Are you looking for Solutions for America in Distress

You are in the right place to find out about what is really going on behind the scenes in the patriot movement in America, including solutions from Oathkeepers, Anna Von Reitz, Constitutional Sheriffs, Richard Mack, and many more people who are leading the charge to restore America to freedom and peace. Please search on the right for over 8400 articles.
You will find some conflicting views from some of these authors. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. What they write is their own opinion, just as what I write is my own. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Please keep the discussion about the issues, and keep it civil. The administrator reserves the right to remove any comment for any reason by anyone. Use the golden rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Additionally we do not allow comments with advertising links in them for your products. When you post a comment, it is in the public domain. You have no copyright that can be enforced against any other individual who comments here! Do not attempt to copyright your comments. If that is not to your liking please do not comment. Any attempt to copyright a comment will be deleted. Copyright is a legal term that means the creator of original content. This does not include ideas. You are not an author of articles on this blog. Your comments are deemed donated to the public domain. They will be considered "fair use" on this blog. People donate to this blog because of what Anna writes and what Paul writes, not what the people commenting write. We are not using your comments. You are putting them in the public domain when you comment. What you write in the comments is your opinion only. This comment section is not a court of law. Do not attempt to publish any kind of "affidavit" in the comments. Any such attempt will also be summarily deleted. Comments containing foul language will be deleted no matter what is said in the comment.


Sunday, October 8, 2017

Selling What Isn't Theirs


By Anna Von Reitz

On top of all the other odd news I am in receipt of, there are people going around trying to sell (with a straight face) -- "Water Districts".
They think that because they bought the "Water District" from some one or another of the bankrupt levels of a fraudulently operated governmental services corporation that they now own the water in say, part of California. Or Nebraska. Or North Dakota.
And having been honestly deluded themselves, they are now wandering around trying to sell Water Districts to investors.
Hello?
Trying to sell a Water District is like trying to sell The Big Rock Candy Mountain. Or Dog Patch, USA. Or any other totally made-up mental construct.
A "Water District" doesn't actually exist.
It's only an "administrative service area" created by a bankrupt corporation and has nothing whatsoever to do with actual water, which belongs absolutely and irrevocably to the people of the actual state.
Which brings up the fact that none of the wildlife refuges, ranges, game management areas, parks, monuments, or other "federal lands" in the western states and elsewhere are federal lands in fact. They are areas under "federal management".
Read that: these corporations have had the job held in trust to manage--- take care of and protect--- our lands. They are filling in the function of the King's Gamekeepers, and the people of each actual state are the "kings" in this country.
All the "federal government" has or has ever had is a "proprietary interest"--- a caretaker's interest.
That is what is so absurd and wrong-headed about the STATE OF OREGON or STATE OF NEVADA bringing suit against the Hammonds or the Bundys or any other American.
The Bundys own Nevada. They are the landlords.
So, their state, Nevada, contracts for caretaking services from the State of Nevada and the State of Nevada contracts for caretaking services from the STATE OF NEVADA, and somehow in the mix, the STATE OF NEVADA thinks it has a mandate allowing it to protect the State of Nevada against its employers---- say what?
Read that---- both the State of Nevada and the STATE OF NEVADA are acting against the Nevada State and people, under the pretense of working for them. They are attacking their employers because they don't know who they work for.
It's like the landlord getting shot by a lackey he hired to guard his property.
Go figure. We've got crooks working for us. Or fools. Or both.
This is only made possible via the mammoth administrative fraud we have detailed ---- all based on identity theft and merely "presumed" political statuses and deliberately falsified public records.
We bet that the moment that the Bundys accept the Oath of Office of Ms. Navarro and give her Notice of Liability and Harm and demand civilian due process----not "martial" law due process--- she will go flying off that bench like a squirrel caught in church during the Hallelujah Chorus.
Turns out, not only can you not own or control our water by buying a "management service area" defined by a defunct federal caretaking agency franchise, you can't own or control us by buying a state of state, either.
Buyers beware.
These guys rooked us out of quadrillions of dollars and set us up to take the blame for all their bad behavior. They won't blink as they try to sell you made up names and hokum as assets.
Thought for the day---- don't take any wooden nickels, and pass on the "water districts", too.

----------------------------
See this article and over 700 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
 To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

28 comments:

  1. Edward Mandell House had this to say in a private meeting with President Woodrow Wilson:

    “[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.



    Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. How do we know this if it was uttered in a private meeting? Is there a verifiable source for it?

      Delete
    4. wow... unbelievable yet very believable ...
      theres no shame at all in their criminal acts to the people.
      smh..

      Delete
    5. This quote is from the MINUTES of a meeting in the white house that included President Woodrow Wilson and his top adviser Colonel Edward Mandell House, before the Federal Reserve Act or the 16th Amendment (the income tax amendment) were passed and ratified.

      Delete
    6. for people doubting the quote...that is exactly what happened...whether an actual quote or not.

      i would recommend people read "woodrow wilson: disciple of revolution". many footnotes. so many he stuck them all at the back. but should generally support the above, with more characters as well.

      should be free on archive.org, or find it at a library or used.

      it is clear house had "marxist" ideas (or at least his idea of a "fair" society/world)...that was one reason for "centralizing credit" ...wilson also wrote "the new freedom" which i have not read, but it seems they wanted to do something "new". neither had any attachment to, if not outright hostility, to the sovereign states. they were, if nothing else, open to "New" ideas, perhaps did not know 100% what they wanted, but were happy to "experiment"

      likewise, andrew carnegie advocated reuniting with mother england and having a "shared citizenship" type deal...and there should be no lack of evidence for cecil rhodes wanting to reclaim both the u.s. but eventually have "world government" under, if not british, anglo-saxon rule (i.e. shared with americans, other "civilized" people who had the "white man's burden" (i.e. cursed to rule other races, who are not yet ready to govern themselves) )

      you can find all kinds of things about CFR roots (house was involved in starting it as well) which is basically old news for "conspiracy" stuff in the 50s 60s, but still not "mainstream"

      point being, even if someone does not buy the above quote...there is ample other evidence for house, ww, federal reserve, CFR origins, and other characters advocating similar things that time frame.

      also find a copy of house's book "philip dru: administrator" ... fiction, but seemed to be what he was working towards.

      so, i have not seen any "authoritative" source for above quote...but it is accurate to what they (and/or others) have done...

      so, i would say it is "True" whoever said it, whoever brought it about, whether they did it on purpose or "motivations" is harder to "prove" ... or if this is just an after-the-fact observation...i will say it is clearly accurate though, even if the source is in question.

      the phrase "human resources" should alarm people, yet it is all most have ever known.

      (paraphrase) "history must never forget it was woodrow wilson who allowed trotsky passage from canada to russia"

      ww's "14 points" also recognized the "bolsheviks" as the "victors".

      i do not mean to "red bait" ... it is more that such things should be well-known, but are not taught. not deemed "important" nowadays. such things were no secret at the time...more or less proclaimed openly.

      nowadays "socialists" would vehemently deny the federal reserve is "communist" or "socialist" ... but it is centralized credit of the nation, outlawing of actual money...it just goes into private hands, not "the public" ...

      monopoly capitalism and "socialism" get along just fine...a "private" company loves a government-guaranteed monopoly, all competition outlawed...they can do "government" type things, with guaranteed profits, and still be "capitalist" while everyone else is forced under their "socialism" ...

      to very loosely paraphrase the ghost of antony sutton "most these things are no secret...they are buried in government documents. the public just has no clue. the FBI / secret service all knew at the time."

      to paraphrase author of "ww: disciple of revolution": the real issue is not to pillory an aging mr. house in his final years...the real issue is invisible government, unelected "advisors" hidden from public view, versus transparency.

      Delete
    7. also i recommend people doubting above quote read (free on project gutenberg) a short story...hard to imagine people were so "optimistic" or "naive" ...

      http://www.gutenberg.org/files/624/624-h/624-h.htm

      Title: Looking Backwards from 2000 to 1887
      Author: Edward Bellamy
      ----
      a fictional story, but supposedly was well-known at the time.
      ----

      people nowadays see "credit" as a "capitalist" invention...but at the time, in some circles, it was seen as a "socialist" thing...it was "more fair" ... it was individual, rather than based on what "family" you were born into...

      pooling everyone's "credit" together was a very "social" thing to do...again, i do not mean to "Red bait" nor accuse people of being "socialists" (wadsworth from "clue" movie: communism is a red herring) ...

      just saying, there is plenty of "overlap" between "monopoly capitalism" and centralized "credit" and "socialists"

      "credit" between nations, a universal credit card for the world, was/is seen as very "social" thing to do ...they don't see it as slavery under unelected dictators with no escape and all private property outlawd...they see it as "everyone under the same system, fairness at last, everyone has to work, no more sponging off your rich grandparents estate"

      (others would point out, this coincided with the rise of tax-exempt foundations, where they could exempt their own estates, but everyone else got forced into "equality" and "fairness" ) ...

      most this stuff is "old news" ... still never "mainstream" though:

      https://watch.pair.com/heritage.html

      A.K. Chesterton said in Candour: "At times Capitalism and Communism would appear to be in conflict, but this writer is confident that their interests are in common and will eventually merge for one-world control. That policy outlined previously in Woodrow Wilson's Point Six has never been dropped.

      ----
      to paraphrase another source that is more "left" leaning (dont have link handy): the "left" gets to mold society via social control to their heart's content [out of make-believe money and monetized debt] ... the "right" gets [usurious crooked obscene] profits.
      -----------

      most these things are old news...they just aren't "mainstream" and aren't taught in "schools".

      the funny thing, is most these things also shock the self-proclaimed "socialists" and so-called "left" of today...most of them aren't "taught" such history either.

      they can't imagine the big bad "capitalist" federal reserve and bankers working with their idol economic ideology...some people will always deny such things, no matter how much evidence you show them.

      again, most of these things aren't necessarily "secret" ...just they are never mentioned.

      they are ancient history...just not seen as "important" nowadays, by "left" or "right" or "schools" or "news"...
      ----
      ask your local "banker" today...they don't see themselves as counterfeiting/debasing the "dollar" and enslaving people... they have to have "money" to lend you, you wouldn't want to go into a bank that didn't have "Money" to lend you...everything would grind to a halt...from their side, everything is peaches and cream...they don't see it as "counterfeiting" or "debasement"...

      Delete
  2. just a humorous FYI for Anna. In paragraph 7 above, she refers to "the Big Rock Candy Mountain" as a "made-up mental construct". The humorous thing is that Big Rock Candy Mountain actually exists and it is a small resort located in southern Utah on highway 89 about 30 miles south of Richfield. Many small pebbles on the mountainside resemble candy, hence the name Big Rock Candy Mountain. They actually make candy resembling the pebbles and sell it to visitors. It's really good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From Anna:

      Yes, but what I am trying to point out is the difference between an idea and a thing and how they can be confused via the use of labels and names.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As the late and great George Carlin stated about government "the game is rigged and the table is tilted and nobody seems to notice or care" "You see folks they have a big club and you ain't in it, you and I ain't in the big club" So what GC is saying (imo) is this. When the people who create the rules and then they also have the ability (legal or lawful) or otherwise to interpret (legalise) the rules for their favor. Then how does the small awakening man or woman win? Regardless of what you believe or know the game is rigged and the table is tilted and the authors of said rules interpret (legalise) the rules too. So how does one free themselves?! In many cases if the Decider you mailed your docs to then decides without having to consult then how does one gain the outcome they desire? Well crafted documents making claims of fraud, deception etc are simply discarded. Proof there is no one who receives a response. Those docs are either round filed or placed in a receptacle for future consideration. Oh, you have a signed and certified receipt? That person is no longer with us. We must have misplaced that. Could you send it again? For your consideration !

    ReplyDelete
  5. Senate doc #43 here's exactly what you own or don't own

    https://wakeup-world.com/2017/02/14/senate-document-43-proof-that-you-do-not-legally-own-any-property/

    ReplyDelete
  6. The circle completes itself here !

    God grant me the serenity
    to accept the things I cannot change;
    courage to change the things I can;
    and wisdom to know the difference.

    Living one day at a time;
    enjoying one moment at a time;
    accepting hardships as the pathway to peace;
    taking, as He did, this sinful world
    as it is, not as I would have it;
    trusting that He will make all things right
    if I surrender to His Will;
    that I may be reasonably happy in this life
    and supremely happy with Him
    forever in the next.
    Amen.

    ReplyDelete
  7. All of this stuff we question comes down to one thing and one thing only. Will using my precious and limited energy in this area really make a difference? Will I be just a useful idiot squandering my precious energy against a force that is not easily movable? So again, the circle completes itself this way. Hidden in plain sight.
    God grant me the serenity
    to accept the things I cannot change;
    courage to change the things I can;
    and wisdom to know the difference.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What Judge Anna fails to realize is that Life is lived and experienced from the inside out. And not by forces working externally against us. You came here with Zero and you leave here with tangibly Zero. Your Soul collects life experience. Which along the way requires discernment to better understand which missions are worth the effort / energy ? Human energy is finite. Much of that energy might be better invested in seeking activities that bring you Joy. You may return here many times? However, in this / now moment is all you have to use, consider and remember.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown I totally disagree; to accept the things that you cannot change? well I guess you'll never be able to change them if you don't at least try to,, I'm fighting and so should you.

      Delete
    2. Unknown I totally disagree; to accept the things that you cannot change? well I guess you'll never be able to change them if you don't at least try to,, I'm fighting and so should you.

      Delete
    3. I tend to agree. At least to a point. If no one even tries to expose this fraud, how in the hell do they expect to receive any honesty at all. We can just call everuthing "Civil", including murder, rape, extortion, and all mala in se crimes ....civil. Mr so and so, you are charged with murder...sorry officer, but this is a civil matter. Take your cuffs and get out of my house.....!! History has always proven that the only way out of slavery is to rebell. Why should only a few people like me and others spend time in jail fighting for everyones freedoms, while everyone else sits in a couch with a beer and watch sports....real fair!!!!

      Delete
  9. Unknown, for once I agree with you to a point. As we know already the pope gave the US 3 years in which to give back to the People what is rightfully their, and he said 'if you dont, I will do it for you''.
    He was declaring a Jubilee. Yet, as Anna already said, the pope did not lift a finger to oversee the outcome of this, nor did he even keep his word to ''do it for them''.
    When a pope professes to be the ''vicar of Christ' (which he surely is not) and deliberately lets this all fritter away, and blatantly disregards the whole thing, like ''oh well''.......then how much more will all the rest of those so notified, also act in the same manner?
    Who is the ''enforcer''?
    I see this Time in history as a bitter fight to The End. Our Enemy will not go down easy and is already designing ways to overcome and maintain their disgusting hold on power. We are dealing with insane people all the way round.
    Jan. 1 we will see if the tyrannical court system changes. And by Jun.1 we will see the final outcome of ''who wins''. I have a lot of discernment which so far has never failed me; it is my innate 6th sense, a gift given to me.
    IF these two things do not go our way, then there will be no more point in trying to live on this planet. That will be the tipping point that will cause God to go into his Final Action. He will remove
    His Own from the planet and the rest will be in a most horrific time of destruction, especially for those tyrants who brought it on. They will never see their Plans comes to fruition, but hell is their reward.
    Anna has notified them all and given them their very last opportunity to do what is Right, and all at the same time. So she has served her purpose and done a great job at it. Her Reward will be great.

    Folks, you can scoff or you can take heed if you are wise. We are at The Crossroads now. It is now ''repent, or perish''time. If you have never taken God seriously, then its time to set everything else aside and get down on your knees, repent of all your own ways that are not pleasing to God, relinquish them, turn from them all, and ask Him to forgive you and to CHANGE you. Otherwise armageddon is your future.
    Do NOT rush off to some mealy mouth ''church'. Your own living room works best. If its not a place you can be alone, totally alone, then go get in your car and drive out to a quiet place. (take kleenex with you) Open up your whole heart, throw away all your self-guarding and your obstinance, let God take whatever is in there and throw it away for you, and fill you with a New You. Be in awe of the greatness of God, for He is worthy of our praise. Think. Without Him we would all be facing armageddon.
    (I in no way intended to say this; it must be for someone here.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Amen Abby I have fight in me to at least try!

      Delete
    3. Amen Abby I have fight in me to at least try!

      Delete
  10. Well, I hate to say this but i think we will be very surprised at the people who make it into heaven... He is truely a forgiving God, because if he wasnt none of us would make it.. And dont forget there are millions of people born before Christ who havent yet been given the chance to accept him....and there is certainly tons of evil people before he came to save us..!! But dont forget the body is only a shell...its only the "blood" that keeps it alive, and the blood contains his own message within our DNA , thats why they call it the molecule of life... if Jesus is the tree of life, then we are the leaves that keep it going.. In that way we are all connected. Thats why he cant be to harsh in his judgement, but only to those leaves that are truely dead already...what good is a tree without leaves...!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. James, there are conditions to be met before forgiveness is obtained. It is far more than ''oops, I goofed, and excuse me please''glibly, and then continuing to live like hell. It has to be a way of life, a straightening up thru and thru, inside and outside. And if you think Judgement is not going to be harsh, then you have yet to understand just what that final Wrath consists of. Its time to read facts, and set aside your own ideas.

      Delete
  11. Governor Greg Abbott sued Obama 30 times there about and won the majority of cases.
    They definitely have us out gunned.
    But the most dangerous thing in the world is one man with a gun and the will to use it.
    As long as there a few honest judges we stand a chance. Default is civil war.
    Listening to talk shows and if you think about it we have been at war with the pro British forces or federalist sense Alexander Hamilton started a standing army and appointed him self general and threatened the south to shut them up.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Taxing the south at 70% and letting northern robber Barron's get off free.running up national credit card and keeping the funds strictly for the benefit of the north .remember the southerner Thomas Jefferson mothballed the navy and appointed the states to defend Thair own waters.told the north you want a escort services you pay for it. Don't forget the war of 1812 the British used central banking to milk her colonies president Andrew Jackson call them a den of vipers and rooted themy out that resulted in the war of 1812.

    ReplyDelete
  13. people doubting anna's post...just look up "republic" in blacks law dictionary (should be in any edition).

    ALL power is delegated from "The people" to all levels. such is a "republic" as defined by "law".

    that doesn't mean "The people" can run around doing whatever they want (the "king" or "kings" in this case, is still not above the "law") ... it just means the order of operations, the flow of delegated power, is "bottom up" not "top down" ...

    ask yourself "would the people knowingly, intentionally, deliberately give away all their lands to people who they hired to serve them?"

    it may sound far-fetched to many who have no knowledge of how things are supposed to work...but the alternative, everyone (not just one county, one city, one state, but EVERYONE) knowingly intentionally gave what is rightfully and fully theirs, all away, for nothing in return, is too ridiculous to entertain

    ReplyDelete

Place your comment. The moderator will review it after it is published. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason.