For All Members and Coordinators

 By Anna Von Reitz

“Fearless Floyd” is all TROH —The Reign of the Heavens Society— and you know who they are. Plagiarized Frank O’Collins work Ucantia and claimed it was their own.  Set up another offshore corporation and called it “The United States of America"— Incorporated, just like the Scottish Interloper after the Civil War. They advertised that anyone who joined their group after midnight on December 21st 2012 would be of lesser status forever, while those who signed up before that date would be part of the 144,000 elite rulers of the planet— showing a whole New Age Cultist side to the organization. 

They are Liars. And they accuse others of what they do themselves. 

So now they are accusing me of being a Liar and Scammer.  They robbed Frank O’Collins of his life’s work and then accused him of stealing from them. 

That’s the ilk of “people” you are dealing with now. But remember what I told you— they always accuse others of what they are doing themselves. 

The key point is that the Global Family Private Membership Association Credit Union is NOT part of the new Blue Dot Bilateral Bank System and it never was. 

Whoever told people that it was were lying. 

Hunter never offered anyone 22% interest.

Being a member of the PMA was never a requirement to get an account in “my” new Bank. 

Nobody here told anyone to open multiple bank accounts in various Federal Reserve affiliated banks. 

We have proof that a small group of people known as the “Fab Five” repeatedly told these lies to people and used strong arm tactics to coerce them and scare them. 

But Hunter and I didn’t tell them to do this. This was all stuff they were doing and saying on their own. 

So they pretended to be “representing” us and did these evil things and then they sabotaged the LRS and started the bank run on the State of California Credit Union.

Where have we seen this before? How many times have I told you what they do and how they do it? 

This whole “issue” has nothing whatsoever to do with me or our banks or our Assemblies. Zero. And Hunter did nothing wrong. He has been working overtime to clean up the mess they dumped on him and the PMA Credit Union. 

So be assured that their payback is coming and will be swift and just.  They are mad at me and lying their butts off because I had already captured their STRAWMEN and placed liens on them the last time they attacked me.  This time I am going to exercise those liens and take effective action to put an end to their evil organization once and for all.  What they have wished on others will be returned. 

Anna Maria

About "American Sign Language" and Parse Syntax

 By Anna Von Reitz

It's not what you think. 

When people say "sign language" we think of the hand signals pioneered by teachers of the deaf as a way to communicate without verbalizations, but there is another meaning to the words "American Sign Language" which literally conceives of language as symbol groups akin to business signs or Hieroglyphs.  

This form of "American Sign Language" is the new cover for an old evil known as "Dog Latin". 

The essence of Dog Latin is to use Latin grammar and style conventions and English words (or words from any other language) to cobble together what appears to be English, but is not English. It's actually gobbledygook on the page, but people still endeavor to read it and make sense of it. 

Latin uses all-capital letters when referencing slave populations and that's why this is called "Dog Latin" --that is, Latin for uneducated and ignorant "dogs".  

The most recent iteration of the use of Dog Latin (first used about 1500 years ago during the reign of the Roman Emperor Justinian) has been Parse Syntax, popularized by David-Wynn:Miller and Russell-J:Gould. 

During the week that we met with Russell in Texas, he made many claims for his copyrighted language conventions, including that it was mathematically correct -- which I promptly disproved. 

Then, he claimed that it was more precise than English or Latin.  I proved that Parse-Syntax can't reliably distinguish between a pickle and a cucumber. 

He told us that he signed a contract with the Vatican as a service provider and that Parse Syntax would be replacing "Legalese" and would be the language of all commercial contracts in the future. 

Legalese is a horrible excuse for a language, but Parse Syntax would be worse; Parse Syntax is just as wonky and deceitful as Legalese, but it is also hideously precise about its construction and punctuation.  One hyphen or colon or space out of place could void a whole agreement or change its meaning.  

Russell did not appear to know or care about the horrors he was about to unleash upon the world; he struggled for five days to perfect a single page contract in Parse Syntax and thought that this was just fine. 

Now, from digging around in my published and recorded documents, people have observed that I appear to use Parse Syntax for some things, but that is only an appearance. 

Faced with the threat of having world commerce reliant on such a horrible copyrighted language, my husband created his own copyrighted version of Dog Latin for use on the land, which has its own style conventions and punctuations. That is what I am using in my published recordings--- Jim's version, not Russell's. 

Having a second version makes it nearly impossible for the Vatican to carry forward with the purported intent to adopt Parse Syntax as the official language of commerce.  

And even if that disaster did happen, having a second version for use on the land means that we could continue to access the commercial jurisdiction without reference to the King's watery realm and without using Russell"s copyright. 

Using any form of Dog Latin is a joke, but those who take it seriously insist on being addressed in this quasi-language, so James came to the rescue and provided a separate version that is under Public Copyright. 

This prevents any bottleneck or special despotism related to Russell's private copyrighted version. 

We sincerely hope that the Universal Postal Union will reconsider its use of any form of Dog Latin, and we do not recommend the use of Dog Latin whether our version or Russell's. It is a "viperous text" neither fish nor fowl, not suited to plain speaking and certainly not mathematically correct and not ever likely to promote quiet contracts. 

Please just say no to the whole prospect and do not follow my lead in publishing paperwork in Dog Latin or otherwise promoting it; I did what I did because of my role as Fiduciary and the need to establish a secondary option under Public Copyright --- not as any commendation.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Reposting Good Old Malcolm Roberts

 By Anna Von Reitz

Some people are pithy and gracious trouble-makers for those who deserve trouble, and they just keep going at it for their entire lives.  Meet Malcolm Roberts and I quote his words of wisdom especially for our British, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, Aussie, Canadian and other former-Commonwealth friends: 

"Did the Medical Countermeasures Consortium run #COVID? The Australian, American, British & Canadian #military forces formed this consortium to dominate COVID response. Australia joined the consortium in 2012 under the Labor-Gillard government. A military-pharmaceutical apparatus linking the USA, Australia, Canada and the UK. Operation Warp Speed: The US Department of Defense signed the first contract between the US government and #Pfizer for the purchase of US$11 billion dollars worth of #vaccines. We know our Therapeutic Goods Administration (#TGA) did not review stage 2/3 trial data and instead relied on the US FDA, which took Pfizer's word for how the trials went! Pfizer committed systemic fraud during its trials, which has come out now through whistle-blowers' testimony and in the release of Pfizer's own data. Pfizer, it seems, gave the US government the vaccine they asked for. It was developed using #gainoffunction research in conjunction with #Wuhan in #China and, of course, #AnthonyFauci. The military-pharmaceutical in action. These are matters to be dealt with in a Royal Commission. The Royal Commission that was promised by the Albanese government. Call a Royal Commission into COVID now!"

Yes, what a good idea, Malcolm. Time to roast some Pfizer buns over charcoal and follow up with investigation into the activities of the Wellcome Trust which has been a Perpetrator of medical crimes since the 1850s and the Pirbright Institute as well.

Covid isn't "just" an American or Chinese problem. 

The true genesis of the current malady started in Britain well-over a hundred years ago and simply manifested as this particular viral bioweapon now. 

All the hateful racist and elitist ideas and prejudices embodied by Lord Pirbright, Henry Wellcome and Cecil Rhodes --- and all the money they left in their endowments --- have provided the seedbed of this current genocide and its development since the 1960's. 

Time to get to the bottom of the dog pile.  A Royal Commission to flame-broil the US Perpetrators, and a Congressional Special Committee to roast their British counterparts.  

What say you, people of the world?  Shall we stop the Good Cop - Bad Cop nonsense, and dig out the root of this evil once and for all?  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Self-Sustaining.... My Laugh for the Day

 By Anna Von Reitz

I was recently asked if our American Government is "self-sustaining" and the answer of course, is yes. 

We don't have any choice about that. 

A government of, for, and by the people of this country must be self-sustaining in order to be sovereign. 

My husband and I have been "sustaining" the American Government for twenty-five years and so have a lot of other people, who have weighed in and sustained it through thick and thin.  

It's because of this support and sustenance that the American Government still exists today. 

But I think that more to her point, the lady asking wanted to know --- why do you take donations to keep your government running?  Don't governments have all the money in the world and the ability to print more?  

We certainly wouldn't be asking for donations if we had control of our own assets; unfortunately for the whole world, our assets were commandeered by British pirates 162 years ago, and between them, the British Monarchs, the Lord Mayors of the Inner City of London, and the Popes, have contrived to present themselves as our "representatives" and have acted as Executors de Son Tort ever since. 

So what is an "Executor de Son Tort" --? It's anyone who steps in and takes over and runs your estate as if you were dead and as if he were your lawful chosen executor--  without your agreement and usually to your detriment. 

First, they had to pretend we were "dead" and that our Government was "missing" and "in interregnum" and "absent" --- which only appeared to be the case because of things these Bounders did. 

Then, they pretended to have a "custodial interest" in our "abandoned" estates and persons, and they settled in and have bullied and pillaged and run this country and its people into the ground ever since. 

And, of course, the banks run by the same Perpetrators allowed this.  And the Bar Associations run by the same Perpetrators allowed this. 

We, the actual people who live in this country and who are in fact its government,  are the only ones who spoke up and pointed out that we are still here, hello, and we didn't appoint these fellows to act as our executors. 

Now we have to arm wrestle them to get our own assets back and put them under our own control, which is more difficult than you might think. 

These self-appointed executors and custodians have grown fat and happy from confiscating our private property illegally and taxing us unlawfully and misrepresenting us and selling us out. 

They've passed no less than 80 million administrative "laws" for us to obey  and provided hundreds of "services" we never contracted with them to provide. 

They have pretended to the rest of the world that that is all right with us and pretended that we acquiesced to all that they have done "for" us, but in fact the vast bulk of our population has been kept in the dark and fed, well, you know what we've been fed: television "programming" and still more false indoctrination in schools for the public.   

One of the things they did "for" us was to use legal jargon and semantic deceits to misidentify us as British Territorial U.S. Citizens and then, they presumed that we were under the law of the sea, and not standing on the land and soil of our country anymore.  

So they have evaded their own contractual obligations and the Constitutional Guarantees we are owed by pretending that we are not Americans.  In this way, they have endeavored to depopulate and vacate this entire country on paper, and clear the way for claims on abandonment made by themselves and their creditors.

They did this using unconscionable contracts foisted off on us while we were still babies in our cradles. 

And all the while, they pretended to be our Best Friends Forever.  They sanctimoniously talked about "freedom" while enslaving us, and have behaved just like the Raj in India. 

They got away with it and it worked so well in America simply by singing "Yankee Doodle Dandy" and otherwise keeping their mouths shut, that they decided to apply the same schtick to the rest of the known world and to unlawfully convert all the  national governments into corporations merely in the business of providing government services for profit.

Of course, this amounts to national-level identity theft and it's all a gigantic criminal fraud in breach of trust and honor.  

So, yes, our American Government is self-sustaining.  It always has been, and had to be. 

We take donations because these criminals have  cashiered our assets so that we don't have the keys to our own doors and access to our own gold.

Instead, we have to fight with their creditors and go through hell proving who we are and where we come from and what our political status is, thanks to their phony registration processes. 

So, yes, Lady in the Audience, we take donations until the day that we get cooperation to shut these phony "government corporations" down and stop their war-profiteering, until the day our own military wakes up and stops working for SERCO, and until everyone on Earth joins with us to put an end to the Raj and the thuggish corporate feudalism that goes with it.   

Yes, we are self-sustaining. We will be able to sustain ourselves a lot better once we get more of our gold and other assets back in our control, where it always should have been.  Until then, if you would like to contribute to the effort, our assemblies are gathering worldwide.  

You can send cash, checks, and money orders, stamps, information, articles, questions, insights, and prayers of assistance to me and our Federation of States to: Anna Maria Riezinger, In care of: Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Double Meanings for Different Things

 By Anna Von Reitz

My Readers are no strangers to the kinds of deceitful games the rats play with words and names, so it should come as no surprise that the same applies to entire phrases and definitions.

Let me offer some helpful guidance through this morass of misspeak and run through an example that is currently causing a lot of problems. 

David Straight has encouraged millions of people, especially U.S. Citizens, to "correct" their political status to that of an "American State National". He has done this on the basis of Federal Code found in Title 8--- 8 USC 1101 (a) (21) --(I think) but regardless of the exact citation, the point is that--- Number One,  he has justified this on the basis of Federal Code. 

Now, other people, also citing Federal Codes have come forward and said, "No, no, no! You can get in trouble making a claim to be an American State National....and they then cite their Federal Code sources, saying, the term "American State National" only applies to American Samoans, etc.

It's a typical Federal Code Ballywhump, where nobody is reading the Code correctly and where people are not being helped, because they don't have the tools to sort out the verbiage. 

And both parties are right --- to an extent. 

Let's begin with the fact that Federal Code does not apply to Joe Average in any broad way.  

You, American, eating your lunch beside a railroad track, may have unknowingly come into physical Federal jurisdiction, or maybe you knowingly entered Federal jurisdiction by going to the Post Office, and therefore need to obey the Federal Codes attached to those environs. 

You might actually be engaged in interstate commerce, though that is unlikely and an unnecessary supposition.  

You might be engaged in the manufacture, sale, or transportation of alcohol, tobacco, or firearms across state lines. 

You might be operating a boat or ship or barge.

You might be licensed as a Uniformed Officer, like a Medical Doctor or Registered Nurse.  

But, the point is, aside from such special occupations and locations, the vast majority of you are not "generally subject" to Federal Code.  

Federal Code applies to Federal employees and their direct dependents -- either military or Federal Civil Service. 

Now doesn't that make sense?  Federal Code applies to Federal Employees. Just like Federal Income means profits derived from Federal employment.

So that is the first issue: the use of Federal Code when talking about or to Joe Average American is generally speaking not appropriate.  Patriots constantly make this mistake and it is a Big Mistake.  

Ask yourself: why reference Federal Code if it does not apply to you? 

The only reason that a member of our General Public would have to reference Federal Code is to convince Public Employees that they are in violation of their own Code, and if that is what you are doing, you must make that very explicit.  

"Yes, you are a Public Employee, and here is the pertinent Federal Code you need to obey...." 

Estimates are that 92-95% of all Federal Code has no application related to Joe Average American, so, unless your are a Public Employee, please stop this pernicious habit of trying to justify everything according to Federal Code.  

I repeat: unless you are engaged in a federally regulated activity or know that you are physically in a federally regulated location -- an army base, a post office, a railroad corridor, etc. -- Federal Code does not apply to you. 

David Straight is trying to help people like himself who have, for one reason or another, a compelling reason to adopt British Territorial United States (U.S.) Citizenship.  They typically adopt this political status because of their employment and lose their Constitutional Guarantees as a result. 

He is trying to show them a way that they can reclaim their guarantees and make use of their ability to adopt Dual Citizenship/Nationality. 

So David is trying to help Federal Employees and the use of Federal Code could be appropriate, but in this case, it isn't.  Why?  Because his critics are right, the phrase "American State National" as used in Federal Code only applies to American Samoans. 

Please notice the words "as used in Federal Code".  

When these same words "American State National" are applied outside of Federal Code, in the world where actual people speak plain English, they apply to anyone born or naturalized within the physical borders of an actual State of the Union. 

So in Federal-ese, the words "American State National" refer to the political status of American Samoans.  In Common Parlance, the same words, "American State National" mean anyone born or naturalized within the physical borders of an actual State of the Union.  

How do you tell the difference between the two? 

 

When the words are written on paper, they look identical, and when they are spoken, they sound the same. 

Hints are provided from context, but the only sure way to tell the difference is to know the definition you are using and say it or write it out. 

The bureaucrats resort to using Latin conventions--- and use "American State National" to refer to American Samoans' political status, and American "state national" to refer to those born or naturalized in the States of the Union. 

Even though English is our official language, the use of Latin style conventions has been allowed as an exception since 1851. 

This just adds to the confusion for Joe Average American, who according to English, assumes that he is an American State National, when in the Federal System he is an American state national. 

Obviously, there are considerable communications obstacles embedded in this situation, obstacles that can be overcome by tediously expressing the definitions you are using, or, by adopting Latin style conventions, or both. 

Such differences can also be exploited by unscrupulous persons. 

When you are claiming your birthright political status and you are obligated to maintain U.S. Citizenship for some reason, its necessary to establish what you mean by "American State National" versus what they mean by "American State National" --- and because your meaning comes from Common Usage, it's inappropriate to reference Federal Code which assigns a totally different meaning to the same words. 

There.  Does that help?   

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

About Your Courts

 By Anna Von Reitz

One of the red-herring issues we have had to fight is the idea that the "missing" Article III Courts mentioned in the Constitutions are the key to fixing our wrecked judicial system.  

People think: our courts are missing, and these courts are missing, and therefore, they must be our missing courts.... 

Not so. The Article III Courts are Federal Courts of limited jurisdiction that used to be administered by the vacated Federal Republic and served by the Federal Marshals. 

The only Article III Court still functioning is the Federal Claims Court.  

Some of the functions that the Article III Courts once handled are now handled by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.  

So you can stop looking for the "missing" Article III Courts. 

They will be restored once the Confederation of States and Federal Republic are restored, but even then, they won't be able to fix the justice system. 

The answer to that lies much closer to home, with your own State Courts, which have been largely vacated since 1965. 

People have been mistaking "State of State" Courts for State Courts, but look sharp.   

The "Superior Court of the State of Nevada" is not the same as the "Superior Court of Nevada". 

Your State Courts are courts of "general jurisdiction".  

This means you can investigate anything you want and pretty much address any situation that causes injury to people or property.  

There is only one caveat: you, yourselves, must each declare, record, and publish your birthright political status, form your State Assembly, and out of the ranks of your General Assembly membership, organize your Jural Assembly to staff and administer your State Courts and provide the Jury Pool for them.

This is the only way you can guarantee yourselves a jury of your peers. 

The Jural Assembly is one of the Four Pillars of each State Assembly and for some reason, it has proven to be the hardest one to organize. People are stymied by the prospect of running their own courts, but it has to be done, and we are helped because our courts are extremely simple compared to the foreign courts we are used to. 

Our own State Courts are the "missing courts" and their absence is what has allowed the court system to become a mockery. 

I have suggested two handy guidebooks to help Assembly members with the basic education needed to set up their State Courts. 

The first guidebook is called, "Establishing the Reign of Natural Liberty - A Common Law Training Manual" which is issued by the International Common Law Court of Justice.  

The other is called, "Common Law Handbook for Jurors, Sheriffs, Bailiffs and Justices" and appears to be published by the National Liberty Alliance. 

Both are available on Amazon and may be available soon on your TASA website store. 

The first guidebook (above) is extremely helpful and to the point and academically correct. I have no reservations about it or the advice it gives -- with one caution. This is a guidebook for the exercise of Land Law, which is international in nature. Be aware that Local Law exercised at the County level is somewhat different and will require additional information before you set up your County Courts. 

The second guidebook is published by the National Liberty Alliance and as usual with them, offers a plethora of helpful information that is correct overall, but also disjointed and confused. 

As examples, this book gives an excellent short history of the Sheriff's Office, and then fails to make the necessary distinction between a Sheriff acting as a Peacekeeper and a Sheriff engaged in Law Enforcement.  It talks about "registering" instead of "recording".  They use Dog Latin (all capital letters) and rely on rulings from Federal Courts to shed light on American Common Law -- which the Federal Courts don't practice.

Another problem is NLA's emphasis on the importance and power of the Grand Jury -- which is true, except that the Grand Jury goes completely legless without an underlying court system to act upon its findings. 

Which lack just happens to be what we are in the process of solving... 

With all these issues against it, you might wonder why I would recommend this second guidebook by the National Liberty Alliance at all.  I can only say that like most books published by the patriot community there are nuggets of gold in it and the nuggets are worth having, even if you have to be prepared to sort the wheat from the chaff. 

Finally, we have a mega-tome, a monstrous good work, Excellence of the Common Law, by Brent Winters, who also gives workshops and seminars. 

Go forth and conquer. Enter into your vacated courts of the people, your superior courts of general jurisdiction.  

Organize your State Assembly. Identify your General Assembly using the declaration, recording, and publishing process; and then, pull together your Jural Assembly from the membership of the General Assembly, so that all is in accord with Law and Custom.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Certain Members and Non-Members

 By Anna Von Reitz

Certain members and non-members of The Oregon Assembly have been deriding my simple suggestion that they look around in old bookshops and rare book services and find themselves American History and Government textbooks like we used a hundred years ago or more, if they want "proof" of how State Assemblies are supposed to be organized. 

Can anyone tell me how else you are supposed to know for sure how your government was organized in the past without consulting books published in the past?  

I wasn't alive in 1840 or even 1900.  Were you?

So how do we know how State Assemblies are structured?  How do we know what functions they perform?  We read old books. 

We've kindly done the research already and shared the results, but certain knotheads want more. They don't trust us.  They want to see it for themselves. 

So, I suggested that they do the same thing I did myself and go find old textbooks on the subject and read it for themselves, because that is the only way that they will be convinced anyhow. 

What is more intriguing is why would that suggestion provoke ridicule?  

We aren't supposed to trust textbooks about our government published in the 1850's?  They were "lying" back then, too? 

I used to have these same kinds of arguments about the peacetime flag. 

First, I was told that there was no such thing as a peacetime flag.  

Then, once that was settled in my favor, I was told there was no evidence of the peacetime flag actually being used. 

I brought forward a description of it being used as recorded in Nathaniel Hawthorne's novel, The Scarlet Letter, written and published during the time period the peacetime flag was flown.  

My critics slunk back into the corner because they had no other choice, but that was a single simple thing.  

The structure and function of a State Assembly is much more complex, and if you want to confirm what I am telling you for yourselves you are going to have to do the work I did. 

A member of The Minnesota Assembly went and did what I suggested. She's all excited.  She started reading books published in 1937 and she couldn't believe all the amazing stuff she found, all the practical, useful information these old books contained. 

Our Predecessors weren't fools. They were better educated about a lot of things than we are today. And they spent more time reading.  

No wonder their textbooks and reference books are more informative than Wikipedia. 

I sent the Oregon people a copy of her happy email and pages she scanned to show me the kind and quality of information she found in these old books---and gave them a taste of what they are missing. 

I wasn't blowing them off.  I was telling them how I have learned most of what I have learned -- which is by reading old books and periodicals.  

If you want "proof" that what I am telling you is true, then you have to do what I did and educate yourselves the same way. And the easiest way to learn about the structure of the American Government is by reading old textbooks on the subject. 

Remember that a third of our government was blown away in the so-called Civil War, so if you want to know "for sure" how our Government is meant to be and function you have to go back at least 100 years and more like 150 to a time when our State Assemblies were in regular Session and the original Confederation formed in 1781 was still functioning or at least well-remembered.  

This requires consulting "rare" books and buying them is usually the only way to consult them, because most libraries have not preserved the old books. 

Amazon has a rare book department and also a textbook department that can be helpful, and there are numerous rare book sellers like ABE Books that keep search lists and let you know when something comes in. 

A basic old textbook might cost you $30-50, and a more extensive encyclopedia-type book might cost anywhere from $150 to $500, but if you think I am blowing any sunshine up your skirts and feel the need to know "for sure" this is how you do it. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.