Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress
You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
National Inflation Association on Silver Short Squeeze coming.
How much over spot is a good price for silver and gold?
A good price for a 1 oz silver coin like an American Eagle or Canadian Maple Leaf is 12% over spot, and a good price for a 1 oz silver bar is 6% over spot.
For gold, a good price for a 1 oz gold coin like an American Eagle or Canadian Maple Leaf is 4% over spot, and a good price for a 1 oz gold bar is 2% over spot.
The larger premium for silver compared to gold indicates a shortage in the physical silver market.
Now that GATA has blown the doors off the LBMA ponzi scheme, and we know there is only 1 oz of silver for every 100 oz represented on paper, why hasn't there been a panic to dump paper and go into physical? What will it take to trigger a short squeeze?
We don't believe there is only 1 oz of physical silver for every 100 oz represented on paper. Most likely, there is 1 to 3 times more paper silver than physical silver. This is still a major problem that will ultimately result in a major silver shortage and short squeeze, once a large number of COMEX holders begin to demand physical delivery of silver. This is a topic that we will be covering extensively in our new documentary coming out next month.
If the silver market is controlled by JP Morgan and others, how does the little guy stand a chance of making money?
The manipulation by JP Morgan through naked short selling is providing an opportunity for normal everyday investors to purchase silver at dirt-cheap prices. Without JP Morgan's naked short selling, it's possible silver would already be well above $30 per ounce right now.
Remember, JP Morgan is not manipulating silver up, they are manipulating it down and the manipulation can't last forever. When investors around the globe call for physical delivery of their silver, there will be a shortage of physical silver and JP Morgan will be forced to cover their naked short position, causing silver prices to explode to the upside.
NIA believes silver will eventually see the biggest short squeeze in the history of all commodities.
http://www.inflation.us/
Buy silver here: http://www.teapartysilver.com/
Earn silver here: http://www.silversnowball.net/
A good price for a 1 oz silver coin like an American Eagle or Canadian Maple Leaf is 12% over spot, and a good price for a 1 oz silver bar is 6% over spot.
For gold, a good price for a 1 oz gold coin like an American Eagle or Canadian Maple Leaf is 4% over spot, and a good price for a 1 oz gold bar is 2% over spot.
The larger premium for silver compared to gold indicates a shortage in the physical silver market.
Now that GATA has blown the doors off the LBMA ponzi scheme, and we know there is only 1 oz of silver for every 100 oz represented on paper, why hasn't there been a panic to dump paper and go into physical? What will it take to trigger a short squeeze?
We don't believe there is only 1 oz of physical silver for every 100 oz represented on paper. Most likely, there is 1 to 3 times more paper silver than physical silver. This is still a major problem that will ultimately result in a major silver shortage and short squeeze, once a large number of COMEX holders begin to demand physical delivery of silver. This is a topic that we will be covering extensively in our new documentary coming out next month.
If the silver market is controlled by JP Morgan and others, how does the little guy stand a chance of making money?
The manipulation by JP Morgan through naked short selling is providing an opportunity for normal everyday investors to purchase silver at dirt-cheap prices. Without JP Morgan's naked short selling, it's possible silver would already be well above $30 per ounce right now.
Remember, JP Morgan is not manipulating silver up, they are manipulating it down and the manipulation can't last forever. When investors around the globe call for physical delivery of their silver, there will be a shortage of physical silver and JP Morgan will be forced to cover their naked short position, causing silver prices to explode to the upside.
NIA believes silver will eventually see the biggest short squeeze in the history of all commodities.
http://www.inflation.us/
Buy silver here: http://www.teapartysilver.com/
Earn silver here: http://www.silversnowball.net/
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Oath Keepers - we are in good company now - SPLC declares Ron Paul and Napolitano "Extremist" Enablers
Oath Keepers - we are in good company now - SPLC declares Ron Paul and Napolitano "Extremist" Enablers. How can the SPLC even think they have any credibility anymore? The George Soros funded group is running scared. It is time for OK to stand up to them again and make it clear....we want peacefull change and restoration of the Constitutional Republic.
SPLC Declares Paul and Napolitano “Extremist” Enablers
Posted By Oath Keepers Admin On April 16, 2010 @ 1:19 pm In Featured Stories 41 Comments
Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com
April 16, 2010
Ron Paul and Andrew Napolitano, along with Michele Bachmann and Glenn Beck, are anti-government patriot movement “enablers,” according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.
The SPLC insinuates that Paul and Napolitano are “enablers” for domestic terrorism.
“These men and women have helped to put key Patriot themes — the idea that President Obama is a Marxist, that he and other elites in the government are pushing a socialist takeover, that the United States plans secret concentration camps and so on — before millions of Americans, many of whom actually believe these completely false allegations,” declares the SPLC in a recent web posting. “Whether these people tell such tall tales because they believe them or simply because they are willing to shamelessly pander for votes or ratings, is anyone’s guess; but the noxious effect on the body politic is the same.”
More lies. In fact, Ron Paul has deemed Obama a corporatist, not a Marxist. During the Southern Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans, Dr. Paul said: “The question has been raised about whether or not our president is a socialist. I am sure there are some people here who believe it. But in the technical sense, in the economic definition of a what a socialist is, no, he’s not a socialist…. He’s a corporatist. And unfortunately we have corporatists inside the Republican party and that means you take care of corporations and corporations take over and run the country.”
“Whether he’s advocating pulling out of the United Nations, trashing the Fed, or returning to the gold standard, Paul’s views have scored him plenty of points among the Patriot crowd,” writes the SPLC, and these mainstream Libertarian ideals “stoke fears of an overreaching government on the far right.”
The SPLC fear-mongering machine has long claimed the patriot movement is associated with white supremacists and militias and may engage in violence. In fact, there is plenty of evidence that the SPLC itself has “enabled” the miniscule and completely irrelevant white supremacist movement in order to magnify the ludicrous threat they claim these fringe groups pose.
In 2004, a declassified FBI memo obtained by an Oklahoma newspaper revealed that the SPLC had operatives inside the Identity settlement in Elohim City, Oklahoma. “References to an informant working for the SPLC at Elohim City on the eve of the Oklahoma City bombing raises serious questions as to what the SPLC might know about McVeigh’s activities during the final hours before the fuse was lit in Oklahoma City – but which the SPLC has failed to disclose publicly,” the Daily Gazette reported.
In order to defame Ron Paul and characterize him as a racist fellow traveler, the SPLC dredges up comments published in The Ron Paul Survival Report in 1996. “The quotations in The New Republic article [the neocon publication that attempted to discredit Paul with the accusation] are not mine and do not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts,” Paul said. “In fact, I have always agreed with Martin Luther King, Jr. that we should only be concerned with the content of a person’s character, not the color of their skin.”
“Paul claimed in 2001 that ghostwriters had penned the newsletters that bear his name but acknowledged he bore ’some moral responsibility,’” adds the SPLC in a crude attempt to make the controversy stick and portray Paul as a racist.
The SPLC has completely ignored Ron Paul’s denouncement of racism. “Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans only as members of groups and never as individuals. Racists believe that all individual who share superficial physical characteristics are alike; as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups,” he has said.
Former New Jersey judge Andrew Napolitano, according to the SPLC, “missed out on rubbing elbows with neo-Confederates, conspiracy theorists and antigovernment Patriot activists” when he failed to show as a keynote speaker in February at the first annual Tenth Amendment Summit in Atlanta. “It seems the TV judge is vying to become a fixture on the far-right lecture circuit” and his very presence of Fox weakens the network’s credibility, according to the SPLC.
For the SPLC, any defense of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights represents far-right kookiness. It is a bellwether of violence, racial hatred, and “antigovernment extremism.”
The SPLC characterizes Napolitano as a conspiracy nut for pointing out Obamacare contains death panels. In fact, the legislation does contain provisions for moving the elderly off the mortal coil, although it does not specifically mention death panels. In late March, the so-called economist Paul Krugman admitted Obamacare contains language providing for what amounts to death panels.
The SPLC slams Sarah Palin on her death panel comments but fails to put the remarks in a larger context. “Government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course,” Palin wrote on her Facebook page.
The SPLC is tasked with destroying the patriot movement by portraying it as a fringe phenomenon consisting of dangerous radicals and even psychopathic domestic terrorists who have supposedly teamed up with white supremacist militias and other violent miscreants. Of course, this is nothing more than propaganda, character assassination, slander, and defamation.
Both Ron Paul and Andrew Napolitano are dedicated constitutionalists who demand the federal government return to the principles of the founding document and stop imposing mandates on the states in violation of the Tenth Amendment and the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. They have consistently defended the Bill of Rights against the tyrannical actions of both the Republicans and Democrats.
The SPLC and its ideological twin, the Anti-Defamation League, are engaged in a desperate effort to silence the patriot movement through baseless and slanderous accusations. It will not work. Millions of Americans have arrived at the conclusion that the federal government is indeed an authoritarian leviathan. In response, increasing numbers support the Tea Party movement and other patriot groups.
SPLC Declares Paul and Napolitano “Extremist” Enablers
Posted By Oath Keepers Admin On April 16, 2010 @ 1:19 pm In Featured Stories 41 Comments
Kurt Nimmo Infowars.com
April 16, 2010
Ron Paul and Andrew Napolitano, along with Michele Bachmann and Glenn Beck, are anti-government patriot movement “enablers,” according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.
The SPLC insinuates that Paul and Napolitano are “enablers” for domestic terrorism.
“These men and women have helped to put key Patriot themes — the idea that President Obama is a Marxist, that he and other elites in the government are pushing a socialist takeover, that the United States plans secret concentration camps and so on — before millions of Americans, many of whom actually believe these completely false allegations,” declares the SPLC in a recent web posting. “Whether these people tell such tall tales because they believe them or simply because they are willing to shamelessly pander for votes or ratings, is anyone’s guess; but the noxious effect on the body politic is the same.”
More lies. In fact, Ron Paul has deemed Obama a corporatist, not a Marxist. During the Southern Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans, Dr. Paul said: “The question has been raised about whether or not our president is a socialist. I am sure there are some people here who believe it. But in the technical sense, in the economic definition of a what a socialist is, no, he’s not a socialist…. He’s a corporatist. And unfortunately we have corporatists inside the Republican party and that means you take care of corporations and corporations take over and run the country.”
“Whether he’s advocating pulling out of the United Nations, trashing the Fed, or returning to the gold standard, Paul’s views have scored him plenty of points among the Patriot crowd,” writes the SPLC, and these mainstream Libertarian ideals “stoke fears of an overreaching government on the far right.”
The SPLC fear-mongering machine has long claimed the patriot movement is associated with white supremacists and militias and may engage in violence. In fact, there is plenty of evidence that the SPLC itself has “enabled” the miniscule and completely irrelevant white supremacist movement in order to magnify the ludicrous threat they claim these fringe groups pose.
In 2004, a declassified FBI memo obtained by an Oklahoma newspaper revealed that the SPLC had operatives inside the Identity settlement in Elohim City, Oklahoma. “References to an informant working for the SPLC at Elohim City on the eve of the Oklahoma City bombing raises serious questions as to what the SPLC might know about McVeigh’s activities during the final hours before the fuse was lit in Oklahoma City – but which the SPLC has failed to disclose publicly,” the Daily Gazette reported.
In order to defame Ron Paul and characterize him as a racist fellow traveler, the SPLC dredges up comments published in The Ron Paul Survival Report in 1996. “The quotations in The New Republic article [the neocon publication that attempted to discredit Paul with the accusation] are not mine and do not represent what I believe or have ever believed. I have never uttered such words and denounce such small-minded thoughts,” Paul said. “In fact, I have always agreed with Martin Luther King, Jr. that we should only be concerned with the content of a person’s character, not the color of their skin.”
“Paul claimed in 2001 that ghostwriters had penned the newsletters that bear his name but acknowledged he bore ’some moral responsibility,’” adds the SPLC in a crude attempt to make the controversy stick and portray Paul as a racist.
The SPLC has completely ignored Ron Paul’s denouncement of racism. “Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans only as members of groups and never as individuals. Racists believe that all individual who share superficial physical characteristics are alike; as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups,” he has said.
Former New Jersey judge Andrew Napolitano, according to the SPLC, “missed out on rubbing elbows with neo-Confederates, conspiracy theorists and antigovernment Patriot activists” when he failed to show as a keynote speaker in February at the first annual Tenth Amendment Summit in Atlanta. “It seems the TV judge is vying to become a fixture on the far-right lecture circuit” and his very presence of Fox weakens the network’s credibility, according to the SPLC.
For the SPLC, any defense of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights represents far-right kookiness. It is a bellwether of violence, racial hatred, and “antigovernment extremism.”
The SPLC characterizes Napolitano as a conspiracy nut for pointing out Obamacare contains death panels. In fact, the legislation does contain provisions for moving the elderly off the mortal coil, although it does not specifically mention death panels. In late March, the so-called economist Paul Krugman admitted Obamacare contains language providing for what amounts to death panels.
The SPLC slams Sarah Palin on her death panel comments but fails to put the remarks in a larger context. “Government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course,” Palin wrote on her Facebook page.
The SPLC is tasked with destroying the patriot movement by portraying it as a fringe phenomenon consisting of dangerous radicals and even psychopathic domestic terrorists who have supposedly teamed up with white supremacist militias and other violent miscreants. Of course, this is nothing more than propaganda, character assassination, slander, and defamation.
Both Ron Paul and Andrew Napolitano are dedicated constitutionalists who demand the federal government return to the principles of the founding document and stop imposing mandates on the states in violation of the Tenth Amendment and the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. They have consistently defended the Bill of Rights against the tyrannical actions of both the Republicans and Democrats.
The SPLC and its ideological twin, the Anti-Defamation League, are engaged in a desperate effort to silence the patriot movement through baseless and slanderous accusations. It will not work. Millions of Americans have arrived at the conclusion that the federal government is indeed an authoritarian leviathan. In response, increasing numbers support the Tea Party movement and other patriot groups.
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Sen. Hinkle letter: Wolves as disease carriers
Friday, March 05 2010 @ 03:48 PM MST
Sen. Greg Hinkle submitted the following letter to be read at the March 2, 2010 meeting of the Environmental Quality Council.
Environmental Quality Council
Representative Chas Vincent, Chair
P.O. Box 201704
Helena, Mt. 59620-1704
Re: Wolf as disease carriers
Dear Representative Vincent and members of the Council,
I have reviewed the documents before this Council on the spread of Hydatid Disease via the wolf. In addition to this, I have reviewed information from the Center of Disease Control (CDC) and studies by renowned wildlife biologist Dr. Valerius Geist, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Science at the University of Calgary. You have seen his comments in an email dated February 28, 2010 titled, “EQC and wolves/wolf diseases”.
You have information indicating that almost two-thirds of the wolves in Montana are carriers of the Hydatid Tapeworm and are contaminating our landscape with the eggs of this worm. We have a much milder climate in Montana than in the Far North and it appears this will contribute to a more prevalent spread of the disease. You have read Dr. Geists comments on how easily humans can come in contact with the eggs through pets and wildlife where deer or elk are intermediate hosts contributing to the spread of the disease. The seriousness of this contamination of the landscape can not be understated or denied.
In a fact sheet published by the CDC on Echinococossis it is stated, in part, that a person can become infected “by directly ingesting food items contaminated with stool (or eggs) from foxes, coyotes (wolves). This might include grass, herbs, greens, or berries gathered in fields.” Considering the number of wolves in western Montana, to what extent is the probability of wild berries being contaminated?
I have a copy of a letter written to Ed Bangs, Wolf Specialist with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) dated October 3, 1993 from Will N. Graves (Gray Wolf EIS). In that letter, Mr. Graves pointed out the fact that wolves of the north were Hydatid carriers and should not be introduced into the United States by the USFWS. This dated letter was prior to the introduction program; therefore, was the warning ignored or disregarded by Mr. Bangs?
The Montana Constitution in Article IX, Section 1 guarantees every Montanan the unalienable right to a clean and healthy environment; that the legislature will administer and enforce this duty; and that “the legislature shall provide adequate remedies for the protection of the environmental life support system from degradation and provide adequate remedies to prevent unreasonable depletion and degradation of natural resources.”
The expansion of the wolf population enhanced by foreign wolves is virtually wiping out western Montana’s big game herds. I know that from personal observations and those of other outdoorsmen.
I would point out that in a US Supreme Court case; Printz v. United States, 95-1503; the Court referred to a previous case; New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992); and they stated in Printz, “The Federal government”, we held, “may not compel the States to enact or administer a federal regulatory program”, Id., at188. This begs the question, in my mind; did the USFWS have the authority to contaminate our environment with diseased wolves?
Where do we go from here? I believe there are some options.
First would be to request that the Attorney General of Montana fully investigate whether Mr. Bangs and the USFWS knew of the potential of bringing diseased wolves from a foreign country into the State. If this is found to be true, the State should sue USFWS for violating our Constitutional guarantee to a clean and healthful environment.
Second, we should immediately begin to eradicate the source of the problem. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP) should make available an unlimited number of wolf tags and open the season year round. They should educate all hunters on the potential hazard of handling a wolf (or coyote). The funds from the wolf tags should be divided up and all those who harvest a wolf at the end of each calendar year will receive a payment for each wolf harvested. Yes, it is called a bounty. Thirdly, due to deer and elk being intermediate hosts of the disease, FWP should immediately enforce the prohibition on the feeding of ungulates. Illegal feeding concentrates deer and elk creating a hazard for everyone. Other than that, what other sound options are there to hold the spread of this disease in check?
Sincerely,
Senator Greg Hinkle
Greg Hinkle represents Senate District 7, which includes western Missoula County and all of Mineral County.
Trackback
Trackback URL for this entry: http://www.clarkforkchronicle.com/trackback.php/20100305154807190
Sen. Greg Hinkle submitted the following letter to be read at the March 2, 2010 meeting of the Environmental Quality Council.
Environmental Quality Council
Representative Chas Vincent, Chair
P.O. Box 201704
Helena, Mt. 59620-1704
Re: Wolf as disease carriers
Dear Representative Vincent and members of the Council,
I have reviewed the documents before this Council on the spread of Hydatid Disease via the wolf. In addition to this, I have reviewed information from the Center of Disease Control (CDC) and studies by renowned wildlife biologist Dr. Valerius Geist, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Science at the University of Calgary. You have seen his comments in an email dated February 28, 2010 titled, “EQC and wolves/wolf diseases”.
You have information indicating that almost two-thirds of the wolves in Montana are carriers of the Hydatid Tapeworm and are contaminating our landscape with the eggs of this worm. We have a much milder climate in Montana than in the Far North and it appears this will contribute to a more prevalent spread of the disease. You have read Dr. Geists comments on how easily humans can come in contact with the eggs through pets and wildlife where deer or elk are intermediate hosts contributing to the spread of the disease. The seriousness of this contamination of the landscape can not be understated or denied.
In a fact sheet published by the CDC on Echinococossis it is stated, in part, that a person can become infected “by directly ingesting food items contaminated with stool (or eggs) from foxes, coyotes (wolves). This might include grass, herbs, greens, or berries gathered in fields.” Considering the number of wolves in western Montana, to what extent is the probability of wild berries being contaminated?
I have a copy of a letter written to Ed Bangs, Wolf Specialist with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) dated October 3, 1993 from Will N. Graves (Gray Wolf EIS). In that letter, Mr. Graves pointed out the fact that wolves of the north were Hydatid carriers and should not be introduced into the United States by the USFWS. This dated letter was prior to the introduction program; therefore, was the warning ignored or disregarded by Mr. Bangs?
The Montana Constitution in Article IX, Section 1 guarantees every Montanan the unalienable right to a clean and healthy environment; that the legislature will administer and enforce this duty; and that “the legislature shall provide adequate remedies for the protection of the environmental life support system from degradation and provide adequate remedies to prevent unreasonable depletion and degradation of natural resources.”
The expansion of the wolf population enhanced by foreign wolves is virtually wiping out western Montana’s big game herds. I know that from personal observations and those of other outdoorsmen.
I would point out that in a US Supreme Court case; Printz v. United States, 95-1503; the Court referred to a previous case; New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992); and they stated in Printz, “The Federal government”, we held, “may not compel the States to enact or administer a federal regulatory program”, Id., at188. This begs the question, in my mind; did the USFWS have the authority to contaminate our environment with diseased wolves?
Where do we go from here? I believe there are some options.
First would be to request that the Attorney General of Montana fully investigate whether Mr. Bangs and the USFWS knew of the potential of bringing diseased wolves from a foreign country into the State. If this is found to be true, the State should sue USFWS for violating our Constitutional guarantee to a clean and healthful environment.
Second, we should immediately begin to eradicate the source of the problem. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP) should make available an unlimited number of wolf tags and open the season year round. They should educate all hunters on the potential hazard of handling a wolf (or coyote). The funds from the wolf tags should be divided up and all those who harvest a wolf at the end of each calendar year will receive a payment for each wolf harvested. Yes, it is called a bounty. Thirdly, due to deer and elk being intermediate hosts of the disease, FWP should immediately enforce the prohibition on the feeding of ungulates. Illegal feeding concentrates deer and elk creating a hazard for everyone. Other than that, what other sound options are there to hold the spread of this disease in check?
Sincerely,
Senator Greg Hinkle
Greg Hinkle represents Senate District 7, which includes western Missoula County and all of Mineral County.
Trackback
Trackback URL for this entry: http://www.clarkforkchronicle.com/trackback.php/20100305154807190
MSNBC finally tells the truth about the FED
I never thought I would see something like this on national television, let alone MSNBC!
Is this guy trying to be the Glenn Beck of MSNBC??
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/36233217#36233217
Is this guy trying to be the Glenn Beck of MSNBC??
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/36233217#36233217
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Dmitry Orlov: Social Collapse Best Practices
Do you really want to go where this guy talks about?
I don't!
Does the Russian model of survival sound appealing to you?
It's coming and Agenda 21 from the UN wants us all stacked up on top of each other.
http://fora.tv/2009/02/13/Dmitry_Orlov_Social_Collapse_Best_Practices
I don't!
Does the Russian model of survival sound appealing to you?
It's coming and Agenda 21 from the UN wants us all stacked up on top of each other.
http://fora.tv/2009/02/13/Dmitry_Orlov_Social_Collapse_Best_Practices
Tea Party gatherings to be incited to violence by leftist agitators!
This is absolutely hilarious for me. The radical left is so desperate for support that they have to advertise on the internet to find people to infiltrate the Tea Party movement.
http://www.resistnet.com/forum/topics/latest-on-crashtheteapartyorg
They only know their Alinsky radical methods of lies and polarization like they used in the race riots of the 60s.
THEY CAN'T ARGUE THE ISSUES AND WIN, so they try to demonize the messenger in any way they can. And they always accuse the opposition of exactly what they themselves are guilty, because that is all they know.
This is one reason I am focusing on using video production and duplication as our most effective weapon in the information war for truth. Liars hate the light of truth because it makes their lies ineffective when they fall on the deaf ears of the informed mind.
We need to capture the minds and hearts of the people on the street first, then we can put to route the few radical peace destroyers like the ones who advocate the infiltration of the demonstrations of the Tea Parties.
They want you to turn violent. They want to taunt you into punching them in the nose.
DON'T FALL FOR IT. They want nothing more than to have an excuse to demonize law abiding people, start their war in the streets, and use it as an excuse to declare "Martial Law".
At the next LCW meeting on the 17th Ginny will pass out some free copies of some new videos that you all need to see and spread around. I will be in Billings at the gun show passing out the same videos. These sample copies are masters that you can duplicate if you have the means, but see below for the best way.
These are critical videos, starting with "Rex Nichols, The People's Sheriff", and then our new "The Problem and the Solution from the Peacemakers", and another video made by Red Beckman entitled "Know your Rights", on the jury are the tools we will use to make Lincoln County Montana the first truly free county in the country in decades, and when this works people will flock here to be a part of it.
There is no chance for the Alinsky methods of disruption to work when people are watching these in their own homes.
I have sold my classic 1976 Lincoln Mark IV and used some of the money to buy a commercial quality, DVD tower duplication machine that makes 7 copies of a full 97 minute DVD in about 10 minutes.
I have ordered in 1000 blank disks, and sleeves, and will be running that machine every day until our county and state are blanketed with thousands of copies of these three very important videos.
Thanks to Kevin and Dianna of Libby Video for doing the editing on these and giving us one of the most important sets of tools we have ever used in this fight for Freedom and Liberty. Go look at their website at http://www.libbyvideo.com/
The most important thing I can ask you to do right now is to help us set up distribution channels for these DVD movies. To recover costs on a continuous basis I will need to charge only one dollar per video to keep it going. The DVD will come in a white sheath with a label on the outside. They are the type of disk that can only be written to one time, so nobody will be able to erase or overwrite them.
The $1 price is for any quantity, and I will have to charge some shipping if I am to mail them. In quantities of 500 I will pay the shipping myself.
This is probably the most important project I have ever undertaken, only made possible by today's modern electronics technology, and your continued attendance at our meetings as you will see when you watch the videos. Thank you for your dedication, and contact me next week for videos and more info.
Paul Stramer
P.O. Box 116
Eureka Montana 59917
800 889 2839
pstramer@eurekadsl.net
Skype: pstramer
blog http://www.paulstramer.net/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
http://www.resistnet.com/forum/topics/latest-on-crashtheteapartyorg
They only know their Alinsky radical methods of lies and polarization like they used in the race riots of the 60s.
THEY CAN'T ARGUE THE ISSUES AND WIN, so they try to demonize the messenger in any way they can. And they always accuse the opposition of exactly what they themselves are guilty, because that is all they know.
This is one reason I am focusing on using video production and duplication as our most effective weapon in the information war for truth. Liars hate the light of truth because it makes their lies ineffective when they fall on the deaf ears of the informed mind.
We need to capture the minds and hearts of the people on the street first, then we can put to route the few radical peace destroyers like the ones who advocate the infiltration of the demonstrations of the Tea Parties.
They want you to turn violent. They want to taunt you into punching them in the nose.
DON'T FALL FOR IT. They want nothing more than to have an excuse to demonize law abiding people, start their war in the streets, and use it as an excuse to declare "Martial Law".
At the next LCW meeting on the 17th Ginny will pass out some free copies of some new videos that you all need to see and spread around. I will be in Billings at the gun show passing out the same videos. These sample copies are masters that you can duplicate if you have the means, but see below for the best way.
These are critical videos, starting with "Rex Nichols, The People's Sheriff", and then our new "The Problem and the Solution from the Peacemakers", and another video made by Red Beckman entitled "Know your Rights", on the jury are the tools we will use to make Lincoln County Montana the first truly free county in the country in decades, and when this works people will flock here to be a part of it.
There is no chance for the Alinsky methods of disruption to work when people are watching these in their own homes.
I have sold my classic 1976 Lincoln Mark IV and used some of the money to buy a commercial quality, DVD tower duplication machine that makes 7 copies of a full 97 minute DVD in about 10 minutes.
I have ordered in 1000 blank disks, and sleeves, and will be running that machine every day until our county and state are blanketed with thousands of copies of these three very important videos.
Thanks to Kevin and Dianna of Libby Video for doing the editing on these and giving us one of the most important sets of tools we have ever used in this fight for Freedom and Liberty. Go look at their website at http://www.libbyvideo.com/
The most important thing I can ask you to do right now is to help us set up distribution channels for these DVD movies. To recover costs on a continuous basis I will need to charge only one dollar per video to keep it going. The DVD will come in a white sheath with a label on the outside. They are the type of disk that can only be written to one time, so nobody will be able to erase or overwrite them.
The $1 price is for any quantity, and I will have to charge some shipping if I am to mail them. In quantities of 500 I will pay the shipping myself.
This is probably the most important project I have ever undertaken, only made possible by today's modern electronics technology, and your continued attendance at our meetings as you will see when you watch the videos. Thank you for your dedication, and contact me next week for videos and more info.
Paul Stramer
P.O. Box 116
Eureka Montana 59917
800 889 2839
pstramer@eurekadsl.net
Skype: pstramer
blog http://www.paulstramer.net/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Monday, April 12, 2010
Exposing the global financial meltdown - What to Do?
An Argentine opinion on the Global Financial Crisis, describing the whole Global Financial System as one vast Ponzi Scheme. Like a pyramid, it has four sides and is a predictable model. The four sides are: (1) Artificially control the supply of public State-issued Currency, (2) Artificially impose Banking Money as the primary source of funding in the economy, (3) Promote doing everything by Debt and (4) Erect complex channels that allow privatizing profits when the Model is in expansion mode and socialize losses when the model goes into contraction mode.
How will the Global Financial Collapse end? Are we on the way towards global war and world government?
I have been telling everyone for 2 years now to GET OUT OF THE BANKS!
Don't leave any "money" in any bank that there has not been a check written on. Don't leave any wealth that is not being used to pay bills in any kind of bank or credit union because you will lose on it daily.
Get out of the bank and get Silver or some other asset that is real, like food, or guns and ammo, or garden seeds, or fuel, or the dry goods you use every day and you know you will need. Those are the items that really become valuable during a currency crisis.
To get silver: http://www.teapartysilver.com/
To Earn silver: http://www.silversnowball.net/
To get Radio communications for emergencies: http://www.fm2way.com/
How will the Global Financial Collapse end? Are we on the way towards global war and world government?
I have been telling everyone for 2 years now to GET OUT OF THE BANKS!
Don't leave any "money" in any bank that there has not been a check written on. Don't leave any wealth that is not being used to pay bills in any kind of bank or credit union because you will lose on it daily.
Get out of the bank and get Silver or some other asset that is real, like food, or guns and ammo, or garden seeds, or fuel, or the dry goods you use every day and you know you will need. Those are the items that really become valuable during a currency crisis.
To get silver: http://www.teapartysilver.com/
To Earn silver: http://www.silversnowball.net/
To get Radio communications for emergencies: http://www.fm2way.com/
Colonel Allen West Answers a Marine's Question about Islam
The question of Muslim terror was never so succinctly answered as here by Allen West. (Courtesy of The Hudson Institute's Reclaim American Liberty Conference).
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Tea Party Politics - The Great Spoiler and pain in the posterier.
Perhaps Gary North's Best Article ever!
Hip-Pocket Politics: How To Become a Tack
"If you are in the hip pocket of any political party, prepare to be sat on." ~ Gary North
Political victory in the United States is best defined as follows:
Getting your political agenda enacted into law, enforced by the Executive branch, and upheld by the courts.
A definition of political victory that ignores any of these criteria is part of a shell game: getting people elected for their careers' sake, not your agenda.
To achieve this three-part victory, you must be part of a voting bloc that has the power to impose sanctions: positive and negative.
Establishment politicians understand this. They respect it. They have learned to exploit it. They tell their constituents: "You can win through me if you supply the votes to enable me to win (positive sanction) at the expense of my opponent (negative sanction)." This is the politics of the shell game, what I call the Punch and Judy show.
The correct definition of the power to impose political sanctions is this:
Sufficient votes to deliberately keep your party's candidate from winning in November if he waffles, and sufficient votes to elect his replacement two years later.
There is a corollary:
The willingness to run a post-nomination independent candidate against an incumbent member of your party if he has waffled during his most recent term in office.
Any voting bloc that has this ability will not be in any party's hip pocket.
Read More: http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north833.html
Hip-Pocket Politics: How To Become a Tack
"If you are in the hip pocket of any political party, prepare to be sat on." ~ Gary North
Political victory in the United States is best defined as follows:
Getting your political agenda enacted into law, enforced by the Executive branch, and upheld by the courts.
A definition of political victory that ignores any of these criteria is part of a shell game: getting people elected for their careers' sake, not your agenda.
To achieve this three-part victory, you must be part of a voting bloc that has the power to impose sanctions: positive and negative.
Establishment politicians understand this. They respect it. They have learned to exploit it. They tell their constituents: "You can win through me if you supply the votes to enable me to win (positive sanction) at the expense of my opponent (negative sanction)." This is the politics of the shell game, what I call the Punch and Judy show.
The correct definition of the power to impose political sanctions is this:
Sufficient votes to deliberately keep your party's candidate from winning in November if he waffles, and sufficient votes to elect his replacement two years later.
There is a corollary:
The willingness to run a post-nomination independent candidate against an incumbent member of your party if he has waffled during his most recent term in office.
Any voting bloc that has this ability will not be in any party's hip pocket.
Read More: http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north833.html
INSTRUCTION ON THE FIRST SUNDAY AFTER EASTER
Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's
The Church's Year 1875
Why is this Sunday called Dominica in Albis or White Sunday?
Because on this day the neophytes laid aside the white dress which, as emblem of their innocence, they received on Holy Saturday, and put on their necks an Agnus Dei, made of white wax, and blessed by the pope, to remind them always of the innocence for which they were given, and of the meekness of the Lamb Jesus. For which reason the Church sings at the Introit:
INTROIT As newborn babes, alleluia: desire the rational milk without guile. Alleluia, alleluia, alleluia. (I Pet II. 2.) Rejoice to God our helper: sing aloud to the God of Jacob. (Ps. LXXX.) Glory, &c.
COLLECT Grant, we beseech Thee, Almighty God, that we, who have completed the paschal solemnities may, through Thy merciful bounty, ever retain them in our life and conversation. Through.
EPISTLE (I John V. 4-100.) Dearly Beloved, Whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world; and this is the victory which overcometh the world, our faith. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God? This is he that came by water and blood, Jesus Christ: not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the spirit which testifieth that Christ is the truth. And there are three who give testimony in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that give testimony on earth: the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three are one. If we receive the testimony of men, the testimony of God is greater: for this is the testimony of God, which is greater, because he hath testified of his Son. He that believeth in the Son of God, hath the testimony of God in himself.
INSTRUCTION As in his gospel, so in his epistles, and especially in this, St. John proves the divinity of Christ which had been denied by some heretics. He says that Christ had come to purify all men from sin by water and blood, that is, by His blood shed on the cross for our reconciliation, and by the water of baptism to which He has given the power, the divine effect of His blood, and has thus proved Himself the divine Redeemer. This His divine dignity is attested by the Holy Ghost who lived in Christ and worked through Him with His fulness, and when sent by Him after our Lord's Ascension, produced most wonderful effect in the apostles and the faithful. As now on earth three, the Spirit, water, and blood, give testimony of Christ's divinity and agree in it, so also in heaven three, the Father, who calls Him His beloved Son, (Matt, III. 17.) the Word, or the Son Himself, who wrought so many miracles, the Holy Ghost, when He descended upon Him at the baptism in the Jordan, (Luke III. 22.) give testimony of His divinity, and these also agree with one another in their testimony. If Christ is truly God, then we must believe in Him, and this faith must be a living one, that is, it must prove fertile in good works, and this faith conquers the world by teaching us to love God above all, to despise the world with its pleasures, and to overcome it by indifference. Let us strive to have such faith, and we shall overcome all temptations and gain the eternal crown.
ASPIRATION O Lord Jesus! strengthen me by a lively faith in Thy divinity, so that I may not succumb in the spiritual combat against the world, the flesh, and the devil, and be eternally lost.
GOSPEL (John XX. 1931.) At that time, When it was late that same day, the first of the week and the doors were shut,where the disciples were gathered together, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came, and stood in the midst, and said to them: Peace be to you. And when he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. The disciples therefore were glad, when, they saw the Lord. He said therefore to them again: Peace be to you. As the Father hath sent me, I also send you. When he had said this, he breathed on them; and he said to them: Receive ye the Holy Ghost; whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them: and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained. Now Thomas, one of the twelve, who is called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came. The other disciples therefore said to him: We have seen the Lord. But he said to them: Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the place of the nails, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe. And after eight days, again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them. Jesus cometh, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said: Peace be to you. Then he said to Thomas: Put in thy finger hither, and see my hands, and bring hither thy hand, and put it into my side; and be not faithless, but believing. Thomas answered and said to him: My Lord and my God. Jesus saith to him: Because thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and have believed.* Many other signs also did Jesus in the sight of his disciples, which are not written in this book. But these are written, that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that, believing, you may have life in his name.
Why does Christ so often wish peace to the apostles?
To show that He only, by His death and resurrection, has made peace between God and man, and that His followers should be known by their harmony. (John XIII. 35.) There is a threefold peace: peace with God, by avoiding sin; peace with ourselves, that is, a good conscience; peace with our neighbor, by the exercise of charity. This threefold peace is necessary for our salvation.
Why did Jesus breathe upon the apostles when giving them the power to forgive sin?
To show that as bodily life was once given to Adam by the breath of God, so should the spiritual life be given henceforth by the apostles and their successors, through the Holy Ghost in the Sacrament of Penance, to the children of Adam who were spiritually dead.
Why did God permit Thomas to doubt the Resurrection of Christ?
That Thomas, as well as we, says St. Gregory, should be strengthened in humble belief in the Resurrection of Christ, and that all doubts should be removed.
Had Thomas true faith when with his own eyes he saw Christ?
Yes, for he saw Christ only in His humanity, and yet testified to His divinity by exclaiming: My Lord and my God!
Is it true, meritorious faith not to be ready to believe before seeing that which is to be believed?
By no means; for faith consists precisely in firmly holding as true that which is not seen. Therefore Christ calls him blessed who has not seen and yet believes.
When is faith true and meritorious?
That is true faith which firmly believes and does all that God has revealed, whether written or unwritten, and when one lives in accordance with that faith; for faith in Jesus simply does not save us, when that which He has commanded is not performed. (Matt VII, 21.; James II. 20.) That faith is meritorious which without doubting and without hesitation willingly submits the understanding to revealed truths which it cannot comprehend, and this for the love of Gods who is eternal truth and cannot deceive.
Whence do we know for certain that God has revealed certain things?
From the Church of Christ which alone preserves the revealed word of God faithfully and uncorrupted, as it is contained in the Bible and in tradition; by the Holy Ghost all truth is given to the Church, and Christ remains with her until the end of the world. (Matt. XXVIII. 20.)
Has the Church of Christ any marks by which it may be known?
Christ's Church has these four marks: it is One, it is Holy, it is Catholic, and it is Apostolic.
How is the, Church one?
The Church is one, because all its members agreein one faith, are all in one communion, and are all under one head. (Matt. XVI, 18.; Eph. IV. 37.)
How is the Church Holy?
The Church is Holy, in her Founder, Jesus Christ, and by teaching a holy doctrine, by inviting all to a holy life, and by the eminent holiness of so many thousands of her children.
How is the Church Catholic?
The Church is Catholic or Universal, because she subsists in all ages, teaches all nations, (Matt. XXVII. 19, 20.) and maintains all truth.
How is the Church Apostolic?
The Church is Apostolic, because she comes down by a perpetual succession from the apostles of Christ, and has her doctrines her orders, and her mission from them.
Which is this true Church?
The Roman Catholic Church, for she alone has these marks. She is One in her head, the Pope of Rome, in her doctrine, and in her Sacraments, which is evident since she excludes all those who do not accept all her dogmas. She is. Holy, for Christ her Founder is holy; and her doctrine and Sacraments lead to holiness, as shown by the multitude of her saints whose sanctity God arms by great miracles. No sect has saints. She is Catholic or Universal, for she has been in existence always from the times of the apostles, as is clearly shown by the fact that from the times of the apostles there have always been some who separated from her and founded sects. The Catholic Church has always existed, and cannot perish or become corrupt, since Christ has promised to remain with her to the end of the world; she is also spread over the whole world, is always being announced to all nations, and is fitted for all generations and for all people. She is Apostolic, for she accepts no doctrine which does not come from the apostles, and she can prove that the ministers of the Church, the bishops, have come down in unbroken succession from the apostles.
Can those who remain outside the Catholic Church be, saved?
The Council of Trent (Sess. V. in the Introduction) assigns the Catholic faith as the one without which it is impossible to please God, and the Roman Catechism teaches: (I part. art. 9.) "The Church is also called Catholic or Universal, because all who desire eternal salvation must cling to, and embrace her, like those who entered the ark to escape perishing in the flood." According to this doctrine of the Church, which the holy Fathers affirm, only those idolaters and obstinate heretics are excluded from salvation who knowingly deny the truth, and will not enter the Church. The Catholic Church does not condemn the unbelievers, she prays for them, leaves judgment to the Lord, who alone knows the heart, and knows whether the error is culpable or not, and she calls on all her, members to pray for their enlightenment.
Are we then already saved, if we belong to the true Church?
No, we must also live up to the faith which she teaches make good use of all means of salvation, regard and honor all her regulations and commands, for otherwise the words of Christ will be verified in us: And I say to you that many shall come from the east and the west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven: but the children of the kingdom (the true Church) shall be cast out into exterior darkness. (Matt. VIII. 11.)
The Church's Year 1875
Why is this Sunday called Dominica in Albis or White Sunday?
Because on this day the neophytes laid aside the white dress which, as emblem of their innocence, they received on Holy Saturday, and put on their necks an Agnus Dei, made of white wax, and blessed by the pope, to remind them always of the innocence for which they were given, and of the meekness of the Lamb Jesus. For which reason the Church sings at the Introit:
INTROIT As newborn babes, alleluia: desire the rational milk without guile. Alleluia, alleluia, alleluia. (I Pet II. 2.) Rejoice to God our helper: sing aloud to the God of Jacob. (Ps. LXXX.) Glory, &c.
COLLECT Grant, we beseech Thee, Almighty God, that we, who have completed the paschal solemnities may, through Thy merciful bounty, ever retain them in our life and conversation. Through.
EPISTLE (I John V. 4-100.) Dearly Beloved, Whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world; and this is the victory which overcometh the world, our faith. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God? This is he that came by water and blood, Jesus Christ: not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the spirit which testifieth that Christ is the truth. And there are three who give testimony in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that give testimony on earth: the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three are one. If we receive the testimony of men, the testimony of God is greater: for this is the testimony of God, which is greater, because he hath testified of his Son. He that believeth in the Son of God, hath the testimony of God in himself.
INSTRUCTION As in his gospel, so in his epistles, and especially in this, St. John proves the divinity of Christ which had been denied by some heretics. He says that Christ had come to purify all men from sin by water and blood, that is, by His blood shed on the cross for our reconciliation, and by the water of baptism to which He has given the power, the divine effect of His blood, and has thus proved Himself the divine Redeemer. This His divine dignity is attested by the Holy Ghost who lived in Christ and worked through Him with His fulness, and when sent by Him after our Lord's Ascension, produced most wonderful effect in the apostles and the faithful. As now on earth three, the Spirit, water, and blood, give testimony of Christ's divinity and agree in it, so also in heaven three, the Father, who calls Him His beloved Son, (Matt, III. 17.) the Word, or the Son Himself, who wrought so many miracles, the Holy Ghost, when He descended upon Him at the baptism in the Jordan, (Luke III. 22.) give testimony of His divinity, and these also agree with one another in their testimony. If Christ is truly God, then we must believe in Him, and this faith must be a living one, that is, it must prove fertile in good works, and this faith conquers the world by teaching us to love God above all, to despise the world with its pleasures, and to overcome it by indifference. Let us strive to have such faith, and we shall overcome all temptations and gain the eternal crown.
ASPIRATION O Lord Jesus! strengthen me by a lively faith in Thy divinity, so that I may not succumb in the spiritual combat against the world, the flesh, and the devil, and be eternally lost.
GOSPEL (John XX. 1931.) At that time, When it was late that same day, the first of the week and the doors were shut,where the disciples were gathered together, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came, and stood in the midst, and said to them: Peace be to you. And when he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. The disciples therefore were glad, when, they saw the Lord. He said therefore to them again: Peace be to you. As the Father hath sent me, I also send you. When he had said this, he breathed on them; and he said to them: Receive ye the Holy Ghost; whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them: and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained. Now Thomas, one of the twelve, who is called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came. The other disciples therefore said to him: We have seen the Lord. But he said to them: Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the place of the nails, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe. And after eight days, again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them. Jesus cometh, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said: Peace be to you. Then he said to Thomas: Put in thy finger hither, and see my hands, and bring hither thy hand, and put it into my side; and be not faithless, but believing. Thomas answered and said to him: My Lord and my God. Jesus saith to him: Because thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and have believed.* Many other signs also did Jesus in the sight of his disciples, which are not written in this book. But these are written, that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that, believing, you may have life in his name.
Why does Christ so often wish peace to the apostles?
To show that He only, by His death and resurrection, has made peace between God and man, and that His followers should be known by their harmony. (John XIII. 35.) There is a threefold peace: peace with God, by avoiding sin; peace with ourselves, that is, a good conscience; peace with our neighbor, by the exercise of charity. This threefold peace is necessary for our salvation.
Why did Jesus breathe upon the apostles when giving them the power to forgive sin?
To show that as bodily life was once given to Adam by the breath of God, so should the spiritual life be given henceforth by the apostles and their successors, through the Holy Ghost in the Sacrament of Penance, to the children of Adam who were spiritually dead.
Why did God permit Thomas to doubt the Resurrection of Christ?
That Thomas, as well as we, says St. Gregory, should be strengthened in humble belief in the Resurrection of Christ, and that all doubts should be removed.
Had Thomas true faith when with his own eyes he saw Christ?
Yes, for he saw Christ only in His humanity, and yet testified to His divinity by exclaiming: My Lord and my God!
Is it true, meritorious faith not to be ready to believe before seeing that which is to be believed?
By no means; for faith consists precisely in firmly holding as true that which is not seen. Therefore Christ calls him blessed who has not seen and yet believes.
When is faith true and meritorious?
That is true faith which firmly believes and does all that God has revealed, whether written or unwritten, and when one lives in accordance with that faith; for faith in Jesus simply does not save us, when that which He has commanded is not performed. (Matt VII, 21.; James II. 20.) That faith is meritorious which without doubting and without hesitation willingly submits the understanding to revealed truths which it cannot comprehend, and this for the love of Gods who is eternal truth and cannot deceive.
Whence do we know for certain that God has revealed certain things?
From the Church of Christ which alone preserves the revealed word of God faithfully and uncorrupted, as it is contained in the Bible and in tradition; by the Holy Ghost all truth is given to the Church, and Christ remains with her until the end of the world. (Matt. XXVIII. 20.)
Has the Church of Christ any marks by which it may be known?
Christ's Church has these four marks: it is One, it is Holy, it is Catholic, and it is Apostolic.
How is the, Church one?
The Church is one, because all its members agreein one faith, are all in one communion, and are all under one head. (Matt. XVI, 18.; Eph. IV. 37.)
How is the Church Holy?
The Church is Holy, in her Founder, Jesus Christ, and by teaching a holy doctrine, by inviting all to a holy life, and by the eminent holiness of so many thousands of her children.
How is the Church Catholic?
The Church is Catholic or Universal, because she subsists in all ages, teaches all nations, (Matt. XXVII. 19, 20.) and maintains all truth.
How is the Church Apostolic?
The Church is Apostolic, because she comes down by a perpetual succession from the apostles of Christ, and has her doctrines her orders, and her mission from them.
Which is this true Church?
The Roman Catholic Church, for she alone has these marks. She is One in her head, the Pope of Rome, in her doctrine, and in her Sacraments, which is evident since she excludes all those who do not accept all her dogmas. She is. Holy, for Christ her Founder is holy; and her doctrine and Sacraments lead to holiness, as shown by the multitude of her saints whose sanctity God arms by great miracles. No sect has saints. She is Catholic or Universal, for she has been in existence always from the times of the apostles, as is clearly shown by the fact that from the times of the apostles there have always been some who separated from her and founded sects. The Catholic Church has always existed, and cannot perish or become corrupt, since Christ has promised to remain with her to the end of the world; she is also spread over the whole world, is always being announced to all nations, and is fitted for all generations and for all people. She is Apostolic, for she accepts no doctrine which does not come from the apostles, and she can prove that the ministers of the Church, the bishops, have come down in unbroken succession from the apostles.
Can those who remain outside the Catholic Church be, saved?
The Council of Trent (Sess. V. in the Introduction) assigns the Catholic faith as the one without which it is impossible to please God, and the Roman Catechism teaches: (I part. art. 9.) "The Church is also called Catholic or Universal, because all who desire eternal salvation must cling to, and embrace her, like those who entered the ark to escape perishing in the flood." According to this doctrine of the Church, which the holy Fathers affirm, only those idolaters and obstinate heretics are excluded from salvation who knowingly deny the truth, and will not enter the Church. The Catholic Church does not condemn the unbelievers, she prays for them, leaves judgment to the Lord, who alone knows the heart, and knows whether the error is culpable or not, and she calls on all her, members to pray for their enlightenment.
Are we then already saved, if we belong to the true Church?
No, we must also live up to the faith which she teaches make good use of all means of salvation, regard and honor all her regulations and commands, for otherwise the words of Christ will be verified in us: And I say to you that many shall come from the east and the west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven: but the children of the kingdom (the true Church) shall be cast out into exterior darkness. (Matt. VIII. 11.)
Truth brings Tyranny for FIJA activists.
If this doesn't make you mad you need more Education about your rights.
FIJA activists harassed, threatened in Philadelphia
April 10, 9:53 AMLibertarian News ExaminerGarry Reed
News from the Liberterrain…
"If you get too close to me with that camera I'll take it out of your hand and ram it down your throat." –Law enforcement officer during a peaceful FIJA outreach event in Philadelphia.
See the article here:
http://www.examiner.com/x-26370-Libertarian-News-Examiner~y2010m4d10-FIJA-activists-harassed-threatened-in-Philadelphia
FIJA activists harassed, threatened in Philadelphia
April 10, 9:53 AMLibertarian News ExaminerGarry Reed
News from the Liberterrain…
"If you get too close to me with that camera I'll take it out of your hand and ram it down your throat." –Law enforcement officer during a peaceful FIJA outreach event in Philadelphia.
See the article here:
http://www.examiner.com/x-26370-Libertarian-News-Examiner~y2010m4d10-FIJA-activists-harassed-threatened-in-Philadelphia
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Saving Souls--Losing Freedom by Chuck Baldwin
Posted By: RumorMail
Date: Friday, 9-Apr-2010 14:36:
Chuck is considering running as Ron Paul's Running mate in 2012.
Saving Souls–Losing Freedom
One would have to be a blind man to not see that America is fast losing the fundamental principles of liberty upon which our once-great country was established. And, without a doubt, the single biggest reason for this decline is the lack of concern and effort on the part of today’s Christians and pastors to resist it.
All over America, when one approaches our pastors and church leaders with the obvious decay and ruination of constitutional government and Declaration principles taking place in our land today, the response flippantly comes back: “God hasn’t called me to do that; I’m supposed to win souls and that’s it.” (Or words to that effect.) As if the call to Gospel preaching, evangelism, and missionary endeavor negates our responsibility as citizens of a free land.
Of course, this call to “win souls” doesn’t interfere with these preachers’ golf games; it doesn’t interfere with their family vacations; it doesn’t interfere with their active membership in whatever local civic organization they happen to belong to; it doesn’t interfere with their hiring of a lawyer if they are falsely accused or defrauded; it doesn’t interfere with their invitations to celebrity politicians for special church recognition on patriotic holidays; it doesn’t interfere with them going to the polls to vote; it only seems to interfere when they are personally asked to take a stand in the gap for our country’s liberties. Then, all of a sudden, they haven’t been “called,” or “God will take care of it,” or “Jesus is coming soon,” or “Religion and politics don’t mix,” ad infinitum, ad nauseam.
Read more: http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin581.htm
---------------------------------------------
The only thing I can think of to add to this is a question.
What ever happened to the old dedication exhibited by priests and ministers that were not afraid to self-sacrifice their lives for God in a spirit of penance for the sins of men? Where is there any evidence of these men showing a likeness to Christ in their own lives? Where is there any imitation of Christ's virtues? It seems to me they are all too interested in the world and it's pleasures, and not in winning the souls of men to God. Until we all get that same spirit of penance and self-sacrifice and live by it, this country will never be restored.
God will continue to push mankind OFF THE FENCE. It's up to us which side of that fence we get off on. Remember that God does not tolerate the lukewarm. He told us he would "begin to vomit them out of his mouth". This is really a spiritual battle between good and evil, and until we recognize that and act accordingly we are doomed, at least as a country. Remember the bible story of Jonas. Once the king of Ninive understood what Jonas was saying, he caused all his countrymen to do penance for their sins, and God heard their prayers and saved their land. We need to imitate them.
Paul Stramer
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Date: Friday, 9-Apr-2010 14:36:
Chuck is considering running as Ron Paul's Running mate in 2012.
Saving Souls–Losing Freedom
One would have to be a blind man to not see that America is fast losing the fundamental principles of liberty upon which our once-great country was established. And, without a doubt, the single biggest reason for this decline is the lack of concern and effort on the part of today’s Christians and pastors to resist it.
All over America, when one approaches our pastors and church leaders with the obvious decay and ruination of constitutional government and Declaration principles taking place in our land today, the response flippantly comes back: “God hasn’t called me to do that; I’m supposed to win souls and that’s it.” (Or words to that effect.) As if the call to Gospel preaching, evangelism, and missionary endeavor negates our responsibility as citizens of a free land.
Of course, this call to “win souls” doesn’t interfere with these preachers’ golf games; it doesn’t interfere with their family vacations; it doesn’t interfere with their active membership in whatever local civic organization they happen to belong to; it doesn’t interfere with their hiring of a lawyer if they are falsely accused or defrauded; it doesn’t interfere with their invitations to celebrity politicians for special church recognition on patriotic holidays; it doesn’t interfere with them going to the polls to vote; it only seems to interfere when they are personally asked to take a stand in the gap for our country’s liberties. Then, all of a sudden, they haven’t been “called,” or “God will take care of it,” or “Jesus is coming soon,” or “Religion and politics don’t mix,” ad infinitum, ad nauseam.
Read more: http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin581.htm
---------------------------------------------
The only thing I can think of to add to this is a question.
What ever happened to the old dedication exhibited by priests and ministers that were not afraid to self-sacrifice their lives for God in a spirit of penance for the sins of men? Where is there any evidence of these men showing a likeness to Christ in their own lives? Where is there any imitation of Christ's virtues? It seems to me they are all too interested in the world and it's pleasures, and not in winning the souls of men to God. Until we all get that same spirit of penance and self-sacrifice and live by it, this country will never be restored.
God will continue to push mankind OFF THE FENCE. It's up to us which side of that fence we get off on. Remember that God does not tolerate the lukewarm. He told us he would "begin to vomit them out of his mouth". This is really a spiritual battle between good and evil, and until we recognize that and act accordingly we are doomed, at least as a country. Remember the bible story of Jonas. Once the king of Ninive understood what Jonas was saying, he caused all his countrymen to do penance for their sins, and God heard their prayers and saved their land. We need to imitate them.
Paul Stramer
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Thursday, April 8, 2010
Actual Letter sent to all the Governors on March 29, 2010
The unanimous Declaration of the sovereign People of the united States of America to restore and reinhabit the free American republics.
Delivered to the Governors of the 50 States March 29, 2010
We the People inhabiting the North American continent, free men and women convened under God, having been granted by the Creator dominion over all the earth, to restore the blessings of liberty for ourselves and the posterity, do hereby invoke our sacred right to alter or abolish destructive government as memorialized in The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, c. 1776 by declaring herewith this solemn declaration to the people of the earth and all governments and nations derived there from.
Whereas
institutions of this or any country, in particular the ill-gotten gains of foreclosure and fraudulent foreign taxation; peacefully eliminate all existing government structures, entities and agencies that have been derived from the de facto corporations posing as legitimate governments; issue orders to the military, police and corporate powers of the land and sea to enforce our divine rights to such lawful government as was already ensured by our constitutions; and restore de facto actors to lawful de jure capacity duly confined by the constitutions of the these republics and replace the noncompliant; thus restoring to each and every American their in-law, dry land, divine rights of birth and the fruits of their individual and ancestral labor as quickly, efficiently and discretely as possible, without causing undue alarm or stress and without malice for anyone forgive in the name of the Creator all who repent their political and economic misdeeds.
Read the whole letter here:
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/Declaration.pdf
Delivered to the Governors of the 50 States March 29, 2010
We the People inhabiting the North American continent, free men and women convened under God, having been granted by the Creator dominion over all the earth, to restore the blessings of liberty for ourselves and the posterity, do hereby invoke our sacred right to alter or abolish destructive government as memorialized in The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, c. 1776 by declaring herewith this solemn declaration to the people of the earth and all governments and nations derived there from.
Whereas
institutions of this or any country, in particular the ill-gotten gains of foreclosure and fraudulent foreign taxation; peacefully eliminate all existing government structures, entities and agencies that have been derived from the de facto corporations posing as legitimate governments; issue orders to the military, police and corporate powers of the land and sea to enforce our divine rights to such lawful government as was already ensured by our constitutions; and restore de facto actors to lawful de jure capacity duly confined by the constitutions of the these republics and replace the noncompliant; thus restoring to each and every American their in-law, dry land, divine rights of birth and the fruits of their individual and ancestral labor as quickly, efficiently and discretely as possible, without causing undue alarm or stress and without malice for anyone forgive in the name of the Creator all who repent their political and economic misdeeds.
Read the whole letter here:
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/Declaration.pdf
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Monday, April 5, 2010
Are Federal Officials Above the Law?
By Jacob Hornberger
Published 04/05/10 on Campaign for Liberty
A federal judge's ruling in a case challenging the Bush administration's infamous and illegal domestic surveillance case will likely demonstrate, once again, the hypocrisy and deceit of Barack Obama and his merry band of liberal statists.
When Obama was a presidential candidate, he emphasized to American voters that President Bush's warrantless surveillance of Americans was "unconstitutional and illegal."
But once Obama got into office, he silenced his tune, especially in lawsuits that were brought by victims of this criminal action. Like Bush's Justice Department, Obama's Justice Department took the position that people’s lawsuits should be dismissed on grounds of "national security" because, they said, if such cases were allowed to proceed, national-security secrets would be revealed.
Yeah, such secrets as the identities of federal agents who violated federal criminal statutes as well as the identities of the federal higher-ups who ordered them to do so! Can't you just see the entire nation collapsing if information like that were to be disclosed to the public?
How convenient is that? All one has to do to protect federal criminals is simply cite the magic term "national security" and all the criminal dirt is swept under the carpet. Too bad Richard Nixon and the other Watergate conspirators didn’t claim "national security" to keep their criminal wrongdoing secret. Or did they?
In any event, this week a federal judge in one of the surveillance cases declared Bush’s surveillance scheme unlawful, a ruling that places Barack Obama and his Justice Department in an interesting position.
Do they let the ruling stand? Doing so would be consistent with Obama's campaign position, which mirrored that of the judge.
Or do they appeal the ruling, thereby exposing, once again, the rank hypocrisy of the Obama administration?
Of course, all this is occurring in the context of a civil suit. The question with respect to the criminal-justice system is: Why isn't the Justice Department securing federal grand-jury indictments against federal officials who, everyone concedes, violated federal criminal statutes?
After all, the Justice Department is always overeager to enforce such stupid laws as antitrust, insider-trading, and possession and distribution of illicit drugs against the American people. Why do federal officials who committed felonies with an illegal surveillance program get a pass? Are federal officials considered better than ordinary Americans?
For once, the Obama administration should do the right thing. Not only should it not appeal the adverse ruling in the surveillance case, it should also take the side of all other victims of such illegal conduct, arguing that they are entitled to full relief in the courts. If Bush, Cheney, and any their cronies wish to intervene in such suits to defend their illegal scheme, so be it, but this would be a good place for Obama to finally begin breaking away from Bush's massive infringements on civil liberties.
Equally important, Obama's Justice Department should initiate a federal grand jury investigation into the entire illegal surveillance scheme, subpoenaing all the records of those who committed the offenses and all the records showing who was victimized. Grand jury indictments and federal criminal prosecutions should ensue. What better opportunity to show that no one, not even powerful and influential federal officials, is above the law?
Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation.
Published 04/05/10 on Campaign for Liberty
A federal judge's ruling in a case challenging the Bush administration's infamous and illegal domestic surveillance case will likely demonstrate, once again, the hypocrisy and deceit of Barack Obama and his merry band of liberal statists.
When Obama was a presidential candidate, he emphasized to American voters that President Bush's warrantless surveillance of Americans was "unconstitutional and illegal."
But once Obama got into office, he silenced his tune, especially in lawsuits that were brought by victims of this criminal action. Like Bush's Justice Department, Obama's Justice Department took the position that people’s lawsuits should be dismissed on grounds of "national security" because, they said, if such cases were allowed to proceed, national-security secrets would be revealed.
Yeah, such secrets as the identities of federal agents who violated federal criminal statutes as well as the identities of the federal higher-ups who ordered them to do so! Can't you just see the entire nation collapsing if information like that were to be disclosed to the public?
How convenient is that? All one has to do to protect federal criminals is simply cite the magic term "national security" and all the criminal dirt is swept under the carpet. Too bad Richard Nixon and the other Watergate conspirators didn’t claim "national security" to keep their criminal wrongdoing secret. Or did they?
In any event, this week a federal judge in one of the surveillance cases declared Bush’s surveillance scheme unlawful, a ruling that places Barack Obama and his Justice Department in an interesting position.
Do they let the ruling stand? Doing so would be consistent with Obama's campaign position, which mirrored that of the judge.
Or do they appeal the ruling, thereby exposing, once again, the rank hypocrisy of the Obama administration?
Of course, all this is occurring in the context of a civil suit. The question with respect to the criminal-justice system is: Why isn't the Justice Department securing federal grand-jury indictments against federal officials who, everyone concedes, violated federal criminal statutes?
After all, the Justice Department is always overeager to enforce such stupid laws as antitrust, insider-trading, and possession and distribution of illicit drugs against the American people. Why do federal officials who committed felonies with an illegal surveillance program get a pass? Are federal officials considered better than ordinary Americans?
For once, the Obama administration should do the right thing. Not only should it not appeal the adverse ruling in the surveillance case, it should also take the side of all other victims of such illegal conduct, arguing that they are entitled to full relief in the courts. If Bush, Cheney, and any their cronies wish to intervene in such suits to defend their illegal scheme, so be it, but this would be a good place for Obama to finally begin breaking away from Bush's massive infringements on civil liberties.
Equally important, Obama's Justice Department should initiate a federal grand jury investigation into the entire illegal surveillance scheme, subpoenaing all the records of those who committed the offenses and all the records showing who was victimized. Grand jury indictments and federal criminal prosecutions should ensue. What better opportunity to show that no one, not even powerful and influential federal officials, is above the law?
Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation.
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Thursday, April 1, 2010
WHAT ABOUT THE SECULAR MILITIA? Who are the "Militia"?
By Coach Dave Daubenmire
April 1, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
Call me Mr. Black Helicopter or try and write me off as a “conspiracy theorist” but something is really fishy about the recent arrest of the “Christian Militia” in Michigan. I have learned over the years that there is more to most stories than meets the eyes.
This is just too convenient for me. A few months ago we found out that our Department of Homeland Insecurity had determined that the greatest threat to America weren’t the “Hitler’s in Headscarves” (Thanks Dr. Savage), but Mom and Pop American’s who had the temerity to take their frustrations to the streets. The Tea-Party movement, although clearly spontaneously arising from the heartland, was the first sign of push back from patriotic Americans who were finally realizing that the United States Government was waging war against the freedoms of the United States citizens.
Janet Napolitano released a report informing her “officers” that those who were showing up at the Tea Parties were the folks who were most threatening to America. Perhaps she was referring to what Obama and his Czar’s have clearly deduced...the American people are a threat to the American government.
I watched throughout the Cap and Trade fiasco, followed by the August recess and the unwillingness of our elected officials to meet with those they represent, the loss of Ted Kennedy’s seat in Taxachusettes, the Louisiana Purchase, Cornhusker kickback, legislation by the highest bidder, several marches on Washington, to cries of “racism and violence” against those whom Secretary Napolitano had already warned us were the real terrorists.
CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and the deadstream media were frothing all over each other interviewing “dignitaries” who had been “threatened” and “called names” by the “right wing” Tea Party crowd. “If someone doesn’t do something this whole thing is going to turn violent,” the talking heads warned us.
Well right on cue, our friends at the FBI were able to break up a “right-wing” group of “Christian Militia” who were planning to “kill the police.” How convenient that the Feds were on the alert, staging the raid, poisoning public opinion, and proving Janet Napolitano to be a prophet.. We all know how violent those Christians are...allowing saliva to fly from their mouths when yelling at legislative larcenists. (Where is Kathleen Sebelius win we need her? Perhaps she could teach us how not to froth at the mouth when we are angry.) Something smells to me….and it ain't halitosis.
I have no idea who this “Christian” Militia is, but are they inferring that the “Christian” Militia is more dangerous than, say, the “Muslim” Militia?” I suppose Major Hasan at Ft. Hood wasn't part of any militia...just a good man bullied into violence. I guess actually killing soldiers is not nearly as bad as “threatening” to kill policeman. Just curious, have any of the members of Major Hasan's militia been arrested?
Let's be clear. Christian's don't kill cops. If this “militia” threatened to do so then they are not Christians, no matter how much DHS wishes they were.
Just what is a “Christian Militia?” According to the dictionary a militia is “a body of citizen soldiers as distinguished from professional soldiers.” What distinguishes a “Christian” militia from an “atheistic” militia, or a “patriot” militia, or better yet, a “state” militia. Would Secretary Napolitano speak the same way about the “Islamic” Militia carousing around the globe? Are we now to assume that this group arrested in Michigan is representative of all “Christians?” Would we get away with calling the gangs trolling our inner cities a “black” militia? (I smell Al Sharpton...er...a rat.) Somebody is being set up.
Call me paranoid, but I don’t like the direction this whole thing is heading. I think we have a lot more to fear from the Secular Militia who are destroying the soul of this nation. There is a civil war going on in this country, for sure. It is a war where Christianity is the enemy and words are the grenades. The Secular Militia are very well organized, fully financed, and embedded in every area of our society. Permit me to point them out to you.
One branch of the secular militia is the Southern Poverty Law Center Militia. The SPLC is the platoon in charge of determining what speech is protected and what speech is hateful.
The American Civil Liberties Union Militia is the legal arm of the Secular Militia. They are charged with tearing down any semblance of Christianity in America by threatening those who publicly practice it.
The National Education Association Militia is the educational branch of the Secular Militia who are following orders to rewrite the history of America, destroying the generational bond that ties families together.
The NAACP Militia is the racist SWAT team charged with digging trenches between Americans into which we all are eventually pushed.
Planned Parenthood Militia is the population police charged with keeping enlistments of certain people groups to a minimum, while lining the pockets of those who love death.
The National Council of Churches Militia is the special ops charged with infiltrating the seminaries of America and destroying the minds of the Christian leadership convincing them that God was the ultimate homophobe.
The Mainstream media Militia is the Tokyo Rose of the Secular Militia, charged with undermining every foundation upon which this nation was built and convincing us that clinging to our God and our Guns was old-fashioned and out of style.
Hollywood and the Screen Actors Guild Militia is a group of “don’t ask don’t tell” soldiers charged with undermining the morals of American children by changing the monogamous relationship into a sexual smorgasboard.
The National Bar Association Militia has assumed the duty of weakening American’s through the terrorism of “civil rights” lawsuits aimed at silencing the freedom of speech.
The Internal Revenue Service Militia is like the paratroopers that parachute in behind enemy lines to abscond with the allies resources and clamping a chain on churches who speak the Truth.
The National Organization For Women Militia are the WAC’s of the Secular Media charged with castration of the American male and the liberation of lion-like lesbians.
The GLESEN Militia has been given the mission of weakening this nation by blurring all gender roles and sexual morality and homosexualizing GI Joe
I could go on.
We are at war for this nation. It is a battle between those who fear the Lord and those who do not; Between those who believe Jesus is Lord and those who do not; Between those who think we work for the government and those who think the government should work for us.
It is clear that secular government has a militia and that they are determined to do all they can to squash the Christians. The war has already been declared. They aren’t fighting it with guns but with lies and intimidation.
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. Matt. 10:28
Americans have far more to fear from the Secular Militia than the “Christian” Militia. They are destroying this nation...one grenade at a time.
Order the CDs here: http://www.ptsalt.com/products
Do you think like a Christian or a humanist? Did the Founders really separate Church and State? Is Judicial tyranny ruining America? Check out these great teachings by the Coach
© 2010 Dave Daubenmire - All Rights Reserved
Coach Dave Daubenmire, founder and President of Pass The Salt Ministries www.ptsalt.com and Minutemen United www.minutemenunited.org, is host of the high octane Pass The Salt radio show heard in Columbus, Ohio.
In 1999 Coach Daubenmire was sued by the ACLU for praying with his teams while coaching high school in Ohio. He now spends his energy fighting for Christian principles in the public domain.
E-Mail: coach@ptsalt.com
See the whole article here: http://www.newswithviews.com/Daubenmire/dave189.htm
April 1, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
Call me Mr. Black Helicopter or try and write me off as a “conspiracy theorist” but something is really fishy about the recent arrest of the “Christian Militia” in Michigan. I have learned over the years that there is more to most stories than meets the eyes.
This is just too convenient for me. A few months ago we found out that our Department of Homeland Insecurity had determined that the greatest threat to America weren’t the “Hitler’s in Headscarves” (Thanks Dr. Savage), but Mom and Pop American’s who had the temerity to take their frustrations to the streets. The Tea-Party movement, although clearly spontaneously arising from the heartland, was the first sign of push back from patriotic Americans who were finally realizing that the United States Government was waging war against the freedoms of the United States citizens.
Janet Napolitano released a report informing her “officers” that those who were showing up at the Tea Parties were the folks who were most threatening to America. Perhaps she was referring to what Obama and his Czar’s have clearly deduced...the American people are a threat to the American government.
I watched throughout the Cap and Trade fiasco, followed by the August recess and the unwillingness of our elected officials to meet with those they represent, the loss of Ted Kennedy’s seat in Taxachusettes, the Louisiana Purchase, Cornhusker kickback, legislation by the highest bidder, several marches on Washington, to cries of “racism and violence” against those whom Secretary Napolitano had already warned us were the real terrorists.
CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and the deadstream media were frothing all over each other interviewing “dignitaries” who had been “threatened” and “called names” by the “right wing” Tea Party crowd. “If someone doesn’t do something this whole thing is going to turn violent,” the talking heads warned us.
Well right on cue, our friends at the FBI were able to break up a “right-wing” group of “Christian Militia” who were planning to “kill the police.” How convenient that the Feds were on the alert, staging the raid, poisoning public opinion, and proving Janet Napolitano to be a prophet.. We all know how violent those Christians are...allowing saliva to fly from their mouths when yelling at legislative larcenists. (Where is Kathleen Sebelius win we need her? Perhaps she could teach us how not to froth at the mouth when we are angry.) Something smells to me….and it ain't halitosis.
I have no idea who this “Christian” Militia is, but are they inferring that the “Christian” Militia is more dangerous than, say, the “Muslim” Militia?” I suppose Major Hasan at Ft. Hood wasn't part of any militia...just a good man bullied into violence. I guess actually killing soldiers is not nearly as bad as “threatening” to kill policeman. Just curious, have any of the members of Major Hasan's militia been arrested?
Let's be clear. Christian's don't kill cops. If this “militia” threatened to do so then they are not Christians, no matter how much DHS wishes they were.
Just what is a “Christian Militia?” According to the dictionary a militia is “a body of citizen soldiers as distinguished from professional soldiers.” What distinguishes a “Christian” militia from an “atheistic” militia, or a “patriot” militia, or better yet, a “state” militia. Would Secretary Napolitano speak the same way about the “Islamic” Militia carousing around the globe? Are we now to assume that this group arrested in Michigan is representative of all “Christians?” Would we get away with calling the gangs trolling our inner cities a “black” militia? (I smell Al Sharpton...er...a rat.) Somebody is being set up.
Call me paranoid, but I don’t like the direction this whole thing is heading. I think we have a lot more to fear from the Secular Militia who are destroying the soul of this nation. There is a civil war going on in this country, for sure. It is a war where Christianity is the enemy and words are the grenades. The Secular Militia are very well organized, fully financed, and embedded in every area of our society. Permit me to point them out to you.
One branch of the secular militia is the Southern Poverty Law Center Militia. The SPLC is the platoon in charge of determining what speech is protected and what speech is hateful.
The American Civil Liberties Union Militia is the legal arm of the Secular Militia. They are charged with tearing down any semblance of Christianity in America by threatening those who publicly practice it.
The National Education Association Militia is the educational branch of the Secular Militia who are following orders to rewrite the history of America, destroying the generational bond that ties families together.
The NAACP Militia is the racist SWAT team charged with digging trenches between Americans into which we all are eventually pushed.
Planned Parenthood Militia is the population police charged with keeping enlistments of certain people groups to a minimum, while lining the pockets of those who love death.
The National Council of Churches Militia is the special ops charged with infiltrating the seminaries of America and destroying the minds of the Christian leadership convincing them that God was the ultimate homophobe.
The Mainstream media Militia is the Tokyo Rose of the Secular Militia, charged with undermining every foundation upon which this nation was built and convincing us that clinging to our God and our Guns was old-fashioned and out of style.
Hollywood and the Screen Actors Guild Militia is a group of “don’t ask don’t tell” soldiers charged with undermining the morals of American children by changing the monogamous relationship into a sexual smorgasboard.
The National Bar Association Militia has assumed the duty of weakening American’s through the terrorism of “civil rights” lawsuits aimed at silencing the freedom of speech.
The Internal Revenue Service Militia is like the paratroopers that parachute in behind enemy lines to abscond with the allies resources and clamping a chain on churches who speak the Truth.
The National Organization For Women Militia are the WAC’s of the Secular Media charged with castration of the American male and the liberation of lion-like lesbians.
The GLESEN Militia has been given the mission of weakening this nation by blurring all gender roles and sexual morality and homosexualizing GI Joe
I could go on.
We are at war for this nation. It is a battle between those who fear the Lord and those who do not; Between those who believe Jesus is Lord and those who do not; Between those who think we work for the government and those who think the government should work for us.
It is clear that secular government has a militia and that they are determined to do all they can to squash the Christians. The war has already been declared. They aren’t fighting it with guns but with lies and intimidation.
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. Matt. 10:28
Americans have far more to fear from the Secular Militia than the “Christian” Militia. They are destroying this nation...one grenade at a time.
Order the CDs here: http://www.ptsalt.com/products
Do you think like a Christian or a humanist? Did the Founders really separate Church and State? Is Judicial tyranny ruining America? Check out these great teachings by the Coach
© 2010 Dave Daubenmire - All Rights Reserved
Coach Dave Daubenmire, founder and President of Pass The Salt Ministries www.ptsalt.com and Minutemen United www.minutemenunited.org, is host of the high octane Pass The Salt radio show heard in Columbus, Ohio.
In 1999 Coach Daubenmire was sued by the ACLU for praying with his teams while coaching high school in Ohio. He now spends his energy fighting for Christian principles in the public domain.
E-Mail: coach@ptsalt.com
See the whole article here: http://www.newswithviews.com/Daubenmire/dave189.htm
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
ALERT!!!! Possible False Flag APRIL 19th, Million Man March Massacre
I have been warning patriots for years to stay in a strictly defensive posture, and that the enemies of freedom want an excuse to start martial law. Here is one guy who put it to words.
Intelligence - Former Spy tells the truth
See the comments on this YouTube video to get the whole story.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHisG7gxUNs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHisG7gxUNs
Montana Freemen speak out from inside the 81 day standoff.
FREEMEN CALL IN ON RADIO TALK SHOW DURING MIND CONTROL INTERVIEW
The following is a transcript of a live radio broadcast conducted by telephone during the 81 day standoff in 1996 of the Montana Freemen near Jordan Montana. Most people have never seen anything that came directly from any of their side of the story. This is presented for your information only without comment. Read this and make up your own mind. You have heard much negative comment from mainstream media calling these people criminals and many other demonizing words. Now you can read their own words and make up your own mind if they are criminals or "political prisoners".
By T. Kirby March 23, 1996
During an interview with W.H. Bowart, author of OPERATION MIND CONTROL on the satellite-linked American Freedom Network, talk radio host John Bryant took a surprise call from Freemen while they were surrounded by Federal agents at their farm in Jordan, Justice Township, Montana. It was the first time the Freemen had been able to call from the compound without getting jammed.
When the call came, the so-called Freemen "standoff " with the feds was in its 60th day. The story was being poorly covered by the media -- so poorly covered in fact that Patriots had reason to be convinced that there was federal manipulation and control of the media in place. What the "standoff" was apparently really all about was that the Freemen, who, to their way of thinking , have legally severed all contracts with the federal government, seek protection under the common law which they believe takes precedence over federal law. Under common law, the Freemen maintain, among other things, the FBI has no right to operate in the State of Montana.
There are other points of common law which might create a powerful motive for the Freemen's side of the story to get suppressed -- points of law which would make the Federal Reserve Act and the National Security Act illegal and unconstitutional. These and other points of common law have made for an ever-widening gap between the federal government and Freemen whose stand represents a growing number of individuals who have severed their individual ties with federal authority to claim human rights provided under common law since the Magna Carta and before.
Shortly before the program was aired ( at 8 p.m. M.S.T) the computer service, America On Line, carried the following report from REUTER
"...the FBI said Thursday it set up equipment to sever power to the remote Montana ranch were the group is holed up.
"The activity came a few days after talks broke down and the mediator, Colorado state Sen. Charles Duke, flew home, saying "the time for negotiation is over."
"Agents trucked in generators late Wednesday, which would allow other farms in the region to receive electricity fi the Freemen were cut off. In Washington, Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick told reporters that FBI agents have not yet decided whether to cut off power. "Gorelick said the FBI remained interested in a peaceful resolution of the dispute and in settling the matter through negotiations, even though the latest round of talks collapsed. The Freemen have refused to talk directly with the FBI.
"We are keeping all lawful options open," Gorelick said. A woman, identified by local residents as Janet Clark, wife of Freeman Edwin Clark, was driven to the compound by two FBI agents. She was believed to be delivering medicine to a teen-age boy on the ranch.
"Activity was otherwise quiet.
"State Sen. Duke, who has links to the right-wing Patriot movement, suggested that authorities make life a little more difficult on the ranch, which is believed to be heavily armed.
"Moving in the generators appeared to be the first step, although federal authorities have been cautious since the standoff began March 25 when two Freemen leaders were arrested. " The FBI, criticized for its handling of previous confrontations with militant groups, has 100 agents ringing the ranch.
"The two leaders and several others among the 20 or so Freemen on the ranch are accused of taking part in a financial scheme to defraud businesses and public agencies of more than $1.8 million, stealing television news equipment and threatening a federal judge.
"The Freemen do not recognize government authority, refuse to pay taxes and hold white supremacist views."
Many have said that this is an example of biased reportage.
A photo on America On Line showed three large semi-trucks carrying what was supposed to be electrical generating equipment moving toward the Freemen farm in Justice Township.
W.H. Bowart, author of Operation Mind Control was being interviewed by John Bryant, the moderator of the call-in talk show. As their conversation approached the kind of Psyops used against the captive people at Waco, Bryant took a call to discover that Russell Landers was calling from the surrounded Freeman ranch for the first time. The exchange lasted for almost one half hour, with Landers and Rod Skurdal speaking in calm, even tones. They cited case law, offering examples of their side of the argument against the federal government in a lawyerly fashion, even-tempered and correct.
After Landers identified himself as the caller, Bryant asked how everybody was at the ranch.
Russell Landers: Everybody's perfectly all right.
John Bryant: Well, a lot of people are concerned about you, even though you've been deamonized royally out here.
Russ: Well, we expected that. When you can't win it straight up and down, you have to go the other way, I guess. That seems to be the way they play the game.
John: Senator Charles Duke was just there and he is a man that was well respected -- or is well respected -- in Colorado. And some of the statements he made... and apparently he is very frustrated and what can you tell us about the negotiations. Do you think there's a chance of continuation.
Russ: Well, first of all... there's never been any problem with them, with the exception with the fact that they are not negotiations. They are talks to resolve the matter lawfully.
John: ... right... thank you...
Russ: ... and the problem that we're facing here is the FBI and anyone that has come in to talk, first of all don't understand the law and second of all, have no intention of living by the law. And, for example, the FBI, in order to deal with any issue in good faith would have to present a written delegation of authority signed by the president.
That's not something I dreamt up. That's the only way you'll know that they're in good faith. And it's already been decided in the case of California Bankers Association vs. Shultz...
Furthermore, Treasury Decision 95-A specifically states that any agency that purports to represent the United States has to have such a certified delegation of authority or they have no authority.
In the absence of any authority. I can't imagine where any of us would benefit from talking to someone who had no authority to enter into any type of negotiations.
John: Russell, the biggest complaint of Charles Duke.... He was on the show the first hour, seven till eight mountain time, which is not on short wave yet, but he said that there were demands made... he took them out and the FBI agreed to them... he brought them back and then the people that were involved there, um... went back on their word...
Russ: Absolutely not. On the contrary, the demands that were made were outside of the law. And they used the negotiating skills that they had to manipulate a couple of us at the gate. And they almost got us to act outside of the law.
Frankly, the law provides some very important protections for people who are pending extradition, and they were demanding the extradition of a man here who has no charges against him, and who has every right to be wherever he wants to be. But there were some very nasty allegations being made. He was being purported to be a child molester and etc. There is no evidence here of that and there has been no due process of law to establish that fact. And there's been no due process that would warrant an extradition in that case.
We simply came back with our responsibility to live within the law and demanded that if these allegations were in fact well founded they should proceed with the legal avenues necessary for extradition, and hearing would be heard here of the proper paperwork were presented. John: Can you talk about what happened during the negotiations or talks there the last five days or so?
Russ: Yes. We came back to the point we've had since the very beginning. That point is we have presented them with a proposal. We have presented the law... the decisions that have already been made by the Supreme Court of The United States of America.... As to the conduct of the Federal Courts and as to the conduct of parties in these types of situations... and we have told the F's and anyone else who has come in... that if they can produce the evidence that all of their actions thus far are specifically in compliance with the law, every man woman and child at Justice Township will come out. It's not a problem with the law.
John: Senator Duke mentioned, too, there were children and, of course, there's stress on the safety of the children... and it was his personal thing to try to get them out and that ... I believe, one of the Wards' daughters was a 13 year-old, married to... or paired off a 40 year-old man by her mother, and in any case, what do you have to say about all that?
Russ: It's a lot of deamonizing and their using these children as a front.
John: We've seen that before with Waco... (click) ... Oops, are we still connected?
Apparently not. Apparently that was the end of our conversation... Oh... Pretty wild stuff.... if we get a call back... we may get a call back.... uh.... we'll give it a try.... that lasted about five minutes...
This is the experience they've had locally too, where they were able to call out....( music begins ) Oops, we'll be back after this break....
After commercials, Bryant resumed:
John: Well, we're back, Walter and I. Mr. Landers is not. Maybe he'll be able to call back.
Walter Bowart: Let's hope so. That was interesting.
John: No kidding.
Walter: Now, who's Landers? He's a lawyer?
John: No, he is in the Justice Township, west of Jordan, Montana. He is inside the township. This is the first folks... They've had a call out on... well, two nights ago to their friends and family... they've apparently kept a mobile or cellular phone, I'm not sure whether it's the old style technology or a cell phone... and they used it for the first time on Tuesday night... looks like we've got a call coming in now, so maybe we... I knew this would happen... They've got just a few minutes before it's cut off... put the caller on.... here we go... hello, Russell?
Russ: Yeah.
John: Oh, you're back, good...
Russ: Yeah. We got cut off there.
John: We sure did. Hey, take this any direction you want to and if I think of a pertinent question, I'll ask....
Russ: That sounds fine. In fact, this whole ploy about the children is all a big hoax. We're not dealing with a compound here, the only danger that's being presented to the people of Justice Township, men, women or children -- is the threat from the outside.
Right now we're living with a threat of loss of power. That is a frivolous move on their part because frankly we have more than adequate supplies and knowledge to remain on the ranch for the next several years without power. So, that's really a silly ploy.
But I do want to return to senator Charlie Duke.
We were extremely disappointed for quite some time. My wife and I, all over this country, supported his Tenth Amendment Resolution, we promoted it heavily. We promoted him as a individual who was standing for Americans and their rights. And we were sadly disappointed with his performance at Montana. In fact, his performance was just the opposite. He seemed very corporate, very corporate minded. His closing words to Rodney Skurdal as we presented him with the law and a simple demand that they comply with the law in order to show good faith and continue... his response was, "To hell with due process of law..."
John: He attributed that statement to the situation with the two young girls in the custody fight.
Russ: Yes. And you've taken a very good point there. The law is the law one-hundred percent of the time. And the emotions of the parties never overshadow the necessity to stand on the law. The people that he is purporting to go around due process of law on are entitled to their
defense of the law one-hundred percent of the time. And sometimes, our emotions would dictate that we would do something other than what the law would dictate, but frankly, everyone is entitled to their due process. And it was a summary and an expression of his entire demeanor here as he met with us here. He was to come here and act as an intermediary carrying our response to the FBI and vice versa. And, in fact, he failed to do so on every count. In fact his whole demeanor here was one of coming in and representing the FBI as opposed to representing us and carrying our message to them.
He agreed to meet with us, with Gene Schroder, with Walker Todd, and Nord Davis. For some reason Mr. Duke took it upon himself to come up here and do this all alone...
John: He apparently was in contact with Gene Schroder through the time over the phone... Russ: Well, he is making a lot of misstatements in public because we've talked with Mr. Davis and he basically sidestepped these other gentlemen and apparently had an agenda that he couldn't live with their presence when he came here. And certainly his agenda was not that of a mediator as he was invited by us.
John: I talked to Dr. Schroder tonight and he had not talked to Senator Duke since he had gotten back.
Russ: One of the things Mr. Davis presented to us is the fact that Mr. Duke is a former Arkansas resident and that he recently gave testimony to Congress about the Whitewater incident on behalf of the FBI. And in fact that testimony was, it appears now, plotted with lies and untruth....
John: Russell,? We've got a bottom of the hour break now that can't be avoided. Can you give us a call back in three minutes? Russ: I certainly can do that.
John: Okay. Thank you. .. You're tuned to the American Freedom Network, the John Bryant Show, we've got Russell Landers calling in from Justice Township in Jordan, Montana, and we've got Walter Bowart with us....
(Cut to Commercials.)
John: Welcome back. You're tuned to the John Bryant show, the American Freedom Network, with Walter Bowart tonight on Operation Mind Control, and we have had a phone call out of Justice Township. Hopefully we'll get a call back here in just a minute...
That was one break that we couldn't skip. It's built into the system and I can't work the computer... so.... uh... Walter?
Walter: Yeah John? That's very interesting. Justice Township, now does that mean he's on the site of the ranch?
John: He is.
Walter: So, he's inside. He sounds like a very level headed man... and he speaks very well. He sounds like a lawyer... actually... to say "misspeak" instead of "lie" and things like that...
John:... and they've been painted to be bumpkins.
Walter: ..oh.. yeah... that's... this is a great education for me, I'll tell you that.
John: ... it is, and it's right down your line...
Walter: Can we put this on the Internet?
John: Fine with me....
Walter: Okay. I wonder of any other news media will pick this up. This is a first, isn't it?
John: Yes it is. It is the first.
Walter: You're making history here...
John: My friends up there... Freeman on the outside with their families who I've been in contact with, they seem to be wonderful people. They've been on the show.
I just want people to see both sides of this thing because the media is just reeking with mind control... Walter... that's true. It's just propaganda. It's totally controlled and slanted. The coverage on this story is pathetic....
John: It just slapped me in the face the other day with the statements were being made after the break-off of the talks... and I just... I couldn't .. it just wouldn't compute. I just thought, there's something awry here.... and he's back... Hello Russell?
Russ: Hi. How ya doin'
John: We've got Walter Bowart on the show with you tonight who has written Operation Mind Control. Russ: Right.
John: This man has studied this for 25 years intensely. And it's appropriate that you're both....
Russ: He's obviously familiar with California vs. Hooker.
Walter: Yeah. You're very well educated and I'm impressed by what you're saying. This news has got to get out to the country...
Russ: Absolutely... Absolutely. America is on the line right now. And, you know, it's really unfortunate that a lot of side issues are used to divert people's attention from what's really happening here in this situation and across the country right?
John: Talk about the bottom line issues. I understand it's the nature of the currency, which is in question and the nature of the instruments that were used, and due process... is that pretty much it?
Russ: Yeah. The situation here is... the issue here is not the purported warrants and charges against the people here at Justice Township. In fact, Charlie Duke was quoted as saying that," every one here is guilty and needs to be prosecuted."
Wait a minute! I thought that we had a basis in law that we're innocent until proven guilty. And something that they do not want to deal with here, is that the courts today are not the courts of the people. They are not the judicial branch of the government. The judicial branch of government was vested in the people. And the court is the people and it's not these administrative courts of the bankruptcy that are being used to purport that they're delivering justice. In fact they're merely an extension of the executive branch of the government.
John: Stewart Waterhouse left there. Is that correct? And they promised him one thing and he got another?
Russ: Absolutely. We haven't been able to verify this today, but it's being verified and, I suspect, he's still incarcerated... Purportedly earlier in these talks he had no charges and he could leave any time he wanted to. In fact that has some bearing on the situation with the children they keep bringing up...
First of all, the children and parents have always been free to go. They came to this area, they came to the ranch, they wanted to live here, they choose to do that today. They've chosen to do that in the past and they continue to choose to do that because they don't feel safe anywhere else, frankly...
And uh... what you get down to here... is like, you know, there in Colorado, my wife and I have been accused of a number of things, but the fact of the matter is the case has already been adjudicated by the court. The court in Colorado has been noted of the acquittal and of the civil damages that were awarded. And that case is now res judicada. Right out here in the Tenth Circuit the court has recognized in a number of cases, it's being recognized all over the country. But we've still got these administrative tribunals attempting to run their Star Chambers and divert themselves from due process in an effort to cover up the truth and stop the people from presenting the truth to other people... It's that simple....
John: I certainly hope your full story gets out here. It's very difficult in sound bites to do it. There's an allegation too... Talk about you idea of what consists of a jury...
Russ: First of all, a jury of our peers as American Sovereigns would have to be other men of free character. And in fact, I'd like to introduce Rod Skurdal, because he has a very good handle on the jury, and I think he could present a better idea... more specifically... of what a juror has to be and how these presents courts are preventing the public from getting that.... Here's Rod Skurdal...
John:Hello Rod, welcome. You're on short-wave at 2.390 out of Nashville. And this is the American Freedom Network. We're broadcasting out of Johnstown, just north of Denver. I'm really glad to have you on.... We asked a question Rod, about the jury, about the nature of the jury that's right in your eyes.
Rod: A common law jury is 12 men who know the law and keep it well. Basically it goes back to Chapter 45 of the Magna Carta.
John: Was that adopted then into the Constitution?
Rod: Our Revised Codes of 1947 here in Montana starts off with the Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence, Constitution... and so forth, right on down the line to the Constitution of Montana... And it is part of the wording of the Constitution basically... it is adopted... our common law goes right back to the Magna Carta and if you take our common law back to its origin it goes right back to the Bible....
Basically anything you cite out of the Constitution, you can take it back to the Bible.... It's not something that we just thought of, it's already been established by the word of Almighty God.
John: Excuse me for a second. We're going to skip this next break. So, as long as you guys can stay on, you're welcome. We won't have this interruption with advertising this time.... So, continue... so what comprises a jury.
Rod: The common law is very consistent: " twelve men who know the law and keep it well." Chapter 45 of the Magna Carta. Okay this is freemen characters, basically your neighbors who know you, know your character, you're standing within the community and so forth. It is not twelve strangers that judge you.
John: I can see where that would work better, because, if your neighbor had something... if you did something that was a crime... your neighbor would certainly want to deal with it more than anyone else. Rod: Correct.
John: Talk about the nature... there was an argument... a position brought up today in a show, and a friend that actually called in that talked about if you dabbled in the UCC instruments, then that removed you from the common law. Is there connection back to the common law.
Rod: Yes. 103.6 out of Anderson, that says a statute cannot be read to preclude a common law action.
John: Very interesting.
Rod: So, every goes right back to the common law because the UCC cannot give you remedies, so therefore you step out of UCC's and go back to common law that gives you remedy. That's why everything is done under UCC 1-103, odd interpretation, coercion, so forth, where you go back to UCC 1-105 under "Conflict of Laws" therefore the rights go back to Common Law.
Walter: Can I ask a question, John?
John: Go right ahead.
Walter: So, what this confrontation is really all about is common law versus federal law?
John: Yeah. Well, and the nature of the currency in this country, just like we were talking about earlier....
Rod: It goes a little bit deeper than that. It's substantially... There's only three jurisdictions granted by the Constitution: One is Common law, the next one is Equity, and the third one is Admiralty where there is a mixture of public law for maritime and equity too. Now all these charges against everyone here are under Admiralty because... they like uh... go to your Title 18 or Title 27 or Title 26 of the United States Code... everything is based on public law, right?
John: Right.
Rod: Anyway, from there, there's a contract. Once you sign that application to get a Social Security application card, a driver's license, a marriage license or anything, that's a quasi contract. where you wave all your constitutional rights and now you're bound by the letter of the law of the contract which holds up any and all quasi contracts one title into another. Once you sign a quasi contract you've waved all your inalienable rights. Now you're bound by the letter of the law of the contract to specific performance. Such as a driver's license it has you say, "I agree to uphold the speed limit."
John: Talk about the influence on the currency. I don't honor it with the term money.
Rod: Credit. It's credit.
John: Talk about what your actions are doing there. What the Freeman's actions... what Leroy's actions.... are you a threat to the system?
Rod: Basically yeah. The nation's in debt to me right now. I'm one of the largest bankers in the nation right now... based on law... and I can take it right back into Biblical law... because even though we talk about gold and silver .... God also said we throw the gold and silver into the streets right? So, what's left? That's credit. It's all civilly correct and constitutionally correct....
John: I was just going to ask about the liens..
Rod: The best way to explain those is like a traffic ticket. Okay, you look at a traffic ticket. You've got a white copy, a blue, pink , green and yellow copy underneath it. Right?
John: Right.
Rod: Okay. The white copy is turned in to the clerk of the court. Basically you never see that again. You go in there and you fight that case and you win it, you never see that white copy --"case dismissed" do you? Or, if you go in there and you pay a $25 fine, you never see that white copy "paid in full." What they do is they take that white copy, a negotiable instrument, and turn it into... as an account receivable, therefore there is an unknown lien placed against you besides the fine or whatever, and they roll it in the banking system.
The same thing. Only on a traffic ticket you have ten days to answer the traffic ticket. Same way with your UCC. If you fail to answer within ten days, you're in default. They are a common law judgment and they are as good as gold....
John: Now, can that be corrected later if someone is not subject to the lien. In other words do they have beyond ten days to go back and correct that?
Rod: You go into a common law court and have that adjudicated there....
John: Okay, so the people who have liens on them could get them removed if they could answer the charges.
Rod: Right. but the thing is the way we write... okay, say you're a public official or a public hireling... okay.... no one here in Montana has an official bond filed with an oath of office, so what we do is write these up as a declaration: "I, Rodney Skurdal, being a duly elected County Sheriff of such-and-such county, did lawfully apply for the office and upon taking my oath of office I knowingly, willingly and intentionally disregard to file my oath of office because I was broke and could not do this and I could not buy insurance and can not go to county officials because that would be misappropriations of public funds, and blablabla....." I write it up as a situation to where he knowingly did this, contrary to his statute limits and his oath of office...
John: And the credit instruments are based on these liens, is that correct?
Rod: Underneath the full faith and credit of the United States,... Everyone in the national government has taken an oath of office on or the judgment of the several states, right?
John: Right.
Rod: Okay, when you look at the word " states" you gotta go to Texas versus White, 7 Wallace ,700-743 which states that the state is a people and not the created form of government. So, we the people are the state, in fact. And if we're going to honor the judgments from a state then, underneath the full faith and credit, it's their duty to pay it. They have no choice in the matter.
John: Oh. What else can we do out here? Is there anything....?
Rod: The main thing is that we want a Grand Jury to where we can present our full story and evidence under due process of law... if they're going to throw away due process of law, they've thrown away everything... We have a right to present out evidence, our exculpatory evidence, and be granted immunity to and from the Grand Jury, until we present everything.... John: What would it take from the FBI... what kind of guarantees..... Can you envision what it would take if they promised you a Grand Jury?
Rod: First off, you've got to realize that the FBI is not a government agency. And I can't cite the court cases right now....
John: We'll accept that for now...
Rod: Anyway they have to have a delegation of authority .... and they have to be registered to do business here in Montana, which they're not under 30-13, 215 and 216... just like the United States is not registered to do business here in Montana... I got a certificate of nonexistence from the Secretary of State, stating that the United States is not registered to do business here. So, the thing is....
John: I know that's alien to a lot of people....
Walter: Ask him what are in those vans, John?
Rod: Any corporation has to be registered when they do any business her in Montana or any of the states. You got to remember, all your statutes in our constitution are basically uniform, which means they are under Admiralty jurisdiction. That's one of the requirements of Admiralty jurisdiction is that all the statutes be uniform from state to state.
John: Rod, what would it take to get things corrected there? What kind of circumstances. Like a guarantee... what kind of signatures or whatever?
Rod: Okay. What we want is full immunity for everyone to and from the Grand Jury where we can testify and present our own evidence and everything to show that these statutes not only don't apply to us, but have never applied to anyone....
John: Okay. What to and from the grand jury...
Rod: Immunity... full immunity with the release of the people who've been kidnapped already so that they can also prepare their evidence... and the thing is, a Grand Jury would have to be involved...
John: Okay... Would you need signatures from officials? What sort of guarantees would you need here?
Rod: I'd like to see it in black and white, but they won't... I doubt if there's anyone out there that will actually do it.
John: Okay Rod, we've got a break now that we can't skip now. If you can stay with us, please do it. We've got a two minute break and then we're just about to the end of the show. We'll have four minutes after this two minutes...
Rod: I'll let you talk to Russell for a while here...
John: Okay We'll be back in two minutes. You're tuned to the American Freedom Network. This is the John Bryant Show. We've got Walter Bowart and we've got Rod Skurdal and Russell Landers with us out of Justice Township.
(Cut to Commercial.)
John: Welcome back. Are we still on with the Justice Township?>
Russ: Hey! We certainly are! John: Right on! That's great. And who's with us now?
Russ: This is Russ.
John: Hi Russ. Okay. What do you see would be necessary that would bring things to a conclusion that is acceptable here with a Grand Jury. Russ: First of all the FBI or anyone who purported to represent the United States would have to present their written delegation of authority. Once they did that, they would be in compliance with the law as far as their requirements to meet with us on a good faith basis. Then of course from the very beginning, we have presented the FBI, the United States Attorney, etc. with the 19 pages and points of law which reference the decisions already made with regard to ingress upon us by the ah... these pages reference those elements of law that have already been decided with reference to that ingress..... If they can show specifically that they are in compliance with every one of their actions, uh, that would end this thing peacefully at that point...
John: That document... could that be made available?
Russ: Oh yeah. Absolutely. The only problem I would have would be in getting it to you. But that has already been presented to the FBI, it has been presented to a number of members of the media, and it can be presented to someone again, and in fact, provided your freedom and liberty weren't ingressed upon, someone from your station or someone from this type of media is more than welcome to come here and get this information....
The public has to be aware that everything they've heard has been presented by the other side, because they will not let us produce any evidence... they will not let us produce any kind of information out of Justice Township whatsoever other than what they want to design their presentation with...
And we'll certainly get it out if that's at all possible...
John: Well, we're in communication with people in Billings.... and we've just got about a minute and thirty seconds.... You're welcome to contact us here, if something has got to get out, as long as you can...
Russ: Okay.
John: And anything that we can do, we'll certainly make an attempt to do.
Russ: This challenge should be put before the public in every way. You know the public needs to be asking the questions, "What is the FBI and everyone hiding? Why don't they want to let the people of Justice Township present the evidence and get the evidence out?
John: Do you see the two issues as Due Process( of Law )and the nature of the currency?
Russ: Absolutely. They're still attempting to hide this fraud of the Federal Reserve and everything that ties into that with the UCC.
John: You've taken on the whole beast.
Russ: Absolutely. Well, we haven't really. You know, God is our maker and he's standing behind us 100 percent.
John: It sure makes for a whole different approach, that's for sure. We certainly wish you the best. Like I said, anytime, anything we can attempt to do here, I'd certainly entertain it. Thank you for coming on. We need to keep the word getting out and, if you can communicate with any of those people, Kevin or Randy, they can always get ahold of us.
Russ: And we appreciate this, and the American people need to be looking at this in the light of their own freedom.
The American Freedom Network broadcasts shortwave programs Monday through Friday from 11 a.m. to 12 noon and from 2 to 3 p.m. Mountain Time on 9.475. Then it switches to 7.435 and broadcasts from 3 to 7 p.m. Mountain Time. From 8 to 10 p.m. Mountain Time it broadcasts on 2.350. Tapes of this program can be ordered from American Freedom Network at P.O. Box 430, Johnstown, Colorado 80534, or by calling toll free to: 1-800-205-6245.
Spelling of names was provided by John Bryant.
---------------------------------------------------
Read original article here: http://www.iahushua.com/T-L-J/innerview.html
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
The following is a transcript of a live radio broadcast conducted by telephone during the 81 day standoff in 1996 of the Montana Freemen near Jordan Montana. Most people have never seen anything that came directly from any of their side of the story. This is presented for your information only without comment. Read this and make up your own mind. You have heard much negative comment from mainstream media calling these people criminals and many other demonizing words. Now you can read their own words and make up your own mind if they are criminals or "political prisoners".
By T. Kirby March 23, 1996
During an interview with W.H. Bowart, author of OPERATION MIND CONTROL on the satellite-linked American Freedom Network, talk radio host John Bryant took a surprise call from Freemen while they were surrounded by Federal agents at their farm in Jordan, Justice Township, Montana. It was the first time the Freemen had been able to call from the compound without getting jammed.
When the call came, the so-called Freemen "standoff " with the feds was in its 60th day. The story was being poorly covered by the media -- so poorly covered in fact that Patriots had reason to be convinced that there was federal manipulation and control of the media in place. What the "standoff" was apparently really all about was that the Freemen, who, to their way of thinking , have legally severed all contracts with the federal government, seek protection under the common law which they believe takes precedence over federal law. Under common law, the Freemen maintain, among other things, the FBI has no right to operate in the State of Montana.
There are other points of common law which might create a powerful motive for the Freemen's side of the story to get suppressed -- points of law which would make the Federal Reserve Act and the National Security Act illegal and unconstitutional. These and other points of common law have made for an ever-widening gap between the federal government and Freemen whose stand represents a growing number of individuals who have severed their individual ties with federal authority to claim human rights provided under common law since the Magna Carta and before.
Shortly before the program was aired ( at 8 p.m. M.S.T) the computer service, America On Line, carried the following report from REUTER
"...the FBI said Thursday it set up equipment to sever power to the remote Montana ranch were the group is holed up.
"The activity came a few days after talks broke down and the mediator, Colorado state Sen. Charles Duke, flew home, saying "the time for negotiation is over."
"Agents trucked in generators late Wednesday, which would allow other farms in the region to receive electricity fi the Freemen were cut off. In Washington, Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick told reporters that FBI agents have not yet decided whether to cut off power. "Gorelick said the FBI remained interested in a peaceful resolution of the dispute and in settling the matter through negotiations, even though the latest round of talks collapsed. The Freemen have refused to talk directly with the FBI.
"We are keeping all lawful options open," Gorelick said. A woman, identified by local residents as Janet Clark, wife of Freeman Edwin Clark, was driven to the compound by two FBI agents. She was believed to be delivering medicine to a teen-age boy on the ranch.
"Activity was otherwise quiet.
"State Sen. Duke, who has links to the right-wing Patriot movement, suggested that authorities make life a little more difficult on the ranch, which is believed to be heavily armed.
"Moving in the generators appeared to be the first step, although federal authorities have been cautious since the standoff began March 25 when two Freemen leaders were arrested. " The FBI, criticized for its handling of previous confrontations with militant groups, has 100 agents ringing the ranch.
"The two leaders and several others among the 20 or so Freemen on the ranch are accused of taking part in a financial scheme to defraud businesses and public agencies of more than $1.8 million, stealing television news equipment and threatening a federal judge.
"The Freemen do not recognize government authority, refuse to pay taxes and hold white supremacist views."
Many have said that this is an example of biased reportage.
A photo on America On Line showed three large semi-trucks carrying what was supposed to be electrical generating equipment moving toward the Freemen farm in Justice Township.
W.H. Bowart, author of Operation Mind Control was being interviewed by John Bryant, the moderator of the call-in talk show. As their conversation approached the kind of Psyops used against the captive people at Waco, Bryant took a call to discover that Russell Landers was calling from the surrounded Freeman ranch for the first time. The exchange lasted for almost one half hour, with Landers and Rod Skurdal speaking in calm, even tones. They cited case law, offering examples of their side of the argument against the federal government in a lawyerly fashion, even-tempered and correct.
After Landers identified himself as the caller, Bryant asked how everybody was at the ranch.
Russell Landers: Everybody's perfectly all right.
John Bryant: Well, a lot of people are concerned about you, even though you've been deamonized royally out here.
Russ: Well, we expected that. When you can't win it straight up and down, you have to go the other way, I guess. That seems to be the way they play the game.
John: Senator Charles Duke was just there and he is a man that was well respected -- or is well respected -- in Colorado. And some of the statements he made... and apparently he is very frustrated and what can you tell us about the negotiations. Do you think there's a chance of continuation.
Russ: Well, first of all... there's never been any problem with them, with the exception with the fact that they are not negotiations. They are talks to resolve the matter lawfully.
John: ... right... thank you...
Russ: ... and the problem that we're facing here is the FBI and anyone that has come in to talk, first of all don't understand the law and second of all, have no intention of living by the law. And, for example, the FBI, in order to deal with any issue in good faith would have to present a written delegation of authority signed by the president.
That's not something I dreamt up. That's the only way you'll know that they're in good faith. And it's already been decided in the case of California Bankers Association vs. Shultz...
Furthermore, Treasury Decision 95-A specifically states that any agency that purports to represent the United States has to have such a certified delegation of authority or they have no authority.
In the absence of any authority. I can't imagine where any of us would benefit from talking to someone who had no authority to enter into any type of negotiations.
John: Russell, the biggest complaint of Charles Duke.... He was on the show the first hour, seven till eight mountain time, which is not on short wave yet, but he said that there were demands made... he took them out and the FBI agreed to them... he brought them back and then the people that were involved there, um... went back on their word...
Russ: Absolutely not. On the contrary, the demands that were made were outside of the law. And they used the negotiating skills that they had to manipulate a couple of us at the gate. And they almost got us to act outside of the law.
Frankly, the law provides some very important protections for people who are pending extradition, and they were demanding the extradition of a man here who has no charges against him, and who has every right to be wherever he wants to be. But there were some very nasty allegations being made. He was being purported to be a child molester and etc. There is no evidence here of that and there has been no due process of law to establish that fact. And there's been no due process that would warrant an extradition in that case.
We simply came back with our responsibility to live within the law and demanded that if these allegations were in fact well founded they should proceed with the legal avenues necessary for extradition, and hearing would be heard here of the proper paperwork were presented. John: Can you talk about what happened during the negotiations or talks there the last five days or so?
Russ: Yes. We came back to the point we've had since the very beginning. That point is we have presented them with a proposal. We have presented the law... the decisions that have already been made by the Supreme Court of The United States of America.... As to the conduct of the Federal Courts and as to the conduct of parties in these types of situations... and we have told the F's and anyone else who has come in... that if they can produce the evidence that all of their actions thus far are specifically in compliance with the law, every man woman and child at Justice Township will come out. It's not a problem with the law.
John: Senator Duke mentioned, too, there were children and, of course, there's stress on the safety of the children... and it was his personal thing to try to get them out and that ... I believe, one of the Wards' daughters was a 13 year-old, married to... or paired off a 40 year-old man by her mother, and in any case, what do you have to say about all that?
Russ: It's a lot of deamonizing and their using these children as a front.
John: We've seen that before with Waco... (click) ... Oops, are we still connected?
Apparently not. Apparently that was the end of our conversation... Oh... Pretty wild stuff.... if we get a call back... we may get a call back.... uh.... we'll give it a try.... that lasted about five minutes...
This is the experience they've had locally too, where they were able to call out....( music begins ) Oops, we'll be back after this break....
After commercials, Bryant resumed:
John: Well, we're back, Walter and I. Mr. Landers is not. Maybe he'll be able to call back.
Walter Bowart: Let's hope so. That was interesting.
John: No kidding.
Walter: Now, who's Landers? He's a lawyer?
John: No, he is in the Justice Township, west of Jordan, Montana. He is inside the township. This is the first folks... They've had a call out on... well, two nights ago to their friends and family... they've apparently kept a mobile or cellular phone, I'm not sure whether it's the old style technology or a cell phone... and they used it for the first time on Tuesday night... looks like we've got a call coming in now, so maybe we... I knew this would happen... They've got just a few minutes before it's cut off... put the caller on.... here we go... hello, Russell?
Russ: Yeah.
John: Oh, you're back, good...
Russ: Yeah. We got cut off there.
John: We sure did. Hey, take this any direction you want to and if I think of a pertinent question, I'll ask....
Russ: That sounds fine. In fact, this whole ploy about the children is all a big hoax. We're not dealing with a compound here, the only danger that's being presented to the people of Justice Township, men, women or children -- is the threat from the outside.
Right now we're living with a threat of loss of power. That is a frivolous move on their part because frankly we have more than adequate supplies and knowledge to remain on the ranch for the next several years without power. So, that's really a silly ploy.
But I do want to return to senator Charlie Duke.
We were extremely disappointed for quite some time. My wife and I, all over this country, supported his Tenth Amendment Resolution, we promoted it heavily. We promoted him as a individual who was standing for Americans and their rights. And we were sadly disappointed with his performance at Montana. In fact, his performance was just the opposite. He seemed very corporate, very corporate minded. His closing words to Rodney Skurdal as we presented him with the law and a simple demand that they comply with the law in order to show good faith and continue... his response was, "To hell with due process of law..."
John: He attributed that statement to the situation with the two young girls in the custody fight.
Russ: Yes. And you've taken a very good point there. The law is the law one-hundred percent of the time. And the emotions of the parties never overshadow the necessity to stand on the law. The people that he is purporting to go around due process of law on are entitled to their
defense of the law one-hundred percent of the time. And sometimes, our emotions would dictate that we would do something other than what the law would dictate, but frankly, everyone is entitled to their due process. And it was a summary and an expression of his entire demeanor here as he met with us here. He was to come here and act as an intermediary carrying our response to the FBI and vice versa. And, in fact, he failed to do so on every count. In fact his whole demeanor here was one of coming in and representing the FBI as opposed to representing us and carrying our message to them.
He agreed to meet with us, with Gene Schroder, with Walker Todd, and Nord Davis. For some reason Mr. Duke took it upon himself to come up here and do this all alone...
John: He apparently was in contact with Gene Schroder through the time over the phone... Russ: Well, he is making a lot of misstatements in public because we've talked with Mr. Davis and he basically sidestepped these other gentlemen and apparently had an agenda that he couldn't live with their presence when he came here. And certainly his agenda was not that of a mediator as he was invited by us.
John: I talked to Dr. Schroder tonight and he had not talked to Senator Duke since he had gotten back.
Russ: One of the things Mr. Davis presented to us is the fact that Mr. Duke is a former Arkansas resident and that he recently gave testimony to Congress about the Whitewater incident on behalf of the FBI. And in fact that testimony was, it appears now, plotted with lies and untruth....
John: Russell,? We've got a bottom of the hour break now that can't be avoided. Can you give us a call back in three minutes? Russ: I certainly can do that.
John: Okay. Thank you. .. You're tuned to the American Freedom Network, the John Bryant Show, we've got Russell Landers calling in from Justice Township in Jordan, Montana, and we've got Walter Bowart with us....
(Cut to Commercials.)
John: Welcome back. You're tuned to the John Bryant show, the American Freedom Network, with Walter Bowart tonight on Operation Mind Control, and we have had a phone call out of Justice Township. Hopefully we'll get a call back here in just a minute...
That was one break that we couldn't skip. It's built into the system and I can't work the computer... so.... uh... Walter?
Walter: Yeah John? That's very interesting. Justice Township, now does that mean he's on the site of the ranch?
John: He is.
Walter: So, he's inside. He sounds like a very level headed man... and he speaks very well. He sounds like a lawyer... actually... to say "misspeak" instead of "lie" and things like that...
John:... and they've been painted to be bumpkins.
Walter: ..oh.. yeah... that's... this is a great education for me, I'll tell you that.
John: ... it is, and it's right down your line...
Walter: Can we put this on the Internet?
John: Fine with me....
Walter: Okay. I wonder of any other news media will pick this up. This is a first, isn't it?
John: Yes it is. It is the first.
Walter: You're making history here...
John: My friends up there... Freeman on the outside with their families who I've been in contact with, they seem to be wonderful people. They've been on the show.
I just want people to see both sides of this thing because the media is just reeking with mind control... Walter... that's true. It's just propaganda. It's totally controlled and slanted. The coverage on this story is pathetic....
John: It just slapped me in the face the other day with the statements were being made after the break-off of the talks... and I just... I couldn't .. it just wouldn't compute. I just thought, there's something awry here.... and he's back... Hello Russell?
Russ: Hi. How ya doin'
John: We've got Walter Bowart on the show with you tonight who has written Operation Mind Control. Russ: Right.
John: This man has studied this for 25 years intensely. And it's appropriate that you're both....
Russ: He's obviously familiar with California vs. Hooker.
Walter: Yeah. You're very well educated and I'm impressed by what you're saying. This news has got to get out to the country...
Russ: Absolutely... Absolutely. America is on the line right now. And, you know, it's really unfortunate that a lot of side issues are used to divert people's attention from what's really happening here in this situation and across the country right?
John: Talk about the bottom line issues. I understand it's the nature of the currency, which is in question and the nature of the instruments that were used, and due process... is that pretty much it?
Russ: Yeah. The situation here is... the issue here is not the purported warrants and charges against the people here at Justice Township. In fact, Charlie Duke was quoted as saying that," every one here is guilty and needs to be prosecuted."
Wait a minute! I thought that we had a basis in law that we're innocent until proven guilty. And something that they do not want to deal with here, is that the courts today are not the courts of the people. They are not the judicial branch of the government. The judicial branch of government was vested in the people. And the court is the people and it's not these administrative courts of the bankruptcy that are being used to purport that they're delivering justice. In fact they're merely an extension of the executive branch of the government.
John: Stewart Waterhouse left there. Is that correct? And they promised him one thing and he got another?
Russ: Absolutely. We haven't been able to verify this today, but it's being verified and, I suspect, he's still incarcerated... Purportedly earlier in these talks he had no charges and he could leave any time he wanted to. In fact that has some bearing on the situation with the children they keep bringing up...
First of all, the children and parents have always been free to go. They came to this area, they came to the ranch, they wanted to live here, they choose to do that today. They've chosen to do that in the past and they continue to choose to do that because they don't feel safe anywhere else, frankly...
And uh... what you get down to here... is like, you know, there in Colorado, my wife and I have been accused of a number of things, but the fact of the matter is the case has already been adjudicated by the court. The court in Colorado has been noted of the acquittal and of the civil damages that were awarded. And that case is now res judicada. Right out here in the Tenth Circuit the court has recognized in a number of cases, it's being recognized all over the country. But we've still got these administrative tribunals attempting to run their Star Chambers and divert themselves from due process in an effort to cover up the truth and stop the people from presenting the truth to other people... It's that simple....
John: I certainly hope your full story gets out here. It's very difficult in sound bites to do it. There's an allegation too... Talk about you idea of what consists of a jury...
Russ: First of all, a jury of our peers as American Sovereigns would have to be other men of free character. And in fact, I'd like to introduce Rod Skurdal, because he has a very good handle on the jury, and I think he could present a better idea... more specifically... of what a juror has to be and how these presents courts are preventing the public from getting that.... Here's Rod Skurdal...
John:Hello Rod, welcome. You're on short-wave at 2.390 out of Nashville. And this is the American Freedom Network. We're broadcasting out of Johnstown, just north of Denver. I'm really glad to have you on.... We asked a question Rod, about the jury, about the nature of the jury that's right in your eyes.
Rod: A common law jury is 12 men who know the law and keep it well. Basically it goes back to Chapter 45 of the Magna Carta.
John: Was that adopted then into the Constitution?
Rod: Our Revised Codes of 1947 here in Montana starts off with the Magna Carta, the Declaration of Independence, Constitution... and so forth, right on down the line to the Constitution of Montana... And it is part of the wording of the Constitution basically... it is adopted... our common law goes right back to the Magna Carta and if you take our common law back to its origin it goes right back to the Bible....
Basically anything you cite out of the Constitution, you can take it back to the Bible.... It's not something that we just thought of, it's already been established by the word of Almighty God.
John: Excuse me for a second. We're going to skip this next break. So, as long as you guys can stay on, you're welcome. We won't have this interruption with advertising this time.... So, continue... so what comprises a jury.
Rod: The common law is very consistent: " twelve men who know the law and keep it well." Chapter 45 of the Magna Carta. Okay this is freemen characters, basically your neighbors who know you, know your character, you're standing within the community and so forth. It is not twelve strangers that judge you.
John: I can see where that would work better, because, if your neighbor had something... if you did something that was a crime... your neighbor would certainly want to deal with it more than anyone else. Rod: Correct.
John: Talk about the nature... there was an argument... a position brought up today in a show, and a friend that actually called in that talked about if you dabbled in the UCC instruments, then that removed you from the common law. Is there connection back to the common law.
Rod: Yes. 103.6 out of Anderson, that says a statute cannot be read to preclude a common law action.
John: Very interesting.
Rod: So, every goes right back to the common law because the UCC cannot give you remedies, so therefore you step out of UCC's and go back to common law that gives you remedy. That's why everything is done under UCC 1-103, odd interpretation, coercion, so forth, where you go back to UCC 1-105 under "Conflict of Laws" therefore the rights go back to Common Law.
Walter: Can I ask a question, John?
John: Go right ahead.
Walter: So, what this confrontation is really all about is common law versus federal law?
John: Yeah. Well, and the nature of the currency in this country, just like we were talking about earlier....
Rod: It goes a little bit deeper than that. It's substantially... There's only three jurisdictions granted by the Constitution: One is Common law, the next one is Equity, and the third one is Admiralty where there is a mixture of public law for maritime and equity too. Now all these charges against everyone here are under Admiralty because... they like uh... go to your Title 18 or Title 27 or Title 26 of the United States Code... everything is based on public law, right?
John: Right.
Rod: Anyway, from there, there's a contract. Once you sign that application to get a Social Security application card, a driver's license, a marriage license or anything, that's a quasi contract. where you wave all your constitutional rights and now you're bound by the letter of the law of the contract which holds up any and all quasi contracts one title into another. Once you sign a quasi contract you've waved all your inalienable rights. Now you're bound by the letter of the law of the contract to specific performance. Such as a driver's license it has you say, "I agree to uphold the speed limit."
John: Talk about the influence on the currency. I don't honor it with the term money.
Rod: Credit. It's credit.
John: Talk about what your actions are doing there. What the Freeman's actions... what Leroy's actions.... are you a threat to the system?
Rod: Basically yeah. The nation's in debt to me right now. I'm one of the largest bankers in the nation right now... based on law... and I can take it right back into Biblical law... because even though we talk about gold and silver .... God also said we throw the gold and silver into the streets right? So, what's left? That's credit. It's all civilly correct and constitutionally correct....
John: I was just going to ask about the liens..
Rod: The best way to explain those is like a traffic ticket. Okay, you look at a traffic ticket. You've got a white copy, a blue, pink , green and yellow copy underneath it. Right?
John: Right.
Rod: Okay. The white copy is turned in to the clerk of the court. Basically you never see that again. You go in there and you fight that case and you win it, you never see that white copy --"case dismissed" do you? Or, if you go in there and you pay a $25 fine, you never see that white copy "paid in full." What they do is they take that white copy, a negotiable instrument, and turn it into... as an account receivable, therefore there is an unknown lien placed against you besides the fine or whatever, and they roll it in the banking system.
The same thing. Only on a traffic ticket you have ten days to answer the traffic ticket. Same way with your UCC. If you fail to answer within ten days, you're in default. They are a common law judgment and they are as good as gold....
John: Now, can that be corrected later if someone is not subject to the lien. In other words do they have beyond ten days to go back and correct that?
Rod: You go into a common law court and have that adjudicated there....
John: Okay, so the people who have liens on them could get them removed if they could answer the charges.
Rod: Right. but the thing is the way we write... okay, say you're a public official or a public hireling... okay.... no one here in Montana has an official bond filed with an oath of office, so what we do is write these up as a declaration: "I, Rodney Skurdal, being a duly elected County Sheriff of such-and-such county, did lawfully apply for the office and upon taking my oath of office I knowingly, willingly and intentionally disregard to file my oath of office because I was broke and could not do this and I could not buy insurance and can not go to county officials because that would be misappropriations of public funds, and blablabla....." I write it up as a situation to where he knowingly did this, contrary to his statute limits and his oath of office...
John: And the credit instruments are based on these liens, is that correct?
Rod: Underneath the full faith and credit of the United States,... Everyone in the national government has taken an oath of office on or the judgment of the several states, right?
John: Right.
Rod: Okay, when you look at the word " states" you gotta go to Texas versus White, 7 Wallace ,700-743 which states that the state is a people and not the created form of government. So, we the people are the state, in fact. And if we're going to honor the judgments from a state then, underneath the full faith and credit, it's their duty to pay it. They have no choice in the matter.
John: Oh. What else can we do out here? Is there anything....?
Rod: The main thing is that we want a Grand Jury to where we can present our full story and evidence under due process of law... if they're going to throw away due process of law, they've thrown away everything... We have a right to present out evidence, our exculpatory evidence, and be granted immunity to and from the Grand Jury, until we present everything.... John: What would it take from the FBI... what kind of guarantees..... Can you envision what it would take if they promised you a Grand Jury?
Rod: First off, you've got to realize that the FBI is not a government agency. And I can't cite the court cases right now....
John: We'll accept that for now...
Rod: Anyway they have to have a delegation of authority .... and they have to be registered to do business here in Montana, which they're not under 30-13, 215 and 216... just like the United States is not registered to do business here in Montana... I got a certificate of nonexistence from the Secretary of State, stating that the United States is not registered to do business here. So, the thing is....
John: I know that's alien to a lot of people....
Walter: Ask him what are in those vans, John?
Rod: Any corporation has to be registered when they do any business her in Montana or any of the states. You got to remember, all your statutes in our constitution are basically uniform, which means they are under Admiralty jurisdiction. That's one of the requirements of Admiralty jurisdiction is that all the statutes be uniform from state to state.
John: Rod, what would it take to get things corrected there? What kind of circumstances. Like a guarantee... what kind of signatures or whatever?
Rod: Okay. What we want is full immunity for everyone to and from the Grand Jury where we can testify and present our own evidence and everything to show that these statutes not only don't apply to us, but have never applied to anyone....
John: Okay. What to and from the grand jury...
Rod: Immunity... full immunity with the release of the people who've been kidnapped already so that they can also prepare their evidence... and the thing is, a Grand Jury would have to be involved...
John: Okay... Would you need signatures from officials? What sort of guarantees would you need here?
Rod: I'd like to see it in black and white, but they won't... I doubt if there's anyone out there that will actually do it.
John: Okay Rod, we've got a break now that we can't skip now. If you can stay with us, please do it. We've got a two minute break and then we're just about to the end of the show. We'll have four minutes after this two minutes...
Rod: I'll let you talk to Russell for a while here...
John: Okay We'll be back in two minutes. You're tuned to the American Freedom Network. This is the John Bryant Show. We've got Walter Bowart and we've got Rod Skurdal and Russell Landers with us out of Justice Township.
(Cut to Commercial.)
John: Welcome back. Are we still on with the Justice Township?>
Russ: Hey! We certainly are! John: Right on! That's great. And who's with us now?
Russ: This is Russ.
John: Hi Russ. Okay. What do you see would be necessary that would bring things to a conclusion that is acceptable here with a Grand Jury. Russ: First of all the FBI or anyone who purported to represent the United States would have to present their written delegation of authority. Once they did that, they would be in compliance with the law as far as their requirements to meet with us on a good faith basis. Then of course from the very beginning, we have presented the FBI, the United States Attorney, etc. with the 19 pages and points of law which reference the decisions already made with regard to ingress upon us by the ah... these pages reference those elements of law that have already been decided with reference to that ingress..... If they can show specifically that they are in compliance with every one of their actions, uh, that would end this thing peacefully at that point...
John: That document... could that be made available?
Russ: Oh yeah. Absolutely. The only problem I would have would be in getting it to you. But that has already been presented to the FBI, it has been presented to a number of members of the media, and it can be presented to someone again, and in fact, provided your freedom and liberty weren't ingressed upon, someone from your station or someone from this type of media is more than welcome to come here and get this information....
The public has to be aware that everything they've heard has been presented by the other side, because they will not let us produce any evidence... they will not let us produce any kind of information out of Justice Township whatsoever other than what they want to design their presentation with...
And we'll certainly get it out if that's at all possible...
John: Well, we're in communication with people in Billings.... and we've just got about a minute and thirty seconds.... You're welcome to contact us here, if something has got to get out, as long as you can...
Russ: Okay.
John: And anything that we can do, we'll certainly make an attempt to do.
Russ: This challenge should be put before the public in every way. You know the public needs to be asking the questions, "What is the FBI and everyone hiding? Why don't they want to let the people of Justice Township present the evidence and get the evidence out?
John: Do you see the two issues as Due Process( of Law )and the nature of the currency?
Russ: Absolutely. They're still attempting to hide this fraud of the Federal Reserve and everything that ties into that with the UCC.
John: You've taken on the whole beast.
Russ: Absolutely. Well, we haven't really. You know, God is our maker and he's standing behind us 100 percent.
John: It sure makes for a whole different approach, that's for sure. We certainly wish you the best. Like I said, anytime, anything we can attempt to do here, I'd certainly entertain it. Thank you for coming on. We need to keep the word getting out and, if you can communicate with any of those people, Kevin or Randy, they can always get ahold of us.
Russ: And we appreciate this, and the American people need to be looking at this in the light of their own freedom.
The American Freedom Network broadcasts shortwave programs Monday through Friday from 11 a.m. to 12 noon and from 2 to 3 p.m. Mountain Time on 9.475. Then it switches to 7.435 and broadcasts from 3 to 7 p.m. Mountain Time. From 8 to 10 p.m. Mountain Time it broadcasts on 2.350. Tapes of this program can be ordered from American Freedom Network at P.O. Box 430, Johnstown, Colorado 80534, or by calling toll free to: 1-800-205-6245.
Spelling of names was provided by John Bryant.
---------------------------------------------------
Read original article here: http://www.iahushua.com/T-L-J/innerview.html
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Nullification of Obama's "Death Care Bill"
How do we get rid of the Unconstitutional
"Death Care" monster without a war?
See the comments section below this video here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPDRrj0sPKE
"Death Care" monster without a war?
See the comments section below this video here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPDRrj0sPKE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)