Ron Paul wins Idaho Republican Party Straw Poll !
Idaho Republicans have overwhelmingly supported Ron Paul.
Vote in the poll at the end of this article below and then look at the results. This type of thing makes me wonder about the integrity of the media. The media would lead you to think Ron Paul is struggling to stay in the front of the pack. It looks to me like he is "a touch" ahead of the pack.
I encourage you to forward this article. I am afraid it is up to us to get this news out.
http://www.thestatecolumn.com/articles/ron-paul-wins-idaho-gop-straw-poll/
Mark French
PO Box 178
Paradise, MT 59856
Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress
You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.

Saturday, January 7, 2012
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Just to remind myself
This is on my livingroom wall
The time is almost here when the government won't let us live in peace.

This post was published entirely from my smartphone.
Be warned agents of government, that if I find you breaking your oath of office and I can get a picture of you doing so, that picture and a comment along with date, time and place will be published instantly from my smartphone to this blog for the whole world to see. So mind your oath well and protect the rights of the people that pay your salary with their hard earned tax dollars.
Consider yourself put on notice that you work for US, not the other way around.
If you don't know what it takes to keep your oath read this website:
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/
The time is almost here when the government won't let us live in peace.
This post was published entirely from my smartphone.
Be warned agents of government, that if I find you breaking your oath of office and I can get a picture of you doing so, that picture and a comment along with date, time and place will be published instantly from my smartphone to this blog for the whole world to see. So mind your oath well and protect the rights of the people that pay your salary with their hard earned tax dollars.
Consider yourself put on notice that you work for US, not the other way around.
If you don't know what it takes to keep your oath read this website:
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
The Two-Minute Case for Ron Paul
Why should Americans vote for Ron Paul?
Bestselling author Thomas Woods gives a two-minute case for Ron Paul, with the partial aim of helping Ron Paul caucus-goers give an effective speech for him. http://www.TomWoods.com
Bestselling author Thomas Woods gives a two-minute case for Ron Paul, with the partial aim of helping Ron Paul caucus-goers give an effective speech for him. http://www.TomWoods.com
Monday, January 2, 2012
Ron Paul: Indefinite Detention Act (NDAA) Is Very Dangerous
Have you heard this NDAA is not dangerous?
Then you need to watch this movie all the way through.
Then make sure to send everyone this link so they can watch and spread this video far and wide. The US congress has just declared WAR on the American people!
This movie just about puts a wrap on this issue once and for all. Watch the imposter so called "president" use this new power and become the first dictator of Amerika! He is already a communist.
This will confirm it. This will start a new civil war for America's Freedom when they try to implement it.
This is NOT LAW at all, and needs to be treated as such by the American people.
Read about what is law and what is not here:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2011/12/corporation-of-united-states-of-america.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2011/10/power-of-county-sheriff-stands-supreme.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/12/grand-jury-idea-whose-time-has-come.html
Paul Stramer
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Then you need to watch this movie all the way through.
Then make sure to send everyone this link so they can watch and spread this video far and wide. The US congress has just declared WAR on the American people!
This movie just about puts a wrap on this issue once and for all. Watch the imposter so called "president" use this new power and become the first dictator of Amerika! He is already a communist.
This will confirm it. This will start a new civil war for America's Freedom when they try to implement it.
This is NOT LAW at all, and needs to be treated as such by the American people.
Read about what is law and what is not here:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2011/12/corporation-of-united-states-of-america.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2011/10/power-of-county-sheriff-stands-supreme.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/12/grand-jury-idea-whose-time-has-come.html
Paul Stramer
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Obama Signs Martial Law Bill: NDAA Now Law
Uploaded by TheAlexJonesChannel on Dec 31, 2011
President Obama who pledged to veto the National Defense Authorization Act has signed it. Of course his promise was only for public consumption. After all lying to your enemy is what invading corporate takeover army's do. It was the Obama administration all along that demanded the indefinite detention provisions be added while at the same time telling the America people he was fighting to protect their rights. This is treason on parade,in your face all out despotism!
Sunday, January 1, 2012
Friday, December 30, 2011
Fox News finally says Ron Paul is a frontrunner 12/28/11
We knew this was coming. The establishment just can't stand Ron Paul because he exposes their backroom deals, and that goes especially for the big government Republican wing of the Republicrat party.
A way to end all taxation? Think it can't be done? Think again
CAFR1 NATIONAL POST
For or against, the person running for public office should be required by you and all that you know to make mention on their website; news-letters; and emails lists of the following. Silence in this matter is confirmation of being part of a syndicate that is extremely contrary to the population's interests. Your and that candidate's action and reply for public viewing is not just essential, it should be required by you and all that you know:
What is your view point on the following and will you go public with it?
About CAFR1 - Government's Wealth Exposed
Government now owns it all by investment!
1. What is Taxation? ANS: A revenue source.
2. What is Investment Return? ANS: A revenue Source.
3. What do Enterprise operations do? ANS: Generate a revenue Source.
ANSWER to the Big question of ending taxation?
Use "2" & "3" to knock out "1"
TRF management teams can eliminate taxation one venue at a time.
* Pension management accounts are established to pay salaries and benefits at retirement from the investment return generated.
** TRF management accounts are established to pay local government (City; County; School District; State) general purpose operating costs from the investment and Enterprise return generated. Taxation ended!
Ready to make it happen? If the answer is yes, then pass the WORD and let the cognitive thinking for effective application of the TRF begin!
"The Only Game in Town - 2011" is the only game the population should be playing; The path to ending ALL taxation!
From an American Voter and a Voter who WILL make a difference!
Sent FYI and for your action from,
Walter Burien - CAFR1
P. O. Box 2112
Saint Johns, AZ 85936
Tel. (928) 458-5854
-------FOOTER NOTE------
Per understanding CAFRs, people have been intentionally kept in the dark so long they forget the basics:
1. A "Budget Report" is a selective funding of x accounts from x re sources (set up to be primarily funded with taxation and done so "for the year")
2. An "Annual Financial Report" is the showing of "all" income: Investment; taxation; and Enterprise, plus the "accumulated wealth over decades. Budgets are for the year, an AFR is for it all since creation of the entity.
There is a big difference between the two. A correct analogy would be: The budget to operate your house vs. your statement of net worth.
The public has been played with the biggest shell game of selective p resentation there is allowing for massive fortunes to be made by the inside players over the last several decades..
Every investment fund large and small is a power base. Where that money is invested determines what company; real-estate venture, etc., is made or broken. Thus in line with that, never a mention of the 184,000 AFRs of the corresponding local governments..nor the many thousands of specialty investment funds they contain. I note gov pension funds facilitate the same. Paying employee benefits from the return on the funds is an after thought for the government players.
The head communists back in the 30's and 40's said they could take over Am erica without firming a shot. The undercurrents of that statement were that they could depend on the greed and opportunity of the players to accomplish that goal and it did. US Collective government since 2000 brings in more gross income than the entire gross income of the population of the United States.
Taxation is rammed down the public's throat (1/3rd of the gross income) and Investment / Enterprise income (2/3rd of the gross income) the "silence is golden" rule is strictly enforced with the full symbiotic cooperation of the syndicated media; controlled education; and both political parties as applies over the last century.
For or against, the person running for public office should be required by you and all that you know to make mention on their website; news-letters; and emails lists of the following. Silence in this matter is confirmation of being part of a syndicate that is extremely contrary to the population's interests. Your and that candidate's action and reply for public viewing is not just essential, it should be required by you and all that you know:
What is your view point on the following and will you go public with it?
About CAFR1 - Government's Wealth Exposed
Government now owns it all by investment!
1. What is Taxation? ANS: A revenue source.
2. What is Investment Return? ANS: A revenue Source.
3. What do Enterprise operations do? ANS: Generate a revenue Source.
ANSWER to the Big question of ending taxation?
Use "2" & "3" to knock out "1"
TRF management teams can eliminate taxation one venue at a time.
* Pension management accounts are established to pay salaries and benefits at retirement from the investment return generated.
** TRF management accounts are established to pay local government (City; County; School District; State) general purpose operating costs from the investment and Enterprise return generated. Taxation ended!
Ready to make it happen? If the answer is yes, then pass the WORD and let the cognitive thinking for effective application of the TRF begin!
"The Only Game in Town - 2011" is the only game the population should be playing; The path to ending ALL taxation!
From an American Voter and a Voter who WILL make a difference!
Sent FYI and for your action from,
Walter Burien - CAFR1
P. O. Box 2112
Saint Johns, AZ 85936
Tel. (928) 458-5854
-------FOOTER NOTE------
Per understanding CAFRs, people have been intentionally kept in the dark so long they forget the basics:
1. A "Budget Report" is a selective funding of x accounts from x re sources (set up to be primarily funded with taxation and done so "for the year")
2. An "Annual Financial Report" is the showing of "all" income: Investment; taxation; and Enterprise, plus the "accumulated wealth over decades. Budgets are for the year, an AFR is for it all since creation of the entity.
There is a big difference between the two. A correct analogy would be: The budget to operate your house vs. your statement of net worth.
The public has been played with the biggest shell game of selective p resentation there is allowing for massive fortunes to be made by the inside players over the last several decades..
Every investment fund large and small is a power base. Where that money is invested determines what company; real-estate venture, etc., is made or broken. Thus in line with that, never a mention of the 184,000 AFRs of the corresponding local governments..nor the many thousands of specialty investment funds they contain. I note gov pension funds facilitate the same. Paying employee benefits from the return on the funds is an after thought for the government players.
The head communists back in the 30's and 40's said they could take over Am erica without firming a shot. The undercurrents of that statement were that they could depend on the greed and opportunity of the players to accomplish that goal and it did. US Collective government since 2000 brings in more gross income than the entire gross income of the population of the United States.
Taxation is rammed down the public's throat (1/3rd of the gross income) and Investment / Enterprise income (2/3rd of the gross income) the "silence is golden" rule is strictly enforced with the full symbiotic cooperation of the syndicated media; controlled education; and both political parties as applies over the last century.
Ron Paul on WHO Iowa Radio 12/29/11
If you really want to get some insight into what Dr. Paul really believes listen to his interview and interaction with callers on this radio show.
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Bachmann's campaign manager quits and joins Ron Paul
Ron Paul continues to gain ground in Iowa and now will have Kent Sorenson, Bachmann's former campaign manager for Iowa and a state Senator involved in his campaign.
http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Michele+Bachmann+Iowa+manager+defects+Paul/5923331/story.html
This is a stunning blow to Bachmann's campaign and shows the handwriting on the wall for a Ron Paul victory in Iowa. The issues are what drives the Paul campaign and the invectives of his opponents just serve to increase his popularity. Was it P.T. Barnum that said "Any publicity is good publicity" ?
In any case the Paul campaign continues to be on top and positioned for a victory that will be a real upset for the Republicrat machine.
http://www.wtol.com/story/16409187/bacjmans-campaign-manager-jumps-ship-supports-paul
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20111229/NEWS/312290071/?odyssey=nav%7Chead
Ron Paul effects an ever widening gap on issues between himself and all the other "Republican candidates".
His platform stands alone, but embodies old school solidly Republican ideas from the Reagan / Goldwater era, and better, from the founders ideas and the founding documents. This draws a striking contrast with the "Neo-Con" big government so called "Republicans" of today who are no more than a right wing of the Big Government party with socialists and Democrats all believing that government must solve all the countries' problems.
http://www.freep.com/article/20111229/NEWS07/112290413/Ron-Paul-latest-target-of-GOP-rivals-as-he-climbs-in-polls-among-Iowa-voters
http://www.twincities.com/ci_19635600
A search on the main google page for just the names of various candidates yields the following results:
Mitt Romney 33,600,000
Newt Gingrich 368,000,000
Michelle Bachmann 3,490,000
Rick Santorum 61,600,000
Rick Perry 13,800,000
But when you search Ron Paul it gets 531,000,000 results in less than one half second.
http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Michele+Bachmann+Iowa+manager+defects+Paul/5923331/story.html
This is a stunning blow to Bachmann's campaign and shows the handwriting on the wall for a Ron Paul victory in Iowa. The issues are what drives the Paul campaign and the invectives of his opponents just serve to increase his popularity. Was it P.T. Barnum that said "Any publicity is good publicity" ?
In any case the Paul campaign continues to be on top and positioned for a victory that will be a real upset for the Republicrat machine.
http://www.wtol.com/story/16409187/bacjmans-campaign-manager-jumps-ship-supports-paul
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20111229/NEWS/312290071/?odyssey=nav%7Chead
Ron Paul effects an ever widening gap on issues between himself and all the other "Republican candidates".
His platform stands alone, but embodies old school solidly Republican ideas from the Reagan / Goldwater era, and better, from the founders ideas and the founding documents. This draws a striking contrast with the "Neo-Con" big government so called "Republicans" of today who are no more than a right wing of the Big Government party with socialists and Democrats all believing that government must solve all the countries' problems.
http://www.freep.com/article/20111229/NEWS07/112290413/Ron-Paul-latest-target-of-GOP-rivals-as-he-climbs-in-polls-among-Iowa-voters
http://www.twincities.com/ci_19635600
A search on the main google page for just the names of various candidates yields the following results:
Mitt Romney 33,600,000
Newt Gingrich 368,000,000
Michelle Bachmann 3,490,000
Rick Santorum 61,600,000
Rick Perry 13,800,000
But when you search Ron Paul it gets 531,000,000 results in less than one half second.
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
US Law Enforcement should take a stand for freedom!
Oath-Keeper Stewart Rhodes on the Rise of Authoritarianism and How US Law Enforcement Can Take a Stand for Freedom
http://thedailybell.com/1541/Oath-Keeper-Stewart-Rhodes-on-the-Rise-of-Authoritarianism-and-How-US-Law-Enforcement-Can-Take-a-Stand-for-Freedom.html
Introduction: E. Stewart Rhodes is the founder and President of the growing, national non-profit organization Oath Keepers. The group supports members (current and former U.S. military and law enforcement) in efforts to uphold the Constitution of the United States should they be ordered to violate it. The Oath Keepers' motto is "Not On Our Watch!" Both sides of his family have a long tradition of military service. Nearly all of his uncles on both sides of the family served in the Army or Marine Corps during WWII, Korea, and Vietnam, and his father served as a Marine. After the Army, Stewart graduated Summa Cum Laude from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, where his honor thesis focused on the political theory of James Madison. After college he worked on Rep. Ron Paul's (R, TX) DC staff. Stewart graduated from Yale Law School in 2004, where his paper, "Solving the Puzzle of Enemy Combatant Status" won Yale's Judge William E. Miller Prize for best paper on the Bill of Rights.
Daily Bell: Give us something about your background. Where did you grow up and go to school?
Stewart Rhodes: I grew up partly in California, where my mother's side of the family were migrant farm workers, and partly in Nevada. After my service in the Army I worked as a professional sculptor and firearms instructor in Las Vegas, and I attended UNLV. I then worked for Congressman Ron Paul and then attended Yale Law School.
++++++++++++++++++++
This interview is critically important for America and deserves wide circulation. Please send this link to the article far and wide. http://www.paulstramer.net/2011/12/us-law-enforcement-should-take-stand.html
http://thedailybell.com/1541/Oath-Keeper-Stewart-Rhodes-on-the-Rise-of-Authoritarianism-and-How-US-Law-Enforcement-Can-Take-a-Stand-for-Freedom.html
Sunday, November 21, 2010, with Anthony Wile The Daily Bell is pleased to present an exclusive interview with E. Stewart Rhodes (right). | ![]() |
Daily Bell: Give us something about your background. Where did you grow up and go to school?
Stewart Rhodes: I grew up partly in California, where my mother's side of the family were migrant farm workers, and partly in Nevada. After my service in the Army I worked as a professional sculptor and firearms instructor in Las Vegas, and I attended UNLV. I then worked for Congressman Ron Paul and then attended Yale Law School.
++++++++++++++++++++
This interview is critically important for America and deserves wide circulation. Please send this link to the article far and wide. http://www.paulstramer.net/2011/12/us-law-enforcement-should-take-stand.html
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Ron Paul: The Movie
A collection of Ron Paul clips from various sources. A great primer for anyone who wants to begin to learn more about Ron Paul and the message of liberty.
Montanans Launch Recall of Senators Who Approved NDAA Military Detention. Merry Christmas, US Senate
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/25/1048711/-Montanans-Launch-Recalls-of-Senators-Who-Approved-NDAA-Military-Detention-Merry-Christmas-US-Senate
by Ralph Lopez
UPDATE 12/26/2011:
This is from a statement from Stewart Rhodes of Oathkeepers regarding Republican Denny Rehberg as a target of recall, who also voted for NDAA.
"Here in Montana, while we will go after all three violators of the Bill of Rights, I will place special emphasis and "focus of effort" on Denny Rehberg, since he is so fond of wrapping himself in the flag and claiming to be defending the Constitution while his votes do the exact opposite. In that sense, Rehberg is much like John McCain and Lindsey Graham, two Republicans who, right along with Carl Levin and Joseph Lieberman, are leading a sustained and relentless assault on our Bill of Rights."
From the press release:
Moving quickly on Christmas Day after the US Senate voted 86 - 14 to pass the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 (NDAA) which allows for the indefinite military detention of American citizens without charge or trial, Montanans have announced the launch of recall campaigns against Senators Max Baucus and Jonathan Tester, who voted for the bill. ......
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/25/1048711/-Montanans-Launch-Recalls-of-Senators-Who-Approved-NDAA-Military-Detention-Merry-Christmas-US-Senate
by Ralph Lopez
UPDATE 12/26/2011:
This is from a statement from Stewart Rhodes of Oathkeepers regarding Republican Denny Rehberg as a target of recall, who also voted for NDAA.
"Here in Montana, while we will go after all three violators of the Bill of Rights, I will place special emphasis and "focus of effort" on Denny Rehberg, since he is so fond of wrapping himself in the flag and claiming to be defending the Constitution while his votes do the exact opposite. In that sense, Rehberg is much like John McCain and Lindsey Graham, two Republicans who, right along with Carl Levin and Joseph Lieberman, are leading a sustained and relentless assault on our Bill of Rights."
From the press release:
Moving quickly on Christmas Day after the US Senate voted 86 - 14 to pass the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 (NDAA) which allows for the indefinite military detention of American citizens without charge or trial, Montanans have announced the launch of recall campaigns against Senators Max Baucus and Jonathan Tester, who voted for the bill. ...
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/25/1048711/-Montanans-Launch-Recalls-of-Senators-Who-Approved-NDAA-Military-Detention-Merry-Christmas-US-Senate
This blog now hooked to our twitter account and feedburner
You can now follow us on Twitter or subscribe in a reader.
RSS feed for your reader is here: http://feeds.feedburner.com/http/paulstramerfeedburnercom
Our Twitter account is here: https://twitter.com/#!/pstramer
Hope this is helpful for your ability to keep informed and inform your friends and neighbors.
RSS feed for your reader is here: http://feeds.feedburner.com/http/paulstramerfeedburnercom
Our Twitter account is here: https://twitter.com/#!/pstramer
Hope this is helpful for your ability to keep informed and inform your friends and neighbors.
Who is Barack Obama "The Invisible Man"
http://www.rense.com/general95/Obama-InvisibleManFinal1.pdf
This is the most comprehensive article I have read on the subject of Obama's background. It pretty much answers the question of why he has spent so much money covering up his history and life.
http://www.rense.com/general95/Obama-InvisibleManFinal1.pdf
This is the most comprehensive article I have read on the subject of Obama's background. It pretty much answers the question of why he has spent so much money covering up his history and life.
http://www.rense.com/general95/Obama-InvisibleManFinal1.pdf
Porter Stansberry finally gets it. "The Corruption of America"
Here is Porter Stansberry's latest article and it's a blockbuster for him.
I don't always agree with him after being a subscriber to his newsletter for a year, but this article is his best one yet.
THE CORRUPTION OF AMERICA
by Porter Stansberry
http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pub/reports/201112PSI_issue.html
This is a hard money analysis of where we are and how we got here that will go far in waking up everyone you know, and he wants it spread far a wide. No copyright on this one so forward it to everyone on your lists.
I don't always agree with him after being a subscriber to his newsletter for a year, but this article is his best one yet.
THE CORRUPTION OF AMERICA
by Porter Stansberry
http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pub/reports/201112PSI_issue.html
This is a hard money analysis of where we are and how we got here that will go far in waking up everyone you know, and he wants it spread far a wide. No copyright on this one so forward it to everyone on your lists.
ARE FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS HEADED TO FEMA CAMPS?
Here is another article that seems to confirm from some that the FEMA camps are being fired up.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Hodges/dave117.htm
"Unquestionably, Americans, who dare to speak out against the emerging military dictatorship within our country, will soon be taking up a new residence at your neighborhood FEMA camp.
Through the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), CONgress, complete with their 9% public approval rating, has declared war upon the American people. "
http://www.newswithviews.com/Hodges/dave117.htm
"Unquestionably, Americans, who dare to speak out against the emerging military dictatorship within our country, will soon be taking up a new residence at your neighborhood FEMA camp.
Through the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), CONgress, complete with their 9% public approval rating, has declared war upon the American people. "
Monday, December 26, 2011
Unlimited detention of Americans without due process
OVERLOOKED LANGUAGE IN NDAA (H.R. 1540 & S. 1867)
By: Devvy
December 26, 2011
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd519.htm
The Internet has been literally burning up over the National Defense Authorization Act. Another monstrous bill with language that has produced headlines like: "Obama is going to ship Americans to Gitmo!!!" And, "Americans will be detained indefinitely in secret without due process!!!!" There is this dire prediction:
Storing 7 Days of Food Could Send You to Gitmo Indefinitely
"The real danger lies in the government's definition of what a suspected terrorist is.
Read the entire article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd519.htm
"A provision of S. 1867, or the National Defense Authorization Act bill, written by Senators John McCain and Carl Levin, declares American soil a battlefield and allows the President and all future Chief Executives to order the military to arrest and detain American citizens, innocent or not, without charge or trial. In other words, if this bill passes and the President signs it, OWS protesters or any American could end up arrested and indefinitely locked up by the military without the guaranteed right to due process or a speedy trial."
By: Devvy
December 26, 2011
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd519.htm
The Internet has been literally burning up over the National Defense Authorization Act. Another monstrous bill with language that has produced headlines like: "Obama is going to ship Americans to Gitmo!!!" And, "Americans will be detained indefinitely in secret without due process!!!!" There is this dire prediction:
Storing 7 Days of Food Could Send You to Gitmo Indefinitely
"The real danger lies in the government's definition of what a suspected terrorist is.
Read the entire article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd519.htm
"A provision of S. 1867, or the National Defense Authorization Act bill, written by Senators John McCain and Carl Levin, declares American soil a battlefield and allows the President and all future Chief Executives to order the military to arrest and detain American citizens, innocent or not, without charge or trial. In other words, if this bill passes and the President signs it, OWS protesters or any American could end up arrested and indefinitely locked up by the military without the guaranteed right to due process or a speedy trial."
Montanans Launch Recall of Senators Who Approved NDAA Military Detention
Montana law expressly provides for the recall of US Senators for violation of their oath of office and other crimes.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?342222-Montanans-Launch-Recall-of-Senators-Who-Approved-NDAA-Military-Detention.-Merry-Christmas
Montana is one of nine states with provisions that say that the right of recall extends to recalling members of its federal congressional delegation, pursuant to Montana Code 2-16-603, on the grounds of physical or mental lack of fitness, incompetence, violation of oath of office, official misconduct, or conviction of certain felony offenses.
Section 2 of Montana Code 2-16-603 reads:
"(2) A public officer holding an elective office may be recalled by the qualified electors entitled to vote for the elective officer's successor."
The website Ballotpedia.org cites eight other states which allow for the recall of elected federal officials: Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, and Wisconsin. New Jersey's federal recall law was struck down when a NJ state judge ruled that "the federal Constitution does not allow states the power to recall U.S. senators," despite the fact the Constitution explicitly allows, by not disallowing ("prohibited" in the Tenth Amendment,) the states the power to recall US senators and congressmen:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?342222-Montanans-Launch-Recall-of-Senators-Who-Approved-NDAA-Military-Detention.-Merry-Christmas
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?342222-Montanans-Launch-Recall-of-Senators-Who-Approved-NDAA-Military-Detention.-Merry-Christmas
Montana is one of nine states with provisions that say that the right of recall extends to recalling members of its federal congressional delegation, pursuant to Montana Code 2-16-603, on the grounds of physical or mental lack of fitness, incompetence, violation of oath of office, official misconduct, or conviction of certain felony offenses.
Section 2 of Montana Code 2-16-603 reads:
"(2) A public officer holding an elective office may be recalled by the qualified electors entitled to vote for the elective officer's successor."
The website Ballotpedia.org cites eight other states which allow for the recall of elected federal officials: Arizona, Colorado, Louisiana, Michigan, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, and Wisconsin. New Jersey's federal recall law was struck down when a NJ state judge ruled that "the federal Constitution does not allow states the power to recall U.S. senators," despite the fact the Constitution explicitly allows, by not disallowing ("prohibited" in the Tenth Amendment,) the states the power to recall US senators and congressmen:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?342222-Montanans-Launch-Recall-of-Senators-Who-Approved-NDAA-Military-Detention.-Merry-Christmas
U.S. Agents Launder Mexican Profits of Drug Cartels
The history of a Federal Conspiracy to end Freedom and Liberty in America and replace them with a police state.
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/19/new-york-times-u-s-agents-launder-mexican-profits-of-drug-cartels/
By Ginger ThompsonPublished: December 3, 2011
WASHINGTON — Undercover American narcotics agents have laundered or smuggled millions of dollars in drug proceeds as part of Washington’s expanding role in Mexico’s fight against drug cartels, according to current and former federal law enforcement officials.
The agents, primarily with the Drug Enforcement Administration, have handled shipments of hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal cash across borders, those officials said, to identify how criminal organizations move their money, where they keep their assets and, most important, who their leaders are.
Read the entire article here:
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/19/new-york-times-u-s-agents-launder-mexican-profits-of-drug-cartels/
The War on Drugs has eviscerated the Bill of Rights in our Constitution and has assaulted the spirit and letter of the U.S. Constitution. The War on Drugs is un-Constitutional on its face, and has been used to weaken our Constitutional protections for American citizens, while at the same time damaging the sovereignty of the several autonomous nation-state Republics which are party to the compact which created the Federal Union.
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/19/new-york-times-u-s-agents-launder-mexican-profits-of-drug-cartels/
By Ginger ThompsonPublished: December 3, 2011
WASHINGTON — Undercover American narcotics agents have laundered or smuggled millions of dollars in drug proceeds as part of Washington’s expanding role in Mexico’s fight against drug cartels, according to current and former federal law enforcement officials.
The agents, primarily with the Drug Enforcement Administration, have handled shipments of hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal cash across borders, those officials said, to identify how criminal organizations move their money, where they keep their assets and, most important, who their leaders are.
Read the entire article here:
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/19/new-york-times-u-s-agents-launder-mexican-profits-of-drug-cartels/
The War on Drugs has eviscerated the Bill of Rights in our Constitution and has assaulted the spirit and letter of the U.S. Constitution. The War on Drugs is un-Constitutional on its face, and has been used to weaken our Constitutional protections for American citizens, while at the same time damaging the sovereignty of the several autonomous nation-state Republics which are party to the compact which created the Federal Union.
Saturday, December 24, 2011
Upon Release of Martial Law Documents, The Plan For America’s Destruction Becomes Apparent
Judge for yourself, but follow up first to make sure you have the right information.
http://theintelhub.com/2011/12/23/upon-release-of-martial-law-documents-the-plan-for-america’s-destruction-becomes-apparent/
On Wednesday, December 21, Infowars.com published a brand new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) document dated November 18, 2011, that “that show military involvement in a FEMA-led takeover within the United States under partially-classified Continuity of Government (COG) plans,” and designate “the American people as ‘enemies’ under a live military tracking system known as Blue Force Situational Awareness (BFSA).”
+++++++++++++++++++
We are not saying these evil people are smart to do this, just very evil, and they will suffer the consequences of their evil, maybe sooner than they think.
God will NOT be mocked.
Paul
http://theintelhub.com/2011/12/23/upon-release-of-martial-law-documents-the-plan-for-america’s-destruction-becomes-apparent/
On Wednesday, December 21, Infowars.com published a brand new Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) document dated November 18, 2011, that “that show military involvement in a FEMA-led takeover within the United States under partially-classified Continuity of Government (COG) plans,” and designate “the American people as ‘enemies’ under a live military tracking system known as Blue Force Situational Awareness (BFSA).”
+++++++++++++++++++
We are not saying these evil people are smart to do this, just very evil, and they will suffer the consequences of their evil, maybe sooner than they think.
God will NOT be mocked.
Paul
Bring the troops home from everywhere! Stop the Wars
Ron Paul is right. We have no business being there!
There is NO JUSTIFICATION. These are NOT just wars.
Read St. Thomas Aquinas, perhaps one of the world's most revered minds in all of history about what may justify a war: http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3040.htm
Friday, December 23, 2011
How Ron Paul can restore Constitutional government and common law!
The courts say we have no standing on many issues of national security like Obama's eligibility and others.
What do they base that ruling on? How do they get away with not allowing any "constitutional arguments" in the courts?
This article not only traces the legal history of how it was done, but shows a solution that is very possible if Ron Paul were elected.
http://codgerville.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/american-dictatorship/
Even though what was done might be "legal" the question remains if it was LAWFUL. The lawful part of the question may be unanswered at this point, but the Supreme court seems to have answered whether government is still bound by the US Constitution in the Mack/Printz decision.
Read the decision here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1478.ZO.html
Get the video "The Power of the County Sheriff to Stop Tyranny" about what the Mack/Printz decision means from our video site here: http://www.redwhiteandbluebox.com/ Just $1 each on DVD
The Power of the County Sheriff to Stop Tyranny, and The Solution to Real Homeland Security
This new movie from Lincoln County Watch featuring former Sheriff Richard Mack and Oathkeepers founder Stewart Rhodes outline both of their very successful programs to wake up active duty military, veterans, peace officers and Sheriffs across this land, and help them keep their oath to the Constitution. Brand new on July 29th, 2011.
There is no better solution than the county sheriff standing up for the oath they took.
Every Sheriff should attend the Constitutional Sheriff's Convention in January 2012.
Peace Officers Uniting to End State and Federal Tyranny
Las Vegas, NV, Jan 29-31, 2012 http://www.sheriffmack.com/
What do they base that ruling on? How do they get away with not allowing any "constitutional arguments" in the courts?
This article not only traces the legal history of how it was done, but shows a solution that is very possible if Ron Paul were elected.
http://codgerville.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/american-dictatorship/
Even though what was done might be "legal" the question remains if it was LAWFUL. The lawful part of the question may be unanswered at this point, but the Supreme court seems to have answered whether government is still bound by the US Constitution in the Mack/Printz decision.
Read the decision here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1478.ZO.html
Get the video "The Power of the County Sheriff to Stop Tyranny" about what the Mack/Printz decision means from our video site here: http://www.redwhiteandbluebox.com/ Just $1 each on DVD
The Power of the County Sheriff to Stop Tyranny, and The Solution to Real Homeland Security
This new movie from Lincoln County Watch featuring former Sheriff Richard Mack and Oathkeepers founder Stewart Rhodes outline both of their very successful programs to wake up active duty military, veterans, peace officers and Sheriffs across this land, and help them keep their oath to the Constitution. Brand new on July 29th, 2011.
There is no better solution than the county sheriff standing up for the oath they took.
Every Sheriff should attend the Constitutional Sheriff's Convention in January 2012.
Peace Officers Uniting to End State and Federal Tyranny
Las Vegas, NV, Jan 29-31, 2012 http://www.sheriffmack.com/
So you Think we have true elections? Try this movie.
Hacking Democracy - Full Length Video 1:21:58
When you can't control the Politicians or the voters, then you control the counting!
Go back to paper votes and we will have a President that was voted in!
When you can't control the Politicians or the voters, then you control the counting!
Go back to paper votes and we will have a President that was voted in!
Thursday, December 22, 2011
Obama Signs NDAA Martial Law
There is little one can say about a video such as this but nazi Germany has arrived in the US predicted by many for years. The writing was on the wall so people shouldn't be surprised. Credits to the editor of this video Matt D and to YouTube user clipofreality who uploaded this clip on 14th December and thanks to rohbss for bringing this video to my attention. I am very glad that more people are now awakening to the atrocities that have been going on for a very long time. The more people that see this video the better. It's all about informing and spreading truth after all.
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Candidate for Montana Attorney General, Jim Shockley, Holds Shocking View of the Constitution
Candidate for Montana Attorney General, Jim Shockley, stated while sitting in his official capacity as Montana Senator that original and true meaning of state sovereignty, as expressed in the tenth amendment of the United States Constitution, was changed and ridded by the Civil War. Shockley’s position is completely incorrect constitutionally and historically. Moreover, it is dangerous to Montana’s rights and to the liberties of Montanans. Any attorney holding this view of the constitution does not qualify to serve as Montana’s next Attorney General.
Read entire article here:
http://www.libertydefenseleague.com/2011/12/19/candidate-for-montana-attorney-general-jim-shockley-holds-shocking-view-of-the-constitution/
Read entire article here:
http://www.libertydefenseleague.com/2011/12/19/candidate-for-montana-attorney-general-jim-shockley-holds-shocking-view-of-the-constitution/
Important convention for Constitutional Sheriffs.
This could make the difference of American Freedom or slavery.
This announcement is in response to the many people that inquired about helping get our local NW Montana county Sheriff's and/or Under Sheriff's to this important Conference.
Right now we are in fundraiser mode. Immediate goal per county is $1,000. I am focused on Flathead County and anything extra raised will go to help out Lincoln and Sanders County for helping get their Sheriff's sent to the CSPOA conference. Please respond with how much you would like to contribute to the cause and I will keep a tally.
For those that would like to help in other ways like 1. getting in touch with your Sheriff(encourage them to attend by phoning, writing or emailing) 2. contacting County Commissioners( encourage them give the Sheriff their blessing by showing up at public comment or getting scheduled on the commissioners agenda) or 3. by attending the Las Vegas CSPOA conference yourself (have considered this myself) please get back to me with how you would like to help out. Thanks! ~Dane
Points of Contact for the counties of Lincoln, Sanders & Flathead:
Lincoln County - Rex Nichols 889-3980 / r-nichols@eurekadsl.net
Sanders County - Mark French 360-1284 / french_mark18@yahoo.com
Flathead County - Dane Clark 270-5525 / daneclark1976@hotmail.com
Constitutional Sheriffs & Police Officers Association Conference - January 30th Las Vegas, Nevada
Q: How much does it cost to get my sheriff there? Can I sponsor my sheriff?
A: If you specify your county and county sheriff’s name, we will ensure he/she gets an official invitation to attend the January 30th meeting. If the donations you collect from your county meet or exceed $1000, your sheriff will have a funded trip to the meeting. If your sheriff declines to attend, then the monies raised will be used to fund another county sheriff’s attendance. If your sheriff accepts the invitation or seeks out a seat at the meeting, and there is not $1000 raised in your county, then your sheriff will be put into the queue for attendance.
Q: Can individuals seeking or planning to seek the office of sheriff in their county attend, and will their expenses also be paid?
A: A limited number of registered candidates for the office of sheriff are welcome to attend, without raising $1000, but must pay their own air fare and accommodations.
Q: Are other people allowed to attend the meeting?
A: A limited number of people who donate $1000 (ensuring a sitting, duly elected county sheriff can attend), and are also pre-approved by the CSPOA Board, may also attend the meetings, but their travel to and from and their own overnight accommodations must be additionally paid for. These individuals will have access to the meetings and training materials and will be included in the group meals that are served.
Q: What does the $1,000 per county sheriff pay for, and how can you show proof of how it is spent?
A: $1,000 will cover the air fare, hotel (2 nights) and catered meals for the attendees. Any additional expenses will be out of pocket to each attendee. Additionally, a portion of the $1,000 will go to help with room rental, audio/visual equipment, Internet connectivity, printing and copying expenses, and some shared expenses of support staff. As the project progresses we will be making an accounting sheet of disbursements available to those who inquire. We are hoping to have volunteers to transport people to and from the airport, etc.
Q: Is there an alternative way to donate other than PayPal at the website?
A: Yes! Please, mail silver or gold, or checks or money orders payable to CSPOA to:
Q: What if my sheriff is unconstitutional and refuses to attend, even if we paid for his/her way?
A: Many people are raising $1,000 in their county so that they may diplomatically and in good faith request that their county sheriff attend…stressing to their sheriff that there are no obstacles to his/her attendance and that he/she is supported by the people to attend. If that sheriff declines to participate or even have a deputy in a leadership position attend instead, then the people of that county have him/her on record that he/she is not a constitutional sheriff and the people will have that as a story to tell in their county. Some groups are preparing news releases that celebrate their sheriff’s attendance, as well as a news release that criticizes their sheriff for not attending. We will post the news releases at this site as they are issued. You may ask a sheriff candidate of your choice instead.
Q: What is the agenda, what will happen at the meeting?
A: The final agenda is still being formed and will be posted at the website upon completion.
Tentatively, the day is to begin at 9 a.m. And end no sooner than 9 p.m., with lunch and dinner breaks in between. The day’s activities will tentatively include:
Q: What is a Constitutional Sheriff?
A: A constitutional sheriff is the only law enforcement officer elected in your county, who follows his/her oath of office by enforcing the Bill of Rights and defending the people’s individual rights, including interposing him/herself between unlawful federal regulatory programs and the people.
Q: If my sheriff does not attend, why should I donate to this project?
A: This project is building a support system for sheriffs in all fifty states. The County Sheriff Project will advance the awareness, understanding and implementation of nullifying unlawful regulations, legislation and tyranny from state and federal government. This project will promote that America peacefully return to its foundational principles, one county at a time, one sheriff at a time.
Q: What violations can the county sheriff prevent?
A: The county sheriff can prevent unlawful searches and seizures, unlawful freezing of individual bank accounts, unlawful foreclosures, unlawful theft of property, unlawful actions by agents of unconstitutional federal agencies such as the FDA, IRS, ATF, EPA and more.
Q: Is this project associated with the national organization, Oath Keepers?
A: The chairman of the County Sheriff and Peace Officer Association, the sponsoring organization of this January 30th meeting, Richard Mack, is also on the board of directors of the Oath Keepers organization. The County Sheriff Project does not speak for the Oath Keepers.
Q: How can I find out if my sheriff has completed a County Sheriff Survey?
A: We will be presenting the results of the County Sheriff Survey issued by CSPOA to the sheriffs in attendance at the meeting. We encourage all to take a copy of the survey and seek an audience with their own county sheriff to arrange for any and all sworn officers to review and respond as publicly as possible to the County Sheriff Survey. We will be determining how to proceed with the results of our own issued survey at the meeting.
Q: How do we know which county sheriffs are attending?
A: We are publishing the names of the CSPOA Board of Directors at the www.CountySheriffProject.org and www.CSPOA.org websites. We will be determining how to publicize the attendees and the results of the January 30th County Sheriff Project at the event, and proceed from there. You are encouraged to lobby your own county sheriff to participate and attend.
Q: There are many topics that I do not see listed at your website that the sheriffs should be considering. How are you addressing issues like illegal immigration, war on drugs, TSA, forced vaccinations and so on?
A: All violations of the people’s individual liberties and freedoms are important and must eventually be addressed. The scope of involvement at this January 30th meeting will be partly determined by the subject matter expertise of the participating sheriffs as well as time limitations. We do not anticipate this meeting being the last meeting of such individuals who seek to enforce the Bill of Rights. Every single violation cannot be covered one by one, there simply is not enough time is one day to cover so many. However, a Constitutional sheriff with our training will be capable of recognizing such abuses and find ways to protect his constituents from all tyrants.
Q: Will this meeting be webcast live while it is happening?
A: No. This will be a private meeting, ensuring that all the county sheriffs have the maximum comfort level and confidentiality to discuss these important matters. All attendees will be known and identified by the CSPOA Board of Directors.
Q: Does Sheriff Mack endorse candidates who are running for various offices around the country?
A: As a rule we do not. Our focus is to gather like-minded elected Sheriffs in one location, and give them the information they need to best understand the Constitution and their oath of office to defend the principles in that document.
Q: Is there a collection started for my county to sponsor our sheriff to attend the convention?
A: We do not have the resources to efficiently track individual county's sponsorships, at this time. If you are willing to begin a fund for your sheriff, you may want to call your sheriff, give him/her your name and phone number and tell him/her that you are taking donations to send him/her to this convention. When others contact him/her, he/she can refer them to you. That way, you would not be duplicating efforts if someone else in your county wants to create a sponsorship as well. If your sheriff tells you that he/she is not interested in attending, you must make your own decision from there to simply donate directly to the Project.
http://www.countysheriffproject.org/
This announcement is in response to the many people that inquired about helping get our local NW Montana county Sheriff's and/or Under Sheriff's to this important Conference.
Right now we are in fundraiser mode. Immediate goal per county is $1,000. I am focused on Flathead County and anything extra raised will go to help out Lincoln and Sanders County for helping get their Sheriff's sent to the CSPOA conference. Please respond with how much you would like to contribute to the cause and I will keep a tally.
For those that would like to help in other ways like 1. getting in touch with your Sheriff(encourage them to attend by phoning, writing or emailing) 2. contacting County Commissioners( encourage them give the Sheriff their blessing by showing up at public comment or getting scheduled on the commissioners agenda) or 3. by attending the Las Vegas CSPOA conference yourself (have considered this myself) please get back to me with how you would like to help out. Thanks! ~Dane
Points of Contact for the counties of Lincoln, Sanders & Flathead:
Lincoln County - Rex Nichols 889-3980 / r-nichols@eurekadsl.net
Sanders County - Mark French 360-1284 / french_mark18@yahoo.com
Flathead County - Dane Clark 270-5525 / daneclark1976@hotmail.com
Constitutional Sheriffs & Police Officers Association Conference - January 30th Las Vegas, Nevada
http://www.cspoa.org/ Frequently Asked Questions http://www.countysheriffproject.org/faqs | ![]() |
A: If you specify your county and county sheriff’s name, we will ensure he/she gets an official invitation to attend the January 30th meeting. If the donations you collect from your county meet or exceed $1000, your sheriff will have a funded trip to the meeting. If your sheriff declines to attend, then the monies raised will be used to fund another county sheriff’s attendance. If your sheriff accepts the invitation or seeks out a seat at the meeting, and there is not $1000 raised in your county, then your sheriff will be put into the queue for attendance.
Q: Can individuals seeking or planning to seek the office of sheriff in their county attend, and will their expenses also be paid?
A: A limited number of registered candidates for the office of sheriff are welcome to attend, without raising $1000, but must pay their own air fare and accommodations.
Q: Are other people allowed to attend the meeting?
A: A limited number of people who donate $1000 (ensuring a sitting, duly elected county sheriff can attend), and are also pre-approved by the CSPOA Board, may also attend the meetings, but their travel to and from and their own overnight accommodations must be additionally paid for. These individuals will have access to the meetings and training materials and will be included in the group meals that are served.
Q: What does the $1,000 per county sheriff pay for, and how can you show proof of how it is spent?
A: $1,000 will cover the air fare, hotel (2 nights) and catered meals for the attendees. Any additional expenses will be out of pocket to each attendee. Additionally, a portion of the $1,000 will go to help with room rental, audio/visual equipment, Internet connectivity, printing and copying expenses, and some shared expenses of support staff. As the project progresses we will be making an accounting sheet of disbursements available to those who inquire. We are hoping to have volunteers to transport people to and from the airport, etc.
Q: Is there an alternative way to donate other than PayPal at the website?
A: Yes! Please, mail silver or gold, or checks or money orders payable to CSPOA to:
CSPOA 112 Ridgewood Dr. FredericksburgTX 78624 | ![]() |
A: Many people are raising $1,000 in their county so that they may diplomatically and in good faith request that their county sheriff attend…stressing to their sheriff that there are no obstacles to his/her attendance and that he/she is supported by the people to attend. If that sheriff declines to participate or even have a deputy in a leadership position attend instead, then the people of that county have him/her on record that he/she is not a constitutional sheriff and the people will have that as a story to tell in their county. Some groups are preparing news releases that celebrate their sheriff’s attendance, as well as a news release that criticizes their sheriff for not attending. We will post the news releases at this site as they are issued. You may ask a sheriff candidate of your choice instead.
Q: What is the agenda, what will happen at the meeting?
A: The final agenda is still being formed and will be posted at the website upon completion.
Tentatively, the day is to begin at 9 a.m. And end no sooner than 9 p.m., with lunch and dinner breaks in between. The day’s activities will tentatively include:
- Bill of Rights Training from Michael Badnarik
- Presentation on the Second Amendment from Larry Pratt
- Presentation on the Tenth Amendment and state sovereignty
- Presentation on the threat of Agenda 21 to state sovereignty
- Presentation on Continental Congress 2009’s Articles of Freedom
- County Sheriff Success Stories on Enforcing the Bill of Rights
- Presentation on formation of a Sheriff’s Posse
Q: What is a Constitutional Sheriff?
A: A constitutional sheriff is the only law enforcement officer elected in your county, who follows his/her oath of office by enforcing the Bill of Rights and defending the people’s individual rights, including interposing him/herself between unlawful federal regulatory programs and the people.
Q: If my sheriff does not attend, why should I donate to this project?
A: This project is building a support system for sheriffs in all fifty states. The County Sheriff Project will advance the awareness, understanding and implementation of nullifying unlawful regulations, legislation and tyranny from state and federal government. This project will promote that America peacefully return to its foundational principles, one county at a time, one sheriff at a time.
Q: What violations can the county sheriff prevent?
A: The county sheriff can prevent unlawful searches and seizures, unlawful freezing of individual bank accounts, unlawful foreclosures, unlawful theft of property, unlawful actions by agents of unconstitutional federal agencies such as the FDA, IRS, ATF, EPA and more.
Q: Is this project associated with the national organization, Oath Keepers?
A: The chairman of the County Sheriff and Peace Officer Association, the sponsoring organization of this January 30th meeting, Richard Mack, is also on the board of directors of the Oath Keepers organization. The County Sheriff Project does not speak for the Oath Keepers.
Q: How can I find out if my sheriff has completed a County Sheriff Survey?
A: We will be presenting the results of the County Sheriff Survey issued by CSPOA to the sheriffs in attendance at the meeting. We encourage all to take a copy of the survey and seek an audience with their own county sheriff to arrange for any and all sworn officers to review and respond as publicly as possible to the County Sheriff Survey. We will be determining how to proceed with the results of our own issued survey at the meeting.
Q: How do we know which county sheriffs are attending?
A: We are publishing the names of the CSPOA Board of Directors at the www.CountySheriffProject.org and www.CSPOA.org websites. We will be determining how to publicize the attendees and the results of the January 30th County Sheriff Project at the event, and proceed from there. You are encouraged to lobby your own county sheriff to participate and attend.
Q: There are many topics that I do not see listed at your website that the sheriffs should be considering. How are you addressing issues like illegal immigration, war on drugs, TSA, forced vaccinations and so on?
A: All violations of the people’s individual liberties and freedoms are important and must eventually be addressed. The scope of involvement at this January 30th meeting will be partly determined by the subject matter expertise of the participating sheriffs as well as time limitations. We do not anticipate this meeting being the last meeting of such individuals who seek to enforce the Bill of Rights. Every single violation cannot be covered one by one, there simply is not enough time is one day to cover so many. However, a Constitutional sheriff with our training will be capable of recognizing such abuses and find ways to protect his constituents from all tyrants.
Q: Will this meeting be webcast live while it is happening?
A: No. This will be a private meeting, ensuring that all the county sheriffs have the maximum comfort level and confidentiality to discuss these important matters. All attendees will be known and identified by the CSPOA Board of Directors.
Q: Does Sheriff Mack endorse candidates who are running for various offices around the country?
A: As a rule we do not. Our focus is to gather like-minded elected Sheriffs in one location, and give them the information they need to best understand the Constitution and their oath of office to defend the principles in that document.
Q: Is there a collection started for my county to sponsor our sheriff to attend the convention?
A: We do not have the resources to efficiently track individual county's sponsorships, at this time. If you are willing to begin a fund for your sheriff, you may want to call your sheriff, give him/her your name and phone number and tell him/her that you are taking donations to send him/her to this convention. When others contact him/her, he/she can refer them to you. That way, you would not be duplicating efforts if someone else in your county wants to create a sponsorship as well. If your sheriff tells you that he/she is not interested in attending, you must make your own decision from there to simply donate directly to the Project.
http://www.countysheriffproject.org/
Monday, December 19, 2011
Friday, December 16, 2011
JOURNALISM GONE BAD: THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER
Attorney Tim Baldwin exposes the Southern Poverty Law Center for who they really are.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Timothy/baldwin176.htm
If you do not know of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and their more than questionable tactics, allow me to give you a glimpse of their bias and hate agenda in light of its recent article against me and others.
SPLC Tactics
The SPLC has a mission to destroy any person who attempts to (re)implement the principles of the U.S. Constitution as portrayed by America’s founding generation. They attempt to accomplish this by using rhetoric of hysteria. They use guilt-by-association logic and attempt to paint with very broad and fuzzy brushes. Reason.com agrees on this point.
SPLC never defines the terms it uses; it only uses them to ridicule, denigrate, and marginalize, hoping the public will discredit those people SPLC demeans before the public has a chance to listen to the substance of what SPLC’s targets are saying.
SPLC’s use of logical formula is as liberal and unbounded as their idea of the federal government’s power over the States and individuals. (How, then, does SPLC and the Department of Homeland Security get along so well?)
Read the entire article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Timothy/baldwin176.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/Timothy/baldwin176.htm
If you do not know of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and their more than questionable tactics, allow me to give you a glimpse of their bias and hate agenda in light of its recent article against me and others.
SPLC Tactics
The SPLC has a mission to destroy any person who attempts to (re)implement the principles of the U.S. Constitution as portrayed by America’s founding generation. They attempt to accomplish this by using rhetoric of hysteria. They use guilt-by-association logic and attempt to paint with very broad and fuzzy brushes. Reason.com agrees on this point.
SPLC never defines the terms it uses; it only uses them to ridicule, denigrate, and marginalize, hoping the public will discredit those people SPLC demeans before the public has a chance to listen to the substance of what SPLC’s targets are saying.
SPLC’s use of logical formula is as liberal and unbounded as their idea of the federal government’s power over the States and individuals. (How, then, does SPLC and the Department of Homeland Security get along so well?)
Read the entire article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Timothy/baldwin176.htm
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Game depleted by Fish and Game agencies?
Are the current fish and game agencies running a criminal enterprise to deplete the food supply in the Northwest?
Where did they get the money to introduce the new species of wolf (Alaska tundra wolf/Canadian Gray wolf) into our area?
You decide.
http://www.lobowatch.org/
http://fanning-baldwin.com/wolves-other-species/
Dec. 12 Letters to the Editor
Lewiston Morning Tribune
Elk harvests declining
I would state a few comparisons in response to Idaho Department of Fish and Game's woes as printed Nov. 13 in the Lewiston Tribune.
My wild game processing plant has a large five-rail cooler for elk and a large five-rail cooler for deer.
Hunting season 2008 started with a loaded elk cooler (40-60 elk) and 60-70 deer out back. Long hours of cutting did not empty the refilling rails for six weeks.
Hunting season 2009 yielded only 60 percent compared to 2008 and in 2010 the numbers dropped another 20 percent.
Hunting season 2011 did not fill two rails of elk and only two rails of deer. From 2008 through 2011, wild game carcass numbers have dropped more than 60 percent.
My son has guided hunters on the South Fork, Middle Fork and Main Salmon River. In the last 15 years, he has witnessed the disappearance of elk in Chamberlain Basin and very depleted elk numbers on all main forks of the Salmon River hunting areas.
Hunters coming into the plant from Elk River and the Clearwater Drainage are not finding elk and most hear wolves howling at night.
It would seem the reason license sales are down is because there is no game left to hunt. I feel that Fish and Game and government have nobody to blame but themselves.
I hope the Lewiston Tribune's Nov. 28 front-page doesn't prove to be Washington's trophy elk demise before some young hunters get to harvest one.
Terry Gregory
Moscow
Where did they get the money to introduce the new species of wolf (Alaska tundra wolf/Canadian Gray wolf) into our area?
You decide.
http://www.lobowatch.org/
http://fanning-baldwin.com/wolves-other-species/
Dec. 12 Letters to the Editor
Lewiston Morning Tribune
Elk harvests declining
I would state a few comparisons in response to Idaho Department of Fish and Game's woes as printed Nov. 13 in the Lewiston Tribune.
My wild game processing plant has a large five-rail cooler for elk and a large five-rail cooler for deer.
Hunting season 2008 started with a loaded elk cooler (40-60 elk) and 60-70 deer out back. Long hours of cutting did not empty the refilling rails for six weeks.
Hunting season 2009 yielded only 60 percent compared to 2008 and in 2010 the numbers dropped another 20 percent.
Hunting season 2011 did not fill two rails of elk and only two rails of deer. From 2008 through 2011, wild game carcass numbers have dropped more than 60 percent.
My son has guided hunters on the South Fork, Middle Fork and Main Salmon River. In the last 15 years, he has witnessed the disappearance of elk in Chamberlain Basin and very depleted elk numbers on all main forks of the Salmon River hunting areas.
Hunters coming into the plant from Elk River and the Clearwater Drainage are not finding elk and most hear wolves howling at night.
It would seem the reason license sales are down is because there is no game left to hunt. I feel that Fish and Game and government have nobody to blame but themselves.
I hope the Lewiston Tribune's Nov. 28 front-page doesn't prove to be Washington's trophy elk demise before some young hunters get to harvest one.
Terry Gregory
Moscow
The Corporation Of The United States Of America Is It True? We Are Not Under Common Law?
http://reality-bytes.hubpages.com/hub/The-Corporation-Of-The-United-States-Of-America
I hope you read this article and try to understand... (I know some of you already know the truth but it is well written)
Excerpt:
The Swindle
The Congress knew that our country was bankrupt, so they made an arrangement with the International Bankers to run up a Debt to these Foreign Banks ( the Rothschilds of London were investing in many enterprises Globally).
One thing that everyone knows about banks is that they do not lend money simply to be kind. The only way that a Bank would enter into a contract is if it would benefit the Bank. Some kind of Collateral, or some kind of scheme that would put the population into servitude to the Banks would be necessary.
The sneaky and manipulating International Bankers would not lend money to our financially troubled nation without some stipulations. They came up with a devious scheme to gain control over the country that they had desired for a long time. The Founding Fathers detested these Foreign Entities and kept them at bay until the Act of 1871 was passed.
The Act formed the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. It is the capitalization that is important. This Corporation which was owned by Foreign Entities immediately did away with the original Constitution.
The Act of 1871 changed our Constitution. The title was Capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "OF" in the title.
"The Constitution for the united states of America" was written by the Founding Fathers. The international bankers had it changed to "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA".
"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." — Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II
I hope you read this article and try to understand... (I know some of you already know the truth but it is well written)
Excerpt:
The Swindle
The Congress knew that our country was bankrupt, so they made an arrangement with the International Bankers to run up a Debt to these Foreign Banks ( the Rothschilds of London were investing in many enterprises Globally).
One thing that everyone knows about banks is that they do not lend money simply to be kind. The only way that a Bank would enter into a contract is if it would benefit the Bank. Some kind of Collateral, or some kind of scheme that would put the population into servitude to the Banks would be necessary.
The sneaky and manipulating International Bankers would not lend money to our financially troubled nation without some stipulations. They came up with a devious scheme to gain control over the country that they had desired for a long time. The Founding Fathers detested these Foreign Entities and kept them at bay until the Act of 1871 was passed.
The Act formed the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. It is the capitalization that is important. This Corporation which was owned by Foreign Entities immediately did away with the original Constitution.
The Act of 1871 changed our Constitution. The title was Capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "OF" in the title.
"The Constitution for the united states of America" was written by the Founding Fathers. The international bankers had it changed to "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA".
"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." — Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)