Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 5100 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns

"Complete disarmament" of the American people
Paul Joseph Watson
Monday, July 16, 2012
The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee "complete disarmament" of the American people under the ruse of preventing war. The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a plan to target "all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons," according to Forbes' Larry Bell.
Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement "is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control."
A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the "fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms". The letter adds that "...the U.N.'s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights."
Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and "international crime syndicates," the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.
This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a "Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World."
Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a "United Nations Peace Force" that would "enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds."
While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, "for the purpose of maintaining internal order," and the UN "peacekeeping" force itself, which would require "agreed manpower."
"The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes," states the document. While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to destroy national sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute the UN as the planet's supreme authority with a world army, the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the abolition of the second amendment has been in the works for decades.
As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive administrations have tried but failed to accomplish -- taking a huge bite out of the second amendment -- is by no means far fetched.
After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.


  1. As you have stated, this has been in the works for a long time. Why, just when things are getting down to the wire, are people, just now, getting upset about this??? We've been warned time and time again to stop such things as this from happening, but we stood idly by, and let it happen! We should have given the UN the old heave ho, again, along time ago! If they want to shoot me for not giving up my guns, then so be it. I'm not going to let them have anything if I can help it. Maybe, one way to help ourselves and others in our area, is to form a strong local militia to protect our people from the government. This whole thing that I've heard with this "Watch" thing if someone is going to be taken during the night that a signal goes out and people come out to that persons site before they're taken away by the authorities and take pictures of it going on, is ludicrous. What good will it do that person(s) if he/she is taken away permanently? The government will do what it wills. We have to become our own authority, and not let this happen. The government has become a traitor/dictatorship against our constitution and people of the USA. We are only upholding the laws of our country, by preventing false accusations and imprisonment. The government, if they do come after us, has, then, declared all out war against its own people and the sacred laws of our land, under the constitution. Well, my friends, I guess its time to stop dreaming and prepare ourselves for the inevitable, because its not far from knocking on our very own doors. I believe it was Patrick Henry who penned the immortal words, back around the time of the American Revolution, that we are going to have to take seriously, once again....."Give me liberty, or give me death!" God bless America! We will need God's help to win this one. (Having trouble with the "comment as" part, so for the time being will be anonymous.)

  2. Your comments are very much appreciated and in order to use the "comment as" feature you must have an account at one of the sites in the list.

    Like you I will not be getting on their helicopter or bus.


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.