Court tosses California's concealed weapons rules

Federal appeals courts strikes down California's concealed weapons permit rules

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- A divided federal appeals court has struck down California's concealed weapons rules, saying they violate the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Read the entire article here:
http://news.yahoo.com/court-tosses-californias-concealed-weapons-200220826.html

Lawmakers plot new strategy for defying gun law

More states are joining the effort to stop abuse of power by the Feds.
Nullification is the issue, and so is the commerce clause abuse of the last few decades, which the Montana Firearms Freedom Act seeks to end.  In the mean time other states are getting on the bandwagon, and the numbers are growing.

http://townhall.com/news/politics-elections/2014/01/12/mo-lawmakers-try-new-way-of-defying-gun-laws-n1777799

Wyoming gets it right on firearms. HB104

Wyoming House Votes YES on Firearms Protection Act, 46-13

In response to current threats from the Federal Government on banning firearms, firearms accessories and ammunition, States are beginning to take action to hold the Federal Government to its constitutional limits under the 2nd Amendment. “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

Wyoming Rep. Kendell Kroeker has sponsored and introduced HB0104. the Firearms Protection Act. Representatives Baker, Burkhart, Jaggi, Miller, Piiparinen, Reeder and Winters and Senators Dockstader and Hicks have co-sponsered this bill.

Today, HB104 passed the full state house by a vote off 46-13.

http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/02/wyoming-house-votes-yes-on-firearms-protection-act-46-13/

Gun Show in Kalispell - I am so disgusted I could spit.

I went to the gun show in Kalispell today, All Day.   I could not believe the disgusting overpricing on everything that even looked like a semi - automatic rifle.

I am really mad about this.  The stupid sheeple are finally waking up and are in full panic mode. They are panic buying every gun, magazine, part, accessory, and all the ammo, and paying ridiculous prices for ALL of it.

They are doing this in the big cities at the gun shows, and in every major gun shop across the country and driving the prices up for all of us who have been paying attention all along. Now, all of a sudden, they are worried about losing their guns. Where were they, when we asked them to help us STOP THE UNLAWFUL GUN GRABBERS with political action that could have made a difference.  Where were they when we told them that Obama and all their henchmen were gun grabbers. Where were they when we asked them to chip in with a little money to stop the illegal usurper from being elected, and when we asked them to help us educate the masses about their jury rights and unlawful, so called "gun laws".  They didn't bother to make any effort to stop this before now?

That makes me very, very angry. They have priced my family and I right out of the market!

I HAVE A RIGHT TO BE MAD AS HELL ABOUT THIS.

My family and I have kept fighting this evil, corrupt government every step of the way since 1967,
We have fought, and spent every spare penny, and homeschooled our kids, and worked ourselves to the bone, to stay out of the way of government. We have warned our friends and neighbors, and everyone we could get to, about what the true law in the United States is, and I even spent 13 days in jail in Billings Montana over the money issue, when the Montana Freemen offered to pay for a statewide radio system as a safety net for patriots, and the FBI and local cops and news media refused to tell the truth about why I was there. In fact they didn't even bother to ask me why I was there. They just made up their own story and put it out there as if it were truth.

I have a right to be mad as hell about this.

Where in God's creation are the local government officials who all took an oath to uphold, defend, and obey the Constitution for the United States of America. I say again, WHERE ARE THEY. Why the silence?
As far as I am concerned they have all breached their oath of office BY BEING SILENT on this gun grabber attempt to make criminals out of law-abiding peaceful people with the stroke of a pen.

Where are you Sheriff of Lincoln County? You are still collecting your paycheck are you not?

I was in the courtroom the day you took your oath Roby.  I have the signatures of 35 of Lincoln Counties' finest patriots who witnessed you taking your oath to the Constitutions of the USA and the State of Montana. Why are you silent?  WHY ARE YOU NOT LEADING to make Lincoln County safe against these government terrorists who are threatening the people with gun confiscation? Why are you not forming a posse, to stop the jack booted, black suited thugs of government while you can still stop them peacefully and without bloodshed.  Make no mistake Roby that by your silence on this issue, you are fostering a situation where people will get desperate. You need to be leading as a peacekeeper, and a peace officer. NOT as a "law enforcement" officer under orders from federal outlaw tyrants!.

If you don't believe that you have the duty to stop federal tyranny, then you don't have the requisite knowledge required by the duty of your station in life. We offered to send you to the meeting of sheriffs where you could have learned how to keep your oath. In fact it would have been an all expenses paid trip, but you didn't take advantage of that.

At least Ray Nixon had the backbone to come to Eureka and say to everyone that he would NOT enforce the Brady bill when it passed. And later he was proved right by the Mack/Printz decision of the Supreme Court that said the federal government does NOT have the right to order the states or the CLEOs to do anything at all.

And how about "We the People"?  How about it Joe Blow citizen?  You pay taxes don't you? Are you getting your monies' worth from your elected officials including your commissioners and sheriff? Are you getting any protection at all against the gun grabbers from the people who keep taking your money who have sworn an oath to the supreme law of the land? Are they taking your money and leaving you high and dry, and leaving it up to patriots like ME to stand up for you?

And now that you are in a panic, and see the gun grabbers coming over the horizon, are you paying way too much for guns in a desperate and selfish attempt to get all you can with the little money you have left because these gun grabbers have bled you dry with their UNLAWFUL taxation (inflation tax) without representation, when in fact you should have been fighting them with your mouth and your pen and your money all along?

Well YOU DESERVE WHAT YOU GET YOU DISGUSTING EXAMPLE OF A SHEEPLE!
If the shoe fits, wear it! You know who you are!

I am thoroughly disgusted, and I have all I can do to say this!

I will forgive you all of this, if you will just do one thing, and DO IT RIGHT NOW!

If you will just repent of this lack of action for your freedom, your family, and your neighbor, and start standing up for freedom, and telling everyone you know about the unlawful tyranny of the elite so called rulers, and start educating your family and friends about how LAWLESS the gun grabbers are, I can forgive you. I can even HELP you by giving you the "ammunition" to expose these outlaws and government terrorists. I CAN AND WILL GIVE YOU FREE OF CHARGE, all the facts, and educational materials, and real laws that you need to wake people up and get them in the fight, BEFORE this comes to blood.

So now what is it going to be people?

What is it going to be Sheriffs?  What is it going to be County Commissioners? Are you going to DO something or not? Are you going to keep your oath or not?

Here is the information:  YOU NO LONGER HAVE ANY EXCUSES.

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/11/what-is-really-law-and-what-is-not-law.html

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html

http://www.paulstramer.net/2013/01/sheriffs-called-out-to-fight-law.html

http://www.paulstramer.net/2013/01/what-nobody-has-been-willing-to-say.html

http://www.paulstramer.net/2013/01/is-dianne-feinstein-terrorist.html

http://juryrights.info/

God WILL hold you responsible for the oath you took. It is unmistakable, and very real. You will be held accountable for all eternity for the duties of your station in life the same as me.
 I hope that before God I am keeping my oath, and I hope that you find the strength to keep yours also.
In fact I will give you every help within my power to keep your oath, and I will stand by your side if you decide you are going to keep it.  So the ball is in your court, so to speak.

http://www.oathkeepers.org 

http://www.sheriffmack.com/

http://www.cspoa.org/

Paul Stramer  KC7MEZ   www.paulstramer.net   800 889 2839

Facts Anti-Gun Advocates Don’t Want You to Know

After last summer’s shooting in Aurora, Colorado and last month’s shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut, anti-gun advocates want you to believe that America is a nation infected with violent crimes and murders.  They want you to believe that we are one, if not the, most violent nation in the world and that we have to rid the nation of guns to solve the problem.

But what are the real facts?

Amidst the Noise released a video on You Tube that provides some very stunning facts about violent crimes in the US and Great Britain that anti-gun advocates don’t want you to know this.

Read more: 
http://godfatherpolitics.com/8900/facts-anti-gun-advocates-dont-want-you-to-know/#ixzz2HY6xraLr

GUN CONTROL DICTATOR STYLE

Mass murderer Adolf Hitler at a dinner talk on April 11, 1942 said:

“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.”

Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.

Read this great article here:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Bradlee/dean100.htm

CONTRAST THE ABOVE TO THIS:

George Washington, our first president, said:

“From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that is good.”

Innocents Betrayed: The History of Gun Control

This video is far more meaningful for the argument about gun control now than when it was made.

If you watch this movie to the end you will finally understand exactly why the founders put the 2nd Amendment in the Constitution FOR the United States.   Over 170 MILLION people have been MURDERED by their own governments just in the 20th Century.

THE REAL TERRORISTS ARE IN GOVERNMENT AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN!

SEND THIS EMAIL TO EVERYONE OVER AND OVER UNTIL YOU ARE GETTING IT BACK A HUNDRED TIMES EVERY DAY!

"Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat it." - George Santayana Video (about 58 mins): Innocents Betrayed: The History of Gun Control http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/nwo/innocents-betrayed-the-history-of-gun-control.html - Alexandra P.S. Please share Forbidden Knowledge TV e-mails and videos with your friends and colleagues. That's how we grow. Thanks.

If you think this blog is tough, you haven't seen anything yet!

Read the reaction to the gun grabbers going on around the internet NOW!

http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2013/01/2013-resist-or-disarm-start-deciding.html

"At first glance it appears to be lunacy of the highest order—and yet—here we are on the cusp of violence to defend something the political left, an authoritarian cabal itself, cannot abide, AT ALL: personal freedom, individual freedom. . .

And now they intend to disarm us.

Look. There is so much pent-up anger in America today that if this argument over gun control ever gets beyond the talking stage it is reasonable to believe there will be violence on a scale not seen since the 1860’s in this country."

Is Dianne Feinstein a terrorist?

What do terrorists do?
Don't they threaten VIOLENCE to get what they want?

What will the end result be if Dianne Feinstein's gun ban bill makes it through congress and is signed by Obama?  Won't the jack booted, black suited thugs from government try to collect the guns?
Will that not involve violence?

I believe, like many other Americans, that it will involve much bloodshed.

So isn't Dianne Feinstein TERRORIZING millions of totally law abiding peace loving Americans with violence for doing absolutely NOTHING WRONG?

Terrorists in government throughout history have always tried to disarm the general population (that they consider as their slaves) with some phony so called "law" before they go around killing their opposition who refuse to lay down their arms and give up their freedom.

In fact governments have killed more people this way in the last century than have died from any other cause except natural causes. It's the number one killer. MILLIONS of people have died over so called "gun control" laws. Hitler did it. Stalin did it. Mao did it. Pol Pot did it, and many many more. It was done in country after country and was always followed by genocide and murder on a diabolic scale.

Knowing all that history comes with responsibility, doesn't it?  Shouldn't Dianne Feinstein be arrested, as a designated terrorist under the NDAA for terrorizing over ONE HUNDRED MILLION law abiding American people who just want to be left alone to raise their families, make a living and live in peace, with the protection of their only means of defense against terrorism;  their lawfully owned firearms?

What else do terrorists do to get what they want?

They lie like the devil himself to the public!

They are saying that collecting the guns, especially those horrible "assault weapons" will make our streets safer.  THAT IS A BIG LIE.  Statistics from many countries prove that once guns are rounded up, the next thing that gets rounded up are the freedom loving people who were totally law abiding until the terrorists passed their so called "laws" outlawing guns.

Who are the real outlaws?

The Constitution for the United States IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THIS LAND!  That makes the gun grabbers THE REAL OUTLAWS.
We must stand on the law, and we must stand for law and order. 
Yes we have the absolute right, according to the natural law put into spin by our Creator, to self defense, even if that includes defying unlawful "government goons" with force if necessary. BUT WE ARE NOT THE OUTLAWS in that case, because their whole fraudulent scheme operates on the premise that they have the right to legislate away the US Constitution, and THAT IS FRAUD, deception, threat, duress, coercion, and intimidation, and IT IS TOTALLY UNLAWFUL regardless of what they write on a piece of paper and claim is law for us to follow.

If the gun grabbers were not outlaws, they would be trying to promote a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT rescinding the 2nd Amendment. But no, they already know that it would never work. So instead they buy the DHS over 1.4 BILLION cartridges and purport to pass some "law" that outlaws guns.

I challenge anyone to prove otherwise.  Even if you come with the facts surrounding the United States Corporation, and the tricks they have done to fraudulently get us to go along with their schemes in the past, it does NOT apply to this issue. This has NOTHING to do with any UCC, or contract. This has to do ONLY with GOD'S LAW, and the laws of nature surrounding self defense, safety and freedom from tyranny.
There IS NO HIGHER LAW than God's positive divine law, and the laws of nature He governs the universe by.

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/11/what-is-really-law-and-what-is-not-law.html

Who are the real terrorists?

Ask yourself this question?
What is the best way to stop a terrorist?  Isn't it to catch them and charge them with their crimes?
It's not too late to do that yet, but if this gets much further down the road, then what will be the only solution?

I can not remember in my lifetime a worse terrorist threat than gun grabbers terrorizing one hundred million people with the loss of their hard earned freedom, their property, and their very lives, by threatening to take away their only means of self defense against tyrannical government terror?

The real terrorists are in government and always have been!

Draw your own conclusions.

Gun groups to Congress: Members won't register!

Congressional scheme 'will make felons of otherwise law-abiding citizens'

Dianne Feinstein called a hypocrite among other things.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/gun-groups-to-congress-members-wont-register/

Watch the videos at the link above.
Many thousands of people around the country have already made up their minds and have drawn their line in the sand. They will NOT register, or turn in their guns under any circumstances. 
They know that all gun control so called "laws" are null and void because they abrogate the US Constitution.

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html

They also know that gun control laws not only make the world much more dangerous for law abiding people, but that tyrannical governments have killed more people in the last century than ANY OTHER CAUSE OF DEATH!

They are taking their own safety and well being seriously, and the statistics back them up.

Every time the illegitimate government creates a new gun free zone, that is where the criminals gather to perpetrate their crimes.

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/ban-gun-grabbers-and-their-gun-free.html

Then there is the marine that says NO WAY are you taking my guns:
This is where we all need to be.

Senator Dianne Feinstein,
I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government's right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma'am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.
I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.

I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.

I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.

We, the people, deserve better than you.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012

 joshdb50 was a Marine and was deployed to Afghanistan between the years of 2004 through 2005. Although he is no longer in the military he acknowledges that he owns gun. He says he does not believe the government needs to what guns he owns because he believes registration would lead to confiscation. He says the laws that are in place for gun control are plenty, and adding more laws will remove a means of defense for people. 'I own the guns I own because I acknowledge mankind's shortcomings instead of pretending like they don't exist. There are evil men in this world and there just may be a time when I need to do the unthinkable to protect me or my family,' he said. 

- Jareen, CNN iReport producer

We need to take the stand that if they actually come out and physically try to take the guns that the results will be so horrific and deadly for them, that nobody will even consider trying.

Over 2 million guns were sold JUST IN DECEMBER of 2012 in this country. That tells me that millions of people have already made that choice. There are estimated to be over 100 million firearms owners now in the USA and something just over 300 millions guns in their lawful possession.

My question is this.  If the elite American military can't win a war in Afghanistan in 11 years against a rag tag militia of AK47 toting rag heads, and the Russians couldn't win against that same rag tag army in 10 years of war, what makes the worlds' elite think they can send even a million of their cannon fodder troops into America and win against 100 MILLION WELL ARMED AMERICANS WITH OVER 300 MILLION GUNS?

Gun Control and Genocide.

You can't have Genocide without first having Gun Control!

Gary North has written a very powerful and detailed article about Genocide as a result of the lack of the ability of a people to fight back.

You need to read this and print it to give to your sheriff and anyone who advocates gun bans.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north367.html

"There is a reason why governments are committed to disarming their citizens. They want to maintain the monopoly of violence, no matter what. The idea of an armed citizenry is anathema to most politicians. After all, what's a monopoly for, if not to be used?"

So Wayne LaPierre wants a new government police force to police the schools.

 BIG MISTAKE!!!!!!!!!!

Is the answer to everything more government?  What makes him think the guard in uniform won't be the firstone to die?

And then who is left to protect the kids? The uniform just makes it easier for the criminal to identify, target and take out the persons most likely to offer resistance to their intended crimes.

If anyone in the country should know that more government doesn't work it should be the NRA.

The government had Dianne Feinsteine's assault weapons "law" on the books in the 90s and the Columbine shooting still happened. The ban did absolutely nothing to stop it, and La Pierre knows that.  Banning weapons in certain places just creates FREE KILLING ZONES FOR THE CRAZY PEOPLE, AND FOR GOVERNMENT HIT SQUADS.

Mr. La Pierre, you said the mental health system has totally collapsed. What do you suggest to fix that? Would you give that to government also?  Will you let failed "mental health professionals" decide who is sane and who is not?  Would you now let government mental health people getting paid by our tax money decide who can have guns and who can't?

WHAT WOULD MAKE US BELIEVE that these people wouldn't tend to try to justify their own paycheck like everyone else in government, by putting lots of people on the unworthy list that don't belong there? What makes you think that veterans and shooting enthusiasts wouldn't be put on the list or committed for mental health reasons, to remove opposition to the gun grabbers.

What government agency do you know of that wouldn't use this to remove their opposition? What government agency do you know of that operates using pure and moral or even lawful intent?

After all, the jails are full, so the people that run them can keep the per diem pay coming. Look at the result of the so called drug war.

The jails are full of people who either got caught with a half ounce of marijuana, or had evidence planted by crooked cops so they could confiscate their stuff. Police departments are auctioning off all kinds of stuff they confiscated and keeping the money to finance more firepower and military style equipment so they can do even more raiding. It's a vicious cycle of plunder under the color of "law".

It's so bad now that there are over 2 MILLION people behind bars in this country that we have to support with our tax dollars.

The jails and the courts and cops that keep them full are now a huge GROWTH INDUSTRY worth billions upon billions of dollars per year.

So do you want, now, to make the mental hospitals a GROWTH INDUSTRY the same as the prison system? Really?

IS THAT YOUR SOLUTION? Come on, get real. You can do a lot better than that!

Is this what you call compromise;  giving up something that involves our rights, to get what might not even make a little more safety?  

The dictionary definition of compromise is:

"...settlement of differences by arbitration or by consent reached by mutual concessions".

There can be NO concession, or infringement on gun rights, in the same way that there can be NO concession on your absolute right to defend yourself and your neighbor against a threat to your life and well-being by someone using lethal force.

Read this article on what is really the law about guns:  http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html

The NRA is famous for this compromising of our absolute rights. 

PROHIBITED PLACES LAWS make absolutely no sense whatsoever.

An example right here in Montana is the so called law that prohibits a lawfully carrying person, even a concealed carry permit holder, from carrying his weapon in a cafe that serves beer and wine. 

In the first place, I have never seen any person in the cafes that I eat in ever get rowdy from too much to drink.

Second, if someone did, and I needed my gun to protect myself, it would be out in the car. A fat lot of good that would do me.

If I am eating and not consuming alcohol, the stupid so called "law" prevents me from defending myself and my family.

Third, there is no reason to believe that a concealed carry permit holder who has kept his record clean enough to hold that permit, is going to leave all that effort and common sense behind when he/she goes in that cafe. Ask the lady that testified before congress who watched her parents get shot and killed by the crazy gunman that crashed his vehicle through the front window of a fast food place in Texas and started shooting people. Her gun was in the car outside because the stupid prohibited places "law" said she couldn't have it in the cafe and like most "law abiding" people she left HER COMMON SENSE at the door in an attempt to obey a bad "law".  Do you really think it was a law and that she should have followed it? Do you really think she would do that same thing again, regardless of what the so called "law" says?

Then there is the federal so called "law" that stops even concealed permit holders from carrying in a  post office. They even want you to not have it in your car in the parking lot.

What absolute stupidity!   So you are in the precious metals business.  Your product is valuable. Very valuable. A little box that weighs in at 37 pounds, and measures about 12" X 8" X 5" can be worth over $20,000.  So you come to the post office to pick up a shipment that is shipped via registered mail, which packages always by postal regulations have to be kept in a safe when not being delivered, and the so called "law" makes it so you can't carry even a concealed handgun to protect yourself from a possible robbery.

Not only can you not carry in the building, but they don't even want your gun in the parking lot, so now you are forced to park OFF THE POSTAL PROPERTY, which requires you to carry that box of silver much farther WITHOUT YOUR GUN.  How absolutely insane is that?  Who should have their head examined now? Yes, the people that wrote that insane so called "law". Do you really think  that is a law?

Take a look at that link again:  http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html

Then let's go to the bank with about $80,000 in cash to buy a cashiers check to pay for that precious metal.  At least there is a little running room on this one. While that so called "law" is supposed to prevent a concealed carry permit holder from carrying concealed in the bank, it lets you carry in the open. So now your gun is right there on your hip for everyone in the bank to see.

So you come in the bank with a large amount of cash to deposit in  your account so you can get a cashiers check to send to the mint in payment for an order for one of your customers, and one of the tellers, perhaps a new one that doesn't know you, pushes the silent alarm button and all hell breaks lose.  Wouldn't it have been better to carry that gun concealed like you can do lawfully almost anywhere else, and not upset the banks' help or their customers, and yet you would still be protected from a possible robbery or assault?  Again, who wrote such an insane law?  Maybe they should have their head examined by that government goon mental health professional?

So now we come back to the school, or the theatre, where most of these crimes seem to be taking place.

In 1990 the government purported to put a "law" on the books called "The gun free school zones act of 1990".  In 1995 the Supreme Court blew it out of the water.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-Free_School_Zones_Act_of_1990

Then the infamous Janet Reno, made some changes that were "adopted and widely concealed" to get around the Supreme Court's decision, and today all the school authorities believe that one can not have a gun within 1000 feet of school property without a concealed carry permit.  This change has yet to be challenged in the Supreme Court.

In any case what this so called "law" did was make it possible for criminals to come to a school with the reasonable assumption that there would be no armed intervention while they were committing their crimes. The same result applies to a theater who's owner opts to prohibit any guns in their building. They create a "gun free zone" translation "law free zone" where law and order goes out the window.

The real solution that will work.

In the case of a school, the administrative staff, those that are willing, should get the proper training at some kind of professional firearms training facility like Front Sight in Pahrump Nevada (www.frontsight.com) and they should all carry concealed at the school during school hours. Right now they can do that if they have a concealed carry permit. They don't have to spend money to pass any new "law" under current interpretation. If the school wants to hire an armed guard, that person or persons should also do so with a concealed weapon and the only requirement would be that the guard has a concealed carry permit, but they also should get that proper training.  That way the prospective shooter would not know who was armed.

Then, and this is the big one, the school should post signs and advertise to the effect that any lethal force will be met with more than equal lethal force.

This also applies even better at the theater.  The theater should advertise first for people who have a concealed carry permit to come and be interviewed to receive some free tickets during the year, in return for carrying concealed while they are in the theater. The theater should insist that the perspective free ticket user should also have the proper training at a proper facility as mentioned above. Then the theater can advertise that there will be maybe a hundred people allowed to carry concealed in their theater, and that nobody will know who they are and when they will be using one of their tickets to attend a free movie. The theater can also say something to the effect that their buildings are not a gun free zone, but a crime free zone.

I can hear gun control people screaming "bloody murder" at me right now.  Those that do, ask yourself just one question.

Why do these whacos pick schools and theaters in the first place??? It's because of the stupid gun zone "laws", dummy! Duh!

Don't believe it???  Read this:  http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd565.htm

And finally, why am I using quotes around the word "laws" so much? Again:

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html

And here are more facts:

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/the-gun-grabbers-invented-term-assault.html

http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/crazy-shootings-dont-believe-media.html
And from Ron Paul:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/ron-paul-slams-nra-proposal-for-armed-guards-in-schools-govt-security-just-another-kind-of-violence/

Paul Stramer  

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

OBAMA’S HIDDEN AGENDA: They Are Coming For Your Guns

RIGHTING "WRONGS" BASED ON WRONG INTERPRETATIONS OF "RIGHTS"

By Larry Pratt

November 23, 2010
NewsWithViews.com

Socialists, from President Obama on down, look at the government as the creator and administrator of rights. That is why even some on the left liked the Heller and the McDonald decisions which overturned gun bans in Washington, DC and Chicago.


Don’t get me wrong, I’m ecstatic that the Supreme Court ruled against these the gun bans in these two cities. And I’d rather be in our shoes today than in the Brady Campaign’s -- as they saw their arguments slapped down harshly by the Court.

So why then would some big-government types like these two decisions -- especially the McDonald case out of Chicago?

Read the whole article here: http://www.newswithviews.com/Pratt/larry114.htm

I agree but will add some comments.

While the whole judicial system goes by what was written in the so called 14th amendment, which was not really so much about giving status to former slaves as it was about enslaving all the rest of us, are we sure it was even really ratified or passed properly?

Read the following articles for background:

http://www.paulstramer.net/2010/06/mcdonald-v-chicago-great.html

http://www.paulstramer.net/2010/03/red-amendment-how-your-freedom-was.html

http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/10/coverup-of-what-montana-freemen.html

Paul Stramer
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice (UCC 1-308), on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2010 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Courage, Liberty, Guns and Weed

It's about States Rights, Individual Rights, and the Supreme Law of the land, The Constitution for the United States. Do we have a rule of law or not? Or do we have a rule of men, making the rules as they go without consent of the people?

ALERT!!!! Possible False Flag APRIL 19th, Million Man March Massacre

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2010/3714assass_plot_vs_obama.html

The 2nd Amendment Today.

Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership video.



It is your right to own a firearm to hunt, sport, defend against a government that gets out of hand, and to protect your self and your family.

The second amendment is NOT about hunting or sports shooting.

Why Switzerland Has The Lowest Crime Rate In The World

Uploaded to youtube by crutely2 on November 19th 2009



When thinking about the mass extermination camps of a holocaust think..

The key to freedom is to be able to have the ability to defend yourself &, if you dont have the tools to do that, then youre going to be at the mercy of whomever wants to put you away.

Guns are deeply rooted within Swiss culture - but the gun crime rate is so low that statistics are not even kept.

The country has a population of six million, but there are estimated to be at least two million publicly-owned firearms, including about 600,000 automatic rifles and 500,000 pistols.

This is in a very large part due to Switzerland's unique system of national defence, developed over the centuries.

Instead of a standing, full-time army, the country requires every man to undergo some form of military training for a few days or weeks a year throughout most of their lives.

Between the ages of 21 and 32 men serve as frontline troops. They are given an M-57 assault rifle and 24 rounds of ammunition which they are required to keep at home.

Once discharged, men serve in the Swiss equivalent of the US National Guard, but still have to train occasionally and are given bolt rifles. Women do not have to own firearms, but are encouraged to.

See the video on YouTube here:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nf1OgV449g

Whatever you do, DON'T GIVE UP YOUR GUNS!

We received these comments and the video by email this morning. --------

Here's a great video on gun control. This people gave up and then cried about it. Look at all these gutless men who, had they stood together, may have stopped what happened. They did regret not standing when they had a chance. Will this be our fate too? See any parallels between the bully boys of Europe on gun control and the fear instilled in the majority of people living in Lincoln County? A corrupt minority is controlling an honest majority because the majority is allowing it..

Thank our Creator for ladies like you, and the others in Lincoln County Watch, who do have courage. Where would the county be without people like you.


This will happen in Amerika if we don't take a stand against gun control!



If your guns go away, so does your freedom!

England's increasingly repressive firearms laws often are praised by those who would restrict the American right to arms, so it is important to realize that those firearms laws, which now prohibit the private possession of handguns, rest heavily on one foundation--the British gun owner licensing system. The right to keep and bear arms had been alive in England for eight centuries when Parliament enacted the Pistols Act of 1903. The Act, which prohibited the sale of pistols to minors and felons, also dictated that pistols could be sold only to those who possessed a gun license. Since the license could be obtained at a post office with only the payment of a fee, and since no license was required to keep a pistol solely in the home, there was no opposition. But within a few short years, the licensing system had moved from the post office to the police station. Suddenly, Britons who wanted to own handguns--or rifles--had to prove they had "good reason" for receiving a police permit. Shotguns were considered "sporting" and were exempted from licensing requirements until 1967.


Anti-gun lobbyists in the United States have called for a "needs-based licensing" system and some politicians have lined up to do their bidding.

Is licensing gun owners a good idea? After all, "we license people to drive cars don't we?" If requiring gun owners to obtain a government license seems like a harmless idea to you, you may want to know about "Firearms Form 101." That's the "Application For A Firearms Certificate" that must be filled out by Britons in order to purchase a rifle or muzzleloading handgun. A separate form is required for a "shotgun certificate."

Section 27 of the Firearms Act of 1968 (as amended by the 1997 Act) requires a chief officer of the Police Firearms Licensing Department to be satisfied that the applicant is "fit to be entrusted with a firearm." (Emphasis added) As the applicant, you must provide: * Your home address for the last three years. * Your occupation and business address. * Information about previous convictions, including traffic violations. * Information about any history of Epilepsy. * Information about past treatment for drug use, depression or nervous disorders. * The name of your doctor, and permission for the police to search your medical records to obtain "factual details" about your medical history. * A list of the firearms you already own, including caliber, type, maker's name and serial number. * A list of the ammunition you already own, including caliber and quantity. * A list of the firearms you wish to purchase, stating the reason for wanting to purchase them and where you plan on shooting or hunting with them. * A list of the maximum amount of ammunition you wish to possess at any one time, by caliber. * A list of the maximum amount of ammunition you plan to purchase at any one time, by caliber. * An address where the guns will be stored, for possible future inspection. * Information about whether you have previously held a firearms certificate, or a shotgun certificate. * A letter signed by the secretary of your shooting club or each landowner where you plan to hunt attesting to the fact that you have permission to shoot at those locations. * Four passport size photos of yourself. * A fee of L56 (approximately $90).

As an applicant, you must also designate two "referees" who will fill out a reference form regarding your character. This form will never be shown to you even though it weighs heavily in the final decision to approve or deny the application. The "referees" must: * Have known you for at least the last two years. * Not be a member of your family, a firearms dealer, a police officer or a police employee. * Be of "good character." * Sign the application form declaring that it has been answered truthfully. * Sign and date the back of one of your passport photos attesting that it is an accurate representation of you at that time. * Explain in what capacity they have known you. * Indicate if they are members of a shooting club, and if so their license number and role in the club. * Provide their "opinion as to the applicant's suitability to possess firearms." * Provide information on your personal history, including any history of emotional problems, mental or physical disabilities and explain how knowledge of the information was gained. * Explain any difficulties you have with members of your family which "may give cause for concern given that a firearm or ammunition may be available in the household." * Explain their knowledge of your experience with firearms. * Explain their knowledge of your attitude toward firearms. * Be subjected to a background check and allow personal information to be held on a police computer.

****************************

In Amerika, Judges are already using orders of protection to deny gun ownership to perfectly law abiding people who have never been violent, on the say so of others without proof of any wrongdoing whatsoever, and as a political weapon against their political opposition. Sheriffs are denying concealed carry permits on the basis of orders of protection by judges on the same basis without any proof of any wrongdoing. These so called "justice" courts are not a court of record. The JPs seem to think an order of protection is the solution to everything. They seem to think they can slap an order of protection on anyone without requiring the accusing party to prove anything being alleged. The accusing party usually enjoys the "protection" of the court without being required to submit any evidence to obtain the order of protection. The accused party is usually not allowed to bring witnesses in the court room for hearings on these matters. Evidence in favor of the accused is ignored by judges and orders of protection are granted on the say so of the accusing party alone.
Judges who make these kinds of decisions need to be thrown out of office in the next election.
People who believe in the rule of law, and the maxim of "innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" need to be elected to take their place. The Grand Jury needs to be re-established on a permanent basis to investigate corruption in government, especially in the Judicial branch.
DO NOT GIVE UP YOUR GUNS.

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Gun control in DC? How about in Iraq?

An interesting letter in the Australian Shooter Magazine this week, which I quote:

"If you consider that there has been an average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq theatre of operations during the past 22 months, and a total of 2112 deaths, that gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000 soldiers.

"The firearm death rate in Washington , DC is 80.6 per 100,000 for the same period.
That means you are about 25 percent more likely to be shot and killed in the U.S. capital, which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the U.S., than you are in Iraq."

Conclusion:

The U.S. should pull out of Washington .