in our assets, and we hold the unique survivorship interest in our named estates and country, our Union States and our States of the Union, our public and private property and assets of all kinds, including but not limited to our credit.  

Our courts hold superior concurrent General Jurisdiction over all Americans and all American assets, so it's time for our foreign public employees to wake up and drop the false patent claims, the false registrations and all the rest of it. 

We are not the Enemy; we are their employers. We are the source of their job security, their pensions, their homes and everything they own.  We are the source of the credit they use in place of money. We are and we own the assets that they depend upon. 

These are circumstances with which we must contend and the claims we must advance in every jurisdiction and at every level, until we regain recoupment and restitution for everyone who has been harmed by these fraud schemes and usurpations by foreign corporations masquerading as our government and acting in their private interest under color of law. 

We, the living people,  are the actual owners of the gold, silver, land, cash, and corporate assets held in the Global Collateral Accounts; we are also the source and owners of the labor asset resources, patents, trademarks, copyrights, performances and intellectual assets. 

We are done with evil.  We are done with being bullied and misrepresented by our public employees. And we are definitely done with the disservice of the Maritime Commercial Banks -- especially when we own the superior claim on everything they pretend to own. 

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

February 12th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 4600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Identity Theft Via Substitution (Part 2)

 By Anna Von Reitz

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents

You will recall this phrase from the prior International Public Notice: Identity Theft Via Substitution: 

"Their Mother signed an undisclosed contract at the hospital saying that they were "United States citizens" an act by which she unknowingly became an "Informant" -- as in an Informant reporting a crime."

How could it be a crime to be a United States citizen?  And why would a biological Mother be listed as an "Informant" on records related to her newborn? 

This goes back to the misrepresented and so-called American Civil War and to a giant British fraud scheme taking place in the years immediately after the surrender of Lee's Army.  

In Scotland in 1868, a new commercial corporation calling itself "The United States of America" -- was formed. This just happens to be the exact name and style of name used by our unincorporated Federation of States -- The United States of America.  

They simply failed to disclose the difference by omitting the word "Incorporated", so everyone mistook them for our Federation of States. 

The complicit Bank Accomplices winked and gave them access to our credit.  They impersonated us like any credit card hacker does today, but nobody knew what they were doing in 1868. 

Next, they published, also in 1868, a document that on the face of it, said, "The Constitution of the United States of America", which appeared to be identical to the British Territorial Constitution issued in 1789 under the same name.  Everyone was confused and wondering why this was being done out of the blue. 

Everyone already had copies of The Constitution of the United States of America, but they were fronting yet another very similarly named corporation, this time a Delaware Corporation. 

Once again, the word "Incorporated" was omitted, thus failing full disclosure of what they were publishing ----and deliberately confusing it with the actual 1789 Constitution. 

What was actually happening was an attempt to legally enclose the actual Constitution and replace it with a different kind of Constitution entirely. They were publishing the disguised Articles of Corporation --the charter of a Delaware Corporation calling itself the United States of America (Incorporated).  

This is another substitution fraud scheme and unlawful conversion, but it was cleverly done.  This explains why none of the Amendments to this "Constitution" were ever ratified by our States of the Union --- they were rendered as By-Law Amendments of a Corporation and required only the approval of their Board of Directors, the erstwhile members of the British Territorial U.S. Congress. 

The most infamous By-Law Amendment to this document was the so-called Fourteenth Amendment. 

The Thirteenth Amendment of this document loudly and simply abolished slavery.  The Fourteenth Amendment reinstated slavery by declaring that criminals are slaves, and that "citizens of the United States" are criminals, therefore, slaves. 

Of course, they obfuscated this maneuver behind a fusillade of Legalese that would make the Devil faint, but that is, nonetheless, what they did for the purposes of their for-profit corporation and its administration.  

They were setting themselves up to collect "war reparations" from Southerners and from Federal Civil Service workers who sided with the South -- even though there was no actual war and they were not owed war reparations as a result.  

They had already set up ten "special" Military District Courts in the eleven Southern States in May of 1865; these were so-called Special Admiralty Courts, that is, Admiralty on Land, operated by civilians acting as Hired Jurists appointed by a General of at least Brigadier rank.  

These were and still are Military District Courts called "United States District Courts" and not Judicial District Courts at all.  Remember that all Judicial Districts were dissolved by the 34th United States Congress (1855-57) so that any pretense that these were Judicial Districts or Judicial Courts ten years later, was removed.  

These are the infamous "Carpetbagger Courts" -- called that because so many of the Hired Jurists coming down from the North used colorful bags made out of carpet material as luggage. Wagon loads full of these predators descended on the Southern States within days of Lee's capitulation. 

Now, with the "Fourteenth Amendment"  they had defined their new slaves and criminals as "citizens of the United States" -- a reference to the employees of the Papist Municipal United States Government that provided Postal Services and a few other Federal Civil Service functions prior to the "war", and which had sided with the Southern Confederacy.  

They also laid claim on all the former plantation slaves and cast them into this dehumanized criminal slave status by "conferring" this citizenship on them without their knowledge or consent.   

Private slave ownership might be abolished, but public slave ownership was just getting started. 

The Scottish Corporation operating as The United States of America (Incorporated) went bankrupt in 1906 and the Delaware version of the United States of America (Incorporated) followed suit in 1930, taking its fraudulent Constitution and its Fourteenth Amendment with it, but the corrupt elements of the court system and the U.S. Congress are still attempting to use this as a "cause of action" and an excuse to criminalize anyone unfortunate enough to be classed as a "citizen of the United States".  

American Mothers seeing the words "the United States" immediately assume that they refer to the Union States holding the soil jurisdiction of this country; they are never told that these same words have any other meaning. They are also never taught the meaning of "citizenship" so they innocently agree that their baby is a "citizen of the United States".  

They are thus misrepresented, not as the actual Mother of the baby, but as an Informant, giving testimony that their own baby is a criminal and a slave under the definitions of the long-defunct Fourteenth Amendment. 

This further denigration of political and social status from that of a U.S. Citizen serving as a "Human" to that of a citizen of the United States existing as a slave with only "Civil Rights" (that turn out to be privileges instead) takes place right after the initial registration with a second registration carried out by the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE in Washington, DC under the Municipal Law of the independent international city-state of WASHINGTON, DC -- which is just another British Crown corporation squatting in the District of Columbia. 

So there you have the origin of the present day  "Federal Dual Citizenship" --- and all of it being fraudulently imposed on Americans who owe the British Crown, the British Monarch, and the Pope, a great deal less than nothing at all--- about Minus $35 Trillion and counting. 

There was once another kind of Federal Dual Citizenship that can be glimpsed in the earliest versions of our Immigration and Naturalization Acts-- a status that allowed an American to work as a Federal Government employee of the American Federal Republic (operating as "the united States of America") without the loss of their Constitutional Guarantees. 

I mention this because there is an attempt by the British Territorial U.S. Citizens to substitute a British Territorial rendition of a Federal Republic for the American version -- The Federal Republic, and there may be attempts to redefine and latch onto our old definition of Federal Dual Citizen, too.  

They are quite desperate to escape and excuse and deny what they have done, and still not willing to just throw it down and plead for amnesty from the actual American Government, despite having a plausible excuse. 

Lincoln unlawfully converted our American Military Forces into Mercenary Forces; he and his Successors have been baffling the Generals with Legalese and excuses ever since, though the ugly truth of the matter can hardly have escaped a good many of them, and certainly didn't escape Smedley Butler who openly said, "War is a racket." -- in the criminal sense.  

Please note that the abject criminals most responsible, the members of the British Territorial U.S. Congress, some of whom also duplicitously serve as members of the US CONGRESS, are still trying to use the Fourteenth Amendment of a long-defunct Corporation Charter to prosecute DONALD J. TRUMP, a foreign Municipal Corporation franchise owned and operated by the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION as a SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLE --- aka, the body of a slave. 

Any time that you, as a Bar Attorney, have ever represented a PLAINTIFF or DEFENDANT in a COURT, you have been operating in a MUNICIPAL DISTRICT COURT, or STATE-OF-STATE FRANCHISE COURT representing a slave being transported as cargo in Maritime Commerce. 

All this Federal Code, as in Secret Code, has to be translated and can't be understood by average people. That is why Amendment XI of the actual Federal Constitution excuses Americans from having to understand it and keep up with its ever-changing definitions.  

We are held immune and exempt from all of this, as long as we are Americans. To deprive us of these protections of our natural political identity,  and to evade their own service obligations owed to us, these treasonous foreign corporations have contrived this entire scheme. 

We've just recently had a good example of their misuse of the ability to create legal terms and redefine common words, when they arbitrarily changed the "legal definition" of the word "vaccine" to include mRNA therapies, and then found out that the injections foisted off onto unsuspecting Americans as vaccines weren't mRNA therapies, either.  

They were nanoscale gene-editing devices known by Pfizer, Inc. to cause more than 300 harmful diseases and disorders.  

Looks like they just ran out of excuses for all of this; for once, the Liars couldn't change the meaning of common words fast enough.  

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

February 11th 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 4600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

International Public Notice: Identity Theft Via Substitution

 By Anna Von Reitz

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents

We are born and instantly, we are "given" a name, a nationality, a religion, a race, a color, a kind, a caste, a socio-political status, a blood type, a genome-type, a family tree, a financial rating, a bond, a certificate for what we are worth as a bonded commodity....  We don't choose any of this. 

Our identity is thus arbitrarily defined and imposed on us by the world that men have created. The world "system" immediately clamps down on us and starts defining and limiting us and shaping us for its purposes and convenience, not ours. 

And we are babies. We don't know that this is happening or why.  We are Innocents; we accept these "gifts" along with Mother's milk. 

Most people are deluded from the outset and stay deluded their entire lives.  Someone calls them by a name, so they identify themselves with that name, and take it as Gospel that that is who they are and that they are what their name means. 

They become the definition of their name, instead of their name becoming an instrumentality for their use. 

A name is actually a gifted bit of material property interest, akin to a bookcase or a bicycle; if your parents are wise, they record it in public, together with a property description, prior to the worldly government getting a chance to register it and copyright it for their use. 

"A son, James Allen, born to Richard and Anna Lee of Clivedyf Circle, Edinburgh, Scotland, on the twenty-third of March 1968" is a property description recorded and published in the local newspaper as a "Birth Announcement".  

It establishes who, what, when, where, and precisely which "James Allen Lee" we are talking about and also who this "James Allen Lee" belongs to, therefore, who is responsible for his upkeep, and also which nation he belongs to, and what law applies to him. 

He's a Scotsman, born in Scotland, under Scottish Law.  He's a son, not a bastard, not an orphan, and this is who his parents are.  This is where they live.   

Without this crucial record (and admission by the parents) we are left with nothing but the following "public registration process" that is created a few days or weeks after the baby is actually born. 

The hospitals create a "uniform registration" for all babies born in their care or under the care of any licensed doctor or midwife or ambulance or police service.  This registration is an ownership claim on the baby and his earthly estate by a government -- not necessarily his own government. 

That registration makes additional presumptions, that in the absence of other claims and records, allows the government to presume citizenship obligations on the baby. 

In this country, all babies with a birth registration are denigrated to the status of being "abandoned" by their parents, considered wards of the State, British Subjects, and British Territorial U.S. Citizens.  

They are no longer recognized as sons and daughters of men and women who are freeborn Americans, but occupy a lesser status as boys and girls derived from males and females -- the status of "humans" and "persons" and "animals" and "indentured servants", owed Human Rights, but not the Natural and Unalienable Rights they are otherwise heir to.  They are also assigned Titles under Admiralty Law: Miss or Master; later, they will be called by other British Admiralty Titles: Mister (a Midshipman), Missus, (a Midshipman's wife), Doctor (a ship's doctor) and so on.  

These newly created-by-contract (registrations are contracts waiving ownership rights) U.S. Citizens are allowed to be in this country under the provisions of the Residence Act. They stand under The Constitution of the United States of America, but are not heirs or parties to it, so they enjoy none of its protections or guarantees -- those are for Americans, and though they don't know it and their parents don't know it, they are no longer considered Americans. 

They are considered wards of the British Monarch and dependents/employees of the British Crown Corporation doing business as "the United States of America, Incorporated". 

Their Mother signed an undisclosed contract at the hospital saying that they were "United States citizens" an act by which she unknowingly became an "Informant" -- as in an Informant reporting a crime.   By doing so, she waived her ownership interest in her own baby, waived his or her ownership interest in their American estate, accepted the obligations of being a British Territorial U.S. Citizen "for" the baby, and accepted the denigrated status of a "human" and a "Person" owed only Human Rights "for" the baby, too.  

Of course, the Mother doesn't understand any of this.  She isn't told which "United States" or which "United States of America" these Pikers are talking about on these forms. She has no idea that she is signing away her baby and his birthright and changing his political status to that of a British Territorial U.S. Citizen. She has no concept of any of this and isn't told a word; the human trafficking thieves engaged in this criminal activity disclose nothing to her.  

So the parent knows nothing for lack of disclosure, and of course, the baby knows nothing, because its too young to be aware that anything is happening. 

This results in a totally unconscionable contract that irreparably harms the American baby and opens up his estate to be pillaged as an "abandoned" Public Interest Estate (Public Charitable Trust) operated under his own Given Name.  

The "infant decedent estate" thus created comes under the authority of the British Admiralty and the British Merchant Marine Service (Maritime Commerce) and as the infant American "died" intestate, this creates a Public Trust holding all his assets "for" him, until he "returns" and claims those assets. 

In the meantime, British BAR Attorneys will act as Executors de Son Tort and administer his "waived" American estate as they see fit --- for the benefit of their King, of course, and taking a nice commission cut for themselves for this "public service".  

Every time that you have acted as a BAR Attorney in any of the various Courts and have addressed a Plaintiff or Defendant using any Upper and Lower Case Name, you have been in an Admiralty Court, administering the Estate of an American who was "registered" as a dependent or employee of the British Crown, an American who was "lost at sea" and "presumed dead" -- even though he or she was most likely standing right there in front of you, the victim of the most egregious and self-interested fraud imaginable. 

This is a capital crime of Unlawful and Unconscionable Conversion of natural political status prohibited by both the Geneva and Hague Conventions; it involves human trafficking, inland piracy, impersonation, fraud, and conspiracy to defraud using undisclosed and unconscionable contracts.  It's one of the biggest peonage and enslavement rackets in history, and as a licensed BAR Attorney, you are dead center in the middle of it. 

Ouch. 

As you can see, this swindle involves creating a non-existent Public Interest in a private estate for a foreign government.  

The victim is first registered and impersonated as a foreign Person and denigrated to the political status of an indentured servant to secure this claim. 

The foreign Legal Fiction Person  uses the same exactly styled Given Name as the American victim of this scheme, so that verbally and visually, they appear to be one-and-the-same.  

Emily Wright Bellevue, the Given Name of a living woman, appears to be exactly the same as Emily Wright Bellevue (Estate). They simply don't disclose (again) by saying or writing "Estate" after the name, and thus fail to identify the Plaintiff or the Defendant or the proper subject matter, much less the venue in any of these court cases.  

They are all completely fraudulent, null and void, and criminal under International and Public Law. 

This is just half of it.  The British half.  There's more fraud and malfeasance involving BAR Attorneys to come.  

You may be shaking your head and wondering how such a thing could be, but it has been going on "in the back room" for the past 300 years. 

You may also wonder what possible excuse there could be for this behavior on the part of your esteemed colleagues.  They've been told that they are at "war" and that this justifies all this evil done to innocent-appearing "enemies". 

That claim, that they are at "war", turns out to be just another crock of crap poured on top of an already vast manure pile. 

It derives from the idea that the so-called American Civil War was an actual war.  It wasn't and it isn't.  It was an undeclared Mercenary Conflict -- illegal and unlawful by definition.  

No Congress ever declared The American Civil War, much less the American Federation Congress responsible for taking such action.  

This "conflict" is owed no dignification as a war, and no cover is provided by the Pretense of War for Municipal or Commercial Corporations engaged in 

it; rather, they are engaged in acts of murder, armed robbery, inland piracy, and genocide. 

The Corporations responsible have strong-armed, deceived, and corrupted the courts into going along with this scheme, and now, they are all set to provoke civil unrest at our Southern Border and try to "get something going" again, with tons more innocent people in the middle and at risk. 

The actual battlefield is in our mind. It involves our ability to discern what is true and what is right, and tests our determination to put an end to this filthy criminality once and for all time. 

But standby.  There's more absurdly criminal malfeasance to report on.  

Issued by: 

Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

February 11th  2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 4600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Quinquagesima Sunday

 Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's

The Church's Year

The Introit of this day's Mass is the sigh of an afflicted soul confiding in God:

INTROIT Be thou unto me a God, a protector, and a place of refuge, to save me: for thou art my strength and my refuge: and for thy name's sake thou wilt be my leader, and wilt nourish me. (Fs. XXX. 3. 4.) In thee , O Lord, I have hoped, let me never be confounded: deliver me in thy justice, and set me free. (Ps. XXX. 2.)

COLLECT O Lord, we beseech Thee, graciously hear our prayers, and unloosing the bonds of our sins, guard us from all adversity. Through our Lord, etc.

EPISTLE (I. Cor. XIII. 1-13.) Brethren, if I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal. And if I should have prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I should have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing. And if I should distribute all my goods to feed the poor, and if I should deliver my body to be burned, and have not charity, it profiteth me nothing. Charity is patient, is kind: charity envieth not; dealeth not perversely; is not puffed up; is not ambitious; seeketh not her own; is not provoked to anger; thinketh no evil; rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth; beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things. Charity never falleth away: whether prophecies shall be made void, or tongues shall cease, or knowledge shall be destroyed. For we know in part, and we prophesy in part: but when that which is perfect is come, that which is in part shall be done away. When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away the things of a child. We see now through a glass in a dark manner; but then face to face. Now I know in part; but then I shall know even as I am known. And now there remain faith, hope, charity, these three: but the greatest of these is charity.

EXPLANATION In this epistle St. Paul speaks of the necessity, the excellence and the nature of true charity. He says that all natural and supernatural gifts, all good works, even martyrdom, cannot save us if we have not charity; because love alone can render our works pleasing to God. Without charity, therefore, though ever so many prayers be recited, fasts observed , and good deeds performed, nothing will be acceptable to God, or merit eternal life. Strive then, O Christian soul, to lead a pious life in love, and to remain always in the state of grace.

Can faith alone, as the so-called Reformers assert, render man just and save him?

Faith alone, however strong, though it could move mountains, without love, that is, without good works performed for love of God and our neighbor, can never justify or save us. For, when St. Paul says, that man is justified by faith without works, (Rom. III. 28.; XI: 6.; Eph. II. 8. 9.) he means to refer to those works which were performed by command of the law of Moses, and which, as they were external and without true charity, were of no avail; he did not refer to those works which are performed in a state of grace with a lively, love-inspired faith. Therefore the same Apostle writes to the Galatians: (Gal. V. 6.) Faith only availeth which worketh by charity; to Titus: (Tit. III. 8.) It is a faithful saying: and these things I will have thee affirm constantly: that they who believe in God, may be careful to excel in good works. These things are good and profitable unto men; and he exhorts the Colossians (Colos. I. 10.) to be fruitful in every good work. St. James confirms the same by saying: (James II. 17-24.) So faith if it have not works, is dead in itself; by works man is justified and not by faith only. That this is the true doctrine of Christ is evident from His own words, when He says: "Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, shall be cut down and shall be cast into the fire." (Matt. VII. 19.) At the day of judgment Christ will demand good works from all men, (Matt. XXV. 35.) and will not judge them only according to their faith, but by their good works, which true faith must always produce. (Apoc. XX. 12.) Would Christ and His apostles demand good works, if faith alone be sufficient? "The devil's also believe and tremble," (James II. 19.) they believe, but they are not saved, and their faith but increases their torments. Therefore, the assertion that faith without good works is sufficient for justification and salvation, is plainly against the doctrine of Christ and His Church, and must of necessity lead man to vice and misery, as shown by the history of the unhappy separation of the sixteenth century

Are good works available which are performed in the state of mortal sin ?

Good works performed while in a state of mortal sin avail nothing in regard to eternal life, writes St. Lawrence Justinian, but aid in moderating the punishment imposed for disobedience and the transgression of God's commandments. They bring temporal goods, such as honor, long life, health, earthly happiness, etc.; they prevent us from falling deeper into sin, and prepare the heart for the reception of grace; so the pious Person writes: "Do as much good as you can, even though in the state of mortal sin, that God may give light to your heart."

ASPIRATION O God of love, pour the spirit of true charity into my heart that, according to the spirit of St. Paul, I may endeavor to be always in a state of grace; that all my works may be pleasing to Thee, and meritorious for me.

GOSPEL (Luke XVIII. 31-43.) At that time, Jesus took unto him the twelve, and said to them Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things shall be accomplished which were written by the prophets concerning the Son of Man. For he shall be delivered to the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and scourged, and spit upon; and after they have scourged him, they will put him to death; and the third day he shall rise again. And they understood none of these things, and this word was hid from them, and they understood not the things that were said. Now it came to pass, when he drew nigh to Jericho, that a certain blind man sat by the way-side, begging. And when he heard the multitude passing by, he asked what this meant. And they told him that Jesus of Nazareth was passing by. And he cried out, saying: Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me. And they that went before rebuked him, that he should hold his peace. But he cried out much more: Son of David, have mercy on me. And Jesus standing, commanded him to be brought unto him. And when he was come near, he asked him, saying: What wilt thou that I do to thee? But he said: Lord, that I may see. And Jesus said to him: Receive thy sight; thy faith hath made thee whole. And immediately he saw, and followed him, glorifying God: and all the people, when they saw it, gave praise to God.

Why did Christ so often foretell His passion to His disciples?

Because He wanted to show how great was His desire to suffer for us, for we speak often of that which we crave; and because He wished His disciples when they should see Him treated as a criminal and martyred, not to think evil of Him, or imagine themselves deceived, but remember that He had foretold all minutely that all happened of His own will.

Did not the disciples  understand anything of what He predicted in regard to His future sufferings?

They may, certainly, have well understood He was to suffer, for which reason Peter tried to dissuade Him from it; (Matt. XVI. 22.) but they did not comprehend why or for what He would suffer, or how He would rise again. All this the Holy Ghost gave them to understand, after it had come to pass. (John XIV. 26.) The light of the Holy Ghost is of so much value, that without it even the clearest doctrines of faith are not understood.

Why does Christ so often call Himself the Son of Man?

He wished to show, in the Jewish way of speaking, He was also man, a descendant of Adam, and that we should be humble, and not seek or desire high titles.

Why did the blind man call Christ the Son of David?

Because, like all the Jews, he believed that the Messiah, according to humanity, would be of the house of David, as was promised. (Ps. CXXXI. 11.)

Why did Christ ask the blind man: What wilt thou that I do to thee?

This He asked, not because He was unaware of the blind man's wish, but to enable him the better to prove his faith and hope that through Christ he would receive his sight; and to teach us how willing He is to help us, and how it pleases Him if we confidingly place our wants before Him. We should learn from this blind man, who would not be restrained by the passing crowd in his ardent and reiterated request, not to pay attention, in the work we have commenced, to human respect, or human judgment, but to persevere, and not allow ourselves to be led astray by the world's mockery or contempt. We should also learn to be grateful to God, and faithfully cling to Him, if He has once opened the eyes of our mind, and healed our spiritual blindness, which is far more deplorable than physical blindness, for nothing can be more miserable than not to see and understand God, not to know what is necessary for our salvation, and what is pernicious.

Why is this gospel read on this Sunday?

The Church wishes to remind us of the painful passion and death of Jesus, and to move us by the contemplation of those mysteries to avoid and despise the wicked, heathenish amusements of carnival, sinful pleasures which she has always condemned, because they come from dark paganism, and, to avert the people from them, commands that during the three days of carnival the Blessed Sacrament shall be exposed for public adoration, sermons given, and the faithful exhorted to have recourse at this time to the Sacraments of Penance and the Blessed Sacrament of the Altar, with the reception of which Pope Clement XIII. (Breve, 23. June 1765) connected a plenary indulgence. A true Catholic will conform to the desire of his holy Church, considering the words which St. Augustine spoke, at this time, to the faithful, "The heathens (as also the worldly people of our days) shout songs of love and merriment, but you should delight in the preaching of the word of God; they rush to the dramatic plays, but you should hasten to Church; they are intoxicated, but you should fast and be sober."

PRAYER O most benign Jesus! who didst so desire to suffer for us, grant, that we may willingly suffer for love of Thee; that we may hate and flee from the detestable pleasures of the world and the flesh, and practice penance and mortification, that by so doing we may merit to be released from our spiritual blindness to love Thee more and more ardently, and finally possess Thee forever.

INSTRUCTION ON LENT

Who instituted Lent?

According to the fathers of the Church, Justin and Irenaeus, the fast before Easter was instituted and sanctified by Christ Himself; according to the saints Leo and Jerome, the holy apostles ordained it given by Jesus.

Why has the Church instituted this fast forty days before Easter?

To imitate Christ who fasted forty days; to participate in His merits and sufferings; to subject our flesh by voluntary mortification to the spirit, and to mortify our evil desires as did St. Paul; (Col. I. 24.) to enable us to lead a pure life, and thus prepare for the holy festival of Easter, and the reception of the divine Lamb, Jesus: and, finally, to render God satisfaction for our sins, and do penance, as Pope Gregory says, for the sins of one whole year by one short fast, lasting only the tenth part of a year.

Was the fast of Lent observed in early times as in the present?

Yes, but more strictly; for the people of the early ages not only abstained from meat, but also from all that which is connected with it, such as eggs, butter, cheese, etc., even from wine and fish, although this was not the general command of the Church; they fasted all day, and only ate in the evening after vespers, in remembrance of which, vespers are now said before dinner-time, because the Church, as a kind mother, now permits the supper to be changed into a dinner, and also allows something to be taken in the evening, that the body may not be too much weakened, and become unfit for labor.

How much does this ancient custom put to shame the Christians of to-day who think the fast in our times too severe! "But," asks St. Ambrose, "what sort of Christians are they? Christ, who never sinned fasted for our sins, and we will not fast for our own great and numerous offences?"

How should the holy season of Lent be spent?

As according to the teaching of St. Leo, the main thing in fasting is not that the body be deprived of food, but that the mind at the same time be withdrawn from wickedness, we should endeavor during Lent, not only to be temperate in eating and drinking, but especially to lead a modest life, sanctifying the days by persevering prayer and devoutly attending church.

PRAYER AT THE BEGINNING OF LENT

Almighty God! I unite myself at the beginning of this holy season of penance with the Church militant, endeavoring to make these days of real sorrow for my sins and crucifixion of the sensual man. O Lord Jesus! in union with Thy fasting and passion, I offer Thee my fasting in obedience to the Church, for Thy honor, and in thanksgiving for the many favors I have received, in satisfaction for my sins and the sins of others, and that I may receive the grace to avoid such and such a sin, N. N. and to practice such and such a virtue, N. N.