By Anna Von Reitz
There is more than enough evidence to prove that whatever hopped-up fire-bombing occurred at Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II, it was not a nuclear bomb and not a nuclear disaster. Somehow, perfectly sane people, including physicists, have failed to note the radioactive half-life of the isotopes involved.
If the bombs unleashed at Hiroshima or Nagasaki had actually been nuclear bombs, those cities and a large bit of the countryside around them would be dead and uninhabitable as a result of nuclear pollution and that pollution would remain for tens of thousands of years---- like Sodom and Gemorrah, not like Hiroshima and Nagasaki today.
There would also be evident vitrification of the soil and subsoil at least two meters down.
So, we have another Big Lie to face up to and it's not a matter of "National Security". National Shame and money laundering is more like it.
I don't believe in nuclear weapons in the sense that the popular notion of "nuclear explosion" has it, but I do believe in nuclear pollution---and the deadly effects that radioactive isotopes can have on biological systems. Fukushima, the reactor, not a bomb, is creating exactly this horrendous scenario in the Pacific Ocean.
Radio-isotopes are very silent, effective, and long-lived biological poisons.
That's why the pollution caused by including "spent" nuclear fuel in the payloads of bombs used during recent wars in the Mideast is a war crime against humanity and against the Earth---- a crime against our soldiers and a crime against the civilian populace of the Middle East where this heinous thing was done.
That in itself is more than enough reason to summon an International War Crimes Tribunal to Nuremberg.
Similarly, it is the pollution potentially caused by a nuclear "dirty bomb" that is implied by the Baby Boomer bombs ---- not just physical explosive destruction which could be caused by any combination of metallic firebomb materials including Thermite, powdered Barium, etc.
The advantage to these monsters in the use of dirty bomb technology is that it helps prevent/preclude recovery of surviving records and examination of the bomb site. I hope that those promoting this scheme will now realize that the records will still exist and are still safe no matter what they do to the record repositories in Kansas and Colorado.
Also, the important records had already been removed from the Kansas repository, so that tells us right there that someone knew something and that the records had already been cashiered, stolen, or otherwise transported for purposes unknown by persons unknown. A big nasty explosion with radioactive fallout would seal the site and provide an excuse for the theft to remain undetected and provide an excuse to say that the records had been destroyed.
Just like 911.
The rats are not having a good week. And I personally hope it gets even hotter for them.