The ISIS 9/11 Psyop What Started It All and where is it going?

ForbiddenKnowledgeTV Alexandra Bruce March 11, 2015 
In this video, shot in the dining room of the Copacabana Hotel, where the incredibly awesome Anarchapulco 2015 event was held last week, Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange.org talks to investigative journalist, James Corbett of CorbettReport.com, about the most important information regarding ISIS. James gives a detailed and profound analysis of how ISIS was formed and the endgame that is attempting to play itself out. We must derail this "endless war" agenda, by knowing and sharing the facts. I have made a full transcript of this interview. Read it all. Forward this, cut 'n paste the text - and put it up everywhere that you can, on the Internet!!! Bless these guys!



Derail the War Agenda. 
We've Already
Got 1M Dead Iraqis. We Don't Need One More, in the Name of this Bogeyman, "ISIS"! - 

See more at: http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/911--false-flags/the-isis-911-psyop-what-started-it-all---luke-rudkoski-and-james-corbett.html#sthash.Gv2R8ahT.dpuf

Proposed CSKT Compact Fun Facts - UNPERMITTED ACCESS ACROSS PRIVATE LAND

At the hearing on HB 427 (Brown), which establishes a water rights defense fund, this past Friday, March 6, in House Judiciary, the CSKT’s lead water lawyer confirmed what had recently been suspected, at least since the Compact Commission attorney alluded to the matter at the informational session held in February:  Along with giving the CSKT instream flow rights for fishing throughout western Montana, the Compact would provide the basis, without limitation, for the Tribes and their members and others to have and exercise a permanent easement across private ground to access usual and accustomed fishing places “as if it is written in the deed.”  This is unpermitted access in the western third of Montana.

Here is the link to the Legislature’s video and audio archive page.   http://leg.mt.gov/css/Video-and-Audio/archives/av.asp.  Once you go there, select the “House” in the type of committee bar.  Then, select “Judiciary.”  As of today, the top selection in the menu is for the hearing held Friday.   Click on that at the word “Video” and scroll to 3:47:50, where you will hear Rep. Ellie Hill ask Mr. John Carter about this.  His answer is brief and to the point, ending at 3:49:45:  Where the right to fish is recognized, so is the right to unpermitted access.

 

There are a number of salient points to take from this. 

1.     The Compact, which no where explicitly mentions this matter of unpermitted access across private land, in fact lays the factual and legal foundation for such demands of a right to unpermitted access by the 4 to 5,000 members of the Tribes all over western Montana.   But wait!  There’s more!  The Compact also says, under “Persons Entitled to Use the Tribal Water Right,” (page 26, line 29 to 30):  “The Tribal Water Right may be used by the Tribes, their members, Allottees, or their lessees or assigns.”  The number of people demanding unpermitted access across private land is nearly unlimited under this language.  A robust fishing guide business could be built on this right, where “lessees or assigns” use this right to guide dudes onto and across private land without any permission.

2.     The “usual and accustomed” places open to access are completely undefined in the Compact so they are unlimited by it. 

3.     Pursuant to Treaty language, the right includes the right to construct buildings for curing fish. 

4.     Every area of Montana, therefore, where instream flow water rights for the purpose of fishing are given, or shared, with the Tribes is subject to unfettered access, without permission, by thousands of people, perhaps tens of thousands.  These areas are the Bitterroot river valley, the entire length of the Clark Fork River, the Blackfoot River, the Little Blackfoot River, the Kootenai River, the Flathead River and all three forks, Rock Creek, Flint Creek and many tributaries, lakes, wetlands, springs, and reservoirs.   No area has been excluded or cut a separate deal from this right of access and building. 

Based on a quick review of the published materials promoting this Compact, the proponents of the Compact, including state agencies, have never once mentioned that in writing that this “deal” also opens the land owned by hundreds of thousands of western Montanans to this right of access.  

It is shocking that the Farm Bureau, Montana Stockgrowers Association, and Montana Water Users Association would support such destruction of property owners’ rights. Perhaps they can be excused, temporarily, because they were ill-informed and poorly counseled.  The lawyer for Common Sense Citizens for the CSKT Compact, Ms. Hertha Lund, in fact denied that the instream flow water rights for fishing in the Compact provided this grounds for access, either out of ignorance or deceit.  You can see her say this, as confident as always, at the same link provided above if you scroll to 3:26:07 and watch until 3:27:32.   Mr. Carter had to correct her.

Whether from deceit or ignorance, the failure to candidly alert Montana to this consequence of the Compact raises serious questions, such as:

1.     Was this intended?  If so, why were we not informed?  If not, why was the issue not resolved in negotiation? 

2.     As the proponents have had to admit, the legal decisions do not provide a basis for water rights, but a right to fish, which, if found to exist by a court, means this permanent easement for access.  So why agree to give the CSKT instream water rights for fishing?  If one does that, why not as part of the bargain, limit access to the means allowed by Montana law?  Why leave it open? 

3.     For those Legislators who have voted for and supported this Compact, did you know of this consequence?  If so, why did you not make it clear?  If not, DO YOU STILL SUPPORT THIS COMPACT?

Many of us who know and respect you hope you were deceived and will now, publicly, withdraw your support for this bill. 

The standard the Water Court applies to invalidate a ratified Compact when an objection is raised by a party to a compact is that it must find “fraud, overreaching, or collusion.”  In the matter of the adjudication of existing and reserved rights to the use of water, both surface and underground, of the Crow Tribe of Indians of the State of Montana, Case No. WC-2012-06, Order Dismissing Objections, July 30, 2014, slip op. at page13. 

In light of the established fact that someone from the State of Montana Compact Commission offered up western Montana to the CSKT, rather than them demanding off-reservation rights, as admitted by a tribal attorney at the hearing on SB 262 in the Senate on February 16, [audio link here: http://montanalegislature.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?clip_id=15688&meta_id=97432 scroll to 4:50.], perhaps some collusion, or worse, occurred here. 

But you, Legislators, need not worry about litigation over that and neither do Montanans if you simply kill this very bad, confiscatory bill. 

Respectfully, 

--

Jon Metropoulos

Metropoulos Law Firm, PLLC

One South Montana, Suite L-3

Helena, Montana 59601

(406) 441-4872

(406) 461-4296 mobile

jon@metropouloslaw.com

Money as Debt - Your banks create it from your credit

Essential viewing on money and the banking system. Money As Debt is a fast-paced and highly entertaining animated feature by artist & videographer, Paul Grignon. It explains today's magically perverse DEBT-MONEY SYSTEM in terms that are easy to understand.

"When banks extend loans to their customers, they CREATE money by crediting their customers' accounts." - Sir Mervyn King, Speech to the South Wales Chamber of Commerce at The Millennium Centre, Cardiff on 23rd October 2012

Found here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqvKjsIxT_8

To see the whole picture of how all this fraud is used today to make the world's elite enormously wealthy while we all just get by or are maybe starving like many people in the world study this website:
http://www.annavonreitz.com

This App can stop police brutality and force cops to obey the law.

Please help support the completion of this smartphone application.

http://www.sidekikapp.com/       https://www.indiegogo.com/   type  sidekik app

Dear Paul,  

 

Last week, at Anarchapulco 2015, 

I saw Orion Martin give his 

presentation on a smartphone app 

that his company, Sidekik is 

developing. He's been told, that 

when completed, it may be the 

most complex in app history. 

Martin, an Afghanistan War Veteran 

spoke about the militarization of 

domestic police forces across the 

nation and I was struck by his 

compassionate presence and his 

open heart. We've all become so 

inured to the outrageous violence 

that goes on in our midst - and 

perpetrated by our governments, in 

our names - but during his talk, he 

made everyone in the room become 

quietly present to these daily 

atrocities.

(Later, I had conversations with him, 

including about what is happening in 

Afghanistan and his experiences were 

so hair-raising and sickening, that they 

violate the terms of service of my 

mass-emailer and Google Ads - so I 

can't even publish what he said!)

We've all seen and heard of the 

escalating police brutality and the 

hundreds of stories of police officers 

who've literally gotten away with murder. 

I even recently read a story about a 

Florida cop who's sodomized 28 young 

boys - and he's still on the job!

Well, this app is your answer to this 

growing problem. The moment you are 

pulled over or otherwise stopped by law 

enforcement, with one touch, the app will 

turn on your smartphone's video camera 

and instantly have the contents of your 

interaction recorded to a online server, 

so that even if the police officer smashes 

your phone on the ground and destroys 

it - this act will be duly recorded. 

If the officer does not smash your phone, 

your phone's GPS will give you the option 

of alerting up to 50 lawyers in your area, 

who are waiting to not only take your call 

but to *represent* you, at the scene of the 

intervention - the time of the most urgency. 

The lawyer can proceed to have a video-

streaming, recorded conversation, in your 

defense - directly with the police officer - 

because you have the right to remain 

silent - and you SHOULD remain silent.

At the time of his talk, Martin made no 

mention about what had driven him to 

create this app. I discovered on his website, 

that his good friend was beaten half to death 

by cops, and that "...After the punches, 

kicks, baton strikes, pepper spraying, 

and tasering were over, [his friend] was 

laying on the ground and still conscious. 

This is when he overheard the three 

officers talking to each other about  

their concerns that their criminal assault  

had been recorded. After ransacking

the victim's car and finding no recording 

devices the officers were now free to 

follow standard procedure and charge 

their victim with assaulting police 

officers and resisting arrest."

 

Martin was at his friend's trial and watched 

as a jury convicted his friend of the charges, 

even though the officers couldn't keep their 

stories straight and all the physical and 

circumstantial evidence showed he was 

innocent. Martin concluded that the only 

thing which could have resulted in a different 

jury decision would've been audio/video 

evidence of the officers' assault streamed 

and recorded to a remote server, to prevent 

the cops from destroying the evidence.

"Sidekik solves the problems of data 

recording and preservation as well as a lack 

of legal knowledge, and works to bring 

accountability for police misconduct through 

financial consequences. Individually, using 

Sidekik can help prevent you from having 

your rights violated during encounters with 

agents of the State by providing the means 

by which an attorney can represent you and 

defend your rights during the encounter, 

which also tends to act as a de-escalating 

force in the situation"

Recently, a handful of towns have had to 

fire their entire police departments because 

the number of complaints against them has 

rendered them uninsurable.

"Sidekik will streamline the formation of 

lawsuits against police departments by 

ensuring that evidence of rights violations 

is preserved and by providing a steady flow 

of attorneys willing to file lawsuits based on 

that evidence. In short, when the use of 

Sidekik becomes widespread, police 

departments will have two choices: 

change the way they do business - or 

go out of business."

Martin also made no mention in his talk of 

his company's imminent crowdfunding 

campaign but I found out about it on his 

site.

In looking to do what I could, to help this 

project, I discovered that the Indiegogo 

crowdfunding campaign to raise the final 

US$130k for the app's completion launches 

this Monday, March 9th, 2015 - and if 

successful, the app could be available as 

soon as Q3 of this year. 

I don't see it up yet on Indiegogo but I want 

to make sure that as many people know about 

this as possible.

Enter "Sidekik" into Indiegogo's search 

engine, starting tomorrow morning, and if 

so moved, you can help to make this app 

a reality before the end of this year.

Video (6 and a half min): 

Sidekik App

http://www.ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com/page/27092.html

P.S. Please share ForbiddenKnowledgeTV emails

and videos with your friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

Alexandra Bruce
Publisher, ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com
Daily Videos from the Edges of Science

Republic of Texas raided. History you have never been told

Police Raid Texas Political Meeting, Seize Phones, Fingerprint and Photograph All Attendees



http://libertycrier.com/police-raid-texas-political-meeting-seize-phones-fingerprint-and-photograph-all-attendees/

The original article was found here:

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/police-raid-texas-political-meeting-seize-phones-fingerprint-photograph-attendees/

Open carry in Michigan

Published on Jan 6, 2015

http://www.facebook.com/hellssaints
WTF? We brought a flying drone out on our NINTH walk in the city. Even after we met with the chief of Detroit Police, and even after the entire department was made aware of our group, they still attempt to bluff us into a detainment. Dispatch was aware of our presence in the city over an hour before the police arrived.

All we exist to do is walk around cities in Michigan with our weapons exposed to initiate conversations with residents about open and concealed carry. We generally are met with overwhelming approval from residents.

Special thanks to Jackson Cop Block for the use of his drone.
https://www.youtube.com/user/JacksonC...

http://www.michigancarries.org

http://www.metrotimes.com/Blogs/archi...
http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/ind...
http://www.ammoland.com/2014/12/detro...
http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2014/12/...

Published on Dec 17, 2014

It never ceases to amaze us how certain law enforcement officers act like decent people, then their compatriots throw it all out the window. http://www.michigancarries.org

Obama using illegal immigration to socially engineer a new America within America

Breaking…WH Plans to Develop a “Country Within a Country” of 15 Million “New Americans”

http://www.independentsentinel.com/breaking-wh-plans-to-develop-a-country-within-a-country-of-15-million-new-americans/

The independent power of the Common Law Grand Jury

This may be the only peaceful solution left to restore America to freedom.



http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/

Do you have an Emergency Radio Communications Plan.

If you don't have comm you don't have anything.

This will enhance communications between groups by using HF single sideband ground wave propagation to add security and functionality to your comm plan.



Here is an excellent video from You Tube user MeOnTech.  He concealed a 2 meter band j-pole antenna on his balcony in a flower pot. Way to go!



This video will give you an idea of what the bands will be like in an actual emergency.
Everyone will want to talk at the same time, and it will take some practice to make any real communications traffic out of what we call a pile up.  This operator has a unique situation in that every time he gets on the air he has to deal with a pile up. But this is what it will be like when we have  a  failure of civility in our country.



To try to ease the pain in a real emergency we have band plans that will help to get the emergency traffic to the most people.

Oathkeepers band plan:
http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/emergencycommplan.pdf

AmRRon band plan:
This one used to be free but their costs are going up like everyone else's so they now charge $6 for a digital version. It's worth the money because there is much information that most of us have not thought about in planning for emergency communications.

http://www.amrron.com/comms-s-o-i/

Click this link for a nice ham radio bands chart:

http://www.amrron.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Hambands_color.pdf

Montana committing suicide if legislature passes water compact!

Sent at the request of author, Elaine Willman for immediate distribution.  Essential to read prior to SB262 going to the House for voting.  This provides “teeth and backbone” in our presentations.   cr

MONTANA in the 70’s: When the State Stood Tall for Its People and Its Lands vs. the  Self-Inflicted Injury of the Proposed CSKT Compact.

By Elaine Willman,

Author of Going to Pieces...

There was a time when the Montana legislature was at the forefront of environmental policy, state sovereign authority and diligent protection of the rights of Montana citizens.  Look at this interesting time line of events from 1970 through 1981 when Montana legislators were taking excellent care of their State and citizens:

1970  National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This federal mandate requires assessment and analysis for all significant projects affecting the environment, across the country.

1971  Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). Farsighted legislators passed, 99-0, a state mandate, MEPA,  requiring assessment and analysis for all significant projects affecting the environment. MEPA stepped up the “spirit” and strength of the federal act, NEPA, and significantly expanded the public right to participate in government decisions. Perhaps now we better understand why both of these environmental mandates have been avoided at all costs. The proposed CSKT Compact is in direct violation of NEPA, MEPA, and the Administrative Procedures Act of 1946, requiring due process and a remedy for grievances against government decisions. MEPA was preparatory to the development of a new Constitution for the State of Montana, adopted in 1973.

1973 Montana State Constitution. Legislators adopted a Constitution that incorporated the intent of MEPA into Article IX of the new Constitution, and additionally provided Montanans with 35 enumerated rights in Article II, including popular sovereignty, the right of participation,  and the right of self-government.

1975  Indian Education and Self-Determination Act (Public Law 93-638) provided tribes with the right to self-government and management of their own federal funds through contracted services.  Unfortunately, many tribes ignored the critical word prefix self in self-determination and took actions toward  asserting tribal government authorities to tax and govern non-tribal persons and properties.

1981  Montana v. U.S. 450 U.S. 544.  In 1973 the Crow Tribe attempted to assert its jurisdictional authority over non-tribal lands and persons. The State of Montana argued valiantly for many years to protect Montana citizens, and obtained the ruling in Montana v. U.S. that continues to be a landmark Supreme Court case protecting citizens in Montana and across the country from tribal governance over non tribal persons and lands.

Throughout the 1970s and into the 1980s the Montana governors and state legislators were diligently protecting state sovereign authority, state natural resources and the individual rights of Montanans. So what happened between 1981 and 2015? 

The emerging coalition of a powerful triumvirate: 1) federal Executive branch over-reaching; 2) tribal government political influence and tribal government over-reaching; 3) coalitions of environmental extremists; the trendy aboriginal and United Nations movement, and the globalists promoting Agenda 21. All of these folks are on the same page, singing from the same hymnal and absolutely dedicated to the demise of State sovereignty, citizen and property rights. This cumulative political and financial power has had oppressive and intimidating success among elected officials at every level of state government and academia in Montana. The 2015 Montana State Legislature does not remotely resemble the Montana Legislature of the 1970s, when the State was acting like a State and damn proud of it.

What will be the end result of the CSKT Compact if Montana's legislators breathe life into this legislative Beast?  Look again at the policies and laws noted in the time line above.  The CSKT Compact will render irrelevant the U.S. Constitution, the Montana Constitution, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Montana Environmental Policy Act, and this is just openers. Current state legislators passing the Compact will ensure their ongoing and future irrelevancy as elected officials of a state intentionally enfeebled by the CSKT Compact. Oaths of office and the Pledge of Allegiance are now just meaningless, irrelevant rituals. One of the finest State Constitutions in the country, Montana’s 1973 Constitution becomes toilet paper.

Another irony:  Passage of the Compact will also overturn hard-fought protections from tribal governance over non-members in 1981 Supreme Court case of Montana v. U.S. for Montana citizens; however,  the rest of the country will remain protected by this Landmark ruling of the High Court because the ruling protects citizens from tribal governance absent their individual consent.  The Compact legislatively removes individual citizen consent for some 350,000 Montana citizens in 11 counties that will be subject to tribal government control of their water, their water rates, and water-dependent land use.

The Compact is not just about water. It is now about the Rule of Law as well. Our federal and state Constitutions matter, or they don't. Our federal and state environmental mandates matter, or they don't. Supreme Court rulings matter or they don't. Exactly what does matter to current legislators and an entire cadre of well-paid Montana state attorneys? It certainly does not seem to be to uphold the Rule of Law in the State of Montana. The once youthful and muscle-bound State of Montana is voluntarily surrendering its Statehood to Assisted Living in perpetuity, to be governed by tribes, the federal government and International organizations intent on destroying State authorities, property rights and the rights of the Popular Sovereignty of each and every citizen. Montana is already buckling at the knees; the proposed CSKT Compact begins the process of turning off the State’s life support as a State. The battle then goes to all of the other Western States.

One more sad irony: There is within the rule of law the Doctrine of Parens Patriae. This is a legal doctrine wherein a State within its sovereign capacity may provide protection, and may even sue on behalf of, citizens unable to care for themselves. The proposed Compact will render tribal and non-tribal landowners, 11 counties and their municipalities, and some 350,000 Montanans needing water for the homes and businesses, hard pressed to pay high water rates, or take care of themselves in the future. Do you suppose your current or future Governors and State Legislator will step in to help them?

A victorious CSKT Compact opens the door for the federal government, tribal governments and globalists to fundamentally transform Montana to something unlike the proud State that existed in the 1970s. Montana legislators passing this Compact may just as well turn off the lights in the Helena Capitol because the CSKT Compact is a fatal, self-inflicted injury to State sovereignty and all of Montana's waters. Legislators voting for the Proposed CSKT Compact are assuring their future as useful idiots to federal, tribal and international influence.

Elaine D. Willman, MPA

Author, Going to Pieces . . .the dismantling of the United States of America

Work:  920-615-2882

Cell:  509-949-8055

1977 Mercury Marquis price reduced again

I have reduced the price on this very nice Mercury Marquis to $3900.

 

I was asked how this car would stand up to an EMP pulse. My answer is that there are only two parts that would need to be replaced

if an EMP ever did occur and it was powerful enough to damage those parts.  Chances are an EMP would'nt effect this but here you go.

 

There are no computers of any kind in this car. The only electronic components are the ignition module and the pickup module in the distributor.

 

The module (premium version) from NAPA is model TP40 and costs 61.49

The pickup module (premium version) is MP700   31.49

 

Take these parts and put them in a metal box (farady cage) in your closet and you are good to go.

 

In addition if you are a member of Oathkeepers and show me that, and you bring cash,  I might be willing to come down a bit more.

 

If you want to know more about farady cages  http://www.lincolncountywatch.org/emp.htm

 

Summer is coming. This rig really gobbles up the road.

 

See lots of pictures here:

 

http://www.mercurymarquis.info/

 

Paul Stramer  KC7MEZ
SLC Distributing
PO Box 116
Eureka MT 59917
800 889 2839
pstramer@eurekadsl.net
montanablog (dot) us

 

SB 262 water compact tabled in the Senate Finance and Claims committee

Maybe there is hope this water compact will go down in flames. 

CHAS VINCENT  when are you going to get it?

Instead of blasting it to the floor, YOU NEED TO WITHDRAW THIS BILL FROM CONSIDERATION!

If you don't you will seal your fate as a legislator.

 

----- Original Message -----

From: larkwic

Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:08 AM

Subject: SB 262 tabled in the Senate Finance and Claims committee

Teri Swenson reports

SB 262 tabled in the Senate Finance and Claims committee. Vincent threatened if it were killed or stuck in committee he would blast it to the Senate floor. How does a bill receive an adverse committee report?

Leg.mt.gov not yet updated to reflect that.

Wonder what the vote count was…

Committee Members

Member                                            Assignment

Llew Jones  (R) SD 9                        Chair

Bob Keenan  (R) SD 5                      Vice Chair

Mark Blasdel  (R) SD 4                    Member

John Brenden  (R) SD 17                 Member

Mary Caferro  (D) SD 41                  Member

Bradley Hamlett  (D) SD 15             Member

Kris Hansen  (R) SD 14                    Member

David Howard  (R) SD 29               Member

Jim Keane  (D) SD 38                       Member

Frederick (Eric) Moore  (R) SD 19   Member

Mike Phillips  (D) SD 31                  Member

Rick Ripley  (R) SD 10                     Member

Matthew M Rosendale  (R) SD 18   Member

Jon C Sesso  (D) SD 37                    Member

Cary Smith  (R) SD 27                     Member

Janna Taylor  (R) SD 6                     Member

Roger Webb  (R) SD 23                   Member

Jonathan Windy Boy  (D) SD 16     Member

Cynthia Wolken  (D) SD 48             Member

It’s too easy to forget just how many times our politicians, sworn to preserve and defend the Constitution, instead have tried to undermine or
destroy it.
- Lt. Col. Fielding Lewis Greaves, U.S. Army, Retired

Montana, have you learned NOTHING from the Bundy Ranch standoff?

From talking about the CSKT water grab with fellow Montanans around the state it is clear to me that they consider that bill to be unconstitutional and unlawful.

The feeling I get is that there are quite a number of people in our state that will not stand by and watch our water and land be stolen by out of control federal agents using the tribes as a vehicle.  They also know that the agenda of putting the water under federal control is just one part of the UN Agenda 21. 

They also know that the US Supreme Court has said all laws that are unconstitutional are null and void from their inception as if they had never been written.

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491. " An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton Vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442

Chas Vincent, you might think you are doing the right thing but you are pitifully uninformed. YOU JUST DON'T GET IT.

People like Chas Vincent are dreaming if they think the people in Montana are just going to lay down and be run over by this tyranny and watch their water be stolen right out from under their nose, by a pack of law (constitution) breaking wolves in sheep's clothing (legislators) who are trying to authorize plunder under the color of law.

Water is life. Without water Montana's economy, which is bad enough already, will certainly suffer, and all those families who have worked for decades to accumulate those water rights and prove ongoing usage in order to keep those water rights at great expense for the infrastructure for that water will be in danger of not being able to produce enough products to sustain their businesses and families.  This is nothing less than outright theft.

Montana is hurting bad enough already. IT'S TIME TO GET OUT OF STATE INTERESTS OUT OF OUR STATE especially the communist federal government !

Tell your legislators to vote against SB 262

If we can't convince the legislature to kill this, I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT THE PROPONENTS BE PRESENT WHEN THE FIRST HEADGATE IS SHUT DOWN AT THE FIRST RANCH THEY TRY TO STOP FROM IRRIGATING UNDER THIS NEW FEDERAL TAKEOVER.

Have these people learned NOTHING from the Bundy Ranch standoff?  The line in the sand was already drawn.
Killing SB262  and passing  HB583 are two steps in the right direction toward freedom in Montana.

Paul Stramer

LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice (UCC 1-308), in this email. The information posted here is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this email may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this email containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to our blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written by Paul Stramer. ©2005-2009 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Elias Alias <eliasalias@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:59 PM
Subject: Agenda-21 Backed By MHRN In Helena _ I could not help myself!
To: Elias Alias <eliasalias@gmail.com>, Dan Happel, Joan Stanley, and more than six hundred others...

Joan Stanley sent me the following link. I truly don't have time for this, but I also know that I cannot possibly let this travesty go by without making my own statement about the idiocy of the Montana Human Rights Network's Rachel Carroll  Revas, who has presented the Montana legislature's Judiciary Committee with a futile, impotent, flaccid, yet revelatory diatribe of nonsense.

When you go to the following link, be sure to watch the brief video which KXIH has featured to help MHRN drive home its effort to dissuade our legislators from seeing the truth about Agenda-21. Below this link I'll paste in the comment I entered under the KXIH article. (Note: at 11:30 pm on Monday night, February 23 2015, my comment is not showing, so I'm hopeful that it will clear moderation and get posted under the article there. If not, I've copied it below for your reading enjoyment.)

Thank you each for looking into this legislative effort by MT Rep. Randall Pinocci (R, Sun River).and supported by former Madison County Commissioner Dan Happel.

Salute!

Elias Alias, editor for Oath Keepers

http://www.kxlh.com/story/28181433/montana-house-judiciary-committee-pushes-back-against-agenda-21

My comment under that article:

eliasalias2 (signed in using yahoo)

It is surprising that MHRN still uses the lame tactic of attacking this bill by associating the proponents with "anti-government militias". This bill was not written by "anti-government militias", but instead was written by good neighbors who have bothered to look into just what G.H.W. Bush signed this nation onto in 1992 when the United Nations introduced Agenda-21.

Former Madison County Commissioner Dan Happel is a Montana rancher who has done extensive research into Agenda-21. Any reader here who doubts his knowledge, which is derived from literally years of research, need only look into the matter oneself.

MHRN has a hidden agenda of its own, which is to deprive Montanans of their Constitutionally-protected "unalienable rights" in the name of socializing all Montanans as "world citizens". To prove my point, I offer a Resolution by the Republican National Committee itself, which resolved in 2012 to expose the wickedness of Agenda-21 to all Americans. You can get the pdf for this RNC document by searching on Google or any other search engine using these key words "RNC, Winter Committee Resolutions, Agenda 21". Here is the text of what the Republican Party says about Agenda 21: (quoting)
-

RESOLUTION EXPOSING UNITED NATIONS AGENDA 21

WHEREAS, the United Nations Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of extreme environmentalism, social engineering, and global political control that was initiated at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the United Nations Agenda 21 is being covertly pushed into local communities throughout the United States of America through the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) through local “sustainable development” policies such as Smart Growth, Wildlands Project, Resilient Cities, Regional Visioning Projects, and other “Green” or “Alternative” projects; and,
WHEREAS, this United Nations Agenda 21 plan of radical so-called “sustainable development” views the American way of life of private property ownership, single family homes, private car ownership and individual travel choices, and privately owned farms; all as destructive to the environment; and,
WHEREAS, according to the United Nations Agenda 21 policy, social justice is described as the right and opportunity of all people to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment which would be accomplished by socialist/communist redistribution of wealth; and,
WHEREAS, according to the United Nations Agenda 21 policy National sovereignty is deemed a social injustice; now therefore be 

RESOLVED, the Republican National Committee recognizes the destructive and insidious nature of United Nations Agenda 21 and hereby exposes to the public and public policy makers the dangerous intent of the plan; and therefore be it further
RESOLVED , that the U.S. government and no state or local government is legally bound by the United Nations Agenda 21 treaty in that it has never been endorsed by the (U.S.) Senate, and therefore be it further
RESOLVED, that the federal and state and local governments across the country be well informed of the underlying harmful implications of implementation of United Nations Agenda 21 destructive strategies for “sustainable development” and we hereby endorse rejection of its radical policies and rejection of any grant monies attached to it, and therefore be it further
RESOLVED, that upon the approval of this resolution the Republican National Committee shall deliver a copy of this resolution to each of the Republican members of Congress, all Republican candidates for Congress, all Republican candidates for President who qualify for RNC sanctioned debates, and to each Republican state and territorial party office and recommend for adoption into the Republican Party Platform at the 2012 Convention.
As Approved by the Republican National Committee, January 13, 2012
-

So we clearly see that MHRN's Rachel Carroll Revas has her own Agenda, and would try to shift focus from the seriousness of this bill in its effort to protect all Montanans by associating the bill with "anti-government militias". What a cheap shot!

On the other hand, former County Commissioner Dan Happel has only this State's Constitution and our nation's Constitution at heart, and is trying to reveal something very sinister as the ngo's continue to work through the EPA, FEMA, BLM, USFS, and other non-elected Federal agencies to erode our freedoms as Montanans.

In closing, I would love to hear a logical explanation why this news outlet chose the pictures it employed in composing the above video as reportage on this bill. It strikes me as fairly blatant and disruptive to associate such imagery with purportedly objective reportage of news affecting all Montanans.

Salute!
Elias Alias, Eureka, Montana

If we let them take this ammo they will take it all.

M855 5.56 Ammo Ban Coming?

Please watch this informative video by one U-TUBER, it explains a lot to those that may not quite understand what the big deal is all about and reminds the rest of us.

  Get involved, sign the petitions, write BATFE and your congressman.
BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!!!!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UUIwxL-PGg

The Briefest Briefing On The Coming "Martial Law"

The American public is being conditioned to accept an "emergency-based" military-police state command structure which ranges outward from DHS through the Pentagon, FEMA and the Department of Justice, and uses Fusion Centers to coordinate the profiling of dissent among the population...... by Elias Alias

http://www.newswithviews.com/guest_opinion/guest271.htm

OathKeepers' Stewart Rhodes with Alex Jones on Community Preparedness Teams now being organized.

Water right fight goes national in the news

It's not just a fight about water rights in Montana!

Montana is in a fight for it's life and the freedom of private property rights including water rights that will set the precedent for the whole nation in coming months and years.

Montanans fight to the last drop over precious water rights!

This water rights fight has been picked up by national news now. They realize that this will set a precedent for the whole country.

The feds are using the tribes as a vehicle to take over the water and land in all the western states.

Read this article:

http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/montanans-fight-to-last-drop-over-precious-water-rights/

WE ARE ALL MONTANANS NOW

By Jim Beers 
Feb. 17th 2015

A stunning maneuver by the federal government was recently brought to my attention.  While it is directed at the government of the State of Montana concerning shooting ranges; there is a much broader precedent establishment being attempted that concerns every state official and every rural resident that farms, grazes, hunts, fishes, traps, owns animals and/or owns property or recreates in myriad ways on both public and private rural landscapes.

 

BACKGROUND:

-       Since 1987 Montana Shooting Sports Association and the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks have partnered to make about $25 M in grants available to local shooting ranges.  This wildly popular program has made a huge difference in the availability of safe and suitable places for Montanans to shoot and practice gun (and by extension hunter) safety.

 

-       Early in the program, federal funding was sought but insurmountable red tape from several federal sources made such funding impractical.  For more than a decade, in-state hunting license fees were used to fund the program

 

-       The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks has always administered the program and this was confirmed in a State Statute in 1999.

 

-       State funding budgets are confirmed every two years (the Legislature meets every two years).

 

-       In the last two funding cycles, the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks has diverted nearly all of this funding from the State budget for other purposes not budgeted by the Legislature such as employee pay raises.

 

-       This year the State Legislature is considering proposing putting the money they authorize for shooting ranges into a separate account to be used ONLY for shooting ranges.

 

-       The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks objects to this, claiming it violates the Pittman Robertson (Wildlife Restoration) Act that is the basis for federal collection of Excise Taxes on guns, ammunition, archery paraphernalia and certain imports.  Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks notified the US Fish and Wildlife Service Excise Tax administrators who have threatened to deny all Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration funds (over $27M last year) if the State tells their own agency where to spend the money they authorize for shooting ranges.  As a result, the State’s own wildlife agency is fixing to oppose the State legislature and Governor’s exercise of their duly elected and sworn duty to exercise oversight and set priorities OVER THEIR OWN EMPLOYEES WORKING IN THE STATE AGENCY THEY ESTABLISHED, AUTHORIZED, FUND AND FOR WHICH THEY (THE LEGISLATURE AND GOVERNOR) ARE THE SOURCE OF THEIR POWER AND CONTINUING OPERATION.

 

FURTHER FEDERAL BACKGROUND:

 

-       The US Fish and Wildlife Service Office that was notified by the State agency was the Federal Aid Program.  This State Excise Tax oversight office is the very office that “saw no evil, heard no evil, and said no evil” twenty years ago when their political bosses stole $45 to 60M of the Excise Taxes from the state agencies (and you and me and our wildlife programs financed by our license dollars and equipment purchases) and then used the money secretly to capture Canadian wolves and release them in Yellowstone plus open a new office in California to all but share space with the environmental extremist and animal rights radical organizations that were replacing the historic wildlife management and wildlife users organizations as federal partners.  Both the wolves and the office had been turned down by Congress and were refused authorization before the appointees, bureaucrats and the administration decided to simply steal the money, release the wolves and build the new office anyway.

 

-       This federal office oversees the operation of state wildlife agencies for compliance with Excise Tax uses named as “eligible” in the law and the operation of the state wildlife agency activities and uses of license revenue to remain eligible for their annual share or “Apportionment” of available Excise Taxes based on their area and the sale of hunting licenses in the state.  Historic violations included Excise Tax or license dollars used to purchase vehicles for state motor pools; or such funds used to pay state parks’ employees; or hatchery fish or upland birds released on the private property of donors and politicians; or lands purchased with such funds used to build a prison; or revenue from timber sales on such lands put in the General Treasury; or selling wildlife for profit.  These are examples of “diversions” and were supposed to be detected by audits by the overseers every five years as required by the law.  Despite this requirement, the twenty years preceding the theft of the $45 to 60M were marked by the all-but disappearance of any audits, a hiatus that was welcomed by federal and state bureaucrats as their working “relationship” became closer and closer and more and more “informal”.  When the theft of the money was exposed by a Government ACCOUNTING Office Audit, an audit firm was hired to audit every state wildlife agency and then to re-establish a 5-year cycle as required by law, corruption again reared its ugly head.  Less than 3 years into the audits, the auditors had had found millions of dollars in “diversions”; the states were screaming (quietly); and federal bureaucrats wanted no more scandals: so the auditors were fired for being “behind schedule” and the Interior Department Inspector General who was simultaneously responsible for overseeing US Fish and Wildlife Service (?) was then “hired” to resume the audits.  Needless to say, the “diversions” were evidently “mistakes” and never reported; and that particular Inspector General was introduced later by President Obama at his first State of the Union as the “New Inspector General for the Stimulus Program” that consisted of billions and which, like the state PR audits, was found to be as pure as the driven snow.

 

-       An “Acting Chief” of the above Office responded to the letter from the Director of the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks about shooting ranges and how those mean old Legislators and the Governor were about to tell the all-wise and smarter-than-everybody-else agency what to do!  Imagine!  Well, the
“Acting” (federal) Chief in what can only be described as an arrogant and laughable (if everyone rolls over for him) way said in his “view” (??) such administration by the State elected officials would “render Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks ineligible for further participation in the benefits (i.e. Excise Tax funding) of the (Wildlife and Sport Fish Program)”. 

 

He told the downtrodden State Director that, in “our (federal government?, USFWS?, Solicitor?, a frog in his pocket?) view the (sic Montana) FWP would suffer a loss of control of its hunting and fishing license revenues” if the proposed bill was passed.  All the State Director does is to tell the State officials that he will therefore be compelled to oppose the attempt by the Governor and Legislature to tell him (and “his” employees) what to do or how to do it.  The fact that the State Director offered no blowback to the federal threat is, take my word, a clue.

 

Two reasons given for this federal threat to deny any future Excise Tax sharing are taken from the Code of Federal Regulations govern the PR Act in the letter:

1.)  “Revenue from hunting and fishing licenses (must) be controlled only by the State Fish and Wildlife Agency.”

Does this mean that the Governor or Legislature cannot set priorities and expenditures for lawful and eligible Wildlife and Fisheries activities?  Of course not!  Can anyone argue that this Excise Tax program for conservation has contained within it for over 70 years an authority for federal bureaucrats to not merely assure that State governments did not MISUSE Excise Tax and Licenses dollars BUT TO DENY STATE GOVERNMENTS ANY ROLE IN THE ACTIVITIES AND PRIORITIES THEREOF FOR THEIR WILDLIFE AGENCY TO PURSUE JUST, LEGITIMATE AND ELIGIBLE (UNDER THE PR ACT) FISH AND WILDLIFE PROJECTS (that both the Act and the State agency share and agree on?  Since when did the responsibility to assure compliance intended to protect “Eligible Uses” of Excise Tax and License dollars morph into a federal bureaucrat power to tell the duly elected officials of a State government to stand down because the federal bureaucrats doesn’t agree with their and the people of the state’s priorities?

2.)  “Revenues from hunting and fishing licenses can only be used for administration of the State fish and wildlife agency which includes only the functions required to manage the agency and the fish and wildlife related resources for which the agency has authority under State law” and, “A State becomes ineligible to receive the benefits of the Act if it diverts hunting and fishing license revenue from purposes other than the agency’s administration.”  Really?

The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks was given the administration authority over shooting ranges by the Montana Legislature in 1999.

But, I am sure you are thinking, what about the federal view of shooting ranges especially in these days of gun control hysterics and the most anti-gun administration in my lifetime?

The PR Act and the Regulations promulgated under it define “Eligible Uses” of Excise Tax dollars and license revenues as “Constructing, operating and maintaining recreational firearms shooting and archery ranges” right alongside other eligible uses such as, “Management of wild bird and mammal populations”, “Managing wildlife habitat”, and “Providing public use that benefits from Wildlife Resources”. 

So the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks has the authority to manage shooting ranges and shooting ranges in totality are an “eligible use” under the federal Act and under State law, and the Governor and Legislature simply want more emphasis on it and for the agency to stop diverting shooting range money from where the State Legislators direct.  How does the federal bureaucrat suggest they do that other than what they are considering?  Will the federal bureaucrat pay for it like “the People” want?  Will the federal bureaucrat even allow the Governor and State Legislature to even speak with these ostensible crybaby employees or will they just get their priorities from Washington henceforth?  Federal priorities for Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, given their way, span everything from wolves and grizzly “management” in accord with federal dictates to fooling a hostile Montana public into allowing federal “free-roaming buffalo” to be loosed like Yellowstone wolves once were and for eventually the State to “assume management” (how sweet that sounds) of the latest federal imposition following federal dictates on rural Montana in cahoots with State employees.  All that takes money and Lord knows Montanans may want shooting ranges but federal bureaucrats want gun control and control of these ostensible “State” agencies AND their license revenue And their Excise Tax dollars to do what Montanans are obviously too dense to realize they should be doing if only they could see “the big picture”.

Finally, I had some extraneous, but I believe relevant, thoughts as I wrote this:

-       I note that the State agency is “preparing to argue against HB 234”.  This plus their request to federal overseers and then the absence of any blowback by the state agency to argue for the State (and evidently NOT the State agency’s) position leads me to believe that this State agency (like many others) is much more of a federal subcontractor agency than a State Agency.  As Struther Martin said in the movie Cool Hand Luke, I think that regarding the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks; the Governor and Legislature have “a failure to communicate”. 

-       State agencies are generally reluctant to identify with “shooting ranges” in these days of national and international environmental and animal rights “awareness”.  Shooting Ranges are generally like Trapping and Animal Control in these regards in that they anger those out to eliminate hunting and fishing and do things like loose free-roaming buffalo on rural Americans.

 

-       Wolves and grizzlies and like critters are loosed on a rural populace by federal bureaucrats and then “turned over” to state (is it their governments or one of these “independent” agencies???) management.  This federally mandated management of these animals is expensive and the federal bureaucrats and State bureaucrats WANT FULL CONTROL OF ALL STATE FUNDS AND PRIORITIES WITHOUT ANY ACCOUNTABILITY TO STATE GOVERNMENTS OR STATE TAXPAYERS.  This is not unrelated to these federal PR bureaucrats and State agency bureaucrats colluding to do just that with STATE LICENSE FUNDING EXPENDITURES AND PRIORITIES.

 

-       Federal bureaucrats these days accrue significant political and career benefits from enacting ways to further restrict gun uses, gun availability and ammunition supplies. Examples are – The secret negotiations by the State Department under Clinton and Kerry to negotiate a UN Small Arms Treaty that will shrink or abolish the 2^nd Amendment.  The Fast and Furious federal gun-running scheme into Mexico intended to create justification for more gun control that has never been explained.  Closure by EPA of the last lead smelter in the US.  Continuous statements by the President and Attorney General about the need to register and confiscate guns, etc…….  Is it not possible that any federal bureaucrats that can establish a PRECEDENT to abolish any vestige of State control of their state wildlife agency, or their state wildlife license revenue, or such agency’s activities, AND SIMULTANEOUSLY POINT THE WAY ON HOW TO STOP AND REVERSE THE GROWTH OF SHOOTING RANGES might not at least be in line for a bonus and maybe an eventual promotion and all that portends?  I do not doubt that this is involved in this whole tug of war between the government of Montana on the one hand and the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks & US Fish and Wildlife Service “partners” on the other.

 

Consider YOUR State wildlife agency.  It gets Excise Taxes and dances to a federal tune that is steadily pushing YOU and YOUR STATE GOVERNMENT out of the picture.  If Montana succumbs here; whether because of State employees that serve Washington and not your state government or because of federal bureaucrats that have silenced your organizations and are working so closely with your enemies that you won’t see what is happening until it is too late is immaterial: you will be like that lonesome German noted in the early 1940’s, “when they came for me, no one was there”.  Truly we are all Montanans in these regards.

 

Allow me two analogies: State wildlife agencies are becoming like that famous horse Lincoln once noted was bucking and got his foot caught in the stirrup and his rider (the Governor, Legislature and people of the state) leaned over and told him if he will just calm down, “I will get off so you can get up”.

 

The federal agencies (US Fish and Wildlife Service with its ESA and easement schemes with radicals; the US Forest Service with its Roadless/Wilderness/Grazing Shutdowns/Logging & Timber Management Elimination; BLM with its Bundy Fiascoes and selective use and management shutdowns; and National Park Service with its Viewsheds/Historic Zones/Total anti-natural resource management and use mission) are like Oscar Wilde’s famous Picture of Dorian Gray.  He was an outwardly handsome and wealthy man that made a pact with the devil that his secret life of corruption and vice would only be noted on a painting of himself hidden away in his attic while he stayed forever young and spotless.  Just as Dorian met an horrific end, so too will these federal agencies that are operating on a no longer real image that was once true but any longer simply conceals an existence of harm to people and abuse of power that will eventually end in something much worse than anyone imagines.

 

Jim Beers

17 February 2015