Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.


Showing posts with label constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label constitution. Show all posts

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Ryan Bundy In Paradise Montana Jan.23rd 2018





Either we have a Constitution or we don't. What do you say?

Found here: https://youtu.be/kNHwbfzuzQg 

and here: https://youtu.be/OdVE4d4Ogxo


Sunday, April 9, 2017

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 --- Reply to Arnie Rosner


By Anna Von Reitz

Stop putting words in my mouth!  I never said there was no Constitution.  The original one is still in effect---so long as there are any actual American nationals and State Citizens willing to hold the rats accountable. 

Read Article I, Section 8, Clause 17.    It grants Congress the plenary government of the District of Columbia.  So they created the Territorial Government of the United States, and following the Insular Tariff Cases of 1900-1904, they created the Territorial States of States. 

Within the District of Columbia also exists the Municipality of Washington, DC---- which the Congress also enjoys plenary control of.  So they created the Municipal Government of the United States, too. 

And each of these has "citizens"---- Territorial Citizens and Municipal citizens. 

We are not naturally citizens of anything.

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

The Constitution


By Anna Von Reitz

There are a number of questions that must be asked--- and answered--- by each one of us.  Before asking the first and most fundamental question and not inviting anyone to blurt out any answers at this point, I want to make my own position clear.
I do not now and have never advocated any act of violence, insurrection, or treason against the Constitution.
I view the actual Constitution as a flawed contract, but a contract that provides us with protections and guarantees we would not have otherwise.  Those protections and guarantees are supremely valuable once we place ourselves in a position wherein we can exercise them.
So let’s begin with what the actual Constitution is--- and let’s make it clear that when I say “The” Constitution or use the singular form of the word, I am talking about the real American deal ---and when I use the plural form of the word, I am talking about constitutions in general as a class of legal instruments.  
All constitutions, then, are debt agreements--- and so is ours.

Sunday, May 29, 2016

The Destruction of the constitution


by Anna Von Reitz

RE: Question about Federal Districts and claims that a federal military junta took over the Republic and the states during the Whiskey Rebellion. 

As part of the settlement following the Revolutionary War, King George III was given control of American affairs in international commerce (not trade--commerce) on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways.  

The actual Constitution further refined the details.  

The federal government was given control of certain activities and functions, including the regulation of certain "controlled substances"-----  firearms, tobacco, and fireworks--- as a source of income and to provide for a uniform policy regarding these potentially dangerous substances.  The creation of the Federal Districts overlying the borders of the states marked the creation of administrative units to perform this function. 

Monday, May 2, 2016

A Very Critical Point to Understand --- Unanswered Letters 7 -- Reply for Charles


by Anna Von Reitz

Of all the misconceptions and misinformation that has continued to cripple American efforts to self-govern and restore their proper political status and nation this is perhaps The Biggie:  the idea that The Constitution (or any other constitution) applies to us, the living people.

The only mention of us in The Constitution is in the Preamble, which is a Trust Indenture obligating the "federal government" however construed to act as our Trustee and to defend and protect us and our national trust assets.  Two years later this was made more explicit by the Bill of Rights which enumerated some of our trust assets to be protected.

Our Natural and Unalienable Rights which include free speech, free assembly and the others listed by the Bill of Rights are MATERIAL assets more precious than gold, and the entire Federal Entity created by The Constitution agreement is absolutely bound by it to protect those assets.

And that's it.  We don't live under The Constitution.  They do. 

We are not bound by The Constitution.  They are.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

In Regard to "Burning Question" Below:

Since the Constitution was based in Common Law, if you abolished the Common Law wouldn't that extinguish the Federal Government too?

by Anna Von Reitz

The problem is the US Government, not the Federal Government. Two different animals entirely. Any attack against the Common Law or any part of the Law of the Land is an attack against the Republic. Hasn't anyone been listening to date? US Government is the problem. US Government = Law of the Sea = Sea Jurisdiction. Federal Government = Law of the Land (Constitution) = Land Jurisdiction.
Is that how they finished the corporate setup and dissolved government?
Nobody "dissolved" our government. The various units of government either stupidly or with malice aforethought incorporated. Any time you incorporate anything it goes from the jurisdiction of the land to the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea. It removes from the Law of the Land and the guarantees of the Constitution to the Law of the Sea and the Dog-Eat-Dog of maritime and admirality law.
Not sure they could do that lawfully since the foundation of our laws came from Common Law.
The problem can be swiftly addressed in one of three ways:
(1) Bring enough pressure to bear to force the existing incorporated "Counties" and "States" to dissolve their corporations and function naturally as unincorporated business entities again; (2) Do an end-run around the existing incorporated "Counties" and "States" by organizing the landowners in each county and then each state as unincorporated body politics and electing parallel offices designated to operate in the land jurisdiction, as in "Sheriff on the Land" or "Judge on the Land" so that there can be no more confusion or obfuscation.
The offices of the land jurisdiction are all Public Offices that have been "vacant". The offices of the sea jurisdiction are all "similarly named" private corporate offices that have been used to mimmick the public offices---- allowing those in these private corporate offices to improperly wield the powers of public office without the responsibility of public office and also allowing them to abuse what merely appears to be a public office for their private gain.
The third option is to start over with a huge public discussion, a full disclosure of the political status options, and potentially an end to all separation of the land and sea jurisdictions owed to this country.
---------------------------------------
See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Was The Fix In From The Beginning?

Read this thought provoking article from Eric Peters.

I threw the Constitution in the woods years ago, when I became aware of its true nature as a document empowering government rather than protecting the rights of the people. The historic fact is the Constitution was intended to gut the rights of the people; it was only as an afterthought that the Bill of Rights was tacked on, to placate those who were – rightly, as it turns out – suspicious of what Hamilton & Co. were up to.

http://ericpetersautos.com/2014/06/13/fix/

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

How fraudulent contracts have brought American down.

----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Baker 
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 6:17 AM
Subject: Elkhart Sheriff Upholds Constitution

A few week ago Elkhart Sheriff Rogers appeared at a public meeting in South Bend, Indiana along with our Congresswoman Jackie Walorski and stated that he would not enforce any gun confiscation laws.  That statement brought forth a lot of negative comments in the People's Forum of the Elkhart Truth newspaper along would some very good articles by supporters of his position.  The absolute ignorance of many of the negative comments prompted me to write a letter to the People's Forum and it was printed June 16, 2013.
My article is printed below. Bill
    
Over the past month there have been a number of views express in the People's Forum both pro and con about Sheriff Rogers defending the US Constitution by refusing to enforce clearly unconstitutional gun laws.  I am really disturbed by the absolute ignorance displayed by the number of opinions that oppose Sheriff's position.
The biggest concern of our founding fathers was an all powerful federal government.  That's why the 2nd and 14th Amendments were added to the constitution.  They are there to protect the rights of the people. Today the federal government is becoming exactly what the founding fathers feared.
The 2nd amendment clearly states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.  What part of the word infringed do these critics not understand.  Look up infringed in the dictionary.  Governments at all levels have passed laws infringing our rights concerning gun laws.  All of them clearly unconstitutional and would be so declared if it were not for a politiczed and corrupt court system at all levels. 
The 14th Amendment clearly states that "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the citizens of the United States."  This amendment is also violated on a regular basis by our state governments.
We should all be thankful that we have a Sheriff that takes seriously his oath of office.  I wish those other elected officials we elect to office and courts would do the same.
Bill Baker

To: Bill Baker
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: Elkhart Sheriff Upholds Constitution

The problem is that we can not have privileges and immunities at the same time as having rights.
Either we are 14th amendment citizens with privileges and immunities granted by government, OR we are sovereigns who wrote (ordained and established) the
constitution FOR GOVERNMENT TO FOLLOW, which guards our God Given RIGHTS (which are not privileges and immunities granted by government).
Of course the people who wrote against the sheriff don't get that, and probably most of the people who wrote for him don't get it either.
That is why the corrupt courts don't allow constitutional arguments on behalf of 14th amendment citizens. They have no standing, because they gave up their
rights in trade for privileges and immunities, although not voluntarily mostly. The courts argue that once you take part in their system you have volunteered.
But before God, that was all done with fraud, deception, threat, duress, coercion, and intimidation, therefore those so called "contracts" are all null and void,
and entirely without force and effect in God's eyes, and there will definitely be a war over that at some point.  These corrupt leftists, including judges, have their mind made up they will own the whole world, and if they can't own it, they will burn it to the ground.
Paul

From: Paul Lewis  
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: Elkhart Sheriff Upholds Constitution

Well said, my friend. 

Those privileges and immunities are also called "civil rights" which come from Roman civil law. The 14th amendment and the civil rights were created to give the blacks privileges and immunities after the civil war. They were not considered state citizens so they were made U.S. government property citizens.

All the fuss over the years about "equal" civil rights the we hear from government has been not to give the black rights equal to whites but rather to make the rights of the whites equal to those of the blacks; nothing more than privileges and immunities.

Clearly their so-called contracts are fraudulent. I now believe that they are only a portion of the problem; sort of a diversion if you will. They appear to be the problem but underlying them is, I believe, the real crux of the problem. Virtually every document people fill out and complete, to vote, to buy a gun, to buy insurance, to open a bank account, to get a job, etc etc asks a question; Are you a U.S. citizen? 

We voluntarily claim that status and that status is what puts people into their jurisdiction. We voluntarily claim it but it is because we define it geographically while they define it politically. The difference is tremendous and disastrous. 

I am of the opinion, based on my research, that everything goes back to that status; income taxes and all of it. The U.S. was always foreign to the states so claiming U.S. citizenship changes nationality to a foreign jurisdiction rather than the nationality of birth, ie the state of birth. The 14th amendment brought jurisdication of the federal government into the states because U.S. citizens are "subject to their jurisdiction" and are "their" or "its" people.
neo

Neo:
You are correct in your conclusion about our volunteering, but it usually is unknowingly. They have deliberately hidden parts of every contract we "volunteer" into,
and that my friend is fraud, and makes the contract "unilateral".  At law, a unilateral contract is always null and void. Fraudulent contracts that attempt to hide
the provisions of the contract itself are always null and void. But added to that is the fact that most of these so called contracts are pushed on the people with some kind of deception, and usually threat of prosecution or confiscation, which is coercion and intimidation at it's worst.
That additional evil force is justification for almost any retaliation on the part of the people in their own defense, as it usually removes their very means to their own livelihood or their own life itself in some cases.  God is not mocked forever, and he keeps perfect records of every one of these evil actions against the people.
Like I said, at some point there is going to be a war over these issues. Many people now believe that all this was done unlawfully, even though there was the appearance of legislation, because it was done OUTSIDE the supreme law. One great example is the so called "income tax" or 16th amendment, which was never ratified. See http://www.paulstramer.net/2013/05/red-beckman-speaks-4.html
If, in fact it was never a law, how much does THAT one scream to high heaven for vengeance?
Then there is the big lie that Obama was eligible to be a president, and we haven't touched the 17th Amendment, the 14th Amendment (who actually voted for it) and the 13th Amendment.
There is a lot wrong with our country, and one of the worst problems is that many judges KNOW ALL THIS and perpetuate it day after day, and never are any of them ever brought to justice for their crimes. 
My fear is that sooner or later, before we can get a handle on all this, they are going to persecute someone who is not as level headed as you and I, and that person is going to erupt into horrible violence, which will be used by the left to start the martial law war against the people.
I hope and pray we can stop all this with education and a renewal of the principles in Dr. Edwin Vieira's book "The Sword and Sovereignty" before that happens.
But I am slowly losing the conviction that it can be stopped short of a complete and utter collapse, and extreme suffering.
God have Mercy on us.
Paul Stramer  KC7MEZ
Eureka Montana

Get "The Sword and Sovereignty" here:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Sword-Sovereignty-Constitutional-Principles/dp/0967175941/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1371669607&sr=8-1&keywords=the+sword+and+sovereignty

I agree completely. If there was ever truly hope of changing things and resolving the issues peacefully, I suspect they are slipping away from us rapidly now. Back about 3 years ago my suspicions were that it would not be resolved without much bloodshed and loss of life. Like you I have tried to inform and educate all I could because I saw knowledge and truth as our last and best hope of curbing a violent outbreak.

There are too many instances of abusive behavior being exhibited by authorities around the country and, as you say, sooner or later there will one incident too many or in the wrong place at the wrong time. God help us when it comes unglued.
neo

Thursday, May 23, 2013

US Suspends Constitution in 'Permanent' World War on Terror!!!


Two disturbing developments have occurred in the last couple of days that have gone relatively unnoticed compared to the recent IRS, AP, and Benghazi scandals.  ~ Eric Blair - Video
First, the senate is debating an expansion of the already broad powers of the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) so the U.S. can essentially engage any area in the world in the war on terror, including America.
Which brings us to the second development: the Pentagon has recently granted itself police powers on American soil.

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Police told to choose : Gun Control or Constitution

“This is a message to every member of law enforcement and the military,” a sizzling new YouTube video begins. “You know you have a choice to make.”
The video, produced by a man identified on Facebook as Aaron Hawkins, is a challenge to those who enforce America’s laws, warning them the day is coming when gun-control legislation will undermine the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment and police forces will be asked to restrict or even confiscate American citizens’ firearms.


You took an oath to defend the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. The congress, the senate and the executive branch have made themselves into a domestic enemy, and they are going to attempt to use you to help them in their push to eliminate the 2nd amendment.

Read more at

http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/police-told-to-choose-gun-control-or-constitution/

See another video from a police officer here:
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2013/01/14/video-oath-keeper-officer-calls-on-brother-cops-to-refuse-to-enforce-gun-bans-or-registration/

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

What law are you really subject to in America?

From one of our readers.

Obama has taken $8.3 BILLION of taxpayers' money to finance his election campaign.

Another of his MANY direct violations of Law.

The Most Opressive features of Obamacare are designed to not kick in until after the election.... such things as the IRS taking our guns.... Go to link below:

http://thepartyofknow.com/2012/04/23/new-york-post-an-8-billion-trick-toying-with-medicare-to-fix-elex/#more-8861

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Friends -

The time is coming closer every day, when the only common people in America who will have any freedom at all will be those who KNOW that they are IMMUNE to the laws made by this Corrupt Corporation that fraudulently claims to be our government - the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. They are only a color-of-law government (look it up!).

"THEY" are NOT the government, WE are - but even before 1871 when they incorporated, back when they were a legitimate de jure government, they were never our masters. They have always been our servants - that's why they're called "public servants" - they serve US!! WE, the People are the government.

EVERY LAW THEY PASS REQUIRES EACH OF US INDIVIDUALLY TO CONSENT TO IT, BEFORE IT HAS ANY POWER AT ALL OVER US. THAT INCLUDES MARTIAL LAW AND ALL OF THE MILITARY AND POLICE STATE. The only problem remaining is the Big One: No one realizes that they consent "accidentally" when they are ignorant of the Actual Written Law in America.

Let's practice this phrase for judges and cops: "You have no authority because I do not Consent to it, and I do not Recognize you." ("Recognize" is a magic legal word that gives you power over government. TELL THEM you do Not Give them your Recognition!)

If you don't value your own freedom, please at least value your children's and neighbors'. Here are some resources to begin curing ignorance of the law. Please read them!! We must work to reverse decades of fraud, brainwashing and Lies!

The Truth is a Person named Christ Jesus. HE Will Set You Free !

Through our Christian forefathers, HE has given us a nation of WRITTEN LAWS to combat the fraud and greed of public servants - but we have to grasp that law.

http://SovereigntyInternational.info/The%20people%20are%20sovereign.html

1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAVIh7MipX8

2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJZ5_SqZhG8

3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlxqDUdf5Io

4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jNEByNOubI

5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTTan1GAx_Q

6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Rtfhto81rU

7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKqFy9atnXM

The courts have ruled that "*we the people*" are a nation of Kings and Queens and the ONLY authority that is held by any government agent or agency is authority that was *delegated* by "we the people" (temporarily).

One example court case: "Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; ….." Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 US 356, at pg 370;

“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton vs Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, p. 442

Act Now -- soon it may be too late to start!

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.




Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Montana's governor needs to study the Constitution.

There are none so blind as those who would not see!

The classic definition of ignorance is "not knowing what is required by one's station in life".
The classic definition of insanity is "doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result".

People of Montana, are you tired yet of your elected legislators fiercely defending their own ignorance?

People of Montana, are you tired of your elected representatives trying to apply the same old remedies while expecting somehow, a miraculous new and different result?



Read below one very informed analysis of the current "freedom phobia" of some legislators.
From: Elias Alias
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 12:14 AM
Subject: Republican Betrayal

The depth of ignorance regarding what is happening to our beloved America, and by extension what is happening to our beloved Montana, is staggering. I have said often that the elections of 2010 were a Tea Party victory, not a Republican victory. But as I watch how so many RINO Republicans continue to vote with the progressive statists against the array of liberty bills in the current legislative session, I begin to realize that there was no victory at all, or precious little, in the 2010 election in Montana. Maybe a small handful of truly Republican Tea Party candidates managed to get elected, and each of those who remain loyal to the nation's founding principles is indeed a blessing to our State. But obviously some candidates were elected (and more were re-elected) who have no clue about our impending fate as Montanans caught up in the destruction of America.

Read the entire hard hitting article here:
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/republicanbetrayal.htm

Monday, November 29, 2010

Monday, February 8, 2010

The Bill of Rights Simplified

What does their Oath of Office bind office holders and public servants to?

A simple, easy to understand, modern-day translation for politicians, bureaucrats, and other people who just don’t seem to get it.

The Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will worst ensure the beneficent starts of its institution.

Translation: Government by its very nature is evil and stupid and, unless watched like a hawk, will abuse people and violate their rights. So we’re setting down some limitations here.

Article the First… Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Translation: The government shall not:

• Have any opinion whatsoever on any religion, pro or con.

• Limit what anyone has to say – anywhere, at any time, under any circumstances.

• Limit what anyone wants to print – anywhere, at any time, under any circumstances.

• Prevent people from assembling in any place for any reason they want, as long as they’re doing it peacefully.

• Prevent people from addressing government officials to demand correction to grievances and injustices.

Article the Second… A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Translation: Because government by its very nature is evil and stupid, it is prone to violating the principles mentioned here, and therefore individuals may need to shoot it. It would be a clear conflict of interest for the government to decide what arms the citizens are allowed to own. Therefore, the government shall not have any opinion whatsoever about any weapon that anyone owns and/or carries anywhere, at any time, under any circumstances. Please note that this doesn’t have anything to do with hunting.

Article the Third… No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Translation: The government cannot force anyone to ‘Support The Troops.’

Article the Fourth… The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Translation: The government cannot search anyone, or any of their property or belongings, unless it has a damn good reason – in writing – first. This reason, and the scope of the search, must be very specific, because we all know how government loves to push the limits.

Article the Fifth… No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Translation: The government shall not:

• Decide if a person is to be charged with a capital crime, unless that person is serving in the military.

Otherwise, the government must submit its evidence to a grand jury and let THEM decide if anyone is

to be charged.

• Try someone again and again hoping for a conviction. They get one shot, and that’s it.

• Even think about trying to force anyone to confess to anything, ever.

• Imprison anyone without due process.

Article the Sixth… In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

Translation: When the government accuses anyone of anything, assume they’re innocent and make the government prove its case rigorously. The government must present its case publicly, in full view, and put up or shut up immediately. All evidence, witnesses, and charges have to be made available to the accused along with a lawyer to help him defend himself. The accused gets a trial by a jury of his peers in the area where the crime supposedly occurred.

Article the Seventh… In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Translation: In any civil case where the value exceeds $20, the accused has a right to a trial by jury, and the government must accept the jury’s verdict. Again, no do-overs.

Article the Eighth… Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Translation: Since the government is too evil and stupid to be trusted, it should obviously NEVER be allowed to demand excessive bail, impose excessive fines, inflict torture or other cruel and unusual punishments on ANYONE. Period.

Article the Ninth… The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Translation: Just because there are certain rights illustrated here, that doesn’t mean there are no others. Don’t let the government trample these other rights either. Think privacy, free trade, freedom of travel, the right to not be taxed into an early grave… that sort of thing.

Article the Tenth… The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Translation: If it’s not explicitly stated here then it’s not a Federal Government power; it belongs to the States or to the people. The States can restrict the above powers of the Federal Government even further if they think it’s necessary.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Is the Military fed up with treason in government?

This is posted for it's educational content. I do not recommend taking any action on this at this time until the military arm is identified. PS.



This was forwarded to me this morning and it sounds like finally the US military is getting involved in getting control of runaway government and putting it back into the hands of We the People. It's far past time for this to happen.
Everyone in the military took the oath to uphold, defend, and obey the US Constitution and protect it against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC, and it seems some of them take that oath seriously.
I encourage you to listen to this internet broadcast this Sunday with an open mind just so you know the full spectrum of what is going on across this land. I am not saying you should do anything with this except listen.
This will be archived and you can listen by subscription for less than $2 per month.
Listen Sunday night at 8PM EST at  http://republicbroadcasting.org/  or find the archived version after Sunday at the same address.
Paul
-----------------------------------------------
For questions, please send your email to restore.america@hotmail.com

To my friends, fellow patriots and lovers of freedom worldwide,

Some time ago I promised a final remedy to enslavement at the hands of corporations posing as legitimate government. Well, the time has finally arrived. This is the most important email I have ever written and it represents an end, once and for all, at the source, to the swat teams, arrests, foreclosures, garnishments, seizures, tax prosecutions and hardships which result from failing to pray to corporate institutions or exhibit evidence of subject-class citizenship.

This Sunday night at 8 PM on TAKE NO PRISONERS (Republic Broadcasting Network), I will be joined by the leaders of the freedom movement for the high honor of bringing you – without commercial interruption - an end to economic warfare and political terror by March 31, 2010. In two months, we can, and will, be free, with your assistance.

The Restore America Plan is not a patriot scheme. IT WAS PROPOSED TO US BY THE MILITARY MORE THAN A YEAR AGO. Having developed the necessary tools, we are now ready to execute the plan beginning Sunday night.

If you truly desire to restore the posterity and end your problems once and for all, I invite you to tune in Sunday Night, and more importantly, to contact every one on your freedom email list. Sunday night we begin the methodical process of reinhabiting the original de jure institutions (which never ceased to exist) of the free American republics quickly, quietly, efficiently and peacefully, and without the need for re-educating the unconscious public or loud proclamations that are sure to evoke resistance and violence.

Very simply, the Restore America Plan will reverse the wicked deeds of 1933 and 1865 BEHIND THE SCENES, with the same cleverness the bankers used to remove money, law and dignity, and without disturbing the peace. We, the sovereign People, will be in charge as the ONE AND ONLY LAWFUL AUTHORITY ON THE LAND. Not just in name, but in reality.

Even if the plan had not been proposed by the military, the very nature of re-inhabiting the lawful de jure institutions of government is itself the victory we have all been seeking. Actors throughout the United States Federal Corporation understand they must ultimately defer to the de jure authority on the land when properly assembled and credentialed in sufficient number.

And so does the military –which is why they made the offer. The responsibility is enormous – and so are the risks if we fail. THE MILITARY HAS CHARGED US WITH THE HIGH RESPONSIBILITY OF ENDING THE SPIRAL TO WORLD WAR III being orchestrated by the Rulers of Evil. Never have men borne such responsibility. We are the last best hope for mankind. Essentially, we have been asked to provide the military with an alternative to a corporate CEO as their commander, and to re-inhabit all the de jure institutions that have been pre-empted from governance.

And…we…will. Folks, it is time to step-up to the plate. It is time to be part of the solution instead of the list of perpetual victims. Your future and the future of your children are in YOUR hands. A line has been drawn in the sand. If we fail to come together and accept responsibility, there will be no one else to blame. There will be no more excuses. The future IS ours to create. Either we seize the brass ring or slink away into obscurity.

That is what we are bringing you Sunday night on TAKE NO PRISONERS at 8 PM Eastern time. No less than a moment of epochal importance in the history of mankind. That is why the network so graciously dropped commercial messages. All of the details and materials have been planned, worked-out and implemented from first presentation to enforcement. We are ready to close the deal. I hope you will join me and my very special guests for this live commercial-free broadcast.

TAKE NO PRISONERS is carried live every Sunday night at 8 PM EST on FM stations around the nation, on Shoutcast (using the free Shoutcast application on iPhones and other handhelds), and live on the internet at:
http://republicbroadcasting.org/

Wishing you a blessed day and tomorrow.

Sam Kennedy
Host: TAKE NO PRISONERS
Republic Broadcasting network
http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/
The Save America Crusade

FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY - NOT LEGAL ADVICE.
PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS. MOST PROBLEMS ARE SELF-CREATED.

- “28 USC 3002” (definition of the United States as a Federal corporation never taught in civics class; go to paragraph 15) (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00003002----000-.html)

- “27 CFR 72.11” (U.S. Inc. defines all crime as commercial as a result of the fall of the republic when the South walked out of congress in 1861 and the de jure congress, unable to raise a quorum, was replaced by Lincoln with the de facto corporate Congress; and the de jure district court of the United States was replaced by the de facto corporate UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_98/27cfr72_98.html)

- “Executive Order 6102” (government’s confiscation of your family’s gold and wealth under threat of 10 years in prison for failure to comply. As the Order specifies U.S. “persons” (eg. JOHN SMITH and JANE DOE), law enforcement was duped into enforcing against the general public a command that only applied to Federal employees and members of the armed forces.) (http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14611 or http://www.the-privateer.com/1933-gold-confiscation.html)

- “HJR 192” (outlawing of the simple act of “paying with money” as a felony by substituting the lawyer’s parlor trick of “discharging” debts) (http://www.truthsetsusfree.com/HJR192.htm or http://www.nomoredebt.cc/hjr192.html)

- “Congressman Louis McFadden speech” (indictment of the Secretary of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board of Governor’s for treason by the chairman of the House Banking and Currency committee in 1934. In scathing speeches to Congress, McFadden said: “(The Fed) has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government.” This most knowledgeable man on banking also explained in vivid detail the method for recruiting the Federal Reserve to pay our debts as holder of the gold, and which is at the heart of today’s “tax remedies.”) (http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/mcfadden-frb.html or http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/3616/flaherty10.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_T._McFadden)

- “Lewis v. United States 680” (Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned: “…we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA (Federal Tort Claims Act), but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.” Lewis v United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982). In other words, the Fed enjoys no United States immunity from law suit because it is a Federal institution in name only. (http://nesara.org/court_summaries/lewis_v_united_states.htm and http://www.geocities.com/chrisforliberty/lewis.html)

- “Modern Money Mechanics” (The Fed’s concise operational manual showing how money AND INTENTIONAL INFLATION are created from thin air by the Fed and it’s member banks. The manual is very clear as to the power of created inflation to speed the process of confiscating your wealth. The section: “Who Creates Money?” and the final paragraph in “Bank Deposits – How They Expand or Contract” are worth extra attention.) (www.rayservers.com/images/ModernMoneyMechanics.pdf or http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Modern_Money_Mechanics/Introduction )

- “Grace Commission” (Confirmed that virtually ALL taxes actually go to the Federal Reserve Bank to pay interest on the U.S. debt to the banking families that own the International Monetary Fund (IMF): “With two-thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government.” J. Peter Grace, Cover letter, President’s Private Sector Report on Cost Control, January 12, 1984. Peter Grace was considered the Warren Buffett of his time, and the Grace Commission Report received widespread media attention as the gospel of Reagan’s so-called tax system overhaul.) (http://www.freecanadian.net/articles/grace.html or http://www.uhuh.com/taxstuff/gracecom.htm)

- “31 CFR 103.11” (Promissory note is defined as a “monetary instrument:” “(u) Monetary instruments…Monetary instruments include…All negotiable instruments (including personal checks, business checks, official bank checks, cashier's checks, third-party checks, promissory notes (as that term is defined in the Uniform Commercial Code), and money orders) that are either in bearer form, endorsed without restriction, made out to a fictitious payee (for the purposes of Sec. 103.23), or otherwise in such form that title thereto passes upon delivery.”) (http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2008/julqtr/31cfr103.11.htm or http://www.ffiec.gov/bsa_aml_infobase/pages_manual/regulations/31CFR103.htm)

- “NYUCC 3-104” (Promissory note is defined as a “negotiable instrument:” “(1) Any writing to be a negotiable instrument within this Article must (a) be signed by the maker or drawer; and (b) contain an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in money and no other promise, order, obligation or power given by the maker or drawer except as authorized by this Article; and (c) be payable on demand or at a definite time; and (d) be payable to order or to bearer. (2) A writing which complies with the requirements of this section is (a) a "draft" ("bill of exchange") if it is an order; (b) a "check" if it is a draft drawn on a bank and payable on demand; (c) a "certificate of deposit" if it is an acknowledgment by a bank of receipt of money with an engagement to repay it; (d) a "note" if it is a promise other than a certificate of deposit.) (www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-104.html)

- “Senate Report 93-549” (The United States has been under dictatorial control since March 9, 1933. Report of the Special Committee on the Termination of the National Emergency, Senate Report 93-549, War and Emergency Powers Acts, November 19, 1973. “Foreward: Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency…These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of Federal law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal Constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.”) (http://www.scratchinpost.net/barefootbob/war_ep1.html)

- “Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 (1949).” (U.S. regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “It is a well established principle of law that all federal regulation applies only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States unless a contrary intent appears.”)

- “Caha v. US, 152 U.S. 211 (1894)” (U.S. regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “The laws of Congress in respect to those matters [outside of Constitutionally delegated powers] do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.”)

- “U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222.” (U.S. regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “There is a canon of legislative construction which teaches Congress that, unless a contrary intent appears [legislation] is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”)

- “Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901).” (Purportedly decided if the constitution applies to U.S. territories. In actuality, unleashed the great fraud of unlimited statutory power misapplied throughout the continental united States of America. Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan. “…two national governments, one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to…a radical and mischievous change in our system of government will result…We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism…It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of a government outside the supreme law of the land finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence.” In other words, a genuine de jure united States of America congress is always bound to enact laws within the jurisdiction of the constitution. He held tyo the obvious truth that congress does not exist, let alone have powers, outside the constitution. Harlan said, "This nation is under the control of a written constitution, the supreme law of the land and the only source of the powers which our government, or any branch or officer of it, may exert at any time or at any place.")

- Section 802, Patriot Act. (Defining the People as terrorists. Defining terrorism as a maritime event. Excluding private meetings on the land from terrorism: “(5) the term `domestic terrorism' means activities that--(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended-- (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”) (http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Section802.htm)

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

Friday, January 15, 2010

How to Advance Liberty (by Leonard Read) A LEADERSHIP PROBLEM!

FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION 1978
It seems this was made more for today than back then.
This video was made to chart a course to Advance Liberty through education and leadership, which is what is sorely needed right now to counteract the radical socialism that is destroying Freedom in America.

The priniciples contained in this video outline what Lincoln County Watch is all about. The program is working. People are waking up rapidly. Knowledge is power, and the power needs to be back in the hands of educated people to stop the demise of our Freedom. People who once understand freedom and work spreading that knowledge to their neighbors are the real human rights activists.



This organization is still going strong. Here is their website:

http://fee.org/

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Is the Constitution Dead? Did it ever "Create Freedom"?

These provacative questions are at the heart of the problems our country faces today.

A recent series of articles by Tim Baldwin shows what must be done, and why, to restore freedom.
"Those who refuse to learn from history are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana

Read the articles starting at the top here:
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?author=67

Tim Baldwin is an attorney who received his Juris Doctor degree from Cumberland School of Law at Samford University in Birmingham, Alabama. He is a former felony prosecutor for the Florida State Attorney's Office and now owns his own private law practice. He is author of a soon-to-be-published new book, entitled FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE. Tim is also one of America's foremost defenders of State sovereignty.
See his blog here:  http://libertydefenseleague.com/liberty/

Friday, December 11, 2009

Tea Parties Need Teeth. Reviving the Militia of the Several States.

By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
November 17, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

[The following is the full text of an address presented to the National Heritage Center for Constitutional Studies at its 2009 Constitution Day conference.]

The Tenth-Amendment Resolutions from State Legislatures, the Tea Parties, the Town Hall Meetings, and other manifestations of WE THE PEOPLE’S feedupidness with monkey-business as usual in the Disgrace of Columbia—even the massive congregation on the Mall last September—are some of the most enlightening, encouraging, and energizing developments that American patriots have witnessed in a long time. For these events are all premised on the idea: “We don’t want you!”—that WE THE PEOPLE do not want any more, indeed they demand a great deal less, interference in their lives from rogue public officials in the General Government.

These events notwithstanding, the problem remains that too many among WE THE PEOPLE will start but then stop right there, with “We don’t want you!” That is not enough.

The complaint “We don’t want you!” needs to go further, to the resolve, “We won’t have you!” — that WE THE PEOPLE intend to rid themselves of the General Government’s interference.

And to make this resolve effective, WE THE PEOPLE need to design and put into effect remedial action, so that they can say with finality: “We don’t need you!”

The sequence must be—

(i) We don’t NEED you!” which makes it realistic to say:

(ii) We don’t WANT you!” which combined with the ability to make WE THE PEOPLE’S wants effective will lead to the necessary and sufficient action:

(iii) We won’t HAVE you!” and finally will yield the desired result:

(iv) We are RID of you!”

If WE THE PEOPLE have the ability they can give “teeth” to the desire, take the necessary action, and thereby accomplish their goal.

But what will all of this require?

Read the whole article to get the answers here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin201.htm

Read Chuck Baldwin's comments on this article here:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20091211.html

Friday, November 13, 2009

I dare you to watch this all the way through. Deprogram the Matrix!

I guarantee you will have a new paradigm  and will be able to completely think outside the box when you are done.

We just think we are "free men"
We just think we have a Constitution.
We just think we have an "American Dream" available to us.
We just think we have elections.
We just think we have courts.
We just think we have a law.
We just think we own property.
We just think we have freedom of speech.
We just think we have representatives.
We just think we have "constitutional rights".
We just think we have justice.
We just think we have a vote.
It's all a big lie and as long as we believe it and act accordingly we are SLAVES in the Matrix.

Click this link to get your mind deprogrammed, then click the link below to take action.
http://www.deprogram.us/deprogram.php

http://www.pacinlaw.org/home.php

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.