Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Sunday, February 10, 2019

No Valid Convention of States Possible

By Anna Von Reitz

I am receiving all sorts of questions about the idea of having a "convention of States to change the Constitution".  The promoters of this idea openly admit that the "States" they are claiming to represent are incorporated entities. 

Our States are unincorporated entities.  And they are not yet organized and qualified to attempt re-writing their own Constitutions or re-chartering their own Federal States of State, much less are they prepared to address the U.S. Constitutions. 

If the organizers of this misbegotten attempt to infringe upon our names in Commerce continue, they will meet us in Court and they will lose. We will also make a formal complaint to the Queen to enforce against them as a our Trustee on the High Seas and Inland Waterways.  They will be arrested and jailed for conspiracy against the Constitution and against the actual living Constituents of this country.

Either these "persons" are so ignorant that they don't know what a "State" is, or they are deliberately trying to mislead people and seize power they don't have in another "similar names deceit" sleight of hand. 

The Missing Federal States of States are incorporated entities, but not the States of the Union.

And only the unincorporated States of the Union can re-charter (our ancestors called it "re-construct") the Missing Federal States of States. 

So, first, the unincorporated States must form and muster and the people operating them must qualify themselves and learn the ropes, then the Federal States of States must be re-constructed and take up their rightful place, and then, finally, we may contemplate a Continental Congress to take up the issue of reforming and updating the Constitutions. 

None of this can take place apart from disciplined and proper action on our parts, so we might as well knuckle down.

People need to cool their jets and learn their lessons and do the actual work set before us.  Maybe if they do, they will learn enough to qualify as actual State Jurors and then hold valid elections for State Deputies, and who knows?  Maybe they will all learn enough to be competent to tinker with the Constitutions? 

Until the people of this country learn the law and the history and do what actually needs to be done, they will constantly be in unnecessary danger of arrest and none of their actions will be taken seriously. 

Can Irishmen vote to change the Spanish government?

Can Israelis vote in Argentina's elections?

Can foreign incorporated "States" change our Constitutions? 

Go figure, everyone --- and especially those who are trying to set up some kind of "Convention of the States". 

P.S. Our States don't do "conventions" for the purpose of amending the Constitutions.  Our States meet in Continental Congresses.


See this article and over 1500 others on Anna's website here:
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.


  1. I don't know who takes care of the website for the National Assembly but they better get that movie off their front page then.
    It's Jim DeMint promoting the Con-Con.

  2. There is an already written constitution entitled “new states constitution “ on the web and calls for NO STATE RADIFICATION but instead presidential referendum.

    1. Without a state radification, it cannot be by we the people. Whoever is writing and promoting is not one of the sovereign people. It would be giving power to one person, a dictator.

  3. If the organizers of this misbegotten attempt to infringe upon our names in Commerce continue, they will meet us in Court and they will lose. We will also make a formal complaint to the Queen to enforce against them as our Trustee on the High Seas and Inland Waterways. They will be arrested and jailed for conspiracy against the Constitution and against the actual living Constituents of this country.
    Just asking for some clarification on where this would all go to court?
    I would think there would already be dozens of court cases in regards to the soveriegnty of the nation and it's inhabitants?
    All comments made without prejudice and all rigts reserved

    1. From Anna:

      It's an international subject matter and would go to international court.

      The United States of America -- the unincorporated version -- would show up and require the foreign corporation to show cause for infringement on our Common Law Trust and Holding Company and our member States. They would not be able to justify their charters.

  4. Please read my article. I like what you are doing, but, there will probably be no revival of America until we comply with God's requirements, specifically the Land Sabbath. Please read my material:

    Also my latest radio show lays it out:

    The marriage supper of the Lamb is nigh. Hallelujah! This is not crazy talk.

    What happened to Candi Lee Liles? (That could be the name of a movie) I wanted to talk to her and she dropped off the map : (

    1. Me too, but she never responded to my messages. That was at least over a month ago.

  5. Wireless corporations not liable for any health or home related incidents
    Again just passing information along
    All comments made without prejudice and all rights reserved

  6. Can the Irish vote in Spanish elections..??

    Can the Isrealis vote to change things in Argentina...!!

    Why not..!! We have immigrates here from every nation on earth and all of them get to vote in our elections, without even being a U.S. CITIZEN....!!

    You can do just about anything unlawfully in this system....No one cares...!! In fact they promote it here and encourage it actually...!!
    You think it's any different anywhere else...!!

    It's all because FRAUD is seen as a "nothing burger" not only in the U.S. but throughout the world...!!

  7. Paul look at the first two paragraphs of Annas article,
    Anna -
    'The Pope isn't polluting Christianity with Islam, he is polluting Islam with Christianity, which is what the Popes have traditionally done since 325 A.D.'
    "The Church Leaders colluding with Constantine just balled up every nasty pagan religion in Rome at the time and guaranteed it amnesty as long as the adherents claimed to be "Christian". That's still the quid pro quo."
    Paul StramerFebruary 10, 2019 at 12:06 PM
    a follower:
    I see no actual documents in those first two paragraphs.
    I have already answered this above.

    Ok Paul,
    Ask Anna for the documents, the paragraphs are from her article posted on a sight by you, and you own the domain name. ?
    How many documents do you believe we have access too, from 325ad.? i can provide man yquotes from history that do tell us a story. Yet you have to be willing to see it. We all must face some uncomfortable Truths on this journey.(i have and i am.) The (lutherans) also have some things to accept also.
    Pre 325ad. Begins in acts 8 This is where the false church begins. With the sorcerer Simon Magus.
    a follower- Constantine was the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity. ... He played an influential role in the proclamation of the Edict of Milan in 313, which declared religious tolerance for Christianity in the Roman empire.
    "Religious tolerance?" So what did this mean? Not going to murder followers anymore?
    Constantine, who ruled from a.d. 306 until his death in 337, recognized Catholicism as an ideal partner of the Roman Empire. As a devotee of the sun cult, his religion was already similar to Catholicism. Constantine’s father had also been pro-”Christian.” Constantine claimed that his conversion occurred when God intervened to help him with the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, where he secured his rulership over the Roman Empire. But he held “Christian” sympathies before that. Constantine was a megalomaniac who realized that by accepting “Christianity” he could rule a religion as well as an empire. (Constantine made sure that after his death he would be buried in a monument at the head of 12 other memorials to the apostles. He considered himself the chief.)

    In 313, Constantine the Great, as he is known today, issued the Edict of Milan. This supreme ruling made tolerance of “Christianity” (that is, Magus’s “Christianity”) mandatory throughout the Roman Empire. Under this edict, the Catholic Church was allowed to own property. The emperor actively promoted “Christianity.”

    In 325, Constantine presided over the Council of Nicaea. At this pivotal gathering of secular and religious leaders, Constantine presided over the establishment of the Catholic hierarchy as the official head of the church. This council formally established the trinity—a pagan teaching brought over from the Babylonian religion into false Christianity by Simon Magus—as official church doctrine. It also legally established Easter, a day named after the pagan goddess Astarte, as a Catholic holiday in place of the biblical Passover.

    The reign of Emperor Constantine, and the developments of the Council of Nicaea in particular, was a major milestone for the Catholic religion. Now that it had the official backing of the mighty Roman Empire, its destiny to be a global religion was assured.

    It was also a major milestone for those who disagreed with the Catholic Church. After the Council of Nicaea, the Roman Empire began to confiscate the property of any who kept the true Passover. In 347, the state began killing Catholicism’s Donatist enemies—a North African group that opposed the church’s alignment with Rome. As Johnson noted, the Roman Empire had become “the enforcement agency of Christian orthodoxy” (ibid). (By the reign of Theodosius in the fourth century, the Roman Empire had over 100 statutes preventing heresy.)

    1. I will remind you here to read again the blue print at the top of the pages.
      "You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

      Anna's opinions are not always my opinions, and likewise the other way around.

      You are bound and determined to create a break in Christ's Church that negates the whole idea that the Universal Church is not the same as the Catholic Church. Is that because you want to be free to break some of the rules Christ taught through His Church?

      Most protestants throw out the indissolubility of Marriage for example. Most protestants don't agree with the Church on birth control. There are many more. But most of all you deny and disparage the teaching of Papal Infallibility, and most protestants have never read what the Church itself has said about it. So I am going to teach you that right here and right now.

      What does the Church teach about the Pope?

      The list of Popes from the time Christ made Peter the first Pope.


      On the subject of Constantine. Have you ever even read the documents of the Council of Nicaea? I doubt that very much.

      Lets start with Peace of the Church.

      Have you ever read even one word of what Constantine himself ever said or wrote. Well here is your chance.

      Read about the conversion of Constantine here, along with that of St. Paul and St. Augustine.

      Read here about St. Helena, the Mother of Constantine, who found that actual cross on which Christ died.

      Where is the true Christian (Catholic) Church)?

      Where does the word Catholic come from?

      Where does the term Roman Catholic come from?

      The four marks of Christ's true Church.

      Unity, Sanctity, Universal, Apastolic
      otherwise known as One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic

      Unity as a Mark of the Church

      Sanctity as a Mark of the Church

      Apostolicity as a Mark of the Church

      And Catholic (Universal) as a Mark of the Church

  8. 2.Just as John prophesied, the Catholic Church was beginning to use the Roman Empire (the “beast,” in biblical terms) to marginalize, persecute and eventually put to death those who rejected Catholic teaching.

    Emperor Constantine had made Sunday a civil day of rest in 321. In 365, at the Council of Laodicea, the contention over Sunday worship was settled more formally with the enforcement of Sunday—a Babylonian day of sun worship—as the Lord’s Day [referring to Sunday] throughout the Roman Empire. The Council of Laodicea concluded: “Christians must not Judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honoring the Lord’s Day, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found Judaizing, let them be anathema from Christ.”

    In other words, those who kept the Sabbath on Saturday were branded heretics deserving of death.
    Catholic World (August 1871): 735:
    We do not accept it [i.e., the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America], or hold it to be any government at all…If the American Republic is to be sustained and preserved at all, it must be by the rejection of the principle of the [Protestant] Reformation, and the acceptance of the Catholic principle...
    Dr. William P. Grady:
    During a sermon in 1850, [Roman Catholic] Archbishop John Hughes of New York, the nation’s leading Vatican spokesman, acknowledged that a conspiracy to subjugate free America did exist after all. The Catholic press was ecstatic. An excerpt from ‘Shepherd of the Valley’, the official journal of the [Roman Catholic] Bishop of St. Louis, declared, ‘If Catholics ever gain a sufficient numerical majority in this country, religious freedom is at an end. So our enemies say, so we believe.’ [Catholic Archbishop] Hughes’ own paper, the ‘New York Freeman’ brazenly announced, ‘No man has a right to choose his religion.’Words from the Popes themselves:
    In 1302 Pope Boniface said this in a letter to the Catholic Church:
    "Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman"
    Further Quotes from Vatican Documents show the Papacy's belief in Papal Infallibility:
    In 1512 Christopher Marcellus said this to Pope Julius II:
    Take care that we lose not that salvation, that life and breath which thou hast given us, for thou art our shepherd, thou art our physician, thou art our governor, thou art our husbandman, thou art finally another God on earth (emphasis added).iii

    1. i hope you and others can see a repeated history and a problem here?
      And to others, this does not mean the True set apart assembly, ("church") does not yet exist. it just means that yes many of us have been misled through many generations.

    2. Christ is NOT divided against himself. He founded ONE Church, and he made it mandatory for the salvation of each and very soul.

      There is NO freedom of religion in a sense that we can pick and choose what religion we can be saved in. There is only one, and that one is the one Christ himself founded and is the head of.

      The only question then that should concern us is WHICH IS THAT CHURCH? I have already treated that subject. So here is the Church teaching on Religious Toleration.

      I have now presented what the Church has actually taught about these subjects from Catholic sources mostly from theology that is many centuries old.

      From this point forward I will limit the subjects of people's comments to the subjects of the article they appear under.

      I am spending way too much time moderating these comments, so everyone needs to make sure to stay on topic or you might find your comments deleted.

  9. I suggest you all look at the following
    All comments made without prejudice and all rights reserved

  10. Here in Texas NCTCOG and various other private membership organizations carrying out the implementation of UN Agenda 21
    I see them taking farm land every day building stack and pack housing everywhere - SMART signs going up everywhere and their walkable, bikeable initiatives - live here, eat here, stay in here period because their dam straight are not any jobs in the area to make a living except their retail shit they have set up and of course all of the products sold in these stores is created using slave labor like this in Africa
    So while the bankers create no go zones, which by the way is most of the land mass all across the world, this is their sustainable new green deal living
    And while your at it check out those behind the scenes when it comes to geoengineering and the end result they are after
    Again I say if there is a remedy tha Anna has then it needs to be executed ASAP because the bankers and the UN are working night and day to create their new world order feudal system
    Even if you do free your name what is the result?
    So far not one hospital nor doctor held accountable for the birth certificate fraud so every day infants are born and the fraud continues
    Not to mention now they can just outright kill the infant at birth and my guess is they will create the bond anyway and cash in on that too not to mention they need to depopulate the useless eaters as per the UN Agenda
    All comments made without prejudice and all rights reserved