Public International Notice -- Witness Required

 By Anna Von Reitz

Like foxes being inexorably driven to ground, the Mayors of the Inner City of London, representing the Governments of Westminster and Ghent, are seeking to evade our email Notices and communications.  They have thus far changed their email contacts three (3) times in two years seeking to avoid the Truth. 

The Truth is that they have knowingly, willfully, and with malice conducted commercial war against us, the American Government and People, with whom they have several venerable treaties and contracts for services.  This reeks of Bad Faith and worse Performance, which no doubt they wish to conceal so that their other customers and Treaty Partners are not alarmed. 

However, they have done what they have done.  They have acted as Privateers and sailed against the very People they are obligated under contract to protect.  

They have worked a gigantic impersonation and barratry scheme against the people of the entire world, and have unjustly enriched themselves by doing so.  They have used the banks under their influence and the attorneys under their training to promote these crimes, which have in turn, allowed them to mischaracterize and misrepresent millions of innocent people as THINGS --- mere corporations that are subject to commercial and statutory law.  

They have wantonly infringed upon the Trademarks of living people to create fictional Legal Persons appearing to operate under the same Trademark and Name.  In doing so, they have impersonated living people and colluded to traffick these fabricated Persons into foreign jurisdictions for purposes of barratry.

These acts and performances are Crimes Against Humanity and are, so far as we are concerned, the Final Straw in a long history of crime associated with these "Gentlemen". 

As criminals in avoidance of the Public Law of this country and acting in avoidance of their Treaty obligations and  avoidance of their commercial contracts, and as criminals in flight from the International Law, they are not owed any special further Notice regarding their own actions. 

The origin of the current rampage of criminality has its immediate cause rooted in events occuring during the reign of King Henry VIII, amounting to his unlawful and immoral "Enclosure Acts" and the similar errors promoted during the brief and bloody hegemony of Oliver Cromwell, none of which interests us or the rest of the world, except that it provided a recipe for crime against living people that has endured to the present day and which has been repeatedly rebuffed over the course of four centuries and that scheme is summarized thus: 

"1703 – Annuities are motivation for crime:  if a person is considered lost at sea, abandoned, dead, a lunatic, a minor or incompetent (has a Cestui Que Vie Trust) then not only may their property be held in guardianship, but that a contract may be established called an "annuity" whereby a value may be granted to the guardian or custodian by the purchaser of the contract in exchange for some form of ongoing income derived from maximising the value of the estate of the infant, lunatic, lost or "dead" person. The result is the birth of annuities through such acts of parliament as Life Annuities in 1703 .  

See the 28 Million Pounds from Annuities act of 1801 listed in sequence.  Annuities depend on the existence of Cestui Que Vie Trusts."

We have already announced to the world that Prince Philip received exactly this kind of "annuity payment" in the amount of $950 Trillion USD paid to him by the GOVERNOR OF OTTAWA  exactly three days prior to his retirement from Public Office in April of 2017.  This proves that the British Government was involved in an illegal insurance scam and fraud scheme. With the collusion of the Vatican these interests created and operated Cestui Que Vie Trusts against the interests of the living people of Canada and The United States ---and received the loot from this crime scheme from a colluding Municipal Corporation operating in Canada, dba OTTAWA.  

We have reason to suspect that these activities were also pursued throughout Australia and New Zealand, other former members of the British Commonwealth, and the occupied nations of Europe. 

The only way they could pull this off was via the collusion and cooperation of the Lord Mayors of the Inner City of London and their government in contravention of our Treaties of Westminster and Treaties of Ghent. 

These Bad Actors deliberately entrapped, mischaracterized, and misrepresented millions of Americans and Canadians as incompetent minors and in the case of Americans, as infant decedants voluntarily waiving their birthright political status and estates as Americans.  

These are centuries-old white collar impersonation and insurance crimes undertaken in Gross Breach of Trust against their Creditors, Allies, Customers, and Treaty Partners.  The only way they got away with it, is with the full knowledge and cooperation and participation of Westminster and the Lord Mayors.  

It has been our long-term observation and objection to the Prosecutor's Office of the International Criminal Court that securitization is illegal, and in respect to securitization of living flesh and labor, is even more strictly prohibited as it results in peonage and enslavement of living people without their knowledge or consent.  

The leading practitioners of these crimes of securitization and "hypothecation" of debt, Goldman-Sachs, have fled this country for China.  Their partners in these crimes, the United States Attorney Generals who have owned and operated Wells Fargo Bank as a securities brokerage with a banking license, are similarly closing up shop and hoping to escape the just retribution for their acts. 

They have been running a private security corporation as "the Department of Justice' and charging the American people for the service of criminally misrepresenting them and protecting the perpetrators of these insurance scams --- all responsible for bilking the Americans and Canadians and unknown numbers of other innocent people worldwide. These and other so-called "Agencies" have never been instrumentalities of our government, have no contract, and no authority related to us.  

They are to be considered pirates, armed, and dangerous. 

These pernicious criminals were given safe harbor in Britain and through their associations with Britain were given safe harbor in New York and access to the King's Court was arranged through their own State of Delaware which was created and substituted for our American State of Delaware in the confusion immediately after the so-called American Civil War. 

These are all Crimes Against Humanity amounting to human trafficking, genocide on paper, breach of trust, fraud, racketeering, privateering, securitization fraud, impersonation, barratry, armed force extortion, misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, inland piracy, press-ganging, kidnapping, conspiracy against our treaties and constitutions, peonage, enslavement, grand felony theft, treason, misprison of treason, international criminal syndicate collusion, commodity rigging, counterfeiting, money laundering, illegal gambling, insurance fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and commercial fraud. 

No doubt a more complete investigation will yield additional crimes to add to the list.  

The evidence in support of these accusations are self-evidently the "Birth Certificates" which are actually veiled clearinghouse certificates for named CESTUI QUE VIE TRUSTS which stand as evidence of the international crimes committed against unwary Americans and Canadians by British, Dutch, and Canadian commercial interests operating under color of law and conditions of fraud, non-disclosure, and deceit. 

A warning to China is more than merited, as these criminal entities have long-prepared to invade China as their next Host, and they are clearly doing so with the intent to victimize Chinese workers via the same kind of impersonation, barratry, and securitization / insurance scams. The de-camping of Goldman-Sachs to China should be the only proof necessary. 

A genuine international effort to recognize and bring an end to this pernicious crime which has plagued our world and our business environment since the 1600s must be made. 

People are not THINGS and innocence is no excuse for allowing predators to prey upon the innocent.  

                                       By: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                                        The United States of America

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

A Quick Edited Retort

 By Anna Von Reitz

Please consult any of the published Constitutions and tell me where any Federal entity has been granted duties related to disposal of our land or the conduct of our people?   The only reference to the Federal hegemony with respect to land is the ability of the States to grant use of land for arsenals and other needful facilities.  Indeed, the use of land for a Federal Capitol was granted via a special use lease by two States, Virginia and Maryland.  So even the land that Washington, DC, occupies, belongs to two States of the Union. Go figure.  If you don't own the land that sits under your Capitol..... think: what does that imply? 

It implies that you are an employee of the landlords allowing you to be there. And that is precisely the case. 

The only other organic document proposing any role for the Federal Government with respect to our land is The Northwest Ordinance, which allows the Territorial Government to occupy land acquisitions prior to their inclusion as States of the Union.  That is precisely the status of the Insular States like Guam and Puerto Rico to this day.  

I fail to see what your big Bone of Contention may be.  The separation of actuality into living people, lawful persons, and legal fiction persons, is so well established in law that it should not require any explanation or argument.  

The right of a living man to use his Family Name as a Trademark to conduct business in International Trade goes back to the Stone Age.  That's his Lawful Person, the way he identifies his business in International Trade.  Such use of his own Good Name does not make him the property of a government organization, a subject of a Queen, nor a US CORPORATION.  

Our paperwork serves Notice on the Federal Government (which operates as a parent corporation)  and its State-of-State franchises, that we are Americans, not voluntarily adopting any identity as foreign Persons.  There is nothing complex, or controversial about this, but it must be done to forestall their ability to otherwise presume whatever they wish to presume about us.  

Now that that is explained to you in terms that you can understand, what is your beef?  We aren't Federal Citizens.  We have no obligation to be Federal Citizens. And so what?  What business is that of yours?  Why are you all up in arms and flapping around and sending me reams of federal court cases and federal code that does not apply to me or to Americans generally?  

When we delegated certain enumerated powers to our Federal Subcontractors, they acquired the right and the duty to define how they were going to do their jobs.  They do that by posting new laws governing their own employees and officers and dependents on the Federal Register. 

If, which is rare, they create a code entry that impacts the General Public, they publish it on the Federal Record. 

Wake up.  Smell java.  Federal "laws" that aren't published on the Federal Record don't apply to Americans, and those that are published on the Federal Record only apply to Americans when those Americans are engaged in Federally regulated activities or entering Federal buildings, military bases, etc. 

Otherwise, none of the Federal Code and none of their affiliated State of State Statute Law applies to us.  It's literally foreign law. We are not obligated to know or obey it at all.  See Amendment XI.  

What we do need to do is to identify ourselves and our lawful government so that our Employees are not granted the discretion to suppose whatever they may wish to suppose about us. 

That is precisely what we are doing by recording our political status, and it's no skin off of anyone's nose that we do so.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

I Beg Your Pardon.... I Am Not "Difficult" to Get Along With

 By Anna Von Reitz

No, I am not a difficult person and I am not difficult to get along with. I am a typical Great-Grandma.  All I want to do is to clean the house and get things back in order, so that all my kids can have a decent life. 

Simple enough. 

Maybe we will even have a Family Reunion and everyone will figure out that we are related to each other.  

And nobody is any better or different or "more equal" --- contrary to the British Idea.  

I am an American, and by that I mean part of the population of that portion of North America known variously as The United States when referring to the National Soil Jurisdiction, and as The United States of America when referring to our country in International or Global Jurisdiction.  

However, in terms of my Nationality, I am more properly known as a Wisconsinite. 

Like all other Americans, I obtain my nationality from my State of the Union.  

Nationality has nothing to do with citizenship and carries with it no obligations of citizenship.

Citizenship by its very nature implies an obligation to serve a government.  

In America, the government serves the people, not the other way around. 

So, I acquire no citizenship simply by being born in this country. 

That's the way it is and the way it has been since 1776. 

There are people, Tories and Catholics, who accept citizenship obligations to their foreign governments from birth.  Catholics are slaves of the Pope as long as they are Catholics.  Brits are indentured servants of the Queen as long as they are Brits. 

That's their problem so far as the rest of us are concerned.  It has nothing to do with us and it should not be made an issue.  Choice of political affiliation is sacrosanct, a fundamental right. 

If I receive a regular and sufficient employment paycheck from any government, then I have an obligation to serve it as a condition of employment.  

As an American, I have to respect the Constitutional agreements made by the American States, but, by-and-large, unless I freely decide to engage in "federally regulated" activities, the only part of the Constitutions that apply to me are the Guarantees embodied by The Bill of Rights. 

And that's the way it is, folks.  It's going to take one helluva bloody war to change it, so I suggest that the Pope and the Queen and the Lord Mayor and the Secretary-General accept the peace and instruct their loyal citizenry to play fair from now on. 

They know what the contract says as well as we do.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Plan and I -- Public Notice to the Generals 2.0

 
By Anna Von Reitz

Follow the logic:  

Lincoln put the Military in charge of the money, but Lincoln never had authority to do that because he wasn't an American President.  He was a British Territorial "President".  So everything he did was tainted by that fundamental fraud.  

The entire American Civil War was conducted under conditions of fraud and deceit.  It wasn't even a war.  It was a mercenary conflict.  There's no Declaration of War from Congress.  There was no Peace Treaty officially ending it until 2021.  

Lincoln had no authority to adopt the Lieber Code.  He had no authority to set aside the Constitution or any other law in favor of the Lieber Code.  He had no authority to start issuing Executive Orders and he had no Emergency Powers, either. 

His Successors have been just as wrong-headed and their actions have been just as fraudulent and illegal, too.  

The entire basis authorizing the military to act outside its appointed role is flawed and the Constitution governing the Territorial Government was never "set aside".  An action undertaken without authority and  under conditions of fraud is null and void. 

That's for starters, but you will also notice that with that plank in place, there isn't a word in any Constitution granting the Federal Government any control over land or people on the land.  

That's because the Federal Subcontractors had no duties related to the land and people, except for the The Northwest Ordinance, which allows the Territorial United States Government to hold new Territories in a custodial capacity until they qualify to become States of the Union.  

And in the Territorial Constitution, the States may set aside land for the Territorial Government's use for needful things like arsenals, required for the defense of our country.  

There is no valid basis, legal or otherwise, for our hired military to occupy our country, control our money, or anything else promoted by the Lieber Code. 

The Plan to give our land back to Native Americans is obviously illegal, as it is our land and our employees have no role in distributing our property "for" us, but there are other objections. 

Sovereignty is tied to land.  You cannot be a sovereign nation without it.  

So, the Plan is offering to give away our national sovereignty to the Indians. 

Yes, Natives are sovereign now  --- in the same sense that all other Americans born on the land and soil of this country are sovereign, but if our sovereignty goes, so does theirs. 

Otherwise, Natives are members of Tribes and Tribes are obligated to pay Tribute to Rome.  They are slaves of the Pope.  

So what the Plan is setting up is the Status Quo with Perks, basically the same old story, different day. 

According to the Plan, the military retains control of all the money --- not only in America, but worldwide in all the other illegally occupied countries.  How is that any different?  

According to the Plan, our national sovereignty will be undermined and the Natives will be able to act as Tax Collectors for the Pope.  The Natives will have their hands in our pockets and the Pope will have his hands in their pockets.   How is that any change?  

What needs to happen is for our States of the Union to be recognized as the trustworthy custodians of our respective national land assets, and for Public Elections --- not corporate shareholder elections --- to take place for the first time in 160 years.  

What needs to happen is for the military to do its duty to protect this country from invasion (which is happening at our Southern Border) and treasonous Vermin (which is happening in Washington, DC) and otherwise assist in returning the respective national governments of our States to full function. 

The Plan to return funds that are owed to  veterans and their families is fine by us, but the rest of the money needs to be returned to the civilian government of the States of the Union and there needs to be a separate new civilian banking system, too.  

We have such a new civilian banking system ready to go.  The military simply needs to observe its actual limitations and get out of the way of their Employers, who are attending to their own business.  

We wish for the return of all our public and private assets which have been commandeered and socked away in various kinds of trusts without our knowledge or permission. 

We wish for the return of our land assets to the control of our States of the Union.  

We wish for the return of our purloined gold and silver assets and a share of the pre-paid credit assets generated from them.  

We wish for peace and an end to improper Legal Presumptions being misapplied to our people by our subcontractors and an end to illegal occupation of our country by our own military forces. 

We wish for our military to address the threats that various foreign corporations pose to our health and welfare, including Bayer, Monsanto, Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca, and Johnson and Johnson, BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, Goldman-Sachs, the Depository Trust Corporation, JPMorganChase, et alia. 

We wish for our military to address and end continuing Weather Warfare and illegal testing of frequency-based scalar weapons on members of the military and the American Public. 

We wish for our military to address the illegal spraying of metallic salts and industrial wastes on our land and our population and the pollution of our water supplies with similar industrial waste products including Fluoride and Chlorine, and the pollution of our food sources with noxious chemicals and misapplied genetic engineering.  

We wish for our military to wake up and put an end to the politicians and alphabet soup agencies which our government has not authorized, and which have been carrying out "war" against their employers and benefactors.  

We all desperately need to get this country back on track.  That is not going to happen by mindlessly ignoring clear and present dangers and continued predatory action against your Employers.  

             By: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

             The United States of America

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Big Lebowski Revisited - Public Notice to the Generals

 By Anna Von Reitz

The question is, are you Lebowski or is he Lebowski?  Or is someone else here Lebowski?  Will the real Lebowski please stand up?  And then you look at all the guys who stand up.... 

In the near future I expect the Generals to present their answer to the worldwide dilemma which corporate policies promoting "perpetual war" created, and in particular, the problems caused by the fraudulent Administration of Abraham Lincoln and his activities including his establishment of the Lieber Code and the practice of issuing "Executive Orders".  

Turns out that Lincoln wasn't actually our President.  He was the Queen's "president" running a look-alike, sound-alike British commercial corporation doing business as "the United States of America, Incorporated".  

He was operating in fraud from the get-go, and everything he touched was tainted by it.  

Now the modern-day Generals who have replaced those who followed Lincoln's orders and later deposed him, only to take the bit in their own teeth and continue the fraud--- have been forced to consider this lamentable history and its legal and lawful ramifications.  

Not surprisingly, their first instinct was to evaluate the books to see how they and other veterans had been cheated by the banks, and they found plenty skimmed off, Slush Funded, never delivered, siphoned off by legal con-artistry, you name it.  

Their initial answer was to create their own banking system and make the recoupment available to veterans and their families, which is fine by us. 

There is, however, the issue of the civilian Public Interest in all the other recouped funds and the return of private property assets that were swept up in the worldwide dragnet still to be resolved. 

Not everyone has a direct ancestor, husband, father, mother, brother or son or daughter who was a veteran --- by far and away, most of us do, but not all. 

There are groups of religious Pacifists, the very young and the very old who one way or another couldn't serve even if they wanted to, the women who made the gunpowder, the newly naturalized Americans and many others who will drop through the cracks if the funding owed the civilian government is not restored as part of the overall recoupment.  

Moreover, the issues of political status must be squarely addressed.  Ever since the Civil War, all our Veterans have been mistakenly inducted as British Territorial U.S. Citizens, and since the First World War, it has been "presumed" that they "voluntarily" stayed in that foreign political status even after they were discharged from the service and returned home.  

Unless they individually wrote letters to the head of their service branch and informed him (or her) that they were returning home to their birthright political status, it was assumed that they "chose" to remain in the foreign British Territorial political status forever afterward.  

Conveniently, these men and women were never told that they had a choice, and so never realized that action on their part was necessary to recoup their original American birthright political status.  

In this way, they continued to be commandeered and counted as British Territorial Citizens and the Queen's Subjects ---without them ever being the wiser.  

This resulted in millions of military service members being deprived of their native political status as Americans and in continuing foreign citizenship obligations being enforced against them by members of the British Bar Associations even long after their tours of duty ended. 

They fought for freedom they were never allowed to enjoy.  They earned benefits that they were never given.  They were cheated out of their inheritance by sins of omission.

Problem is, whether you are in British Territorial status and functioning as a U.S. Citizen under the foreign international Law of the Sea, or an American standing under the Law of the Land, your name looks the same, you look the same, you feel the same, everything appears to be the same --- except that in one status you are a subject of the Queen and obligated to obey her foreign law, and in the other, you are free and heir to your land and guarantees of the Constitutions. 

I just gave everyone a bird's eye view of this process in the recent "Your Sheriff or My Sheriff" article.  Our unincorporated County Government organizations were unlawfully and without any granted authority converted into British Territorial commercial corporation franchises in the business of providing governmental services.  This allowed these organizations to get payola and kickbacks in the form of "Federal Block Grants" -- but it also converted Public Officers and Elected Officials (like our County Sheriffs) into private corporation employees having no Public Office or attendant authority whatsoever. 

This same process unlawfully converted our election processes from being Public Elections to being private corporation shareholder "elections" orchestrated by political lobbyist organizations.  

An Elector casting their ballot in a Public Election is electing a Public Official who is responsible to the Public Interest and operating under the Public Law.  

A voter casting their vote in a private commercial shareholder election to elect a "Representative" is handing their proxy to that person to do whatever to hell that person wants to do with it--- without any accountability to the individual "voter". 

A Public Official in this country is accountable as a Fiduciary and must demonstrate Good Faith in what they do in the name of the Public Interest.  They also function under Public Law and have to uphold and enforce the Constitutional Guarantees owed to the people of this country.  

An elected Corporate Representative holding proxy votes of shareholders, by contrast, is not liable as a Fiduciary, doesn't have to demonstrate Good Faith, and doesn't function under Public Law and doesn't have any obligation to uphold and enforce the Constitutions. 

This is how the foreign federal subcontractors operated by the Brits and the Popes conspired to evade their obligations to the people of this country and the limitations imposed by the Constitutions.  

As the Generals unveil their big programs for Veterans and the grateful people who are veterans and who have family members who are veterans surge forward to reap all the benefits that they and their ancestors have been denied, there will be new elections held ---- but wait a minute!  What kind of elections?  

Public elections or more private commercial corporation elections?  

Are we going to be electing actual American County Sheriffs to Public Offices or are we going to be electing British Territorial "County" "Sheriffs" to private corporation offices?  

Look sharp.  Hold the Generals accountable. 

The military is supposed to be answering to the people of this country and operating under the limitations of our State's Constitutional agreements with them --- not the British Territorial States-of-States Constitutions that were rammed down our throats in the wake of the Civil War as "emergency" actions undertaken via non-existent "Emergency Powers".  

This whole situation requires the return to our original State Constitutions and in many cases, the writing of actual State Constitutions for the Western States of the Union.  It requires the removal of the present "State of State" Governors and Employees and Legislatures and the return of actual State Delegates and American Governors and American State Legislatures. 

The people of this country have to be educated and enabled to make these choices and recognize the fact that the whole song and dance presented by the Political Parties is foreign.  They have to be made aware of the vital difference between acting as a Public Elector and acting as a Shareholder/Voter in private foreign corporation elections. 

The Generals have to make a clean breast of it or it will be just another fraud scheme allowing the Brits, the Popes, or some combination thereof to keep their hands in our pockets. 

This is part and parcel of my objection to the proposal to "give the land back to the Indians".  

In the first place, the Native Nations are all classed as "dependent Sovereignties" meaning that their sovereignty depends on our sovereignty.  .  Their sovereignty was won, like the sovereignty of all Americans was won, by force of arms by our Continental Army and depends on our treaties and results from being born on the land and soil of this country.  

In the second place, the Native Nations have allowed themselves to be identified as "tribes" owing "tribute" to the Roman Municipal Government. 

So what happens when the Generals give the land back to the Natives instead of returning it to the people and the States of the Union?  The Native Nations assume the right to tax all the rest of us, and the Popes assume the right to tax the Native Tribes, and there you have it all again --- both the Natives and the Popes with their hands in our pockets. 

How long does everyone expect that to last, before the 93% white, black, and Asian population rises up and decimates the quote-unquote "Native" population? 

This is just a recipe for disaster in which, once again, some pigs are being defined as "more equal" than other pigs, and the Popes keep their fingers in the pie. 

For that reason, there can be no settlement in which Native Tribes receive title or patent or anything else related to the land jurisdiction of the States and people. 

The interests and treaties owed to the States must be honored or there is no settlement agreement and no national sovereignty available to anyone including the Native Nations. 

Private property must be returned under terms agreeable to the actual owners or there is no settlement.  

                                              By: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

                                               The United States of America

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Sunday Sermon • Low Sunday • 2022 Fr. Martin Skierka

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXfI3N0AP7E

Filmmaker: Documentary Proves Rampant Illegal Vote Trafficking in 2020

 https://www.theepochtimes.com/documentary-will-prove-proves-rampant-illegal-vote-trafficking-in-2020-dsouza-says_4426541.html

Robert Barnes: The Left Is Running Scared Attempting To Trigger Civil War

 https://battleplan.news/watch?id=626465bc60da54281f21de3c

Grandma Plays Donkey Kong

 By Anna Von Reitz

This answer to one particular whiner applies to a lot of people who still just aren't getting it, people who are sitting around waiting.....and waiting..... for someone else to do it for them:  

You can gripe and feel sorry for yourself all you want, while you stand there and engage in "administrative processes" and don't do what I tell you needs to be done. 

Do you need an administrative process?   No.   You are not part of their system.  Neither are, or were,  your two cars.  

The ONLY reason they get away with this, is that our Assemblies aren't providing the Court functions for our own people.  

It is the United States Attorney's job to defend United States Land Patents and Patent-Holders.   It is the Provost Marshal's job to defend people and their property from illegal confiscation.  Neither one of these offices do their jobs because there is nobody home to give them the Orders and Indictments needed for them to proceed.   

Get a clue, the "District Attorney" isn't going to serve an indictment against his own Privateers Club members.  No, we have to do that for ourselves or it doesn't get done ---- but guess what?  

The Washington Assembly hasn't been sitting around waiting for someone else.  Oh, no.  For the past two years they have been learning law and pre-qualifying jurors.  

So guess what they did this weekend?   They called their Grand Jury into Session and they deliberated and they issued a Writ of Mandamus with Order to Compel --- forcing both the United States Attorney and the Provost Marshal to get back to work, and, they issued a Criminal Indictment against the "Sheriff" and the "Sheriff's Detectives" and the "County" ---- how do you like that?  That's Law in action.  Actual Law. Not any "Administrative Process". 

Washington heard the message, followed the instructions, did the work, and so they were ready to meet this challenge in an appropriate and powerful way.  

Don't you wish that you had a competent State Assembly and State Court ready to defend your rights?   Ever stopped and thought about why you don't have that when you need it?  

Could it be that while you have been dithering around doing THEIR "Administrative Process" instead of building your own Assembly Court and enforcing your Public Law, they have been getting away with dereliction of duty and every kind of crime for profit? 

Could it be that you are your own problem, because you actually have all the power, but you don't educate yourself and you don't work and you don't organize and you don't bring others together in common cause to get your own courts up and going?

Just sayin'.  As long as you are willing to sit around on your rump and let your employees boss you around and steal whatever they like, and let foreigners operating foreign courts steal you blind and treat you worse than an animal, and enforce THEIR foreign laws on you and exercise CORPORATION BILLS OF ATTAINDER in a country where Bills of Attainder have been outlawed for two hundred years (!!!!) --- well, that's the way it will be.  

So what if it's against the Public Law?  You are the Public and you aren't doing your Public Duty to enforce the Public Law.   So there it sits, all tied up with a bow: The Public Law, The Constitution, The Declaration of Independence.  And none of it means a thing, does it? And why is that?  Again?  And again?  And again?  

It's your Public Duty to populate your State of the Union.  It's your Public Duty to build your State Assembly.  It's your Public Duty to serve as a Juror or elected Court Officer.  It's your Public Duty to know and enforce the Constitutions.   It's your Public Duty to protect your own rights and your own property and to help your neighbors do the same.  And how do you do that?  

Well, Little Jimmy, you put on your Big Boy Pants and you do the job.  Or you sit at home with one thumb in your mouth and another in your ear. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Your Sheriff or My Sheriff?

 By Anna Von Reitz

There are two kinds of cops --- public peacekeepers and private law enforcement officers-- that is, private security personnel hired by corporations to protect their business interests. 

We call the first class of elected public officers peacekeepers. Their purpose is to keep the peace and protect the people and property of a community.   County Sheriffs are the most common public peacekeeping officers in this country, and their paid or volunteer assistants are known as Deputies. 

Unfortunately, as many County Governments  were quietly converted into commercial corporation franchises in the 1960's, the public offices of our honorable County Sheriffs were unlawfully converted into private corporate offices instead. 

Their offices went from being American public peacekeeping offices to being private law enforcement positions obligated to serve foreign corporations---not the American Public. 

The Sheriffs themselves went from being considered "Law Men" to being "Human Resources" and none of this was explained to any of them.  

This change from Marion County to Marion County, Incorporated, was virtually invisible and in most places, it went unnoticed, but it meant that the County Sheriffs went from being the highest ranking Officers of the Law in each County to being the lowest men on the totem pole in a private Law Enforcement hierarchy that was intent on enforcing  Statutes, Codes, Rules, and Regulations instead of the Public Law. 

This sudden sleight-of-hand conversion and the complete shift of duties and concerns away from the best interests of the public to the best interests of the corporations employing these newly redefined "Sheriffs" caused no end of consternation.  

The sudden and self-evident disrespect of Constitutional Guarantees drew attention and led to the landmark Supreme Court case Mack and Prinz v. USA, Inc. --- with USA, Inc., being the foreign parent corporation of the Plaintiff's redefined "County, Incorporated".

The upshot of Mack and Prinz v. USA, Inc. was that as the employer could not dictate away the Public Duty each man owed to his country and community, it would be left to the Sheriff's personal discretion whether or not to uphold the Constitutional Guarantees owed to the people in his community. Likewise it would be left to his discretion whether or not he would, for example, defend them from murderers or thieves. 

That was no longer his job as "Sheriff" according to the corporation employing him, no matter what the people on the street -- the ones actually paying for his services -- assumed.  Instead, his job was to make money for the corporation and protect the corporation's interests at the expense of the people actually paying his salary and benefits. 

You can well imagine the cognitive dissonance that this caused, both for the men who continued to call themselves "Sheriffs" though they had in fact been unlawfully converted into "Constables" and for the people in their communities, who could no longer count on "their" Sheriff being friendly, respectful, or willing to protect them. 

The United States Attorney General's Office shed some light on this confusion in a series of decisions published as  57 Opinions of the Attorney General 614 (1972), and 60 Opinions of the Attorney General 647, 652-653 (1975), in which it was clearly stated that "Under the common law the duty to attend the justices and magistrates courts lay with the constable rather than with the sheriff." 

In other words, all these "District Courts" whether Municipal Districts (Magistrate Courts) or Territorial Districts (State of State franchise courts) are supposed to receive their security and enforcement from a Constable.   

A Constable?  We don't have Constables in this country, or do we?  

Our Sheriff's Offices were unlawfully converted into foreign Constable offices when the County Governments incorporated themselves, but nobody told us and nobody told them.  So we have British Constables roaming our streets, but they are calling themselves "Sheriffs" just the same. 

This deceit keeps the American People in the dark, confused about why their expectations related to their Sheriffs are no longer being met by foreign corporation Constables masquerading as Sheriffs. 

Just recently I was treated to another tear in the web of deceit surrounding the nature of these foreign "Sheriffs" when one of them brutally attacked and evicted one of our people without cause or warning. This armed "Sheriff" came with no less than seven "Sheriff's Detectives" to man-handle a single elderly woman and her cat. 

Since when have we ever had "Sheriff's Detectives"?  No such office exists in our government, but.... there are Pinkerton Detectives.  Remember? The railroads and coal mines hired these British thugs to bust the Unions.  Nothing has changed. 

These corporate Pukes calling themselves "Sheriffs" aren't our Sheriffs.  They have no Public Office. By rights, they should be arrested for impersonating a Sheriff, but the rest of us have to get off the couch and accept our Public Duty to do that, and have enough people standing with us in the Public Interest to make it stick.  

Every time I think about these foreign corporate marauders swaggering around our streets with guns on their hips pretending to be our Law Officers, our Sheriffs, our Deputies that we pay to defend us and our property ---- I turn ten shades of red, and no, I am not blushing. 

I'm angry to the bone. 

I am angry with the politicians who allowed such a situation to ever develop.  

I am angry with the bovine stupidity and complacency of the people who have made careers as "Sheriffs" without caring that they are committing crimes. 

Most of these phony "Sheriffs" wouldn't know their Public Duty if it bit them in the buttocks, and even if it did, they wouldn't care. 

When these thugs who have no Public Office related to our country broke down my friend's door and started trashing her home, she told them to cease and desist.  She explained why they had no business trespassing on her land.  She told them that they were committing crimes.  

They laughed.  They thought it was a big joke.  Oh, ha-ha, we're going to throw this old woman out on the street and make a lot of money for the bank.  La-dee-dah.  We've got attorneys to protect us.  We're the gubmint.... 

No, they aren't.  They are for-hire commercial mercenaries without any American Public Office of any kind, and those attorneys they depend on are just more lawless hypocrites. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

A New Horizon

 By Anna Von Reitz

I was talking this morning with one of my Marine buddies and in his typical flat-footed way, he said something very profound: we are all victims.  He meant that the vast number of people who work for the government service providers and all the civilians who have suffered have all been victims of the Vermin.  

It's not like the government employees have had any better lot than the rest of us.  In many, many instances, it has been worse, especially for veterans. 

It feels like the dark silent hours before dawn, and we were both feeling that.  The change that is coming has been a long time coming--- the better part of 2,000 years.  And here we are. 

"It may be midnight or midday, he's never early, he's never late....." 

In the days to come it will become apparent who has stood the test and who hasn't.  For many, it will be a time of joyfulness on a scale they never imagined in their wildest dreams, and for others, it will be a moment of shame and public disgrace.  

They were told, as we all were, that those who serve are greatest in the Kingdom of God. Those who have served themselves will be shown up for who they are and what they have done. Those who have served their country and their fellow man will also have their reward.  

Last week I told everyone who was a veteran that they have an opportunity to sign up for their own bank and their own account at: USVETBANK.US --- and they weren't able to, because of technical problems still being worked on at the website.  Try again.  

This is a unique bank for veterans and it is secure and apart from the rest of the banking system.  For anyone who is a veteran this is a gateway to a new level of security and many unique opportunities to serve your community as a civilian, as well as gain access to money and benefits that you are owed as part of the Recoupment Process that is ongoing. 

This is part of a lifetime quest for me, and I am very happy that it is finally coming together. 

Godspeed and God bless each and every one of you.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

The Changing Meaning of "the United States"

 By Anna Von Reitz

This is an effort to clear up a nasty, long-term, pernicious source of confusion that people suffer when they attempt to make sense of historical documents and laws in this country.  It is meant as a friendly aid to all my fellow Americans as well as a help to foreign governments seeking to gain a handle on the scalawags in DC and duplicitous meanings that are, unfortunately, built into the bulk of English Law wherever it may have migrated, including The United States. 

Did you just notice that when we refer to the country as The United States, the definite article "the" is capitalized and made part of the name?   That's important.  This is the Proper Name of our country operating as a Nation.   Even many Americans don't realize how important that distinction is, and so tend to think that "the United States" references our country, but it does not and never has.  

When you see "the United States" it refers to one of several different business organizations or Subcontractors employed to conduct business for The United States.  

In September of 1776, the Continental Congress officially adopted "the United States" as a doing-business-as name for their united former colonies.  This is our first "Mom and Pop" unincorporated business entity name in use by the Congress from 1776 to 1787, when the meaning and nature of "the United States" was changed to refer to the newly constituted American Federal Republic. 

Strictly speaking the Federal Republic did business under the name "the States of America", but it was also constantly referred to as "the United States" and the citizenry of this new Federal Subcontractor were referred to as United States Citizens.  This implied that they were politically affiliated to serve all the organic States, not just one, and a purposeful and rather lengthy process was required of any American State National wishing to change their birthright political status to that of a United States Citizen. From 1787 to 1860, "the United States" reliably refers to the American Federal Republic.  

Then the Civil War shook things up, and once the American Federal Republic became inoperable, the meaning of "the United States" must be inferred from the context.  

Are you talking about the old  American Federal Republic?   Are you talking about the Territorial Government assuming a caretaker role as "the U.S. Government" during the "absence" of the American Federal Republic?  Are you talking about the Municipal United States (one of the other three original Federal Subcontractors) making similar assumptions and operating as "the US Government"? 

We are aided somewhat because the British Territorial "United States" operated under the auspices of The United States of America, our Federation of States, and more typically used the name "the United States of America" when it did so. When it did refer to itself as "the United States" it usually adopted a convention of placing periods between the U and the S, like this: "U.S. Government operations in Taiwan....."  

The Municipal United States Government which was meant to have a very small and restricted role as one of the three Federal Subcontractors has grossly usurped upon its limitations and brazenly co-opted the name "the United States" without any great effort to distinguish between its foreign self and The United States or the American Federal Republic, either one--- but even it has generally observed a style convention of using all capital letters without periods or other punctuation, as in "US Government forces...." or "UNITED STATES CORPORATION".  

These notes will help you sort out which layer of government generated particular documents and which ones you are dealing with at any given moment, which gives you insight into their laws and operations.  

For example, the Federal Code, both those laws that apply "generally" to everyone and which are published on the Federal Record, and those that apply only to U.S. Citizens meaning officers, employees, and dependents of the British Territorial Government which are published on the Federal Register, are the sphere and dictum of the British Territorial Subcontractor that generally does business as "the United States of America".   People working for this level of government are obligated to observe which laws are published on the Record and which are published on the Register -- if you bring it to their attention -- and have to conduct themselves according to Federal Code. 

The Municipal Government, which has grossly usurped against its limitations, is comparatively lawless; the only Federal Code that it honors is Title 50, dealing with War and War Powers.  Otherwise, it has its own Municipal Code  (also known as "Administrative Code") that properly applies only to its officers, employees, and dependents  -- though they will by all means attempt to entrap and presume dependent status on any unwary individual.  This is because members of the Municipal Government fought on the losing side of the Civil War and were required to pay war reparations --- and the more the merrier.  Everyone they could rope into "Municipal citizenship" got saddled with a share of the debt and impersonated as a US CORPORATION. 

US CORPORATIONS were also subjected to foreign Municipal law including CORPORATION BILLS OF ATTAINDER and the presumption of guilt.  

I hope that this provides a helpful road map and better understanding of the multiple common meanings of these three little words: < the United States> and the meaning attached to the various styles of written presentation used to help differentiate between them.  

So now that you know that your actual County is part of The United States, you will be better prepared to recognize active duty members of the military as U.S. Citizens, and also be able to recognize Municipal Civil Servants and US CORPORATIONS that are subject to Administrative Code. 

Are you subject to any of these organizations or codes?   Only if you really are an officer, employee, or dependent of these now-incorporated entities engaged in the business of providing governmental services, or, if you are engaged in a "federally regulated" activity.  

There are only a few actual "federally regulated" activities that legitimately are federally regulated---- those are: (1) interstate commerce -- which means business conducted between incorporated business entities including among their franchises in other States; (2) manufacture, sale, or transportation of alcohol, tobacco or firearms across state borders; (3) foreign maritime commerce; (4) foreign trade in Admiralty.  

As you can see, most Americans are not subject to the bulk of Federal Code. though there has been considerable effort made to entrap and misrepresent Americans as Municipal franchise CORPORATIONS and thereby subject them as "Incorporated business entities" engaged in "commerce" and so,  subject to "regulation" under the Interstate Commerce Clause found in all three Federal Constitutions.   This impersonation of Americans as US CORPORATIONS is to be regarded as a self-interested criminal scheme and opposed at every turn.  

Another revenue and control scheme put forward by the British Territorial Government is an abuse of their ability to "license" service providers.  A license is a privilege to engage in activities that would otherwise be illegal for you to do.  While this is reasonable in the context of setting standards of performance and credentials for their own Service Vendors, it is not reasonable to presume that everyone wishes to be a Vendor to the Federal Subcontractors, nor is it reasonable to deny the right of U.S. Citizens to waive licensing at their own risk. 

Both law and medicine are occupations of common right.  There is nothing preventing an American from practicing either medicine or law without a license.  U.S. Citizens are subject to being licensed to engage in these professions as a condition of employment, and American Vendors seeking federal contracts or seeking to serve Federal Citizens as clients are subject to being licensed.  So if you are not adopting Territorial U.S. Citizenship, you don't need a license.  If you are not intending to serve U.S. Citizens as part of your clientele, you can simply post a disclaimer requiring U.S. Citizens to receive services at their own risk.  

A sore point is that Bar Association Members have hogged space for their courts in our public courthouses and left little or no room for our American Courts.  This must be corrected.  Another sore point is the Territorial Government's presumption that it has the right to limit a physician's right to issue prescriptions for drugs.  Check the list above --- alcohol, tobacco, and firearms are federally regulated.  Drugs and nutritional supplements are not.  

As we all regain a solid knowledge base it will become more difficult for "the government" service providers to extort payments and exercise coercive powers that were never granted to them in the first place.  

Perhaps no area of federal franchise "state of state" organizations' overreach impacts more Americans than insupportable demands that we "register" our private automobiles as "motor vehicles" and that we accept "licensing" as "Drivers".  

A "Motor Vehicle" is a conveyance engaged in commerce and a Driver is also voluntarily engaged in commerce--- which as we have seen, is business between two incorporated entities.   Are you an incorporated entity?   Is your automobile a Motor Vehicle?  Are you engaged in interstate commerce?  Are you a Driver engaged in commercial activity?  

Probably not.  You are probably just an American going from Point A to Point B, maybe to visit your Sister or pick up something for supper at the grocery store, and don't voluntarily participate in commerce at all.  

If you have a Driver's License please pull it out of your pocket and observe that it is issued to a MUNICIPAL CORPORATION gratuitously named after you.  Are you operating a MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, and thereby identifying yourself and your activities as being commercial in nature, and therefore, subject to the Interstate Commerce Clause and Municipal Administrative Code?  

If you think back, you will realize that you were coerced to get a Driver's License and a Social Security Card and also coerced to sign up for Selective Service and Medicare and all sorts of other things, whether they applied to you or not, and whether you wanted to or not.  

You were broadly misinformed by authority figures telling you that you had to do this, when in fact you did not --- and all of those actions, applications, and enrollments served to do only one thing: entrap you into "voluntarily" identifying yourself as a Municipal CORPORATION franchise, responsible for paying war reparations and "voluntarily" subjecting yourself  to Administrative Code and CORPORATION BILLS OF ATTAINDER in a country where Bills of Attainder have been outlawed for over 200 years. 

The foreign Federal Subcontractors both had axes to grind by entrapping Americans in this manner.  The Municipal Corporation and its members got another stooge to help them pay war reparations and more chattel labor assets to borrow against.  The Territorial Corporation obtained coercive control over you and your body, land, homes, and other assets.  

They were all happy, and you, their Employer, were the goat paying them for this "service".  

Happily for the rest of us, numerous voices have been raised to remind Americans of these facts and spread the word.  You don't have to live your lives as slaves or indentured servants subject to foreign governmental service providers.  You can come home, reclaim your birthright, and exercise the rights, freedoms, and material advantages that Americans have always been heir to.  

Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net.   Get started.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 3600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.