Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress
You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.
Monday, January 25, 2010
Sarah Palin's Most Important Act as Governor of Alaska?
Frank Turney with then Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. Sept. 5th 2008
Special Thanks to jury activist and executive director of the American Jury Institute, Iloilo Jones, for requesting a jury rights day proclamation from Governor Sarah Palin.
WHEREAS, September 5, 2008, will mark the 338th anniversary of the day when the jury, in the trial of William Penn, refused to convict him of violating England’s Conventicle Acts, despite clear evidence that he acted illegally by preaching a Quaker sermon to his congregation.
WHEREAS, by refusing to apply what they determined was an unjust law, the Penn jury not only served justice, but provided a basis for the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment rights of freedom of speech, religion, and peaceable assembly.
WHEREAS, September 5th, 2008, also commemorates the day when four of Penn’s jurors began nine weeks of incarceration for finding him not guilty. Their later release and exoneration established forever the English and American legal doctrine that it is the right and responsibility of the trial jury to decide on matters of law and fact.
WHEREAS, the Sixth and Seventh Amendments are included in the Bill of Rights to preserve the right to trial by jury, which in turn conveys upon the jury the responsibility to defend, with its verdict, all other individual rights enumerated or implied by the U.S. Constitution, including its Amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Sarah Palin, Governor of the State of Alaska, do hereby proclaim September 5, 2008, as: Jury Rights Day in Alaska, in recognition of the integral role the jury, as an institution, plays in our legal system.
Frank says:
Our founding fathers gave us trial by jury to check and balance government laws, whether they come from Congress or your own state legislator. For the past 16 years Frank has been informing and educating Alaskans, young and old, about our rights and responsibilities when sitting on a jury. Judges excuse jurors in the event a juror admits he knows his jury nullification rights. As a juror, you have the right to judge the laws and the facts. Frank is also educating people about the true use of the Grand Jury - not only indictment, but the lesser known second function: presentment.
For Frank Turney's Story go here:
http://www.votefrankturney.com/ft12.html
You can not be accused of Jury tampering if you are educating registered voters who are not jurors yet.
But does the jury's power to veto bad laws exist under our Constitution?
It certainly does! At the time the Constitution was written, the definition of the term "jury" referred to a group of citizens empowered to judge both the law and the evidence in the case before it. Then, in the February term of 1794, the Supreme Court conducted a jury trial in the case of the State of Georgia vs. Brailsford1. The instructions to the jury in the first jury trial before the Supreme Court of the United States illustrate the true power of the jury. Chief Justice John Jay said: "It is presumed, that juries are the best judges of facts; it is, on the other hand, presumed that courts are the best judges of law. But still both objects are within your power of decision." (emphasis added) "...you have a right to take it upon yourselves to judge of both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy".
So you see, in an American courtroom there are in a sense twelve judges in attendance, not just one. And they are there with the power to review the "law" as well as the "facts"! Actually, the "judge" is there to conduct the proceedings in an orderly fashion and maintain the safety of all parties involved.
As recently as 1972, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said that the jury has an " unreviewable and irreversible power... to acquit in disregard of the instructions on the law given by the trial judge. (US vs Dougherty, 473 F 2d 1113, 1139 (1972)
Or as this same truth was stated in a earlier decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Maryland: "We recognize, as appellants urge, the undisputed power of the jury to acquit, even if its verdict is contrary to the law as given by the judge, and contrary to the evidence. This is a power that must exist as long as we adhere to the general verdict in criminal cases, for the courts cannot search the minds of the jurors to find the basis upon which they judge. If the jury feels that the law under which the defendant is accused, is unjust, or that exigent circumstances justified the actions of the accused, or for any reason which appeals to their logic of passion, the jury has the power to acquit, and the courts must abide by that decision.
US vs Moylan, 417 F 2d 1002, 1006 (1969)
These quotes are from the Juror's Handbook, found here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_Jurors_Handbook.pdf
Special Thanks to jury activist and executive director of the American Jury Institute, Iloilo Jones, for requesting a jury rights day proclamation from Governor Sarah Palin.
WHEREAS, September 5, 2008, will mark the 338th anniversary of the day when the jury, in the trial of William Penn, refused to convict him of violating England’s Conventicle Acts, despite clear evidence that he acted illegally by preaching a Quaker sermon to his congregation.
WHEREAS, by refusing to apply what they determined was an unjust law, the Penn jury not only served justice, but provided a basis for the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment rights of freedom of speech, religion, and peaceable assembly.
WHEREAS, September 5th, 2008, also commemorates the day when four of Penn’s jurors began nine weeks of incarceration for finding him not guilty. Their later release and exoneration established forever the English and American legal doctrine that it is the right and responsibility of the trial jury to decide on matters of law and fact.
WHEREAS, the Sixth and Seventh Amendments are included in the Bill of Rights to preserve the right to trial by jury, which in turn conveys upon the jury the responsibility to defend, with its verdict, all other individual rights enumerated or implied by the U.S. Constitution, including its Amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Sarah Palin, Governor of the State of Alaska, do hereby proclaim September 5, 2008, as: Jury Rights Day in Alaska, in recognition of the integral role the jury, as an institution, plays in our legal system.
Frank says:
Our founding fathers gave us trial by jury to check and balance government laws, whether they come from Congress or your own state legislator. For the past 16 years Frank has been informing and educating Alaskans, young and old, about our rights and responsibilities when sitting on a jury. Judges excuse jurors in the event a juror admits he knows his jury nullification rights. As a juror, you have the right to judge the laws and the facts. Frank is also educating people about the true use of the Grand Jury - not only indictment, but the lesser known second function: presentment.
For Frank Turney's Story go here:
http://www.votefrankturney.com/ft12.html
You can not be accused of Jury tampering if you are educating registered voters who are not jurors yet.
But does the jury's power to veto bad laws exist under our Constitution?
It certainly does! At the time the Constitution was written, the definition of the term "jury" referred to a group of citizens empowered to judge both the law and the evidence in the case before it. Then, in the February term of 1794, the Supreme Court conducted a jury trial in the case of the State of Georgia vs. Brailsford1. The instructions to the jury in the first jury trial before the Supreme Court of the United States illustrate the true power of the jury. Chief Justice John Jay said: "It is presumed, that juries are the best judges of facts; it is, on the other hand, presumed that courts are the best judges of law. But still both objects are within your power of decision." (emphasis added) "...you have a right to take it upon yourselves to judge of both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy".
So you see, in an American courtroom there are in a sense twelve judges in attendance, not just one. And they are there with the power to review the "law" as well as the "facts"! Actually, the "judge" is there to conduct the proceedings in an orderly fashion and maintain the safety of all parties involved.
As recently as 1972, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said that the jury has an " unreviewable and irreversible power... to acquit in disregard of the instructions on the law given by the trial judge. (US vs Dougherty, 473 F 2d 1113, 1139 (1972)
Or as this same truth was stated in a earlier decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Maryland: "We recognize, as appellants urge, the undisputed power of the jury to acquit, even if its verdict is contrary to the law as given by the judge, and contrary to the evidence. This is a power that must exist as long as we adhere to the general verdict in criminal cases, for the courts cannot search the minds of the jurors to find the basis upon which they judge. If the jury feels that the law under which the defendant is accused, is unjust, or that exigent circumstances justified the actions of the accused, or for any reason which appeals to their logic of passion, the jury has the power to acquit, and the courts must abide by that decision.
US vs Moylan, 417 F 2d 1002, 1006 (1969)
These quotes are from the Juror's Handbook, found here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_Jurors_Handbook.pdf
Tom Woods on State Nullification of Unconstitutional "Laws"
Thomas Woods Speech - C4L Rigional Conference
Thomas Woods Jr. gives speech on "NULLIFICATION" to the Campaign for Liberty Regional Conference, Atlanta Georgia 1/15/2010.
This fits right in with Jury Nullification of bad laws, and unconstitutional laws.
See the concept of Jury nullification at http://www.fija.org/
Jury nullification is in full force and effect at law in Montana and all other states.
But the judges don't want you to know your power on the Jury. They will ask you if you will take the law as the judge gives it to you. If you answer no they will surely exclude you from serving as a juror. If you answer yes, they might ask you to take an oath to that effect, but they can not stop you from voting your conscience in the jury room. They can't stop you from nullifying bad law. They can not stop you from refusing to apply a specific statute to a specific set of facts if you decide that it is not appropriate, thereby nullifying that law.
A single nullification verdict against a particular law may or may not alter or reform the government, but thousands of such verdicts certainly do. Witness the decisive role of jury nullification in establishing freedom of speech and press in the American Colonies, defeating the Fugitive Slave Act and ending alcohol prohibition.
The concept of nullification also fits with the concept of the Grand Jury which has been subjugated to control by prosecutors and judges. Grand Juries should stand as a barrier between the over-zealous and power hungry government, over-zealous prosecutors, and We the People.
Study at http://www.americangrandjury.org/
See language on jury nullification as contained in current state law here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_state_language_on_jury_nullification.pdf
See Jury power and the system of checks and balances here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_Jurors_Handbook.pdf
As a juror you already have these powers. You don't have to lobby and get new laws passed. You don't have to have a judge's permission. You don't have to spend any money to have these powers. You don't have to beg any government agent for these rights and duties.
The only law we might want to pass is one the commands all judges to make sure the jury understands these rights to nullify bad law with specific language to be read to the jury before each case is sent to the jury. We might also want to have a statute that makes it a crime for anyone, including judges and prosecutors, to hide these facts from the jury.
This article should start a lively discussion in the comments section on the subject of using jury nullification and grand jury powers to reign in out of control agents of government, especially those who work in the judicial system. Please comment at the "comments" link below.
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Thomas Woods Jr. gives speech on "NULLIFICATION" to the Campaign for Liberty Regional Conference, Atlanta Georgia 1/15/2010.
This fits right in with Jury Nullification of bad laws, and unconstitutional laws.
See the concept of Jury nullification at http://www.fija.org/
Jury nullification is in full force and effect at law in Montana and all other states.
But the judges don't want you to know your power on the Jury. They will ask you if you will take the law as the judge gives it to you. If you answer no they will surely exclude you from serving as a juror. If you answer yes, they might ask you to take an oath to that effect, but they can not stop you from voting your conscience in the jury room. They can't stop you from nullifying bad law. They can not stop you from refusing to apply a specific statute to a specific set of facts if you decide that it is not appropriate, thereby nullifying that law.
A single nullification verdict against a particular law may or may not alter or reform the government, but thousands of such verdicts certainly do. Witness the decisive role of jury nullification in establishing freedom of speech and press in the American Colonies, defeating the Fugitive Slave Act and ending alcohol prohibition.
The concept of nullification also fits with the concept of the Grand Jury which has been subjugated to control by prosecutors and judges. Grand Juries should stand as a barrier between the over-zealous and power hungry government, over-zealous prosecutors, and We the People.
Study at http://www.americangrandjury.org/
See language on jury nullification as contained in current state law here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_state_language_on_jury_nullification.pdf
See Jury power and the system of checks and balances here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_Jurors_Handbook.pdf
As a juror you already have these powers. You don't have to lobby and get new laws passed. You don't have to have a judge's permission. You don't have to spend any money to have these powers. You don't have to beg any government agent for these rights and duties.
The only law we might want to pass is one the commands all judges to make sure the jury understands these rights to nullify bad law with specific language to be read to the jury before each case is sent to the jury. We might also want to have a statute that makes it a crime for anyone, including judges and prosecutors, to hide these facts from the jury.
This article should start a lively discussion in the comments section on the subject of using jury nullification and grand jury powers to reign in out of control agents of government, especially those who work in the judicial system. Please comment at the "comments" link below.
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
PharmaMedia-gate - white collar bio-terrorism and psychological warfare
PharmaMedia To Squelch EU Council's Secret Investigation Into H1N1 Vaccine Fraud & Worldwide Genocide
By Sherri Kane on Rense.com
1-23-10
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) will hold a secret hearing next week into the apparent manipulation by BigPharma of the World Health Organization's (WHO) global H1N1 flu campaign. Experts predict the secrecy will be maintained by the PharmaMedia that controls mainstream news.
THIS IS THE SMOKING GUN ON H1N1 SCARE!
http://www.rense.com/general89/pharm.htm
"PHARMAGANDA: A Study of Conflicting Interests."
Watch the video here about the cheerleader who contracted DYSTONIA after a shot.
Watch the movies about half way through.
See Dr. David Horowitz's http://fluscam.com/HOME.html
By Sherri Kane on Rense.com
1-23-10
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) will hold a secret hearing next week into the apparent manipulation by BigPharma of the World Health Organization's (WHO) global H1N1 flu campaign. Experts predict the secrecy will be maintained by the PharmaMedia that controls mainstream news.
THIS IS THE SMOKING GUN ON H1N1 SCARE!
http://www.rense.com/general89/pharm.htm
"PHARMAGANDA: A Study of Conflicting Interests."
Watch the video here about the cheerleader who contracted DYSTONIA after a shot.
Watch the movies about half way through.
See Dr. David Horowitz's http://fluscam.com/HOME.html
Sunday, January 24, 2010
From the Makers of CAMP FEMA. DON'T TREAD ON ME MOVIE
Be one of the first to watch "Don't Tread On Me" in the spring.
Click this link to be notified when it is ready.
http://www.donttreadonmemovie.com/index.html
Don't Tread On Me Director's Hotel Room Burglarized, Script Stolen
For Immediate Release
January 23, 2010, Oklahoma City, OK - While in Oklahoma City to film probably the most important footage of his career, independent filmmaker William Lewis' hotel room was ransacked, the thieves getting away with everything...but his camera, cell phone and the clothes on his back.
After checking into his room, Lewis, who normally does not travel alone, went out to grab a bite to eat and scout the location for his exclusive interview with Oklahoma Representative Charles Key. Upon his return, Lewis found the door to his room ajar. Pushing the door open, he found that the only thing the thieves did not get was his well-hidden camera.
Lewis said, "I barely had time to find the (interview) location and grab some pizza." It took him only seconds to notice that the burglars made off with his duffel bag, lighting equipment, backpack, which included other small equipment and information, and his laptop. Also stolen was the script and early version of the new film, Don't Tread On Me, and some extra footage.
Gary Franchi, producer and co-writer of the film, commented on the incident, "It is unknown whether or not this was a random or targeted act against the films production but, given the current political climate in America, one tends to wonder."
The policeman on the scene, Officer Bartel, was very helpful as he went door to door looking for and asking if anyone had seen anything suspicious. The hotel manager was reluctant to allow Lewis to film the rest of the incident, threatening to call the police if Lewis did not hand over the film, but was cooperative in the end, even supportive. "Good thing I keep multiple copies of this stuff and backup everything every few days!" Lewis exclaimed.
Franchi concluded, "Don't Tread On Me is still on schedule for a spring release and nothing is going to stop it."
http://www.donttreadonmemovie.com/
Click this link to be notified when it is ready.
http://www.donttreadonmemovie.com/index.html
Don't Tread On Me Director's Hotel Room Burglarized, Script Stolen
For Immediate Release
January 23, 2010, Oklahoma City, OK - While in Oklahoma City to film probably the most important footage of his career, independent filmmaker William Lewis' hotel room was ransacked, the thieves getting away with everything...but his camera, cell phone and the clothes on his back.
After checking into his room, Lewis, who normally does not travel alone, went out to grab a bite to eat and scout the location for his exclusive interview with Oklahoma Representative Charles Key. Upon his return, Lewis found the door to his room ajar. Pushing the door open, he found that the only thing the thieves did not get was his well-hidden camera.
Lewis said, "I barely had time to find the (interview) location and grab some pizza." It took him only seconds to notice that the burglars made off with his duffel bag, lighting equipment, backpack, which included other small equipment and information, and his laptop. Also stolen was the script and early version of the new film, Don't Tread On Me, and some extra footage.
Gary Franchi, producer and co-writer of the film, commented on the incident, "It is unknown whether or not this was a random or targeted act against the films production but, given the current political climate in America, one tends to wonder."
The policeman on the scene, Officer Bartel, was very helpful as he went door to door looking for and asking if anyone had seen anything suspicious. The hotel manager was reluctant to allow Lewis to film the rest of the incident, threatening to call the police if Lewis did not hand over the film, but was cooperative in the end, even supportive. "Good thing I keep multiple copies of this stuff and backup everything every few days!" Lewis exclaimed.
Franchi concluded, "Don't Tread On Me is still on schedule for a spring release and nothing is going to stop it."
http://www.donttreadonmemovie.com/
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Ron Paul's State of the Republic Address
What is it that we must do? We must immediately:
• Balance the budget by reducing spending
• Change our foreign policy to that of non-intervention
• A full audit and more supervision of the Federal Reserve leading to abolishing the Federal Reserve
• Legalize competition to the Federal Reserve with competing currencies
• Regain respect for civil liberties and privacy while reigning in the CIA
• Wean ourselves off the dependence of wealth transfers by government
• Abolish crony capitalism-no subsidies, no bailouts, no regulatory or tax privileges to protect the powerful elite, especially the military industrial complex
• Eliminate the income tax, inheritance tax and taxes on savings and dividends.
None of this can happen without the restoration of Congress to its dominant position of the three Branches of Government as was originally intended by the Constitution. The Executive and Judicial must be reined in, and Congress must assert its prerogatives over all legislation curtailing all unconstitutional agendae through budgetary controls.
Signs abound that angry Americans are now more ready than ever before for a change in direction that is indeed real. If this program were improvised-even suddenly and dramatically-the adjustment, though significant and to a degree somewhat painful, would be much shorter and of minor consequence compared to the chaos and poverty that will result if we refuse to change our gluttonous appetite for a free lunch.
Friday, January 22, 2010
From The Fight of Your Life Blog.
Russian forces have been asked to help in America
By Robert Jones
http://thefightofyourlife.blogspot.com/
I usually post all of my blog entries on tree of liberty forum. Alot of the time I get some flak from the usual trolls and debunkers. I threw a line in my last post to quit debunking everything and wake up. I only received one reply and it was quite startling. I am unsure the accuracy of the reply and the info; but I swear you better all read this and pay attention:
Well it seems NORTHCOM agrees with your view.
Below is some of what a former US military Flag officer sent me .
" I have some very recent and specific information about Russian (yes I said Russian) forces which have been tapped to "assist" U.S. forces in the near future. My wife is Russian and one of her relatives is a high placed officer who I know very well (by-the-way I speak fairly good Russian).
Several weeks ago (I am not sure of the exact date) Lt. Gen. Steven Blum the Deputy Commander of NORTHCOM requested from the Russian government pursuant to a secret agreement the use of 3 to 4 brigades of military security forces to be deployed in the U.S. presumably to assist local law enforcement in "peace keeping operations". When the request was made this very senior officer which my wife is related to expressed serious concerns about losses because of how well the "Americans" were armed. This officer and relative told me directly that he was assured by Gen. Blum that his forces would not be in the direct line of fire and that they would be free to use "whatever force was necessary to defend themselves and prevent future attacks".
When I spoke to this officer he asked how stiff the resistance would be? I let him know that it would make the fight in Afghanistan and Chechnya look like a Sunday walk in the park (the Soviet losses in Afghanistan unofficially topped 30,000 and in Chechnya the losses were even greater), I told him that the resistance would be unbelievable. He should expect a lot of snipers, men who have hunted big game for years an know how to hide and shoot, he should also not expect any quarter, anyone in uniform will be a target and that he should expect his officers to be targeted first. Roadside bombs and direct attacks on roadblocks and checkpoints will be commonplace. I let him know his troops would not be welcome and that he should oppose this request, I even offered to come to Moscow to give a briefing as to what they could expect should his government agree to provide the troops.
I am sorry I can not give any specifics, this information was given to me directly from the officer in Russia and confirmed by from a high level source at NORTHCOM. Neither could give a specific time frame but my general take was months but less than a year.
Update
This morning I received a call from Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov's office about giving a briefing/presentation in Moscow later this month on "the extent of resistance Russian security forces would face if they were to be stationed on American soil in a Peace Keeping Roll" i. I would of course be responsible for my own expenses (typical cheap ass Russians) but the defense ministry would provide ground transportation and appropriate security should I agree to come to Moscow. Needless to say I accepted and a preliminary date was set for January 28th at 0930. ".
end of quotes.
Remember that it has already been confirmed that the US and Canada have such an agreement for Canadian troops to be used in CONUS if the US requests them.
So can anyone here cite where in the US Constitution where it authorizes foreign military to exercise authority over US Citizens in the US?
While studing Consitutional Law in University I never ever discovered such a cite or even doctrine.
__________________
Information like fertilizer does no good unless you spread it.
Robert Jones
http://www.bluebattleflag.com/
By Robert Jones
http://thefightofyourlife.blogspot.com/
I usually post all of my blog entries on tree of liberty forum. Alot of the time I get some flak from the usual trolls and debunkers. I threw a line in my last post to quit debunking everything and wake up. I only received one reply and it was quite startling. I am unsure the accuracy of the reply and the info; but I swear you better all read this and pay attention:
Well it seems NORTHCOM agrees with your view.
Below is some of what a former US military Flag officer sent me .
" I have some very recent and specific information about Russian (yes I said Russian) forces which have been tapped to "assist" U.S. forces in the near future. My wife is Russian and one of her relatives is a high placed officer who I know very well (by-the-way I speak fairly good Russian).
Several weeks ago (I am not sure of the exact date) Lt. Gen. Steven Blum the Deputy Commander of NORTHCOM requested from the Russian government pursuant to a secret agreement the use of 3 to 4 brigades of military security forces to be deployed in the U.S. presumably to assist local law enforcement in "peace keeping operations". When the request was made this very senior officer which my wife is related to expressed serious concerns about losses because of how well the "Americans" were armed. This officer and relative told me directly that he was assured by Gen. Blum that his forces would not be in the direct line of fire and that they would be free to use "whatever force was necessary to defend themselves and prevent future attacks".
When I spoke to this officer he asked how stiff the resistance would be? I let him know that it would make the fight in Afghanistan and Chechnya look like a Sunday walk in the park (the Soviet losses in Afghanistan unofficially topped 30,000 and in Chechnya the losses were even greater), I told him that the resistance would be unbelievable. He should expect a lot of snipers, men who have hunted big game for years an know how to hide and shoot, he should also not expect any quarter, anyone in uniform will be a target and that he should expect his officers to be targeted first. Roadside bombs and direct attacks on roadblocks and checkpoints will be commonplace. I let him know his troops would not be welcome and that he should oppose this request, I even offered to come to Moscow to give a briefing as to what they could expect should his government agree to provide the troops.
I am sorry I can not give any specifics, this information was given to me directly from the officer in Russia and confirmed by from a high level source at NORTHCOM. Neither could give a specific time frame but my general take was months but less than a year.
Update
This morning I received a call from Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov's office about giving a briefing/presentation in Moscow later this month on "the extent of resistance Russian security forces would face if they were to be stationed on American soil in a Peace Keeping Roll" i. I would of course be responsible for my own expenses (typical cheap ass Russians) but the defense ministry would provide ground transportation and appropriate security should I agree to come to Moscow. Needless to say I accepted and a preliminary date was set for January 28th at 0930. ".
end of quotes.
Remember that it has already been confirmed that the US and Canada have such an agreement for Canadian troops to be used in CONUS if the US requests them.
So can anyone here cite where in the US Constitution where it authorizes foreign military to exercise authority over US Citizens in the US?
While studing Consitutional Law in University I never ever discovered such a cite or even doctrine.
__________________
Information like fertilizer does no good unless you spread it.
Robert Jones
http://www.bluebattleflag.com/
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Scott Brown full blown AIPAC/Neocon advocate.
Looks like AIPAC wrote his position paper on Israel validating the Mearsheimer/Walt ‘The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy’ book yet again:
http://www.solomonia.com/blog/archive/2010/01/scott-brown-speaks-to-bostons-jewish-adv/
Such support of Israel is what got US tragically attacked on 9/11 and earlier at the WTC in 1993 (simply look up ‘Israel as a terrorist’s motivation’ in the index of James Bamford’s ‘A Pretext for War’ book as well): http://TINYURL.COM/911MOTIVATION
http://TINYURL.COM/MOTIVATION911
http://www.solomonia.com/blog/archive/2010/01/scott-brown-speaks-to-bostons-jewish-adv/
Such support of Israel is what got US tragically attacked on 9/11 and earlier at the WTC in 1993 (simply look up ‘Israel as a terrorist’s motivation’ in the index of James Bamford’s ‘A Pretext for War’ book as well): http://TINYURL.COM/911MOTIVATION
http://TINYURL.COM/MOTIVATION911
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
The Dollar Bubble - Get out of Dollars NOW!
The Dollar Bubble starring Peter Schiff, Ron Paul, Marc Faber, Gerald Celente, Jim Rogers, and others. Prepare now for the U.S. dollar collapse. Pay off your house with Silver because hyper-inflation will make silver extremely valuable.
Become a member of the National Inflation Association for free at http://inflation.us/
It`s hard to stop a speeding silver bullet. Silver has been quietly rocketing ahead playing catch up with gold`s breakout to new all time highs.
The silver business is doing very well. The public is in the early stages of waking up and becoming aware that we live in interesting times. While many businesses continue to slow down, the silver business is the place to be.
Silver and gold could be quite volatile over the next month or two causing even more interest in silver and your SSB business.
Please keep a long term perspective on silver in case my main forecast outlined in SSB News comes true. And as announced last month, you get paid on EVERY coin sold. Any "half coin" in commission is rolled forward to the next month so every sale counts.
Doesn`t it make sense to be in a business where demand is CLEARLY growing? Lots of businesses are slowing down these days. Be in a business that`s "speeding up."
What`s nice about SSB is that whether silver goes up or down, if you are accumulating it on a regular basis and if you also earn bonus silver coins, then the short term price movements don`t matter.
You have the peace of mind and security of knowing you are building very real long term wealth that has stood the test of time. All paper currencies eventually disappear. Silver is money and has been for centuries, through the ups and downs and economic collapses of societies.
Join a fast growing reliable international silver business. Now is the time!
You can get back to the main page to order using the Return Visitors link at the bottom of your sponsor`s site which is http://www.silversnowball.com/220
Ed Freeman
Admin, Silver Snowball
P.S. Get all the silver you can as fast as you can. Silver owners could be the wealthiest members of society when this meltdown continues. Remember “Wealth is not destroyed it is merely transferred”. What side of the transfer do YOU want to be on?
Earn Silver Here: http://www.silversnowball.net
Buy Silver Here: http://www.teapartysilver.com
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Become a member of the National Inflation Association for free at http://inflation.us/
It`s hard to stop a speeding silver bullet. Silver has been quietly rocketing ahead playing catch up with gold`s breakout to new all time highs.
The silver business is doing very well. The public is in the early stages of waking up and becoming aware that we live in interesting times. While many businesses continue to slow down, the silver business is the place to be.
Silver and gold could be quite volatile over the next month or two causing even more interest in silver and your SSB business.
Please keep a long term perspective on silver in case my main forecast outlined in SSB News comes true. And as announced last month, you get paid on EVERY coin sold. Any "half coin" in commission is rolled forward to the next month so every sale counts.
Doesn`t it make sense to be in a business where demand is CLEARLY growing? Lots of businesses are slowing down these days. Be in a business that`s "speeding up."
What`s nice about SSB is that whether silver goes up or down, if you are accumulating it on a regular basis and if you also earn bonus silver coins, then the short term price movements don`t matter.
You have the peace of mind and security of knowing you are building very real long term wealth that has stood the test of time. All paper currencies eventually disappear. Silver is money and has been for centuries, through the ups and downs and economic collapses of societies.
Join a fast growing reliable international silver business. Now is the time!
You can get back to the main page to order using the Return Visitors link at the bottom of your sponsor`s site which is http://www.silversnowball.com/220
Ed Freeman
Admin, Silver Snowball
P.S. Get all the silver you can as fast as you can. Silver owners could be the wealthiest members of society when this meltdown continues. Remember “Wealth is not destroyed it is merely transferred”. What side of the transfer do YOU want to be on?
Earn Silver Here: http://www.silversnowball.net
Buy Silver Here: http://www.teapartysilver.com
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Things to Consider Before Supporting Any Candidate for Public Office
| General George Washington: The model of the disinterested, reluctant leader. A man who turned down and walked away from power at least three times in his life: first, by refusing the offer of a military coup at the height of his power; second, by retiring from public life after the Revolutionary War when he likely could have become “King of America,” and third, by, to the astonishment of the world, term-limiting himself and walking away from what could have been presidency for life. How does your candidate compare? |  |
When you are considering supporting any candidate for office, consider the following four criteria:
1. Do they know and understand the Constitution? If they don’t know and understand it, how can they possibly defend it? As a threshold matter, do they know the text? Have they even read it? If they don’t even know what it says, how can they follow it? If the can’t be bothered to read it, just how sincere a Constitutional defender are they? And do they understand it? Do they have a firm grasp of the basic principles and concepts of our Constitutional Republic? Attend a town hall meeting and ask them some pointed questions to test their knowledge. A good list of questions to ask can be found at the back of the excellent book, the Five Thousand Year Leap, by W. Cleon Skousen. If they don’t know the text or the answers to those questions, then you should be very hesitant to support them for office. Certainly you can have good, sincere people of demonstrated courage who have recently woken up and had not heretofore studied the Constitution. But courage without understanding will just not cut it. At the least they should correct their ignorance, and you can help them do so, such as by giving them a copy of Skousen’s book to go along with their reading of the text of the Constitution itself, but frankly I have to wonder why they are even running for office if they have not yet bothered to read and study the Constitution.
2. Even if they know what the Constitution says and understand it, do they have the integrity and courage to follow the Constitution, come what may? Knowledge without courage and integrity is even more useless than is courage without understanding. There’s a thundering herd of politicians, most of them lawyers, who do know what it says but simply don’t give a damn. When trying to figure out whether a candidate has the courage and integrity to actually be faithful to the Constitution, look not to what they say now, on the campaign trail, but to what they have done. If they have already served in office, what was their voting record? If they have already voted for unconstitutional bills, then they have shown you all you need to know. Such a person is a demonstrated oath breaker. If, to be fair to them, there is a valid question of whether one of their votes was a violation of their oath, ask them to explain why they voted the way they did. Unless they can articulate a credible rationale for why the bill was constitutional, you should pass. And have they spoken out against the violations of the Constitution by their own party, or do they only point out the violations by “the other team”? And even if they have no political voting record to look at, have they, in the past, ever stood tall in any situation, with the courage of their convictions, even at personal risk? In other words, what have they DONE? When have they taken a stand? If you can’t find any examples of them taking a stand, I would be very suspicious of believing the campaign promises.
3. Do they have the personal integrity to keep specific campaign promises, such as promises to term limit themselves or to vote for or against particular bills? What about them or their past behavior makes you confident they will keep their promises? When have they been true to their word even to their own harm?
4. What is their motivation for running? Do they look forward to public office? Are they excited about the prospect? If so, run! Frankly, the best candidate is the sincere constitutionalist who does not want to run for office, who loathes the thought of all the headaches that go with the job, that you have to convince to run against their better judgment (because serving in public office is a royal pain in the rear to normal people. Only psycho sociopaths enjoy it). You want someone who is not interested in power and perks. All too often I have seen people who were sincere constitutionalists but who also were very keen on public office sell their souls and compromise their principles because they were star-struck with the prospects of fame and fortune and liked the idea of being called “Senator” or “Representative” so-and-so just a bit too much. Seek out the person who doesn’t care a whit about all the perks and power, who detests the idea of running for office, and convince that one to run. You will more likely have someone who will stand tall no matter what.
A candidate for office must know the Constitution, must have the courage to follow it, must have the integrity to keep promises, and must be in it not for personal gain, but to serve, protect, and defend. Look past the campaign rhetoric and see if you can find a track record of knowledge, courage, and actual devotion to country. If you can’t find such a clear track record, look elsewhere.
Stewart Rhodes
Founder of Oath Keepers
Monday, January 18, 2010
QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT
VERY QUIETLY OBAMA'S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT AP- WASHINGTON D.C. -
In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency,the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has Released copies of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental College . Released today, the transcript school indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, forthe scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.
This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as President article titled, "Obama Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U.K. In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups,
Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey . This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio's case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship or qualification to serve as president.
Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending. This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter.
LET OTHER FOLKS KNOW THIS NEWS, THE MEDIA WON'T !
Subject: RE: Issue of Passport?
While I've little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?
So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket,suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?
And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?
The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.
Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A: Yes, by his own admission.
Q: What passport did he travel under?
A: There are only three possibilities.
1) He traveled with a U.S. . Passport,
2) He traveled with a British passport, or
3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No.. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.
Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.
If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.
Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "naturalborn" American citizen between 1981 and 2008..
Given the destructive nature of his plans for America , as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress,the
sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better..
If you Don't care that Your President is not a natural born Citizen and in Violation of the Constitution, then Delete this and go into your cocoon..
In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's qualifications for the presidency,the group "Americans for Freedom of Information" has Released copies of President Obama's college transcripts from Occidental College . Released today, the transcript school indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, forthe scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.
This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as President article titled, "Obama Eligibility Questioned," leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama's first official visit to the U.K. In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups,
Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey . This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio's case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship or qualification to serve as president.
Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending. This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter.
LET OTHER FOLKS KNOW THIS NEWS, THE MEDIA WON'T !
Subject: RE: Issue of Passport?
While I've little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question: What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?
So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket,suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?
And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?
The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.
Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A: Yes, by his own admission.
Q: What passport did he travel under?
A: There are only three possibilities.
1) He traveled with a U.S. . Passport,
2) He traveled with a British passport, or
3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No.. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.
Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport.
If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.
Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "naturalborn" American citizen between 1981 and 2008..
Given the destructive nature of his plans for America , as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress,the
sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better..
If you Don't care that Your President is not a natural born Citizen and in Violation of the Constitution, then Delete this and go into your cocoon..
WHEN LAW BECOMES THE PROBLEM, NOT THE SOLUTION
By Attorney Jonathan Emord
January 18, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
As a general rule, where law advances, freedom retreats. A nation possessed of a never ending complex of laws proscribing conduct cannot be a free state or, if new to the journey, a free state for long. We are becoming a nation noteworthy for its abundance of regulation, a massive labyrinth of law so constricting that it suffocates nascent businesses before they can compete in the market and forces out of the market all but those who can afford the lawyers, accountants, and risk managers necessary to stay ahead of the inventive agency heads or members of Congress.
If grave stones dotted the landscape for every business that has succumbed due to over-regulation, we would see the following content engraved on hundreds of thousands of them: Here lies Business X that died from regulatory strangulation at a very young age.
When federal regulations prohibit or channel nearly every commercial activity, it requires an extensive legal education just to understand what can and cannot be done. Such regulation depends on prior restraint and vastly exceeds common knowledge. When seemingly innocuous behavior is criminalized, the innocent become criminals. Federal and state regulations now achieve that end.
Read the Article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Emord/jonathan114.htm
Read the solution here:
http://www.fija.org/
January 18, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
As a general rule, where law advances, freedom retreats. A nation possessed of a never ending complex of laws proscribing conduct cannot be a free state or, if new to the journey, a free state for long. We are becoming a nation noteworthy for its abundance of regulation, a massive labyrinth of law so constricting that it suffocates nascent businesses before they can compete in the market and forces out of the market all but those who can afford the lawyers, accountants, and risk managers necessary to stay ahead of the inventive agency heads or members of Congress.
If grave stones dotted the landscape for every business that has succumbed due to over-regulation, we would see the following content engraved on hundreds of thousands of them: Here lies Business X that died from regulatory strangulation at a very young age.
When federal regulations prohibit or channel nearly every commercial activity, it requires an extensive legal education just to understand what can and cannot be done. Such regulation depends on prior restraint and vastly exceeds common knowledge. When seemingly innocuous behavior is criminalized, the innocent become criminals. Federal and state regulations now achieve that end.
Read the Article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Emord/jonathan114.htm
Read the solution here:
http://www.fija.org/
WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US?
By Michael LeMieux
January 18, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
Obama’s Council of Governors
On January 11th, 2010 with virtually no fanfare or public announcement President Obama created by executive order what will amount to a hand picked governor panel for issues of homeland defense.
This executive order¹ creates a hand picked panel of 10 governors for the stated purpose of exchanging “views, information, or advice” on:
(a) Matters involving the National Guard of the various States;
(b) Homeland defense;
(c) Civil support;
(d) Synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and
(e) Other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities.
Again, if so much attention, manpower, organization, and agreements are focused within these borders for admittedly “defensive” reasons; who are the enemy they are focusing on? As Walt Kelly’s comic character Pogo announced: “We have met the enemy and he is us.”
Or so it appears!
Read the Article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/LeMieux/michael107.htm
January 18, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
Obama’s Council of Governors
On January 11th, 2010 with virtually no fanfare or public announcement President Obama created by executive order what will amount to a hand picked governor panel for issues of homeland defense.
This executive order¹ creates a hand picked panel of 10 governors for the stated purpose of exchanging “views, information, or advice” on:
(a) Matters involving the National Guard of the various States;
(b) Homeland defense;
(c) Civil support;
(d) Synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and
(e) Other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities.
Again, if so much attention, manpower, organization, and agreements are focused within these borders for admittedly “defensive” reasons; who are the enemy they are focusing on? As Walt Kelly’s comic character Pogo announced: “We have met the enemy and he is us.”
Or so it appears!
Read the Article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/LeMieux/michael107.htm
Sunday, January 17, 2010
The Capitalist Conspiracy - G Edward Griffin
The Capitalist Conspiracy: An Inside view of International Banking Written and narrated by G. Edward Griffin (1960's) An old film, made sometime in the 60's. This is an adaptation of a documentary filmstrip tracing the history of a small group of people who control the money systems of the world. It shows how this group is protected by governments and how its wealth is derived by creating money out of nothing. We see how this group wields power through government, foundations, education, and the mass media. It has aided such regimes as Russia and China, not because it is pro-Communist, but because a visible enemy and the threat of war have been useful in persuading the masses to embrace the group's ultimate goal: a world government which they expect to control from behind the scenes. They are now working to replace fear of nuclear war with fear of global pollution as the motivation for world government. It is clear that the plan revealed in this program continues to unfold. Monopoly is not an outgrowth of capitalism. Monopolists lobby for laws that give them advantages in the market place. Monopoloy is not based on free-enterprise competition, but the escape from it. It is not the product of capitalism but the bedfellow of socialism.
Sunday Prayers for Patriots
| Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's The Church's Year 1875 2nd Sunday after Epiphany |  |
Those have to expect a severe sentence from God, who merely for temporal gain, seek profitable offices, and thrust themselves therein whether capable or not, and if capable care very little whether they fulfill the duties required, or perhaps make the fulfillment of them depend upon bribes. Of such God makes terrible complaint: Thy princes (judges) are faithless, companions of thieves: they all love bribes, they run after rewards. They judge not for the fatherless; and the widow's cause comes not into them (Is. 1:23). A most severe judgment shall be for them that bear rule (Wisd. 6:6).
See the whole article here:
http://www.calefactory.org/books/goffine/epiphany02.htm
GOSPEL (Jn. 2:1-11). At that time there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee: and the mother of Jesus was there. And Jesus also was invited, and his disciples, to the marriage. And the wine failing, the mother of Jesus saith to him: They have no wine. And Jesus with to her: Woman, what is it to me and to thee? my hour is not yet come. His mother saith to the waiters: Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye. Now there were set there six water-pots of stone, according to the manner of the purifying of the Jews, containing two or three measures apiece. Jesus saith to them: Fill the water-pots with water. And they filled them up to the brim. And Jesus saith to them: Draw out now, and carry to the chief steward of the feast. And they carried it. And when the chief steward had tasted the water made wine, and knew not whence it was, but the waiters knew who had drawn the water; the chief steward calleth the bridegroom, and saith to him: Every man at first setteth forth good wine; and when men have well drank, then that which is worse: but thou hast kept the good wine until now. This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee: and manifested his glory, and his disciples believed in him.
Why are there so many unhappy marriages?
Because so many people prepare the way by sins and vices, and continue to sin without interruption, and without true amendment until marriage, therefore always make sacrilegious confessions, even perhaps immediately before marriage. Besides this many enter the married life on account of carnal intentions, or other earthly motives; in many cases they do not even ask God for His grace; without any proper preparation for such an important, sacred act, on their marriage day they go to church with levity and afterwards celebrate their wedding with but little modesty. Is it any wonder that such married people receive no blessing, no grace, when they render themselves so unworthy?
See the same page for the Church's instruction on the Holy Sacrament of Matrimony.
http://www.calefactory.org/books/goffine/epiphany02.htm
Saturday, January 16, 2010
US Census Bureau and GPS Targeting
Is the US military entering your GPS co-ordinates into their targeting computers? Why? Will they just shoot a Hellfire missle through your door when they want you?
History of the Star Spangled Banner - Francis Scott Key
What do the words of the National Anthem mean?
On Sept. 14, 1814, Francis Scott Key peered through clearing smoke to see an enormous flag flying proudly after a 25-hour British bombardment of Baltimore's Fort McHenry. Key was inspired to write a poem, which was later set to music. Even before "The Star-Spangled Banner" became our national anthem, it helped transform the garrison flag with the same name into a major national symbol of patriotism and identity. The flag has had a colorful history, from its origins in a government contract through its sojourn with several generations of a Baltimore family to its eventual donation to the Smithsonian Institution.
On Sept. 14, 1814, Francis Scott Key peered through clearing smoke to see an enormous flag flying proudly after a 25-hour British bombardment of Baltimore's Fort McHenry. Key was inspired to write a poem, which was later set to music. Even before "The Star-Spangled Banner" became our national anthem, it helped transform the garrison flag with the same name into a major national symbol of patriotism and identity. The flag has had a colorful history, from its origins in a government contract through its sojourn with several generations of a Baltimore family to its eventual donation to the Smithsonian Institution.
Friday, January 15, 2010
Is there any Justice in Lincoln and Ravalli county courts in Montana?
Do you expect to find any justice in the court system in these counties?
You might want to read the following pages and make up your own mind.
This is a first hand account by the person who seems to be getting the brunt of serious persecution and threats against her life, without any help from the so called "justice system" in those counties.
These are not idle ramblings. I have seen the proof she is talking about. I have been notified several times after each of these incidents had happened, mostly because my name was also mentioned in some of these threats. Just read the pages and make up your own mind.
More at the following links:
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/caution-cussing-and-well-foul-language.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/judge-robin-clute-gave-sean-boushie.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/can-you-get-protective-order-to-stop.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/in-my-opinion-judge-robin-clute-has.html
Paul Stramer is NOT the author of the above articles!
I know of several JP court justices that seem to think an order of protection is the remedy for absolutely everything. They slam the gavel and issue an order that makes the responder look guilty of all kinds of crimes on just the sayso of the complainant without ever requiring the person complaining to provide any evidence, photos, afidavits, witnesses, or any proof whatsoever, and all this without benefit of any jury of their peers. These JP judges deny the respondent the ability to call any witnesses for the defense, or have any character witnesses in the courtroom. They "convict" the respondent on the spot of whatever they have been accused of by their own judgement alone. Then the sheriff will use that unsubstantiated order like they would use a conviction, to build a case for other and maybe unrelated charges, all trumped up to smear and defame their own political opponents, and destroy the lives of the accused, and now "convicted" by only a Judge's sayso.
This happens daily in Montana and all over the nation. There is no protection for the accused in this scenario whatsoever. What happened to "Innocent until proven guilty beyond a doubt"? The JP courts are not a court of record, so it's easy for the JP judges to simply deny any wrongdoing. And trying to get that order reviewed by a state district court is very expensive and time consuming, so much so that the respondent won't be able to do it. The JP judges know that. They count on it. They abuse their power and use it as a weapon to destroy their political opposition.
This is exactly the kind of abuse of power that the Grand Jury is designed to protect We the People from.
For a great and timely history of the power and use of the Grand Jury read this background:
http://americangrandjury.org/history_power.html
As I have said many times before, I will exhaust every lawful means of getting government back under the control of We the People. There is much corruption in government, especially in the Judiciary.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/09/when-is-it-time-to-fight.html
We the People can and must use every lawful means to eliminate this corruption if our children are to live in a free county and country, rather than a marxist democracy mob rule of men, making the rules as they go. Democracies never have worked for freedom anywhere throughout history. A Democracy will always lead to an Oligarchy (rule of the few) and loss of freedom. In short a Democracy is MOB RULE, and that is what we seem to have in American today especially in the judiciary. Over 2/3 of the people don't want health care. That is an undisputed fact even by the major media. In fact they don't talk about it. Where is the mechanism to bring the people who are shoving it down the American peoples throats to justice? Where is the remedy in justice for the little guy? It's in the Grand Jury and the petit (trial) jury.
"In addition to its traditional role of screening criminal cases for prosecution, common law grand juries had the power to exclude prosecutors from their presence at any time and to investigate public officials without governmental influence. These fundamental powers allowed grand juries to serve a vital function of oversight upon the government. The function of a grand jury to ferret out government corruption was the primary purpose of the grand jury system in ages past." Roger Roots, J.D.
If it's not a runaway, it's not a Real Grand Jury:
http://www.constitution.org/lrev/roots/runaway.htm
You have the right as a trial juror to judge of the law as well as the facts in any case you are on.
You already have that right. You don't have to lobby for it. You don't have to get any new laws passed.
You don't have to change the Constitution. You just have to understand and exercise your rights. You have to take command in the jury room, and educate your fellow jurors. You have to enforce the Constitution and nullify bad laws in the jury room. You have to uphold the God given "unalienable" natural laws expressed and protected by the Constitution in the jury room. It's your power, unless you give it away to the judge when he tells you that you don't have it. That is right. The judges abuse their power by saying you must take the law "the way I give it to you" in effect saying you are too stupid to understand it. This arrogance needs to be stopped and soon. In fact the most famous Judge to make this mistake was a signer of the Declaration of Independence, Samuel Chase. In the US v. Callender case attempted to rule that a jury could not decide the Constututionality of a law. It may have been partially by the following statement that he averted impeachment.
SAMUEL CHASE (Justice, U. S. Supreme Court and signer of the Declaration of Independence; in 1804): "The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts."
See your jury rights here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_state_language_on_jury_nullification.pdf
Read the Jury rights handbook here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_Jurors_Handbook.pdf
Some people would like you to believe that the ordinary citizen is incapable of understanding these issues. Some would like you to believe you are too dumb to read these laws and make sense of them. They want your mind in a box of their own creation. You need to think outside their box, like the founders did.
You need to understand and exercise your rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. If you don't you will lose those God given and Constitutionally protected rights forever, for yourself and your posterity.
I choose to fight with the law first. We shall see later how unlawful and corrupt these "rule of men" people really are. I say again. those who oppose this lawful idea of reviving the standing Grand Jury should be the first to be investigated. Without accusing them of anything, I would bet that many get a paycheck from some branch of government.
It seems that leftists don't want you to know these history lessons. It seems they don't want you to exercise your true power to stop corruption. So now it's up to you. You no longer can say "But what can we do about it?"
Paul Stramer
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
You might want to read the following pages and make up your own mind.
This is a first hand account by the person who seems to be getting the brunt of serious persecution and threats against her life, without any help from the so called "justice system" in those counties.
These are not idle ramblings. I have seen the proof she is talking about. I have been notified several times after each of these incidents had happened, mostly because my name was also mentioned in some of these threats. Just read the pages and make up your own mind.
More at the following links:
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/caution-cussing-and-well-foul-language.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/judge-robin-clute-gave-sean-boushie.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/can-you-get-protective-order-to-stop.html
http://www.hamiltonmontananews.net/2009/09/in-my-opinion-judge-robin-clute-has.html
Paul Stramer is NOT the author of the above articles!
I know of several JP court justices that seem to think an order of protection is the remedy for absolutely everything. They slam the gavel and issue an order that makes the responder look guilty of all kinds of crimes on just the sayso of the complainant without ever requiring the person complaining to provide any evidence, photos, afidavits, witnesses, or any proof whatsoever, and all this without benefit of any jury of their peers. These JP judges deny the respondent the ability to call any witnesses for the defense, or have any character witnesses in the courtroom. They "convict" the respondent on the spot of whatever they have been accused of by their own judgement alone. Then the sheriff will use that unsubstantiated order like they would use a conviction, to build a case for other and maybe unrelated charges, all trumped up to smear and defame their own political opponents, and destroy the lives of the accused, and now "convicted" by only a Judge's sayso.
This happens daily in Montana and all over the nation. There is no protection for the accused in this scenario whatsoever. What happened to "Innocent until proven guilty beyond a doubt"? The JP courts are not a court of record, so it's easy for the JP judges to simply deny any wrongdoing. And trying to get that order reviewed by a state district court is very expensive and time consuming, so much so that the respondent won't be able to do it. The JP judges know that. They count on it. They abuse their power and use it as a weapon to destroy their political opposition.
This is exactly the kind of abuse of power that the Grand Jury is designed to protect We the People from.
For a great and timely history of the power and use of the Grand Jury read this background:
http://americangrandjury.org/history_power.html
As I have said many times before, I will exhaust every lawful means of getting government back under the control of We the People. There is much corruption in government, especially in the Judiciary.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/09/when-is-it-time-to-fight.html
We the People can and must use every lawful means to eliminate this corruption if our children are to live in a free county and country, rather than a marxist democracy mob rule of men, making the rules as they go. Democracies never have worked for freedom anywhere throughout history. A Democracy will always lead to an Oligarchy (rule of the few) and loss of freedom. In short a Democracy is MOB RULE, and that is what we seem to have in American today especially in the judiciary. Over 2/3 of the people don't want health care. That is an undisputed fact even by the major media. In fact they don't talk about it. Where is the mechanism to bring the people who are shoving it down the American peoples throats to justice? Where is the remedy in justice for the little guy? It's in the Grand Jury and the petit (trial) jury.
"In addition to its traditional role of screening criminal cases for prosecution, common law grand juries had the power to exclude prosecutors from their presence at any time and to investigate public officials without governmental influence. These fundamental powers allowed grand juries to serve a vital function of oversight upon the government. The function of a grand jury to ferret out government corruption was the primary purpose of the grand jury system in ages past." Roger Roots, J.D.
If it's not a runaway, it's not a Real Grand Jury:
http://www.constitution.org/lrev/roots/runaway.htm
You have the right as a trial juror to judge of the law as well as the facts in any case you are on.
You already have that right. You don't have to lobby for it. You don't have to get any new laws passed.
You don't have to change the Constitution. You just have to understand and exercise your rights. You have to take command in the jury room, and educate your fellow jurors. You have to enforce the Constitution and nullify bad laws in the jury room. You have to uphold the God given "unalienable" natural laws expressed and protected by the Constitution in the jury room. It's your power, unless you give it away to the judge when he tells you that you don't have it. That is right. The judges abuse their power by saying you must take the law "the way I give it to you" in effect saying you are too stupid to understand it. This arrogance needs to be stopped and soon. In fact the most famous Judge to make this mistake was a signer of the Declaration of Independence, Samuel Chase. In the US v. Callender case attempted to rule that a jury could not decide the Constututionality of a law. It may have been partially by the following statement that he averted impeachment.
SAMUEL CHASE (Justice, U. S. Supreme Court and signer of the Declaration of Independence; in 1804): "The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts."
See your jury rights here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_state_language_on_jury_nullification.pdf
Read the Jury rights handbook here:
http://www.fija.org/docs/JG_Jurors_Handbook.pdf
Some people would like you to believe that the ordinary citizen is incapable of understanding these issues. Some would like you to believe you are too dumb to read these laws and make sense of them. They want your mind in a box of their own creation. You need to think outside their box, like the founders did.
You need to understand and exercise your rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. If you don't you will lose those God given and Constitutionally protected rights forever, for yourself and your posterity.
I choose to fight with the law first. We shall see later how unlawful and corrupt these "rule of men" people really are. I say again. those who oppose this lawful idea of reviving the standing Grand Jury should be the first to be investigated. Without accusing them of anything, I would bet that many get a paycheck from some branch of government.
It seems that leftists don't want you to know these history lessons. It seems they don't want you to exercise your true power to stop corruption. So now it's up to you. You no longer can say "But what can we do about it?"
Paul Stramer
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Continental Congress 2009 Articles of Freedom
The Articles of Freedom from the 2009 Continental Congress are now available here:
http://www.cc2009.us/images/pdf/Articles-of-Freedom.12.24.2009.pdf
Why is this step needed:
BECAUSE:
1. The Constitution cannot defend itself and it is not a menu.
2. CC 2009 is a National Assembly of citizens from the states of the Union and the District of Columbia.
3. The purpose of CC 2009 is to legally end certain violations of the federal Constitution.
4. CC 2009 is the appropriate next step in a 14-year process by the free People to hold their STATE AND FEDERAL elected officials accountable to the federal Constitution.
5. The free People have exhausted their administrative and judicial remedies.
6. The free People wish now to exhaust their constitutional remedies, as guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence and the Accountability Clause of the First Amendment.
7. The Delegates wish to focus on Facts, avoiding Opinions.
8. The Delegates wish to focus on violations of the Constitution, avoiding political questions.
9. When the People are up against unjust and uncivil government and laws and they are entitled to reform they will achieve it if they are pro-active, non-violent and have a mass-movement.
10. These grass-roots proceedings are NOT a Constitutional Convention, which the Delegates are wholeheartedly against as such a Convention would only serve to limit our unalienable rights. The terms are easily confused, especially because it's been 225 years since "We The People" have had to convene a Continental Congress.
See the main website for Continental Congress 2009 here:
http://www.cc2009.us/
http://www.cc2009.us/images/pdf/Articles-of-Freedom.12.24.2009.pdf
Why is this step needed:
BECAUSE:
1. The Constitution cannot defend itself and it is not a menu.
2. CC 2009 is a National Assembly of citizens from the states of the Union and the District of Columbia.
3. The purpose of CC 2009 is to legally end certain violations of the federal Constitution.
4. CC 2009 is the appropriate next step in a 14-year process by the free People to hold their STATE AND FEDERAL elected officials accountable to the federal Constitution.
5. The free People have exhausted their administrative and judicial remedies.
6. The free People wish now to exhaust their constitutional remedies, as guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence and the Accountability Clause of the First Amendment.
7. The Delegates wish to focus on Facts, avoiding Opinions.
8. The Delegates wish to focus on violations of the Constitution, avoiding political questions.
9. When the People are up against unjust and uncivil government and laws and they are entitled to reform they will achieve it if they are pro-active, non-violent and have a mass-movement.
10. These grass-roots proceedings are NOT a Constitutional Convention, which the Delegates are wholeheartedly against as such a Convention would only serve to limit our unalienable rights. The terms are easily confused, especially because it's been 225 years since "We The People" have had to convene a Continental Congress.
See the main website for Continental Congress 2009 here:
http://www.cc2009.us/
How to Advance Liberty (by Leonard Read) A LEADERSHIP PROBLEM!
FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION 1978
It seems this was made more for today than back then.
This video was made to chart a course to Advance Liberty through education and leadership, which is what is sorely needed right now to counteract the radical socialism that is destroying Freedom in America.
The priniciples contained in this video outline what Lincoln County Watch is all about. The program is working. People are waking up rapidly. Knowledge is power, and the power needs to be back in the hands of educated people to stop the demise of our Freedom. People who once understand freedom and work spreading that knowledge to their neighbors are the real human rights activists.
This organization is still going strong. Here is their website:
http://fee.org/
It seems this was made more for today than back then.
This video was made to chart a course to Advance Liberty through education and leadership, which is what is sorely needed right now to counteract the radical socialism that is destroying Freedom in America.
The priniciples contained in this video outline what Lincoln County Watch is all about. The program is working. People are waking up rapidly. Knowledge is power, and the power needs to be back in the hands of educated people to stop the demise of our Freedom. People who once understand freedom and work spreading that knowledge to their neighbors are the real human rights activists.
This organization is still going strong. Here is their website:
http://fee.org/
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Jesse Ventura Talks New Show "Conspiracy Theories" and 9/11 TRUTH
THANK YOU, GOVERNOR JESSE VENTURA
Watch all Episodes of Conspiracy Theories on line here:
http://www.conspiracytheoryjesseventura.com/
THANK YOU, GOVERNOR
By Chuck Baldwin
January 15, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
Former Navy SEAL, professional wrestler, and Minnesota governor, Jesse Ventura, recently launched a new television show on the truTV (formerly known as Court TV) cable channel. The first episode debuted on Wednesday, December 2, 2009. And the final episode of this season aired this past Wednesday, January 13, 2010.
Here is the official web site for truTV's Conspiracy Theory:
http://www.trutv.com/shows/conspiracy_theory/index.html
According to press reports, 1.6 million viewers watched the premiere episode on December 2, which set a record for the network. I was one of those viewers. And I've seen each of this first season's 7 episodes.
Predictably, mainstream critics have universally condemned the series. Linda Stasi of The Washington Times said the show is "Mindless, good fun and a hoot to watch aging action stars still taking action." Robert Lloyd of the Los Angeles Times said, "Whatever truth is out there, it's filtered here through what is arranged more as an adventure series than a documentary."
First of all, let me state up front that I typically disdain "reality" shows. The only ones that are any good are Les Stroud's Survivorman and Bear Grylls' Man vs. Wild (and I really enjoy both of those programs). The rest of the so-called "reality" shows are junk, as far as I'm concerned (okay, I did enjoy watching a few episodes of Ice Road Truckers).
Contrary to the rants of modern critics, however, Ventura's Conspiracy Theory is not "reality" television or "mindless, good fun." It is better investigative reporting than anything I've seen on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN or FOX NEWS in a long, long time.
Read the whole article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin561.htm
Watch all Episodes of Conspiracy Theories on line here:
http://www.conspiracytheoryjesseventura.com/
THANK YOU, GOVERNOR
By Chuck Baldwin
January 15, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
Former Navy SEAL, professional wrestler, and Minnesota governor, Jesse Ventura, recently launched a new television show on the truTV (formerly known as Court TV) cable channel. The first episode debuted on Wednesday, December 2, 2009. And the final episode of this season aired this past Wednesday, January 13, 2010.
Here is the official web site for truTV's Conspiracy Theory:
http://www.trutv.com/shows/conspiracy_theory/index.html
According to press reports, 1.6 million viewers watched the premiere episode on December 2, which set a record for the network. I was one of those viewers. And I've seen each of this first season's 7 episodes.
Predictably, mainstream critics have universally condemned the series. Linda Stasi of The Washington Times said the show is "Mindless, good fun and a hoot to watch aging action stars still taking action." Robert Lloyd of the Los Angeles Times said, "Whatever truth is out there, it's filtered here through what is arranged more as an adventure series than a documentary."
First of all, let me state up front that I typically disdain "reality" shows. The only ones that are any good are Les Stroud's Survivorman and Bear Grylls' Man vs. Wild (and I really enjoy both of those programs). The rest of the so-called "reality" shows are junk, as far as I'm concerned (okay, I did enjoy watching a few episodes of Ice Road Truckers).
Contrary to the rants of modern critics, however, Ventura's Conspiracy Theory is not "reality" television or "mindless, good fun." It is better investigative reporting than anything I've seen on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN or FOX NEWS in a long, long time.
Read the whole article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin561.htm
Obama's Secret Vault - Chuck Norris weighs in on the Interpol debacle
On Glenn Beck's Jan. 7 show, he was rightly puzzled regarding the exact purpose of President Barack Obama's Dec. 16 signing of an executive order "DESIGNATING INTERPOL AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES."Glenn, I agree. But I think I recently have seen behind the veil on the White House's covert mission and mystery with Interpol.
Beck spoke for a host of other government watchdogs when he said on the air: "We've been asking ever since it was signed: Why? Who can tell me what special interest group asked for this? If it were about terror, why not tell us that when he signed it? This Congress attacks our CIA and FBI, but Interpol gets immunity? Why? It makes no sense."
Read the whole article here:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=35166
Beck spoke for a host of other government watchdogs when he said on the air: "We've been asking ever since it was signed: Why? Who can tell me what special interest group asked for this? If it were about terror, why not tell us that when he signed it? This Congress attacks our CIA and FBI, but Interpol gets immunity? Why? It makes no sense."
Read the whole article here:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=35166
Quotes of the day to think about.
"A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves."
--Edward R. Murrow
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined."
--Patrick Henry
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground."
--Thomas Jefferson
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
--Thomas Jefferson (1802)
--Edward R. Murrow
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined."
--Patrick Henry
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground."
--Thomas Jefferson
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
--Thomas Jefferson (1802)
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
The Fed is about Done. Ron Paul champion of sound money
The politicians DON'T UNDERSTAND MONEY, except for Ron Paul.
This video has received over 73,000 views since I uploaded it to YouTube last year.
Mike Maloney is Robert Kiyosaki's precious metals advisor. He has been right on.
Ron Paul being interviewed by Robert Kiyosaki's adviser Mike Maloney. See why silver and gold are the best investment you can have right now.
Silver is set to make enormous gains like it always has in times of economic crisis, and collapsing fiat currencies.
Call Paul Stramer for immediate quotes on various silver rounds. We can lock in your price while you are on the phone with us. 800 889 2839
You can earn silver here:
http://www.silversnowball.net/
or buy silver here:
http://www.teapartysilver.com/
This video has received over 73,000 views since I uploaded it to YouTube last year.
Mike Maloney is Robert Kiyosaki's precious metals advisor. He has been right on.
Ron Paul being interviewed by Robert Kiyosaki's adviser Mike Maloney. See why silver and gold are the best investment you can have right now.
Silver is set to make enormous gains like it always has in times of economic crisis, and collapsing fiat currencies.
Call Paul Stramer for immediate quotes on various silver rounds. We can lock in your price while you are on the phone with us. 800 889 2839
You can earn silver here:
http://www.silversnowball.net/
or buy silver here:
http://www.teapartysilver.com/
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
The Government Obstructs Justice to Protect the IRS
Critical action alert America in crisis
Federal court eliminates free speech and right to defend
The First Amendment provides government shall make no law abridging our rights to freedom of speech, freedom to peacefully assemble and freedom to petition the government for redress of grievances.
Why then is the government suing Mark and Claudia Hirmer and eleven others to put them in federal prison, censor and punish their speech disclosing a major government fraud with respect to the federal income tax?
Listen to the interview with Attorney Jeff Dickstein here:
http://www.republicmagazine.com/webinar/jeff-dickstein-discusses-supreme-court-case-hirmer-v-united-states.html
See the websites for the whole story.
http://www.fightbacknow.us/fight.aspx
http://jeffdickstein.com/
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/12/juries-can-stop-runaway-government-you.html
http://fija.org/about/fijas-purpose/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Federal court eliminates free speech and right to defend
The First Amendment provides government shall make no law abridging our rights to freedom of speech, freedom to peacefully assemble and freedom to petition the government for redress of grievances.
Why then is the government suing Mark and Claudia Hirmer and eleven others to put them in federal prison, censor and punish their speech disclosing a major government fraud with respect to the federal income tax?
Listen to the interview with Attorney Jeff Dickstein here:
http://www.republicmagazine.com/webinar/jeff-dickstein-discusses-supreme-court-case-hirmer-v-united-states.html
See the websites for the whole story.
http://www.fightbacknow.us/fight.aspx
http://jeffdickstein.com/
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/12/juries-can-stop-runaway-government-you.html
http://fija.org/about/fijas-purpose/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
A Dire Warning for Catholics in the United States.
An episode of the Vortex from RealCatholicTV.com daily commentary on politics, religion and the Church.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVN2MMuiedI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVN2MMuiedI
We're the Government -- and You're Not
What if the U.S. government released an "educational video" to teach today's Americans how to be good citizens?
Comment by Scott Booth on Resistnet:
Lincoln said, " that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Well Mr Lincoln it seems you were wrong, becouse perishing it is right before our eyes, and has been for 100 years.
Comment by Ken Bittner on Resistnet:
Tongue in cheek...yet says it all!
Just why do the two (controlling political parties (which are really just one party with two heads)) get to make the rules on how many other parties there can be? Sounds like protect your a** to me!
Here are some conclusions and solutions!
Dr. Edwin Vieira, writing in The Daily Bell about Coming Military Crackdown and What Can Be Done to Stop It.
http://www.thedailybell.com/724/Edwin-Vieira-the-Coming-Military-Crackdown.html
Benedict D. LaRosa
The real problem is lack of the rule of law as in a Republic:
http://www.primum-mobile.net/009/his1.html
The real question is "How much of this tyranny will the American People take before they stand up and fight for their God Given rights?"
Only you can answer that.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/09/when-is-it-time-to-fight.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/12/second-american-revolution-will-not-be.html
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Comment by Scott Booth on Resistnet:
Lincoln said, " that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Well Mr Lincoln it seems you were wrong, becouse perishing it is right before our eyes, and has been for 100 years.
Comment by Ken Bittner on Resistnet:
Tongue in cheek...yet says it all!
Just why do the two (controlling political parties (which are really just one party with two heads)) get to make the rules on how many other parties there can be? Sounds like protect your a** to me!
Here are some conclusions and solutions!
Dr. Edwin Vieira, writing in The Daily Bell about Coming Military Crackdown and What Can Be Done to Stop It.
http://www.thedailybell.com/724/Edwin-Vieira-the-Coming-Military-Crackdown.html
Benedict D. LaRosa
The real problem is lack of the rule of law as in a Republic:
http://www.primum-mobile.net/009/his1.html
The real question is "How much of this tyranny will the American People take before they stand up and fight for their God Given rights?"
Only you can answer that.
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/09/when-is-it-time-to-fight.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/12/second-american-revolution-will-not-be.html
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Monday, January 11, 2010
The Obama Deception High Quality Full length version
Get the DVD at : http://infowars-shop.stores.yahoo.net/
The Obama Deception is a hard-hitting film that completely destroys the myth that Barack Obama is working for the best interests of the American people.
The Obama phenomenon is a hoax carefully crafted by the captains of the New World Order. He is being pushed as savior in an attempt to con the American people into accepting global slavery.
We have reached a critical juncture in the New World Order's plans. It's not about Left or Right: it's about a One World Government. The international banks plan to loot the people of the United States and turn them into slaves on a Global Plantation.
Covered in this film: who Obama works for, what lies he has told, and his real agenda. If you want to know the facts and cut through all the hype, this is the film for you.
Watch the Obama Deception and learn how:
- Obama is continuing the process of transforming America into something that resembles Nazi Germany, with forced National Service, domestic civilian spies, warrantless wiretaps, the destruction of the Second Amendment, FEMA camps and Martial Law.
- Obama's handlers are openly announcing the creation of a new Bank of the World that will dominate every nation on earth through carbon taxes and military force.
- International bankers purposefully engineered the worldwide financial meltdown to bankrupt the nations of the planet and bring in World Government.
- Obama plans to loot the middle class, destroy pensions and federalize the states so that the population is completely dependent on the Central Government.
- The Elite are using Obama to pacify the public so they can usher in the North American Union by stealth, launch a new Cold War and continue the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
The Obama Deception is a hard-hitting film that completely destroys the myth that Barack Obama is working for the best interests of the American people.
The Obama phenomenon is a hoax carefully crafted by the captains of the New World Order. He is being pushed as savior in an attempt to con the American people into accepting global slavery.
We have reached a critical juncture in the New World Order's plans. It's not about Left or Right: it's about a One World Government. The international banks plan to loot the people of the United States and turn them into slaves on a Global Plantation.
Covered in this film: who Obama works for, what lies he has told, and his real agenda. If you want to know the facts and cut through all the hype, this is the film for you.
Watch the Obama Deception and learn how:
- Obama is continuing the process of transforming America into something that resembles Nazi Germany, with forced National Service, domestic civilian spies, warrantless wiretaps, the destruction of the Second Amendment, FEMA camps and Martial Law.
- Obama's handlers are openly announcing the creation of a new Bank of the World that will dominate every nation on earth through carbon taxes and military force.
- International bankers purposefully engineered the worldwide financial meltdown to bankrupt the nations of the planet and bring in World Government.
- Obama plans to loot the middle class, destroy pensions and federalize the states so that the population is completely dependent on the Central Government.
- The Elite are using Obama to pacify the public so they can usher in the North American Union by stealth, launch a new Cold War and continue the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Ron Paul on MSNBC's The Rachel Maddow Show
by Rachel Maddow
MSNBC
Thu, Jan 7th, 2010
On Wednesday, Congressman Paul appeared on MSNBC's The Rachel Maddow Show to discuss the lack of difference between the two major parties, as well as the public's growing frustration with the political establishment.
MSNBC
Thu, Jan 7th, 2010
On Wednesday, Congressman Paul appeared on MSNBC's The Rachel Maddow Show to discuss the lack of difference between the two major parties, as well as the public's growing frustration with the political establishment.
New "Don't Tread On Me Movie" Trailer
Where is Your Line In The Sand? More and more Americans are answering that question everyday. -
Greatest Fraud Against USA in History?
What if it's true? What if Barack Obama was really inelligible to be president?
Do you realize what that means? Do you realize that absolutely everything he has done including every stimulus and bailout bill he has signed would all be NULL and VOID, as if it had never been done? Do you understand that all that money would be obtained by fraud?
For lots more on these issues, and an indictment of Obama and all his
"henchmen" see this link:
http://americangrandjury.org/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Do you realize what that means? Do you realize that absolutely everything he has done including every stimulus and bailout bill he has signed would all be NULL and VOID, as if it had never been done? Do you understand that all that money would be obtained by fraud?
For lots more on these issues, and an indictment of Obama and all his
"henchmen" see this link:
http://americangrandjury.org/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Representative Deal Challenges Obama’s Eligibility
FIRST TIME IN U.S. HISTORY THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT’S ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONED BY MEMBER OF CONGRESS
The Post & Email
Wednesday, January 06, 2010 A.D.
(Jan. 5, 2010) — The Post & Email can publicly confirm that on the first of December, last, U.S. Congressman Nathan Deal (GA-R) challenged the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency.
Todd Smith, Chief of Staff for Representative Nathan Deal of the United States House of Representatives serving Georgia’s 9th district, has confirmed today that Deal has sent a letter to Barack Hussein Obama requesting him to prove his eligibility for the office of President of the United States of America. The letter was sent electronically the first of December 2009 in pdf format, and Mr. Smith said that Representative Deal has confirmation from Obama’s staff that it has been received. The letter did not have additional signatories. It originated solely from Representative Deal.
Read this blockbuster article here:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/05/deal-challenges-obamas-eligibility/
The Post & Email
Wednesday, January 06, 2010 A.D.
(Jan. 5, 2010) — The Post & Email can publicly confirm that on the first of December, last, U.S. Congressman Nathan Deal (GA-R) challenged the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency.
Todd Smith, Chief of Staff for Representative Nathan Deal of the United States House of Representatives serving Georgia’s 9th district, has confirmed today that Deal has sent a letter to Barack Hussein Obama requesting him to prove his eligibility for the office of President of the United States of America. The letter was sent electronically the first of December 2009 in pdf format, and Mr. Smith said that Representative Deal has confirmation from Obama’s staff that it has been received. The letter did not have additional signatories. It originated solely from Representative Deal.
Read this blockbuster article here:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/01/05/deal-challenges-obamas-eligibility/
Letter to Glenn Beck from Stephen Pigeon
Dear Mr. Beck:
You are ill-informed on the “birther” issue. Barack Obama, by his own admission, was a British subject at birth. He has never denied having a Kenyan father, who himself was a British subject as a Kenyan native. This is easly established under the British Nationality Act of 1948. He is therefore disqualified to run for the office of the President, because the office is not available to subjects of other governments. The issue is very simple, and very obvious. Obama himself admitted that he wasn’t a natural born citizen when he debated Alan Keyes in 2004.
Let’s see you deal with this one. There is nothing “nutty” about it, and it doesn’t depend on whether his maternal grandmother tried to cover up a foreign birth in Hawaii by placing newspaper notices. It is as plain as your face. BHO is a foreign national first, and an American secondarily, if at all. That is why he thinks there are 57 states; why he doesn’t understand the constitution; why he wants to give us Britain’s health care system (it’s all in the teeth, don’t you know); why he thinks Interpol should have greater authority in the US than US law enforcement; etc. He is a British subject and has no business holding the office of POTUS.
If you think you can overlook this constitutional crisis as not part of the Rubicon, you are mistaken. One constitutional overlook breeds another and the next thing you know, the financial industry is nationalized, the auto industry is nationalized, the health care industry is about to be nationalized, and the energy industry will soon be nationalized.
Ultimately, it is all going to be okay, because socialism only lasts until other people’s money (OPM) runs out, and binge spender BHO has spent all the money we have and all the money we will ever have for the next several generations. He spent all of this before he got his socialist healthcare on the table. He and his wife have partied like Eddie Murphy in The Distinguished Gentleman (1992) since taking office, while he has busied himself with overthrowing the constitutional republic, establishing a new Islamic empire worldwide, disarming and crippling America, and unilaterally dividing Israel and Jerusalem. The only budget constraint for Obama is ink and paper (and he is working his way around that) and his foreign policy advisor appears to be “mirror, mirror on the wall”. He has bankrupted the nation, which the sleeping Oprah watchers are now discovering for the very first time. The reality of the bankruptcy will hit home with gusto in 2010. Not only will we suffer with 30% unemployment, a complete collapse of real estate, and a complete collapse of the dollar, we will also suffer the slings and arrows of dramatic military defeats, as we let this foreigner steer the ship of state. Most Americans have no idea how bad it is going to get.
As for Obama: he will be one of history’s most reviled figures - on a par with Nero - as a fool who couldn’t even understand that when he denigrated the United States, he was destroying the very state upon which his safety and his legacy depended. He will suffer dramatic defeat in Afghanistan and Iraq - it will not be like Viet Nam, and his name will be tarred with it. It will be more like the disastrous defeat of Xerxes at Salamis, or the Ottomans at Sisek, or the Moors at Tours; a game changing defeat that will forever cement the destiny of the republic known as the United States of America. Obama will join the other names in history who suffered cataclysmic losses in the lands of Magog.
His legacy? A communist, collectivist fool, brainwashed by red diaper doper babies haunting the halls of ivy league academia whose agenda was to bring back the failed Bolshevik revolution worldwide, who brought his fully bloomed ignorance to power illegally in the US because of the needs of his narcissistic ego, whose illegitimacy caused the US to go bankrupt and to suffer its worst military setbacks in the history of the nation in just a few short months. History will marvel at the foolishness of Americans, and historians will wonder how we as a people could have allowed this to happen. Then, of course, historians will ultimately conclude that the demise of the greatest nation the world had ever known happened because the watchdogs whose duty it was to warn Americans of such possibilities - the so-called news media - conspired with foreign powers and global financial criminals to destroy America from the inside, as a result of their cowardice, malevolence and silence.
Glen Beck: a media persona who simply could not bring himself to utter the truth about Obama - that he is a usurper, holding the presidency illegally and unconstitutionally, because he is without a legal birthright. Let us never forget who shirked their duty to tell the truth in these last hours, and let us not allow history to forget.
STEPHEN PIDGEON
Read the entire article here:
http://americangrandjury.org/glenn-becks-ratings-from-the-left-just-climbed-by-99
You are ill-informed on the “birther” issue. Barack Obama, by his own admission, was a British subject at birth. He has never denied having a Kenyan father, who himself was a British subject as a Kenyan native. This is easly established under the British Nationality Act of 1948. He is therefore disqualified to run for the office of the President, because the office is not available to subjects of other governments. The issue is very simple, and very obvious. Obama himself admitted that he wasn’t a natural born citizen when he debated Alan Keyes in 2004.
Let’s see you deal with this one. There is nothing “nutty” about it, and it doesn’t depend on whether his maternal grandmother tried to cover up a foreign birth in Hawaii by placing newspaper notices. It is as plain as your face. BHO is a foreign national first, and an American secondarily, if at all. That is why he thinks there are 57 states; why he doesn’t understand the constitution; why he wants to give us Britain’s health care system (it’s all in the teeth, don’t you know); why he thinks Interpol should have greater authority in the US than US law enforcement; etc. He is a British subject and has no business holding the office of POTUS.
If you think you can overlook this constitutional crisis as not part of the Rubicon, you are mistaken. One constitutional overlook breeds another and the next thing you know, the financial industry is nationalized, the auto industry is nationalized, the health care industry is about to be nationalized, and the energy industry will soon be nationalized.
Ultimately, it is all going to be okay, because socialism only lasts until other people’s money (OPM) runs out, and binge spender BHO has spent all the money we have and all the money we will ever have for the next several generations. He spent all of this before he got his socialist healthcare on the table. He and his wife have partied like Eddie Murphy in The Distinguished Gentleman (1992) since taking office, while he has busied himself with overthrowing the constitutional republic, establishing a new Islamic empire worldwide, disarming and crippling America, and unilaterally dividing Israel and Jerusalem. The only budget constraint for Obama is ink and paper (and he is working his way around that) and his foreign policy advisor appears to be “mirror, mirror on the wall”. He has bankrupted the nation, which the sleeping Oprah watchers are now discovering for the very first time. The reality of the bankruptcy will hit home with gusto in 2010. Not only will we suffer with 30% unemployment, a complete collapse of real estate, and a complete collapse of the dollar, we will also suffer the slings and arrows of dramatic military defeats, as we let this foreigner steer the ship of state. Most Americans have no idea how bad it is going to get.
As for Obama: he will be one of history’s most reviled figures - on a par with Nero - as a fool who couldn’t even understand that when he denigrated the United States, he was destroying the very state upon which his safety and his legacy depended. He will suffer dramatic defeat in Afghanistan and Iraq - it will not be like Viet Nam, and his name will be tarred with it. It will be more like the disastrous defeat of Xerxes at Salamis, or the Ottomans at Sisek, or the Moors at Tours; a game changing defeat that will forever cement the destiny of the republic known as the United States of America. Obama will join the other names in history who suffered cataclysmic losses in the lands of Magog.
His legacy? A communist, collectivist fool, brainwashed by red diaper doper babies haunting the halls of ivy league academia whose agenda was to bring back the failed Bolshevik revolution worldwide, who brought his fully bloomed ignorance to power illegally in the US because of the needs of his narcissistic ego, whose illegitimacy caused the US to go bankrupt and to suffer its worst military setbacks in the history of the nation in just a few short months. History will marvel at the foolishness of Americans, and historians will wonder how we as a people could have allowed this to happen. Then, of course, historians will ultimately conclude that the demise of the greatest nation the world had ever known happened because the watchdogs whose duty it was to warn Americans of such possibilities - the so-called news media - conspired with foreign powers and global financial criminals to destroy America from the inside, as a result of their cowardice, malevolence and silence.
Glen Beck: a media persona who simply could not bring himself to utter the truth about Obama - that he is a usurper, holding the presidency illegally and unconstitutionally, because he is without a legal birthright. Let us never forget who shirked their duty to tell the truth in these last hours, and let us not allow history to forget.
STEPHEN PIDGEON
Read the entire article here:
http://americangrandjury.org/glenn-becks-ratings-from-the-left-just-climbed-by-99
Get Out of Our House - Goooh.com
A non-partisan plan to replace the politicians.
Watch the videos then go to the website and help.
http://goooh.com/home.aspx
Tell us in the comment section below what you think about this effort.
Just click on comments below this article and write your mind.
"If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." Samuel Adams, 1776
Watch the videos then go to the website and help.
http://goooh.com/home.aspx
Tell us in the comment section below what you think about this effort.
Just click on comments below this article and write your mind.
"If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." Samuel Adams, 1776
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Gerald Celente Predictions for 2010
World War III?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/celente/celente21.1.html
Three important Audios by Gerald Celente. 2010 Will NOT be a good year for the USA.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/celente/celente21.1.html
Three important Audios by Gerald Celente. 2010 Will NOT be a good year for the USA.
Monday, January 4, 2010
ORGANIZED CRIME AND GOVERNMENT -- The Gang Mentality
The Big Problem Nobody Seems to Have a Solution For!
By Michael LeMieux
January 4, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
Things are going well when a man enters the store wearing a black suit coat and a fedora. He walks straight up to the counter not looking at any of the merchandise and he locks his eyes with yours. “Who is the owner here?” he asks. You reply that you are. He then proceeds to tell you that for the privilege of operating this business and for the protection he provides he demands that you pay him thirty percent of all the profit from your business. He further tells you that if you refuse then some very bad things just might happen and you could lose it all.
We have seen this scenario played out many times in old movies of the gangster lore. The mobster would demand protection payments even when the protection you are paying for was from that very same gang. And if you did not pay you would end up losing everything.
Now I am going to ask what some would deem a ridiculous question; what is the difference between the government and organized crime?
Read the whole Article on the Problem here:
http://www.newswithviews.com:80/LeMieux/michael103.htm
The Solutions!
Now Read the Solutions here:
http://fija.org/
http://americangrandjury.org/
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/
http://sheriffmack.com/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
By Michael LeMieux
January 4, 2010
NewsWithViews.com
Things are going well when a man enters the store wearing a black suit coat and a fedora. He walks straight up to the counter not looking at any of the merchandise and he locks his eyes with yours. “Who is the owner here?” he asks. You reply that you are. He then proceeds to tell you that for the privilege of operating this business and for the protection he provides he demands that you pay him thirty percent of all the profit from your business. He further tells you that if you refuse then some very bad things just might happen and you could lose it all.
We have seen this scenario played out many times in old movies of the gangster lore. The mobster would demand protection payments even when the protection you are paying for was from that very same gang. And if you did not pay you would end up losing everything.
Now I am going to ask what some would deem a ridiculous question; what is the difference between the government and organized crime?
Read the whole Article on the Problem here:
http://www.newswithviews.com:80/LeMieux/michael103.htm
The Solutions!
Now Read the Solutions here:
http://fija.org/
http://americangrandjury.org/
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/
http://sheriffmack.com/
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Sunday, January 3, 2010
FEAST OF THE HOLY NAME OF JESUS
Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's
The Church's Year
(Sunday after the Octave of the Nativity or January 2)
For there is no other name under heaven given to men, whereby we must be saved.
St. Peter (Acts 4 v 12)
Read the whole article here:
http://www.calefactory.org/books/goffine/holynameofjesus.htm
The Church's Year
(Sunday after the Octave of the Nativity or January 2)
For there is no other name under heaven given to men, whereby we must be saved.
St. Peter (Acts 4 v 12)
Read the whole article here:
http://www.calefactory.org/books/goffine/holynameofjesus.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)