Ewww! Half a Billion Stolen From Our Collective "Income Taxes"

By Anna Von Reitz

Most people don't know this, but the "Income tax" got its start during the 1100's, with an "obligatory tithe" on "income" called "Peter's Pence", which was collected in Britain and France by the Inquisition every April 15th, to support the cost of wars in the Middle East --- the Crusades.  

Sound familiar?  

So here we learn that a half billion has been improperly siphoned from our "Peter's Pence" funds --- all the loot taken from us as "Income Taxes" under false pretenses and presumption that we are "voluntarily" adopting Municipal United States political status as "citizens of the United States" and that we are all members of the Municipal religious cult, too.

  

Well, here's your "Holy Cause" as stated by FDR during his First Inaugural Address--- which will make more sense now that you know the history of "Peter's Pence" ---- however, apparently, the current Church thinks that this money is being set aside for purposes other than making war, as you will gather from the comments in this video:  

https://youtu.be/cVtmsuQPV3k 

It looks like a scheme to set up a new bank in the Inner City of London, plus Benefits, of course.  

Which gives us pause, because the Vatican and its various affiliates already have any number of banks all over the world.  Why misappropriate half a billion of income taxes (that most of us never owed) to buy another bank building under the auspices of Westminster?  

How very strange. 

It all makes me ill to consider how many people have been unknowingly and unwillingly enslaved and suffered in peonage to this scam, and for what?  

Let's bring them all forward and question them?  

What, at the end of the day, was all this criminality about?  

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

My Reply to More Questions --- Purportedly from Flag Officers

By Anna Von Reitz

I have been assured that I am corresponding with a liaison for the Flag Officers of this country, and there has been some corroboration of that, but I am beginning to think that my leg is being pulled. If this is indicative of the level of knowledge possessed by military officers at the Flag level, we are all in a lot of trouble. See for yourselves:

From Flags:

I don't know where to begin except to say this Judge Anna woman needs help. Some serious help because she shouldn't believe the crap she writes and spews as it makes her seem to be a very delusional person. Maybe someone is feeding her this crap and she bought into it. We pray she gets some help. Paul, I will only communicate with you so at least you know of the truth do, document and we share - and it's free Plus, POTUS and Barr are very aware of what we have done and what's in queue.

From Anna:

Then why is it that Senior JAG Officials agree with me and not with you? Why is it that they have told everyone the truth --- that there have been hundreds if not thousands of such "Arbitration Awards" over the years, and not one of them fulfilled? I am aware of this. Why aren't you, if you are such an expert?

Where were you when General Roy took the Farm Union Cases to the United States Supreme Court? Why do I know what they told him and you don't? Face it, you just got involved in all this ---at most 3-4 years ago-- and you are trying to assert that you know more about it than someone who has spent more than forty years studying this situation. Keep going on like this, and you will continue to be utterly useless and also in dereliction of duty.

From Flags:

Paul, you may want to ask her, how is a claim (Phil's) of your actual birthrights from the Creator not superior to a fiction of law American?

From Anna:

Apples and oranges again, or more like apples and kumquats. The Kingdom of Heaven has nothing to do with "the" Kingdom of God. Same basic confusion. Same logic default. Maybe if you get one "Aha!" moment, you will be able to see it all, but until then, you just make assumptions and more assumptions, and in the process try to put words in my mouth.

I have been in the front lines with Kurt Kallenbach, revealing that the Divine Origin of each of us has been "papered over" by the "birth day" (recorded entrance time) and then again by the "birth date" (registered exit time). The situation is like being marooned at sea and claiming to be, instead, out in the middle of Kansas.

Our actual point of incarnation occurs by an Act of God resulting in fertilization of an egg and formation of a unique zygote from which all else follows. That's the truth and that's where our Divine Birthright originates from, along with our Natural and Unalienable Rights. But Phil made no reference to any of that. He stayed firmly out to sea. So who is "delusional"?

From Flags:

She claims State national is highest yet now claims American? Where are the docs allowing all capacities, characters, conditions, status and standings utilized and effectuated today by the alleged government? Why doesn't she post proof of her definitions. It seems she is always saying in a round about way this is the way it is and so what.

From Anna:

That's because even though I gave you explicit directions and proof of exactly where these different kinds of political status are defined --- and repeat myself --- you still try to pretend that I haven't answered you when I have answered you---and far more than one time.

Here it is again:

American State National defined at: 8 USC 1101 (a) 21.

American State Citizen defined at: 8 USC 1101 (a) 22 (B).

United States Citizen and Municipal citizen of the United States defined in any of the three (3) Constitutions at: Article 1, Section 3, Clause 3 and Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2.

And as for me saying, "So what?" --- it's because you are bringing forward non-issues as if they were issues, or as if they were cause for surprise or discussion. Why wouldn't the King be Arch-Treasurer of a British Territorial corporation doing business as "the" United States of America?

That doesn't make him Arch-Treasurer of the American Federation of States doing business as The United States of America----which is what you are trying to claim.

From Flags:

I am sure during our next meeting which is to be held again at the Charlottesville Winery I could really impress the Flag Officers and Eric if I could produce J Pegs from Anna of the 3 Constitutions she speaks of. But she won't and you know why.

From Anna:

And why would I have to provide you with anything that you can easily go out and obtain for yourself and which you have a duty to obtain---- and follow ---- if you call yourself a "Flag Officer" ?

Go to the Congressional Library ---like we all did--- to satisfy yourself that I am not just making this up, because with your disgusting attitude, I could give you mint condition copies of the original documents delivered on a silver platter, and you would say I faked them.

Remember these are the names and dates of the Constitutions:

1. The Constitution for the united States of America (1787)

2. The Constitution of the United States of America (1789)

3. The Constitution of the United States (1790)

And don't try to pretend (again) that your lack of Due Diligence is my fault or responsibility.

From Flags:

At this point the Flag asked me to tell Anna they would like to speak with the continental marshals she claims to be working with and what is their contact info? I told them that's the BS she makes up to keep her ignorant lemming followers continuing to follow her music of baiting hope never to deliver anything.. Yes, that request was made in jest as they have read much of the incoherent statements and claims on her website.

From Anna:

I suggest that they speak directly with Senior Chief Marshal Tresa Haywood. I will give Paul the contact information to pass on to you. She is nice and polite, but, she has her ducks in order ---and isn't likely to take any guff or put up with any insulting presumptions. Read that: incoming stovepipe.

From Flags:

I and those around me follow the law and most of them are old and some very old and hidden from most. Arbitration in its common law form developed in England; in the Middle Ages, in tribunals such as the Courts of the Boroughs. Courts became suspicious of arbitration; for example, in Kill v. Hollister (1746), an English court ruled that the arbitration agreement could 'oust' courts of law and equity of jurisdiction. Arbitration was common in the early United States, with George Washington serving as an arbiter on an occasion. And the Arbitration process has been used ever since. However, its been used mostly by the selfserving impostors.

From Anna:

"Arbitration" is Law-by-Contract, and it doesn't work unless there is an Arbitration Clause built into the contract to begin with.

Trying to enforce a one-sided arbitration results in attempted unilateral contracting process, which is why none of these numerous "successful" arbitration actions work.

Both the people bringing the issue and the people issuing the judgment didn't check: (1) the status and standing of the Claimant relative to the Claim; (2) the existence of an Arbitration Clause in the contract; (3) the proper jurisdiction of the Law being addressed, which must match the jurisdiction which the Claimant is claiming.

Phil loses on all three counts.

As I keep trying to tell you, as far as law is concerned, there are no living men in the international jurisdiction of the sea, nor in the global jurisdiction of the air ---either one.

So Phil has an unenforceable arbitration award and you are trying to make yourselves out to be Great Sages.

For the record:

Arbitration only works and exists in the realm of contract law.

So here is Phil Hudok, claiming to be a living man owed all his rights, using a process of contract law that only applies to corporations and officers of corporations, that is, to Persons, and trying to apply it to a contract that has no arbitration clause applicable to him. Brilliant. Simply brilliant.

Why don't you all stop embarrassing yourselves? It only gets worse from here on.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

  

The Spirit of the True God Moves Us

By Anna Von Reitz

The Spirit of the True God moves us and gives us enlightenment; the Holy Spirit is called The Counselor, and The Comforter, because the Holy Spirit was sent here to do both things pending the final resurrection and construction of Heaven on Earth.  

Our Father, also a Spirit, gives us life and health and the fullness of our being, our consciousness, and our bodily incarnation --- but his Spirit also gives us insight and answers and solace.  

We make a huge mistake when we rely on our own resources and take counsel with our own thoughts---- because we have open access to so much more, and so much assistance is ours, if we simply ask for it and accept help.  

How do you all think I have come to know all the things that I have revealed to you?  I have not come to this knowledge by myself.  

I have asked for help and I have been given help, and it is the same for everyone else.  If I am "special" in any way, it is only that I had the humility and horse sense to ask and knock and recognize the hand of God extended to me, enlightening my mind and lightening my load and giving me the answers. 

The relationship is very much like that of any other parent and a child.  

So long as your child is happy and progressing on their own, even if they fall down from time to time, you let them continue to exercise their free will and learn on their own.   But when your child comes to you with a problem they can't solve, you pause and help them. 

It is the same with the Holy Spirit.  He will pause and help you with whatever you need, if you ask for help.  

Once you ask, you need to relax and let the answers come.  There is usually a time delay of between three and thirty days, but the answers will come. 

Now as to all those gossips who say, "Why was she talking to and working for the Pope (Benedict XVI)?"  --- I have this to say: 

(1)  I was shown by the Holy Spirit that the Pope was in control of it all, both the British Territorial Government and the Municipal Government, so I took the problem to him under the Spirit's guidance; 

(2) Pope Benedict XVI responded and tried to help despite great danger and personal cost to himself; I have no doubt that he truly wasn't told what was going on, and I have proof that he took immediate good faith action to correct --- including sending me and many others to give Notice to his employees worldwide, telling them to correct their operations; 

(3) Pope Francis has been a different story.  He focuses on circling the wagons and reorganizing the church and indulges in efforts to keep the venal machinery of the Roman Pontificate intact, howbeit, operating through a new storefront -- that of the United Nations organization, instead of the Roman Catholic Church.  That is to say, he is moving to relocate the problem and expand upon it. 

So what I have spoken to you about all these things does not come from my limited awareness, but from my Counselor and Teacher, the Holy Spirit.  If any of you have any question about the truth of what I have said or are struggling to verify it, ask him.  You will be shown and guided. 

If anyone has any further question about why it is necessary to address the Pope in order to bring peace to this country and to the world --- consider that both the corporations engaged in this "war" on our soil are owned and controlled by the Pope.  

One is controlled by the Pope indirectly, as the Queen serves him to administer the Commonwealth aka British Territorial Government, and the other is more obviously and directly connected via the Municipal Government.  

He controls both the "teams" of pirates that have been attacking us under color of law. 

And he will still control both teams of pirates and they will still continue to attack us, even if the Queen is no longer involved and even if the Roman Catholic Church is "officially" removed from the field and replaced by the United Nations. 

It would still be a farce in which the United Nations controlled by the Pope does battle with his own Municipal Government, and we, the miserable civilian population would still be misidentified and caught in the middle.  

So the problem is the Pope, and so is the solution with the Pope.  

We must contend with the Evil in High Places --- the secretive and venal competing religion of Babylon.  We must contend with the Spirit of Falsehood. 

We must expose this Evil at every turn.  

We must deal with the entire misguided "Church Militant" that believes in killing "for" Jesus.   We must deal with the oxymoron posed by the "Secular Church".  

And this must be done from inside the Roman Catholic Church and from outside the Roman Catholic Church.  

Just as we have been played "both ends against the middle" for a century and a half by two foreign governmental services corporations, both ultimately working for the Pope, the Church must be --- not attacked --- but cleansed as with good soap and hot water, from within and without. 

The Roman Catholic Church must not allowed to carry on as it has been, promoting war, betraying trust, avoiding its treaty obligations via constructive fraud, and generally causing trouble as it pursues a Secret Agenda of world conquest veiled even from its own members.  

This despicable and duplicitous behavior on the part of the Roman Catholic Church has to be recognized for what it is, and the Church must be "called on the carpet" by the entire world, most especially by its membership, its laymen, its organizations, and its clergy. 

Let us suggest that there are a lot hotter topics for the Curia to discuss and for the clergy to address, than returning to a policy of allowing married priests. 

How about giving up the Doctrine of Scarcity and the Doctrine of Collective Entities?   Throwing it out, just as you have thrown out the Doctrine of Discovery?  They are all bunk.  They all cause misery.   

How about ending the "Church Militant" and all the nastiness that goes on because of that?  When is the last time that the Church was in mortal danger, as opposed to causing mortal danger for others?  

How about voluntarily ending the whole farcical pretense of fronting "wars" between the church's own business interests, and using this as an excuse for attacking bystanders?  

How about calling a halt to attempts to use any good organization, including the actual Church or the United Nations, as a storefront to conduct operations that are by their very nature and existence ---- evil? 

These are the Hot Topics that the top clergy of the Roman Catholic Church needs to be discussing, because believe me, the rest of the world is watching, and so is The Kingdom of Heaven.   

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Why Peace Treaty 2020 Won't Work

By Anna Von Reitz

Don't get me wrong. It's a fine idea.....but.....

For a Treaty to be valid you need to have certain things straight, and as with everything else these guys are doing or attempting to do, they don't have the verbiage straight. They are still confused by the similar names deceit, and as a result, they keep making the same mistakes.

As I observed about Phil Hudok. He didn't reclaim his rightful birthright as an American by his actions. He reclaimed his birthright as a British Territorial United States Citizen ---- as if he had been born in Guam.

And that's why the King's Courts are so willing to give him succor and relief as a poor Pauper of the Commonwealth coming before the King's Bench for relief --- as in "welfare relief".

The same kinds of mistakes are self-evident in the Peace Treaty 2020 document, so that's a non-starter from the beginning.

So that is one insurmountable issue.

Another is that in order for a peace treaty to work and be valid, you have to have the correct parties signing it---- and for the moment, that is as impossible now as it was 150 years ago.

The American Civil War was a Mercenary Conflict fought on our soil by two opposing sets of Federal Service Providers. The Big Dogs in the fight were the members of the Confederation formed by The Articles of Confederation in 1781, what we call "the North and South" or, "the Union and the Confederacy".

In fact, both the North and South were members of the original Confederacy, so it is more proper to think in terms of the Northern Confederation vs. the Southern Confederation.

It's also necessary to know that these "Confederate States" were not "States" in the sense that we typically think of the word, and also, were not our States of the Union.

They were the original American States of States operating as businesses to provide our States and People with services at the federal level.

So you have actual States that are members of our Federation of States, and you have States of States that are supposed to function as members of the Confederation. Apples and oranges. Actual States and States of States.

It was the original States of States business organizations that fought the Civil War.

So, The State of New York went to war with The State of South Carolina, for example, and these were the entities that conducted the entire war.

You can easily prove this by looking at the war rosters of men being inducted into the service on both sides of the conflict. They were mustered out as companies representing "The State of ___________".

These powerful business interests were the primary combatants, but both the Territorial and Municipal United States "Federal Service Providers" also got involved.

The Territorial United States entity dba "the" United States of America sided with the North. The Municipal United States entity dba "the" United States sided with the South.

Thus, to have a valid Peace Treaty ending the conflict, the parties to it would have to be fighting an actual declared war -- which they weren't, and all the parties would have to sign it, which is impossible because the Confederate States --- both North and South --- ceased functioning.

The Northern Confederacy was bankrupted in 1863, and the Southern Confederacy was "ruined" and rendered unable to function by the Grand Army of the Republic, and neither one was ever reconstructed.

So, the Big Dogs in the fight are no longer present and in a condition to sign a Peace Treaty, even if a Peace Treaty were the appropriate instrument to end a Mercenary Conflict ---- which it is not. [What you are looking for, is a "Peace Accord" similar to what they did in Vietnam.]

Their respective allies, the British Territorial United States dba "the" United States of America and the Municipal United States dba "the" United States are still present, but they've turned all this into a big joke and used it as an excuse to continue a totally bogus "war" on our shores ever since.

Pending the Reconstruction, of course.

The reason that I call the continuing mercenary war between the British United States and the Municipal United States "bogus" is that they are both working for the Pope and always have been.

The Territorial Government works for him indirectly, and the Municipal Government works for him directly, so the whole thing is a spoof played from both ends against the middle.

The Queen manages the British Commonwealth for the Pope, so she is the Pope's employee in this matter, and the Municipal Government works directly for the Pope, so you are treated to the spectacle of two Roman Catholic business entities "fighting" each other for profit.

And an entire civilian population owed their "Good Faith and Service" being pillaged and plundered by their own employees using these specious excuses.

So what you are actually looking for is called a "Peace Accord" and in order to get it, you have to reconstruct the American States of States, both North and South.

All right, well, the Government of the People, by the People, and for the People is a living government composed of Lawful Persons defined as State Citizens ---- living Americans who accept their Public Duty and populate the actual States of the Union by serving the State Government in various capacities ----Jurors, Deputies, Justices, and so on.

Our first obstacle is that thanks to continuing Gross Breach of Trust on the part of the Popes and British Monarchs, we have all been deliberately misidentified and mis-characterized as either Territorial United States Citizens or Municipal "citizens of the United States".

According to them, this entire country is populated by Federal Employees. And if you believe that, I have some Florida real estate to sell....

This results in a situation wherein we have to go back and deliberately, knowingly correct our political status records.

After we go through all that Turkey Trot and notify the United States Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, we can function as State Citizens, can organize our actual States, and can then "reconstruct" the American States of States, both North and South.

But even though we must do our best to accomplish this whole task of assembling our States and reconstructing our States of States (which we are doing) that is still no guarantee of peace.

Why? Because the Pope, that Diva of Peace and Love [purportedly], continues to make commercial war against us under these deplorably and inexcusably False Pretenses. His employee in this matter, Elizabeth II, continues on with the charade.

His other employee in this matter, the Secretary General of the United Nations, is playing his part to a "t" and cannot be trusted to act as our Trustee ---- a set up engineered by Jimmy Carter's Administration --- because he, Antonio Guterres, is a lifelong subject of the Pope.

I almost burst out laughing when I heard Pope Francis sanctimoniously saying that we must obey the United Nations --- that is, obey his employee, Antonio Guterres.

It's the same game, folks. Whether it is the British Queen indirectly doing the Pope's bidding, or the Secretary General of the United Nations indirectly doing the Pope's bidding.

It all comes down to the gross malfunctioning of the Roman Curia and the Roman Catholic Church and the Office of the Pope.

If you want peace in this world, you have found the epicenter of perpetual war --- the so-called "Church Militant"--- and you now have a firmer grasp on what you are really dealing with.

May all the Roman Catholics reading this wake up and realize just how despicable and two-faced the behavior of the "Church" has been on this and on many, many other occasions ---- and take action accordingly.

May all the world leaders reading this wake up and deal with the situation at the United Nations, which is being primed as the new "store front" for these hypocrites.

May all the Americans reading this wake up and reclaim their political status as Americans; all of us who are not in the military nor in the Federal Civil Service at this time, are free to repudiate all claims that we are any species of Federal Citizen at all.

Unless you all want to live under the thumb of the Inquisition and under the control of a dirty theocracy run by hypocrites, it's time to convince the Pope that the whole carefully planned set up is blown.

And as for Mr. Trump? He can do what Andrew Johnson did, and create a binding commercial contract on the rats by three times Declaring the Peace in Public.

It will take a concerted effort on all our parts to ride herd on the members of Congress to make sure that such a Peace is honored, but it can be done internally, and Mr. Guterres will be obligated to obey our internal Peace Accord.

If they welch on it, every country in the world will know who to bomb and who to avoid as business partners and allies.

The Brits appear to be waking up after a very long slumber and so do the erstwhile members of the Commonwealth.

We have 27 of our States of the Union assembled and populated --- a majority position capable of conducting business for The United States of America. And more Americans are waking up to the clear and present danger every day.

If you want peace, not only in our country, but throughout the world --- get off your duffs, and start chewing on the elephant in the center of the dining room.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Still More for the [Misled] Flag Officers:

By Anna Von Reitz

Well, you are not all misled, just some of you.  And it is to you Misled Fellows that this is addressed.  

Here's the accusation: 

She is again obfuscating the facts about what the founding docs really were/are. The King's founding and the foundations America was built on (follow the money please)  was just a business venture documented in the 1606 First Virginia Charter of claims and was never canceled.   Virginia received three charters, 1606, another in 1609, and the third in 1612. The differences among the three charters lie primarily in the territorial jurisdiction of the COMPANY. He who owns the most land wins. He needed Real Currency so he claimed a share of all the Gold, Silver and Copper found in America by his surveyors and all that would mine for it. These shares would be passed on to his heirs in perpetuity. A good conquest businessman he was to even take care of his future family members. And all at the expense of the Native Americans.   

Here's the answer: 

Of course, the colonization was a business venture.  Of course, the Virginia Company and the New England (Bedford) Company and several others as well were chartered by the King of the Commonwealth and other European Monarchs as well.  So what?  

The private business dealings underlying that progress has nothing whatsoever to do with the public business of our government as of 1776, other than the fact that the private British business interests were preserved by the Definitive Treaty of Paris, 1783, and again, all within the British Territorial Government doing business as "the" United States of America, operating "in our name" under our specific delegation of powers.  

There's nothing exotic about any of this.  The actual entities being referenced are clear throughout all the documents and the nomenclature is both specific and consistent throughout.  Our country and our Federation of States has a Proper Name.  That Proper Name is: The United States of America.  

There is also "the" United States of America, which is the British Territorial Government doing business "in our name" and functioning under our delegated authority.  That government functioned as a business which was later, by 1856, incorporated as "the" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  

And again, so what?  

All that is about British corporations chartered to do private business and make investments in the New World and they were allowed to continue to function in their own Territorial jurisdiction even after The War of Independence.  If you bother to read the first few pages of "You Know Something Is Wrong When....An American Affidavit of Probably Cause" you will find that I years ago described this situation and what everyone got out of it.  

It simply doesn't have anything to do with our actual government and our actual country, The United States of America.  

The King is Arch-Treasurer of "the" United States of America, not The United States of America.  

Get it through your head. 

And though they are very similar names, as any lawyer worth their salt can tell you, "The United States of America" is a very different beastie than "the" United States of America. 

Here's the accusation: 

That's it! Except as a CYA Act the Congress agreed 1789 no one shall take an oath to " the Constitution for the United States of America" because the United States of America was hi$.  

And here's the answer: 

No, again. As I explained yesterday, there are three (3) different Constitutions with three (3) different names.  

The one passed in 1787 is the Original Equity Contract and Federal Constitution. 

The one passed in 1789 is the British Territorial Constitution.  Therefore it makes perfect sense that the 1789 version included the prohibition against taking an oath to the 1787 Constitution, and also, the 1789 Constitution included the Federal Judiciary Act, allowing the Territorial Government to have Sea Jurisdiction Courts. 

Until you get your heads out of your pockets and realize that you are dealing with three different governments all operating on our shores, each providing different governmental services, you will be left making stupid assumptions.  

The Constitution for the united States of America--1787-- (American Service Provider).  

The Constitution of the United States of America - 1789 -- (British Territorial Service Provider). 

The Constitution of the United States - 1790 - (Municipal Service Provider). 

Do you think they created all three of these separate documents and passed them over a period of four (4) years for no reason?  

Whenever you see "the" United States of America or the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, they are talking about the British Territorial entities and the British Territorial United States ---- meaning the Insular States and Possessions. 

Absolutely none of this is talking about our actual country or the States or its civilian government at all. 

Here's the accusation: 

The only thing  I may add is basic contract law is simple the articles were overwritten ie replaced by the new Contract ie Constitution. In international law a sovereign needs another sovereign to co-sign so the articles agreed to the change in terms to be able to conduct commerce internationally which was needed at the time to pay off debts.. Classic case of those with power writing a one-sided contract. 

And here's the answer: 

The Articles of Confederation were never "overwritten", and neither for that matter was anything else.  The entities involved had no such powers.  The States of America ceased to function in the wake of the Civil War.  They were American business entities operated by the actual States and thanks to British betrayal and duplicity, the American States never "reconstructed" these businesses. Until now. 

Here's the accusation: 

Further, the names she uses are not even used on official docs nor internal ones. And all the capacities, characters and conditions she speaks of, not one is explicitly authorized. Sounds like she is actually doing PR that jailed Heather tried floating, as well the one who claimed she was in Illuminati, I and broke free. We did what we did because the Creator asked us to be evil so that you may see good. Remember, SHE came out initially saying it was all fraud. We were born free. 

And here's the answer: 

You are just too ignorant to know what the documents are or what they say. The language and the nomenclature is absolutely consistent in all the Federal Constitutions.  The entities are named throughout the Congressional Records, throughout the Constitutional Conventions, throughout the Federalist Papers and it is all the same and exactly as I have described it.  We have the documents and we have the dates when all these things were decided, named, and put into effect.  We know why it is the way it is, and it all makes sense. 

Our history is consistent.  Our interpretation of the situation and the nomenclature fits.  

And yours doesn't. You're just talking through your hat and making assumptions, which is a dangerous thing to do, when the fate of your country hangs on it.  

Here's the accusation:  

Now she is saying you are subject to a state and what they did was ok - LOL. Claim your political birthright. She attacked Phil and for claiming the proper and recognized birth right. Sounds to me like a well-planned long term psy-op courtesy of the master manipulators. aka Tavistock. They were behind this long term ie late 50s and beyond social transformation. My my my where we have gone in under a generation.

And here's the answer: 

The problem is that because Phil is acting from wrong assumptions, just like you, he didn't claim his "proper and recognized birthright" as an American.  He claimed his birthright as a British Territorial Citizen, instead.  

And he's allowed to do that and so are you, but as I also explained --- it means that you are a British Pauper living on the clemency of the King and standing good for all his debts.  

That's all well and good, if that is what you want to do and mean to do, but if not, it's time to get your heads out of your nether regions and listen up.  You can always admit to making a mistake, but the only mistake you can't correct is the one you won't admit. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Long Overdue

By Anna Von Reitz

This information has been "Flash Banned" by many sources, but it is brief and simple enough to understand. 

The "Vice President" is an office that has always been charged with handling vice operations, as in "Vice Squad".  

In the United States Municipal Government, this initially meant that the Vice-President was responsible for riding herd on the regulation of interstate manufacture, sale, and transport of alcohol, tobacco, and firearms.  These so-called "Sin Taxes" were established initially as the means to fund the operations of the Federal Government.  

It falls primarily under the heading of the Municipal Government because it involves (or is supposed to always involve) business between organized corporations engaged in "interstate commerce", and commerce is the realm of the Municipal Government.  

So from the very first, the Vice President's Office has been concerned with: (1) regulatory activity concerning commercial operations and specifically commerce in controlled substances and commerce in foreign trade; and (2) enforcement activities related to sin taxes, trade in controlled substances, and "vice".  

Unfortunately, when the wrong people get into this Office, it is easy for things to go sideways and instead of being a comptroller and regulator seeking to promote Public Safety and collection of taxes and tariffs on controlled substances and oversight of commercial transactions with foreign business partners involving commodities subject to tariffs and fees of various kinds----- gross abuses occur, which is precisely what happened with Joe Biden.  

Joe Biden couldn't resist feathering the family nest in a big way.  

While there is no evidence that he, himself, directly received funds from these activities, it is clear that he abused his office to rig deals and peddle influence highly beneficial to his son, Hunter Biden. 

By all accounts, Hunter Biden is a man with a troubled history of drug addiction and instability caused by drug addiction---- but because of his Father's office and deal-making and pressuring of foreign governments, Hunter received improper appointments and contracts. 

In the first incident, Joe Biden got his son, Hunter, appointed to the Board of Ukraine's largest private producer of gas, even though Hunter knew nothing about gas production or the Ukraine and had no experience with either.  This netted $50,000 a month, plus a $3 million backdoor payment laundered through other countries. 

A Ukrainian prosecutor was alerted to the money laundering of the $3 million, and began investigating the gas company and Hunter Biden.  

Joe Biden held up $250 million in aid to the Ukrainian Government for ransom, until the prosecutor was fired and this investigation quashed.   This is a crime.  It's called Obstruction of Justice and Economic Blackmail.  Joe Biden bragged about it afterward.  

Nepotism, influence peddling, coercion, and other lesser crimes are also self-evident.  

A second such intervention by Daddy Biden netted Hunter Biden over $1.5 billion dollars from China ---- that's "billion" with a "b".  

Clearly, this not just some petty one-time dalliance of a morally compromised politician finagling a quid pro quo for his son.  

This is a Vice President of the United States getting involved in vice for vice's sake, participating in vice and criminality for unjust enrichment, and abusing his Office "in our names" to do it 

This, when Biden's actual duty as Vice-President, was to control and combat such corruption,  regulate vice-related substances, and collect sin taxes related to controlled substances and foreign commercial tariffs.   

One wonders what the governments of Ukraine and China can think about our country and about us?  

It is outrageous that Joe Biden abused his Public Trust and Office in this manner, but unfortunately, it has become par for the course in Washington, DC.  This and behavior like it, is the reason that the voters hired President Trump to drain the swamp.  

Obviously, those pigs--- or alligators?---- at the trough in DC, are resisting exposure of their dirty deeds and criminality, and so are trying to magically transform this information into a whole new fictional story line, claiming that President Trump did something improper by inquiring about Biden's activities as Vice-President. 

News for the Beltway: Biden behaved as a criminal while occupying the Office of Vice-President of the United States. 

Biden shouldn't be walking the streets, much less running for President. 

More News for the Beltway: President Trump did nothing wrong.  

Still More News for the Beltway: The Party is Over.  

It also appears that the families of John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi have been involved in similar activities, and there may be Republican Lawmakers who have also engaged in this kind of criminality, too.  It hasn't been investigated until now, "out of respect for Congress".  

Obviously, our respect for Congress and all other elected officials has to be predicated on what Congress does, and influence peddling, economic blackmail, and similar activity don't merit our respect, our trust, nor our tolerance. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 2000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.