I Double-Dog Dare the [Territorial] United States Supreme Court

By Anna Von Reitz

Let's begin this discussion with this realization: you can be a king in one country and a slave in another. 

Is that clear enough? 

Is it also clear that different countries operate under different laws? 

Good. 

The United States is and has always been a different country with respect to the Territorial United States.  They function under two separate systems of law. 

This leads to a situation where the States (members of The United States land jurisdiction Union) function under a different system than the Territorial States of States (international jurisdiction of the sea). 

We have lawyers who are Counselors at Law and Justices (of the Peace) who administer the Public Law, which in a State is known as the General Session Law, even if the "State" is being represented as a Public Trust, and the Public Law generally, known as the Law of the Land. 

Again, So Everyone "Gets" It

By Anna Von Reitz

Again-- the power structure in this country is supposed to run like this:

People > Republics > Counties > States > The United States > The United States of America / Federal United States dba "United States" > Territorial United States dba "United States of America"  > Municipal United States dba Municipality of Washington, DC

You will notice that in your lifetime there is only fleeting mention of the Republics and that the Federal United States has been confused both with The United States and with incorporated businesses doing business as the "UNITED STATES" and the Territorial United States has been confused both with The United States of America and with incorporated businesses doing business as the "United States of America". 

All this confusion about who is who and what is what is being used to promote fraud of all kinds against the people and actual States.  Certain parties have gotten very rich from orchestrating this confusion and all these "similar names deceits" ---- and they don't want to give it up.  They have also exercised coercive and war-making powers that they have no right to exercise.  They don't want to give that up, either. 

As Part of the Ongoing Effort

By Anna Von Reitz

The article re-posted below will help you understand why Rod Class's Administrative Rulings matter.  The short answer is that  the State of North Carolina admitted that the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA is a private subcontractor, and that the State of North Carolina had no direct administrative control over the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and its employees. [Direct administrative control is the responsibility of the parent corporation, dba UNITED STATES and the US Bankruptcy Trustees.]

If you have been following the history, you already know why this is so. 

The Territorial United States franchise doing business as "the State of North Carolina" was bankrupted in 1933.  In 1946, it was still "incompetent" due to bankruptcy and the Bankruptcy Trustees appointed a Municipal United States Corporation, the UNITED STATES, INC., and its franchise doing business as the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, to take over the job of providing "essential government services". 

Joe Average in North Carolina didn't notice or care.  What difference did it make to him who swept the streets and wrote traffic tickets?  It was the same way throughout the country.  People were given no disclosure about any of these arrangements made "for" them. 

But as we shall see, private incorporated subcontractors are not subject to the same rules as public institutions--- and that gives rise to both the situation confirmed by Rod Class's efforts, and the situation described below by one angry attorney: 

DUN & BRADSTREET: 'RATING SERVICE' FOR ALL CORPORATE ENTITIES'

There are a few more things worth noting regarding the DUN & BRADSTREET listing service: D-B is a financial rating service for both ‘public’ and ‘private’ corporations. Utilities and municipal bond ratings would come under D-B preview for certain. It just really never occurred to me years ago when doing litigation discovery, research and analysis, and ‘structured settlements’ that there was seemingly anything incoherent with that fact that municipal and utility bonds are integral to D-B rating services. 

I never ever stopped to think about or scrutinize that fact, let alone allow my deliberation and research skills to ‘wander’ or ‘wonder’ into research that would have disclosed what we recently found. Part of the ease of discovering the complex web of inter-related inter-locking CORPORATIONS had to do with ease of electronic research over the internet. Years ago, if one wanted to search anything within any of the rating services, including “Moody’s”, Standard & Poors, and Dun & Bradstreet, + others, one would have to either have to be a subscriber to the service in order to manually expedite their search-rating results, or, one would have to pay a fee and cause a search to arise. 

D & B ‘ratings’ are affected every time a ‘public hazard bond’, or ‘surety performance bond’, or ‘indemnity bond’ is complained against. An ‘administrative complaint’ is usually all that it takes to cause a ‘tag’ or book entry to be made on any particular bond. Any particular bond, once complained against three or more times, causes a change in underwriting bond ‘risk’. For bonded Bar attorneys, who in many cases may also be appointed, commissioned, or elected to ‘public office’ as ‘Judge’, ‘Clerk of Court’, etc. when/if their bond is complained against for good and reasonable cause, their bond may be ‘pulled’, and due to loss of effective bond or ‘suretyship’, they cannot ‘practice’ or ‘discharge’ the duty of the office held, or occupied. 

In short, the bond maker-issuer is the bonding party for the benefit or on behalf of the ‘bondee’, ie. the purported ‘public officer’, ‘employee’, or ‘official’. This would extend as well to all other ‘public employees’ and ‘agents’-‘agencies’, etc. Every ‘person’ being bonded has a Dun & Bradstreet ‘bond rating’. At least it is reasonable to assume such. 

Once three complaints are filed against any bond, assuming they are with merit and well supported by fact and ‘law’ of the ‘breach’ of fiduciary duty, the bond is most always pulled or revoked. The ‘servant’ at ‘risk’ by assuming the responsibilities of operating in any ‘official capacity’ or by ‘employment’, can no longer be underwritten as a ‘no risk’ or ‘low risk’ contract. 

One incident of ‘breach’ or operating ‘ultra vires’, or ‘without the law’, causes the ‘immunity’ provisions of the written ‘law’ to cease to be effective, because when one violates the law as a ‘public servant’, one’s immunity blanket ceases to apply, thereby leaving the insurer or bondsman or bond issuer exposed to the liability arising from the servant’s acts, which under any ‘breach of law authority’ causes or gives rise to an ‘injury’ which is a civil or criminal commercial liability. 

Everything, whether civil or criminal or martial, is a matter of ‘commerce’, and admiralty law is the venue and jurisdiction by which disputes in/of commercial nature are resolved in truth and fact. 

All writings of the United States of America and of the UNITED STATES, or any other ‘government unit’ are forms of making an ‘offer to contract’. There is no written matter of material fact or issue of fact that is ‘law’ which is not bonded. There is no ‘office’ or function of ‘civil service’ or ‘public’ function that is not bonded. If the bond is not in existence, the bondee is ‘exposed’ and without ‘coverage’ by any ‘surety’. 

Therefore, there is no ‘guarantor’ behind the agent, officer, official, or employee having ‘exposure’, by ‘assumption of risk’, of a material breach or injury in fact by the bondee [person being bonded or insured]. This leaves the person under taint or cloud of operating ‘in the public interest’ without the constitutionally and statutorily required bond, and therefore, in tacit violation of the constitutions and statutes under the scheme of ‘law’. 

“Law” applies first and foremost to government, its employees, officers, and agents. In today’s rogue ‘doctrine of necessity’ ‘de facto’ environment, research has proven and documented that no person, performing as an ‘officer of the court’, being an alleged ‘judge’, being a ‘Bar attorney’ of the ABA or the Federal or State Bars, has a bona fide Constitutional Oath. 

The Bond that is supposed to be in existence sits atop the Oath. The Oath is not merely ‘incidental’ to the ‘office’ as has been ruled in some States by their corrupt court “officers”. The Oath is what imparts lawful and legal authority to the man/woman coming into ‘holding’ a ‘public office’ and becoming a ‘public official’. A public servant having no proper Oath cannot have a proper Bond to encompass or include those risks associated with the ‘office’, ‘discharge of fiduciary duty’ of the office, and the various levels or elements of ‘law authority’ underlying the office. 

Hence, one may take an Oath to any office of the incorporated State, or the UNITED STATES, and not take a preceding Oath to the unincorporated de jure state or United States of America, and operate non/un constitutionally, which is all that has been going on for years, but which was not known or Law-Lawyer tells of truth about oaths and bonds.doc Page 2 of 3 11 April 2008 understood as being a material breach to the People of the State/state, causing or giving rise to material injuries in fact as a consequence of operating ‘ultra vires’, ie. outside the corporate charters and ‘trust indentures’ which create the office in the first place. 

In the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, not one judge has taken the necessary Oaths of office, which include the organic ‘state’ de jure republic oath for “North Carolina”, and the subsequent and inferior or ‘lesser’ oath for the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. The latter ‘public entity’ has federal character, a Federal Employer Identification Number, a Federal Tax Identification Number, and is a federal ‘instrumentality’ of the CORPORATE ‘UNITED STATES’, and the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, under definition of 28 U.S.C. §3002(15), AND 26 U.S.C. §§7701 (a)(9) and (10). This documented fact pertains to every judge in every State court, but also applies to most every other ‘public official’ or ‘law enforcement officer’. 

I cannot address what other State public pretenders and ‘District Attorneys’ or “Prosecutors” do when bringing a criminal complaint against any “natural person”, which includes CORPORATIONS [YES, they are both the class of ‘person’ under statute ‘law’ definition], but in the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, when it is the bringer of the action, the People of the State are never brought in as ‘party to the action’. Only the CORPORATION name is found on the Criminal Complaint or Information form. Only the corporate State is present in the courtroom, trying a case before a CORPORATE JUDGE. 

There exists a complete breach and break from the Constitution of North Carolina, because the People of the republic North Carolina and their ‘law’ are not present in the action nor party to it. They are not in the courtroom, nor are they acting through any ‘officer’ of the People, as ‘District Attorney’, which Office alleges to be a ‘servant of the People’. It is NOT. Even the DA does not have the mandatory and proper Constitutional Oath as condition precedent under NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTES, which clearly state at Chapter 11, Section 11, there shall be two Constitutional Oaths taken. 

Absent performance according to that bonded STATUTE regarding bonded Oaths, leaves a clear and certain risk liability issue for the Bond maker-issuer. Some bonding agent has bonded the Statutes and other writings of the law of the State. Some bond issuer has bonded State ‘employees’, ‘officers’, and ‘public officials’. Some bond issuer has, therefore, “underwritten” risk on the basis of having full knowledge that there exist no Constitutional Oaths beneath the CORPORATE OATH. 

One cannot but presume that the bond issuer-maker has full disclosure; after all, ‘they’ have been registered within each State Department of Corporations, do business in all ‘States’ and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, and are presumed to know the “LAW”….including the “law of the land”, which under their “UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE” and all secondary ‘Civil’ or ‘Criminal’ Codes, would find itself to be in harmony with their legislative jurisdictional ‘statutes and implementing regulations’ at U.C.C. 1-308, 1-207, and 1- 103, wherein All Rights are Reserved, and the U.C.C. states that it is harmonious with ‘all jurisdictions’, which would include the jurisdiction of the “law of the land”, ‘common law’, and the various common law Constitutions of the underlying several de jure republic ‘states’ of the American union, aka, United States of America. 

Why would any bond underwriter knowingly underwrite these CORPORATE STATES, UNITED STATES, all of their ‘sub-corporations’, agents-agencies, instrumentalities, and their ‘law authority’ found in their various ‘writings’, private ‘laws’ etc., to operate a ‘public’ or ‘municipal’ construct as if it were ‘lawful government’, but knowing that it really is not?  [Answer: they have named us-- our private ESTATES as the sureties of their bonds, so in order to get relief or restitution for their evil deeds, we have to injure ourselves.]

The underwriters of bonds, therefore, could not allege any defense against a massive intake of related claims by private inhabitants of any of the States or UNITED STATES who have been “compelled” under duress, extreme duress, or risk of extreme duress and prejudice of ‘seizure’, ‘confiscation’ ‘impound’, ‘occupation’, ‘detainment’, or injury or termination by any means of potentially lethal force? 

Everyone who has ever been inside a State of North Carolina administrative or judicial ‘law’ proceeding, or been before any ‘clerk’ or ‘judge’ of same, or been prosecuted by any County District Attorney within said State/STATE, has been within a “brutum fulmen”: Black’s Law Dictionary, 4t Edition: “brutum fulmen”: “An empty noise; an empty threat. A judgment void upon its face which is in legal effect no judgment at all, and by which no rights are are divested, and from which none can be obtained; and neither binds nor bars anyone. Dollert v. Pratt-Hewitt Oil Corporation, Tex.Civ.Appl, 179 S.W.2d 346, 348. Also, see Corpus Juris Secundum, “Judgments” §§ 499, 512 546, 549. 

The “Office of Sheriff” is a most important link between the People of any de jure republic ‘state’ and the Courts, and Offices of the State. However, it has been discovered that many Sheriffs do not, as Chief Law Enforcement Officer of any local ‘county’ or County, have a bona fide prior or ‘precedent’ Constitutional Oath to their respective republic state. Or, they may have taken a bona fide Constitutional Oath, and then disclaimed or disavowed it immediately henceforth by taking a CORPORATE Constitutional Oath. “A man cannot serve two masters”.

This same “axiomatic” principal applies to ‘officers’ of the United States as well. How can the newly ‘sworn’ Attorney General of the UNITED STATES, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL [a federal corporation] take a Constitutional Oath to the United States, or UNITED STATES, and be held to such an Oath as ‘liable’ for his/her breach of fiduciary duty to the people of the United States of America, or to the franchise corporate trust estate ‘citizens of the UNITED STATES’, when the office ‘holder’ enjoins by contract to the ‘international purposes of Law-Lawyer tells of truth about oaths and bonds.doc Page 3 of 3 11 April 2008 INTERPOL’, under its Constitution [charter-contract] at Article 30 shortly after taking said Oath? Article 30 is quite explicit in meaning and intent. If one understands the “international purposes of INTERPOL” and all other ‘international agencies’ was and is to ‘establish a financial dictatorship within the United States/United States of America’ for the benefit of undisclosed third parties, under jurisdiction and authority of the IMF-U.N, then all of the lower level ‘breach of duty’ by lack of proper Bond and Oath issues would begin to make clear sense. [Jeff Sessions and Steven T. Mnuchin are both Interpol Officers and have renounced all loyalty to this country and its people.]

In short, all alleged ‘public servants’ are serving ‘public policy’ and ‘public administration’ of the ‘laws’ and enforcing those laws to protect the CORPORATION, to the disinterest and detriment of the People, whom have been ‘captured’, ‘searched’, ‘seized’, ‘boarded’ as with a ‘vessel’, and which People have been placed into ‘warehouse storage’ as ‘human capital’ and ‘property’ of the de facto King or “Sovereign”, which/who has conquered and occupied the Office of the People, and subverted and subordinated it into an Office of Inquisition for YOU KNOW WHO!!  [This is an example of the corruption fostered by Satanists within the Roman Catholic Church, of which many Catholics are completely unaware.]  

Lacking mandatory Oath, creates liability against the bond of the STATE, and every officer-agent-employee who has come to be ‘employed’ thereby. Breach of any underlying writing of the STATE, or State, or state, as an offer to contract in admiralty venue, is a certain “injury in fact” giving rise to a “material injustice” and resultant ‘liability’. There is no longer any question about ‘risk analysis’ or ‘damage assessment’. 

The only real issue is “HOW MUCH IS THE INJURY WORTH”? WHAT PENALTIES should be compelled above the mere “pecuniary” or monetary ‘relief’ to be sought? Treble damages? Punitive damages? Civil or Criminal or BOTH? If Oaths and Bonds have not yet been ascertained for all relevant federal and State officers, agents, and employees, they should be compelled by FOIA request or subpoena duces tecum1 immediately so that the elements of contract and breach of duty by these ‘public servants’ under mandate of relevant Constitutions, statutes, regulations, etc., including the U.C.C. in Admiralty venue can be comprehensively determined; then, a resultant ‘cause of action’ constructed accordingly. 

It is further axiomatic that: “Where a liability in equity arises due to injury by any party, and that party does not also provide a “remedy” for said liability, the injured party has the right and standing to create his own remedy” 

Persons without proper Oaths do not and cannot have proper Bonds OR satisfy the necessary requirements to “hold” a bona fide “Office”, by ‘commission’, “election”, or “appointment”. In short, an ‘Officer’ or “Office Holder” cannot but ‘occupy’ the office under false and misleading pretense, misrepresentation, and FRAUD, which strips the ‘individual’ of ‘law authority’ and ‘immunity’ under well-seasoned law of the land and sea. Brutum fulmen!! 

Bonds that are attached to such juristic ‘persons’ are subject to claim and lien, after “adequate assurance of due performance” has been found lacking pursuant to U.C.C. 2-619. A proper Oath and Bond are but two of the three primary “poles” of “Office” [Oath, Bond, Commission]. One cannot act upon being ‘duly appointed’ or ‘duly elected’ or ‘duly commissioned’ simply by INCORPORATION and CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS lacking bona fide Constitutional nexus is without “law authority”, and therefore has no nexus to the Constitutionally protected ‘Right’ of “due process”. Hence, any act or action taken against any one by any alleged ‘official’, ‘officer’, agent’ or ‘employee’ lacking such nexus is subject to CLAIM and/or COUNTER-CLAIM in Admiralty venue and proceeding. The claim, once perfected after ‘exhausting administrative remedy’ is brought against the Bond and the DUN & BRADSTREET rating of that CORPORATE PERSON will be affected as a consequence. The idea is not to seek an illegitimate claim for merely punitive or monetary purposes, but to seek claim on the basis of protest, dispute, redress, relief, and ‘remedy’!!! S 

__________________________

I need only add that since this article and other information like it has come to the surface and Rod Class has definitively proven that the relationship between the State of North Carolina and the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA is what it is, the STATE franchises have been forced to enter bankruptcy, too, as the claims against them for the injustices perpetrated by their employees quickly became overwhelming. 

This is entirely the fault of those organizations for failure to operate according to the Public Law of this country, and under no circumstance should the people of this country be "presumed" to be sureties liable for the appointments made by foreign bankruptcy trustees and the acts of foreign municipal employees who were never qualified to be bonded or to serve in any public capacity related to us. 

The corporations responsible are trying to shuffle off the liabilities created by their often criminally mis-directed employees as well as their own profligate unauthorized spending back onto the victims of this debacle, and we are saying no and saying it in no uncertain terms. 

We are not the "sureties" for these interlopers.  We are their Priority Creditors and the Priority Creditors of their parent corporations and affiliates as well. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Rod Class Cestui Que Vie Trust Fact Check Birth Certificate Estate A4V Discharge Research

Cestui Que Vie Act 0f 1666 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha... http://www.mncourts.gov/ruledocs/gene... Rule 220. Birth Certificate selective service http://www.militaryfreeschools.org/PD... Alien Registration Act of 1940 http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Docu... Nature of the Rights of a Cestui Vie Trust

A Few Update Comments

By Anna Von Reitz

1.  I was just informed that none of the Talkshoe links to the DailyPaul 2012 article about Rod Class's Administrative Rulings work.  

Then, I was informed by other parties that Talkshoe "lost" all those episodes and that patriots who recorded them at the time are scrambling to put together a new website where these recordings can be accessed again.  They will let me know the details and I will let you know the details. 

This just underscores the point that I am trying to drive home --- save and record and get hard copies of everything, because there is an organized effort to obscure information.  The people we are dealing with are liars with a long, long history of book burning, record falsification, semantic deceit, and obscuring information that is not complimentary to their position. 

Those of us who have been doing this any length of time take it for granted when they "move the cheese" and records are altered, reordered, re-published, redacted, deleted, "no longer available".  This is nothing new.  This is nothing different.  This is the way it is and the way it has been the entire time I have been working this problem.  

So, all you Newbies just getting started--- be aware.  You will need to copy and buy old dictionaries and haunt legal bookshops and do all sorts of things to secure your information. Once you have it, try to get it into a form where you can share it --- scan it, make and distribute digital copies, make sure that it isn't going to "disappear" again. 

The Biggest Back-Fire in History

By Anna Von Reitz

THEY, the Territorial United States, planned to vacate the Constitutions -- all three of them. 

THEY had already moth-balled and usurped upon and taken over the duties of the Federal United States 150 years ago, so that was no problem.  With a little finagling and a lot of unauthorized spending, they figured they could bankrupt both their own corporations and the Municipal United States corporations, too.  

Just run up a giant debt, let the corporations acting as providers of "essential government services" --- Article IV --- go bankrupt, so as to sever any connection to the actual constitutional agreements, and off-load all their corporate debts onto the unwitting backs of the American People. 

Then, they planned to boot up a new corporation, call it something deceptive and sexy like THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, charter it in a foreign country like France so nobody would catch on, and then sneak right back in the back door and establish themselves as the Successor to the service contracts they vacated by a process of assumption.  

We'd assume that they were our own dear Federal Government, because we'd assumed that twice before.  Why wouldn't we go for the sop a third time?

Instruction on the Festival of Pentecost

Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine's
The Church's Year

What festival is this?

It is the day on which the Holy Ghost descended in the form of fiery tongues, upon the apostles and disciples, who with Mary, the Mother of Jesus, were assembled in prayer in a house at Jerusalem. (Acts II.)

Why is this day called Pentecost?

The word "Pentecost" is taken from the Greek, and signifies fifty. As St. Jerome explains it, this was the last of the fifty days, commencing with Easter, which the early Christians celebrated as days of rejoicing at the resurrection of the Lord.

Why is this day observed so solemnly?

Because on this day the Holy Ghost, having descended upon the apostles, the law of grace, of purification from sin, and the sanctification of mankind, was for the first time announced to the world; because on this day the apostles, being filled with the Holy Ghost, commenced the work of purifying and sanctifying mankind, by baptizing three thousand persons who were converted by the sermon of St. Peter; and because on this day the Church of Jesus became visible as a community to the world, and publicly professed her faith in her crucified Saviour.

Why did the Holy Ghost descend on the Jewish Pentecost?

Urgent Information for Political Candidates

By Anna Von Reitz

I cannot possibly overstate the urgency of the information I am sharing with you.  

The actual sovereign government and its immediate structures is shown in red.  The Federal Government operating under powers delegated to it by the sovereign government is shown in blue. 

Here's how the American Government actually organized and authorized delegation of power: 

People form Families and Families form Family Farm Communities = Colonies

The United States (original) -- formed by the Colonies via The Unanimous Declaration of Independence and State Declarations.   The Colonies did not disappear. The Colonies went on to form themselves into republics --- for example, The Maine Republic (land jurisdiction) and The Republic of Maine (sea jurisdiction).  See The    Ultimate Supreme Republican Declaration of the United Colonies of America.  They also formed independent States = Estates doing business as Georgia, Maine, New York, et alia.   The separate States hold the soil (national) jurisdiction and The United States (original) holds their national level soil jurisdiction in common for the purposes of the Declaration commitment. Soil is defined as the first six inches of the Earth's surface.  

Oldie But Goodie -- Rod Class Forever!

By Anna Von Reitz

I am re-posting this Article from Daily Paul 2012 in its entirety, because one of my readers tried to access it and couldn't --- like so many other key pieces of information (unless you save hard copies and to your own hard drives) -- it has "disappeared".  Now you can see why.  

These Administrative Rulings are, in my opinion, one of the greatest steps forward, up, and out, of the gross Breach of Trust and criminal mis-administration this entire country has suffered--- ever.  When you say your prayers at night, remember to add --- "and thank you for Rod Class.....bless him and protect him and all those who are helping him...."  

If you remember who you really are --- take the steps necessary to re-establish your Trade Name on the land and soil of your native state of the Union without delay. 

http://annavonreitz.com/basicforms.pdf 

and then, go join your State Jural Assemblies.  Go to the Michigan General Jural Assembly and also check out https://theamericanstatesassembly.net/ .   People create States and without you, your State of the Union doesn't exist.   Get moving now! 

Editors Note:  All the original links were not active so I went to the Wayback Machine and found the archives of the articles and posted those links here instead.

_______

Rod Class gets FOURTH Administrative Ruling “Gov’t Offices are Vacant”- All Gov’t Officials are “Private Contractors”

Carpetbagger Courts -- Part 1

By Anna Von Reitz

Carpetbagger Courts - Part 1

Remember when I exposed the fact that Carpetbagger Courts were established in the South following the so-called Civil War?

In May of 1865, the Territorial United States Congress created ten new military district courts in the South, and placed them under the command of Brigadier Generals who were charged with appointing civilian judges--- judges loyal to the North, whose main job was to plunder and pillage whatever was left in the South, and to suppress any remaining rebels to ensure the public peace....

So what happened to those courts?

These military district courts are still with us today and still being deliberately confused with Territorial District Courts that have been improperly ensconced on our soil, too.

Remember the discussion about different entities all being called "United States" and the confusions that result?

Follow Up on Affidavits

By Anna Von Reitz

Yesterday, I reported on exactly how these cretins endeavored to render us helpless and voiceless --- first by unlawfully converting our life estate into public estate trusts --  and then, as no incorporated entity can make an affidavit, disabling us in the realm of commercial law.  

Overnight there has been a flurry of inquiries --- help, help, how can we deal with this? 

Re-convert your estates.  Do what I have been thumping on everyone to do.  Re-Convey your Trade Name to the land and soil of your native state. 

Here is a SHORT list of advantages. 

1.You step outside the box they've put you in and reappear as their Employer, owed good faith service, and all the guarantees of the Constitution(s). 

2.The "United States" you are owed can no longer be "presumed" to be the Territorial United States and must be interpreted as the actual United States. 

3. You can no longer be presumed to be subject to statutory law. 

4. So long as you object, you can no longer be presumed to be subject to licensing, property taxes, federal income taxes, etc.

5. Instead of being "interpreted" as a bankrupt debtor, you have to be interpreted as the Priority Creditor. 

SERCO, SES, Comments

By Anna Von Reitz

Many of you are aware of the fact that SERCO, a giant British conglomerate, has been----among other things---- acting as Paymaster for our military and the IMF has been paying Social Security pensioners. All our most crucial administrative functions have been out-sourced overseas. 

Serco has also been providing communications and transportation systems (which they then control) worldwide, and otherwise placing itself in positions of key importance impacting the security of our country and many others as well.  It is the physical, actual instrumentality of what has been called "the global control network"---- a vast interlocking trust directorate working through incorporated government and agency networks overseen in this country by a highly paid, largely faceless, and totally un-elected entity known as the "Senior Executive Service" --- the SES. 

Those who have followed the work of Field McConnell realize how our entire country has been compromised and endangered by reliance on SERCO and SES--and how this is now being corrected and monitored.

I am re-posting this recent article for everyone (below) and have just one wry, cautionary comment.  

The writer makes the following statement-- "I've come to understand that the kooky conspiracy theory about how the United States did not win the Revolutionary War for freedom from British control is true."  -- he's not the only one to be waking up to the deal-making that went down in the 1783 peace talks, but  I want to point out that the proof of that "kooky conspiracy theory" has been on the books for over two hundred years.... and yes, the Territorial United States ---not the actual United States --- has always been under British control.  

__________

Shocking Global Control System Exposed

Mass Shootings – When will these atrocities be stopped?

by James Jaeger

How many more mass shootings have to happen, before we as a nation address these atrocities? Well, we’re making a movie right now that DOES address them.  The movie is titled GOOD GUYS WITH GUNS – How an Armed Citizenry Deters Tyranny and Atrocities. An “atrocity” is like what happened Friday morning when 10 people, most of them kids, were slaughtered in yet another mass shooting at a school.  There have been over a dozen school shootings in the last year! As usual, all the networks and pundits are screaming to take away guns. Our movie proposes different solutions, solutions you will never hear on network TV.   In the movie we propose things like taking a look at 1) the psych drugs the shooters are on; 2) the violence from Hollywood movies and games; 3) the ill-prepared schools; 4) the growing “gun-free zones”; 5) the lack of concealed carry by teachers; 6) the moral decay since Engle v. Vitale  removed worship in the public schools and 7) the motives of the Globalists who want to usher in a one-world, totalitarian police state.

Holy Moly!!!!!!! This Is the BIG ONE!

By Anna Von Reitz

The Fourth Maxim of Commercial Law is crucial.  It establishes the Due Process of Commercial Law by demanding that someone stick their neck out and declare their responsibility for telling the truth to the court by providing an affidavit. 

TRUTH IS EXPRESSED IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT. (Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13: Num. 30:2; Mat. 5:33; James 5: 12). 

I have not had much respect for Commercial Law and haven't studied it a whole lot, mostly because I noted years ago that it was broken.  It doesn't work the way it should. Specifically, affidavits don't work.  The courts ignore them. 

Now, almost by accident, I know why and it is so simple, it's stupid. 

First, via the "US Citizen" political status fraud, the vermin re-defined us as "decedents" --- that is, people who willingly declined their birthright estate.  Next, they "enfranchised" us --- created multiple business entities and public trusts and public utilities named after us -- all that remained  on the public record were incorporated entities: JOHN DOE, JOHN M. DOE, and JOHN MARK DOE, and it was these incorporated entities that the courts addressed.  

And the "Rest of the Story is......."

Burning Books 101

By Anna Von Reitz

It began in Alexandria, with the burning of the famous library there.  It has continued down through history.  Burning books and destroying records is the hallmark of criminality -- especially government-sponsored criminality.  

We saw it when the British burned Washington, DC, in the War of 1812, we saw it in the so-called American Civil War when Sherman sacked Atlanta and Richmond, we saw it in Germany in both World War I and II, we saw it in New York on 911.  One of the primary objects of all these terrible venal actions was the destruction of records.

In more recent times, simply falsifying vast numbers of public records has been adopted by the same guilty parties --- such as the human trafficking on paper that the American People have suffered, purposefully mis-identifying millions upon millions of them as British Territorial United States Citizens.  

It should come as absolutely no surprise to anyone that the records of the Territorial United States Corporations are constantly being destroyed, archived, culled, re-ordered, re-published, issued in re-numbered, re-annotated, and re-structured versions.  Except for really famous cases like the Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States any court cases or opinion utterances damaging to the agenda of the criminals among us are likely to disappear or be shuffled off.  Even current news stories that are "uncomplimentary" regularly disappear.  The links vanish, as in this case reported to me today by "illusion buster"--- and I quote: 

Don't Make This Common Mistake

By Anna Von Reitz

I am re-posting an insightful, heart-felt, and pointed article from John Whitehead that appeared in Zero Hedge (below).  In it, John Whitehead asks --- with abundant food for thought --- Is the US Government Evil?   And the answer in view of the facts has to be a resounding ---yes, the US Government is evil, however..... thanks to the semantic deceits and political usurpation of the British Territorial United States, it isn't clear to the average American or other people around the world which "United States" is at fault. 

Let's make this perfectly clear --- America has been at peace for a 150 years.  The entity responsible for the endless wars and misery is not the actual United States, but is instead the British-controlled Territorial United States.  Two completely different entities, both of which may be called "United States"---- and the criminals among us simply don't distinguish between the actual United States and the Territorial United States--- leaving us to take the blame for their evils. 

Don't blame America for this.  Blame the actual source of the oppression and evil-- which is the British Government, not ours. 

Is The US Government Evil?

Meet the Raj

By Anna Von Reitz

Mahatma Gandhi faced off the brutal Raj in India and now, we meet them here. 

Make no mistake, most of the world is facing the same Raj today.  We simply didn't know who they were or how they were operating, but now that we do, it is apparent that the same British Commercial Feudalism that kept India strangled for the better part of a hundred years has done the same here and throughout much of the rest of the world, too. 

These are people so brutal and cheap that they would keep poor farmers from harvesting salt from the sea -- salt that they needed to live in India's hot climate, salt that they needed to preserve their food, salt that God gave them for free --- but for which the British Raj charged top dollar and defended their evil practice with guns. 

The UN Trusteeship

By Anna Von Reitz

The UN Trusteeship

According to this mammoth fraud against the American States and People, we just disappeared one day, like the ships of the Dutch East India company or the Templar Fleet before them, and deserted all our property here in America, leaving it behind in the care of our servants for hire -- the British-controlled Territorial United States.

As such, we were deemed by those same dishonest servants to have "donated" our "abandoned" estates to the good of whomever, and most likely, to ourselves, should we ever "return" from "over the sea".

Of course, we were never informed of our purported absence, nor of our supposed donation of our good names and assets.

As Mark Twain noted when this fraud first started --- rumors of our death have been greatly exaggerated.

The Public Law and the Private "Law"

By Anna Von Reitz

More mirroring. 

Yesterday, I discussed the necessity of nailing down exactly which "United States" is being referred to in every instance and brought attention to the fact that our Territorial servants have defrauded us via the use of deliberate confusions and semantic deceits.  

This process of "mirroring" everything is endemic, from the sacred office of the Pope being mirrored by the secular office of Pontiff, and the United States of America, Inc. being passed off as The United States of America (Unincorporated) on down.  It therefore comes as no surprise that The United States created by the Colonies back in 1776 has been "mirrored" by the United States exercising powers delegated to it in 1787, and that the Territorial United States and Municipal United States have made merry with the name "United States", too. 

This basic principle of the Satanists holds true throughout their system.  They label everything and mirror everything, even the law itself. 

The Public Law is mirrored by their private law. 

Our Sheriffs are peacekeeping officers.  Their Sheriffs are law enforcement officers. 

Clearfield Doctrine

By Anna Von Reitz

The Clearfield Doctrine (which Larry probably can't find, either) arises from a 1943 Supreme Court Case, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 US 363-371.  

The essence of the case is that when an incorporated government uses private bank script as its currency it sinks to the level of any other incorporated entity, loses its sovereign status (if it ever had any) and becomes subject to the same laws as any other corporation.  

You can look up the actual case to your heart's delight, but it is also reprised in CJS, as I was kindly reminded tonight by a friend: 

Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS)  91 CJS United States sec. 4

".....when the United States enters into commercial business it abandons its sovereign capacity and is to be treated like any other corporation."

Now, if you have followed along you know that the British Territorial United States was never sovereign with respect to us.  It was merely a contractor providing us with specific governmental services and acting under our delegated power to do so.  All "federal" powers were delegated to them and all federal powers are limited to the international jurisdiction of the sea. 

This United States or That United States?

By Anna Von Reitz

As we've learned, the favorite fraud technique of these con artists is called "mirroring" ---

They mirrored the Sacred Office of the Pope with the Secular Office of the Pontiff. They mirrored The United States of America (Unincorporated) with the United States of America (Incorporated).... and so it goes all the way down the line. Sometimes they even multiple mirrored things, as in the case we look at today: The United States (formed by the Colonies under The Unanimous Declaration of Independence) and the United States (the Union of National-Level States of States) and the Territorial United States and the Municipal United States.

Which United States are you talking about, eh?

It all depends on context, doesn't it?

And if you don't know the context, or, aren't aware that there are multiple entities that can be called "United States" ..... you can now see how easily the unwary could be entrapped, how you could assume that the "United States" you were thinking of was the "United States" being referenced on a form, for example.

And that is precisely what the vermin have done with all those many, many forms that have asked you if you were a "US Citizen"?

Hey, Fake Lawyer Larry! The Definition of Bar Attorney Is.....

By Anna Von Reitz

This is really too good.  

From the same "British Merchant Marine Service Manuel" published in 1801 that yielded the definition (finally) of "Withholding Agent" as a Warrant Officer in the British Merchant Marine Service comes this gem: 

A Bar Attorney is a Shipping Clerk in the British Merchant Marine Service. 

A Shipping Clerk.  That's what Larry Becraft is. 

Oh, my...... and the numbers on their Bar Cards?  Those are shipping ticket numbers.   That's how they tag cargo and get credited for their work. 

It makes perfect sense, too.  

Yes, There Are No States .... Wake Up, Oh, Glory, Wake Up!!!

By Anna Von Reitz

Thanks for the best laugh I have had in a long time.....

Bill Henshall has concluded an investigation and found out that there are no states!

Hahahahahahahah!

Hello, America?  I love you all!  --- But really, this is too droll!

Surely, you realize that the entire concept of a "state" or a "nation" exists only in your head?  That the reality of any such political entity or subdivision or kingdom or country is a legal FICTION? 

Surely, you have seen the names and borders of countries shift and change even in your own lifetimes?  Where is "Burma" now?  What happened to "Yugoslavia"?

My sides ache.  My mouth is dry from gasping.

Lord, Lord.....

The Historic Trusts, the World Economy, and You

By Anna Von Reitz

Long ago, wealth began accumulating.  It's a strange thing -- wealth. 

At a certain point it acquires the "critical accumulation mass" and it grows all by itself, like a cancer.  It goes metastatic. It diversifies.  It builds potential energy like water being backed up by a dam, if it isn't invested.  And if it is invested, it seeks opportunity much like flowing water, too, pushing into every new nook and cranny it can find.

It should come as no surprise then, that at a certain point, wealth becomes practically "un-spendable" by heirs.

What does one person do with a hundred trillion dollars worth of gold?

Another Voice Heard -- A New Avenue of Relief

By Anna Von Reitz

We have determined what was done to us, when, how, by whom.  And now, what goes around, comes around --- to quote my Nephew Jonathan's favorite adage. 

I have discussed at some length the pollution of the English Common Law by admixture with British Admiralty and Maritime Law that occurred in the 1750's and which has given rise to "the King's Equity Law" --- in which the King has all the equity and Judges sit as proxies for the King. 

Just as the vermin have mirrored everything else, it turns out that they have mirrored Equity Law, too. 

What they call "Equity Law" --- their kind of Equity Law --- isn't Equity Law.  

I guess we could have all told them that, eh?  -- but their semantic deceit and trashing of the entire concept of Equity Law, their defilement of its meaning and reputation, again conceals the truth of the matter.  

The Long and Short of It All -- Part 2

By Anna Von Reitz

All you currently active duty and reserve and retired United States Marines out there--  what was it you were shouting every day of your Marine training?  

Was it, "I am an American!" --- or was it, "I am a United States Citizen!"? 

All you United States Army guys --- which one are you?  

This same question applies to the Air Force, the Navy, even the Coast Guard.  

The answer determines whether you are an American and an honorable member of the American Armed Forces  or you are acting in the capacity of a filthy commercial mercenary -- albeit, not getting the big bucks of merc wages.

Did anyone ever tell you that when you signed up to enter military service you were enrolled as a mercenary in the employment of commercial corporations

and given a share in the profits via a stock portfolio?  No?  

Here It Is AGAIN for All Those Who Need to Know

By Anna Von Reitz

There is a widespread swath of gross ignorance in America populated by True Believers who think that they know all they need to know and devil take the hindmost. 

No doubt that is comforting to them and they cling to their suppositions accordingly, like Linus clinging to his Blanket. 

---Until, that is, they land in a "US District Court" and are told that they have no constitutional guarantees and other wake up calls come due. 

For all of those who think that I am a "Patriot Guru" and that I can't possibly know what I am talking about despite the abundant factual and actual proof that I do (admittedly not paying federal income tax since 1998, for example) here is a compilation of primary source quotes from people as diverse as Frederick Douglas and JFK in support of the information I am giving you---300 pages worth: 

https://www.scribd.com/document/100879878/We-The-Sheeple-Vs-the-Banksters

----------------------------

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

The Long and Short of All of It

By Anna Von Reitz

Either these people are: (a) my employees, owing me good faith service, or (b) they are foreign commercial mercenaries trespassing upon me and engaging in inland piracy.

In the first case, they are obligated to honor and protect my person and property. That is the only credible reason for any government to exist.

In the second case, they are pirates and every anti-piracy law ever created kicks into gear, including the international treaties that directly obligate both the Holy Sea and the British Monarch and their respective organizations to protect my person and property.

Read that: Checkmate.

----------------------------

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.