Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 9600 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own.


Monday, June 10, 2019

The Meek Plot - So-Called


By Anna Von Reitz

My sources in the Catholic Hierarchy are all scurrying around like mad ants, preparing for a big announcement about returning the assets to the "indigenous people" of the Earth, trying to make their narrative about the "meek inheriting the Earth" play out in real time.  Only the "meek" aren't meek and its all just more bull designed to excuse things that were always inexcusable now as well as then. 

Its time for everyone to fully realize that the only time that exists is right now. Trying to repair the past by making more injustices manifest in the present is just a recipe for disaster.  So get ready for more idiocy on a half-shell.  

If we were in receipt of anything like a Good Faith effort -- which we are not thus far -- then all the False Doctrines would be sorted through and thrown out.  It wouldn't just be the Doctrine of Discovery on the rubbish heap of history.  It would be the Collective Entity Doctrine and a lot of other doctrines, too, examined and jettisoned as flotsam.

The fact that the Holy See hasn't made correction and is more intent on pulling a big publicity stunt has not escaped anyone in my circle.

It also hasn't escaped us that the Stigmatics are all bleeding, all at once, all over the Globe, indicating that Jesus is suffering over the idiocy of men and our governments and the violence and misery that their present actions --- however well-intended --- are on course to cause.

I guess that this is what comes from making men wear dresses and funny hats and not allowing them to get married and have families of their own.  They lose track of actual life and what it is all about and what will work and what won't.  

I read the piece about the "Secret Constitution" -- but there are no secrets, just things nobody has been told or bothered to learn. There are long-standing misunderstandings about our Federal Constitutions-- some of them deliberate that need to be guarded against.  So please bear with me once more:

"The United States" is the proper name of our national union of republican states controlling the soil jurisdiction of this country.  It was adopted on September 9, 1776.  At the same time, a federation of States was formed and named "The United States of America" controlling the international jurisdiction (both land and sea) belonging to The United States.  Five years later, in March of 1781 -- still during the full fight of The American Revolution--- a confederation of States of States was formed doing business as the "States of America".

See how that works?  Nation gives rise to Federation and Federation gives rise to Confederation.

It had to follow through in exactly that way and exactly that order, because the "land" jurisdiction underlying the soil cannot be accessed until and unless the soil jurisdiction (national jurisdiction) is claimed first--- just as you can't define or get to the flesh of an apple without the skin.  You have to claim the "skin" --- that is, the soil jurisdiction defining the national turf in physical terms first.  This is the home place of our republican states of the Union, dba The United States.  Notice that this is a proper name: The United States and it is not the same as "the" United States.

Next, you claim the international land jurisdiction underlying the soil and the international sea jurisdiction naturally belonging to the country, and for this job, our ancestors created States and a Federation of States doing business as "The United States of America".  Note that this is a proper name: The United States of America, and it is not the same as "the" United States of America.

You have to have physically defined States operating both the soil and land jurisdictions before you can create States of States and a Confederation of these entities.  "Florida" has to exist before you can have a "State of Florida" and also, the Federation has to exist before a Con-federation can organize.

All these different entities occupy different jurisdictions and act in different capacities.

The United States = soil jurisdiction = republican states of the Union = Texas Republic (soil) and Republic of Texas (surface water).

The United States of America = international land and sea jurisdiction = States = Virginia, Maine, California....

States of America = global commercial jurisdiction = incorporated States of States = (originally) The State of Maine, The State of Virginia….. these are all called Confederate States, but they are actually all inchoate corporations. All the entities that fought in The American Civil War were commercial corporations, not actual States.

Obviously, States of States, that is, commercial corporations acting as Confederate States at all levels, can be chartered by any government. Our big problem has been that our original Federal States of States (Confederate States) were all disabled and moth-balled in the wake of the Civil War, so we've had foreign-chartered interlopers in here cracking the whip. 

So now it comes as no big surprise that there are three (3) Federal Constitutions, either ---

The Constitution for the united States of America  --- governing the structure and operations of the States of America --the original Confederation-- describes the duties and limitations of this government under contract to provide certain enumerated government services. 

The 1787 Constitution is set up to define exactly what powers the States are allowing the States of States to exercise "for" them and under what limits. It addresses American business organizations under contract to our States to provide stipulated government services, but there have been no American organizations in this position since 1868: the Federal States of States haven't been "reconstructed".

Instead, the Brits and the French-Benelux-Swiss-Holy Roman Empire goons have been in here "helping us out" of house and home and substituting their own Territorial and Municipal State-of-State organizations to do the work of our own Federal States of States, like The State of Maine.

The Constitution of the United States of America -- reiterates the structure and duties of "the" United States of America -- the British doppelganger operating "in our name" to exercise our powers delegated to it.  This addressed British business organizations under contract to our States to provide agreed upon services.

The Constitution of the United States - again reiterates the same basic plan for the Municipal Government which is operating "in our name" to exercise our delegated powers for us.  This addresses the rights and duties of the Municipal corporations which, like the States of America, are all business organizations in the business of providing stipulated government services.

The Constitutions set up the three branches of the Federal Government -- Federal, Territorial, and Municipal -- to provide us "essential government services" and to exercise our own "powers" for us to provide those services.
The Constitutions are glorified government service contracts backed via international treaties.  They spell out which subcontractor gets to manage which piece of the pie--- a pie that belongs to the States of the Union. 

The Constitutions are international contracts, not commercial contracts. 

That is why you can't "reach" the Constitutions in a Municipal COURT and the strongest evidence there is yet, that the creation and attempted foisting off of Municipal PERSONS named after Americans is a deliberate attempt to circumvent the Constitutions and their guarantees.  If we are acting in the capacity of PERSONS we "can't get there from here". We can't invoke the protections or the guarantees of the Constitutions as "presumed to be" Citizens of the United States.

By "conferring" municipal citizenship on us and "gifting" us with multiple Municipal PERSONS without our knowledge or consent, the rats have attempted to subject us under commercial law and tried to make us liable for their odious hypothecated debts, and have deliberately sought to create unconscionable contracts with minors and do all sorts of other evil -- and do it "in our names" no less.

This entire scheme has been a conspiracy to undermine and circumvent and vacate and otherwise avoid the lawful restraints and obligations of our Constitutions--- and to deny the American People the guarantees and protections they are heir to and owed. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

What the Evidence Suggests


By Anna Von Reitz

With rampant speculation ongoing about what "really" happened in England recently between the Queen and Donald Trump --- let me suggest that the evidence suggests that the Queen is removing her government from the middleman position, and letting The Donald have direct interface with the Municipal Government system run by the Vatican. 

This makes sense, because the Queen was being squeezed between a rock and a hard place, acting as a Vassal of the Holy Sea in various capacities and also then being relied upon to act as our Trustee on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, at the same time.  Can anyone say---gross conflict of interest?

As profitable as it was, it can't have been a secure or pleasant position to be in, so no surprises that the Queen under the pressure of her advisers would wash her little gloved hands and hope for the best.

This also makes sense because The Donald actually works for the Municipal Government as the President of the United States---- but he was having to go through the Queen and bow and scrape because she has been holding a portion of our Delegated Powers and exercising them "for" us.  Now he doesn't have to run interference with the British Government and can go directly without Protocol to the Vatican.

The incoming mail also suggests that everyone is blaming the criminality and nastiness on the Lord Mayor of London and the Government of Westminster, which is true, but hardly responsible given the trusteeships and treaties involved: both the Queen and the Pope were supposed to be riding herd on the Lord Mayor and the British Crown and providing oversight on the "ways and means" of his procurement operations worldwide --- not letting them devolve into the biggest racketeering and identity theft scheme in world history.

So now all of a sudden we have what they are calling the Global Defense Fund or the Global Security Fund or Economic Security Fund or Exchange Stabilization Fund or whatever other name(s) they want to assign to the same pile of ill-gotten assets that the rats assembled and used to utterly rig and control the world currency markets --- about $65 trillion in assets used to manipulate, control, and enforce their schemes and interfere with the economies of other countries.

Well, whoopee-ding-do, I suppose it could be in worse hands than Donald Trump's.

The situation also suggests that instead of Steven T. Mnuchin enjoying a semi-autonomous position as a sort of Co-Chair in control of the Commodity Rigging Fund (CRF)--- that's what I and the other Cynics call it--- working for the IMF as an Interpol Officer, he will be pulled in and acting under the thumb and forefinger of Mr. Trump, which, as Mr. Trump appointed him, is the way it is actually supposed to be. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Sunday, June 9, 2019

News Flash for the US Department of State....


By Anna Von Reitz

News Flash for the US Department of State....

….and also for the United States Department of State, the US State Department, the United States State Department, the US STATE DEPARTMENT, or however else you wish to cobble things up and rename and shuffle and shamelessly, criminally misconduct your business operations: 

We, the American States and People, are not Municipal Citizens of the United States, did not ever even reply to the offer made by Franklin Delano Roosevelt specifically to Municipal Citizens of the United States --- and were under no obligation to reply, since his remarks were obviously not addressed to us.  

Nor can we be presumed to be subject to any undisclosed, unilateral or implied commercial contracting process, as our commercial vessels have been dry-docked and otherwise moth-balled since 1868.  We couldn't have been operating in commerce nor be subject to any commercial law in 1933 and the issuance of commercial vessels in our names as purported gifts is just self-interested fraud.

Rather, you and your bosses are all under obligation to honor a normal course of business with us and to erase all trace of your improper presumptions against us and our property assets, especially the private property assets of average Americans. 

That means the lawful conversion and revenue of absolutely everything you unlawfully converted in 1933.  It also means providing correct passports. It also means providing access to the National Credit we are owed.

This jig is up. 

Correct your records and operations on our shores.  Return the National Credit and the land titles owed to the American States and People or be exposed in front of the whole world as a crime syndicate overdue for liquidation. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Know The Commonwealth History or Else


By Anna Von Reitz

Last week I had an amiable conversation with Joseph Gregory Hallett, the last of King John's offspring, and still Keeper of the Commonwealth, alive and kicking in New Zealand.  He is loyally beating the streets for the Commonwealth and that's fine with me--- within reason.

What is the Commonwealth? 

The Commonwealth as a concept developed in the Dark Ages when the Church was in receipt of private bequests from estates without heirs.  The Church took these gift properties and developed them to produce benefit for the Church and its Parishioners and for the support of the poor and sick.

The concept developed further under the auspices of the First Holy Roman Empire, when King Pepin the Short donated a whole kingdom to the Pope, giving the Church property to manage on the scale of a whole country. Additional holdings were secured under Charlemagne and the Church's role as a property manager and Earthly rulership expanded.  They applied the principles of The Commonwealth to their holdings and prospered.

Monasteries were supported by the labors and entrepreneurial skills of the Christian Brothers and Cloistered Orders, and to this day, we are all familiar with the vast range of products they continue to produce--- everything from applesauce to zinfandel, with the profit going to support Mother Church and local administration and outreach to the poor.

In England the Church struggled along and formed alliances with the Catholic Irish and Welsh rulers and gradually spread the concept of The Commonwealth throughout England--howbeit with less material success-- but when the Catholic Normans invaded England in 1066, things began to look up.  William of Normandy was generous to the Church and granted decent land and woodlots to be managed as part of The Commonwealth of England, for the support of the indigent, sickly, and poor. 

The original deal made the Church the steward of The Commonwealth lands and they were responsible for their oversight and upkeep.  The King retained the title to the land and the Church received the beneficial interest.

And then came King John, 126 years later, and The Holy Alliance, wherein the positions were reversed --- and the Church held the title to The Commonwealth lands both as Donor and Beneficiary, and the King became the Steward, responsible for their oversight and upkeep. 

That's how things sorted out with King John and that is still the position of his descendants, The Keepers of The Commonwealth.  They are essentially Trustees working for the Holy See to preserve and manage the lands and properties (like National Trust properties) that belong to The Commonwealth on a worldwide basis. 

So now Greg Hallett is stomping the circuit as King John's Heir, and making some remarks about The Magna Carta to the effect that it was "void" and had no force of law, etc., etc., etc. --- which is perfectly true with respect to The Commonwealth, but totally off-base and incorrect with respect to what is called "Greater England" and the Law of the Land established by the Norman Kings, which we know as The Magna Carta.

You can be perfectly sure that The Magna Carta applied and still applies to every cubic centimeter of British soil ever ceded to the Normans.

You can also be sure that the only land controlled by King John was in fact the land bequeathed to The Commonwealth: his nickname was "John Lacklands" precisely because he had no other land in England upon which to base his throne.

The Commonwealth started out with good intentions and for the most part has been competently managed for the Common Good of the Church and of the communities that the Church has served.  For that reason it has a long history of political support and in many areas it continues to provide better profits and more benefits than government-sponsored programs aimed at public property management.  The cynics among us maintain that most of this advantage is the result of de facto peonage, as the Church is able to make use of volunteer labor. 

So what does all this mean for us? 

For one thing, it means that for those whose landholdings derive from the Norman Conquest and from the Norman Kings who received sovereignty in their own right from William of Normandy, The Magna Carta has always been valid and accepted as the Law of our Lands for going on a thousand years, and we have no intention of allowing any claims otherwise.

America set sail under the sovereignty of William Belcher, one of the Norman Conquest Heirs, and so, for us, The Magna Carta is valid and does remain in effect as a basic foundation stone of our Land Law.  We take notice that the "land law" of The Commonwealth is actually nothing but the policies of the Holy See regarding property management; we respect their turf and hold our own. 

Any expectation or hope that we would be ignorant of all this or "drop the ball" and allow generalized claims invalidating The Magna Carta are sadly disappointed and the Holy See will have to go bark up some other tree to sell that bit of deceit. 

That said, we have been at peace with the Church for almost a thousand years and as embattled as it presently is as a result of its own indiscretions, let me suggest that the Church should be thankful that we are willing to honor our agreements even if they have manifestly failed to honor theirs. They should let well-enough alone, return our purloined property, and stop imagining that we are all chumps who failed History 101.

Those things that legitimately belong to The Commonwealth can still belong to The Commonwealth; all that property which has merely been seized upon and "presumed to be" donated, must be returned unharmed, free of debt or encumbrance.  We also expect that the people who have been disinherited by this chicanery and who have suffered de facto peonage will be compensated by the return of their individual land titles and access to their National Credit.

The motives that the Perpetrators of this scheme have for killing off their Priority Creditors--- exactly as they did in Nazi Germany--- have been duly noted and presented to the rest of the world. 

As a result, if they carry through on their plan to exterminate their creditors, the rest of the world will know what to expect from doing business with them. If they steal the assets they surreptitiously "borrowed" from the American States and People without returning them and without paying anything as interest, the rest of the world will know what to expect, too. 

We have what is popularly called "A Mexican Stand-Off".  We have demanded the return of our land titles and control of our actual assets, plus access to the National Credit we have earned.  They have scurried around made excuses and offered various dodges to avoid returning our property and avoid paying anything for the use of it. 

The most recent dodge is to try to claim that all our property was "donated" to some kind of non-existent Public Municipal Trust back in 1933 and rolled into a Commonwealth Estate. 

We have countered that that is pure hokum and shown exactly how flawed that claim is by deconstructing the language used by Franklin Delano Roosevelt in his First Inaugural Address, proving beyond any shadow of a doubt that he was addressing the Municipal Citizens of the United States and not the American People. 

We have also thereby demonstrated that Americans were not obligated to reply to an offer that was not and could not possibly be addressed to them, and that in any case, our commercial vessels were moth-balled in 1868, so that we could not in any way be presumed to be operating in commerce in 1933 and could not be subject to commercial contracting processes, either.

That is, unilateral and undisclosed and implied and secret contracting processes could not, did not, and do not apply to us, to our States, nor to our People, then or now. 

Ironically, this is proven true by the very circumstance that the Schemers used to substitute their own "State of State" corporate franchises for our original Confederate States of America.  They are caught in their own trap, as God Above would have it.

So not only is The Magna Carta still in effect, but the Commonwealth does not extend to America, nor any of the American States, nor to the individual estates of the people of this country.  Thank you, very much, for asking. And the Norman Kings are still standing, alive, well, and pissed off.

And now that we have settled those questions, may we ask when we may expect: (1) return of all our land titles and interests, both public and private, from our Trustees? and (2) access to our National Credit, which is needed to pay off bogus mortgages and other debts merely presumed to exist? 

We first made this demand in 1998.  We repeated it in 2008 and received sincere assurances that restitution would be forthcoming.  Instead, the agencies of the Municipal Government --- FBI, DOJ, IRS, FEMA, BATF, BLM, etc., have engaged in a crime spree of unprecedented proportions, and the UN Corporation has gotten involved and set up 800 internment camps for "resettlement" of Americans whose only crime is to be cheated by the Pope.

Its time for everyone to wrap their heads around this circumstance and more than past time for the Church and the Queen to get serious about returning the property owed to the American States and People and also to start paying back some reasonable portion of the National Credit that the people of this country are owed.

Twenty-one years have passed since James and I woke up and realized what was going on.  An entire generation of young Americans has sprung up in that time, and for the most part, they are even more dumbed-down than their immediate predecessors, less able to defend themselves from the outrages of those who pretend to be better than they are. 

We see from the circumstance who is truly elite and who is truly moral, as opposed to those hypocrites who have endeavored to steal the assets of their neighbors under a pretense of trust, and then planned to kill off and resettle their Priority Creditors.

And there is so much for the idea that we are or ever were Paupers, or ever part of The Commonwealth, either.

----------------------------

See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Instruction on the Festival of Pentecost

Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's
The Church's Year


What festival is this?
It is the day on which the Holy Ghost descended in the form of fiery tongues, upon the apostles and disciples, who with Mary, the Mother of Jesus, were assembled in prayer in a house at Jerusalem. (Acts II.)
Why is this day called Pentecost?
The word "Pentecost" is taken from the Greek, and signifies fifty. As St. Jerome explains it, this was the last of the fifty days, commencing with Easter, which the early Christians celebrated as days of rejoicing at the resurrection of the Lord.
Why is this day observed so solemnly?
Because on this day the Holy Ghost, having descended upon the apostles, the law of grace, of purification from sin, and the sanctification of mankind, was for the first time announced to the world; because on this day the apostles, being filled with the Holy Ghost, commenced the work of purifying and sanctifying mankind, by baptizing three thousand persons who were converted by the sermon of St. Peter; and because on this day the Church of Jesus became visible as a community to the world, and publicly professed her faith in her crucified Saviour.
Why did the Holy Ghost descend on the Jewish Pentecost?
Because on their Pentecost the Jews celebrated the anniversary of the giving of the law on Mount Sinai, and God would show by sending the Holy Ghost on this days that the Old Law had ceased and the New Law commenced. God also chose this time, that the Jews who on this day came together from all countries to Jerusalem to celebrate the Pentecost, might be witnesses of the miracle, and hear the New Law announced by the apostles.
Why is the baptismal font blessed an the vigil of Pentecost, as on Holy Saturday?
Because the Holy Ghost is the Author of all sanctity and the Fountain of baptismal grace, and because in the Acts (i. 5.) the descent of the Holy Ghost itself is called a baptism.
In the Introit of the Mass the Church rejoices at the descent of the Holy Ghost and sings:
INTROIT The Spirit of the Lord hath filled the whole earth, allel.; and that which containeth all things hath knowledge of the voice, Allel., allel., allel. (Wisd. I.7.) Let God arise, and his enemies be scattered: and let them that hate him, fly before his face. (Ps. 67.) Glory be to the Father and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.
COLLECT God, who on this day didst instruct the hearts of the faithful by the light of the Holy Spirit: grant us in the same spirit to relish what is right, and ever to rejoice in His consolation. Through our Lord Jesus Christ Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee, in the Unity of the same Holy Ghost, God, world without end, Amen.
LESSON (Acts II. I-II.) When the days of Pentecost were accomplished, they were all together in one place; and suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a mighty wind coming, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting. And there appeared to them parted tongues as it were of fire, and it sat upon every one of them:. and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and they began to speak with divers tongues, according as the Holy Ghost gave them to speak. Now there were. dwelling at Jerusalem, Jews, devout men, of every nation under heaven. And when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded in mind, because that every man heard them speak in his own tongue: and they were all amazed, and wondered, saying: Behold, are not all these that speak Galileans? And how have we heard every man our own tongue wherein we were born? Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and inhabitants of Mesopotamia, Judea, and Cappadocia, Pontus, and Asia, Phrygia, and Pamphilia, Egypt, and the parts of Lybia about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews also and Proselytes, Cretes and Arabians: we have heard them speak in our own tongues the wonderful works of God.
Why did the Holy Ghost come upon the apostles in the form of fiery tongues?
The appearance of fiery tongues indicated the gift of language imparted to the apostles by the Holy Ghost, and inflamed their hearts and the hearts of the faithful with the love of God and their neighbor.
Why did a mighty wind accompany the descent?
To direct the attention of the people to the descent of the Holy Ghost, and to assemble them to hear the sermon of the Apostle Peter.
What special effects did the Holy Ghost produce in the apostles?
He freed them from all doubt and fear; gave them His light for the perfect knowledge of truth; inflamed their hearts with the most ardent love, and incited in them the fiery zeal for the propagation of the kingdom of God, strengthened them to bear all sufferings and persecutions, (Acts V. 41.) and gave them the gift of speaking in various languages, and of discerning spirits.
Festival of PentecostGOSPEL (John XIV. 23-31,) At that time, Jesus said to his disciples: If any one love me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him, and will make our abode with him. He that loveth me not, keepeth not my words: and the word which you have heard is not mine, but the Father's, who sent me. These things have I spoken to you, abiding with you: but the Paraclete, the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and bring all things to your mind, whatsoever I shall have said to you. Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, do I give unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, nor let it be afraid. You have heard that I said to you, I go away, and I come unto you. If you loved me, you would indeed be glad, because I go to the Father; for the Father is greater than I. And now I have ;told you before it came to pass, that when it shall come to pass you may believe. I will not now speak many things with you; for the prince of this world cometh, and in me he hath not anything. But that the world may know that I love the Father, and as the Father hath givers me commandment, so do I.

Why is the Holy Ghost expressly called "Holy," since this attribute is due to each of the divine persons?
Because He is the Author of inward sanctity and of all supernatural gifts and graces, and therefore to Him is especially ascribed the work of man's sanctification.
What does the Holy Ghost effect in man?
He enlightens him that he may know the truths of religion and salvation, and the beauty of virtue; He moves him to desire, to aim after and to love these things; He renews his heart by cleansing it from sin, and imparts to him the supernatural gifts and graces by which he can become sanctified, and He brings forth in him wonderful fruits of holiness.
What are the gifts of the Holy Ghost?
According to the Prophet Isaias they are seven: 1.The gift of wisdom, which enables us to know God, to esteem spiritual more than temporal advantages, and to delight only in divine things. 2. The gift of understanding, by which we know and understand that which our faith proposes to our belief; children and adults should pray fervently for this gift, especially before sermons and instructions in the catechism. 3.The gift of counsel, which gives us the knowledge necessary to direct ourselves and others when in doubt, a gift particularly necessary for superiors, for those about choosing their state of life, and for married people who live unhappily, and do not know how to help themselves. 4. The gift of fortitude, which strengthens us to endure and courageously overcome all adversities and persecutions for virtue's sake. 5. The gift of knowledge, by which we know ourselves, our duties, and how to discharge them in a manner pleasing to God. 6. The gift of piety, which induces us to have God in view in all our actions, and infuses love in our hearts for His service. 7. The gift of the fear of the Lord, by which we not only fear the just punishment, but even His displeasure at every sin, more than all other things in the world.
Which are the fruits of the Holy Ghost?
As St. Paul (Gal. V.. 22-23.) enumerates them, they are twelve: 1. Charity. 2. Joy. 3. Peace. 4. Patience. 5. Benignity. 6. Goodness. 7. Longanimity. 8. Mildness. 9. Faith. 10. Modesty. 11. Continency. 12. Chastity. To obtain these fruits as well as the gifts of the Holy Ghost, we should daily say the prayer: 
COME, Holy Ghost, into the hearts of Thy faithful, and kindle in them the fire of Thy love. 
  V. Send forth Thy Spirit, and they shall be created; 
   R. And Thou shalt renew the face of the earth.

Let Us Pray 
      O God, Who didst instruct the hearts of the faithful by the light of the Holy Spirit, grant us by the gift of the same Spirit we may be always truly wise, and ever rejoice in His consolation. Through Christ our Lord. Amen.
Why does Christ say: The Father is greater than I?
Christ as God is in all things equal to His Father, but as Christ was at the same time Man, the Father was certainly greater than the Man-Christ.
Why does Christ say: I will not now speak many things with you?
Christ spoke these words a short time before His passion, and by them He wished to say that the time was near at hand when Satan, by his instruments, the wicked Jews, would put Him to death, not because Satan had this power over Him, but because He Himself wished to die in obedience to the will of His Father.

Saturday, June 8, 2019

A Word to John Best


By Anna Von Reitz

This is an official comment, directly from Anna von Reitz. John, with all due respect, your comments are all wrong. First of all, you talk about "We, the People" as many patriots do, without bothering to discover who or what the "People" being referenced are. Notice that the word "people" is capitalized? That "P" is there for a reason. The reason is that the "People" being referenced are acting in a specific capacity --- as the Lawful People governing the States of the Union. Correcting our political status records and acting in that capacity to assemble our actual States of the Union as "People" is exactly what I am teaching people to do ---contrary to your suppositions. I am, in fact, putting the pieces together to unite the People of this country to lawfully and peacefully self-govern. That is what The American States Assembly is all about.

I am teaching people the basics of how their government is supposed to be organized and I am pointing out the necessity of finishing the long overdue "reconstruction" of the Federal States of States. There is nothing "nonsensical" about it. It's the proper and lawful and established way for us to organize ourselves and conduct our own government and direct our own business. You suggest that we somehow use The Declaration of Independence to "remove our government" --- but it's not our government sitting in Washington, DC. Our government at the Federal level has been moth-balled for 150 years. What needs to happen is for our actual Government --- of the people, for the people, by the people --- to wake up and get organized and do the actual work of self-governance. All that we could do by "exercising" The Declaration of Independence is create another bloody war and blame others for our own ignorance and sloth and as you put it, "mind-numbing stupidity". Granted that we have been deceived and suffered constructive fraud, identity theft, Breach of Trust and a host of other evils, but also note that we were not awake enough nor motivated enough to do anything effective to prevent or even protest these crimes until now. For the most part, we have just trundled along under the lash of the tyrants and gone, "Oh, ho, hum, well, that's the way it is...." and paid more taxes and put up with more harassment until it has finally come to this. Be assured that this is not a "lie" and not a matter of "law". It is a matter of fact. Calling me a "liar" because I am not preaching insurrection against what is masquerading as "our" government is extremely irritating, most especially because I am not lying and am in fact offering the only course of action that doesn't lead to violence. 

To finish this comment --- our opponents in this game would just LOVE for us to blunder into their trap and "start something". They have been trying to get some kind of violent insurrection going for years.

They have tried all the motivators there are ---- race, religion, politics, false flags, you name it, and they have been trying to gin up something that would cause riots and other disturbances that they could use as an excuse to attack us all. Why? Because we are their Priority Creditors.
They owe us an unimaginably large amount of Credit and also unimaginably large amounts of actual assets. They don't want to pay us back. They want to kill us off instead, which is exactly what they have prepared for with 800 FEMA Camps and millions of body bags and 30,000 guillotines. Simply killing their Priority Creditors helps and enriches them in many ways. First, they don't have to pay anything back --- not the credit, not the assets, and not the interest. Second, they get to come in and claim all the "abandoned assets" of their victims -- our land, our homes, our businesses, our public facilities, everything. Third, they get to claim all the "Life Force Value Annuities" and Life Insurances they have placed on each and every one of us. Fourth, they get to charge the survivors for the "service" of killing us. This is why it is emphatically necessary for us to NOT give them any reason to do what they want to do. This is why we must follow the lawful path and do the work and give them no excuse.

----------------------------

See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

States vs. States of States


By Anna Von Reitz

Why, you might ask yourselves, was it necessary for the fledgling government of this country to create multiple organizations of states?  

We have the Union, The United States, formed of republican states occupying the national soil jurisdiction of this country.  

We have the Federation, The United States of America, formed of Sovereign States occupying the international jurisdiction of the land and sea.  

We have a Confederation of States of States, the States of America, formed of commercial corporations, occupying the global jurisdiction of the air.  

If you look at this list you will see the answer.  Each of these different organizations--- The United States, The United States of America, and the States of America----  all serve in different capacities and occupy different jurisdictions.  

Their member "states" are different in nature, too.   The national-level republican states and the international States of the Union are defined by physical borders, but the global States of States represented by the States of America Confederation are commercial corporations.   

So as you can see, each one of these organizations operate in profoundly different capacities and in different jurisdictions.  A state is not the same as a State, and a State is not a State of State [Confederate State]. 

We rarely have a reason to differentiate between our states and our States, because soil and land jurisdictions work so closely together that the evidence of one is evidence of the other.  General Session Laws of the State are supposed to reflect the will of the republican state and people, whereas State of State Statutes are supposed to "codify" and regulate the operations of the Territorial Government and their corporate personnel on our shores.  

An important distinction needs to be made here and underlined in Day-Glo Orange Highlighter.  

A State is corporate in that it is partially fictional by virtue of having a name --- say, Wisconsin---- but it is a free-standing entity that is physically defined, much as a man named Thomas Tinker is a free-standing entity that is physically defined. Neither Wisconsin nor Thomas Tinker is incorporated as part of some greater entity.  

In keeping with the Law of Kinds, a State like Wisconsin, is operated by People, like Thomas Tinker. 

A State of State, like the State of Wisconsin,  may be incorporated (chartered) by the greater, free-standing entity --- the State, which is what our original plan was when the Confederation of States was formed.  

Or, a State of State could also be chartered by a foreign government --- and merely set in place as a "service provider" which is in fact what has gone on here since the Civil War, when the British Government secretively came in here and arbitrarily put a Scottish corporation in charge of our State of State administration "for" us. 

States are sovereign entities; States of States, by definition, are not.  

Under the constitutional agreements, our States agreed not to operate directly as States of States, which is also part of the reason that we can be absolutely sure that none of our actual States were involved in the Civil War, which was a commercial mercenary fight among commercial corporations--- States of States, which are also called "Confederate States" even though they are not actually States at all.   

Since World War II we have further compounded the confusion between States and States of States by allowing the deployment of Municipal STATES OF STATES on our shores.  These incorporated franchises are totally foreign and are chartered by foreign governments in the business of providing essential government services.  

That is, the STATE OF WASHINGTON is not chartered by nor operating under the auspices of Washington, the State.  It is a franchise of the foreign Municipal United States Government and its infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, dba, the UNITED STATES.  

So, we have our native States which are corporate, but not incorporated, which are sovereign free-standing entities with physically-defined borders, and then, we have a plethora of foreign "service organizations" operating as Territorial States of States and Municipal STATES OF STATES, none of which are actually chartered by our States. 

This is not the way our government is supposed to be organized or operated. 

What should happen in a sane world is that the State, such as Georgia, charters a State of State and incorporates it to conduct business for Georgia.  

The original States of State were put out of commission by the Civil War and never "reconstructed" which has led to this situation wherein foreign Territorial and Municipal franchise organizations have been here on our soil conducting business "for" us and recklessly spending our money and credit as if we ever authorized them to do this.  

To solve this conundrum requires us to organize our actual States of the Union and to act in our capacity as the People of this country, and to finish the so-called "Reconstruction" that has been pending since the end of the Civil War.  

Put simply, the People of Georgia need to re-charter The State of Georgia to conduct business for them.  

We have been hampered from doing this necessary work by the foreign-chartered government services organizations on our shores arbitrarily conferring citizenship obligations upon us.  The British Territorial States of States claim that we are United States Citizens.  The Municipal STATES OF STATES claim that we are Citizens of the United States.  

It is up to us to thumb our noses at these patently false presumptions and tell our subcontractors and their employees that no, in fact, we are State Citizens and nothing else: Virginians, Californians, Minnesotans and so on, for each of the fifty States of the Union. 

It is also up to us to act in our own best interests and explicitly return to the land and soil jurisdiction of our States which is our natural home --- and deny them any excuse for their insupportable presumptions. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

52nd Anniversary of Israel’s Attack on the USS Liberty

Israel Is a Dictatorship, Not a Democracy

Paul Craig Roberts
Two days ago the US celebrated the 75th anniversary of D-Day with accolades to the armed forces and thanks to surviving veterans.  The country stood strongly with the military.  But today two days later is the 52nd anniversary of a day of shame when Washington turned its back on the US Navy. 

The Act of 1871 -- A Correct Analysis by Team Law


By Anna Von Reitz

With all the hub-bub about The Act of 1871 circulating in the patriot community, I felt it was time to re-publish (for about the tenth time) the actual breakdown of what happened to The Act of 1871 after its initial repeal in 1874 ----- and to publish again  the correct analysis of it all by Team Law, which was finished some years ago:

1871 - Act of 1871 ---“An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 ---which was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions---- “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)).

When looking at the intent of all this, given that the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, it appears, merely to set up “U.S. Corp”---

“That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the “District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation.” – Act of 1871 verbiage---

So the Act of 1871 was to create a private corporation owned by the actual government of the District of Columbia--- the infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation: 

“Further, the only government created in that Act was the same form of private government any private corporation has within the operation of its own corporate construct....... U.S. Corp  is not merely an incorporated municipality (District of Columbia); rather, it is a private corporation (District of Columbia Municipal Corporation) that was lawfully created by our original jurisdiction government.” ---- Team Law analysis.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
...