Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 7400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Do not attempt to comment using the handle "Unknown" or "Anonymous". Your comment will be summarily deleted. Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinon only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.

Thursday, January 23, 2020


The UN's Agenda for World Domination

Free Screening Friday, February 7, 2020 -- 5:00 PM Pacific
Hollywood, CA, January 23 /CNW/ –  The world premiere for UNSUSTAINABLE will start Friday, 07 February 2020 at 5PM Pacific (8PM Eastern).  For a limited period of time, single-family home owners, real estate investors, farmers, historic property owners and impoverished and/or disarmed people around the world are invited to join UN skeptics and UN apologists to screen Part I - "The Theory" of this 2-part mini series. 
The Premiere site is and other sites as announced.  Screening is free and DVDs will be available from MOVIE PUBS after the release of Part II - “The Reality.”
Part I - “The Theory” -- in association with MATRIX ENTERTAINMENT and OATH KEEPERS -- is 80 minutes long.  Synopsis, trailer, expert clips available at the official website at 
UNSUSTAINABLE features Agenda 21 experts TOM DEWEESE, ROSA KOIRE, MICHAEL SHAW, DEBBIE BACIGALUPI, LORD CHRISTOPHER MONKTON, WILLIE SOON and Constitutional experts EDWIN VIEIRA, KRISANNE HALL, JOHN McMANUS, G. EDWARD GRIFFIN, PASTOR CHUCK BALDWIN, STEWART RHODES, DAVID KOPACZ and others.  UNSUSTAINABLE is award-winning filmmaker, JAMES JAEGER’s, 10th political documentary centering on the U.S. Constitution and Biblical principles that informed it.  Produced by Matrix Productions, previous films include CORPORATE FASCISM, MOLON LABE, CULTURAL MARXISM, GOOD GUYS WITH GUNS, MAINSTREAM and Telly Award-winning FIAT EMPIRE featuring RON PAUL.
UNSUSTAINABLE traces the history of the UN and its "unifying principles" that have led to Agenda 21 and its spawns, Agenda 2030 and the Green New Deal under the banner of "Sustainable Development."  Is the UN using the environment and climate change to "justify" what guest expert, PAT BUCHANAN, calls an embryonic World Government?  That’s “The Theory.”
 -- Donations to Complete Part II Are Vitally Needed.  Go to --

-- Trailer at -- 

-- UNSUSTAINABLE on DVD will be Distributed by --

To participate in the dissemination of this Premiere, please forward this Release to your email list or
contact Diana Zoppa at Zoppa Media Group c/o or 310-867-6302


  1. haha... is it unsustainable or UN-Sustainable. same word, two very different understandings.

    1. Gonna be like the end of idiocracy, the original ending where it noted that the UN came along and UN-did everything that came before... Unsustainable becomes UN-sustainable... Unlivable, becomes UN-livable... see the game?


    Yeah, lets set them above the national govs… Not!

  3. ""So the question is not “will we get a new system?” but rather “whom will this new system serve?”

    Will this new system serve an oligarchical agenda at the expense of the nations and people of the earth or will it serve the interests of the nations and people of the earth at the expense of the oligarchy?

    Putin Revives a Forgotten Vision

    President Putin’s January 15 State of the Union was a breath of fresh air for this reason, as the world leader who has closely allied his nation’s destiny to China’s Belt and Road Initiative, laid out a call for a new system to be created by the five largest nuclear powers as common allies under a multi-polar paradigm.

    After speaking about Russia’s vision for internal improvements, Putin shifted towards the international arena saying:

    “I am convinced that it is high time for a serious and direct discussion about the basic principles of a stable world order and the most acute problems that humanity is facing. It is necessary to show political will, wisdom and courage. The time demands an awareness of our shared responsibility and real actions.”

    Calling for Russia, the USA, UK, China and France to organize a new architecture that goes far beyond merely military affairs, Putin stated:

    “The founding countries of the United Nations should set an example. It is the five nuclear powers that bear a special responsibility for the conservation and sustainable development of humankind. These five nations should first of all start with measures to remove the prerequisites for a global war and develop updated approaches to ensuring stability on the planet that would fully take into account the political, economic and military aspects of modern international relations.”

    Putin’s emphasis that “the United Nations should set an example” is not naïve fantasy, nor “crypto globalist rhetoric” as some of his critics have stated.

    Putin knows that the UN has been misused by anti-nation state ideologues for a very long time. He also knows his history better than his critics and is aware that the original mandate of the United Nations was premised upon the defense of the sovereign nation state. Article 2.1 of the charter clearly says: “The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.”

    For readers who are perhaps rightfully cynical that such organizations as the UN could ever play a truly positive role in world affairs, it is important to recall that the UN was never intended to have any unilateral authority over nation states, or military power unto itself when was created in 1945. Its purpose was intended to provide a platform for dialogue where sovereign nation states could harmonize their policies and overcome misunderstanding with the aim of protecting the general welfare of the people of the earth. Articles 1.3-4 state clearly that the UN’s is designed “to achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion and to be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.”

    If the United Nations principles as enunciated in its pre-amble and core articles were to ever be followed (just like America’s own admirable constitution): then wars of aggression and regime change would not be possible. Article 2.4 directly addresses this saying: “All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state”."

  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation linked to new virus, ran simulation three months prior to 'outbreak'

  5. These rich pricks have over 6 billion people on this planet living on less than $2 a day

    Putin is part of the BRICS deal it is a set up

    They have no intentions of helping anyone but themselves

    They get their orders from their handlers which get their orders from Switzerland which get their orders from Pope which he gets his orders from Greenland (ROME)


    Financially speaking, the telecommunications industry is six times larger than all the combined pharmaceutical industry. That could certainly be an explanation for why federal agencies are acting relatively powerless when it comes to regulating new technology, and not demanding thorough testing before implementation.

    Just three years ago, in 2016, a ten-year study was completed that showed significant increases in cancer in rats exposed to cell phone radiation. These results contradict the widely held assumption that EMF has no harmful effects simply because the mechanism of action wasn’t understood – the assumption was that because low levels of radio frequency radiation (under the SAR safety limits for cell phones) don’t cause a detectable tissue heating effect, which assumes that this heating effect is the only mechanism that could cause harm. This is certainly not the case.

    The findings of the 2016 study show that as the intensity of the radiation increased, so did the incidence of cancer among the rats – a significant dose-response relationship. Of special importance are the types of tumors the rats developed: high rates of glioma (tumors in the glial cells in the brain) and malignant schwannoma of the heart. This coincides with at least four epidemiological studies that also link cell phone use to those types of cancers. None of the rats in the control group developed either of these cancers. It’s also important to note that gliomas are a particularly deadly type of cancer. Most people survive only 1 to 3 years after diagnosis.

    Based on the conclusiveness and seriousness of this study, the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) began urging federal agencies to inform the public of these results. Initially, NTP senior managers stated that they believe these results should be publicized as soon as possible because of the high risk level. The FDA and FCC, the two agencies responsible for regulating exposure to radio frequency radiation, were alerted to the study results but did not state how they planned to proceed with this information. Then at the beginning of 2018, the NTP did an unexplained one-eighty and stated that “using a cell phone is not a high-risk situation.”

    A peer-review panel of 11 pathologists and toxicologists from academia and industry reviewed the NTP’s draft reports of the 2016 study, and concluded that there is “clear evidence of carcinogenic activity” – “clear” being the strongest of 5 terms used to classify evidence of carcinogenicity.

    Why the NTP is now dramatically downplaying the obvious and undisputed results of this study, is cause for much speculation."

    Maybe this sudden virus is being used to cover for the RF systems coming online in those cities? or maybe its a direct effect of those virii being activated by the new RF systems coming online.

    Heres the url it was pulled from:

    1. 5G might exacerbate such... and since it can be setup to be directionally salient imagine how easy it would be to push a button and have every 5G transmitter focus a slew of beams on one to produce specific affect as one moves from area to area... the transmitters being produced have both directional arrays and an omnidirectional field array... and just use the subscription of the cell phone as the tag to aim the beams at... since that tends to always be carried on the individual directly...

      the quiet targeted cancer giving to individual people that become a thorn in the ass of the seeming authority.

  7. Worth a read even though we know of their tactics

  8. Another site up about public versus private


Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.