Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress
You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.
The value of the money in your pocket depends on
oil.
Think about that statement for a full minute. Really
think.
Oil is the commodity asset backing the corporate
funny money called the UNITED STATES DOLLAR (USD). That is why it
is also known as the “Petrodollar”.
The value of your labor is tied to oil. The value of
your house is tied to oil. The value of your land is tied to
oil. And so is the cost of your food, your education, your medical
care, and everything else you can think of.
It has been this way since 1971, but somehow, the news still hasn’t
come home to Main Street.
Prosecutors in Las Vegas filed a Motion In Limine late Tuesday in the case of The United States vs Cliven Bundy et al — in hopes that Nevada District Court Judge Gloria Navarro – will allow the Government to “cover-up” any wrong doing agents in the Bureau Of Land Management – who conducted the Bundy cattle impoundment in April of 2014 – may have committed.
“It’s a shocking blatant attempt by the Government to cover-up the brutal conduct of BLM agents that caused a near catastrophe in Bunkerville, Nevada during the impoundment of rancher Cliven Bundy’s cattle,” says a defense attorney representing one of the defendants in the case.
The motion is a draconian attempt at best to “protect” government agents from being exposed to further scrutiny during the upcoming Nevada trials in which they will be under-oath to tell the truth.
Read the rest at:
http://thepetesantillishow.com/prosecutors-in-nevada-beg-trial-judge-to-protect-the-blm-from-scrutiny-during-bundy-trial/ Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)
Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the
United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation
of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or
judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking
to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S.
200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia,
19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821). Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974)
Note: By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private
individual (in his person). When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not
follow the law, the Judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges' orders are not
voidable, but VOID, and of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court stated that "when a
state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes
into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his
official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his
individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to
the supreme authority of the United States."
When I was a kid and I would come home from school with some piece of
popular psycho-babble my Mother would always rear back and look at me closely
and ask, "Where did you hear that?"
If the answer was a teacher or some other unfortunate adult, Mother had a
way of going to the source and correcting things on the spot. Otherwise, the
answer was always the same: "Consider the source."
That is what we all desperately need to be doing with mainstream media.
I have told this story before, but will tell it again because it is
something that you can all do (and easily prove) for yourselves.
Back in the 1980's my husband, I, and a small group of about eight friends
did a little experiment. We all agreed to listen to one or another of the
popular Nightly News programs--- CBS, ABC, NBC, and BBC at that time.
This involved a piece of paper divided into four columns headed: "Sex",
"Death", "Both" and "Other" with an extra column for the "Date" of the
show.
Today the world is a-flutter with news and disgruntlement about Donald
Trump's Executive Orders re-enlivening the oil pipeline projects that Obama and
the Army Corps of Engineers shut down.
He's the Chief Executive of a worldwide conglomerate whose lifeblood
depends upon oil. What do you expect him to do?
The interesting question isn't, "Why is Donald Trump doing this?"---- but
rather, "Why didn't Obama do this?"
The banks
control the governments, not the other way around. It has been this way for 150
years in Britain, the Commonwealth countries, the US, Germany, most of Europe,
most of Asia, most of Africa.... and when a government tries to assert itself
and make its own decisions and adopt its own currency for the benefit of its own
people, as Libya's government did and as Iran's government has, it is promptly
attacked by all the other governments. Why? Because the banks run
the governments as storefront governmental services corporations, and the banks
like it that way.
It gives them a
free hand and world dominance. They get to use the resources of the entire
planet any way they please. They get to regulate and deregulate themselves in
whatever way is most advantageous to them. Forget the good of the people or the
country they are supposed to be representing.
Just look at
what FDR did to THE VIRGINIA COLONY CORPORATION when he shut it down and opened
THE UNITED STATES, INC.? And when he bankrupted the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
INC.?
Jeff Berwick "Trump Was Chosen By The Elite. We'll Soon See That He's The Bankers President." Please comment on this video found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9T58nyEL64
On Property, Essay by James Madison 29 Mar. 1792 This term in its particular application means "that dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual." In its larger and juster meaning, it embraces everything to which a man may attach a value and have a right; and which leaves to everyone else the like advantage. In the former sense, a man's land, or merchandize, or money is called his property. In the latter sense, a man has a property in his opinions and the free communication of them. He has a property of peculiar value in his religious opinions, and in the profession and practice dictated by them. He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person. He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to employ them. In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights. Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions. Where there is an excess of liberty, the effect is the same, tho' from an opposite cause. Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own. According to this standard of merit, the praise of affording a just securing to property, should be sparingly bestowed on a government which, however scrupulously guarding the possessions of individuals, does not protect them in the enjoyment and communication of their opinions, in which they have an equal, and in the estimation of some, a more valuable property. More sparingly should this praise be allowed to a government, where a man's religious rights are violated by penalties, or fettered by tests, or taxed by a hierarchy. Conscience is the most sacred of all property; other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that, being a natural and unalienable right. To guard a man's house as his castle, to pay public and enforce private debts with the most exact faith, can give no title to invade a man's conscience which is more sacred than his castle, or to withhold from it that debt of protection, for which the public faith is pledged, by the very nature and original conditions of the social pact. That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where the property which a man has in his personal safety and personal liberty, is violated by arbitrary seizures of one class of citizens for the service of the rest. A magistrate issuing his warrants to a press gang, would be in his proper functions in Turkey or Indostan, under appellations proverbial of the most complete despotism. That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where arbitrary restrictions, exemptions, and monopolies deny to part of its citizens that free use of their faculties, and free choice of their occupations, which not only constitute their property in the general sense of the word; but are the means of acquiring property strictly so called. What must be the spirit of legislation where a manufacturer of linen cloth is forbidden to bury his own child in a linen shroud, in order to favour his neighbour who manufactures woolen cloth; where the manufacturer and wearer of woolen cloth are again forbidden the oeconomical [Volume 1, Page 599] use of buttons of that material, in favor of the manufacturer of buttons of other materials! A just security to property is not afforded by that government, under which unequal taxes oppress one species of property and reward another species: where arbitrary taxes invade the domestic sanctuaries of the rich, and excessive taxes grind the faces of the poor; where the keenness and competitions of want are deemed an insufficient spur to labor, and taxes are again applied, by an unfeeling policy, as another spur; in violation of that sacred property, which Heaven, in decreeing man to earn his bread by the sweat of his brow, kindly reserved to him, in the small repose that could be spared from the supply of his necessities. If there be a government then which prides itself in maintaining the inviolability of property; which provides that none shall be taken directly even for public use without indemnification to the owner, and yet directly violates the property which individuals have in their opinions, their religion, their persons, and their faculties; nay more, which indirectly violates their property, in their actual possessions, in the labor that acquires their daily subsistence, and in the hallowed remnant of time which ought to relieve their fatigues and soothe their cares, the influence [inference?] will have been anticipated, that such a government is not a pattern for the United States. If the United States mean to obtain or deserve the full praise due to wise and just governments, they will equally respect the rights of property, and the property in rights: they will rival the government that most sacredly guards the former; and by repelling its example in violating the latter, will make themselves a pattern to that and all other governments.
The Bible is essentially an Egyptian-retelling of Hebrew history liberally
edited numerous times by groups with axes to grind. What remains is a very
strange book indeed.
Even the name of the Bible is peculiar. The words "Holy Bible" translate
as "Sun Book". Why? Because the Egyptians who created it worshiped a sun god,
Amon Ra, and their object in compiling the Bible was very different from what we
assume.
Didn't it ever strike you as odd that the Hebrews, out there roaming around
in the desert, managed to compile such a record as the Bible presents?
I want all of my readers to read this updated posting from Dr.
Trowbridge. For the past three years he has been dueling with the so-called
"federal courts" which are indeed nothing more than corporate municipal courts
and are not vested with any authority related to us, our states, or our judicial
powers.
Dr. Trowbridge has exposed the seedy underbelly of the "UNITED
STATES" incorporated, which is nothing but a private, for-profit, mostly
foreign-owned governmental services corporation operated by the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) on our shores, and he has also exposed the treasonous "Oath
Tampering" of its Board of Directors, masquerading as members of a legitimate
and lawfully organized "Congress" in 1991.
Indeed, John Parks Trowbridge has fought the good fight.
I have been a big fan of Romley Stewart since I first became aware of him
and the Australian group effort to unmask what has been aptly called The
Justinian Deception (https://justiniandeception.wordpress.com/). I had
over the years researched the use of the ALL CAPS naming conventions and traced
it back to Ancient Rome and even wrote a treatise about it, but Rom focused on
it from a slightly different viewpoint and came up with new insights and
information that completed the picture and also gave us the leverage to overturn
the jurisdiction of the municipal and territorial courts----- that is BIG.
HUGE. That is the difference between knowing you are being bamboozled and being
enabled to do something about it, and Romley Stewart, an Aussie, gave us that.
This points out the interlocking nature of the problem and the process
throughout the English-speaking world. We have all suffered from the same
processes and deceits. So when we find something out in America, you can count
on the fact that the same basic schtick is being employed in Great Britain under
the "UK" and in Canada under "CANADA" and in Australia under the regime of
"AUSTRALIA", too.
As we
learned in Part 18, English is a descriptive rather than factual language, and
yet to be meaningful, only facts count. The rest is gibberish, or
“Babel” as in Tower of Babel, subject to interpretation, context, and “terms of
art” ---and can be easily confused either innocently or on purpose.
This creates a playground for con artists and lawyers.
We are
all familiar with popular and common meanings of words and also familiar with
the use of trade jargon and with the slang meanings of words used in
English. A “pop gun” can refer to a child’s toy or in military
parlance, a small piece of artillery. A “slider” may refer to
homerun in baseball or a miniature hamburger at a diner. A “kid”
can refer to a baby goat or a child. A “doll” may be a toy or a
living woman. A “conveyance” may be a legal document or a rickshaw
or a truck.
The meaning depends on “in what sense” you are using a word, or as
Bill Clinton, the Weasel, famously put it----and I paraphrase, “it depends on
what your definition of “is”, is.”
A short and focused study of English as a descriptive language in comparison to the latin text as translated by the Catholic Church centuries ago. God can not be reduced to a mathematical formula. God can not be limited by His own creation. God is, and he describes Himself as "I am, Who Am".
He always was, and He is now, and He always will be.
Perhaps material things, what we see, feel, hear, touch, etc., and all material creation can be reduced to mathematics, that I don't know, but I ask, how can God, who we can not see, feel, touch, or hear with human ears, most of the time anyway, be reduced to any language that deals in mathematics only, or which can be reduced to a mathematical formula. For that matter, how can any language whatsoever, sufficiently describe the creator of all in any way the mind of man can comprehend completely?
Judging from some of the comments I am getting there are a lot of Newbies
out there. I suggest going to my website at www.annavonreitz.com or buying our
primer, "You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable
Cause".
Religion plays into the discussion because our law derives directly from
our religious and ethical values. Period.
The last few posts I have revealed the (apparently) astounding news that
there are different kinds of law and they all stem from different religions.
Why is that so amazing to so many people?
Hypothecation is a fancy word for fraud. It concerns a purely hypothetical
debt owed by a pure hypothetical corporation. It allows a Third Party to claim
that a corporation named after you and operating under your NAME is standing
good for their debts. It allows them to take title to your body, land, home,
marriage, children, and all else you may have on earth, and use it as collateral
for their debts---- all without telling you or having any valid agreement with
you at all.
So we covered the Law of the Sea, both Maritime and Admiralty, and you know
now that Maritime Law is also called Commercial Law, Roman Civil (or just
"Civil") Law, Maritime Law, and Law Merchant.
You know that Admiralty is distinguished from Maritime in that Admiralty
pertains to military and governmental affairs on the High Seas, while Maritime
concerns itself with civilian transport of goods, services, and "persons" on the
High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. This is the same difference as the
difference between the U.S. Navy and the Merchant Marine Service.
Law is not a good thing simply by its nature. It arises out of religion,
which is supposed to be a matter of freewill, but seldom is, and then it erects
barriers and presumptions based on whatever system of law you are encountering.
All systems of law are essentially rules for the Game of Life, but it is up to
you to choose the rules you are operating under, and that then determines how
you play it.
So let's go over the basics.
In the beginning of recorded history we lived under the Noahide Laws known
as the Law of the Sea. This is the form of law that existed prior to the Flood
and has existed ever afterward. There is no evidence in the standard Bible that
Noah was a lawgiver like Moses, but his name got attached to these laws anyway.
Whether we like is or not, what happens with this does affect our safety. No matter your view of jurisdiction, or sovereignty, this bunch of radical leftist communist activists will have a bearing on your future unless something drastic is done to stop them. They are seditionists, and traitors, and need to be rounded up, but who in this corrupt structure that government has become will have the backbone to do it? The NeoCons will use it to expand the police state and try to suck Trump into supporting the expansion. The leftists will create chaos in the streets. The perfect formula for the final destruction of America in 2017. Paul
ernie is a hoot! He wore his Peace Banner (flag) as a cape, and refused to "cross the bar". The courtroom did not have a bar to designate a citizens area as opposed to the court's area, so ernie presumed that to even go through that door would be in effect "crossing the bar". ernie believes that to cross a court's "bar" is to forfeit one's own rightful jurisdiction.
Ernie Wayne terTelgte, The Montana Natural Man, first gained the attention of patriots across the nation when he amassed millions of views on YouTube with his actions within the Montana court systems. The event that went viral was due to his being arrested for fishing without a license and then resisting arrest. We covered his last court appearance he had for driving without a license. Ernie was arrested last month and has a new Omnibus hearing Thursday January 5th, 2017. We will also be covering this as well. Check back for more video updates. This video brought to you courtesy of Jason Van Tatenhove of Liberty Brothers Radio. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQf3AAg_SWA https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=liberty+brothers+radio http://ex-media.us/ Here is the original video that got over 7 million views. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06VzxxDTnB8 Check back to this blog for updates. The omnibus hearing this morning will be published later today if everything goes right. Ernie is preparing for another hearing in February and refused to enter their jurisdiction again this morning. Quite frankly, they don't quite know what to do with this freedom loving American State national living lawfully on the land jurisdiction in Montana State. To get the whole background of what his stand is based on, as he mentioned in this video, get the book by Anna Von Reitz called "You Know Something is Wrong When.....: An American Affidavit of Probable Cause" at her website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com/order.html
It is summer 2014. For the last ten years the forces of evil have been
marching steadily onward and their plans are all-too apparent. All the
"federal" alphabet soup agencies have been armed to the teeth. Billions of
rounds of ammo have been purchased. The local police have been armed with
tactical weapons and armored vehicles and are swaggering around looking nervous
and fingering Billy Clubs made of Titanium and steel.
Every day reports come in of police brutality, more and more evictions and
foreclosures, over a million children missing from our streets and schools, test
scores in the toilet and then word comes that vast "FEMA Camps" have been built
and stocked and provided with armed guards. There are even rumors of vast
underground bases built over the course of the Cold War, large enough to house
thousands of people, entire cities underground.
The "federal government" dba UNITED STATES, INC., a storefront governmental
services corporation for the IMF, the International Monetary Fund, is preparing
for something Big--- the extermination of its Priority Creditors, the American
People.
The bosses running the UNITED STATES, INC. stand to make at least a million
dollars per dead American as a result of life insurance policies paid for with
their own tax money.
There are some very important things never taught in school. How to be a
good parent is one of them. Another is the Great Frenzy that occurred in the
very early 1700's. And another is the truth about the so-called "American Civil
War".
In the late 1600's the Church lost control --- temporarily --- of the vast
amounts of Spanish gold and silver purloined out of Central and South America
during the previous two centuries. The unthinkable happened when the Laws of
Supply and Demand kicked in and gold and silver were devalued by market forces
just like any other glut on a commodity.
At precisely this moment when gold and silver were grossly, if momentarily,
devalued--- another very odd and important thing happened.
As the US mainstream media
obsessed last week about Russia's supposed “hacking” of the US elections and
President Obama’s final round of Russia sanctions in response, something very
important was taking place under the media radar. As a result of a meeting
between foreign ministers of Russia, Iran, and Turkey last month, a ceasefire in
Syria has been worked out and is being implemented. So far it appears to be
holding, and after nearly six years of horrible warfare the people of Syria are
finally facing the possibility of rebuilding their lives.
What is so
important about this particular ceasefire?
George Washington divided the country into districts for the purpose of
administering the duties of the federal government. He has been accused of
treason for doing so by those who never comprehended the organization of the
government in the first place.
While George's detractors rightfully object that he deployed foreign
government via the districts established upon our shores, they fail to recognize
that the states allowed this by subscribing to the constitutional agreement and
delegating the enumerated powers (which are really services to be rendered by
the federal entity) to the federal government.
Foreign it was and foreign it is, but as long as we adhere to the actual
Constitution, the Federales are allowed to establish their foreign
administrative units, called "districts" as they please.
It's New Year's Eve. Where I am, the skies are leaden grey, the
temperatures cold, and the days are dark. I am holed up like some small furry
animal in a burrow watching the swirling snow and everything is very quiet. The
day has been spent making whatever progress could be made in a mountain of
correspondence and on house cleaning----getting ready to greet 2017 and make a
clean start.
I suppose people don't remember this, but besides being "Judge Anna" I am
also a woman with a house to keep, dust bunnies to chase, and an endless fight
against dog hair that has been ongoing since 1956.
Many great things have happened in 2016. Jural assemblies have been
re-established in many counties and American Common Law courts have begun
functioning again throughout these fifty states. A great many people have
awakened and they are now engaged in awakening others.
There are all sorts of definitions of the word "state", but when we are
talking about government we are talking about either (1) a "non-material
juridical entity" operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea, or,
(2) we are talking about a "material juridical territory that is geographically
defined" on the land.
I keep harping on this until I am blind, so I really, truly do hope that
you are all paying attention.....
Law comes from religion. Religion--- what we believe in, what we consider
to be right and wrong--- defines what "law" we live under. That's the way it is
and the way it has always been.
According to Semiramis (also known as the "Queen of Heaven", the "Great
Abomination", the "Mother of All Whores" and the inventor of idolatry) if you
want to rule over people, all you need is a "pillar and a post".
What you do, is you take one object---- a tall vertical supporting
column--- and you label it a "pillar" and you take another tall vertical
supporting column, and label it a "post", thereby creating a difference between
them.
Even if the difference is merely a name or a label, it is enough to fool
people into thinking a difference exists.
This is the essence of "divide and conquer".
You divide people using the same methods. You apply labels to them and
exploit their differences: black and white, rich and poor, short and tall,
Catholic and Lutheran, Republican and Democrat, Palestinian and Israeli.
This is one of the essential esoteric teachings of Freemasonry worldwide
and it is the foundation plank of the Babylonian Slave System which is now
masquerading as the lawful governments of the world.
Just call it something different.
Exploit the differences.
United States v. United States of America.
But what happens when we wake up like the dumb beasts on Christmas Eve and
decide to look and think and talk?
Anyone who has bothered to listen to news outside the box for the past
several years has heard rumors of vast hordes of "Chinese gold" in Indonesia,
etc., etc.
You've also heard mindless claims that all the gold of Africa got mined and
transported over the Silk Road to China, because, supposedly, the Chinese would
only take gold in trade.
That is all plain out-and-out nonsense. The Chinese traditionally traded
in jade and in food, because then as now, they had a large impoverished
population and relatively little arable land.
The gold in Indonesia is Spanish gold that happens to be under the control
of Chinese people. Ferdinand Marcos was Chinese, not Filipino.
The gold was shipped to Indonesia by Spaniards and by trustees of Spanish
hordes as long ago as the 1400's. Check out the Crown of St. Stephens---- a
bank chartered in the 1400's ---to begin to get a clue of just how active
Spanish (and Catholic) interests have been and for how long.
Some Americans--at least the ones I consort with--- know that the Petro
Dollar was engineered by Kissinger because we are consistently the top EXPORTER
of refined oil products in the world and always have been.
(Get a clue: we are also the main supplier of guns and weapons and "defense
supplies and materials". We never re-tooled our industries for peace time after
World War II. We kept right on chugging out the same old crap and developing
new versions of it and promoting wars for profit all over the world.)
Other Americans think that we are in constant dire need of oil and can
never get enough oil----- and don't make the distinction between crude oil ----
the raw material that we can't get enough of, and refined oil products--- which
we can't offload fast enough.
"Let us therefore make him a little chamber, and put a little bed in it for him and a table, and a stool, and a candlestick, that when he cometh to us, he may abide there" (IV Kings 4:13). Such was the Sunamite woman's regard for the prophet Eliseus, that she would make such preparations for his entertainment! Will we do as much for Christ who is ready to come to us? Take pains, O Christian, to occupy this night in pious thoughts, and aspirations, for the love of God and for the good of your own soul, making yourself worthy to receive the graces which He is ready when He comes, to give you. Think how Mary, who was near her time, and Joseph her spouse obedient to the Imperial command, and perfectly submissive to the will of God, journeyed with the greatest inconvenience to Bethlehem, and when, because of the multitude of people, they found no place to receive them they took refuge, as God willed it, in a most miserable stable, at the extreme end of the town. What love does not the Savior deserve, who for love of us so humbled Himself!
COLLECT O God, who makest us rejoice in the yearly expectation of the feast of our redemption: grant, that we who cheerfully receive Thy only-begotten Son as a Redeemer, may behold without fear the same Lord Jesus Christ, coming as our judge. Through our Lord.
Thanks to George Hudson for sending this out. Paul Stramer Dear
Friends and Patriots,
Dorothy
and I traveled to the Nevada Southern Detention Center in Pahrump over the
weekend to visit five Idaho inmates, Ammon Bundy, Scott Drexler, Eric Parker,
Steven Stewart and Todd Engel. Ammon and Scott are Dorothy’s constituents in
District 8. This is a very difficult time for these men to be away from family
and loved ones as they spend Christmas alone with little console.
We
found the men to be mostly in good spirits but under duress and living under
very unpleasant circumstances. 96 inmates share a common cell, two stack bunk
beds 4” apart, open showers and toilets. There is no privacy whatsoever. There
is little more than a dog run for limited exercise. Inmates get 1 hour per week
to converse with a visitor over a video phone. They might as well have been in
Afghanistan. We talked to each man getting their story, asking what we could do
for them. The weekend was emotionally draining for Dorothy and I, yet we faced
none of the foreboding unknown. Dorothy and I are both convinced that their
incarceration is a miscarriage of justice that must be corrected.
I
know many of you to be patriots concerned about our country and what remains of
optimistic opportunities once realized on the rugged and untamed Western lands.
These men are political prisoners who will pay a horrible price if we do not act
on their behalf. They have been falsely accused under the guise of domestic
terrorism when in fact they were defending their right to assemble and redress
the government under 1st Amendment guarantees.
I was
shocked to discover how under-handed the authorities in charge of this case have
proceeded. Not unlike any tin pot dictator’s decree, evidence that would shed
light on the true disposition of this case has been sealed by Judge Navarra,
(selected by Harry Reid for an Obama appointment). Damning evidence that would
disclose the government’s true agenda while exposing their unjust zeal to lock
away these witnesses of the truth forever.
Charges
have been levied that would send these men to prison for life including
conspiracy against the government and criminal violence. For such alleged
crimes, the accused have been remanded without bail to prison as dangerous and
possible flight risks. Interesting that it took the government about two years
to come to that conclusion. The stand-off occurred in 2014, their incarceration
was in March of this year.
The
judge has divided the cases into three trials. The Idaho “gunmen” include, Eric
Parker, Scott Drexler, Todd Engel and Steven Stewart who are in the first tier
set for February 6, 2017. I plan to attend the trial in Las Vegas with one of
my sons. I hope that you can be there too if only for moral support.
Ammon,
Ryan and Cliven Bundy will be among those in the second trial due in May and the
rest in August.
We
hope to get a State Attorney General whose constituents are affected by this
case to open the sealed documents and bring transparency. You can help too,
please write your displeasure with this perversion of justice directly to
President Elect Trump at the links below:
Please
watch the historical overview video below. This is the first of three such
testimonials from Ammon Bundy. I will forward the others as they appear and link
to my Facebook page so you can share accordingly.
The
following is a video put together by Eric Parker that adds structural context to
the events and the upcoming trial.
Your
thoughts and prayers are appreciated for these men who stood their ground in
defense of property rights. Please help them the best you can and support the
producers of the above videos.
In
Liberty,
Darr
& Dorothy Moon
Letters
can be sent to any detainee at: Nevada Southern Detention Center, 2190 E.
Mesquite Avenue, Pahrump, NV 89060. Please help lift their
spirits.
Donations
can be made to help with legal costs to: Bundy Defense Fund, P.O. Box 7175,
Bunkerville, NV 89007
Mr. Trump, you need to get a big education and quick. You need to talk to people like Ron Paul, Dr. Edwin Vieira Jr., Stewart Rhodes, and Anna Von Reitz, and you need to figure out who your real enemies are. Do it yesterday, and stop appointing banksters to positions of power.
Paul Stramer
One of our readers forwarded this. Thanks
Jeff.
I thought it was worth a look, and I would
like your comments.
If you think this is right, and you need
to make some preparations: www.fm2way.com
Paul Stramer KC7MEZ WQVW245
SLC
Distributing
PO Box 116
Eureka MT 59917
800 889 2839 pstramer@eurekadsl.net
montanablog
dot us
Brandon Smith Warns
the System Is Crashing: “Prepare for Bank Confiscations, Shortages,
Insurgency”
For those who have been following along, it must eventually occur to them
to ask: well, then, who or what is the real enemy?
If Britain and the Holy See---which were supposed to be our Trustees and
Allies--- are actually our enemies, then who are our friends? The Russians?
The Chinese?
