Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress
You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.
Tuesday, February 16, 2021
Monday, February 15, 2021
New Publications on the Way
By Anna Von Reitz
It's Sunday, Valentine's Day, and we have some happy bits and pieces for you.
For one thing, you can get your own reformatted copy of my recent article about the "Repugnant Reconstruction Acts and the Imposition of Martial Law in Time of Peace" --- which makes the information much easier to read and sort through, and which includes my Annotations, which will help you sort through which "States" - our Federation States or their Confederate "States" -- are being talked about.
This little gem should be required reading for every American, as it explicitly and authoritatively demonstrates in black and white how we got into this Mess, and sheds much light on what we need to do to get beyond "the Civil War" ---- 158 years after it purportedly ended.
I have asked our webmasters to post the pdf version and it should be available soon.
You will all be encouraged to know that what we are doing as part of the American States Assembly effort is exactly what we should be doing to put a peaceful and lawful end to all the fraud and legal chicanery that has been employed against us by our foreign "federal" subcontractors and the Principals responsible.
We are also working on a new series of educational materials called "Anna's Charts" --- simple chart-form learning aids for "at a glance" comprehension of both the American Government and Federal Government structures, their relationships, and explanation of what forms of law they function under.
We are also prepping a new series of helpful forms and processes that will make it simpler and more effective when you or those you love are trespassed upon by Federal Employees and federated State of State and County Employees.
The new process will combine land jurisdiction recording of criminal incidents under Assembly auspices, and sea jurisdiction complainant forms for expedited service through Article 1 Administrative Courts.
This methodology has proven to be far more effective than any other pathway to justice that we have found to date, for handling a variety of issues including improper Federal Tax Liens and garnishments, CPS kidnappings, misadministration of Probate, improper infraction enforcement of victimless crimes, illegal evictions, and so much more.
We are hoping to soon extend more outreach to the Law Enforcement Community and will be welcoming our first Continental Marshal Graduates this month --- the first Peacekeepers to serve the international land jurisdiction since the de-funding of the Federal Marshals Program more than a decade ago.
As we move forward through the waves of fear-mongering, lies, and deceits we must rise above ignorance and fear and assert our Public Duty to enforce the Public Law, to assure the safety and well-being of our country and our communities. The sooner that all Americans understand their role and rights, the better.
----------------------------
See this article and over 3000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Patterns of Fraud -- Ignorance and the Courts
By Anna Von Reitz
I often get people who ask me if I am a fraud because I am not a member of the Bar, and in their minds, that means I couldn't be a lawyer or a judge.
Patiently, I explain the difference to them. Yes, you can be a lawyer and you can serve as a Justice (technically not a Judge, but higher than a Judge) and not be a Bar Attorney at all.
In fact, in this country, you cannot be a member of the Bar Association and serve in a Public Court intended to address average living people.
That little salvo of factual information sets people back on their heels and causes looks of amazement, but those are the facts, ma'am.
An Amendment to the Federal Constitution prohibiting Bar Attorneys from holding any Public Office in our American Government was ratified by our States of the Union in 1819, and that's the way it has been ever since ---in our States--- as opposed to their States of States.
All the courts that people are familiar with, and which "mistakenly" address our people every day, are federal courts of "strictly limited" jurisdiction -- and they shouldn't be addressing the General Public at all.
Even the State-of-State courts, like the State of Nevada Superior Court, are in fact federal franchise operations and shouldn't be addressing the General Public, either.
But then, until very recently, (1 October 2020) Nevada wasn't really a State; it was still a Territorial "State", waiting for full enrollment as a State of the Union. It's land and soil jurisdiction was in limbo, operated as a State Trust by the Territorial United States Government on a custodial basis under the provisions of the Northwest Ordinance.
The courts that our people see day to day and which they ignorantly assume are their courts, are all either: (1) private courts operating as administrative corporate tribunals or (2) courts operating as "special purpose" courts of "limited jurisdiction", such as the Maritime and Admiralty Courts, which should only be addressing actual sea-faring business contract disputes or military personnel.
This is all part of the generalized fraud, confusion, and mis-administration of the Federal Government, and it can only be answered and corrected by Americans who are awake enough to self-govern.
I am using the courts as an example of a more generalized phenomenon -- the use of ignorance to promote fraud.
The more ignorant a person is, the easier it is to bamboozle and defraud them, so it is in the best interests of the con men among us to keep people dumbed down and ready to accept whatever they are told.
This has been the case and the practice of these criminals since the days of the Roman Empire, when policies were put in place to ensure that there would be a permanent underclass of slaves to support the lavish lifestyles of the elites and the ambitions of the Empire.
The elites of Rome identified themselves via the use of small letters to write their names --- marcus flavius of ephesus, for example. Indentured Servants used Upper and Lower Case to write their names: Marcus Flavius of Ephesus. And slaves, who usually could neither read nor write, were identified by the use of DOG LATIN --- names written in all capital letters: MARCUS FLAVIUS OF EPHESUS.
Need I say more to all of you who have spent years paying the debts of YOUR NAME, and never realized that you were being misidentified and misaddressed as a slave belonging to the Municipal Government of Washington, DC? That is, a "Fourteenth Amendment citizen" who is guilty until proven innocent, and obligated to pay all the debts of your Masters?
These people are not content to wait around for rubes to fall off the turnip truck. They actively promote and create ignorance, so as to make their job of fleecing you easier.
They purposefully omit vital information from your public school education, and make sure that history and civics are "electives" --- and even if you take those elective classes, they are horrifically dull, full of both useless information and omissions designed to lead you to wrong assumptions.
Case in point -- were you misled to think that the Reconstruction following the Civil War was done and over a long time ago?
These predators use "legalese" and "terms of art" to confuse you and make you assume one meaning, when they are talking about something else entirely.
For example, when they say "natural person" they are talking about a dead body, a corpse. When they say "person" they are talking about a corporation of some kind. And how are you supposed to know this?
Well, you're not. And you are not supposed to have anyone to defend you from all this endless guile, either.
The lawyers who are supposed to be your counselors, are instead being dumbed down themselves, and almost all lawyers (present company excluded) are shackled to the dictates of the Bar Associations --- which are being operated as closed Union shops in defiance of the Public Law.
The promotion of ignorance and the abuse of innocent people via ignorance is one of the hallmarks of the Evil Ones, indeed, it is their primary mode of operation ---and now you can see it plainly described and in front of your faces.
You now know why they promote ignorance (to make it easier to defraud you) and you know at least some examples of how they do it (dumbing down in the schools and universities, establishment of a coercive foreign guild/union system to enforce ignorance and/or compliance with their scheme), and you also know why lawyers don't defend you from it (they are either ignorant themselves or they are afraid the Bar Association will sanction them and they will lose their livelihood and position of social esteem).
So, there's the God's Honest recount of the situation. What are we all going to do about it? Besides the obvious mandate to educate 320 million people?
----------------------------
See this article and over 3000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Sunday, February 14, 2021
This Is the Video to Watch: Infecting W/COVID Swab, the RNA Vaccine, Artificial Intelligence
Can anybody refute this video?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/B7bylwK3v3rk/
Originally published on Vaccine Liberation Army this 2 hour documentary exposes everything wrong with what you are being told about covaids. It basically assembles it all together and leaves the choice up to you. Put your hand in the fire and you will get burned. The lie that all men are generally good and have your best interest at heart is completely satanic and anti-Biblical. You can choose to believe it, just as you can choose to stick your hand in the fire!
Situation Update, Feb. 12 – America’s corporations transform into TERRORISTS against the people
Now, Bank of America is also engaged in terror-minded financial crimes against its own customers, surreptitiously scanning credit card transaction records to determine who bought air tickets or made hotel reservations in the D.C. area for January 6th, the day of the false flag capitol “riot.” In utter violation of federal law and the Fourth Amendment, Bank of America turned over these records — without any warrant ever being issued — to the FBI, another terror-linked organization that now operates as the law enforcement branch of Antifa / BLM to terrorize American conservatives and Trump supporters with politically-motivated investigations.
Meanwhile, Disney fired Gina Carano for a tweet where she warned that Leftists in America today were following in the footsteps of the Nazi-linked Germans who vilified Jews during the “cancel culture” of the Third Reich. For pointing out this powerful truth, Gina was fired by Disney, a corporation with a long history of child exploitation and globalist brainwashing.
Hundreds of U.S. corporations gave millions of dollars to Black Lives Matter in 2020, directly funding domestic terrorism of the Left. But those same corporations claim conservatives are the enemy, and they are now weaponizing their customer records, employment offices and merchant platforms to punish all conservatives, Christians and White people for their very existence.
The ultimate goal of this radical, dangerous, authoritarian Left is the mass execution of all conservatives and Christians in America. All they need now is a false flag mass shooting directed at their own people in order to whip up the national call for gun confiscation and the criminalization of conservative beliefs.
Trust me, that day is coming… they are putting together the plans for it right now. You haven’t even begun to see the mass mental illness that will be embraced Left-wing lunatics when they roll out their next false flag operation. It will make Sandy Hook look like a picnic.
Listen to today’s Situation Update — also sub-titled, “That’s Insane!” — for full details:
(Natural News) With the criminal tech giants now maliciously de-platforming James O’Keefe (Project Veritas), Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (Children’s Health Defense), Wayne Allen Root and anyone else who questions the false narratives of the totalitarian Left, we’ve entered a new, dark era where corporations now consider the American people to be their enemies.
This also happens to be the same posture of the Biden regime, which also sees the American people as the enemy, since most Americans didn’t vote for Biden and know the election was rigged.
Pushing the envelope of criminal journo-terrorism, CNN’s Drew Griffin is now engaged in crimes of cyber stalking and harassment in his attacks on Charlene and Ty Bollinger (see video below), doxing their home address while attempting to incite radical left-wing lunatics into committing violence against the Bollingers. While Twitter deplatformed James O’Keefe by claiming he interviewed a Facebook executive in front of his house, Twitter isn’t deplatforming CNN for doxing the Bollingers (because the tech terrorists and media terrorists all work together, of course).
About Russell J. Gould, the Pirate
By Anna Von Reitz
Russell Gould is not a hero. He's a
pirate. Like his pal, Keith Livingway, he stole back our flag from other
pirates (Keith stole back copies of The Articles of Confederation) but didn't
return it to the proper owners --- the American States and
People.
We weren't sure about his intentions, and spent a
week talking to him about all his ideas, explaining the actual history, and
encouraging him ---like everyone else-- to simply come
home.
He instead claimed that he had "captured" the Title
IV Flag for himself and his buddy, David-Wynn:Miller---and away they went to
Rome to cut a deal with the Vatican. Which they
did.
As the actual and factual owners of the flag, it's
capture from the Scottish Interloper and its Successors, is potentially
interesting. If John Lafite captures stolen goods from Blackbeard, he may
return the goods for a reward.
But if not, nothing has changed. Our property
is still in the possession of pirates, either way. And the actual international
law concerning this remains: "Possession by pirates does not change
ownership."
It's still our flag, either
way.
Russell and David-Wynn could have just as
easily come home as the conquering heroes and given the Title IV Flag back to
us, and been rewarded and esteemed for their
actions.
Instead, they stole it from the pirates, didn't
return it to the actual owners, and acted as pirates themselves.
Russell, like Keith Livingway from the Reign of the
Heavens Society, is trying to use our looted property as the basis to set up
shop for their own "governments" --- and as with the Scottish Interlopers, they
are pretending to be the Successors of our lawful
government.
Russell has his own privately copyrighted language,
PARSE SYNTAX, based --conveniently enough-- on DOG LATIN, his own system
of weights and measures, and so on.
It's a complex scheme and one hand-tailored to put
Russell in absolute control of the people who fall for this and who use his
copyrighted language. He will utterly control their ability to communicate,
conduct trade, travel, and do other needful things for the next hundred
years----until his patents run out and his copyrights
expire.
Meantime, he and his followers are happy to seize
upon our emblems and symbols and offices and try to convince us that they are
our saviors while they are attempting to commandeer our government on the High
Seas, and trying to excuse their larcenous capture of the Title IV flag which
they erroneously portray as "the last flag
standing".
We loaned the Title IV Flag to our Employees, our
British Territorial Subcontractors, for their use when exercising our Delegated
Powers in the international jurisdiction of the
sea.
This is similar to loaning someone your lawn mower,
so that they can cut your grass for you.
Obviously, they don't acquire an ownership interest
in your lawn mower.
And it is the same way with our purloined Title IV
Flag.
Mr. Gould is a Third Party, with no reasonable
right to exercise our Delegated Powers or use our flag for any official purpose;
he has no contract with us and we are not obligated to accept his
service.
So that's that. A proverbial Mexican
Stand-Off.
Gould has possession of our Title IV Flag, but it
remains our flag and he remains a pirate. Keith Livingway has possession
of original copies of The Articles of Confederation, but they remain our
property, and he remains a pirate, too, along with the Naval Yard Officers who
sold him these artifacts.
No matter how long or how many generations of
pirates may claim to have this or that bit of far-flung property that belongs to
us, it continues to be our property and they continue to be outlaws, pirates,
and brigands. And that is also the character and fate of those who join them in
their larceny.
----------------------------
See this article and over 3000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Quinquagesima Sunday
Saturday, February 13, 2021
Here You Go, Again, Republicans
By Anna Von Reitz
I have exposed Alaska's US Senator Lisa Murkowski's nature as a RINO for going on a dozen years now, and still, the numbnutz in the Alaska Republican Party aren't listening and won't do their duty by their platform and purported "values".
Oh, Lisa is so cute. I remember her when she was a little girl....
Hanging onto her Mother, Nancy GORE-Murkowski's hand---- GORE as in Al GORE.....GORE as in Chicago Daley Clan..... what does it take? TWO brick walls to fall on their heads AND a complete recitation of her voting record?
Alaska Republicans couldn't find their butts with runway beacons, a lighthouse, two hundred flashlights, a magnifying glass the size of Big Ben, and a thousand hours of Transcendental Meditation. Plus a free roadmap.
She's such a nice person..... until you look at her voting record.
Then you find out that she has sold us out and down the river with gusto at absolutely every turn. She's made a whole generation ashamed of being conservatives. She's guilted Alaskans for standing up for themselves and God forbid, for unborn babies.
She has smugly denied her obligation to actually and factually deliver the benefit of our Constitutional Guarantees.
She has sniffed in her oh-so-very-superior way and left her supporters standing in the slush with their cold feet and confusion, thinking, "but, she's a Republican!"
Right. And I am secretly Charlie Brown, struggling with my transgender issues, and afraid the Little Red-Haired Girl will find out.
What exactly does it take before Alaska's Republicans realize that Lisa Murkowski is a RINO in the same way that POPE FRANCIS is a Catholic--?
Do me the honor of observing the obvious, and join me in saying--- these people are liars. Actors.
Their walk isn't matching their talk.
Or plain old, they speak with forked tongues.
I am not a Republican. I don't vote in corporate elections. Remember? I was disenfranchised back in 1868 via fraud and Breach of Trust.
But if I were a Republican, I'd have sense enough to look at Lisa Murkowski with outrage and something more than a jaundiced eye.
She has betrayed every traditional Republican value there is, except one---- she has protected big banking interests----and done it repeatedly at the expense of all the little unwashed Walmart Shoppers that make up the bulk of the ignorant electorate still voting for this wolf in sheep's clothing.
Now, get ready, because Grandma is going to serve up a big, heaping helping of Voter Remorse for all those Republican voters who have an IQ above 50:
Lisa Murkowski was one of the seven Republicans who voted to impeach Donald Trump based on senseless accusations that he incited insurrection--- and did NOTHING about the filthy BLM and Antifa riots that claimed hundreds of lives and cost billions of dollars in damages this past summer.
Calling them "hypocrites" doesn't even begin to describe these people and their wrong-headed depravity and reckless lack of accountability.
Lisa Murkowski is the one who has incited the feelings that people have for "her" government by betraying both their trust and their best interests for decades, by saddling them down with oppressive taxes, allowing false commercial claims and impersonation schemes against them, allowing deprivation of their rights under color of law,"standing by" in the face of armed racketeering, and all the other evils that she has either promoted or left unopposed.
What do you call a useless Republican? A Democrat.
And that is what Lisa Murkowski, "Republican" Senator from Alaska is --- a Democrat in Republican clothing, shown here with her brothers and sisters.
Let's do the Roll Call of Infamy:
Senator Richard Burr, North Carolina
Senator "Bill" Cassidy, Louisiana
Senator Susan Collins, Maine
Senator Lisa Murkowski, Alaska (Pleah! Blah! Ugh!)
Senator "Mitt" Romney, Utah
Senator Ben Sasse, Nebraska
Senator Pat Toomey, Pennsylvania
These worthless, senseless, disgusting excuses for "Republicans" aren't Republicans. They don't even merit inclusion within the ranks of mankind, based on their betrayal of the American people, to say nothing of their grotesquely deluded electorate.
Among the other problems that we all have to solve, is busting the entire "Fourteenth Amendment" scam---- and finally holding all our Public Employees accountable.
----------------------------
See this article and over 3000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Friday, February 12, 2021
The Constitutionally Repugnant Reconstruction Acts Impose 14th Amendment via Martial Law Powers In Time of Peace.
By Anna Von Reitz
See better formatting of this article here:
Everyone please read the above statement as many times as necessary to glean the grist of it.
Our two (2) foreign Federal Subcontractors have, for their own benefit and enrichment, continued to promote the idea that the Civil War never ended, and that we, the American people, are unknown persons "presumed to be" Enemy Combatants until proven otherwise.
As shill Psyops Officer Robert Horton recounts, they also persist in claiming that the Civil War, which was an undeclared commercial mercenary conflict and not a "war" at all --- was a proper war, allowing them to claim immunity and right of conquest when it wasn't, doesn't, and never did.
This is all just bunko and legally convenient, as-- if this deceit is accepted--- it allows the Territorial U.S. Citizens to presume that we are Municipal citizens of the United States, subject to search and seizure, and it allows the Municipal United States Government (set up as the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia) to presume that we are subject to them and that we owe all their debts.
Neither thing happens to be true.
What is true is that we, the people of this country, and our legitimate government in international jurisdiction, The United States of America [Unincorporated] and our national governments vested in our State Assemblies, are still here, still operating, now in Session ---and together with our members, due every jot of every "Federal" Constitution.
That is what is true and all the rest of this criminal bunk is just that--- bunk.
I am publishing here for the edification of the entire world the stripped down historical research and timeline necessary to come to these same conclusions for yourselves and to explicitly detail how and why this country is still messing around with and suffering from "legal issues" created by an undeclared mercenary conflict that ended over a century and a half ago.
Our deepest thanks to Geoffrey Jacob Caputo and the State Nationals Association for this knock-down, drag-out, and absolutely correct step-by-step analysis of the history, legal actions, and results --- which was completed many years ago, and which stands to inform everyone worldwide:
"I. Constitutionally Repugnant Reconstruction Acts Impose 14th Amendment via Martial Law Powers In Time of Peace 1861 The object of the Civil from 1861 to 1865 was not for the Southern States to be conquered or subjugated.1 1865 January 31 - 13th Amendment Proposed to the States May 10 - President Johnson Proclaimed the end of the Hostilities on land with the only duty left to arrest the former insurgency’s vessels at sea.2 STATES WHICH RATIFIED 13th AMENDMENT February 9 – Virginia ; February 17 - Louisiana, April 7 – Tennessee ; April 14 - Arkansas, November 13 - South Carolina , December 2 - Alabama, December 4 - North Carolina December 4 - Renegade members of the 39th Congress, at the inception of the 1st session on, 1865; suggested the denial of seats in the House and the Senate to the Southern States on the baseless allegation that they had no legal governments and were in rebellion. 3 December 6 - Georgia ratifies 13th Amdmt December 18 - 13th Amendment was declared ratified 4 December 28 – Florida (Florida again ratified on June 9, 1868, upon its adoption of a new constitution ) 1866 March 3 - 39th Congress resolves the denial of seats in the House and the Senate to the Southern States in the house on baseless allegations of rebellion.5 April 2 - President Johnson proclaimed the insurrection at an end in all the Southern States except It was further proclaimed that each State’s civil authority was to be restored and that they had shown sufficient evidence of loyalty to the Union by conforming to Johnson’s policies of incorporating the 13th amendment into legislation.6 June 16 - 14th Amendment (called Article XIV) was proposed by the 39th Congress Ist session by joint resolution 48 to “the legislatures of the several States” .7 August 20 - President Johnson further proclaimed Peace on and gave notice of the resumption of civil government in the States which had seceded. 8 October 1866 to 1867 - Southern and non-southern States reject 14th Amndmt. – Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Louisiana Mississippi, and many non southern states. 1867 February 8 - One month before the first Reconstruction Act was colorably implemented, the 39th Congress introduced Bill 1143 entitled, “A Bill To establish an additional article of war for the more complete suppression of the insurrection against the United States”. 9 March 2 – First Reconstruction Act colorably “enacted”10 ; President Johnson Vetoes The Act11 March 23 – Second Reconstruction Act12 ; President Johnson Vetoes The Act13 July 19 – Third Reconstruction Act14 ; President Johnson Vetoes The Act15 1868 March 11 – Fourth Reconstruction Act16 June 25 - North Carolina, South Carolina, Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida are colorably “re-admitted” back into the Union as a new body politic of a 14th Amendment citizentry due to adopting the 14th Amendment. 17 July 9, 1868 – 14th Amendment COLORABLY IMPOSED due to 28 states’ alleged ratification. II. Constitutional Violations of the 39th & 40th Congresses in Imposing The Reconstruction Acts & Amend. XIV 1 House Journal - July 22, 1861. p.123 / Senate Journal - July 25, 1861.p.92 2 13 STAT 757 Presidential Proclamation 35 3 Senate Journal, starting @ p. 7 4 13 STAT. 774 5 House Journal, March 3, 1866. Page 353 6 14 STAT 811 – 813 7 14 STAT 358 8 14 STAT 814 9 Committee on Reconstruction Bill 1143 10 14 Stat. 428 11 House Journal March 2, 1867 - Page 563 12 15 Stat. 2 13 House Journal March 23, 1867 - Page 99 14 15 Stat. 14 15 House Journal July 19, 1867 - Page 171 16 15 STAT 41 17 15 STAT 73 1. Art. V § 5 of The Constitution of The United States of America (CFUSA) “and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.” Violation: The House Journal, March 3, 1866 - Page 353 1. Art. III § 3 CFUSA says, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort” Violation: The Reconstruction Acts 1. The Reconstruction Acts were inconsistent with criteria for martial law provisions as required in The Constitution for the United States of America. See EX PARTE MILLIGAN 71 US 2 (1866) 39th Congress had no evidence of the states being in rebellion. Civil authority was restored in that the courts of the Southern States were open and the slaves were free pursuant to the 13th amendment. The only Martial Rule which can exist during times of peace according to the Constitution is the code of laws enacted by Congress for the government of the national forces in which martial law could only apply to the soldier and not to the citizen, then the Reconstruction acts were unconstitutional because it applied military law only to the citizen and not to the soldier. 1. Art. I §. 9 cl. 3 CFUSA: says “ No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.” Violation: Everyone in the southern states was, in a blanket fashion, declared guilty of rebellion and penalized via unlawful military rule. 1. Art. IV §. 4 CFUSA says “ The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.” Violation: The 39th Congress unlawfully denied the Southern States a republican form of government by acting contrary to Art. IV §. 4 1. Art. 1 §. 8 cl.17 CFUSA that the Congress is “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dockYards and other needful Buildings . . .” Violation: The 39th Congress exercised exclusive legislation (Reconstruction Acts) outside their District unlawfully. 1. Art IV § 3 says that, “New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.” Violation: The 39th Congress formed a new unlawful, defacto state within each of the several dejure states without the consent of the Dejure state bodies politic. Additional Notes DE JURE. Rightfully; lawfully; by legal title. Contrasted with de facto 4 Bla. Com. 77 How a Dejure state, such as Florida, is formed: [5 Stat. 742.] Statute II. Chap. XLVII.-- An Act for the admission of the states of Iowa and Florida into the Union . . . whereas, the people of the Territory of Florida did, in like manner, by their delegates, on the eleventh day of January, eighteen hundred and thirty-nine, form for themselves a constitution and State government [Act of March 3, 1845, ch. 75 and ch 76.], both of which said constitutions are republican; and said conventions having asked the admission of their respective Territories into the Union as States, on equal footing with the original States: Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled , That the States of Iowa and Florida be, and the same are hereby, declared to be States of the United States of America, and are hereby admitted into the Union on equal footing with the original States, in all respects whatsoever. Florida’s original government could only be abolished by the consent of the people: Florida Constitution of 1838 Article I Section 2 : That all political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and established for their benefit; and, therefore, they have, at all times, an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter or abolish their form of government, in such manner as they may deem expedient. The Reconstruction Acts were constitutionally repugnant war powers which abolished The Southern States’ original governments against their consent and formed a new state/nation/body politic composed of “14th Amendment U.S. Citizens” 15 STAT 73 (June 25, 1868) says , "WHEREAS the people of North Carolina, South Carolina, Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida have, in pursuance of the provisions of an act entitled `An act for the more efficient government of the rebel States,' passed March 2nd, eighteen hundred and sixty-seven, and the acts supplementary thereto [see note 4, post], framed constitutions of State government which are republican, and have adopted said constitutions by large majorities of the votes [363 U.S. 121, 136] cast at the elections held for the ratification or rejection of the same: Therefore, "Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That each of the States of North Carolina, South Carolina, Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama, and Florida, shall be entitled and admitted to representation in Congress as a State of the Union when the legislature of such State shall have duly ratified the amendment to the Constitution of the United States proposed by the Thirty-ninth Congress, and known as Article fourteen upon the following fundamental conditions . . .” De facto government. One that maintains itself by a display of force against the will of the rightful legal government and is successful, at least temporarily, in overturning the institutions of the rightful legal government by setting up its own in lieu thereof. Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 504. Wortham v. Walker, 133 Tex. 255, 128 S.W.2d 1138, 1145 As a result, NEW DEFACTO STATES were formed, because new constitutions and new legislatures were formed via the 14th amendment: Coleman v. Miller, 507 U. S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972 says ,“The legislatures of Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina had rejected the amendment in November and December, 1866. New governments were erected in those States (and in others) under the direction of Congress. The new legislatures ratified the amendment, that of North Carolina on July 4, 1868, that of South Carolina on July 9, 1868, and that of Georgia on July 21, 1868." The object of the Civil from 1861 to 1865 was not for the Southern States to be conquered or subjugated, and was not intended to impair the rights of the states: The House Journal - July 22, 1861. p.123 / Senate Journal - July 25, 1861.p.92 both read, “Mr. Crittenden submitted the following resolution, viz: . . .that this war is not waged on their part in any spirit of oppression, or for any purpose of conquest or subjugation, or purpose of overthrowing or interfering with the rights or established institutions of those States, but to defend and maintain the supremacy of the Constitution, and to preserve the Union with all the dignity, equality, and rights of the several States unimpaired; and that as soon as these objects are accomplished the war ought to cease.” The 14th Amendment created a dual nationality status in which Federal Citizenship status was conjoined with an inseperable State “resident/citizen” status. This formed a new body politic which impaired the original body politic of those who possessed the singular state national and [citizen] status by disenfranchising them from voting. (see notes in III) III. Dejure vs. Defacto Status 1. Federal Citizenship Versus State Citizenship a. The term “citizen of the United States” never referred to a unified National form of citizenship, but that of a singular “state” citizenship status until the passage of the 14th Amendment. “ The slaves recently emancipated by proclamation, and subsequently by Constitutional Amendment, have no civil status. They should be made citizens. We do not, by making them citizens, make them voters,—we do not, in this Constitutional Amendment, attempt to force them upon Southern white men as equals at the ballot-box; but we do intend that they shall be admitted to citizenship, that they shall have the protection of the laws, that they shall not, any more than the rebels shall, be deprived of life, of liberty, of property, without due process of law, and that “they shall not be denied the equal protection of the law.” And in making this extension of citizenship, we are not confining the breadth and scope of our efforts to the negro. It is for the white man as well. We intend to make citizenship National. Heretofore, a man has been a citizen of the United States because he was a citizen of some-one of the States: now, we propose to reverse that, and make him a citizen of any State where he chooses to reside, by defining in advance his National citizenship—and our Amendment declares that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside.” This Amendment will prove a great beneficence to this generation, and to all who shall succeed us in the rights of American citizenship; and we ask the people of the revolted States to consent to this condition as an antecedent step to their re-admission to Congress with Senators and Representatives.” POLITICAL DISCUSSIONS LEGISLATIVE, DIPLOMATIC, AND POPULAR 1856-1886 § 61. The Reconstruction Problem- JAMES G. BLAINE. NORWICH, CONN. THE HENRY BILL PUBLISHING COMPANY 1887 b. Before the passage of Amend. XIV the United States, for citizenship and nationality purposes, was considered to be a plural collective of separate nations. 1. 2 STAT 153 , An act to establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and to repeal the acts heretofore passéd on that subject, says “Be it enacted, &c, That any alien, being a free white person, may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States, or any of them…” 2. Amendment XIII. §1. says “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” c. After the passage of Amend. XIV the United States, for citizenship and nationality purposes, was considered to be a singular entity. 1. 8 USC § 1483 (a) says , “Except as provided in paragraphs (6) and (7) of §1481 (a) of this title, no national of the United States can lose United States nationality under this chapter while within the United States or any of its outlying possessions” d. The language in the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (14 Stat. 27) set the premise for this aforementioned unified National Citizenship as decreed in Amend. XIV. 1. CONGRESS'S POWER TO ENFORCE AMEND. XIV RIGHTS: LESSONS FROM FEDERAL REMEDIES THE FRAMERS ENACTED by Robert J. Kaczorowski Copyright © 2005 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College Harvard Journal on Legislation (JOL) - Volume 42, Number 1, Winter 2005 says that : “Because the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 are central to the meaning and scope of the Amend. XIV , it is necessary to examine the statute's provisions. In brief, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 conferred U.S. citizenship on all Americans” e. There is evidence that the several Union states had power to confer their respective state citizenship before & around the time of the Civil Rights Act and the “citizen of the United States” status written in the Civil Rights Act was only a unified Federal citizenship. 1. March 27, 1866 - Johnson’s Veto of the Civil Rights Act - Senate Journal, p.279: says that, “By the first section of the bill ; ‘all persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are declared to be citizens of the United States’. It does not purport to declare or confer any other right of citizenship than federal citizenship. It does not purport to give these classes of persons any status as citizens of States, except that which may result from their status as citizens of the United States. The power to confer the right of State citizenship is just as exclusively with the several States as the power to confer the right of federal citizenship is with Congress.” 2. Ex Parte Knowles 5 Cal. 300 (1855) "A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing. To conceive a citizen of the United States who is not a citizen of some one of the States, is totally foreign to the idea, and inconsistent with the proper construction and common understanding of the expression as use in the Constitution, which must be deduced from its various other provisions. The object then to be obtained, by the exercise of the power of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective States” 3. Sharon v. Hill, (1885) 26 F 337, 343."Prior to the adoption of this amendment, strictly speaking, there were no citizens of the United States, but only some one of them. Congress had the power "to establish an uniform rule of naturalization," but not the power to make a naturalized alien a citizen of any state. But the states generally provided that such persons might, on sufficient residence therein, become citizens thereof, and then the courts held, ab convenienti, rather than otherwise, that they became ipso facto citizens of the United States”.
If you are living in the United States and NOT declared to be a state national or State Citizen and one of the people belonging to our nation-states, you are "ipsofacto" presumed to be a citizen of the United States, and, under the 14th Amendment, "citizens of the United States" are criminals and slaves by definition.
Now, this entire "set up" is conceived in fraud and is in violation of the Constitutions, but we have to individually and as an entire people, address this situation, expose it, and finish the Reconstruction before this Mess is put to bed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)