What do terrorists do?
Don't they threaten VIOLENCE to get what they want?
What will the end result be if Dianne Feinstein's gun ban bill makes it through congress and is signed by Obama? Won't the jack booted, black suited thugs from government try to collect the guns?
Will that not involve violence?
I believe, like many other Americans, that it will involve much bloodshed.
So isn't Dianne Feinstein TERRORIZING millions of totally law abiding peace loving Americans with violence for doing absolutely NOTHING WRONG?
Terrorists in government throughout history have always tried to disarm the general population (that they consider as their slaves) with some phony so called "law" before they go around killing their opposition who refuse to lay down their arms and give up their freedom.
In fact governments have killed more people this way in the last century than have died from any other cause except natural causes. It's the number one killer. MILLIONS of people have died over so called "gun control" laws. Hitler did it. Stalin did it. Mao did it. Pol Pot did it, and many many more. It was done in country after country and was always followed by genocide and murder on a diabolic scale.
Knowing all that history comes with responsibility, doesn't it? Shouldn't Dianne Feinstein be arrested, as a designated terrorist under the NDAA for terrorizing over ONE HUNDRED MILLION law abiding American people who just want to be left alone to raise their families, make a living and live in peace, with the protection of their only means of defense against terrorism; their lawfully owned firearms?
What else do terrorists do to get what they want?
They lie like the devil himself to the public!
They are saying that collecting the guns, especially those horrible "assault weapons" will make our streets safer. THAT IS A BIG LIE. Statistics from many countries prove that once guns are rounded up, the next thing that gets rounded up are the freedom loving people who were totally law abiding until the terrorists passed their so called "laws" outlawing guns.
Who are the real outlaws?
The Constitution for the United States IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THIS LAND! That makes the gun grabbers THE REAL OUTLAWS.
We must stand on the law, and we must stand for law and order.
Yes we have the absolute right, according to the natural law put into spin by our Creator, to self defense, even if that includes defying unlawful "government goons" with force if necessary. BUT WE ARE NOT THE OUTLAWS in that case, because their whole fraudulent scheme operates on the premise that they have the right to legislate away the US Constitution, and THAT IS FRAUD, deception, threat, duress, coercion, and intimidation, and IT IS TOTALLY UNLAWFUL regardless of what they write on a piece of paper and claim is law for us to follow.
If the gun grabbers were not outlaws, they would be trying to promote a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT rescinding the 2nd Amendment. But no, they already know that it would never work. So instead they buy the DHS over 1.4 BILLION cartridges and purport to pass some "law" that outlaws guns.
I challenge anyone to prove otherwise. Even if you come with the facts surrounding the United States Corporation, and the tricks they have done to fraudulently get us to go along with their schemes in the past, it does NOT apply to this issue. This has NOTHING to do with any UCC, or contract. This has to do ONLY with GOD'S LAW, and the laws of nature surrounding self defense, safety and freedom from tyranny.
There IS NO HIGHER LAW than God's positive divine law, and the laws of nature He governs the universe by.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/11/what-is-really-law-and-what-is-not-law.html
Who are the real terrorists?
Ask yourself this question?
What is the best way to stop a terrorist? Isn't it to catch them and charge them with their crimes?
It's not too late to do that yet, but if this gets much further down the road, then what will be the only solution?
I can not remember in my lifetime a worse terrorist threat than gun grabbers terrorizing one hundred million people with the loss of their hard earned freedom, their property, and their very lives, by threatening to take away their only means of self defense against tyrannical government terror?
The real terrorists are in government and always have been!
Draw your own conclusions.
Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress
You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.
Saturday, January 5, 2013
San Antonio Theater Shooting
The Media won't tell you about this one!
on December 28, 2012
on December 28, 2012
On Sunday December 16, 2012, 2 days after the CT shooting, a man went to a restaurant in San Antonio to kill his ex-girlfriend. After he shot her, most of the people in the restaurant fled next door to a theater. The gunman followed them and entered the theater so he could shoot more people. He started shooting and people in the theater started running and screaming. It’s like the Aurora, CO theater story plus a restaurant!
Now aren’t you wondering why this isn’t a lead story in the national media along with the school shooting?
There was an off duty county deputy at the theater. SHE pulled out her gun and shot the man 4 times before he had a chance to kill anyone. So since this story makes the point that the best thing to stop a bad person with a gun is a good person with a gun, the media is treating it like it never happened.
Only the local media covered it. The city is giving her a medal next week. Just thought you’d like to know.
See pics and the original article here:
Friday, January 4, 2013
What nobody has been willing to say about the gun grabbers.
Nobody that I know of has said this.
NO PROVISION OF THE US CONSTITUTION can be legislated out of existence without due process of law meaning the Constitutional Amendment process.
Any bill attempting to overturn the 2nd Amendment, or any other part of the Bill of Rights is an overt act of TREASON or at the very least SEDITION.
The minute the bills are in the hopper in congress there should be arrests made of the sponsors of the bills as operations of sedition, inciting the overthrow of the US Constitution, by force of arms, which violates the civil authority of We The People. If you don't buy that think about this. How will the new so called "law" be enforced if not with guns?
These gun grabbers are people who are involved in and perpetrators of SEDITION, against the supreme law of the land, and the peaceful civil order of society.
Paul Stramer
Now read what Chuck Baldwin has to say about gun confiscation:
MY LINE IN THE SAND IS DRAWN HERE!
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin734.htm
Now Chuck, I want you to consider this:
I quote you toward the end of your article where you said this:
"Ladies and gentlemen, whatever the consequences might be, and whatever anyone else does or doesn’t do, I am prepared to become an outlaw over this issue! I don’t know how to say it any plainer: I will not register my firearms, and I will not surrender my firearms. Period. End of story. It’s not just a saying with me: when my guns are outlawed, I will be an outlaw!"
YOU WILL NOT BE THE OUTLAW The Constitution for the United States IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THIS LAND! That make the gun grabbers THE REAL OUTLAWS.
We must stand on the law, and we must stand for law and order. Yes we have the absolute right, according to the natural law put into spin by our Creator, to self defense, even if that includes defying unlawful "government goons" with force if necessary. BUT WE ARE NOT THE OUTLAWS in that case, because their whole fraudulent scheme operates on the premise that they have the right to legislate away the US Constitution, and THAT IS FRAUD, deception, threat, duress, coercion, and intimidation, and IT IS TOTALLY UNLAWFUL regardless of what they write on a piece of paper and claim is law for us to follow.
I challenge anyone to prove otherwise. Even if you come with the facts surrounding the United States Corporation, and the tricks they have done to fraudulently get us to go along with their schemes in the past, it does NOT apply to this issue. This has NOTHING to do with any UCC, or contract. This has to do ONLY with GOD'S LAW, and the laws of nature surrounding self defense, safety and freedom from tyranny.
There IS NO HIGHER LAW than God's positive divine law.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/11/what-is-really-law-and-what-is-not-law.html
NO PROVISION OF THE US CONSTITUTION can be legislated out of existence without due process of law meaning the Constitutional Amendment process.
Any bill attempting to overturn the 2nd Amendment, or any other part of the Bill of Rights is an overt act of TREASON or at the very least SEDITION.
The minute the bills are in the hopper in congress there should be arrests made of the sponsors of the bills as operations of sedition, inciting the overthrow of the US Constitution, by force of arms, which violates the civil authority of We The People. If you don't buy that think about this. How will the new so called "law" be enforced if not with guns?
These gun grabbers are people who are involved in and perpetrators of SEDITION, against the supreme law of the land, and the peaceful civil order of society.
Paul Stramer
Now read what Chuck Baldwin has to say about gun confiscation:
MY LINE IN THE SAND IS DRAWN HERE!
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin734.htm
Now Chuck, I want you to consider this:
I quote you toward the end of your article where you said this:
"Ladies and gentlemen, whatever the consequences might be, and whatever anyone else does or doesn’t do, I am prepared to become an outlaw over this issue! I don’t know how to say it any plainer: I will not register my firearms, and I will not surrender my firearms. Period. End of story. It’s not just a saying with me: when my guns are outlawed, I will be an outlaw!"
YOU WILL NOT BE THE OUTLAW The Constitution for the United States IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THIS LAND! That make the gun grabbers THE REAL OUTLAWS.
We must stand on the law, and we must stand for law and order. Yes we have the absolute right, according to the natural law put into spin by our Creator, to self defense, even if that includes defying unlawful "government goons" with force if necessary. BUT WE ARE NOT THE OUTLAWS in that case, because their whole fraudulent scheme operates on the premise that they have the right to legislate away the US Constitution, and THAT IS FRAUD, deception, threat, duress, coercion, and intimidation, and IT IS TOTALLY UNLAWFUL regardless of what they write on a piece of paper and claim is law for us to follow.
I challenge anyone to prove otherwise. Even if you come with the facts surrounding the United States Corporation, and the tricks they have done to fraudulently get us to go along with their schemes in the past, it does NOT apply to this issue. This has NOTHING to do with any UCC, or contract. This has to do ONLY with GOD'S LAW, and the laws of nature surrounding self defense, safety and freedom from tyranny.
There IS NO HIGHER LAW than God's positive divine law.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/11/what-is-really-law-and-what-is-not-law.html
Definition of Sedition: (Miriam Webster Dictionary)
"Incitement
of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority"
"Crime
of creating a revolt, disturbance, or violence against lawful civil authority
with the intent to cause its overthrow or destruction."
In
the United States We the People, are the civil authority, NOT
DC. All power, according to the US Constitution, comes FROM THE
PEOPLE.
Read
the preamble to the US Constitution:
"We
The People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense,
promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United
States of America."
Notice
it says "FOR the United States of America. The Constitution was written
(ordained) BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO FOLLOW, not the other way
around.
So
in consideration of that, when the gun grabbers are trying to disarm us, knowing
that we will fight back, THEY ARE THE ONES inciting insurrection against the
lawful authority of WE THE PEOPLE.
They
are OUTLAWS, Seditionists, and (once this comes to blood) they are then
TRAITORS.
If
the gun grabbers were not outlaws, they would be trying to promote a
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT rescinding the 2nd Amendment. But no, they already know
that it would never work. So instead they buy the DHS over 1.4 BILLION
cartridges and purport to pass some "law" that outlaws guns.
SORRY
BUT THAT IS JUST NOT GOING TO WORK. THEY ARE THE CRIMINALS, just like the
communists throughout history. First they outlaw guns, then con the people into
complying, then they mop up with force on those who refuse.
We
need to make this unmistakably clear. If they try that, they will be treated as
the traitors, and criminals they are, with equal or greater lethal force and all
perfectly lawfully, in God's eyes, and in the eyes of human law as
well. After all, most of us just want to be left alone to live in peace and raise our families, obeying God's laws in hope of an eternity with Him in heaven.
But NO, that is not good enough for the gun grabbers. They will never leave us alone. They will never be satisfied until they own the entire world and we are either dead or their slaves. They are drunk with power and greed, and they are totally controlled by their master, Satan.
May our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ have Mercy on America and her people.
But NO, that is not good enough for the gun grabbers. They will never leave us alone. They will never be satisfied until they own the entire world and we are either dead or their slaves. They are drunk with power and greed, and they are totally controlled by their master, Satan.
May our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ have Mercy on America and her people.
To the gun grabbers I say "Thou Shalt not Kill" You will be judged by God as the aggressors!
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
PRAVDA TELLS AMERICA: KEEP YOUR GUNS
If anyone should understand the disaster that comes after disarming the population it should be the Russian people after the Revolution in 1917.
'At one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth'
If anyone would know that being disarmed is what comes immediately before genocide and terror caused by out of control government it would be the Russian people.
Look what they are telling America now!
http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/pravda-tells-america-keep-your-guns/
'At one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth'
If anyone would know that being disarmed is what comes immediately before genocide and terror caused by out of control government it would be the Russian people.
Look what they are telling America now!
http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/pravda-tells-america-keep-your-guns/
Gun groups to Congress: Members won't register!
Congressional scheme 'will make felons of otherwise law-abiding citizens'
Dianne Feinstein called a hypocrite among other things.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/gun-groups-to-congress-members-wont-register/
Watch the videos at the link above.
Many thousands of people around the country have already made up their minds and have drawn their line in the sand. They will NOT register, or turn in their guns under any circumstances.
They know that all gun control so called "laws" are null and void because they abrogate the US Constitution.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html
They also know that gun control laws not only make the world much more dangerous for law abiding people, but that tyrannical governments have killed more people in the last century than ANY OTHER CAUSE OF DEATH!
They are taking their own safety and well being seriously, and the statistics back them up.
Every time the illegitimate government creates a new gun free zone, that is where the criminals gather to perpetrate their crimes.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/ban-gun-grabbers-and-their-gun-free.html
Then there is the marine that says NO WAY are you taking my guns:
This is where we all need to be.
Senator Dianne
Feinstein,
I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government's right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma'am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.
I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.
I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.
I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.
We, the people, deserve better than you.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012
joshdb50 was a Marine and was deployed to Afghanistan between the years of 2004 through 2005. Although he is no longer in the military he acknowledges that he owns gun. He says he does not believe the government needs to what guns he owns because he believes registration would lead to confiscation. He says the laws that are in place for gun control are plenty, and adding more laws will remove a means of defense for people. 'I own the guns I own because I acknowledge mankind's shortcomings instead of pretending like they don't exist. There are evil men in this world and there just may be a time when I need to do the unthinkable to protect me or my family,' he said.
- Jareen, CNN iReport producer
We need to take the stand that if they actually come out and physically try to take the guns that the results will be so horrific and deadly for them, that nobody will even consider trying.
Over 2 million guns were sold JUST IN DECEMBER of 2012 in this country. That tells me that millions of people have already made that choice. There are estimated to be over 100 million firearms owners now in the USA and something just over 300 millions guns in their lawful possession.
Dianne Feinstein called a hypocrite among other things.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/gun-groups-to-congress-members-wont-register/
Watch the videos at the link above.
Many thousands of people around the country have already made up their minds and have drawn their line in the sand. They will NOT register, or turn in their guns under any circumstances.
They know that all gun control so called "laws" are null and void because they abrogate the US Constitution.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html
They also know that gun control laws not only make the world much more dangerous for law abiding people, but that tyrannical governments have killed more people in the last century than ANY OTHER CAUSE OF DEATH!
They are taking their own safety and well being seriously, and the statistics back them up.
Every time the illegitimate government creates a new gun free zone, that is where the criminals gather to perpetrate their crimes.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/ban-gun-grabbers-and-their-gun-free.html
Then there is the marine that says NO WAY are you taking my guns:
This is where we all need to be.
I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government's right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma'am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.
I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.
I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.
I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.
We, the people, deserve better than you.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012
joshdb50 was a Marine and was deployed to Afghanistan between the years of 2004 through 2005. Although he is no longer in the military he acknowledges that he owns gun. He says he does not believe the government needs to what guns he owns because he believes registration would lead to confiscation. He says the laws that are in place for gun control are plenty, and adding more laws will remove a means of defense for people. 'I own the guns I own because I acknowledge mankind's shortcomings instead of pretending like they don't exist. There are evil men in this world and there just may be a time when I need to do the unthinkable to protect me or my family,' he said.
- Jareen, CNN iReport producer
We need to take the stand that if they actually come out and physically try to take the guns that the results will be so horrific and deadly for them, that nobody will even consider trying.
Over 2 million guns were sold JUST IN DECEMBER of 2012 in this country. That tells me that millions of people have already made that choice. There are estimated to be over 100 million firearms owners now in the USA and something just over 300 millions guns in their lawful possession.
My question is
this. If the elite American military can't win a war in Afghanistan in
11 years against a rag tag militia of AK47 toting rag heads, and the Russians
couldn't win against that same rag tag army in 10 years of war, what makes the worlds'
elite think they can send even a million of their cannon fodder troops into
America and win against 100 MILLION WELL ARMED
AMERICANS WITH OVER 300 MILLION GUNS?
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Remember this movie the next time you walk into a Walmart store!
It is estimated that Walmart does business with over 2000 Chinese companies.
The question nobody wants to answer is how much of these products come from slave labor.
Slave Labor is alive and well in China and you are buying their products.
Over the past 20 years China has become the world's biggest exporter of consumer goods. But behind this apparent success story is a dark secret - millions of men and women locked up in prisons and forced into intensive manual labour.
The question nobody wants to answer is how much of these products come from slave labor.
Slave Labor is alive and well in China and you are buying their products.
Over the past 20 years China has become the world's biggest exporter of consumer goods. But behind this apparent success story is a dark secret - millions of men and women locked up in prisons and forced into intensive manual labour.
Sheriffs called out to fight the law
Local officers predicted to be key to preventing gun confiscation
Read more at
http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/sheriffs-called-out-to-fight-the-law/#ixho8OmjVqcBDQCs.99
A high-profile former sheriff who once sued the U.S. government over its gun regulations – and won – says it is the local sheriff who will have to defend Americans when and if the feds start banning and confiscating guns.
Richard Mack, a former sheriff in Graham County, Ariz., joined with then-Ravalli County Sheriff Jay Printz in a lawsuit against Washington when Bill Clinton demanded sheriffs enforce provisions of the Brady Bill gun control law.
Read more at
http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/sheriffs-called-out-to-fight-the-law/#ixho8OmjVqcBDQCs.99
Tuesday, January 1, 2013
How will Military & Police Respond to The Systematic Gun Grab?
A must listen to interview between Alex Jones and constitutional attorney
Stewart Rhodes. Stewart explains what YOU must do now to save our 2nd Amendment
and your rights as we know them to be. Please, don't ignore the importance of
what must be done if you value your freedom. The time to act is NOW!
Published on Jan 1, 2013
Despite calling in the same year for an outright ban on all firearms, Senator Dianne Feinstein, who is set to introduce legislation that would gut the second amendment, said in 1995 that she carried a concealed gun in order to protect herself against terrorists.http://www.infowars.com/dianne-feinstein-i-carried-a-concealed-weapon/
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/the-gun-grabbers-invented-term-assault.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/so-wayne-lapierre-wants-new-government.html
http://www.infowars.com/articles/military/tillman_new_evidence_indicates_tillman_executed.htm
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2012/12/19/my-personal-pledge-of-resistance-against-any-attemp-to-disarm-us-by-means-of-an-assault-weapons-ban/
Monday, December 31, 2012
Military hero defies Feinstein
SLC Distributing
PO Box 116
Eureka MT 59917
800 889 2839
pstramer@eurekadsl.net
Paul ‘ you probly have already seen this
but I thought I would mail it to you just in case.
Kevin,… PS Thanks for all
the info, I’m going to be giving it out, Diana and I will be spending New Years
Eve With the Big Bear fire Arms Folks and I will make darn shure it gets into
their hands!!!! In paper form. PSS.this morning I heard a commercial by Nazi
Leader Obama trying to get young people to join his new government gastopo
organization this was the first time I have ever heard this commercial . What a
wolf in sheeps clothing!!!!
Feinstein Assault Weapons
Ban Covers Rifles, Pistols and Shotguns
The New Year is just
around the corner and although the Senate still hasn’t made a fiscal cliff deal,
Senator Diane Feinstein already has parts of new gun control legislation ready
to go. Two Sunday’s ago on NBC’s Meet the Press, Feinstein talked about giving
President Obama a bill he can “lead on” and used the term assault weapon
loosely.
Feinstein has posted
a summary of what the legislation will cover, which includes a ban on
semi-automatic handguns and shotguns in addition to rifles. The legislation also
requires registration of previously purchased guns. If passed, ATF would be in
charge of enforcement which should be a huge concern to gun
owners.
Bans the sale, transfer,
importation, or manufacturing of:
120 specifically-named firearms
Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic
Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.
Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressers from the characteristics test
Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans
Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.
Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment
Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes and
Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons
Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
Background check of owner and any transferee;
Type and serial number of the firearm;
Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and
Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration”
120 specifically-named firearms
Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic
Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.
Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressers from the characteristics test
Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans
Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.
Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment
Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes and
Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons
Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
Background check of owner and any transferee;
Type and serial number of the firearm;
Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and
Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration”
Now read the
reaction of one of our military heros to this bill
I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government's right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma'am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.
I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.
We, the people, deserve better than you.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joshua Boston
Cpl, United States Marine Corps
2004-2012
joshdb50 was a Marine and was deployed to Afghanistan between the years of 2004 through 2005. Although he is no longer in the military he acknowledges that he owns gun. He says he does not believe the government needs to what guns he owns because he believes registration would lead to confiscation. He says the laws that are in place for gun control are plenty, and adding more laws will remove a means of defense for people. 'I own the guns I own because I acknowledge mankind's shortcomings instead of pretending like they don't exist. There are evil men in this world and there just may be a time when I need to do the unthinkable to protect me or my family,' he said.
- Jareen, CNN iReport producer
Friday, December 28, 2012
Gun Control and Genocide.
You can't have Genocide without first having Gun Control!
Gary North has written a very powerful and detailed article about Genocide as a result of the lack of the ability of a people to fight back.
You need to read this and print it to give to your sheriff and anyone who advocates gun bans.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north367.html
"There is a reason why governments are committed to disarming their citizens. They want to maintain the monopoly of violence, no matter what. The idea of an armed citizenry is anathema to most politicians. After all, what's a monopoly for, if not to be used?"
Gary North has written a very powerful and detailed article about Genocide as a result of the lack of the ability of a people to fight back.
You need to read this and print it to give to your sheriff and anyone who advocates gun bans.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north367.html
"There is a reason why governments are committed to disarming their citizens. They want to maintain the monopoly of violence, no matter what. The idea of an armed citizenry is anathema to most politicians. After all, what's a monopoly for, if not to be used?"
Is Mass Media the real cause of violent gun crimes?
The star of the new super violent movie Django Unchained, Jamie Fox, realizes the connection between movie violence and actual violence in the real world.
“We cannot turn our back and say that violence in films or anything that we do doesn’t have a sort of influence,” Foxx said. “It does.”
http://www.movieguide.org/articles/main/give-django-an-nc-17-rating.html
The Christian Film & Television Commission® is trying to get the rating changed so nobody under 17 can watch this movie.
Please comment. Do you think that young people watching movies like this are effected in their behavior? Do these movies and violent video games add to the mindset that spawns violent gun crimes like Sandy Hook?
Please click the comments link below and add your thoughts.
“We cannot turn our back and say that violence in films or anything that we do doesn’t have a sort of influence,” Foxx said. “It does.”
http://www.movieguide.org/articles/main/give-django-an-nc-17-rating.html
The Christian Film & Television Commission® is trying to get the rating changed so nobody under 17 can watch this movie.
Please comment. Do you think that young people watching movies like this are effected in their behavior? Do these movies and violent video games add to the mindset that spawns violent gun crimes like Sandy Hook?
Please click the comments link below and add your thoughts.
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Why Shooters Don’t Attack Gun Shows & Police Stations
This is some of the best common sense I have heard about guns.
Read More, and look at the comments section also.
http://conservativevideos.com/2012/12/concealed-carry-mass-shooting-more-carnage/
Read More, and look at the comments section also.
http://conservativevideos.com/2012/12/concealed-carry-mass-shooting-more-carnage/
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
Obama Orders Children Murdered .
Published on Dec 19, 2012
As Obama grandstands and uses the Sandy Hook crisis to, in
the words of Eric Holder "brainwash the public" that guns are bad and the cause
of violent crime and misery, We decided to show just a few of the documented
cases of drone attacks that he personally ordered where children were killed.
Drone attack after drone attack you will see the real face of the Globalists.
This man does not care about children he cares about disarming the American
people to bring in a totalitarian government.
Ban the Gun Grabbers and their Gun Free Zones
Gun Free Zones are lawless Safety Free Zones!
The primary-school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, approximately 45 miles from the Colt Arms Factory, is just another one in the long line of government psyops designed to persuade the public to allow the government to take away their guns, and their means to defend themselves against the government and the banksters that the politicians really serve.
The small children murders are designed to create hysterical emotions in women to get them to demand that guns are banned. If that doesn't work they will continue with their evil agenda with worse and worse atrocities on younger children, until they get their way and disarm the people, so that they cannot fight back against government tyranny.
Newtown is the U.S.A.'s Dunblane, which was orchestrated in Scotland in 1996 by the British establishment, to whip up hysteria in order to ban all handguns from the U.K. It was a follow-up to the Hungerford Massacre in England in 1987, which was carried out by mind-controlled Michael Ryan, who then shot himself so he could not be questioned, and it was used to ban semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.
It's always the same people behind it - the gun-grabbers who want the people to be defenceless against the gun-grabbers' employers - the banksters who own all of the politicians. They get their politicians to pass legislation for them, in order to remove the people's freedoms and means of defending themselves, and enslave them in a draconian police-state, under a mountain of debt, and then exterminate the useless-eaters.
The Dunblane massacre was supposedly carried out by Thomas Hamilton, who was a paedophile and procurer of children, for a high level paedophile ring involving senior members of the Tony Blair Labour-Party shadow-cabinet and others. The massacre served two purposes, it achieved their desired handgun-ban and killed the abused children, so they could not be witnesses against the elite-paedophiles. They then had the findings of the inquiry sealed for 100 years, which is proof of the above.
Like Newtown there were two shooters, Hamilton and a hit-man who shot Hamilton and made it look like Hamilton committed suicide after shooting 16 children, so that he couldn't be questioned. Hamilton was found in the school gymnasium slumped against a wall and still gurgling, when an off-duty policeman PC Grant McCutcheon entered the gym and saw two semi-automatic pistols, one on either side of Hamilton's body.
The autopsy revealed that Hamilton was killed with a .38 revolver. These people always slip-up with their crimes. There was no .38 revolver for him to have shot himself with. Thus, there was a second shooter who killed Hamilton.
Similarly, the first reports from Newtown were of two shooters, just like mind-controlled James Holmes in the Denver Batman Cinema massacre, the story then quickly changes to just one.
Columbine was similar, in that a team of shooters in black outfits were seen there and the two accused were on mind-altering prescription-drugs.
Wake up and see the pattern and their modus operandi and don't fall for it. Never let them take your guns, except from your cold dead hands.
All of these are staged events to whip-up hysterical public support for banning the people from having guns. It works the same in every country - Hungerford in England, Dunblane in Scotland, Port Arthur in Australia and the list in America is endless, because of the Second Amendment and the people having a pro-gun culture. That makes it much more difficult to break the Americans' love of guns and the Second Amendment, which was put in place to protect the people from the government.
Gun bans work well for tyrants. They worked well for Hitler, Stalin and Chairman Mao, to name just three.
If you want to stop these massacres, wake-up and get rid of the banksters, their puppet-politicians and all gun-grabbers; arm teachers and ban gun-free zones.
From one who can see the pattern and hopes to enable you to see it too.
Freedom Fighter
------------------------------------------
"Gun-free zones are like magnets for the monsters in our society" - Larry Pratt GOA
The above article is from one of our readers, and I challenge you to prove this wrong.
Click the comment link right below.
The primary-school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, approximately 45 miles from the Colt Arms Factory, is just another one in the long line of government psyops designed to persuade the public to allow the government to take away their guns, and their means to defend themselves against the government and the banksters that the politicians really serve.
The small children murders are designed to create hysterical emotions in women to get them to demand that guns are banned. If that doesn't work they will continue with their evil agenda with worse and worse atrocities on younger children, until they get their way and disarm the people, so that they cannot fight back against government tyranny.
Newtown is the U.S.A.'s Dunblane, which was orchestrated in Scotland in 1996 by the British establishment, to whip up hysteria in order to ban all handguns from the U.K. It was a follow-up to the Hungerford Massacre in England in 1987, which was carried out by mind-controlled Michael Ryan, who then shot himself so he could not be questioned, and it was used to ban semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.
It's always the same people behind it - the gun-grabbers who want the people to be defenceless against the gun-grabbers' employers - the banksters who own all of the politicians. They get their politicians to pass legislation for them, in order to remove the people's freedoms and means of defending themselves, and enslave them in a draconian police-state, under a mountain of debt, and then exterminate the useless-eaters.
The Dunblane massacre was supposedly carried out by Thomas Hamilton, who was a paedophile and procurer of children, for a high level paedophile ring involving senior members of the Tony Blair Labour-Party shadow-cabinet and others. The massacre served two purposes, it achieved their desired handgun-ban and killed the abused children, so they could not be witnesses against the elite-paedophiles. They then had the findings of the inquiry sealed for 100 years, which is proof of the above.
Like Newtown there were two shooters, Hamilton and a hit-man who shot Hamilton and made it look like Hamilton committed suicide after shooting 16 children, so that he couldn't be questioned. Hamilton was found in the school gymnasium slumped against a wall and still gurgling, when an off-duty policeman PC Grant McCutcheon entered the gym and saw two semi-automatic pistols, one on either side of Hamilton's body.
The autopsy revealed that Hamilton was killed with a .38 revolver. These people always slip-up with their crimes. There was no .38 revolver for him to have shot himself with. Thus, there was a second shooter who killed Hamilton.
Similarly, the first reports from Newtown were of two shooters, just like mind-controlled James Holmes in the Denver Batman Cinema massacre, the story then quickly changes to just one.
Columbine was similar, in that a team of shooters in black outfits were seen there and the two accused were on mind-altering prescription-drugs.
Wake up and see the pattern and their modus operandi and don't fall for it. Never let them take your guns, except from your cold dead hands.
All of these are staged events to whip-up hysterical public support for banning the people from having guns. It works the same in every country - Hungerford in England, Dunblane in Scotland, Port Arthur in Australia and the list in America is endless, because of the Second Amendment and the people having a pro-gun culture. That makes it much more difficult to break the Americans' love of guns and the Second Amendment, which was put in place to protect the people from the government.
Gun bans work well for tyrants. They worked well for Hitler, Stalin and Chairman Mao, to name just three.
If you want to stop these massacres, wake-up and get rid of the banksters, their puppet-politicians and all gun-grabbers; arm teachers and ban gun-free zones.
From one who can see the pattern and hopes to enable you to see it too.
Freedom Fighter
------------------------------------------
"Gun-free zones are like magnets for the monsters in our society" - Larry Pratt GOA
The above article is from one of our readers, and I challenge you to prove this wrong.
Click the comment link right below.
Monday, December 24, 2012
So Wayne LaPierre wants a new government police force to police the schools.
BIG MISTAKE!!!!!!!!!!
Is the answer to everything more
government? What makes him think the guard in uniform won't be the
firstone to die?
And then who is left to protect the kids? The
uniform just makes it easier for the criminal to identify, target and take out
the persons most likely to offer resistance to their intended
crimes.
If anyone in the country should know that more
government doesn't work it should be the
NRA.
The government had Dianne Feinsteine's assault
weapons "law" on the books in the 90s and the Columbine shooting still happened. The ban did absolutely
nothing to stop it, and La Pierre knows that. Banning weapons in
certain places just creates FREE KILLING ZONES FOR THE CRAZY
PEOPLE, AND FOR GOVERNMENT HIT SQUADS.
Mr. La Pierre, you said the mental health system has
totally collapsed. What do you suggest to fix that? Would you give that to government also? Will you let failed
"mental health professionals" decide who is sane and who is not? Would you
now let government mental health people getting paid by
our tax money decide who can have guns and who can't?
WHAT WOULD MAKE US BELIEVE that these people
wouldn't tend to try to justify their own paycheck like everyone else in government, by putting lots of people on the
unworthy list that don't belong there? What makes you think that veterans and
shooting enthusiasts wouldn't be put on the list or
committed for mental health reasons, to remove opposition to the gun grabbers.
What government agency do you know of that wouldn't
use this to remove their opposition? What government agency do you know of
that operates using pure and moral or even lawful
intent?
After all, the jails are full, so the people that
run them can keep the per diem pay coming. Look at the result of the so called
drug war.
The jails are full of people who either got caught
with a half ounce of marijuana, or had evidence planted by crooked cops so they
could confiscate their stuff. Police departments are
auctioning off all kinds of stuff they confiscated and keeping the money to
finance more firepower and military style equipment so they can
do even more raiding. It's a vicious cycle of plunder under the color of
"law".
It's so bad now that there are over 2 MILLION
people behind bars in this country that we have to support with our tax
dollars.
The jails and the courts and cops that keep them
full are now a huge GROWTH INDUSTRY worth billions upon billions of
dollars per year.
So do you want, now, to make the mental hospitals a
GROWTH INDUSTRY the same as the prison system? Really?
IS THAT YOUR SOLUTION? Come on,
get real. You can do a lot better than that!
Is this what you call compromise; giving
up something that involves our rights, to get what might not even
make a little more safety?
The dictionary definition of compromise
is:
"...settlement
of differences by arbitration or by consent reached by mutual
concessions".
There
can be NO concession, or infringement on
gun rights, in the same way that there can be NO concession on your absolute
right to defend
yourself and your neighbor against a
threat to your life and well-being by someone using lethal force.
Read
this article on what is really the law about guns: http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html
The
NRA is famous for this compromising of our absolute rights.
PROHIBITED PLACES LAWS make absolutely no sense whatsoever.
An
example right here in Montana is the so called law that prohibits a lawfully
carrying person, even a concealed carry permit holder, from carrying
his weapon in a cafe that serves beer and wine.
In
the first place, I have never seen any person in the cafes that I eat in ever
get rowdy from
too much to drink.
Second,
if someone did, and I needed my gun to protect myself, it would be out in the
car. A fat lot of good that would do me.
If
I am eating and not consuming alcohol, the stupid so called "law" prevents me
from defending myself and my family.
Third,
there is no reason to believe that
a concealed carry permit holder who has kept his record clean enough to hold
that permit, is going to leave all that effort and common sense behind when
he/she goes in
that cafe. Ask the lady that testified before congress who watched her parents
get shot and killed by the crazy gunman that crashed his vehicle through the
front window of a fast food place in
Texas and started shooting people. Her gun was in the car outside because the
stupid prohibited places "law" said she couldn't have it in the
cafe and like most "law abiding" people she left HER COMMON SENSE at the door in
an attempt to obey a bad "law". Do you really think it was a law and that she
should have followed it? Do you really think she would do that same thing again,
regardless of what the so called "law" says?
Then
there is the federal so called "law" that stops even concealed permit holders
from carrying in a post office. They even want you to not have it in your car
in the parking lot.
What
absolute stupidity! So you are in the precious metals business. Your
product is valuable. Very valuable. A little box that weighs in at 37 pounds,
and measures about 12" X 8" X 5" can be worth over $20,000. So you come to the
post office to pick up a shipment that is shipped via registered mail, which
packages always by postal regulations have to be kept in a safe
when not being delivered, and the so called "law" makes it so you can't carry
even a concealed handgun to protect yourself from a possible
robbery.
Not
only can you not carry in the building, but they don't even want your gun in the
parking lot, so now you are forced to park OFF THE POSTAL PROPERTY, which
requires you to carry that box of silver much farther WITHOUT YOUR GUN. How
absolutely insane is that? Who should have their head examined now? Yes, the
people that wrote that insane so called "law". Do you really think that is a
law?
Take
a look at that link again: http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/all-gun-control-so-called-laws-are-null.html
Then
let's go to the bank with about $80,000 in cash to buy a cashiers check to pay
for that precious metal. At least there is a little running room on this one.
While that so called "law" is supposed to prevent a concealed carry permit holder from carrying concealed in the bank, it lets you carry in the open. So
now your gun is right there on your hip for everyone in the bank to
see.
So
you come in the bank with a large amount of cash to deposit in your account so
you can get a cashiers check to send to the mint in payment for an order for one
of your customers, and one of the tellers, perhaps a new one that doesn't know
you, pushes the silent alarm button and all hell breaks lose. Wouldn't it have
been better to carry that gun concealed like you can do lawfully almost anywhere
else, and not upset the banks' help or their customers, and yet you would still
be protected from a possible robbery or assault? Again, who wrote such an
insane law? Maybe they should have their head examined by that government goon
mental health professional?
So
now we come back to the school, or the theatre, where most of these crimes seem
to be taking place.
In
1990 the government purported to put a "law" on the books called "The gun free
school zones act of 1990". In 1995 the Supreme Court blew it out of the
water.
Then the infamous Janet Reno, made some changes that were
"adopted and widely concealed" to get around the Supreme Court's decision, and
today all the school authorities believe that one can not have a gun within 1000 feet of school property without a concealed carry permit. This change has yet
to be challenged in the Supreme Court.
In any case what this so called "law" did was make it
possible for criminals to come to a school with the reasonable assumption that
there would be no armed intervention while they were committing their crimes.
The same result applies to a theater who's owner opts to prohibit any guns in their building. They
create a "gun free zone" translation "law free zone" where law and order goes
out the window.
The real solution that will
work.
In the case of a school, the administrative staff, those
that are willing, should get the proper training at some kind of professional
firearms training facility like Front Sight in Pahrump Nevada (www.frontsight.com) and they should all
carry concealed at the school during school hours. Right now they can do that if
they have a concealed carry permit. They don't have to spend money to pass any
new "law" under current interpretation. If the school wants to hire an armed
guard, that person or persons should also do so with a concealed weapon and the
only requirement would be that the guard has a concealed carry permit, but they
also should get that proper training. That way the prospective shooter would
not know who was armed.
Then, and this is the big one, the school
should post signs and advertise to the effect that any lethal force will be met
with more than equal lethal force.
This also applies even better at the theater. The theater should advertise first for people who have a concealed carry permit to come and
be interviewed to receive some free tickets during the year, in return for
carrying concealed while they are in the theater. The theater should insist that
the perspective free ticket user should also have the proper training at a
proper facility as mentioned above. Then the theater can advertise that there
will be maybe a hundred people allowed to carry concealed in their theater, and
that nobody will know who they are and when they will be using one of their
tickets to attend a free movie. The theater can also say something to the effect
that their buildings are not a gun free zone, but a crime free
zone.
I
can hear gun control people screaming "bloody murder" at me right now. Those
that do, ask yourself just one question.
Why do these whacos pick schools and theaters in the first place??? It's
because of the stupid gun zone "laws", dummy! Duh!
Don't believe it??? Read this: http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd565.htm
And finally, why am I using quotes around the word "laws" so much?
Again:
And here are more facts:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2012/12/crazy-shootings-dont-believe-media.html
And from Ron Paul:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/ron-paul-slams-nra-proposal-for-armed-guards-in-schools-govt-security-just-another-kind-of-violence/
And from Ron Paul:
http://www.mediaite.com/online/ron-paul-slams-nra-proposal-for-armed-guards-in-schools-govt-security-just-another-kind-of-violence/
Paul Stramer
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Was Sandy Hook a Manufactured Crisis to take your guns?
Massacres and Guns
Why Switzerland Has The Lowest Crime Rate In The World
Read the comments on this blog page:
http://dont-tread-on.me/?p=26125
What about this:
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/12/sandy-hook-false-flag-2-years-in-the-making-2524626.html
What about this:
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/12/sandy-hook-false-flag-2-years-in-the-making-2524626.html
Saturday, December 22, 2012
The gun grabbers invented the term "assault rifle" to further their own agenda.
Send this out till your fingers are
sore!
The gun grabbers invented the term
"assault rifle" to further their own agenda.
Note the picture of the WW Two soldier or Korean War soldier proudly
holding his M-1 rifle in the article at the link below. This was the military style assault and main
battle rifle until the early to mid sixties when the M-16 came on line. The
M-16 began that "look" that is so upsetting to the gun grabbers. But in
reality, It did nothing that the wooden stocked M-1 could do. And the M-16
started the use of the small .223 caliber which the military uses today. The
M-1 was a 30-06, much, much more lethal.
I can remember when you could
order an M-1 for under $100 from the back pages of many magazines. I have
trained with the M-1 Garand and it was capable of fully automatic or
semi-auto.Friday, December 21, 2012
Armed Citizen Saves Cop’s Life
Sgt. Steven Means of the Early Police Department in Texas, is one law enforcement officer that is thankful for the Second Amendment right for citizens to bear arms.
Read more:
http://godfatherpolitics.com/8635/armed-citizen-saves-cops-life/#ixzz2Fl6lOOCa
Read more:
http://godfatherpolitics.com/8635/armed-citizen-saves-cops-life/#ixzz2Fl6lOOCa
Gun Owner Saves Cop's Life by Shooting Deranged Gunman!
All "gun control" so called laws are Null and Void
There are NO valid gun control laws in the USA. They want you to believe those "laws" are valid and law for you and I to follow but they are NOT valid, NOT lawful and NOT in force.
How do I know that? Just keep reading.
1. Go to any search engine, like www.ixquick.com or www.google.com and type in dick act repealed.
You will see a whole page of articles on the Dick Act of 1902. I am NOT talking about any act passed in 1903. This was the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654
The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
I have found page after page on the internet that all essentially say the same thing.
Here are some links.
http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3949
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread483246/pg1
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/108957/DICK_ACT_of_1902_CANT_BE_REPEALED_GUN_CONTROL_FORBIDDEN/
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=151233
http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642
2. Then there is the principle that unconstitutional "laws" are null and void from their inception.
How do I know that? Just keep reading.
1. Go to any search engine, like www.ixquick.com or www.google.com and type in dick act repealed.
You will see a whole page of articles on the Dick Act of 1902. I am NOT talking about any act passed in 1903. This was the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654
The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
I have found page after page on the internet that all essentially say the same thing.
Here are some links.
http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3949
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread483246/pg1
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/108957/DICK_ACT_of_1902_CANT_BE_REPEALED_GUN_CONTROL_FORBIDDEN/
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=151233
http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642
2. Then there is the principle that unconstitutional "laws" are null and void from their inception.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491. " An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton Vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
The higher laws always prevail when there is a conflict between them. There never will be a conflict between positive divine law, and natural law. They are.
1. Positive Divine Law
2. Natural Law
3. Human law notice it is on the bottom and the least of all law. This includes all civil and criminal "laws" and even cannon law.
Whenever there is a conflict between any of these, the higher laws are always to prevail in God's eyes and they do.
3. The current government wants all jury trials to go away. They want their corrupt judges to try all cases without a jury. They have been working for years to discredit Juries.
YOU HAVE THE POWER TO NULLIFY (refuse to apply) any bad so called "laws" as an individual juror. Yes, you have that power; it is real; it is now; and all you need to use it is the knowledge that you have that power.
Your jury rights are your most powerful rights. Instead of trying to avoid jury duty, you should be trying to get on every jury you can. That will give you ample opportunity to educate your fellow jurors about their right to nullify bad "laws". It will also get you into a position where you can (all by yourself without another person) nullify bad law by hanging the jury (refusing to apply the so called "law" to the case you are on).
If you don't believe me take a look at this.
http://www.juryrights.info
If you don't believe me take a look at this.
http://www.juryrights.info
4. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.
The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army.
5. The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.
The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
6. Then there is the Montana Firearms Freedom Act, which was passed and signed into law by Governor Schweitzer.
Pertaining specifically to the Second Amendment, the State of Montana, in particular, seems to have it all together. In anticipation of the recent Heller Supreme Court decision, a host of Montana's senators and representatives—along with its Secretary of State— proposed a resolution stating "that any 'collective rights' holding in D.C. v. Heller will violate Montana's compact with the United States, the contract by which Montana entered the Union in 1889."
The Montana resolution recalls, "When Montana entered into statehood and adopted the Compact as a part of the Montana Constitution in 1889, included was a provision guaranteeing the right to bear arms to 'any person.'"
The resolution continues, "To be clear, the wording of the right to bear arms reservation in the Montana constitution is exactly the same today as it was in 1884."
Furthermore, the Montana resolution says, "There is no question that the contract into which Montana entered for statehood was predicated upon an understanding that the people of Montana would benefit from an individual and personal right to bear arms, protected from governmental interference by both the federal and Montana constitutions. That was the clear intent of the parties to the contract."
The resolution ended by stating sternly, "A collective rights holding in Heller would not only open the Pandora's box of unilaterally morphing contracts, it would also poise Montana to claim appropriate and historically entrenched remedies for contract violation."
In other words, representatives and senators in the State of Montana unequivocally put Washington, D.C., on notice that it would not tolerate the infringement of its citizens' right to keep and bear arms. I don't think I'm reading anything into the resolution by assuming that they were implying that they would secede before they let the federal government trample their Second Amendment liberties. (Plus, I've just been told that New Hampshire may also be preparing to propose such a resolution.)
7. Then there is the original compact that Montana entered with the federal government when we became a state. No less than 2 Attorneys General and one Governor have warned the Feds that any abrogation of firearms freedom in Montana by the feds will result in the breaking of that compact, which in it's logical conclusion would (in my opinion) result in Montana no longer being a State of that federal union.
8. Then there is the ABSOLUTE natural law right to self defense. Your inalienable and individual right was always contained in the US Constitution, but was clarified in 2008 by the US Supreme Court.
How about this "what if" gun seizure scenrio?
And finally "The Coming Gun Grab" received this morning from a Montana patriot who will remain anonymous.
" I'm not worried about a successful gun confiscation program in America. I just don't know if enough Americans will have the guts to shoot the government thugs. That is the only relevant question regarding future gun control. On this point, I quote from a speech by the latte novelist Taylor Caldwell:
"I'm going to castigate all you men here for what you have done to America - every mother's son of you.
How did we arrive at this disastrous hour in time? I will tell you. You men.... abdicated your manhood!
You deserted the Republic. Aristotle said two thousand and five hunred years ago: "Masculine republics decline into feminine democracies and democracies into despotism." That is what has happened to America now. We call ourselves a free country. We are not free! Tomorrow the tyranny will be overt instead of covert as it is now.
Is there any hope? Well, only a little, and I;m afraid that few men will take advantage of it. One: Challenge your government and, if you suffer for it, to hell with sweet peace.
TWO: FIGHT GUN CONTROL! It is your right to bear arms under the Constitution (THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND FOR GOVERNMENT TO FOLLOW) but the tyrants want to take away your arms so you won't be able to offer any resistance to bayonets!
Gentlemen, you can restore your dead Republic. But be again the masters of your government and be again the masters of your women or will you meekly say: "Hail, Caeser, we who are about to die salute you."
(End quote from Tayler Caldwell)
Don't worry that they'll get your guns. Worry that you might NOT have the guts to use them. Will you let federal barbarians storm your neighborhood, breaking down doors - or will everybody on your block rain a torrent of copper-jacketed lead on these thugs? It's about to hit the fan - will you be courageous?
If you can't imagine -gasp!- defending your rights and your property and your family against the Government, then SELL YOUR GUNS TO A REAL MAN. Who are you fooling? You don't deserve a Zeiss-scoped Sako any more than a .22 Jennings.
Give up your guns now and spare yourself the embarrassment later.
The 2nd Amendment is for men - not hobbyists.
And here is one of the best pledges I have ever read from a man that I know personally and who I absolutely believe will do exactly as he says:
My Personal Pledge of Resistance Against Any Attemp to Disarm Us by Means of an "Assault Weapons Ban"
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2012/12/19/my-personal-pledge-of-resistance-against-any-attemp-to-disarm-us-by-means-of-an-assault-weapons-ban/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
TWO: FIGHT GUN CONTROL! It is your right to bear arms under the Constitution (THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND FOR GOVERNMENT TO FOLLOW) but the tyrants want to take away your arms so you won't be able to offer any resistance to bayonets!
Gentlemen, you can restore your dead Republic. But be again the masters of your government and be again the masters of your women or will you meekly say: "Hail, Caeser, we who are about to die salute you."
(End quote from Tayler Caldwell)
Don't worry that they'll get your guns. Worry that you might NOT have the guts to use them. Will you let federal barbarians storm your neighborhood, breaking down doors - or will everybody on your block rain a torrent of copper-jacketed lead on these thugs? It's about to hit the fan - will you be courageous?
If you can't imagine -gasp!- defending your rights and your property and your family against the Government, then SELL YOUR GUNS TO A REAL MAN. Who are you fooling? You don't deserve a Zeiss-scoped Sako any more than a .22 Jennings.
Give up your guns now and spare yourself the embarrassment later.
The 2nd Amendment is for men - not hobbyists.
And here is one of the best pledges I have ever read from a man that I know personally and who I absolutely believe will do exactly as he says:
My Personal Pledge of Resistance Against Any Attemp to Disarm Us by Means of an "Assault Weapons Ban"
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2012/12/19/my-personal-pledge-of-resistance-against-any-attemp-to-disarm-us-by-means-of-an-assault-weapons-ban/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2012 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)