Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.


Friday, April 24, 2020

BREAKING! This ER Doctor Just NUKED Fauci's Pandemic Fraud Straight to Hell!

Found Here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BTLii-e_UtY/

Buying and Selling What Isn't Theirs


By Anna Von Reitz

I have been asked to review several new monetary systems over the past few weeks.  The fundamental flaws are quick to sum up: 

(1) Transfer systems --- the "pipelines" that allow interbank transfers for money are still under the control of who-knows-who, most likely Rockefellers or organizations controlled by Rockefellers like DHS, the current "stop-go", which regularly abuses its position to do everything from confiscate assets that don't belong to the Perps to blocking financial transactions that they have no plausible reason to block, or only self-interested reasons to block.  

So there is Flaw Number One --- no open-source control of the bank transfer system and no Public Oversight of the Bank Transfer System, either.  

If they can keep you from transferring your money or can intercept your money and shunt it into other accounts than you intend or can stop your money altogether and hold it for months and then, after making interest on it, return it to your account --- what else can they do with it?  Bail in.  Bail out.  Confiscate.  And on and on and on.  

The transparency and reliability and fairness of the Bank Transfer System is something that affects us all and which affects all aspects of international trade.  If you leave crooks in charge of it, all the present problems plaguing this function remain. All the proposals I have seen have been notably silent on who runs the bank transfer system and what kind of oversight applies to them.

Next, all these proposals come with solemn promises that remind me of the "Good Faith and Credit of Congress".  We are assured that, for example, no currency will be created unless it's asset backed.  We aren't told "exactly" what assets it will be backed with, and we aren't told who will be making sure that no currency is created without appropriate backing, and we aren't told who will be supervising and providing oversight to make sure that the currency generation process is clean and sane.  In short, there's really nothing in any of these plans to keep the same thing from happening over again.  We are told to "just trust them" --- again, which is clearly not an option. 

Third, strangely enough, though this should be obvious, all these proposed "asset-backed" currencies are still represented as "notes" --- as in Promissory Notes.  Hello?  I'm sorry, but asset-backed money is either: (1) a certificate of ownership tied to an actual commodity, or (2) actual money with the commodity integrated into the money itself.  There's no sense or reason on Earth for any asset-backed money to be processed as a "debt note", unless of course, the value of the "asset" backing the money has already been stolen or sold to other parties unknown.  

The sum total impression of these discussions is that nobody knows what they are doing, or if they do know what they are doing, they are tremendously crooked and think that the rest of us are equally stupid.  Maybe we deserve that, as we let them get away with so much for so long.  

As I keep explaining to the jaw-dropped purveyors --- there's a difference between dealing with a bear that is hibernating and a bear that is fully awake. 

And when you step back from all of this and just look at it --- what do you see? 

Men who are buying and selling and trading what isn't theirs to start with, men controlling the assets and labor of others, which they have no right to do, men who have manipulated everything --- every commodity and delivery system you can think of --- for so long, that they just assume that that is their right and role in the world.
It doesn't enter their heads that you and the actual government might have something else in mind, new business standards, new institutions, new ways of transferring money, new means of accounting, new means of oversight, or even other organizations in mind for the jobs.   

----------------------------

See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.  

Others are saying the same things Anna is. They don't quite get at the cause but the outcome will be the same. Here is one example from Mike Maloney of GoldSilver.com

Dear President Trump and State of State Governors


By Anna Von Reitz

Dear President Trump and State of State Governors,

It’s apparent you all need help.  And not from more charlatans. 

This is very simple. 

We have five (5) different technologies for broad spectrum removal of all Corona Viruses— and all other SARS viruses, too. 

And they all work and are proven to work. 

We can cure one individual, a houseful, a town, a city, a county, an entire state— even the entire planet. 

Our technology is completely scale-able, non-invasive, does not pollute, does not involve vaccines. 

And it’s cheap. 

What’s not to like about this? 

Our General Accord Contract is three pages long. 

It allows us to help you and all the people who are depending on you. 

Ask and you receive.  

Don’t ask.....and you get to give press conferences forever? 

Wednesday, April 22, 2020

I Want to Vomit All Over the Smoking Gun


By Anna Von Reitz

My cats have often astounded me with their forthright reactions to things. If they really, really don't like a visitor to my house, they will pee on him or her and help assure a prompt removal of the Offender.  If they encounter something truly objectionable in the shared environment, they will reliably vomit on it, thus drawing my (unavoidable) attention to the pertinent issues.

I've had to apologize--vaguely--- for "losing" contract proposals as a result of their un-politically correct demise at the paws and jaws of certain felines. Invariably, when the cat vomit has been scraped off, I have discovered that the immediately underlying contract language of the offer was deceitful. 

Though crude, the Cat Method of communicating when something or someone is dreadfully wrong, is effective and attention-provoking -- a regular silent fire alarm. I wish to provoke a somewhat similar attention-getting response with my headline today, with similar urgency.

On March 26, 2020, Microsoft applied for an International Patent with WIPO -- a patent for a body-interfaced cryptocurrency, using an implanted microchip connected to a cloud computer system, which also just happens to collect "biometric data" --- your DNA sequence, blood, electrical synapse activity, etc., etc., etc.  The WIPO Patent Application Number just happens to be: 060606.

So.  Bill Gates has aimed at nothing less than total invasion of your biological privacy and control of your ability to buy, sell, or trade anything.

Smoking gun, anyone?

Bill Gates is an international criminal who has purposefully misused and abused and misdirected the resources of Microsoft, Incorporated, to promote criminal control and surveillance objectives.  He needs to be arrested without further delay and brought to trial for crimes against humanity already committed.

Bill Gate's evil and invasive control system agenda which is apparently still being pursued by Microsoft, needs to be permanently derailed---if necessary, via liquidation of Microsoft and WIPO as crimes syndicates engaged in promoting illegal surveillance and control systems, and the protection of profit from these repugnant activities via the issuance of criminal patents.

It's not just the "National Security" of every national government on Earth that is at stake here, it's your right to your own life, to your bodily privacy, to your "common right" to buy, sell, and trade without any corporate eye in the sky being involved.

It's time to smash Microsoft into the dirt for this, along with all the executives, engineers, "future planners" and attorneys that had a hand in this. 

Let's also give a big Hairball Award to The Council on Foreign Relations--- the leadership of which also needs to be arrested for promotion of illegal and repugnant population control and eugenics agendas-- for their latest propaganda in their publication "Foreign Affairs" attempting to gin up a jihad against China for criminal activities that they have themselves been promoting. 

The Pot does too often call the Kettle black.  

They chose China as the point source to start their corona virus crappola, thinking that that would be sufficient to blackmail China and grease the wheels to blame China for the whole 5G "pandemic" debacle --- but it is backfiring on them.

More and more pieces of the puzzle come in and get put in place:

George Soros funding the lab in Wuhan.

Anthony Fauci funding it and providing the biological feedstocks for it.

Bill Gates investing in the virus strains and vaccine manufacturing and microchip technology. 

All of it.  All of them.  The whole "picture".

One does not have to be a cat to experience rising gorge when confronted with such obvious malicious, self-interested, inhumane, profit-motivated behavior.

And one does not need a ten hour tutorial to understand what these men intended for humanity, or need to ponder a great deal over which institutions and organizations have assisted and promoted their anti-human and anti-human rights agenda.

May what they wished for all of us, be returned to all of them.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Regarding the Use of Fire


By Anna Von Reitz


It has been suggested that we use fire to purify the sites where the Satanists have polluted the Earth with blood sacrifices. I do not recommend this option, as it has not proven effective in the past. See my explanation:

No — beginning thousands of years ago in the Mideast [we tried using fire to "burn out" the pollution]. We tried burning them out but the energetic imprint and the curse of the blood remained, so we buried their cities and their ruins as much as possible, because this silenced the evil.

Gobleki Tepi is an example of burying the sites and sealing up the evil using earth. We discovered that even a partial burying is quite effective— see what was done in Russia during the Napoleonic Era.

We tried burying them in water. All the sunken cities are examples. It is more or less effective. [But it does more or less pollute the sea water on a long term basis.]

Both these methods and destruction by fire are absolute. The cities and buildings are destroyed. Nobody can live in them. All the work people put into building them is lost.

And the problem has, despite all this destruction, remained. It goes dormant as long as it is suppressed and guarded against, but it comes back, just like an infection cycle of the flu.

That’s why so many military [men and women] and politicians have called it a “virus”.

This cycle — these outbreaks of Satanism have gone on for thousands of years now, and always with the same results.

Like an infection or a parasite, it moves from place to place, host population to host population.
When things got too hot for it in the Mideast, it moved to Turkey and Greece and North Africa.

From its base in Carthage, it infected Rome even though Rome razed Carthage and killed them to the man.

From Rome it infected the entire world.

So even while Rome stood against it for centuries and suppressed it, this evil was gaining ground with the superstitious sailors and common folk and eating away like acid at Rome’s foundations.

The “infection” of this “religion” and it’s drug-and-sex based “sacraments” then traveled to Cornwall, Wales and Ireland, the coast of Normandy was infected with it, too.

The struggle against it in the Dark Ages has come down to us as the story of Camelot— most people don’t realize that Arthur and Lancelot and the others all started out as Satanists who converted to Christianity. Their struggle as first generation Christians is apparent once you become aware of it— Arthur’s incest to produce an heir— is textbook Satanism creeping back in.

The Egyptian strain of this “virus” has proven exceptionally long-lived and enjoyed a big resurgence after the tomb excavations early last century and the Golden Dawn revival of it led by pedophile and abuser Aleister Crowley.

His granddaughters became the High Priestesses in the 1950’s- 60’s with otherwise sane industrialists and aristocrats spending millions of dollars to have sex with these women to secure “forgiveness of their sins” in a modern resurrection of temple prostitution.

“Sin” in their system equates with monetary debts.

Idolatry in the form of worshiping money is part of their “religion” and the most potent means they have to infect and control a population. Once they get one of their men in control politically as they did here with Theodore Roosevelt, Wilson, FDR, LBJ, Nixon, and GHWB and GW—- they use the money system to further infiltrate and gain power.

Teddy Roosevelt set up massive commodity rigging schemes. Wilson sold out means of producing our currency— a fundamental commodity- to the European banisters. FDR bankrupted the mercantile banks and enslaved all the Municipal citizenry, which he and his followers have tried to parley into enslavement of all Americans. LBJ set up both the welfare state and the Federal kickback schemes and the basis of the “Petrodollar” and also gave the young Henry Kissinger his start. 

Nixon finished the job to enact the “Petrodolar” and deregulated the medical industry converting it from a beneficial non-profit sector to a parasitic for-profit free-for-all. The Bushes promoted and ensured the success of all the prior work and vastly expanded the use of “sacramental” drugs and human trafficking for the sexual perversions involved in their theocracy, which they ran as a “shadow government” in tandem with ours. 

In this, they were following the Satanist's Standard Playbook --- use what is good as a storefront for what is evil --- our government as a cover for theirs, the Catholic Church as a cover for their religion, the United Nations organization as a cover for their multi-national interlocking trust directorate. The Bushes pulled all sorts of shady deals with the bond market and created the "derivative" market, which allowed them to sell and resell the "same piece of ground" --- or whatever other asset, multiple times to multiple buyers. This giant swindle was used to fund war-making and drug-running all over the planet. Later acolytes, like George Soros, who bought Disney and converted it into a subliminal marketing tool promoting sex, death, and drugs, and Bill Gates with his embedded surveillance software and vaccine investments, have gnawed away at the blood and bone of our sanity and our governments throughout the world.

People realizing this for the first time think that this is something new, but it's not. It's ancient. And it always follows the same patterns and has the same results -- the parasite destroys the host to the extent possible and moves on. Only this time, they have aimed at parasitizing and destroying the entire planet, which has obligated them to form extraterrestrial treaties and siphon off unimaginable amounts of money to build space stations and space cities and transport systems for themselves, as they propose to live off-planet in luxury and manipulate everything here from the safety of their "home in heaven".

Many people around the world witnessed the "disappearing Pope" --- he turned away from the doorway he was standing in and "blip!" with what appeared to be his back in full view, he vanished. How do you suppose that is? We were seeing an advanced hologram of the Pope, not the man himself.

All of this is in violation of the G2O2-P3 Treaty we keep referring to, and also against Universal Law.

As a result, additional assistance has been called in to put an end to the progression of this timeline and bring the criminals to justice. We, at our current state of development, cannot deal with these "people" --- I use the word lightly --- or their technology or their allies. Thankfully, all we have to deal with are the physically present and incarnate husks of the parasites. The rest is being cleaned up for us.

Getting back to your original question --- how to deal with the buildings and the stain on the land and soil which these parasites leave behind each time they are caught and suppressed? Earth works, but not even that is forever; Water works, but is damaged itself in the process; Fire only converts it into another form of itself; Air forms around it, but doesn't provide a substantial enough barrier in a three-dimensional world. There remains the restoring and resurrecting power of Spirit, which has proven to be the best means of overwhelming and destroying this parasite.

If you have been following along for some time, you witnessed the directed meditations I organized to destroy both the Bardsey Island and Great Palatine Seals. These things exist in the realm of energetic templates that form the basis of our perceptual reality. They act like dams in a river to create reservoirs of energy that these evil-doers block up and use for their own purposes--- and thereby deprive the "downstream" users that would otherwise receive the benefit, and gum up the natural flow of energy that ensures planetary health. Britain and Rome deliberately blocked the flow of energy to Africa, and then tried to excuse their action by demeaning their victims and promoting racial prejudice.

With our normal eyes we can't see these "seals", but we have developed external technologies that are capable of locating and discerning these "energetic anomalies". They are not really "energetic anomalies" --- a description that might lead people to think that these "anomalies" have occurred naturally, when in fact they are caused by purposeful manipulation of the electromagnetic field of the Earth.

Now, when I refer to the restorative powers of Spirit -- the Fifth Element -- I am directing your attention to the conduit of rarefied energy that is contained within the interface we have with All That Is, the Primal Creator. Each one of us, each animal, each tree, plant, and rock, is connected to the Creator of all this. Together, we make up one living organism, subject to one Universal Law that includes all the Natural Laws we are aware of and a great many we have yet to perceive. As I live and breathe and walk upon the Earth, I have already been resurrected-- not by cloning or any such clumsy attempts of technology -- but by the hand of The Living God.

In a sense then, both I and my cohorts are all "already dead", which is why -- after a few futile attempts to kill me, the Bloodline Families have recognized their position and backed off. The same Power of the Spirit that lifts up my image from the dust is more than capable of restoring the Earth, cleansing the buildings tainted by these parasites, and removing them and their influence on a permanent basis. An appeal to that option is what I recommend as we face the "mop up" --- just forego any terraforming or flooding or incendiary options, none of which have worked all that well in the past --- and instead teach people how to invoke the Power of the Spirit of The Living God to accomplish all these things we need.

This Power can do in an afternoon what would require endless ages of our puny efforts, and do it all perfectly.

So no point in half-answers and taking recourse to fires and floods and bulldozers; this has been a spiritual war from the first, and requires a spiritual answer in the last.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

Danielle DiMartino Booth of Quill Intelligence with Patrick Bet-David of Valuetainment

If you listen very closely you will find many things Anna has said over the last few years and months that are confirmed by what this lady says, and you will also find some disagreement which you would expect from someone who never reads Anna's articles, and who is a banking insider.

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

How to Say No


By Anna Von Reitz

"No" is one of the first words we all learn, but ironically, many of us never really learn how to use it.

We are co-opted in this by school indoctrination, by familial enforcement, and by social convention.  We are literally taught not to say no.

The underlying subconscious meaning of this rigorous training comes down to the message: "its bad to say no" and in too many cases where children are disrespected and abused it can also mean ---"you have no right to say no."

So we get the message early and often that it is wrong for us to say no, even though our parents do it often and with emphasis, and as children, we also get the message that we have no right to do so in the face of parents and teacher and other "authority figures".

No wonder that so many adults are conflicted and even somewhat confused by the simple word, "No."

Consider this your remedial training course.

No is a supremely good and necessary word. It is the counterbalance of "yes" and it is a useful, moral, and in its way, very positive word, too. 

What if you are saying no to being disrespected and abused by your own public employees?  Well, then, "no" becomes a positive word. 

In such a situation, "no" stands in back of right action [Why should you be bossed around by your employees?] and right thinking [Since when do employees tell their employers what to do, or how to do it?] and right ordering of the world [If employees direct employers, the world is upside down and on its head---and we all know that and the effects of it every day.]

One of the glorious things about Donald Trump is that he learned to say no.

He learned to put his foot down hard. 

And as much admiration as I hear for Donald Trump and as much damnation I hear spread about him, hardly anyone realizes that it all stems from his ability and willingness to say --- no.

He knows how to walk away, and that's something that hardly anyone is taught anymore.  Perhaps he lucked out and had parents who were aware of the "yes-man" mentality and bucked against it.  Maybe he arrived at a point in his life where he just got his back up, said no, meant it, and liked the results.

We may never know, but anyone can observe the results.

People all over this continent and around the globe admire Donald Trump for saying no to evil and bad deals so often and so decisively.  The odd part, is that it never occurs to so many of them that they can and should be doing the same thing, and by all means available.

These people who cheer on Donald Trump on, but don't emulate his action, can look outside their subtle prison bars and admire those who say no, but somewhere there is still a cowed child sitting there, being told, "You can't say no."---- "You are not old enough to say no." or "You're not good enough to say no." or "You don't have the right to say no."

And on the other end of the spectrum we have people who hate Donald Trump and can't even rationally say why.  These are most often Leftists. They almost subconsciously fear authority figures and people who say no, because to them, no is always negative, scandalous, politically incorrect. 

You can almost see them curling up into their fetal positions, thinking: he's going to say no, he's going to nix what we want, he's not going to give us what we need, he's bad because he says no, he isn't nice because he says no, doesn't he realize that its immoral and bad and "socially unacceptable" to say no?

Boy, they say, collectively and silently with a hint of desperation -- we were all taught that as kids!

That's what Leftist indoctrination does.  It disrespects and cows children to the point where simply saying "no" is a radical act, and where the emotional detritus of early abuse remains, ready to explode against authority figures of all kinds.

And now here we are, grown adults, called to examine where we stand on the issue of "no". 

Does the word "no" conjure up feelings of resistance and foreboding? Does it make us pause and hesitate to use it?  Or are we comfortable with saying no, and secure in our authority to use it in a measured and sensible way?

In recent days many people have contacted me about precisely this issue. They are worried about forced vaccinations, forced removals from their homes, force of all kinds being applied from all angles.  How, they plead, can we say no? 

Well, you first get into position where you can say it. 

Our erstwhile Public Employees have gerrymandered things around to the point where you are being mistaken for one of them.  They think that, as one of them, you are subject to the same codes, rules, regulations, statutes, and limitations that they have to embrace. 

If the President of their corporation says "March!" they have to march and not think too much about it, because they are: (1) employees -- paid; (2) employees-- volunteer; (3) dependents -- voluntary, aka. on welfare; (4) dependents -- involuntary, aka, wards of the "state", whichever "state" that may be.

So if you want to say "no" to your employees, you first have to disabuse them of this "presumption" on their parts, that you are one of them, and subject to their corporate "laws" which are in fact rules, codes, regulations, statutes, limitations, and policies.

And you'd better have evidence of the fact, too, because otherwise they just think you are some "wise acre" or bad sport or insubordinate trying to pull something damaging to their food source, their "governmental services corporation". 

They have a tendency to react rather badly to that idea, and generally misunderstand who is who and what is what in situations where their "authority" is challenged.

Nonetheless, it is necessary for millions of us to become informed about our own authority, and to also steel ourselves to the challenges and requirements of assuming authority and saying --- no, as adults. 

No, I am not letting my employees force any kind of vaccination, ear-tagging, or other invasive medical technology on me or my family.

No, I am not paying any taxes that I don't actually owe. 

No, I am not paying off any mortgages owed the State of Nevada organization.

No, I am not registering my private automobile as a "motor vehicle" when I am not using it as a motor vehicle.

No, I am not subjecting my children to any medical procedure or medication that has not been tested and proven to be safe.

No, I am not going to stand here and be sprayed with industrial wastes anymore.

No, I am not having more industrial wastes (Fluoride) added to my water and toothpaste anymore.

No, I am not going to eat food that has been genetically engineered to produce its own internal insecticides, fungicides, and herbicides.

No, I am not going to be drafted and conscripted to serve as a cheap mercenary in foreign wars for profit.

No, I am not going to be abused in any way at all anymore by my public employees. 

Period.

The first step in your Remedial "Just Say No" Plan, is to restore your birthright political status and record it over their False Registration, so it a matter of public record and Notice that you are not acting in the capacity of (1-4) above.

You do this by contacting your State Assembly at: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net.

There you will encounter like-minded people who have already taken the steps to reclaim and restore their birthright political status as Americans and people of their State of the Union.  They will happily help you do the same, and then, you, too, will have the unabrogated right to say no, no, no, and no.

Having thus secured your right to say no and having made it public knowledge, your next task is to assist your State Assembly, that same group of determined and knowledgeable people who kept the door open and welcomed you "home". 

Support them and their work with might and main, because they are there supporting you and your government and your right to say "no" to your own employees. 

Your next assignment is to practice saying no. 

Stand in front of a mirror if necessary, smile, speak calmly and logically and say, "Officer, I am not a public employee or dependent of any kind. The only contract I have with you and the organizations you represent is the Federal Constitution. Please look at Article IV and explain to me where you have any authority to arrest me, attack my person, or trespass upon my private property?" 

Offer him a copy of Article IV. 

"And, also, look here --- Article VI."

This is where it says that no other "law" or "thing" (thing means corporation, flag, idol, etc.) stands against the Constitution.

It's best to have both Constitutions handy, both the Territorial version, The Constitution of the United States of America, and the Municipal version (for Municipal police and Federal Civil Service "Agents) which is simply The Constitution for the United States --- no "of America". 

Now, Officer, you can see for yourself that no corporate rule-making, statute, legislation, code or regulation applies to me, and that any obligation you have to these orders is secondary to the obligation you owe to me--- my constitutional guarantees.

This is a learning process, not only about "How to say no." but about who you are and who your employees are, and what your proper relationships are. You have to know that yourself and you have to teach them.

There is a very helpful little website called www.GovernPublicServants.com that provides not only excellent information and sources, but take you through the role-playing practice involved.  If you are feeling a bit unsteady on your feet and want to see someone else actually do this, go there and watch.

You can say no without being obnoxious, after all.

You can afford to be patient and teach someone else things that you didn't know yourself before you "woke up". 

But most of all, stand there in front of that mirror, look yourself in the eye, think of all those things that the "government" threatens you with and burdens you with, and say, "No."  Say it again, "No."  And again, "No."

You must learn to say no and say it with authority. 

A useful blurb has been circulating around about "How to Refuse Vaccination".  This is a special case of saying no and presumes that a doctor or nurse with a needle or worse, needle gun, ready to plunge and FRID ear-tag and an unknown slurry of unproven "vaccine" into your arm.

It uses the military medical term "iatrogenic" --- as in, "Doctor, has this vaccine been proven to have no iatrogenic effects?" 

Iatrogenic is a fancy way of saying -- diseases and maladies that result from medical procedures, like vaccination, like blood transfusions, like intubation, like most of what they like to do to you in hospitals.

If the hovering medical professional can't say yes with a straight face, you then hold the doctor responsible to his Hippocratic Oath, and politely decline vaccination.

His or her Hippocratic Oath binds doctors to "Do no harm."

To avoid this and speed delivery of their highly suspect cocktail of crap into your bloodstream, they may attempt to use nurses or foreign medical personnel.  But it is all the same routine.

No matter how they yell and scream and require their own employees and dependents to do this and that, they have no such authority related to you and your body and your willingness to participate in their experiments--- as long as you have declared and recorded your birthright political status, and politely declined their "offer", they become hugely liable for any damage they do to you. 

Your government, that is, your actual government --- not the foreign subcontractors operating as "governmental services corporations" has valued you at a trillion dollars per head --- that is, we have set a prohibitively large liability fine against any foreign government or agent of a foreign government that kills or maims (permanently damages) any American.

This makes it increasingly unlikely that those foreign governments will test their luck with their "vaccination" agenda against those who declare their birthright political status.  Instead of making billions with their phony unproven vaccines, they will be losing trillions, instead.

And since money and abuse of power, not health, is what this is all about, telling them "no" in as many ways as possible, is important. Discouraging their criminal profit-seeking in as many ways as possible, is important.

Because if you don't say no to people like Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci, if you don't put your little flat feet down and make it count and explain it to your employees in terms they have to understand--- like that whack-job "Governor" in Michigan--- they will presume upon you and treat you worse than cattle.

In their infantile lust for control and their greed, they will ruin your lives. People like this don't deserve to be among us, but they are. If you let them define you and tell you what to do, they will do so to suit themselves and for their profit and for their empowerment, not yours.  They have no morals or sense of humility, no respect for life or for the sacredness or integrity of other souls. 

To them, you are lab rats.  Expendables.  In fact, as they have often said, your population needs to decrease. So it's fine with them if millions of you die as a result of their experiments: fewer Priority Creditors that they owe money to, more secret life insurance payments they can claim, and profit from selling the vaccines that kill, maim, sterilize, and ear-tag "the herd" of course.  

May we suggest that any "population decrease" needs to begin with them?

----------------------------

See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

About Their Attempts to Form a "Government"


By Anna Von Reitz

As you can pick up from reading between the lines, there are a lot of desperate attempts being made to preserve the established world order, at least to the extent of hauling essential chestnuts out of the fire.

Some of you are rightly concerned because you see all sorts of foreign and domestic corporations operating under different names, "offering" to step in and replace the bankrupt governmental services corporations and their banks and other "institutional artifices" with their own.

However, that isn't possible. The States of America have to be rebuilt -- "reconstructed" and they can only be reconstructed by the States. States give rise to States of States. They can't arise like mushrooms overnight, all by themselves, despite what corporations operating "as" States of States might think.

I understand Mr. Trump's dilemma, but the fact is that our unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America is the source of all Delegations of Power, and when the Federal Subcontractors-- however they are organized or named, fail due to incompetence, such as bankruptcy, all the Delegated Powers return to us by Operation of Law.

Those Powers don't just hang around in the ethersphere waiting for some new Tom, Dick or Harry governmental services corporation to form. They have to form a viable corporation, if they wish to operate as corporations, and they have to come to us as the Source, and receive our agreement for them to act as Successors to the Constitutional Agreements.

Otherwise, they have no "powers" delegated to them, no contract or authority in evidence. It all slides right back into our laps and we get to tell them what to do, if they want to continue their jobs. Which is what we have been doing for many months with mixed results.

We've already seen Crown Colony of the United States and Unity States of America and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. and United States of North America come and go, and nobody seems to "get it" when we say that they "can't get there from here".

Because they worked this sleight of hand and got away with it in the past, they think they can just continue on in the same vein, spin another round, and continue to skate on our ticket.

However, we have raised our hands and the wheels are in motion that prevent them from just booting up another corporation somewhere, calling it by some deceptively similar name, and taking over operations here.

We have our own government and that government has been successfully called into Session. It's the difference between dealing with a hibernating bear and a bear that is fully awake.

No new governmental services corporation, foreign or domestic, may "assume" any service contract of any kind with us without our explicit consent. Mr. Trump, individually and personally, has a contract. Nobody else does, so they had better keep him alive and well and smiling.

His contract is limited by the standing Constitutional agreements, but he doesn't object to that.
That said, he and the Generals advising him don't appear to fully understand why they can't just boot up another commercial corporation, inherit the farm, and continue on.

To put it simply, the Landlords have come home. The actual Inheritors are here. Our employees and foreign subcontractors can no longer assume control and propose to represent us or inherit any contract to do so absent our consent.

Imagine it this way --- you hire a housekeeping service, and you empower them to do certain things for you. They can have a key to the house, for example. They are authorized to buy cleaning supplies "on ticket".

But their bosses are dishonest and incompetent, and so, the company providing the housekeeping services eventually goes bankrupt despite being very well-paid and despite stealing as much as they can from their employer.

The same bosses think, oh, well, we jettisoned that debt and discharged everything we owed our employers. Guess we will just boot up a new corporation, call it by some deceptively similar name, assume that our old contract is still ours and what ho, carry on.

They actually got away with that in the past while we were asleep, so they don't understand why they can't just do it again now.

The reason is--- we've objected, officially, and now, they have to deal directly with us and "re-up" under our terms and conditions, or stand down.

That goes for all the various entities trying to claim contracts or rights related in any way to The United States and The United States of America.

This has yet to be resolved, along with the hash they have made of the commercial credit and banking system.

Stand by.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.

An Object Lesson Regarding "Law" and "Order"


By Anna Von Reitz

Yesterday, I explained the difference between "Law" and "Order", and people discovered --- for perhaps the first time --- that these are two different things. Law may be natural, God-ordained, or man-made, but Order refers to the rules, codes, regulations and statutes imposed by incorporated entities for the purposes of their internal functions and for the discipline of their officers, employees, volunteers, and dependents.

Today, one of my friends sent me this excellent summation of the limits of executive powers -- so long as we adopt and stand in our proper capacity, and are not employees, volunteers, or dependents of the federal entities or their "state of state" franchises operating as governmental services corporations.

Americans cannot take their exemption from corporate "Order" for granted, because our Federal Subcontractors have engaged in a long-term and secretive fraud against us, which results in false claims and registrations to the effect that we are federal employees, volunteers, dependents or franchisees.

All these lies told about us and all these false evidences accumulated against us serve to evade the obligations of these "governmental service corporations" owed to us under the actual Public Law and under the Constitutions.

If we don't rebut these "presumptions" and record our Declaration of our birthright political status, these False Registrations serve to subject us to the foreign, private, corporate "laws" know as codes, regulations, and statutes. And also to the Executive Orders of the "President" of these corporations doing business "in our names".

That said, I want you to read and deeply consider the information below that applies to all Americans who reclaim and declare their birthright political status. I think that this adequately demonstrates why declaring your birthright political status and securing the protections of the Constitutions is vitally important.

Please--- for your own sakes and the sake of your country, don't wait a moment longer to "secure these blessings" and declare your freedom from private corporate executive power. Read on and see what you are missing until you do declare and record your political status.

I quote the material received from my friend for convenience, though I have often cited these same facts and sources. Take a moment to consider how important these protections are in the face of claims of "martial law" and other arbitrary actions related to their claims of a pandemic--- and remember: none of these protections apply to you or your business until you declare and record your birthright political status!
.........
"Neither Presidents nor Governors Have Authority to Issue and Enforce General Mandates that Negate the Constitutionally-Protected Rights of We, the People and our Private Businesses

(emboldening, enlargement, underlining in following authority sites added)
[These quotes are from] a ruling of the United States Supreme Court shortly after the "Civil War" in Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866) which yet stands to this day:

"The Constitution for the United States is a law for rulers and people equally in war and in peace at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine was ever invented than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the exigencies [emergencies/urgencies] of government." pp. 120-121
….there is no law for the government of the citizens, the armies or the navy of the United States, 
within American jurisdiction, which is not contained in or derived from the Constitution.� p. 141
 [This underlines my oft-repeated reminder, that with respect to both the Municipal and Territorial governments and their employees and contractors --- we have one (1) and only one (1) contract each with these entities. The Territorial contract is The Constitution of the United States of America. The Municipal contract is The Constitution of the United States. And that's it. There is no other "law" or contract between us and them, so any time they are talking about codes, rules, regulations, statutes, etc.-- they are "presuming" that you are one of them and are subject to their foreign, private, corporate "laws". ]

In 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, a legal encyclopedia of United States law, suspension of the Constitution is prohibited, as follows:

It is sometimes argued that the existence of an emergency allows the existence and operation of powers, national or state, which violate the inhibitions of the Federal Constitution. The rule is quite otherwise. NO emergency justifies the violation of any of the provisions of the United States Constitution." Section 71

"...Neither the legislature nor any executive or judicial officer may disregard the provisions of the Constitution in case of an emergency" -- Section 98

All public officials swear a lawfully binding oath to not only their state constitution but also the U.S. Constitution and laws "in pursuance thereof" (or, in conformity with). ANY public official who declares the suspension of constitutionally guaranteed rights (to freely travel, peaceably assemble, earn a living, freely worship, acquire goods, etc.) and/or attempts to enforce such suspension within the 50 independent, sovereign, continental United states of America is making war against our constitution(s) and, therefore, we, the people. Whenever they exceed the limits of the Constitution, they perjure their oaths and, thus, vacate their offices and must be held accountable. Their mandates may be disregarded with impunity. If, and when, our public servants wish to enact and enforce any unconstitutional, non-constitutional, and/or extra-constitutional laws and executive mandates, they must do so through the intentionally long and arduous Amendment Procedure.

A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individuals rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (SCOTUS 1803)

An unconstitutional law is void and is as no law. An offense created by it is not crime. A conviction under it is not merely erroneous but is illegal and void and cannot be used as a legal cause of imprisonment." Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (SCOTUS 1879)

An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed. Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (SCOTUS 1886)

Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them. Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (SCOTUS 1966)

[See the language? "Rule-making" and "legislation" result in private corporate "laws" and "statutes" and "administrative codes" that apply to our Subcontractors and their employees, volunteers, and dependents --- not to us.]

"The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows: The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

"Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it...A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 177

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it. The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 256

Executive Orders and other Presidential Directives have no general applicability and lawful effect on anyone other than those in the Executive branch of government and even they must be Constitutional. In Confederate Bands of Ute Indians vs. United States, 330 U.S. 169 (1947), the U.S. Supreme Court noted that presidential authority may not be created by arbitrary action of the President of the United States even if an Executive Order was issued."

So, folks, there you have a good run down of the facts as they apply to you, if and when you reclaim and declare your birthright political status as an American---- but until you do, you have to hop through every hoop, pay every fine, and obey every order issued to you by your own employees and subcontractors.

Think about that. Until you declare your political status as an American and seize-back your birthright and your property assets, THEY can force vaccinations and other "tests" on you, THEY can shut your businesses down, THEY can arrest you for no reason at all, etc., etc., etc.,

Run, don't walk to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net and get started today.

----------------------------

See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website. 

How do we use your donations?  Find out here.